CLC Group Values Part -1 (What do we need to do to ensure our team’s success?) What each team member agrees to do Why this is important to the team Check into the CLC regularly to review progress on the assignment Contribute ideas and feedback to the group from initial discussions throughout project completion Communicate with all CLC members as soon as a problem or issue arises Maintain respectful communications with all team members Complete assigned tasks by the deadlines set by the CLC members Take a leadership role in CLC assignments Make sure to cite and reference all sources of information used in completing tasks Other: Other: Project Management Specifics Part -2 (What needs to be undertaken to complete the CLC project?) CLC Group Member’s Name Task to be completed by this team member Due date for completing the task for the CLC to review My part Contributing one or more ideas for how the project should be completed My part Outlining the CLC project Assigning tasks to CLC members Performing research on assigned topics and writing it up for CLC members to review Making sure everyone meets their assigned deadlines for tasks Proofreading and editing the paper Submitting the paper via the Assignments feature by the due date deadline Other: Other: CLC Group Interaction Guidelines- part 3 (How can we anticipate and deal with group conflict when it arises?) What could happen to impede our teamwork What we will do if this happens A CLC member doesn’t provide project ideas or feedback to other team members A CLC member doesn’t complete his or her task at all A CLC member completes his or her task, but turns it in after the agreed-upon due date Other: Other: CLC Group Review Process –part 4 (What makes a CLC effective?) What did our CLC do well this time? What can we do to be a more effective CLC next time? · Created by GCU Faculty Training and Development March 15, 2013 Page 4 of 4 CLC - Performance Appraisal at Telespazio: Aligning Strategic Goals to People Development - Case Study  1 Unsatisfactory 0.00% 2 Less than Satisfactory 74.00% 3 Satisfactory 79.00% 4 Good 87.00% 5 Excellent 100.00% 70.0 %Content 20.0 %Current Appraisal Methods The description does not include the current appraisal method. The description includes the current appraisal method, but it is incomplete or lacks details. The description includes the current appraisal method and briefly identifies roles and performance ratings of employees. The description includes a detailed current appraisal method and identifies roles and performance ratings of employees with at least one example of current practices. The description includes a comprehensive appraisal method to include all required elements within the assignment with at least one example of current practices. 25.0 %Changes or Strategies for Telespazio The description does not include changes or strategies for the company. The description includes some changes or stra ...

1. CLC Group Values Part -1
(What do we need to do to ensure our team’s success?)
What each team member agrees to do
Why this is important to the team
Check into the CLC regularly to review progress on the
assignment
Contribute ideas and feedback to the group from initial
discussions throughout project completion
Communicate with all CLC members as soon as a problem or
issue arises
Maintain respectful communications with all team members
Complete assigned tasks by the deadlines set by the CLC
members
Take a leadership role in CLC assignments
Make sure to cite and reference all sources of information used
in completing tasks
Other:
Other:
Project Management Specifics Part -2
(What needs to be undertaken to complete the CLC project?)
CLC Group Member’s Name

2. Task to be completed by this team member
Due date for completing the task for the CLC to review
My part
Contributing one or more ideas for how the project should be
completed
My part
Outlining the CLC project
Assigning tasks to CLC members
Performing research on assigned topics and writing it up for
CLC members to review
Making sure everyone meets their assigned deadlines for tasks
Proofreading and editing the paper
Submitting the paper via the Assignments feature by the due
date deadline
Other:
Other:
CLC Group Interaction Guidelines- part 3
(How can we anticipate and deal with group conflict when it

3. arises?)
What could happen to impede our teamwork
What we will do if this happens
A CLC member doesn’t provide project ideas or feedback to
other team members
A CLC member doesn’t complete his or her task at all
A CLC member completes his or her task, but turns it in after
the agreed-upon due date
Other:
Other:
CLC Group Review Process –part 4
(What makes a CLC effective?)
What did our CLC do well this time?
What can we do to be a more effective CLC next time?
· Created by GCU Faculty Training and Development
March 15, 2013 Page 4 of 4
CLC - Performance Appraisal at Telespazio: Aligning Strategic
Goals to People Development - Case Study
1

4. Unsatisfactory
0.00%
2
Less than Satisfactory
74.00%
3
Satisfactory
79.00%
4
Good
87.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
70.0 %Content
20.0 %Current Appraisal Methods
The description does not include the current appraisal method.
The description includes the current appraisal method, but it is
incomplete or lacks details.
The description includes the current appraisal method and
briefly identifies roles and performance ratings of employees.
The description includes a detailed current appraisal method
and identifies roles and performance ratings of employees with
at least one example of current practices.
The description includes a comprehensive appraisal method to
include all required elements within the assignment with at least
one example of current practices.
25.0 %Changes or Strategies for Telespazio
The description does not include changes or strategies for the
company.
The description includes some changes or strategies for the
company, but they are incomplete or lack details.
The description includes changes or strategies for Telespazio to
implement for its performance appraisal practices.

5. The description includes detailed changes or strategies for
Telespazio to implement for its performance appraisal practices
and includes at least one example of the change.
The description includes detailed changes or strategies for
Telespazio to implement for its performance appraisal practices
and includes at least one example of the change.
25.0 %Appraisal Tool and Appraisal Interview
The description does not include appraisal tools or an appraisal
interview method.
The description includes either the appraisal tool or the
appraisal interview method, but it is incomplete or lacks details.
The description includes mention of both an appraisal tool and
an appraisal interview method to include in the performance
appraisal practices of the organization.
The description includes detailed suggestions for both an
appraisal tool and an appraisal interview method to include in
the performance appraisal practices of the organization.
The description includes thorough suggestions for both an
appraisal tool and an appraisal interview method to include in
the performance appraisal practices of the organization. In
addition, the description addresses the benefit of using the
appraisal tool and interview method as a part of the
performance appraisal practice.
20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness
7.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.
Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not
clear.
Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.
Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper.
Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and
appropriate to the purpose.
Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper.

6. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
8.0 %Argument Logic and Construction
Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The
conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is
incoherent and uses noncredible sources.
Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks
consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some
sources have questionable credibility.
Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The
argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument
logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources
used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the
thesis.
Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of
argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of
claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are
authoritative.
Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim
in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are
authoritative.
5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation,
grammar, language use)
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede
communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or
sentence construction is used.
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader.
Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are
present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not
overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence
structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may
be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence
structures and figures of speech.

7. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic
English.
10.0 %Format
5.0 %Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and
assignment)
Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is
rarely followed correctly.
Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or
mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.
Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although
some minor errors may be present.
Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors
in formatting style.
All format elements are correct.
5.0 %Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes,
references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and
style)
Sources are not documented.
Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as
appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting
errors.
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style,
although some formatting errors may be present.
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style,
and format is mostly correct.
Sources are completely and correctly documented, as
appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
100 %Total Weightage