Coercive diplomacy is the diplomacy of threats. Rather than relying on negotiation, diplomats will sometimes threaten adverse consequences if a demand is not met. Sometimes this works; at other times, it does not.
Factors that influence the success of coercive diplomacy are similar to the factors that influence the success of other types of threats: the threat must be credible, the adverse consequence must be severe enough that the potential recipient really wants to avoid that outcome, and the demand must be clear and possible to meet. Even when these factors are present however, coercive diplomacy is risky. As with other threats, it tends further damage relationships and lead to a potential backlash against the threat and/or the threatening country later on. Backlash can, at times, be limited if the threat is combined with more integrative or exchange-based approaches. If rewards for compliance are offered in addition to the threat for non-compliance, the chances of success may be greater; also if the threat is seen to be legitimate, the chances of success may also rise.
Coercive diplomacy is the diplomacy of threats. Rather than relying on negotiation, diplomats will sometimes threaten adverse consequences if a demand is not met. Sometimes this works; at other times, it does not.
Factors that influence the success of coercive diplomacy are similar to the factors that influence the success of other types of threats: the threat must be credible, the adverse consequence must be severe enough that the potential recipient really wants to avoid that outcome, and the demand must be clear and possible to meet. Even when these factors are present however, coercive diplomacy is risky. As with other threats, it tends further damage relationships and lead to a potential backlash against the threat and/or the threatening country later on. Backlash can, at times, be limited if the threat is combined with more integrative or exchange-based approaches. If rewards for compliance are offered in addition to the threat for non-compliance, the chances of success may be greater; also if the threat is seen to be legitimate, the chances of success may also rise.
30 aug2020 antifa beyond the smoke and broken mirrors-catinomartincatino
ANTIFA and its associates, partners, and networks have created destruction and instability across the United States while challenging the very foundations of American freedom. Understanding ANTIFA’s essential strategies, operations, and tactics is critical for countering their subversive agenda which targets our political system, law enforcement community, social structures (educational, racial, and religious), freedom of speech and media, as well as our economic strengths including attacks on small business owners. Occupied Zones, Black Bloc tactics, Affinity Groups, “armed self-defense,” direct action, and dark networks will be critical subjects in this presentation.
The two pieces are often held to represent two different types of .docxwsusan1
The two pieces are often held to represent two different types of discourse: Lincoln’s address is categorized as rhetoric, while Dickinson’s work fits best into the category of poetry.
Thinking back on the characteristics of rhetorical discourse discussed in this chapter, what case could be made, if any, for distinguishing Lincoln’s work from Dickinson’s? Do they belong in different literary categories?
Refer back to the resources of language – argument, appeal, arrangement, and artistic devices – in thinking about these two pieces. Does each employ all four resources? (Resources are attached separately)
Second Inaugural Address – Abraham Lincoln
Fellow-Countrymen: At this second appearing to take the oath of the Presidential office there is less occasion for an extended address than there was at the first. Then a statement somewhat in detail of a course to be pursued seemed fitting and proper. Now, at the expiration of four years, during which public declarations have been constantly called forth on every point and phase of the great contest which still absorbs the attention and engrosses the energies of the nation, little that is new could be presented.
The progress of our arms, upon which all else chiefly depends, is as well known to the public as to myself, and it is, I trust, reasonably satisfactory and encouraging to all. With high hope for the future, no prediction in regard to it is ventured.
On the occasion corresponding to this four years ago all thoughts were anxiously directed to an impending civil war. All dreaded it, all sought to avert it. While the inaugural address was being delivered from this place, devoted altogether to saving the Union without war, urgent agents were in the city seeking to destroy it without war—seeking to dissolve the Union and divide effects by negotiation. Both parties deprecated war, but one of them would make war rather than let the nation survive, and the other would accept war rather than let it perish, and the war came. One-eighth of the whole population were colored slaves, not distributed generally over the Union, but localized in the southern part of it. These slaves constituted a peculiar and powerful interest. All knew that this interest was somehow the cause of the war. To strengthen, perpetuate, and extend this interest was the object for which the insurgents would rend the Union even by war, while the Government claimed no right to do more than to restrict the territorial enlargement of it.
