SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 6
Download to read offline
This content has been downloaded from IOPscience. Please scroll down to see the full text.
Download details:
IP Address: 189.249.155.186
This content was downloaded on 20/02/2015 at 05:10
Please note that terms and conditions apply.
CMOS sensor as charged particles and ionizing radiation detector
View the table of contents for this issue, or go to the journal homepage for more
2015 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 582 012047
(http://iopscience.iop.org/1742-6596/582/1/012047)
Home Search Collections Journals About Contact us My IOPscience
CMOS sensor as charged particles and ionizing radiation
detector
E Cruz-Zaragoza1
and I Piña López2
1
Unidad de Irradiación y Seguridad Radiológica, Instituto de Ciencias Nucleares,
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, A.P. 70-543, 04510 México D.F,
México.
2
Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Circuito
Exterior C.U., 04510 México D.F., México.
E-mail: ecruz@nucleares.unam.mx
Abstract. This paper reports results of CMOS sensor suitable for use as charged particles
and ionizing radiation detector. The CMOS sensor with 640x480 pixels area has been
integrated into an electronic circuit for detection of ionizing radiation and it was exposed to
alpha particle (Am-241, Unat), beta (Sr-90), and gamma photons (Cs-137). Results show
after long period of time (168 h) irradiation the sensor had not loss of functionality and also
the energy of the charge particles and photons were very well obtained.
1. Introduction
Recently, the CMOS active pixel sensors have has been tested for several applications and thus
have increased the demand for improving the performance thereof [1]. This type of sensors has an
APS (Active Pixel Sensor) architecture, which is formed by an integrated circuit with a matrix of
pixels where each pixel itself contains a photodetector [2,3]. At present, the pixel size is less than 2
micrometers which is possible thanks to microelectronics. In addition to imaging applications, new
perspectives in various research areas could be opened by a different type of devices such as CMOS
sensors. As an example, these devices could be used for detection of ionizing radiation with the
possibility of a submicrometer measurement. In this work we have investigated the possibility of
using a CMOS sensor with an area of 640x480 pixels, which previously has been integrated into an
electronic circuit (figure 1) for detection of ionizing radiation and charged particles testing from
radioactive sources, such as: Am-241, Natural Uranium (U-234, U-235 and U-238), Sr-90, and Cs-
137.
1.1 CMOS sensor operation.
The operation of the CMOS sensor is characterized by its APS architecture, which is sensitive to the
incidence of visible or infrared light, this way the polarized inversely occurs a certain circulation of
current when pixel is excite by light generates a current power in each of the pixels, which varies
with the intensity of light received.
In turn is incorporated an amplifier for electrical signal at each photo site where the device must
send the electrical signal produced by each photosite sensor out of it and amplify on the PC.
VII International Congress of Engineering Physics IOP Publishing
Journal of Physics: Conference Series 582 (2015) 012047 doi:10.1088/1742-6596/582/1/012047
Content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 licence. Any further distribution
of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the title of the work, journal citation and DOI.
Published under licence by IOP Publishing Ltd 1
Figure 1. The CMOS sensor integrated in the
electronic circuit and attached to lap top.
1.2 Signal generation for the sensor CMOS.
According to the linear energy transfer (LET) [4], the load generated from several heavy ions is
usually assumed to be proportional. Indeed for in situ particles in the surface area of the sensor,
linear energy transfer remains constant, where the concept has worked well for older devices, and
continues to have a reasonable approach to alpha particles. In this work the system has been
exposed to alpha particles by Am-241 and natural uranium. Considering
F E  
where ΔE is the energy loss of the charged particle due to electronic collisions while across a
distance dx, excluding all secondary electrons with kinetic energies larger than E0 from the count.
For beta radiation, electrons will have an electric current proportional to the decay energy, which is
produced in each of the pixels, provided by the Sr-90 and Cs-137,
eE I 
Finally for gamma radiation, whose photon will impact in the surface of the sensor that is exciting
each pixel sensor according to the photoelectric effect through the Cs-137,
khf E 
In this way, the energy that is incident on each of the pixels is directly proportional to the radiation
from each radiation source.
2. Experimental part
2.1 System Calibration
The radioactive source of Americium-241 was characterized by constant emit alpha radiation,
which has been used for the calibration of various sensors. From a sample of 0.2g and by mass-
energy relation was calibrated system:
29 8 2
241
241
(1.00495275 10 kg)(2.997 10 )
5.63451604
Am
Am
E m s
E MeV



  

