CommonErrorsinWritingaResearchPaper
By
MUHAMMAD ANAS
Roll No.250 BSc (Hon) 7th
semester
Department ofPlant Breeding and Genetics
Submitted to
Prof. Dr. GULAM HASSAN SIR
The University of Agriculture PeshawarPakistan
CommonErrorsinWritinga ResearchPaper
RESEARCH
 Disciplineof research- basicscience /appliedscienceorsocial science
 Nature of research- qualitativeorquantitative
 Type of research- historical /survey/experimental /descriptive
Elements of Any Research Paper
Take the time to clearly outline yourresearchpaperbefore youbegintowrite,keepinmindwhateach
sectionneedstoaccomplish
 Title
 Abstracts
 Introduction
 Reviewsof literature
 Objective/s
 Hypothesis
 Methodology(sample/sample size/tools/dataanalysis)
 Resultanalysis
 Conclusion
 Implementations
Letting your deadline slip(procrastination)
 You nevermeantodo it,but somehow deadlinesoftencreepupoutof nowhere.
 For bigresearchpapers,try makinga timeline inyourplanner.
 Schedule datesthatyou’dlike tohave certaintaskscompleted(suchasyouroutline andthe first
draft),
 Andmaintainyourprogress.
Letting your deadline slip(procrastination)
“Chunking”
 “you maybe able todivide some of yourresearchtasksup intosmall chunkswhichcanbe
tackledwheneveryouhave atitle spare time.
 For example,if youtake photocopiesof materialsyouneedtoread.”
 Be sure to notwait until the lastminute toaskfor helpwiththingsyoushouldhave begunlong
ago, though.
Being Afraid To Ask For Help
 Everyone struggleswithresearchpaperwritingnow andagain.
 Professors,advisorsandlibrarianswillall be able eagertohelpyouorgive advice where they
can. Don’thesitate tocontact yourprofessorif you’re notsure how to get startedor how to
progresswithyourpaper;they’re there tohelpyou.
 Schedule ameetingandbringalongsome of the workyou’ve done sofar.
Lack of Research Before Choosing The Title
 Sometimes,whenstressedorbusy,students/researchscholarswill rushtheirselectionof a
subjectfora paper.
 As a result,theirfocusandconnectionwiththe subjectmattercansuffergreatly,andinevitably
thiscomesthroughin theirwriting.
 Doinggoodresearchand choosinga subjectforyoufeel youcan connectto are importantsteps
inwritinga successful thesisstatement,andultimatelyasuccessful paper.
Making Your Topic Too Broad
 Once you start developingideasforyourresearchpaper,tryto narrow yourfocusdowneven
further.
 Papersthat lackfocusonlyskimthe surface of a numberof conceptsbut neverdelve into
details.
 The thesisshould serve towpurposes,theyshouldguide youwhile youwrite andguide the
readerswhentheyread.
Limitations of the Study Are Not Acknowledged
 One mustmentionthe delimitationof the study.
 It islike outermostboundaryof your research.
 Your discussion sectiontellsreaderswhatyourstudyisall about.
 Includinglimitationsshowsathoroughevaluationof yourmethodsandresults.
PAPER THAT CONTAINS PLAGIARIZED CONTENT
 A paperthat containstextcopiedfromanotherpapermore or lessreduce yourchance of begin
accepted,dependingonthe amountof textthatyou copied.
 All the textinyour papersshouldbe writtenbyyourself only.
 It iseasyfor a reviewertodetectplagiarizedcontentusingthe internet.
PAPER THAT CONTAINS PLAGIARIZED CONTENT
 A paper that contains text copied from another paper more or less reduce your chance
of being accepted, depending on the amount of text that is copied.
 All the text in your papers should be written by yourself only.
 It is easy for a reviewer to detect plagiarized content using the internet.
PAPER THAT CONTAINS PLAGIARIZED CONTENT
 You must not use the ideas or words of others without giving the exact source;
 if you are found to have committed plagiarism, your paper will be rejected, and the case
will be reported.
 The worst kind of plagiarism at the moment is the cutting and pasting of (mostly bad
/inappropriate) passages from the internet and other’s work.
 It is just as bad to simply type off passages from published essays or books without
listing the authors whose texts you are using.
INCREMENTAL EXTENSION OF THE AUTHOR’S PREVIOUS WORK (SELF- PLAGIARISM)
 Where the author extended his own work, published just a few months/years ago.
 The problem with that paper was that the author just made a few minor changes before
submitting it as a new paper.
 A new paper should present on a same topic should present at least 30 to 40 % new
content and there should be a significant difference with the previous work.
OVER-LENGTH PAPERS
 When a paper is submitted to a conference or journal, there is generally a page limit.
 If the page limit is not respected, several reviewers will not like it.