Neither party expected for the war the magnitude or the duration which it has already attained. Neither anticipated that the cause of the conflict might cease with or even before the conflict itself should cease. Each looked for an easier triumph, and a result less fundamental and astounding. Both read the same Bible and pray to the same God, and each invokes His aid against the other. It may seem
strange that any men should dare to ask a just God’s assistance in wringing their bread from the swe.
Write 3-5 pages in which you discuss how the COVID-19 pandemic an.docxmadlynplamondon
Write 3-5 pages in which you discuss how the COVID-19 pandemic and shelter-in-place orders have impacted you personally, your family and friends, and society as a whole. Relate these impacts to one or more concepts, theory ( Karl Max, Emilie Durkheim, Max Weber, W.E.B. DuBois, Robert Merton, Michel Foucault.)
For example, write about classism and the impact staying at home has had on different classes of people (i.e. those who can work remotely at home vs. those who can’t work at all). You could also discuss new ways of connecting with others during this time, like Zoom, FaceTime, etc. Did social constructs change during this time? Will resocialization be an issue after the social distancing is relaxed? Or, you can talk about urban sociology and how Boston or your home city has changed due to the pandemic. Or, how has globalization changed? There are many possibilities – be creative!
Details:
· Introduce your topic and how/why it is relevant to what we learned this semester
· Describe the situation Include an explanation of the situation, specifics of the situation, how you feel about the situation and why.
· Situate your topic within at least one concept discussed this semester (i.e. class, race, crime & deviance).
o IMPORTANT: Cite at least 2 concepts or pieces of information from the readings or lecture. See under Format below on how to do it.
· Write a conclusion summarizing the major points you made in the paper.
Format: 3-5 pages double-spaced, Times New Roman size 12 font, 1 inch margins, indent your paragraphs instead of skipping lines. Use first person when writing (e.g. “The problems started when I left my parents’ house…”). Begin the paper with a title, your name, and date. Edit carefully for spelling and grammar.
Think about the current pandemic, explain how it relates and/or will relate to other general social issues (class, race, crime & deviance, etc ) AND relate it to one of the major sociologist theories.
DOCUMENT 4
Dwight D. Eisenhower, “Farewell Address to the Nation” (1961)
Document Background: On January 17, 1961, President Dwight D. Eisenhower gave his farewell address to the nation. Over the previous two decades, the United States had undergone numerous significant changes, including World War II, the beginning of the Cold War, the Korean War, the emergence of nuclear weapons, a rapidly growing economy, and several substantial Civil Rights victories. Eisenhower, as a general and then as president, had been at the center of many of these. In his farewell address, Eisenhower focused on the Cold War with the Soviet Union and on the challenges facing the United States, including a warning about the growing power of the “military-industrial complex.”
Dwight D. Eisenhower:
I.
My fellow Americans:
Three days from now, after half a century in the service of our country, I shall lay down the responsibilities of office as, in traditional and solemn ceremony, the authority of the.
Strong Compare and Contrast Essay Examples. Surprising Comparison Contrast Essay Examples ~ Thatsnotus. Example of how to write a compare and contrast essay - How to Write an .... 001 Essay Example Comparison Compare And Contrast Basic ~ Thatsnotus. Compare and Contrast Essay II | Secondary School | Lecture. What Is a Compare and Contrast Essay? Simple Examples To Guide You ....
30 aug2020 antifa beyond the smoke and broken mirrors-catinomartincatino
ANTIFA and its associates, partners, and networks have created destruction and instability across the United States while challenging the very foundations of American freedom. Understanding ANTIFA’s essential strategies, operations, and tactics is critical for countering their subversive agenda which targets our political system, law enforcement community, social structures (educational, racial, and religious), freedom of speech and media, as well as our economic strengths including attacks on small business owners. Occupied Zones, Black Bloc tactics, Affinity Groups, “armed self-defense,” direct action, and dark networks will be critical subjects in this presentation.