VII International Congress of Engineering Physics IOP Publishing
Journal of Physics: Conference Series 582 (2015) 012047 doi:10.1088/1742-6596/582/1/012047
2
Figure 2. Distribution of digitization in the CMOS sensor pixel
represented by a Gaussian.
2.2 Electrical response from CMOS sensor
The response of the sensor in the absence of radiation has been studied, for each of the pixels is
taken the information from them; where the distribution was possible represent a Gaussian as shown
in figure 2.
This means that the sensor could withstand the variation of current produced by different
radioactive sources, which shows that for small variations of electric currents, the critical detection
point will be through 2.7 x 103
photosites found in the pixels of the sensor and to larger variations
will only need 27 to 270 photosites due to digitization of the signal.
3. Results
3.1 Sensor Response to Alpha radiations
The sensor was exposed to ionizing radiation at the Nuclear Sciences Institute (UNAM) of México.
Figure 3 shows the impact of 4
He atoms on the sensor surface, and the total energy of the source
(Am-241) was about 5.0 MeV where the peaks represent the total energy.
For the composition of Natural Uranium, was obtained a maximum energy of 4.0 MeV and
minimum around 2.5 MeV as shown in figure 4. That behavior is due to the composition of the
radioactive source which is composed of 234
U, 235
U, and 238
U. One influence is the types of nuclear
decays occurring in it due to fluctuation of the energy that arrived to CMOS sensor.
3.2 Sensor response to Beta and Gamma radiations.
Sensor response to beta radiation was obtained by a strontium-90 source, as shown in figure 5, this
source had magnitude of about 0.8 MeV of energy.
VII International Congress of Engineering Physics IOP Publishing
Journal of Physics: Conference Series 582 (2015) 012047 doi:10.1088/1742-6596/582/1/012047
3
Figure 3. Alpha radiation detection from Am-
241 on the sensor area.
Figure 4. Natural Uranium radiations on the
sensor area.
Figure 5. Beta radiation energy from Sr-
90 on the sensor area.
Figure 6. Photons from Cs-137 incidents
on the sensor area.
Finally, the Cesium 137 source was used for testing CMOS sensor. Figure 6 shows beta and gamma
radiation energy incidents on the sensor. It is important to mention that the gamma rays do not
affect the functionality of the sensor and the energy recorded was 1.6 MeV.
3.3 Activity frequency.
Frequency of activity (hits per second) of the sources was carried out during 30 s irradiation and in
this period of time the impacts or hits on the sensor were recorded (table 1). This readout was
repeated for five times for each source.
VII International Congress of Engineering Physics IOP Publishing
Journal of Physics: Conference Series 582 (2015) 012047 doi:10.1088/1742-6596/582/1/012047
4
Table 1. Activity frequency.
Sources Hits/s
Am-241 1.295 x 104
U nat 1.244 x 106
Sr-90 5.12 x 109
Cs-137 3.15 x 1011
4. Discussion and conclusion
The CMOS sensor response was appropriated in each variations of energy from the radioactive
sources. The graph in the figures shows the area and positions of the sensor surface where the
impacted particles and gamma rays.The higher peaks show each energy type from radiation source.
The frequency of activity of the sources was very well determined. Due to the composition within
the pixels by the photosites, exposure of the sources was in the absence of external light in order to
avoid the outer photons excite each of the photosites. When the CMOS sensor was tested under
continuous irradiation for a long period of 168 hours (1 week) using the largest energy source (Am-
241), the sensor had not loss of functionality.
Acknowledgments
Authors would like to acknowledge the technical assistance from Benjamin Leal Acevedo (ICN
UNAM) for irradiation sensor.
References
[1] Servoli L et al 2007 Nucl. Instr. Meth. A 581 335
[2] Abe K et al 1997 Nucl. Instr. Meth. A 400 287
[3] Kleinfelder S et al 2003 Proc. SPIE 4784 Hard X-Ray and Gamma-Ray Detectors and
Applications IV (Seatle, WA) p 208 doi:10.1117/12.450826
[4] Attix F A Introduction to Radiological Physics and Radiation Dosimetry (John Wiley & Sons
Inc., New York, 1986)
VII International Congress of Engineering Physics IOP Publishing
Journal of Physics: Conference Series 582 (2015) 012047 doi:10.1088/1742-6596/582/1/012047
5

More Related Content

What's hot

IRJET- MCNPX Simulated Bremsstrahlung X-Ray Spectrum at 5 MeV, 10 MeV and 15 ...
IRJET- MCNPX Simulated Bremsstrahlung X-Ray Spectrum at 5 MeV, 10 MeV and 15 ...IRJET- MCNPX Simulated Bremsstrahlung X-Ray Spectrum at 5 MeV, 10 MeV and 15 ...
IRJET- MCNPX Simulated Bremsstrahlung X-Ray Spectrum at 5 MeV, 10 MeV and 15 ...IRJET Journal
 
An absorption profile centred at 78 megahertz in the sky-averaged spectrum
An absorption profile centred at 78 megahertz in the sky-averaged spectrumAn absorption profile centred at 78 megahertz in the sky-averaged spectrum
An absorption profile centred at 78 megahertz in the sky-averaged spectrumSérgio Sacani
 
Term Paper on Fiber Optic Sensors
Term Paper on Fiber Optic SensorsTerm Paper on Fiber Optic Sensors
Term Paper on Fiber Optic SensorsPankaj Khodifad
 
Radiation detection devices
Radiation detection devicesRadiation detection devices
Radiation detection deviceswaynelowell
 
Basic dosimetric principle and dosimeters
Basic dosimetric principle and dosimetersBasic dosimetric principle and dosimeters
Basic dosimetric principle and dosimetersVinay Desai
 