 The reason is that reviewers are generally very busy, and they have to review many
papers.
 Reviewers should not have to spend more time reading a paper because someone did
not want to spend time to make it fit within the page limit.
DELETE ANY PARAGRAPH WITHOUT CONSIDERING IT’S IMPORTANCE IN A PAPER
 When asked to reduce size of paper, this is the most common practice.
PROOFREADING AND UNREADABLE PAPERS
 A paper should be well-written, and the author(s) proofread it before submitting it.
 Sometimes we come across some unreadable paper that look like they were
automatically translated by Google.
 (This is a guaranteed reject.)
NOT USING THE PROPER FORMAT
 Grantham, for instance, has adopted a system- wide protocol that all papers should be in
APA format.
 APA format is very similar. It is a format that starts with a running head, a title page,
certain margins, certain font – and it standardizes everything.
 Don’t be afraid to check out the OWL Purdue site.
 IEEE format APA format MLA format.
THE RESEARCH QUESTION IS NOT ANSWERED
 Because the discussion section allows for the most freedom, it also can be the most
difficult section to write.
 Before you start this section, go back to your research question and think about how you
want to answer it.
 Revisit your research question frequently while writing the discussion.
NOT USING PROPER CITATION
 If you use someone’s exact words, wrap that thing in quotes and put a bow on top of it
with a proper internal citation.
 If you paraphrase, you still have to put the bow on it – but you can leave the wrapping
paper at home.
 When writing a paper, it is recommended to add a few newer references in your paper to
show that you are aware of the newest research.
NOT USING PROPER CITATION
 Several reviewers check the dates of the references when evaluating a paper. For
example, I have read a paper recently where all references where from before 2016.
 This is a bad sign, since it is unlikely that nothing has happened in a given field since
2016.
 Follow proper style of Citation for your bibliography and Reference section.
 APA Style, MLA Style, Chicago Style.
POOR ORGANIZATION / PARAGRAPHS SHOULD FLOW NATURALLY
 It is important that the various parts of the research papers are connected by a “flow”.
 What I mean is that when the reviewer is reading your paper, each section or paragraph
should feel logically connected the previous and next paragraphs.
FIGURES/CHARTS THAT DO NOT LOOK GOOD OR ARE TOO SMALL
 About charts, it is important to make them look good.
 Besides, a second mistake is to make the charts or figures so small that they become
unreadable.
 If the reviewer prints your paper to read it, he should be able to read the text without
using a magnifying glass.
 Moreover, it should not be expected that the reviewer will read the PDF version of your
paper and can zoom in.
FIGURES THAT ARE IRRELEVANT
 In some papers,authorsputa lot of figuresthatare irrelevant.
 For example, if a figure can be summarized with one or two lines of text, it is better to
remove it.
POOR GRAMMAR & IMPROPER USE OF LANGUAGE
 Take help of your teacher/guide or subject expert or colleague at any point in your
writing, especially when you’re polishing and finalizing your research paper.
 Confirm about proper use of correct Spellings, Punctuation marks, Capitalization.
 Proper use of grammar should be there.
TRUSTING THE COMPUTER TO SPELL-CHECK
 Just because you’ve managed to avoid those red squiggles while typing your research
paper doesn’t mean your paper is error-free.
 Your computer won’t always let you know when you’ve used the wrong form of a word
such as “you’re” or “their” but your professor/guide certainly will.
 Carefully read over your entire paper when you’ve finished to be sure you’ve avoided
simple spelling and grammar mistakes.
 You must hate making silly mistakes.
BEING SNEAKY
 Changing the margins?
 Adjusting the line spacing?
 Altering the font size ever so slightly?
 Resist the temptation to do this.
IRRELEVANT INFORMATION
 Some papers contain irrelevant information or information that is not really important.
 For example, if your paper is a data mining paper submitted to a data mining or artificial
intelligence conference, it is not necessary to explain what data mining is.
 It can be assumed that the reviewers who are specialist in their field know what is “data
mining”
 Another example is to mention irrelevant details such as to why a given software was
used to make charts.
A RESEARCH PAPER IS NOT “CONNECT THE QUOTES
 Some students/ researchers believe that a research paper is 30-40% quotations – and
they simply connect commentary between each additional quote. That’s not the way
research papers work.
 Good research papers should synthesize material.
 Use original quotes sparingly and avoid the temptation to play connect the quotes.
NOT HAVING A FRIEND READ IT OVER / EDITING /REVIEWING
 Sometimes after you’ve spent so many hours and days on a research paper, your
exhausted eyes can start to miss things. Concepts that may make sense to you after
doing all your research may not make sense to anyone else.
 Have someone else do a read-through of your paper, even if it’s a quick one, to make
sure that your paragraphs are coherent, and you haven’t made any obvious mistakes.
