The document summarizes evaluations from five students who completed an Excel 2013 training course. All students rated every category, including the instructor, courseware, learning effectiveness, and environment, as 9 out of 9. Some students provided additional comments, with all expressing satisfaction with the course and that it would improve their job performance or skills. A few students estimated improvements in areas like productivity, quality, and time to complete tasks from 20-40% over the next year as a result of the training.

1. Class Summary ­ Excel 2013 ­ Part 3 Sep 30, 2015
Run By: Carrie Williams (cwilliamsaz15) MTM Tool: Class Summary
Date Run: Sep 30, 2015 From Saved Query: No
Date: Sep 30, 2015 Instructor(s): Williams Course: Excel 2013 ­ Part
3
Learning Provider: New Horizons ­ Southern
California
Location: New Horizons ­ Tucson ­ (Learning
Partner)
Client: Public Class
Summary
Student Instructor Courseware
Business
Results
Additional
Questions
Learning
Effectiveness Environment
A N O N Y M O U S 4 5 6 5 5 4 3 1 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00
A N O N Y M O U S 4 5 6 5 5 4 3 5 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00
atropos11@hotmail.com 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00
Daryl_Knott@fmi.com 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00
martin_throop@fmi.com 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00
Average 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00
Summary (cont)
Student Average
A N O N Y M O U S 4 5 6 5 5 4 3 1 9.00
A N O N Y M O U S 4 5 6 5 5 4 3 5 9.00
atropos11@hotmail.com 9.00
Daryl_Knott@fmi.com 9.00
martin_throop@fmi.com 9.00
Average 9.00
Instructor
Student
The instructor was
knowledgeable
about the subject.
Participants were
encouraged to
take part in class
discussions. Instructor overall
The instructor''s
presentation skills
were adequate.
The instructor provided
real­world experiences
and examples. Average
A N O N Y M O U S 4 5 6 5 5 4 3 1 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00
A N O N Y M O U S 4 5 6 5 5 4 3 5 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00
atropos11@hotmail.com 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00
Daryl_Knott@fmi.com 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00
martin_throop@fmi.com 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00
Average 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00
Courseware
Student
Clarity of the
training content
Technical depth of
the training
content
The material was
organized
logically.
Effectiveness of
the labs in
reinforcing the
knowledge/skills
learned in the
modules
Relevance of
the labs to real
world job
situations
Time dedicated to
activities such as
discussions,
practices, and labs
(as opposed to
lecture)
A N O N Y M O U S 4 5 6 5 5 4 3 1 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00
A N O N Y M O U S 4 5 6 5 5 4 3 5 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00
atropos11@hotmail.com 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00
Daryl_Knott@fmi.com 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00
martin_throop@fmi.com 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00
Average 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00
Courseware (cont)
Student
Language quality
of the courseware
(grammar,
terminology, style) Average
A N O N Y M O U S 4 5 6 5 5 4 3 1 9.00 9.00
A N O N Y M O U S 4 5 6 5 5 4 3 5 9.00 9.00
atropos11@hotmail.com 9.00 9.00
Daryl_Knott@fmi.com 9.00 9.00
martin_throop@fmi.com 9.00 9.00
Average 9.00 9.00
Business Results
- 1 / 5 -