EPA Con. Poster 2014 redone1
EPA Con. Poster 2014 redone1EPA Con. Poster 2014 redone1
EPA Con. Poster 2014 redone1Joe Wiegand
 
JOHN_RAE_1102333_PROJECTREPORT
JOHN_RAE_1102333_PROJECTREPORTJOHN_RAE_1102333_PROJECTREPORT
JOHN_RAE_1102333_PROJECTREPORTJohn Rae
 
nanno_actuator
nanno_actuatornanno_actuator
nanno_actuatorJin Wang
 
Xps simplified 4 biosurfaces q1 webinar_draft1
Xps simplified 4 biosurfaces q1 webinar_draft1Xps simplified 4 biosurfaces q1 webinar_draft1
Xps simplified 4 biosurfaces q1 webinar_draft1Carl Millholland
 
Mass spectrometry (Analytical Technique)
Mass spectrometry (Analytical Technique)Mass spectrometry (Analytical Technique)
Mass spectrometry (Analytical Technique)VK VIKRAM VARMA
 
Microwave imaging for thermal therapy
Microwave imaging for thermal therapyMicrowave imaging for thermal therapy
Microwave imaging for thermal therapybenzhoutian
 
AFM and STM (Scanning probe microscopy)
AFM and STM (Scanning probe microscopy)AFM and STM (Scanning probe microscopy)
AFM and STM (Scanning probe microscopy)Preeti Choudhary
 

What's hot (20)

IRJET- MCNPX Simulated Bremsstrahlung X-Ray Spectrum at 5 MeV, 10 MeV and 15 ...
IRJET- MCNPX Simulated Bremsstrahlung X-Ray Spectrum at 5 MeV, 10 MeV and 15 ...IRJET- MCNPX Simulated Bremsstrahlung X-Ray Spectrum at 5 MeV, 10 MeV and 15 ...
IRJET- MCNPX Simulated Bremsstrahlung X-Ray Spectrum at 5 MeV, 10 MeV and 15 ...
 
FTIR
FTIRFTIR
FTIR
 
An absorption profile centred at 78 megahertz in the sky-averaged spectrum
An absorption profile centred at 78 megahertz in the sky-averaged spectrumAn absorption profile centred at 78 megahertz in the sky-averaged spectrum
An absorption profile centred at 78 megahertz in the sky-averaged spectrum
 
Term Paper on Fiber Optic Sensors
Term Paper on Fiber Optic SensorsTerm Paper on Fiber Optic Sensors
Term Paper on Fiber Optic Sensors
 
Laser Communications
Laser CommunicationsLaser Communications
Laser Communications
 
Radiation detection devices
Radiation detection devicesRadiation detection devices
Radiation detection devices
 
Niab 2016
Niab 2016Niab 2016
Niab 2016
 
8labgamma
8labgamma8labgamma
8labgamma
 
Basic dosimetric principle and dosimeters
Basic dosimetric principle and dosimetersBasic dosimetric principle and dosimeters
Basic dosimetric principle and dosimeters
 
EPA Con. Poster 2014 redone1
EPA Con. Poster 2014 redone1EPA Con. Poster 2014 redone1
EPA Con. Poster 2014 redone1
 
NMR Spectroscopy
NMR SpectroscopyNMR Spectroscopy
NMR Spectroscopy
 
JOHN_RAE_1102333_PROJECTREPORT
JOHN_RAE_1102333_PROJECTREPORTJOHN_RAE_1102333_PROJECTREPORT
JOHN_RAE_1102333_PROJECTREPORT
 
nanno_actuator
nanno_actuatornanno_actuator
nanno_actuator
 
Nmr instrumentation
Nmr  instrumentationNmr  instrumentation
Nmr instrumentation
 
Xps simplified 4 biosurfaces q1 webinar_draft1
Xps simplified 4 biosurfaces q1 webinar_draft1Xps simplified 4 biosurfaces q1 webinar_draft1
Xps simplified 4 biosurfaces q1 webinar_draft1
 
Mass spectrometry (Analytical Technique)
Mass spectrometry (Analytical Technique)Mass spectrometry (Analytical Technique)
Mass spectrometry (Analytical Technique)
 
Microwave imaging for thermal therapy
Microwave imaging for thermal therapyMicrowave imaging for thermal therapy
Microwave imaging for thermal therapy
 
FTIR vs Dispersive IR
FTIR vs Dispersive IRFTIR vs Dispersive IR
FTIR vs Dispersive IR
 
THPSM16
THPSM16THPSM16
THPSM16
 
AFM and STM (Scanning probe microscopy)
AFM and STM (Scanning probe microscopy)AFM and STM (Scanning probe microscopy)
AFM and STM (Scanning probe microscopy)
 

Similar to CMOS sensor as charged particles and ionizing radiation detector

Diploma Thesis final
Diploma Thesis finalDiploma Thesis final
Diploma Thesis finalRebecca Boll
 
