Code of Ethics in E-learning


             Kaido Kikkas
Estonian IT College *** Tallinn University


           CEPOL 55/2012
        Tallinn, August 28, 2012
The Mighty Technology
◊ Yesterday's expensive 'rocket science' is
 today's everybody's stuff. Examples:
  ●   Today's mobile phones have more computing
      power than early 'Big Irons'
  ●   Long time (~20 years) ago, some folks actually sold
      news as their main business
  ●   Mass media vs social media
  ●   Today's home studio equipment (whether music,
      photo or film) was a professional's dream once
◊ Bottom line: people can do great things when
 they don't have to face stupid obstacles
E-learning
◊ Before early 80s: contact learning, pre-IT
 distance learning (correspondence, radio, TV)
◊ 80s and early 90s: computer-based learning
 (PC as an interactive video player); CD-ROMs,
 learning software, multimedia
◊ 90s: e-learning 1.0 – e-mail, Web 1.0, scripts
 and applets
◊ Early 00s: e-learning 2.0 – learning
 management systems (WebCT/BB, Moodle)
◊ Today: e-learning 3.0 – Web 2.0, distributed
 and personal learning environments
Opening up
◊ At first, e-learning was a closed process using
 closed tools – proprietary LMS's with well-
 guarded access
◊ Later, the tools opened up (Moodle, Claroline,
 Manhattan, ILIAS etc), but the content was stil
 closed
◊ Nowadays, a rising trend is open (and
 distributed) tools to provide open learning
 experience – examples range from MIT
 OpenCourseWare to Wikiversity to Khan
 Academy. MMOG => MMOOC
“Houston, we have a problem...”
◊ Technology has evolved a lot
◊ Humans are (mostly) still the same



◊ Possibly the most dangerous person to confront
 is a WEB (Well-Equipped Blockhead)

 (has anyone seen Idiocracy?)
A big question
◊ Does the cyberspace exist?
◊ Or: is the online world a new environment – or
 just the extension of the RL (Real Life)?

◊ Maybe both are correct (in a sense)... Real Life
 with a twist?
◊ The cyberspace is
  ●   Like a knife – can be used to cure or to kill
  ●   Like an amplifier – contacts, relations, stupidity...
Ethical issues in e-learning:
              an overview
◊ Why, what, how, how much, when
◊ Who is the teacher?
◊ “On Internet, nobody knows you're a dog”
◊ Someone tries to steal my dreams!
◊ When things go sour
Why, what, how, how much, when
◊ In the cyberspace, misunderstandings and
 controversies get amplified too – KISS
◊ Set the rules but not in stone – and try to make
 people forget about them (to hell with the
 grade, this thing is FUN!)
◊ Divide the workload along the course and use a
 clearly-defined point system instead of exam
◊ When in doubt, rule in favour of students
◊ Build a community
Who is the teacher?
◊ Dictator – dictates everything
◊ Supervisor – the superficial official, does not care
◊ Guru – loves the stuff but is a bit too hippie
◊ Sensei – the older brother/sister who happens to
 have seen and done it before. Recall the classics:

 "Daniel san, karate here (points to forehead). Karate here (points to
 his heart). Karate not here (points to his belt). You understand?"
                         ***
 Daniel: “Yeah. I'm sorry. That was pretty stupid.”
 Miyagi: “Miyagi say that to father when same thing happened.
 Father agree it was stupid. Father was right.”
“On Internet, nobody knows
               you're a dog”
◊ In general, Dogbert was right
◊ Yet
  ●   Can we always speak our mind? Direct vs self-
      censorship
  ●   Does the information 'stay inside'?
  ●   Can truths be different?
  ●   How does the e-learning system used influence
      freedom of expression?
Someone tries to steal my dreams!
◊ Pacta sunt servanda
◊ Yet, the 'best before' of today's 'intellectual
 property' is long gone
◊ When doing e-learning, do you
  ●   sell your materials, or
  ●   sell your brains (know-how, experience, insight)?
◊ Do regulate the legal side – but keep it free
 (Creative Commons licenses are a good way)
When things go sour
◊ E-learning can have a dark side, amplified
 (again!) by the cyberspace
  ●   Destructive personalities (on both sides!)
  ●   Cyber-hooligans
  ●   Spammers
  ●   Criminals
◊ Well-defined policies help (study guide etc)
◊ Technical safeguards (backups, firewalls etc)
◊ An Armageddon scenario (aka WSHTF)?
(a very provisional) Code of Ethics
◊ E-learning is a two-way process with mutual
 influence – community aspects are important
◊ Motivation is of prime importance – and the
 teacher has the key here
◊ Continuous work rather than one-time exams
◊ Often, there can be many truths
◊ Set the legal framework, but do not go crazy
◊ Have a safety valve on the course (when things
 go sour)
Thank you




       The slides will be available at
    http://www.slideshare.net/UncleOwl
under the Creative Commons BY-SA license

