Due Jan 24 15 In Phase 2, your team will work together to develop a detailed description and implementation plan for the innovation you selected to pursue in Module 3. Each team member must research and describe a product development or management process, methodology, or model that could be utilized to implement the innovation. The group should select and use one of these models for developing its own implementation plan. For this assignment, write a paper of 2,000-3,000 words that addresses the following: Finalize the name and include a one- or two-sentence description of the innovation. Describe the value the new product or service will provide to customers and describe the need it will meet. Utilizing the model selected by the team, create the detailed implementation plan for the innovation. Make sure the plan accounts for contingencies/risks in the implementation process and includes realistic timeframe and budgeting considerations. Use graphics such as organizational charts, process maps, and/or budget tables as appropriate to increase the readability and professional appeal of the plan. Include in-text citations from at least six secondary sources.  Each person on the team must contribute an article from the research that was completed on product development or management processes, methodologies, and/or models. Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required. 1 Unsatisfactory 0.00% 2 Less than Satisfactory 65.00% 3 Satisfactory 75.00% 4 Good 85.00% 5 Excellent 100.00% 70.0 % Content 40.0 % Content Subject Knowledge: As a group, research and describe product or service tool, methodology, and model; select model; identify and explore product or service; create a description of product or service. Paper content omits the requirements stated in the assignment criteria. Innovation idea is outlined poorly and lacks research. Paper content omits some requirements stated in the assignment criteria. Innovation lacks supporting evidence and research. Paper content is complete. All assignment requirements are met. Innovation is outlined and supported with research. Paper content is comprehensive and accurate. All assignment criteria are met. Innovation is explained and supported with relevant research. Paper content is thoughtfully evaluated and accurate. All assignment criteria are met. Innovation is explained, analyzed, and supported with timely research and ideas. 30.0 % Content Comprehension Content is incomplete or omits most of the requirements stated in the assignment criteria Content is incomplete or omits some requirements stated in the assignment criteria. Content is complete, but could use additional development with specific detail. Research is inadequate in relevance, quality, and/or timeliness. Content is comprehensive and accurate, and definitions are clearly stated. Research is adequate, timely, and relevant, and addre.

1. Due Jan 24 15
In Phase 2, your team will work together to develop a detailed
description and implementation plan for the innovation you
selected to pursue in Module 3. Each team member must
research and describe a product development or management
process, methodology, or model that could be utilized to
implement the innovation. The group should select and use one
of these models for developing its own implementation plan.
For this assignment, write a paper of 2,000-3,000 words that
addresses the following:
Finalize the name and include a one- or two-sentence
description of the innovation.
Describe the value the new product or service will provide to
customers and describe the need it will meet.
Utilizing the model selected by the team, create the detailed
implementation plan for the innovation. Make sure the plan
accounts for contingencies/risks in the implementation process
and includes realistic timeframe and budgeting considerations.
Use graphics such as organizational charts, process maps,
and/or budget tables as appropriate to increase the readability
and professional appeal of the plan.
Include in-text citations from at least six secondary sources.
Each person on the team must contribute an article from the
research that was completed on product development or
management processes, methodologies, and/or models.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the
APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An
abstract is not required.

2. 1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
2
Less than Satisfactory
65.00%
3
Satisfactory
75.00%
4
Good
85.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
70.0 %
Content
40.0 %
Content Subject Knowledge: As a group, research and describe
product or service tool, methodology, and model; select model;
identify and explore product or service; create a description of
product or service.
Paper content omits the requirements stated in the assignment
criteria. Innovation idea is outlined poorly and lacks research.
Paper content omits some requirements stated in the assignment
criteria. Innovation lacks supporting evidence and research.
Paper content is complete. All assignment requirements are met.
Innovation is outlined and supported with research.
Paper content is comprehensive and accurate. All assignment
criteria are met. Innovation is explained and supported with
relevant research.
Paper content is thoughtfully evaluated and accurate. All

3. assignment criteria are met. Innovation is explained, analyzed,
and supported with timely research and ideas.
30.0 %
Content Comprehension
Content is incomplete or omits most of the requirements stated
in the assignment criteria
Content is incomplete or omits some requirements stated in the
assignment criteria.
Content is complete, but could use additional development with
specific detail. Research is inadequate in relevance, quality,
and/or timeliness.
Content is comprehensive and accurate, and definitions are
clearly stated. Research is adequate, timely, and relevant, and
addresses all of the issues stated in the assignment criteria.
Content is comprehensive, accurate, and persuasive; definitions
are clearly stated. Research is adequate, timely, and relevant,
and addresses all of the issues stated in the assignment criteria.
20.0 %
Participation and Effectiveness
15.0 %
Participation as Evident in the CLC Discussion Forum
Participation is not evident.
Posts do not encourage further discussion and dialogue with
other students in the class. Posts are critical, argumentative, or
confrontational. Individual group contributions are submitted
extremely late, affecting the group?s ability to accomplish a
successful task. Cooperative teamwork is not evident.
Most posts encourage further discussion and dialogue with other
students in the class. Posts are professional and exhibit a
positive attitude that is respectful of others. Individual
contributions are submitted but not on time. Cooperative
teamwork is exhibited but limited.
All posts encourage further discussion and dialogue with other

4. students in the class. Posts are professional and exhibit a
positive attitude that is respectful of others. Individual
contributions are provided by the designated timeline.
Cooperative teamwork is exhibited but not consistently.
All posts encourage further discussion and extensive dialogue
with other students in the class. Posts demonstrate a critical
analysis of classmates? postings and provide relevant and
constructive feedback. Individual contributions are provided
before the designated timeline. Cooperative teamwork is
exhibited in order to complete the project.
5.0 %
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar,
language use)
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede
communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or
sentence construction are used.
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader.
Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence
structure, and/or word choice are present.
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly
distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and
audience-appropriate language are used.
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may
be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective
figures of speech are used.
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic
English.
10.0 %
Format
10.0 %
Research Citations (In-text citations for paraphrasing and direct
quotes, and reference page listing and formatting, as appropriate
to assignment and style)

5. No reference page is included. No citations are used.
Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used.
Reference page is included and lists sources used in the paper.
Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors
may be present.
Reference page is present and fully inclusive of all cited
sources. Documentation is appropriate and citation style is
usually correct.
In-text citations and a reference page are complete and correct.
The documentation of cited sources is free of error.