T zak nima2010
T zak nima2010T zak nima2010
T zak nima2010tuanhsm
 
INFRARED SPECTROSCOPY(IR)
INFRARED SPECTROSCOPY(IR)INFRARED SPECTROSCOPY(IR)
INFRARED SPECTROSCOPY(IR)AJAYKUMAR4872
 
Instrumentation of Mass Spectrometry
 Instrumentation of Mass Spectrometry Instrumentation of Mass Spectrometry
Instrumentation of Mass SpectrometrySowmya B U Jain
 
Some possible interpretations from data of the CODALEMA experiment
Some possible interpretations from data of the CODALEMA experimentSome possible interpretations from data of the CODALEMA experiment
Some possible interpretations from data of the CODALEMA experimentAhmed Ammar Rebai PhD
 
NOVEL METHODOLOGY OF THE ULTRA SONIC BEAM IN LINEAR ARRAY TRANSDUCER FOR HIGH...
NOVEL METHODOLOGY OF THE ULTRA SONIC BEAM IN LINEAR ARRAY TRANSDUCER FOR HIGH...NOVEL METHODOLOGY OF THE ULTRA SONIC BEAM IN LINEAR ARRAY TRANSDUCER FOR HIGH...
NOVEL METHODOLOGY OF THE ULTRA SONIC BEAM IN LINEAR ARRAY TRANSDUCER FOR HIGH...Journal For Research
 
Iop particle beams and applications poster
Iop particle beams and applications posterIop particle beams and applications poster
Iop particle beams and applications posterChristopher Hughes
 
Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) Likhith K
Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) Likhith KScanning electron microscopy (SEM) Likhith K
Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) Likhith KLIKHITHK1
 
H0363059067
H0363059067H0363059067
H0363059067theijes
 
B 568 98 thickness by x ray
B 568   98  thickness by x rayB 568   98  thickness by x ray
B 568 98 thickness by x rayLPELABORATORIO
 
Measurement of energy loss of light ions using silicon surface barrier detector
Measurement of energy loss of light ions using silicon surface barrier detectorMeasurement of energy loss of light ions using silicon surface barrier detector
Measurement of energy loss of light ions using silicon surface barrier detectoreSAT Publishing House
 
Optical Absoprtion of Thin Film Semiconductors
Optical Absoprtion of Thin Film SemiconductorsOptical Absoprtion of Thin Film Semiconductors
Optical Absoprtion of Thin Film SemiconductorsEnrico Castro
 
Atomic spectroscopy.pptx
Atomic spectroscopy.pptxAtomic spectroscopy.pptx
Atomic spectroscopy.pptxArpithacp2
 
Nenopartical optical sensors
Nenopartical optical sensorsNenopartical optical sensors
Nenopartical optical sensorsRam Niwas Bajiya
 

Similar to CMOS sensor as charged particles and ionizing radiation detector (20)

ILC_Paper
ILC_PaperILC_Paper
ILC_Paper
 
Diploma Thesis final
Diploma Thesis finalDiploma Thesis final
Diploma Thesis final
 
Microwave advancement
Microwave advancementMicrowave advancement
Microwave advancement
 
T zak nima2010
T zak nima2010T zak nima2010
T zak nima2010
 
INFRARED SPECTROSCOPY(IR)
INFRARED SPECTROSCOPY(IR)INFRARED SPECTROSCOPY(IR)
INFRARED SPECTROSCOPY(IR)
 
Uv spectroscopy
Uv spectroscopyUv spectroscopy
Uv spectroscopy
 
baltimore_final
baltimore_finalbaltimore_final
baltimore_final
 
Instrumentation of Mass Spectrometry
 Instrumentation of Mass Spectrometry Instrumentation of Mass Spectrometry
Instrumentation of Mass Spectrometry
 
Some possible interpretations from data of the CODALEMA experiment
Some possible interpretations from data of the CODALEMA experimentSome possible interpretations from data of the CODALEMA experiment
Some possible interpretations from data of the CODALEMA experiment
 
NOVEL METHODOLOGY OF THE ULTRA SONIC BEAM IN LINEAR ARRAY TRANSDUCER FOR HIGH...
NOVEL METHODOLOGY OF THE ULTRA SONIC BEAM IN LINEAR ARRAY TRANSDUCER FOR HIGH...NOVEL METHODOLOGY OF THE ULTRA SONIC BEAM IN LINEAR ARRAY TRANSDUCER FOR HIGH...
NOVEL METHODOLOGY OF THE ULTRA SONIC BEAM IN LINEAR ARRAY TRANSDUCER FOR HIGH...
 
