This document discusses treatment options for colorectal liver metastases, including systemic chemotherapy, surgical resection, chemoembolization, radioembolization, and portal vein embolization. It notes that systemic chemotherapy alone yields a median survival of 18-21 months but can downstage liver metastases to resectability in 20-25% of cases, resulting in a 5-year survival of 33%. Chemoembolization and radioembolization clinical trials demonstrate median survival ranges of 9-21 months. The document emphasizes the importance of the interventional oncologist in multidisciplinary care to increase the potential for curative resection through downstaging or portal vein embolization.
This slide deck has been created for clinician use in creating presentations detailing Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases, the Selective Internal Radiation Therapy (SIRT) procedure available to treat this condition, supported by the clinical data that supports this treatment and and ongoing RCT trials to further document the success of this treatment. This information maybe used in its entirety or in sections, according to the material being presented and the audience to which it will be used. The sections included in this slide deck are as follows:
Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases (mCRC)
Overview Selective Internal Radiation Therapy (SIRT)
Overview SIR-Spheres(r) microspheres
Clinical Data in mCRC Ongoing Level 1 RCT for mCRC in the liver
This slide deck has been created for clinician use in creating presentations detailing Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases, the Selective Internal Radiation Therapy (SIRT) procedure available to treat this condition, supported by the clinical data that supports this treatment and and ongoing RCT trials to further document the success of this treatment. This information maybe used in its entirety or in sections, according to the material being presented and the audience to which it will be used. The sections included in this slide deck are as follows:
Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases (mCRC)
Overview Selective Internal Radiation Therapy (SIRT)
Overview SIR-Spheres(r) microspheres
Clinical Data in mCRC Ongoing Level 1 RCT for mCRC in the liver
What would you recommend as first line therapy for a 68 y/o woman with local pancreatic cancer and no metastatic disease with ECOG-1?
Chemoradiation: Rachna Shroff, MD
Surgical Resection: Yongyut Sirivatanauksorn, MD
This is an overview of the adjuvant Tx of pancreatic CA. A Lecture that was given in the annual conference of NCI Egypt: 45 years against cancer in Egypt. Cairo, April, 2013
Chair and Presenter, Prof Eric Van Cutsem, MD, PhD, and Scott Kopetz, MD, PhD, prepared useful Practice Aids pertaining to colorectal cancer for this CME/MOC/NCPD activity titled “Putting a Personalized Colorectal Cancer Treatment Algorithm Into Practice: Navigating Practicalities in the Era of Molecularly Defined Care.” For the full presentation, downloadable Practice Aids, and complete CME/MOC/NCPD information, and to apply for credit, please visit us at https://bit.ly/3aSSAtm. CME/MOC/NCPD credit will be available until November 13, 2022.
Each summer, the American Society for Clinical Oncology holds the world’s largest conference for cancer researchers, doctors and other medical professionals. Results from clinical trials and other studies are released, which give scientists a fresh look at treatments that may or may not hold great promise in the march toward a cure for cancer.
Dr. Axel Grothey of the Mayo Clinic will explain what science is now telling us about colorectal cancer and how it may impact your treatment in the near future.
What would you recommend as first line therapy for a 68 y/o woman with local pancreatic cancer and no metastatic disease with ECOG-1?
Chemoradiation: Rachna Shroff, MD
Surgical Resection: Yongyut Sirivatanauksorn, MD
This is an overview of the adjuvant Tx of pancreatic CA. A Lecture that was given in the annual conference of NCI Egypt: 45 years against cancer in Egypt. Cairo, April, 2013
Chair and Presenter, Prof Eric Van Cutsem, MD, PhD, and Scott Kopetz, MD, PhD, prepared useful Practice Aids pertaining to colorectal cancer for this CME/MOC/NCPD activity titled “Putting a Personalized Colorectal Cancer Treatment Algorithm Into Practice: Navigating Practicalities in the Era of Molecularly Defined Care.” For the full presentation, downloadable Practice Aids, and complete CME/MOC/NCPD information, and to apply for credit, please visit us at https://bit.ly/3aSSAtm. CME/MOC/NCPD credit will be available until November 13, 2022.