The two pieces are often held to represent two different types of .docxwsusan1
The two pieces are often held to represent two different types of discourse: Lincoln’s address is categorized as rhetoric, while Dickinson’s work fits best into the category of poetry.
Thinking back on the characteristics of rhetorical discourse discussed in this chapter, what case could be made, if any, for distinguishing Lincoln’s work from Dickinson’s? Do they belong in different literary categories?
Refer back to the resources of language – argument, appeal, arrangement, and artistic devices – in thinking about these two pieces. Does each employ all four resources? (Resources are attached separately)
Second Inaugural Address – Abraham Lincoln
Fellow-Countrymen: At this second appearing to take the oath of the Presidential office there is less occasion for an extended address than there was at the first. Then a statement somewhat in detail of a course to be pursued seemed fitting and proper. Now, at the expiration of four years, during which public declarations have been constantly called forth on every point and phase of the great contest which still absorbs the attention and engrosses the energies of the nation, little that is new could be presented.
The progress of our arms, upon which all else chiefly depends, is as well known to the public as to myself, and it is, I trust, reasonably satisfactory and encouraging to all. With high hope for the future, no prediction in regard to it is ventured.
On the occasion corresponding to this four years ago all thoughts were anxiously directed to an impending civil war. All dreaded it, all sought to avert it. While the inaugural address was being delivered from this place, devoted altogether to saving the Union without war, urgent agents were in the city seeking to destroy it without war—seeking to dissolve the Union and divide effects by negotiation. Both parties deprecated war, but one of them would make war rather than let the nation survive, and the other would accept war rather than let it perish, and the war came. One-eighth of the whole population were colored slaves, not distributed generally over the Union, but localized in the southern part of it. These slaves constituted a peculiar and powerful interest. All knew that this interest was somehow the cause of the war. To strengthen, perpetuate, and extend this interest was the object for which the insurgents would rend the Union even by war, while the Government claimed no right to do more than to restrict the territorial enlargement of it.
Neither party expected for the war the magnitude or the duration which it has already attained. Neither anticipated that the cause of the conflict might cease with or even before the conflict itself should cease. Each looked for an easier triumph, and a result less fundamental and astounding. Both read the same Bible and pray to the same God, and each invokes His aid against the other. It may seem
strange that any men should dare to ask a just God’s assistance in wringing their bread from the swe.
Write 3-5 pages in which you discuss how the COVID-19 pandemic an.docxmadlynplamondon
Write 3-5 pages in which you discuss how the COVID-19 pandemic and shelter-in-place orders have impacted you personally, your family and friends, and society as a whole. Relate these impacts to one or more concepts, theory ( Karl Max, Emilie Durkheim, Max Weber, W.E.B. DuBois, Robert Merton, Michel Foucault.)
For example, write about classism and the impact staying at home has had on different classes of people (i.e. those who can work remotely at home vs. those who can’t work at all). You could also discuss new ways of connecting with others during this time, like Zoom, FaceTime, etc. Did social constructs change during this time? Will resocialization be an issue after the social distancing is relaxed? Or, you can talk about urban sociology and how Boston or your home city has changed due to the pandemic. Or, how has globalization changed? There are many possibilities – be creative!
Details:
· Introduce your topic and how/why it is relevant to what we learned this semester
· Describe the situation Include an explanation of the situation, specifics of the situation, how you feel about the situation and why.
· Situate your topic within at least one concept discussed this semester (i.e. class, race, crime & deviance).
o IMPORTANT: Cite at least 2 concepts or pieces of information from the readings or lecture. See under Format below on how to do it.
· Write a conclusion summarizing the major points you made in the paper.
Format: 3-5 pages double-spaced, Times New Roman size 12 font, 1 inch margins, indent your paragraphs instead of skipping lines. Use first person when writing (e.g. “The problems started when I left my parents’ house…”). Begin the paper with a title, your name, and date. Edit carefully for spelling and grammar.
Think about the current pandemic, explain how it relates and/or will relate to other general social issues (class, race, crime & deviance, etc ) AND relate it to one of the major sociologist theories.
