Contemporary Issues Debate Forum Students will be given 3 debate topics this semester. For each topic the students will watch a documentary they selected regarding the topic. It must be a scholarly video/documentary or you will not receive credit. Students will then complete an assignment that requires they develop opinions for and against the topic of the video. Students will submit their debate in black board on the following due dates: · Debate Topic One: Criminal Justice Reform: After watching the video on you will write a three (3) paragraph essay as follows: Paragraph 1: Summarize in one paragraph, the main topic of the video: · What is the Issue? · Why is this an issue? Who does it affect. Paragraph 2: Write an argumentative paragraph Supporting the issue: you must list three reasons you are in support of the issue. These must be complete sentences. Example: I support the death penalty because it is a just punishment, etc.., then list two more reasons you support the death penalty. Paragraph 3: Write an argumentative paragraph Opposing the issue: you must list three reasons you are opposing the issue. These must be complete sentences. Example: I am opposed to death penalty because it violates civil rights of cruel and unusual punishment, etc.., then list two more reasons you are opposed to the death penalty. Responses to Peer’s Posts – Please use the format below to respond to each question. You can write 3 to 4 sentences for each question. *Item Four: Discuss the meaning of this statement: "Research + Common Sense = Effective Teaching." John said that (paraphrase what John said), and I agree to part of his response when he said….but I wonder if…. *Item Five: Bandura (1997) identified teachers that have strong teacher efficacy. Explain what he meant by the term teacher efficacy. Include the definition provided in the text—“…the belief that what a teacher does makes a difference”. John said that (paraphrase what John said), …. Discussion One Item One: Describe a moral dilemma; then describe how an individual might reason at each stage of Kohlberg's theory of moral development. You should create your own hypothetical moral dilemma and carry it through the three levels and six stages of Kohlberg's theory. A moral dilemma is when someone has a conflict when they have to choose between two or more actions. The person has a moral reason for choosing each action they do. The persons’ reasoning is what is important, not their final choice. A dilemma that I came up with is about a little girl who wants to be able to buy a snack at school instead of eating the snack that her parents send her. She knows that her friends keep their snack money in their binders. When working through Kohlberg’s stages she would consider the reasoning of each choice she made. Preconventional Level: The rules are set down by others. Stage 1: The little girl must decide the consequences of her choices. The little girl could ask her friends fo.