Coercive power and expert power are the two most common forms of power in an information technology work team, as observed in practice. The ability to reprimand or control others by fear or intimidating is referred to as coercive power. It entails the use of threats or punishment to compel compliance or dissuade undesirable conduct. Coercive authority may be a powerful tool for persuading people to do what you want, but it can also breed resentment and opposition. A boss in an IT work team may use coercive authority to force team members to work extra or fulfill unreasonable targets. The capacity to influence people based on knowledge or skill, on the other hand, is referred to as expert power. It entails possessing particular knowledge or talents that others esteem and regard. Expert power may be a powerful tool for gaining trust and influencing people without resorting to coercion. A team member in an IT work team may utilize expert authority to persuade others to embrace a new technology or methodology. Expert power is the most commonly employed form of power in my class team. While working on a collaborative project, for example, a team member with knowledge in a certain area may take the lead in that component of the project, and the rest of the team may defer to their expertise. In my work team, I feel that, depending on the scenario, a combination of coercive and expert authority is deployed. For example, if a team member frequently misses deadlines or fails to fulfill performance goals, the management may resort to coercion to address the problem. When a team member has a specific area of knowledge, they may utilize their expert power to influence others and push progress on a certain project. Provide conmments on above discussion.

1. Coercive power and expert power are the two most common forms of power in an information
technology work team, as observed in practice.
The ability to reprimand or control others by fear or intimidating is referred to as coercive power.
It entails the use of threats or punishment to compel compliance or dissuade undesirable conduct.
Coercive authority may be a powerful tool for persuading people to do what you want, but it can
also breed resentment and opposition. A boss in an IT work team may use coercive authority to
force team members to work extra or fulfill unreasonable targets.
The capacity to influence people based on knowledge or skill, on the other hand, is referred to as
expert power. It entails possessing particular knowledge or talents that others esteem and regard.
Expert power may be a powerful tool for gaining trust and influencing people without resorting
to coercion. A team member in an IT work team may utilize expert authority to persuade others
to embrace a new technology or methodology.
Expert power is the most commonly employed form of power in my class team. While working
on a collaborative project, for example, a team member with knowledge in a certain area may
take the lead in that component of the project, and the rest of the team may defer to their
expertise.
In my work team, I feel that, depending on the scenario, a combination of coercive and expert
authority is deployed. For example, if a team member frequently misses deadlines or fails to
fulfill performance goals, the management may resort to coercion to address the problem. When
a team member has a specific area of knowledge, they may utilize their expert power to influence
others and push progress on a certain project.
Provide conmments on above discussion