Chamilo Users day Author : Jérémie Grépilloux  ( [email_address] )  Date : 28/03/2011
An LMS to enrich a classical classroom : feedback
Plan Context Methodology Different kind of interventions Enrichment  on  several   levels But... Conclusion
Context Master Degree in Scientific and Technical Communication 15 students  No great computing background Thematic : Web publication (blogs, wikis, web2, social networks)
Methodology Not all the tools of the platform at first:  - Forums  (evaluation and assistance)   - Documents  (course resources and complementary one) - Users  (social cohesion)
Methodology Not all the tools of the platform - Forums  (evaluation and assistance)   - Documents  (course resources and complementary one) - Users  (social cohesion) But then..  - Links  (pedagogical awareness) - Chat  (Regulation, motivation, assistance) - Announces  (instant information) - DropBox  (home duty)
Forums
Documents
Links
Chat
Announces
DropBox
Users
Methodology At the beginning a very closely planned schedule But then....  - a constant presence within the forums - a irregular presence by chat : - on demand (from student) - planned via Announces - when working on the course
Different kinds of intervention Thanks to the platform the role of the teacher evolved. - still educational - but also guide for technical or administrative difficulties  - and then to help for student motivation
Helping motivation (e.g.)
Enrichment (1/2)  On different sides Forums  have permit to :  - maintain an activity on the on-line side of the course (evaluation) - create a real level of communication between the teacher and the student (formal and informal topics) - make students to really became pro-active - make them help each other  Documents  and  links  pushed further the panel of educational resources  that the students could discover and take as part of their educational process.
Enrichment (2/2)  Chat  :  - allowed the teacher to help more precisely a certain amount of students who were « out of race ». - helped students to stay confident and motivated Announces  :  - help teachers to contact immediately the students in order to relaunch the dynamic of the classroom or just to inform them of a change within the course (new resource, new topic, etc.)
But...  The course on the LMS required a great involvement from the teacher.  Need a great motivation from his side too (as well as for the student one)  Much more time granted to the “extra educational” resources research and accompaniment of the students than on a “normal” course Not only a teacher but also :  - a social regulator (reassuring or motivation students) - an educational moderator - a guide toward new educational products
Conclusion  Great enrichment via LMS Tools Different tools for different typology of courses Pro-active learning for students Great group cohesion Much more better acquisition of educational notions and « deep learning »  Learning become much more incentive  But Requires much time from teacher Requires teacher to listen to students needs Requires a great personal organization from the teacher
Bonus –  screenshot of the testimony of a student connected to the chat during the presentation and answering questions from the session's room audience.
Images Credits http://www.univ-lemans.fr/progens/licpro_acvib/panneau_indicateur_petit.jpg http://porteightyeight.files.wordpress.com/2009/06/conclusion.jpg http://educophobe.over-blog.com/article-37106479-6.html http://christdominion.com/images/methodology.jpg http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_FE4yZGk-TeE/TTXT7QhDHnI/AAAAAAAAADg/xfxGmCmJmUY/s1600/12+picsou.jpg

Course enrichment using Chamilo

  • 1.
    Chamilo Users dayAuthor : Jérémie Grépilloux ( [email_address] ) Date : 28/03/2011
  • 2.
    An LMS toenrich a classical classroom : feedback
  • 3.
    Plan Context MethodologyDifferent kind of interventions Enrichment on several levels But... Conclusion
  • 4.
    Context Master Degreein Scientific and Technical Communication 15 students No great computing background Thematic : Web publication (blogs, wikis, web2, social networks)
  • 5.
    Methodology Not allthe tools of the platform at first: - Forums (evaluation and assistance) - Documents (course resources and complementary one) - Users (social cohesion)
  • 6.
    Methodology Not allthe tools of the platform - Forums (evaluation and assistance) - Documents (course resources and complementary one) - Users (social cohesion) But then.. - Links (pedagogical awareness) - Chat (Regulation, motivation, assistance) - Announces (instant information) - DropBox (home duty)
  • 7.
  • 8.
  • 9.
  • 10.
  • 11.
  • 12.
  • 13.
  • 14.
    Methodology At thebeginning a very closely planned schedule But then.... - a constant presence within the forums - a irregular presence by chat : - on demand (from student) - planned via Announces - when working on the course
  • 15.
    Different kinds ofintervention Thanks to the platform the role of the teacher evolved. - still educational - but also guide for technical or administrative difficulties - and then to help for student motivation
  • 16.
  • 17.
    Enrichment (1/2) On different sides Forums have permit to : - maintain an activity on the on-line side of the course (evaluation) - create a real level of communication between the teacher and the student (formal and informal topics) - make students to really became pro-active - make them help each other Documents and links pushed further the panel of educational resources that the students could discover and take as part of their educational process.
  • 18.
    Enrichment (2/2) Chat : - allowed the teacher to help more precisely a certain amount of students who were « out of race ». - helped students to stay confident and motivated Announces : - help teachers to contact immediately the students in order to relaunch the dynamic of the classroom or just to inform them of a change within the course (new resource, new topic, etc.)
  • 19.
    But... Thecourse on the LMS required a great involvement from the teacher. Need a great motivation from his side too (as well as for the student one) Much more time granted to the “extra educational” resources research and accompaniment of the students than on a “normal” course Not only a teacher but also : - a social regulator (reassuring or motivation students) - an educational moderator - a guide toward new educational products
  • 20.
    Conclusion Greatenrichment via LMS Tools Different tools for different typology of courses Pro-active learning for students Great group cohesion Much more better acquisition of educational notions and « deep learning » Learning become much more incentive But Requires much time from teacher Requires teacher to listen to students needs Requires a great personal organization from the teacher
  • 21.
    Bonus – screenshot of the testimony of a student connected to the chat during the presentation and answering questions from the session's room audience.
  • 22.
    Images Credits http://www.univ-lemans.fr/progens/licpro_acvib/panneau_indicateur_petit.jpghttp://porteightyeight.files.wordpress.com/2009/06/conclusion.jpg http://educophobe.over-blog.com/article-37106479-6.html http://christdominion.com/images/methodology.jpg http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_FE4yZGk-TeE/TTXT7QhDHnI/AAAAAAAAADg/xfxGmCmJmUY/s1600/12+picsou.jpg