Each summer, the American Society for Clinical Oncology holds the world’s largest conference for cancer researchers, doctors and other medical professionals. Results from clinical trials and other studies are released, which give scientists a fresh look at treatments that may or may not hold great promise in the march toward a cure for cancer.
Dr. Axel Grothey of the Mayo Clinic will explain what science is now telling us about colorectal cancer and how it may impact your treatment in the near future.
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of histopathological factors influencing ...Jorge Vasquez Del Aguila
Discusión de artículo: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of histopathological factors influencing the lymph node metastases in early colorectal cancer
Sesión de la Unidad de Coloproctología
Hospital Vall d' Hebron
Alphabet Soup - Biomarker testing for colon and rectal cancer patients - KRAS...Fight Colorectal Cancer
Dr. Cathy Eng's presentation regarding biomarkers. Explaining why colon and rectal cancer patients should undergo testing for KRAS, NRAS and other tumor tests.
Tonight’s speakers: Dr. Dan Sargent and Kim Ryan
Disclaimer: “This Report is not an official event of the 2012 Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium. Not sponsored or endorsed by any of the cosponsoring organizations of the 2012 Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium.”
Squeezing Dr. Coleman: the answers with key evidenceMauricio Lema
Q&A session with Dr. Rob Coleman on practical issues, and treatmente patterns in ovarian cancer.
4th International Congress - Clinical de Oncología Astorga, Panamá, 27-29 de Junio, 2019
El futuro del tratamiento del cáncer renal metastásico: inmunoterapia y terap...Mauricio Lema
Ponencia en el primer simposio de la Asociación Colombiana de Hematología y Oncología (ACHO) de cáncer genitourinario, Bogotá, septiembre 23 y 24 de 2016.
Cette présentation faite le 27 Avril 2017 à l'Hôpital Saint Joseph organisée par le Dr Vincent de Parades fait le point sur les nouvelles approches multidisciplinaires dans la prise en charge des cancers colorectaux en insistant sur la prise en charge de la maladie métastatique hépatique et de la carcinome péritonéale pour terminer sur les nouvelles approches par immunothérapie. Cette EPU a connu un large succès d'audience avec plus de 60 participants. Merci à toutes et tous.
Report Back from SGO 2024: What’s the Latest in Cervical Cancer?bkling
Are you curious about what’s new in cervical cancer research or unsure what the findings mean? Join Dr. Emily Ko, a gynecologic oncologist at Penn Medicine, to learn about the latest updates from the Society of Gynecologic Oncology (SGO) 2024 Annual Meeting on Women’s Cancer. Dr. Ko will discuss what the research presented at the conference means for you and answer your questions about the new developments.
MANAGEMENT OF ATRIOVENTRICULAR CONDUCTION BLOCK.pdfJim Jacob Roy
Cardiac conduction defects can occur due to various causes.
Atrioventricular conduction blocks ( AV blocks ) are classified into 3 types.
This document describes the acute management of AV block.
New Drug Discovery and Development .....NEHA GUPTA
The "New Drug Discovery and Development" process involves the identification, design, testing, and manufacturing of novel pharmaceutical compounds with the aim of introducing new and improved treatments for various medical conditions. This comprehensive endeavor encompasses various stages, including target identification, preclinical studies, clinical trials, regulatory approval, and post-market surveillance. It involves multidisciplinary collaboration among scientists, researchers, clinicians, regulatory experts, and pharmaceutical companies to bring innovative therapies to market and address unmet medical needs.
Title: Sense of Taste
Presenter: Dr. Faiza, Assistant Professor of Physiology
Qualifications:
MBBS (Best Graduate, AIMC Lahore)
FCPS Physiology
ICMT, CHPE, DHPE (STMU)
MPH (GC University, Faisalabad)
MBA (Virtual University of Pakistan)
Learning Objectives:
Describe the structure and function of taste buds.