2.
Student
This training will
improve my job
performance. Average
A N O N Y M O U S 4 5 6 5 5 4 3 1 9.00 9.00
A N O N Y M O U S 4 5 6 5 5 4 3 5 9.00 9.00
atropos11@hotmail.com 9.00 9.00
Daryl_Knott@fmi.com 9.00 9.00
martin_throop@fmi.com 9.00 9.00
Average 9.00 9.00
Additional Questions
Student
How well did this
training meet your
expectations? Average
A N O N Y M O U S 4 5 6 5 5 4 3 1 9.00 9.00
A N O N Y M O U S 4 5 6 5 5 4 3 5 9.00 9.00
atropos11@hotmail.com 9.00 9.00
Daryl_Knott@fmi.com 9.00 9.00
martin_throop@fmi.com 9.00 9.00
Average 9.00 9.00
Learning Effectiveness
Student
I have learned new
knowledge/skills
from this training. Average
A N O N Y M O U S 4 5 6 5 5 4 3 1 9.00 9.00
A N O N Y M O U S 4 5 6 5 5 4 3 5 9.00 9.00
atropos11@hotmail.com 9.00 9.00
Daryl_Knott@fmi.com 9.00 9.00
martin_throop@fmi.com 9.00 9.00
Average 9.00 9.00
Environment
Student
The physical
environment was
conducive to
learning.
The hardware was
setup and
functioning
appropriately. Average
A N O N Y M O U S 4 5 6 5 5 4 3 1 9.00 9.00 9.00
A N O N Y M O U S 4 5 6 5 5 4 3 5 9.00 9.00 9.00
atropos11@hotmail.com 9.00 9.00 9.00
Daryl_Knott@fmi.com 9.00 9.00 9.00
martin_throop@fmi.com 9.00 9.00 9.00
Average 9.00 9.00 9.00
Comments
User Information
First Name
atropos11@hotmail.com Amy
A N O N Y M O U S 4 5 6 5 5 4 3 1 Angela
Daryl_Knott@fmi.com Daryl
A N O N Y M O U S 4 5 6 5 5 4 3 5 Michael
martin_throop@fmi.com martin
Last Name
atropos11@hotmail.com Nixon
A N O N Y M O U S 4 5 6 5 5 4 3 1 Beard
Daryl_Knott@fmi.com Knott
A N O N Y M O U S 4 5 6 5 5 4 3 5 Waite
martin_throop@fmi.com throop
Phone Number
atropos11@hotmail.com 5202758608
A N O N Y M O U S 4 5 6 5 5 4 3 1 (520302­8317
Daryl_Knott@fmi.com 520­308­7151
A N O N Y M O U S 4 5 6 5 5 4 3 5 928 322 3496
martin_throop@fmi.com 9289653829
- 2 / 5 -

3. What was your main objective for completing this training?
atropos11@hotmail.com Prepare for a career change
A N O N Y M O U S 4 5 6 5 5 4 3 1 Prepare for a career change
Daryl_Knott@fmi.com Build new skills and knowledge (not related to a new software deployment)
A N O N Y M O U S 4 5 6 5 5 4 3 5 Build new skills and knowledge (not related to a new software deployment)
martin_throop@fmi.com Better understand Microsoft products before purchasing new software
Overall Satisfaction
Overall, how satisfied are you with this training course? (check only one) [Student Data]
atropos11@hotmail.com Very satisfied
A N O N Y M O U S 4 5 6 5 5 4 3 1 Very satisfied
Daryl_Knott@fmi.com Very satisfied
A N O N Y M O U S 4 5 6 5 5 4 3 5 Very satisfied
martin_throop@fmi.com Very satisfied
Business Results
Based on your response to the prior question, estimate how much of the improvement will be a
direct result of this training.
A N O N Y M O U S 4 5 6 5 5 4 3 1 0%
Daryl_Knott@fmi.com 100%
A N O N Y M O U S 4 5 6 5 5 4 3 5 30%
martin_throop@fmi.com 20%
Estimate how much you expect your job performance related to the course subject matter to
improve in the next 12 months. Include in your estimate any performance improvements due to
this training, as well as all other factors like on­the job experience, incentives, and process
improvements. (For example, if you feel that you can improve your performance by 20% in the
next 12 months based on this training plus all other factors, enter 20% here.)
A N O N Y M O U S 4 5 6 5 5 4 3 1 0%
Daryl_Knott@fmi.com 40%
A N O N Y M O U S 4 5 6 5 5 4 3 5 30%
martin_throop@fmi.com 20%
If you think this training will have a positive impact on your job performance, what areas will be
impacted most? Check all that apply.
Daryl_Knott@fmi.com decreasing costs
Daryl_Knott@fmi.com increasing employee satisfaction
A N O N Y M O U S 4 5 6 5 5 4 3 5 increasing quality
A N O N Y M O U S 4 5 6 5 5 4 3 5 increasing productivity
A N O N Y M O U S 4 5 6 5 5 4 3 5 decreasing time to complete task(s)
martin_throop@fmi.com increasing quality
martin_throop@fmi.com increasing ability to innovate
martin_throop@fmi.com decreasing time to complete task(s)
martin_throop@fmi.com increasing customer satisfaction
Additional Questions
Is this your first time at New Horizons?
atropos11@hotmail.com No
A N O N Y M O U S 4 5 6 5 5 4 3 1 No
Daryl_Knott@fmi.com No
A N O N Y M O U S 4 5 6 5 5 4 3 5 No
martin_throop@fmi.com No
Would you recommend New Horizons to others?
atropos11@hotmail.com Yes
A N O N Y M O U S 4 5 6 5 5 4 3 1 Yes
Daryl_Knott@fmi.com Yes
A N O N Y M O U S 4 5 6 5 5 4 3 5 Yes
martin_throop@fmi.com Yes
- 3 / 5 -