Iop particle beams and applications poster
Iop particle beams and applications posterIop particle beams and applications poster
Iop particle beams and applications poster
 
Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) Likhith K
Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) Likhith KScanning electron microscopy (SEM) Likhith K
Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) Likhith K
 
H0363059067
H0363059067H0363059067
H0363059067
 
B 568 98 thickness by x ray
B 568   98  thickness by x rayB 568   98  thickness by x ray
B 568 98 thickness by x ray
 
research paper my.PDF
research paper my.PDFresearch paper my.PDF
research paper my.PDF
 
Spectroscopy
SpectroscopySpectroscopy
Spectroscopy
 
Measurement of energy loss of light ions using silicon surface barrier detector
Measurement of energy loss of light ions using silicon surface barrier detectorMeasurement of energy loss of light ions using silicon surface barrier detector
Measurement of energy loss of light ions using silicon surface barrier detector
 
Optical Absoprtion of Thin Film Semiconductors
Optical Absoprtion of Thin Film SemiconductorsOptical Absoprtion of Thin Film Semiconductors
Optical Absoprtion of Thin Film Semiconductors
 
Atomic spectroscopy.pptx
Atomic spectroscopy.pptxAtomic spectroscopy.pptx
Atomic spectroscopy.pptx
 
Nenopartical optical sensors
Nenopartical optical sensorsNenopartical optical sensors
Nenopartical optical sensors
 

Recently uploaded

Stunning ➥8448380779▻ Call Girls In Panchshil Enclave Delhi NCR
Stunning ➥8448380779▻ Call Girls In Panchshil Enclave Delhi NCRStunning ➥8448380779▻ Call Girls In Panchshil Enclave Delhi NCR
Stunning ➥8448380779▻ Call Girls In Panchshil Enclave Delhi NCRDelhi Call girls
 
Presentation Vikram Lander by Vedansh Gupta.pptx
Presentation Vikram Lander by Vedansh Gupta.pptxPresentation Vikram Lander by Vedansh Gupta.pptx
Presentation Vikram Lander by Vedansh Gupta.pptxgindu3009
 
Zoology 4th semester series (krishna).pdf
Zoology 4th semester series (krishna).pdfZoology 4th semester series (krishna).pdf
Zoology 4th semester series (krishna).pdfSumit Kumar yadav
 
Physiochemical properties of nanomaterials and its nanotoxicity.pptx
Physiochemical properties of nanomaterials and its nanotoxicity.pptxPhysiochemical properties of nanomaterials and its nanotoxicity.pptx
Physiochemical properties of nanomaterials and its nanotoxicity.pptxAArockiyaNisha
 
Chemistry 4th semester series (krishna).pdf
Chemistry 4th semester series (krishna).pdfChemistry 4th semester series (krishna).pdf
Chemistry 4th semester series (krishna).pdfSumit Kumar yadav
 
Biopesticide (2).pptx .This slides helps to know the different types of biop...
Biopesticide (2).pptx  .This slides helps to know the different types of biop...Biopesticide (2).pptx  .This slides helps to know the different types of biop...
Biopesticide (2).pptx .This slides helps to know the different types of biop...RohitNehra6
 
GBSN - Microbiology (Unit 1)
GBSN - Microbiology (Unit 1)GBSN - Microbiology (Unit 1)
GBSN - Microbiology (Unit 1)Areesha Ahmad
 
Biological Classification BioHack (3).pdf
Biological Classification BioHack (3).pdfBiological Classification BioHack (3).pdf
Biological Classification BioHack (3).pdfmuntazimhurra
 
Natural Polymer Based Nanomaterials
Natural Polymer Based NanomaterialsNatural Polymer Based Nanomaterials
Natural Polymer Based NanomaterialsAArockiyaNisha
 
Pests of mustard_Identification_Management_Dr.UPR.pdf
Pests of mustard_Identification_Management_Dr.UPR.pdfPests of mustard_Identification_Management_Dr.UPR.pdf
Pests of mustard_Identification_Management_Dr.UPR.pdfPirithiRaju
 
Recombination DNA Technology (Nucleic Acid Hybridization )
Recombination DNA Technology (Nucleic Acid Hybridization )Recombination DNA Technology (Nucleic Acid Hybridization )
Recombination DNA Technology (Nucleic Acid Hybridization )aarthirajkumar25
 
Pests of cotton_Borer_Pests_Binomics_Dr.UPR.pdf
Pests of cotton_Borer_Pests_Binomics_Dr.UPR.pdfPests of cotton_Borer_Pests_Binomics_Dr.UPR.pdf
Pests of cotton_Borer_Pests_Binomics_Dr.UPR.pdfPirithiRaju
 
VIRUSES structure and classification ppt by Dr.Prince C P
VIRUSES structure and classification ppt by Dr.Prince C PVIRUSES structure and classification ppt by Dr.Prince C P
VIRUSES structure and classification ppt by Dr.Prince C PPRINCE C P
 
DIFFERENCE IN BACK CROSS AND TEST CROSS
DIFFERENCE IN  BACK CROSS AND TEST CROSSDIFFERENCE IN  BACK CROSS AND TEST CROSS
DIFFERENCE IN BACK CROSS AND TEST CROSSLeenakshiTyagi
 
CALL ON ➥8923113531 🔝Call Girls Kesar Bagh Lucknow best Night Fun service 🪡
CALL ON ➥8923113531 🔝Call Girls Kesar Bagh Lucknow best Night Fun service  🪡CALL ON ➥8923113531 🔝Call Girls Kesar Bagh Lucknow best Night Fun service  🪡
CALL ON ➥8923113531 🔝Call Girls Kesar Bagh Lucknow best Night Fun service 🪡anilsa9823
 