Describe the relationship between the taste threshold and taste index of common substances.
Explain the chemical basis and signal transduction of taste perception for each type of primary taste sensation.
Recognize different abnormalities of taste perception and their causes.
Key Topics:
Significance of Taste Sensation:
Differentiation between pleasant and harmful food
Influence on behavior
Selection of food based on metabolic needs
Receptors of Taste:
Taste buds on the tongue
Influence of sense of smell, texture of food, and pain stimulation (e.g., by pepper)
Primary and Secondary Taste Sensations:
Primary taste sensations: Sweet, Sour, Salty, Bitter, Umami
Chemical basis and signal transduction mechanisms for each taste
Taste Threshold and Index:
Taste threshold values for Sweet (sucrose), Salty (NaCl), Sour (HCl), and Bitter (Quinine)
Taste index relationship: Inversely proportional to taste threshold
Taste Blindness:
Inability to taste certain substances, particularly thiourea compounds
Example: Phenylthiocarbamide
Structure and Function of Taste Buds:
Composition: Epithelial cells, Sustentacular/Supporting cells, Taste cells, Basal cells
Features: Taste pores, Taste hairs/microvilli, and Taste nerve fibers
Location of Taste Buds:
Found in papillae of the tongue (Fungiform, Circumvallate, Foliate)
Also present on the palate, tonsillar pillars, epiglottis, and proximal esophagus
Mechanism of Taste Stimulation:
Interaction of taste substances with receptors on microvilli
Signal transduction pathways for Umami, Sweet, Bitter, Sour, and Salty tastes
Taste Sensitivity and Adaptation:
Decrease in sensitivity with age
Rapid adaptation of taste sensation
Role of Saliva in Taste:
Dissolution of tastants to reach receptors
Washing away the stimulus
Taste Preferences and Aversions:
Mechanisms behind taste preference and aversion
Influence of receptors and neural pathways
Impact of Sensory Nerve Damage:
Degeneration of taste buds if the sensory nerve fiber is cut
Abnormalities of Taste Detection:
Conditions: Ageusia, Hypogeusia, Dysgeusia (parageusia)
Causes: Nerve damage, neurological disorders, infections, poor oral hygiene, adverse drug effects, deficiencies, aging, tobacco use, altered neurotransmitter levels
Neurotransmitters and Taste Threshold:
Effects of serotonin (5-HT) and norepinephrine (NE) on taste sensitivity
Supertasters:
25% of the population with heightened sensitivity to taste, especially bitterness
Increased number of fungiform papillae
Flu Vaccine Alert in Bangalore Karnatakaaddon Scans
As flu season approaches, health officials in Bangalore, Karnataka, are urging residents to get their flu vaccinations. The seasonal flu, while common, can lead to severe health complications, particularly for vulnerable populations such as young children, the elderly, and those with underlying health conditions.
Dr. Vidisha Kumari, a leading epidemiologist in Bangalore, emphasizes the importance of getting vaccinated. "The flu vaccine is our best defense against the influenza virus. It not only protects individuals but also helps prevent the spread of the virus in our communities," he says.
This year, the flu season is expected to coincide with a potential increase in other respiratory illnesses. The Karnataka Health Department has launched an awareness campaign highlighting the significance of flu vaccinations. They have set up multiple vaccination centers across Bangalore, making it convenient for residents to receive their shots.
To encourage widespread vaccination, the government is also collaborating with local schools, workplaces, and community centers to facilitate vaccination drives. Special attention is being given to ensuring that the vaccine is accessible to all, including marginalized communities who may have limited access to healthcare.
Residents are reminded that the flu vaccine is safe and effective. Common side effects are mild and may include soreness at the injection site, mild fever, or muscle aches. These side effects are generally short-lived and far less severe than the flu itself.
Healthcare providers are also stressing the importance of continuing COVID-19 precautions. Wearing masks, practicing good hand hygiene, and maintaining social distancing are still crucial, especially in crowded places.