 Also, consider visiting your guide or subject expert for further help if they offer one. The
more reviews, the better.

Common errors in writing a research paper

  • 1.
    CommonErrorsinWritingaResearchPaper By MUHAMMAD ANAS Roll No.250BSc (Hon) 7th semester Department ofPlant Breeding and Genetics Submitted to Prof. Dr. GULAM HASSAN SIR The University of Agriculture PeshawarPakistan
  • 2.
    CommonErrorsinWritinga ResearchPaper RESEARCH  Disciplineofresearch- basicscience /appliedscienceorsocial science  Nature of research- qualitativeorquantitative  Type of research- historical /survey/experimental /descriptive Elements of Any Research Paper Take the time to clearly outline yourresearchpaperbefore youbegintowrite,keepinmindwhateach sectionneedstoaccomplish  Title  Abstracts  Introduction  Reviewsof literature  Objective/s  Hypothesis  Methodology(sample/sample size/tools/dataanalysis)  Resultanalysis  Conclusion  Implementations Letting your deadline slip(procrastination)  You nevermeantodo it,but somehow deadlinesoftencreepupoutof nowhere.  For bigresearchpapers,try makinga timeline inyourplanner.  Schedule datesthatyou’dlike tohave certaintaskscompleted(suchasyouroutline andthe first draft),  Andmaintainyourprogress. Letting your deadline slip(procrastination) “Chunking”  “you maybe able todivide some of yourresearchtasksup intosmall chunkswhichcanbe tackledwheneveryouhave atitle spare time.  For example,if youtake photocopiesof materialsyouneedtoread.”  Be sure to notwait until the lastminute toaskfor helpwiththingsyoushouldhave begunlong ago, though. Being Afraid To Ask For Help  Everyone struggleswithresearchpaperwritingnow andagain.
  • 3.
     Professors,advisorsandlibrarianswillall beable eagertohelpyouorgive advice where they can. Don’thesitate tocontact yourprofessorif you’re notsure how to get startedor how to progresswithyourpaper;they’re there tohelpyou.  Schedule ameetingandbringalongsome of the workyou’ve done sofar. Lack of Research Before Choosing The Title  Sometimes,whenstressedorbusy,students/researchscholarswill rushtheirselectionof a subjectfora paper.  As a result,theirfocusandconnectionwiththe subjectmattercansuffergreatly,andinevitably thiscomesthroughin theirwriting.  Doinggoodresearchand choosinga subjectforyoufeel youcan connectto are importantsteps inwritinga successful thesisstatement,andultimatelyasuccessful paper. Making Your Topic Too Broad  Once you start developingideasforyourresearchpaper,tryto narrow yourfocusdowneven further.  Papersthat lackfocusonlyskimthe surface of a numberof conceptsbut neverdelve into details.  The thesisshould serve towpurposes,theyshouldguide youwhile youwrite andguide the readerswhentheyread. Limitations of the Study Are Not Acknowledged  One mustmentionthe delimitationof the study.  It islike outermostboundaryof your research.  Your discussion sectiontellsreaderswhatyourstudyisall about.  Includinglimitationsshowsathoroughevaluationof yourmethodsandresults. PAPER THAT CONTAINS PLAGIARIZED CONTENT  A paperthat containstextcopiedfromanotherpapermore or lessreduce yourchance of begin accepted,dependingonthe amountof textthatyou copied.  All the textinyour papersshouldbe writtenbyyourself only.  It iseasyfor a reviewertodetectplagiarizedcontentusingthe internet. PAPER THAT CONTAINS PLAGIARIZED CONTENT  A paper that contains text copied from another paper more or less reduce your chance of being accepted, depending on the amount of text that is copied.  All the text in your papers should be written by yourself only.  It is easy for a reviewer to detect plagiarized content using the internet. PAPER THAT CONTAINS PLAGIARIZED CONTENT  You must not use the ideas or words of others without giving the exact source;  if you are found to have committed plagiarism, your paper will be rejected, and the case will be reported.
  • 4.