Hire 💕 9907093804 Hooghly Call Girls Service Call Girls Agency
Hire 💕 9907093804 Hooghly Call Girls Service Call Girls AgencyHire 💕 9907093804 Hooghly Call Girls Service Call Girls Agency
Hire 💕 9907093804 Hooghly Call Girls Service Call Girls AgencySheetal Arora
 
TEST BANK For Radiologic Science for Technologists, 12th Edition by Stewart C...
TEST BANK For Radiologic Science for Technologists, 12th Edition by Stewart C...TEST BANK For Radiologic Science for Technologists, 12th Edition by Stewart C...
TEST BANK For Radiologic Science for Technologists, 12th Edition by Stewart C...ssifa0344
 
Pulmonary drug delivery system M.pharm -2nd sem P'ceutics
Pulmonary drug delivery system M.pharm -2nd sem P'ceuticsPulmonary drug delivery system M.pharm -2nd sem P'ceutics
Pulmonary drug delivery system M.pharm -2nd sem P'ceuticssakshisoni2385
 
Forensic Biology & Its biological significance.pdf
Forensic Biology & Its biological significance.pdfForensic Biology & Its biological significance.pdf
Forensic Biology & Its biological significance.pdfrohankumarsinghrore1
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Stunning ➥8448380779▻ Call Girls In Panchshil Enclave Delhi NCR
Stunning ➥8448380779▻ Call Girls In Panchshil Enclave Delhi NCRStunning ➥8448380779▻ Call Girls In Panchshil Enclave Delhi NCR
Stunning ➥8448380779▻ Call Girls In Panchshil Enclave Delhi NCR
 
Presentation Vikram Lander by Vedansh Gupta.pptx
Presentation Vikram Lander by Vedansh Gupta.pptxPresentation Vikram Lander by Vedansh Gupta.pptx
Presentation Vikram Lander by Vedansh Gupta.pptx
 
Zoology 4th semester series (krishna).pdf
Zoology 4th semester series (krishna).pdfZoology 4th semester series (krishna).pdf
Zoology 4th semester series (krishna).pdf
 
Physiochemical properties of nanomaterials and its nanotoxicity.pptx
Physiochemical properties of nanomaterials and its nanotoxicity.pptxPhysiochemical properties of nanomaterials and its nanotoxicity.pptx
Physiochemical properties of nanomaterials and its nanotoxicity.pptx
 
Chemistry 4th semester series (krishna).pdf
Chemistry 4th semester series (krishna).pdfChemistry 4th semester series (krishna).pdf
Chemistry 4th semester series (krishna).pdf
 
Biopesticide (2).pptx .This slides helps to know the different types of biop...
Biopesticide (2).pptx  .This slides helps to know the different types of biop...Biopesticide (2).pptx  .This slides helps to know the different types of biop...
Biopesticide (2).pptx .This slides helps to know the different types of biop...
 
GBSN - Microbiology (Unit 1)
GBSN - Microbiology (Unit 1)GBSN - Microbiology (Unit 1)
GBSN - Microbiology (Unit 1)
 
Biological Classification BioHack (3).pdf
Biological Classification BioHack (3).pdfBiological Classification BioHack (3).pdf
Biological Classification BioHack (3).pdf
 
Natural Polymer Based Nanomaterials
Natural Polymer Based NanomaterialsNatural Polymer Based Nanomaterials
Natural Polymer Based Nanomaterials
 
Pests of mustard_Identification_Management_Dr.UPR.pdf
Pests of mustard_Identification_Management_Dr.UPR.pdfPests of mustard_Identification_Management_Dr.UPR.pdf
Pests of mustard_Identification_Management_Dr.UPR.pdf
 
Recombination DNA Technology (Nucleic Acid Hybridization )
Recombination DNA Technology (Nucleic Acid Hybridization )Recombination DNA Technology (Nucleic Acid Hybridization )
Recombination DNA Technology (Nucleic Acid Hybridization )
 
The Philosophy of Science
The Philosophy of ScienceThe Philosophy of Science
The Philosophy of Science
 
Pests of cotton_Borer_Pests_Binomics_Dr.UPR.pdf
Pests of cotton_Borer_Pests_Binomics_Dr.UPR.pdfPests of cotton_Borer_Pests_Binomics_Dr.UPR.pdf
Pests of cotton_Borer_Pests_Binomics_Dr.UPR.pdf
 
VIRUSES structure and classification ppt by Dr.Prince C P
VIRUSES structure and classification ppt by Dr.Prince C PVIRUSES structure and classification ppt by Dr.Prince C P
VIRUSES structure and classification ppt by Dr.Prince C P
 
DIFFERENCE IN BACK CROSS AND TEST CROSS
DIFFERENCE IN  BACK CROSS AND TEST CROSSDIFFERENCE IN  BACK CROSS AND TEST CROSS
DIFFERENCE IN BACK CROSS AND TEST CROSS
 