Code of Ethics in E-learning

  • 1.
    Code of Ethicsin E-learning Kaido Kikkas Estonian IT College *** Tallinn University CEPOL 55/2012 Tallinn, August 28, 2012
  • 2.
    The Mighty Technology ◊Yesterday's expensive 'rocket science' is today's everybody's stuff. Examples: ● Today's mobile phones have more computing power than early 'Big Irons' ● Long time (~20 years) ago, some folks actually sold news as their main business ● Mass media vs social media ● Today's home studio equipment (whether music, photo or film) was a professional's dream once ◊ Bottom line: people can do great things when they don't have to face stupid obstacles
  • 3.
    E-learning ◊ Before early80s: contact learning, pre-IT distance learning (correspondence, radio, TV) ◊ 80s and early 90s: computer-based learning (PC as an interactive video player); CD-ROMs, learning software, multimedia ◊ 90s: e-learning 1.0 – e-mail, Web 1.0, scripts and applets ◊ Early 00s: e-learning 2.0 – learning management systems (WebCT/BB, Moodle) ◊ Today: e-learning 3.0 – Web 2.0, distributed and personal learning environments
  • 4.
    Opening up ◊ Atfirst, e-learning was a closed process using closed tools – proprietary LMS's with well- guarded access ◊ Later, the tools opened up (Moodle, Claroline, Manhattan, ILIAS etc), but the content was stil closed ◊ Nowadays, a rising trend is open (and distributed) tools to provide open learning experience – examples range from MIT OpenCourseWare to Wikiversity to Khan Academy. MMOG => MMOOC
  • 5.
    “Houston, we havea problem...” ◊ Technology has evolved a lot ◊ Humans are (mostly) still the same ◊ Possibly the most dangerous person to confront is a WEB (Well-Equipped Blockhead) (has anyone seen Idiocracy?)
  • 6.
    A big question ◊Does the cyberspace exist? ◊ Or: is the online world a new environment – or just the extension of the RL (Real Life)? ◊ Maybe both are correct (in a sense)... Real Life with a twist? ◊ The cyberspace is ● Like a knife – can be used to cure or to kill ● Like an amplifier – contacts, relations, stupidity...
  • 7.
    Ethical issues ine-learning: an overview ◊ Why, what, how, how much, when ◊ Who is the teacher? ◊ “On Internet, nobody knows you're a dog” ◊ Someone tries to steal my dreams! ◊ When things go sour
  • 8.
    Why, what, how,how much, when ◊ In the cyberspace, misunderstandings and controversies get amplified too – KISS ◊ Set the rules but not in stone – and try to make people forget about them (to hell with the grade, this thing is FUN!) ◊ Divide the workload along the course and use a clearly-defined point system instead of exam ◊ When in doubt, rule in favour of students ◊ Build a community
  • 9.
    Who is theteacher? ◊ Dictator – dictates everything ◊ Supervisor – the superficial official, does not care ◊ Guru – loves the stuff but is a bit too hippie ◊ Sensei – the older brother/sister who happens to have seen and done it before. Recall the classics: "Daniel san, karate here (points to forehead). Karate here (points to his heart). Karate not here (points to his belt). You understand?" *** Daniel: “Yeah. I'm sorry. That was pretty stupid.” Miyagi: “Miyagi say that to father when same thing happened. Father agree it was stupid. Father was right.”
  • 10.
    “On Internet, nobodyknows you're a dog” ◊ In general, Dogbert was right ◊ Yet ● Can we always speak our mind? Direct vs self- censorship ● Does the information 'stay inside'? ● Can truths be different? ● How does the e-learning system used influence freedom of expression?
  • 11.
    Someone tries tosteal my dreams! ◊ Pacta sunt servanda ◊ Yet, the 'best before' of today's 'intellectual property' is long gone ◊ When doing e-learning, do you ● sell your materials, or ● sell your brains (know-how, experience, insight)? ◊ Do regulate the legal side – but keep it free (Creative Commons licenses are a good way)
  • 12.
    When things gosour ◊ E-learning can have a dark side, amplified (again!) by the cyberspace ● Destructive personalities (on both sides!) ● Cyber-hooligans ● Spammers ● Criminals ◊ Well-defined policies help (study guide etc) ◊ Technical safeguards (backups, firewalls etc) ◊ An Armageddon scenario (aka WSHTF)?
  • 13.
    (a very provisional)Code of Ethics ◊ E-learning is a two-way process with mutual influence – community aspects are important ◊ Motivation is of prime importance – and the teacher has the key here ◊ Continuous work rather than one-time exams ◊ Often, there can be many truths ◊ Set the legal framework, but do not go crazy ◊ Have a safety valve on the course (when things go sour)
  • 14.
    Thank you The slides will be available at http://www.slideshare.net/UncleOwl under the Creative Commons BY-SA license