Protect yourself and your loved ones by getting vaccinated. Together, we can help keep Bangalore healthy and safe this flu season. For more information on vaccination centers and schedules, residents can visit the Karnataka Health Department’s official website or follow their social media pages.
Stay informed, stay safe, and get your flu shot today!
TEST BANK for Operations Management, 14th Edition by William J. Stevenson, Ve...kevinkariuki227
TEST BANK for Operations Management, 14th Edition by William J. Stevenson, Verified Chapters 1 - 19, Complete Newest Version.pdf
TEST BANK for Operations Management, 14th Edition by William J. Stevenson, Verified Chapters 1 - 19, Complete Newest Version.pdf
Ethanol (CH3CH2OH), or beverage alcohol, is a two-carbon alcohol
that is rapidly distributed in the body and brain. Ethanol alters many
neurochemical systems and has rewarding and addictive properties. It
is the oldest recreational drug and likely contributes to more morbidity,
mortality, and public health costs than all illicit drugs combined. The
5th edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
(DSM-5) integrates alcohol abuse and alcohol dependence into a single
disorder called alcohol use disorder (AUD), with mild, moderate,
and severe subclassifications (American Psychiatric Association, 2013).
In the DSM-5, all types of substance abuse and dependence have been
combined into a single substance use disorder (SUD) on a continuum
from mild to severe. A diagnosis of AUD requires that at least two of
the 11 DSM-5 behaviors be present within a 12-month period (mild
AUD: 2–3 criteria; moderate AUD: 4–5 criteria; severe AUD: 6–11 criteria).
The four main behavioral effects of AUD are impaired control over
drinking, negative social consequences, risky use, and altered physiological
effects (tolerance, withdrawal). This chapter presents an overview
of the prevalence and harmful consequences of AUD in the U.S.,
the systemic nature of the disease, neurocircuitry and stages of AUD,
comorbidities, fetal alcohol spectrum disorders, genetic risk factors, and
pharmacotherapies for AUD.
1. Colorectal Liver Metastases
What the IO Needs to Know
Michael C. Soulen, MD FSIR FCIRSE
Professor of Radiology & Surgery
University of Pennsylvania
2. Metastatic Colon CancerMetastatic Colon Cancer
The OptionsThe Options
No therapyNo therapy
median survival 7-8 monthsmedian survival 7-8 months
ResectionResection
25%-40% 5-year survival25%-40% 5-year survival
Systemic TherapySystemic Therapy
• 18-20 month median survival with sequential FOLFOX-18-20 month median survival with sequential FOLFOX-
FOLFIRI and Avastin, +/- EGFR inhibitor.FOLFIRI and Avastin, +/- EGFR inhibitor.
• Longer for liver-only disease (including downstaging).Longer for liver-only disease (including downstaging).
3. Metastatic Colon CancerMetastatic Colon Cancer
NCCN/ESMO GuidelinesNCCN/ESMO Guidelines
www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/colon.pdfwww.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/colon.pdf
www.esmo.org/Guidelines-Practice/Clinical-Practice-www.esmo.org/Guidelines-Practice/Clinical-Practice-
Guidelines/Gastrointestinal-Cancers/Advanced-Colorectal-CancerGuidelines/Gastrointestinal-Cancers/Advanced-Colorectal-Cancer
www.esmo.org/Guidelines-Practice/Clinical-Practice-www.esmo.org/Guidelines-Practice/Clinical-Practice-
Guidelines/Gastrointestinal-Cancers/Advanced-Colorectal-CancerGuidelines/Gastrointestinal-Cancers/Advanced-Colorectal-Cancer• Need to know these!Need to know these!