CALL ON ➥8923113531 🔝Call Girls Kesar Bagh Lucknow best Night Fun service 🪡
CALL ON ➥8923113531 🔝Call Girls Kesar Bagh Lucknow best Night Fun service  🪡CALL ON ➥8923113531 🔝Call Girls Kesar Bagh Lucknow best Night Fun service  🪡
CALL ON ➥8923113531 🔝Call Girls Kesar Bagh Lucknow best Night Fun service 🪡
 
Hire 💕 9907093804 Hooghly Call Girls Service Call Girls Agency
Hire 💕 9907093804 Hooghly Call Girls Service Call Girls AgencyHire 💕 9907093804 Hooghly Call Girls Service Call Girls Agency
Hire 💕 9907093804 Hooghly Call Girls Service Call Girls Agency
 
TEST BANK For Radiologic Science for Technologists, 12th Edition by Stewart C...
TEST BANK For Radiologic Science for Technologists, 12th Edition by Stewart C...TEST BANK For Radiologic Science for Technologists, 12th Edition by Stewart C...
TEST BANK For Radiologic Science for Technologists, 12th Edition by Stewart C...
 
Pulmonary drug delivery system M.pharm -2nd sem P'ceutics
Pulmonary drug delivery system M.pharm -2nd sem P'ceuticsPulmonary drug delivery system M.pharm -2nd sem P'ceutics
Pulmonary drug delivery system M.pharm -2nd sem P'ceutics
 
Forensic Biology & Its biological significance.pdf
Forensic Biology & Its biological significance.pdfForensic Biology & Its biological significance.pdf
Forensic Biology & Its biological significance.pdf
 