4. ver. 001
Other classes you are interested in taking:
atropos11@hotmail.com photoshop
Would you be willing to provide a public quote about your experience taking this course?
atropos11@hotmail.com Yes
A N O N Y M O U S 4 5 6 5 5 4 3 1 No
Daryl_Knott@fmi.com No
A N O N Y M O U S 4 5 6 5 5 4 3 5 Yes
martin_throop@fmi.com No
Return on Investment
Would you like to be notified about advanced or complementary courses?
A N O N Y M O U S 4 5 6 5 5 4 3 1 Yes
Daryl_Knott@fmi.com Yes
A N O N Y M O U S 4 5 6 5 5 4 3 5 No
martin_throop@fmi.com No
Job Impact
What percent of your total work time requires the knowledge or skills presented in this training?
Please check only one.
A N O N Y M O U S 4 5 6 5 5 4 3 1 0%
Daryl_Knott@fmi.com 30%
A N O N Y M O U S 4 5 6 5 5 4 3 5 40%
martin_throop@fmi.com 50%
Response Rate
Form Type Evaluations
Sent
Evaluations
Received
Response
Rate
Post Event 5 5 100.00%
Report Recommendations
Interpreting the Report
Below are tips to help you understand the information in the report. For additional information, please click the Help tab above the
report.
Summarizes scores from each student for selected question categories and questions; compare and analyze scores for all students
that completed evaluations.
Student comments provide additional insight into the scores displayed within the report.
Determine the students’ overall perceived value derived specifically from training to proactively manage future training events.
Recommended Actions
Below are recommended next steps to take after reviewing the information in this report. Additionally, you'll find links to
automatically run complementary reports for drilling­down further into the data or analyzing the information in another way.
If any learner rated the class much lower than others, and the learner provided an email address, follow up with that person to
gather additional feedback regarding the scores. Share that feedback with instructor and course managers as areas for
improvement.
If any learner rated the class much higher than others, especially in the areas of job impact or business results, follow up with
those learners to gether additional feedback on how they were able to maximize their use of what they learned on the job. Share
this feedback with course managers to ensure they share the knowledge with future learners to maximize job impact and business
results.
Schedule this report to be emailed automatically to the course and instructor managers on a daily basis so they are able to review
performance on a regular basis.
Recommended Links
Run the Learner Comments report to review all the qualitative feedback for specific approaches to make the learning more
effective and impactful.
Run the Quick Question report to summarize the scale­based and multiple­choice answers for all of the evaluations.
Run the Performance to Goals report to view how these results compared to your goals.
Report Criteria
Reporting Date: Sep 30, 2015 to Sep 30, 2015
Scale: 1 Low ­ 9 High
Class: Excel 2013 ­ Part 3 Sep 30, 2015
- 4 / 5 -

5. - 5 / 5 -