– ““talk the talk” at tumor boardstalk the talk” at tumor boards
– Advise patients of all options for disease progressionAdvise patients of all options for disease progression
– Recognize impact on IO and surgical proceduresRecognize impact on IO and surgical procedures
• 11stst
-line:-line: FOLFOX or FOLFIRI, +/- AvastinFOLFOX or FOLFIRI, +/- Avastin
(bevacizumab)(bevacizumab)
• Vectibix (panitumumab)/Erbitux (cetuximab) forVectibix (panitumumab)/Erbitux (cetuximab) for
KRAS/BRAF wild-type genotypeKRAS/BRAF wild-type genotype
– approx. 40% KRAS mutant, another 5%-10% BRAF mutantapprox. 40% KRAS mutant, another 5%-10% BRAF mutant
• 22ndnd
-line:-line: the other triplet, +/- EGFR inhibitor +/-the other triplet, +/- EGFR inhibitor +/-
AvastinAvastin
4. Systemic ChemotherapySystemic Chemotherapy
Need to know the benefitNeed to know the benefit
•Response rates 40%-60%Response rates 40%-60%
– Downstaging to resectability in 20%-25%!Downstaging to resectability in 20%-25%!
– 5-year survival after downstaging to resection 33%!!5-year survival after downstaging to resection 33%!!
•PFS 1st-line 7-9 monthsPFS 1st-line 7-9 months
•PFS 2nd-line 3-5 monthsPFS 2nd-line 3-5 months
•OS unresected 18-21 monthsOS unresected 18-21 months
•Adam R, Delvart V, Pascal G, et al: Rescue surgery for unresectable colorectal liverAdam R, Delvart V, Pascal G, et al: Rescue surgery for unresectable colorectal liver
metastases down-staged by chemotherapy: A model to predict long-term survival. Ann Surgmetastases down-staged by chemotherapy: A model to predict long-term survival. Ann Surg
240:644-657, 2004240:644-657, 2004
•Delaunoit T, Alberts SR, Sargent DJ, et al: Chemotherapy permits resection of metastaticDelaunoit T, Alberts SR, Sargent DJ, et al: Chemotherapy permits resection of metastatic
colorectal cancer: Experience from Intergroup N9741. Ann Oncol 16:425-429, 2005colorectal cancer: Experience from Intergroup N9741. Ann Oncol 16:425-429, 2005
5. Systemic ChemotherapySystemic Chemotherapy
• Need to know the toxicitiesNeed to know the toxicities
– Oxaliplatin: neuropathy, “blue” liver, marrowOxaliplatin: neuropathy, “blue” liver, marrow
– Irinotecan : diarrhea, “yellow” liver, marrowIrinotecan : diarrhea, “yellow” liver, marrow
– 5-FU: mucositis, diarrhea, marrow5-FU: mucositis, diarrhea, marrow
– cetuximab - rashcetuximab - rash
– bevacizumab - HTN, proteinuria, wound healing,bevacizumab - HTN, proteinuria, wound healing,
bowel perforation, bleeding, thrombosisbowel perforation, bleeding, thrombosis
– >6 months chemo increases risk of liver failure with>6 months chemo increases risk of liver failure with
resectionresection
required FLR increases from 25% to 40%required FLR increases from 25% to 40%
– Avastin : Hold two weeks for chest portsAvastin : Hold two weeks for chest ports
Probably unimportant for embolizationProbably unimportant for embolization
9. Two 10cm metastases
What would you advise?
•chemotherapy
•resection
•chemoembolization
•radioembolization
•portal vein embolization
10. The most important question!The most important question!
Are they resectable?
Can you make them resectable?
Look at the cheese, not just the holes!
A good relationship with a surgical oncologist is good for your
patients and for your practice!