DOCUMENT 4
Dwight D. Eisenhower, “Farewell Address to the Nation” (1961)
Document Background: On January 17, 1961, President Dwight D. Eisenhower gave his farewell address to the nation. Over the previous two decades, the United States had undergone numerous significant changes, including World War II, the beginning of the Cold War, the Korean War, the emergence of nuclear weapons, a rapidly growing economy, and several substantial Civil Rights victories. Eisenhower, as a general and then as president, had been at the center of many of these. In his farewell address, Eisenhower focused on the Cold War with the Soviet Union and on the challenges facing the United States, including a warning about the growing power of the “military-industrial complex.”
Dwight D. Eisenhower:
I.
My fellow Americans:
Three days from now, after half a century in the service of our country, I shall lay down the responsibilities of office as, in traditional and solemn ceremony, the authority of the.
Strong Compare and Contrast Essay Examples. Surprising Comparison Contrast Essay Examples ~ Thatsnotus. Example of how to write a compare and contrast essay - How to Write an .... 001 Essay Example Comparison Compare And Contrast Basic ~ Thatsnotus. Compare and Contrast Essay II | Secondary School | Lecture. What Is a Compare and Contrast Essay? Simple Examples To Guide You ....
Presentation by Center for Community Journalism and Development Executive Director Red Batario at the Institute for Autonomy & Governance Community Journalism for Peace workshop, Cotabato City, 18 December 2011
Diplomado Ejecutivo en Gerencia Política y Gobernanza Estratégicasebastian kraljevich
Información sobre el nuevo programa de The Gradiate School of Political Management, GSPM, en The George Washington University:
Diplomado Ejecutivo en Gerencia Política y Gobernanza Estratégica, On Line y en español.
17. Level of Compliance to Exit What will we do if they don’t comply? Are our threats credible? Are they persuasive enough? Are we willing to sustain the threats? Foes Non-Compliant Parties Compliant Parties To what degree do we need neutrals compliant? Neutrals
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26. The Future: What is Their Narrative? Photos taken by Sean Caskie
31. NCPs observe environment act orient decide Coalition member debriefs CC analysis by coalition Coalition’s CC strategy/tactics Coalition members meet Non-Compliant Parties Missions assigned to sub-coalitions, CIMIC, IO, etc Coalition Intel
Editor's Notes
Welcome – thank them for coming – introduce people around the table Disclaimer and talk about Afghanistan – when you first met an Afghan.
All its history Afghanistan has benefitted and fell prey to its geography. Today there are multiple players engaging in the discussion. Iran is particularly interested in the stability of Afghanistan. First, Iran does not want another wave of refugees. Second, Iran is not comfortable with the US at its doorstep. Third, Iran envisions an alliance from Turkey to China – united via a gas pipeline.
For compliant parties what promises need to be honored to ensure compliance? What sanctions need to be in place if agreements are violated? How do we make sure that all our messaging – from the military and civilian organizations are aligned? Our collaborative confrontations abound – Pres. Karzai, our NATO Allies, within our own government structure – there are layers of confrontations and as policy shifts there is a ripple effect. For example, there was a great deal of ill will created between the US government and President Karzai when the US wanted to fly over poppy fields and eradicate the crop. Now the policy has changed and it is no longer a priority – but the harsh exchanges and the tone of discussions has not warmed since those confrontations.
“ Will it maintain or tolerate local client militias and postpone comprehensively disarming local leaders to avert a large-scale insurgency or will it actively try to establish a state with a reasonable chance of survival beyond a US occupation at the risk of facing a broad insurgency?” page 273 Book by Sinno “ U.S. Embassy and Afghan officials are working to modify the program, called Local Defense Initiatives, to ensure that the Afghan government plays a more central role in how it is run. "We are committed to doing this right, and that means taking the time for the Afghan government and people to decide on whether and how to move ahead," said Philip Kosnett, the U.S. Embassy's political-military counselor in Kabul. “ from the Washington Post, January 2010