     The worstkind of plagiarism at the moment is the cutting and pasting of (mostly bad /inappropriate) passages from the internet and other’s work.  It is just as bad to simply type off passages from published essays or books without listing the authors whose texts you are using. INCREMENTAL EXTENSION OF THE AUTHOR’S PREVIOUS WORK (SELF- PLAGIARISM)  Where the author extended his own work, published just a few months/years ago.  The problem with that paper was that the author just made a few minor changes before submitting it as a new paper.  A new paper should present on a same topic should present at least 30 to 40 % new content and there should be a significant difference with the previous work. OVER-LENGTH PAPERS  When a paper is submitted to a conference or journal, there is generally a page limit.  If the page limit is not respected, several reviewers will not like it.  The reason is that reviewers are generally very busy, and they have to review many papers.  Reviewers should not have to spend more time reading a paper because someone did not want to spend time to make it fit within the page limit. DELETE ANY PARAGRAPH WITHOUT CONSIDERING IT’S IMPORTANCE IN A PAPER  When asked to reduce size of paper, this is the most common practice. PROOFREADING AND UNREADABLE PAPERS  A paper should be well-written, and the author(s) proofread it before submitting it.  Sometimes we come across some unreadable paper that look like they were automatically translated by Google.  (This is a guaranteed reject.) NOT USING THE PROPER FORMAT  Grantham, for instance, has adopted a system- wide protocol that all papers should be in APA format.  APA format is very similar. It is a format that starts with a running head, a title page, certain margins, certain font – and it standardizes everything.  Don’t be afraid to check out the OWL Purdue site.  IEEE format APA format MLA format. THE RESEARCH QUESTION IS NOT ANSWERED  Because the discussion section allows for the most freedom, it also can be the most difficult section to write.  Before you start this section, go back to your research question and think about how you want to answer it.  Revisit your research question frequently while writing the discussion. NOT USING PROPER CITATION  If you use someone’s exact words, wrap that thing in quotes and put a bow on top of it with a proper internal citation.
  • 5.
     If youparaphrase, you still have to put the bow on it – but you can leave the wrapping paper at home.  When writing a paper, it is recommended to add a few newer references in your paper to show that you are aware of the newest research. NOT USING PROPER CITATION  Several reviewers check the dates of the references when evaluating a paper. For example, I have read a paper recently where all references where from before 2016.  This is a bad sign, since it is unlikely that nothing has happened in a given field since 2016.  Follow proper style of Citation for your bibliography and Reference section.  APA Style, MLA Style, Chicago Style. POOR ORGANIZATION / PARAGRAPHS SHOULD FLOW NATURALLY  It is important that the various parts of the research papers are connected by a “flow”.  What I mean is that when the reviewer is reading your paper, each section or paragraph should feel logically connected the previous and next paragraphs. FIGURES/CHARTS THAT DO NOT LOOK GOOD OR ARE TOO SMALL  About charts, it is important to make them look good.  Besides, a second mistake is to make the charts or figures so small that they become unreadable.  If the reviewer prints your paper to read it, he should be able to read the text without using a magnifying glass.  Moreover, it should not be expected that the reviewer will read the PDF version of your paper and can zoom in. FIGURES THAT ARE IRRELEVANT  In some papers,authorsputa lot of figuresthatare irrelevant.  For example, if a figure can be summarized with one or two lines of text, it is better to remove it. POOR GRAMMAR & IMPROPER USE OF LANGUAGE  Take help of your teacher/guide or subject expert or colleague at any point in your writing, especially when you’re polishing and finalizing your research paper.  Confirm about proper use of correct Spellings, Punctuation marks, Capitalization.  Proper use of grammar should be there. TRUSTING THE COMPUTER TO SPELL-CHECK  Just because you’ve managed to avoid those red squiggles while typing your research paper doesn’t mean your paper is error-free.  Your computer won’t always let you know when you’ve used the wrong form of a word such as “you’re” or “their” but your professor/guide certainly will.  Carefully read over your entire paper when you’ve finished to be sure you’ve avoided simple spelling and grammar mistakes.  You must hate making silly mistakes.
  • 6.
    BEING SNEAKY  Changingthe margins?  Adjusting the line spacing?  Altering the font size ever so slightly?  Resist the temptation to do this. IRRELEVANT INFORMATION  Some papers contain irrelevant information or information that is not really important.  For example, if your paper is a data mining paper submitted to a data mining or artificial intelligence conference, it is not necessary to explain what data mining is.  It can be assumed that the reviewers who are specialist in their field know what is “data mining”  Another example is to mention irrelevant details such as to why a given software was used to make charts. A RESEARCH PAPER IS NOT “CONNECT THE QUOTES  Some students/ researchers believe that a research paper is 30-40% quotations – and they simply connect commentary between each additional quote. That’s not the way research papers work.  Good research papers should synthesize material.  Use original quotes sparingly and avoid the temptation to play connect the quotes. NOT HAVING A FRIEND READ IT OVER / EDITING /REVIEWING  Sometimes after you’ve spent so many hours and days on a research paper, your exhausted eyes can start to miss things. Concepts that may make sense to you after doing all your research may not make sense to anyone else.  Have someone else do a read-through of your paper, even if it’s a quick one, to make sure that your paragraphs are coherent, and you haven’t made any obvious mistakes.  Also, consider visiting your guide or subject expert for further help if they offer one. The more reviews, the better.