Chemo + PVE
11. 16 mets in 7 segments
courtesy D. Madoff, MDACC
12. 3 mo chemo, 1st-stage
hepatectomy to clear segs 2/3
FF
LL
RR
13. PVE right lobe + seg 4
2nd-stage extended R hepatectomy
2nd-stage extended R hepatectomy
21. Survival by ECOG Performance StatusSurvival by ECOG Performance Status
Performance Status
0: 11 months
>0: 3 months
p>0.001
HR= 0.46 (95% CI 0.15- 0.61)
22. Survival by Systemic EraSurvival by Systemic Era
Pre-irinotecan
Pre-bevacizumab
Post-bevacizumab
26. DEBIRI International RegistryDEBIRI International Registry
Martin RC, et al. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011 Jan;18(1):192-8
Martin RC, et al. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011 Jan;18(1):192-8
•55 patients with mCRC
•Median irinotecan dose = 100 mg (range 100-200 mg) with total
hepatic treatment of 200 mg (range 200-650 mg)
•30% received concurrent systemic chemotherapy
•Adverse events: 28% of patients with median grade of 2 (range
1-3) with no deaths at 30 days post procedure
•Response rate: 75% at 12 months
•OS =19 months median
•Progression-free survival = 11 months median
27. Phase 3 Trial of DEBIRI vs. FOLFIRIPhase 3 Trial of DEBIRI vs. FOLFIRI
Anticancer Res 2012;32:1387-96
28. Intraarterial Therapy with Yttrium 90:Intraarterial Therapy with Yttrium 90:
TheraSpheres and SIR-SpheresTheraSpheres and SIR-Spheres
29. Phase 3 Trial 5-FU +/- Y90
• 46 Patients randomized to infusional 5
FU +/- Y90
• Primary endpoint TTLP
• 2.1 vs 5.5 mo with Y90
30. Med OS 11.9 vs. 6.3 mo
Bester et al. JVIR 2012
Radioembolization for salvage therapy
33. ConclusionConclusion
• The Interventional Oncologist is an essentialThe Interventional Oncologist is an essential
member of the colorectal cancer teammember of the colorectal cancer team
• IO procedures can increase the potential forIO procedures can increase the potential for
curative resectioncurative resection
• Adding intra-arterial therapies providesAdding intra-arterial therapies provides
survival better than expected from systemicsurvival better than expected from systemic
therapy alonetherapy alone
• Integration with other therapeutic modalitiesIntegration with other therapeutic modalities
key to maximizing long-term outcomes.key to maximizing long-term outcomes.
Editor's Notes
1st 4 US trials, all same response and survival
Median survival time from diagnosis of liver metastases
Survival was significantly better when chemoembolization was performed following
first- or second-line systemic therapy than as rescue therapy after 3-5th lines of chemotherapy (p=0.03).
1 year survival dropped from 41% and 42% after 0, 1, 2 lines of systemic chemo to 12% after 3 or more lines.
Subgroup analysis was performed based on the presence of extrahepatic disease at the time
Of first CE
There was no difference in survival between patients with or without extrahepatic
metastases (p=0.265).
Median survival time for those without extrahepatic disease was 11 months from
time of initial chemoembolization,
For those with extrahepatic metastases, mean survival was 7 months.
As may be expected, survival time was longer in those with better performance status.
Median survival time for those with an ECOG status of 0 at the time of their
first chemoembolization was 11 months, as compared to
3 months for those with ECOG status of >0
Survival data (Kaplan-Meier method) of patients with liver metastases of colorectal cancer (n = 463). Curve A: Median survival time from diagnosis of liver metastases was 38 months. Curve B: Median survival time was 14 months from the start of transarterial chemoembolization therapy.
Kaplan-Meier survival curve. Local control results (RECIST criteria) were partial response, 14.7% of patients; stable disease, 48.2%; and progressive disease, 37.1%. Curve A: In patients with partial response, median survival was 18.2 months. Curve B: In patients with stable disease, median survival was 13.5 months. Curve C: In patients with progressive disease, median survival was 13 months.
Kaplan-Meier survival curve. Curve A: Survival data of 243 patients with liver metastases after transarterial chemoembolization with mitomycin C. Median survival was 14 months. Curve B: In 67 patients treated with mitomycin C and irinotecan, median survival was 14 months. Curve C: In 153 patients treated with mitomycin C and gemcitabine, median survival was 13.9 months.