CMOS sensor as charged particles and ionizing radiation detector

  • 1. This content has been downloaded from IOPscience. Please scroll down to see the full text. Download details: IP Address: 189.249.155.186 This content was downloaded on 20/02/2015 at 05:10 Please note that terms and conditions apply. CMOS sensor as charged particles and ionizing radiation detector View the table of contents for this issue, or go to the journal homepage for more 2015 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 582 012047 (http://iopscience.iop.org/1742-6596/582/1/012047) Home Search Collections Journals About Contact us My IOPscience
  • 2. CMOS sensor as charged particles and ionizing radiation detector E Cruz-Zaragoza1 and I Piña López2 1 Unidad de Irradiación y Seguridad Radiológica, Instituto de Ciencias Nucleares, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, A.P. 70-543, 04510 México D.F, México. 2 Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Circuito Exterior C.U., 04510 México D.F., México. E-mail: ecruz@nucleares.unam.mx Abstract. This paper reports results of CMOS sensor suitable for use as charged particles and ionizing radiation detector. The CMOS sensor with 640x480 pixels area has been integrated into an electronic circuit for detection of ionizing radiation and it was exposed to alpha particle (Am-241, Unat), beta (Sr-90), and gamma photons (Cs-137). Results show after long period of time (168 h) irradiation the sensor had not loss of functionality and also the energy of the charge particles and photons were very well obtained. 1. Introduction Recently, the CMOS active pixel sensors have has been tested for several applications and thus have increased the demand for improving the performance thereof [1]. This type of sensors has an APS (Active Pixel Sensor) architecture, which is formed by an integrated circuit with a matrix of pixels where each pixel itself contains a photodetector [2,3]. At present, the pixel size is less than 2 micrometers which is possible thanks to microelectronics. In addition to imaging applications, new perspectives in various research areas could be opened by a different type of devices such as CMOS sensors. As an example, these devices could be used for detection of ionizing radiation with the possibility of a submicrometer measurement. In this work we have investigated the possibility of using a CMOS sensor with an area of 640x480 pixels, which previously has been integrated into an electronic circuit (figure 1) for detection of ionizing radiation and charged particles testing from radioactive sources, such as: Am-241, Natural Uranium (U-234, U-235 and U-238), Sr-90, and Cs- 137. 1.1 CMOS sensor operation. The operation of the CMOS sensor is characterized by its APS architecture, which is sensitive to the incidence of visible or infrared light, this way the polarized inversely occurs a certain circulation of current when pixel is excite by light generates a current power in each of the pixels, which varies with the intensity of light received. In turn is incorporated an amplifier for electrical signal at each photo site where the device must send the electrical signal produced by each photosite sensor out of it and amplify on the PC. VII International Congress of Engineering Physics IOP Publishing Journal of Physics: Conference Series 582 (2015) 012047 doi:10.1088/1742-6596/582/1/012047 Content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 licence. Any further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the title of the work, journal citation and DOI. Published under licence by IOP Publishing Ltd 1
  • 3. Figure 1. The CMOS sensor integrated in the electronic circuit and attached to lap top. 1.2 Signal generation for the sensor CMOS. According to the linear energy transfer (LET) [4], the load generated from several heavy ions is usually assumed to be proportional. Indeed for in situ particles in the surface area of the sensor, linear energy transfer remains constant, where the concept has worked well for older devices, and continues to have a reasonable approach to alpha particles. In this work the system has been exposed to alpha particles by Am-241 and natural uranium. Considering F E   where ΔE is the energy loss of the charged particle due to electronic collisions while across a distance dx, excluding all secondary electrons with kinetic energies larger than E0 from the count. For beta radiation, electrons will have an electric current proportional to the decay energy, which is produced in each of the pixels, provided by the Sr-90 and Cs-137, eE I  Finally for gamma radiation, whose photon will impact in the surface of the sensor that is exciting each pixel sensor according to the photoelectric effect through the Cs-137, khf E  In this way, the energy that is incident on each of the pixels is directly proportional to the radiation from each radiation source. 2. Experimental part 2.1 System Calibration The radioactive source of Americium-241 was characterized by constant emit alpha radiation, which has been used for the calibration of various sensors. From a sample of 0.2g and by mass- energy relation was calibrated system: 29 8 2 241 241 (1.00495275 10 kg)(2.997 10 ) 5.63451604 Am Am E m s E MeV        VII International Congress of Engineering Physics IOP Publishing Journal of Physics: Conference Series 582 (2015) 012047 doi:10.1088/1742-6596/582/1/012047 2
  • 4. Figure 2. Distribution of digitization in the CMOS sensor pixel represented by a Gaussian. 2.2 Electrical response from CMOS sensor The response of the sensor in the absence of radiation has been studied, for each of the pixels is taken the information from them; where the distribution was possible represent a Gaussian as shown in figure 2. This means that the sensor could withstand the variation of current produced by different radioactive sources, which shows that for small variations of electric currents, the critical detection point will be through 2.7 x 103 photosites found in the pixels of the sensor and to larger variations will only need 27 to 270 photosites due to digitization of the signal. 3. Results 3.1 Sensor Response to Alpha radiations The sensor was exposed to ionizing radiation at the Nuclear Sciences Institute (UNAM) of México. Figure 3 shows the impact of 4 He atoms on the sensor surface, and the total energy of the source (Am-241) was about 5.0 MeV where the peaks represent the total energy. For the composition of Natural Uranium, was obtained a maximum energy of 4.0 MeV and minimum around 2.5 MeV as shown in figure 4. That behavior is due to the composition of the radioactive source which is composed of 234 U, 235 U, and 238 U. One influence is the types of nuclear decays occurring in it due to fluctuation of the energy that arrived to CMOS sensor. 3.2 Sensor response to Beta and Gamma radiations. Sensor response to beta radiation was obtained by a strontium-90 source, as shown in figure 5, this source had magnitude of about 0.8 MeV of energy. VII International Congress of Engineering Physics IOP Publishing Journal of Physics: Conference Series 582 (2015) 012047 doi:10.1088/1742-6596/582/1/012047 3
  • 5. Figure 3. Alpha radiation detection from Am- 241 on the sensor area. Figure 4. Natural Uranium radiations on the sensor area. Figure 5. Beta radiation energy from Sr- 90 on the sensor area. Figure 6. Photons from Cs-137 incidents on the sensor area. Finally, the Cesium 137 source was used for testing CMOS sensor. Figure 6 shows beta and gamma radiation energy incidents on the sensor. It is important to mention that the gamma rays do not affect the functionality of the sensor and the energy recorded was 1.6 MeV. 3.3 Activity frequency. Frequency of activity (hits per second) of the sources was carried out during 30 s irradiation and in this period of time the impacts or hits on the sensor were recorded (table 1). This readout was repeated for five times for each source. VII International Congress of Engineering Physics IOP Publishing Journal of Physics: Conference Series 582 (2015) 012047 doi:10.1088/1742-6596/582/1/012047 4
  • 6. Table 1. Activity frequency. Sources Hits/s Am-241 1.295 x 104 U nat 1.244 x 106 Sr-90 5.12 x 109 Cs-137 3.15 x 1011 4. Discussion and conclusion The CMOS sensor response was appropriated in each variations of energy from the radioactive sources. The graph in the figures shows the area and positions of the sensor surface where the impacted particles and gamma rays.The higher peaks show each energy type from radiation source. The frequency of activity of the sources was very well determined. Due to the composition within the pixels by the photosites, exposure of the sources was in the absence of external light in order to avoid the outer photons excite each of the photosites. When the CMOS sensor was tested under continuous irradiation for a long period of 168 hours (1 week) using the largest energy source (Am- 241), the sensor had not loss of functionality. Acknowledgments Authors would like to acknowledge the technical assistance from Benjamin Leal Acevedo (ICN UNAM) for irradiation sensor. References [1] Servoli L et al 2007 Nucl. Instr. Meth. A 581 335 [2] Abe K et al 1997 Nucl. Instr. Meth. A 400 287 [3] Kleinfelder S et al 2003 Proc. SPIE 4784 Hard X-Ray and Gamma-Ray Detectors and Applications IV (Seatle, WA) p 208 doi:10.1117/12.450826 [4] Attix F A Introduction to Radiological Physics and Radiation Dosimetry (John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York, 1986) VII International Congress of Engineering Physics IOP Publishing Journal of Physics: Conference Series 582 (2015) 012047 doi:10.1088/1742-6596/582/1/012047 5