- The document summarizes evaluations from students who took a PowerPoint 2013 training course taught by instructor Carrie Williams at New Horizons Southern California on December 16, 2015.
- Students highly rated the instructor, courseware, and learning environment and effectiveness. The average ratings for all categories ranged from 7.6 to 9 out of 10.
- One student commented that the instructor was "very well spoken, calm and very patient. Very knowledgeable." Another said the instructor "is very welcoming, understanding, and happy to assist anyone in need."
The document summarizes evaluations from a PowerPoint 2013 training course. Two students completed the evaluation, anonymously identified as 46048783 and 46048873. Both students gave the highest possible rating of 9 out of 9 to all evaluation categories, including the instructor, courseware, likelihood of improving job performance, learning effectiveness, and environment. The summary indicates that both anonymous students were very satisfied with the training course.
This document summarizes evaluations from students who took an Excel 2013 Part 2 class. It provides averages of student ratings on a scale of 1 to 9 for various aspects of the class including the instructor's knowledge, presentation skills, and encouragement of discussion; clarity and organization of course content; effectiveness and relevance of labs; and whether the training improved job performance. It also includes student comments praising the instructor and a comment criticizing the course for not delivering advanced content as described.
The report summarizes learning performance data from a survey based on questions about an instructor and course. It shows average ratings for the instructor and individual questions compared to the organization's internal benchmarks. Ratings for the instructor met or exceeded the benchmarks on questions about encouraging discussion, providing real-world examples, knowledge, and presentation skills. The report recommends identifying areas below benchmarks and using filters to guide instructor or course improvements.
This report summarizes learning performance data from surveys based on question categories and individual questions. It shows the average scores for an organization compared to its internal benchmarks across several metrics related to instructors. The instructor received high marks above the benchmarks in areas like knowledge, presentation skills, and providing real-world examples. The report recommends identifying categories below benchmarks and using filters to guide performance reviews and course redesigns.
The document summarizes evaluations from students who took a PowerPoint 2013 training course. All students rated every part of the course, including the instructor, courseware, and learning environment, as 9 out of 9. One student commented that the instructor was "extremely passionate" and that it was a "GREAT EXPERIENCE". Overall satisfaction with the course was reported as very satisfied.
The document provides a summary of a training course on Word 2013 - Part 3 held on December 9, 2015. It includes ratings from four students on various aspects of the course such as the instructor, courseware, learning effectiveness, and environment. All aspects rated received an average score of 9 out of 10 or higher. One student commented that the instructor was "most excellent." The summary also notes that all four students who completed the evaluation form said they would recommend New Horizons to others.
This document provides a summary of student evaluations for a Word 2010 training course. It includes ratings for various aspects of the course such as the instructor, courseware, and learning environment. On average, students rated most components between 8 and 9 out of 10. However, one student commented that the instructor needed to have more patience. Another student felt the courseware could include more practice activities.
This document summarizes evaluations from a Word 2013 training course. Three students completed evaluations, rating various aspects of the instructor, courseware, learning effectiveness, and environment on a scale of 1 to 10. Average ratings were high, ranging from 7.67 to 9. Overall, students were very satisfied with the training and felt it would improve their job performance and skills. Comments indicated the instructor was knowledgeable and helpful. The document provides recommendations for following up with any low ratings and improving future trainings.
The document summarizes evaluations from a PowerPoint 2013 training course. Two students completed the evaluation, anonymously identified as 46048783 and 46048873. Both students gave the highest possible rating of 9 out of 9 to all evaluation categories, including the instructor, courseware, likelihood of improving job performance, learning effectiveness, and environment. The summary indicates that both anonymous students were very satisfied with the training course.
This document summarizes evaluations from students who took an Excel 2013 Part 2 class. It provides averages of student ratings on a scale of 1 to 9 for various aspects of the class including the instructor's knowledge, presentation skills, and encouragement of discussion; clarity and organization of course content; effectiveness and relevance of labs; and whether the training improved job performance. It also includes student comments praising the instructor and a comment criticizing the course for not delivering advanced content as described.
The report summarizes learning performance data from a survey based on questions about an instructor and course. It shows average ratings for the instructor and individual questions compared to the organization's internal benchmarks. Ratings for the instructor met or exceeded the benchmarks on questions about encouraging discussion, providing real-world examples, knowledge, and presentation skills. The report recommends identifying areas below benchmarks and using filters to guide instructor or course improvements.
This report summarizes learning performance data from surveys based on question categories and individual questions. It shows the average scores for an organization compared to its internal benchmarks across several metrics related to instructors. The instructor received high marks above the benchmarks in areas like knowledge, presentation skills, and providing real-world examples. The report recommends identifying categories below benchmarks and using filters to guide performance reviews and course redesigns.
The document summarizes evaluations from students who took a PowerPoint 2013 training course. All students rated every part of the course, including the instructor, courseware, and learning environment, as 9 out of 9. One student commented that the instructor was "extremely passionate" and that it was a "GREAT EXPERIENCE". Overall satisfaction with the course was reported as very satisfied.
The document provides a summary of a training course on Word 2013 - Part 3 held on December 9, 2015. It includes ratings from four students on various aspects of the course such as the instructor, courseware, learning effectiveness, and environment. All aspects rated received an average score of 9 out of 10 or higher. One student commented that the instructor was "most excellent." The summary also notes that all four students who completed the evaluation form said they would recommend New Horizons to others.
This document provides a summary of student evaluations for a Word 2010 training course. It includes ratings for various aspects of the course such as the instructor, courseware, and learning environment. On average, students rated most components between 8 and 9 out of 10. However, one student commented that the instructor needed to have more patience. Another student felt the courseware could include more practice activities.
This document summarizes evaluations from a Word 2013 training course. Three students completed evaluations, rating various aspects of the instructor, courseware, learning effectiveness, and environment on a scale of 1 to 10. Average ratings were high, ranging from 7.67 to 9. Overall, students were very satisfied with the training and felt it would improve their job performance and skills. Comments indicated the instructor was knowledgeable and helpful. The document provides recommendations for following up with any low ratings and improving future trainings.
This document summarizes evaluations from a class titled "Outlook 2013 Part 1" taught by instructor Carrie Williams at New Horizons - Southern California. Overall ratings for the instructor, courseware, and learning environment averaged between 8.67-8.89 out of 10. Students felt the instructor was knowledgeable and encouraged participation. The courseware was well organized with effective labs and relevance to real world skills. The environment was conducive to learning.
The document provides a summary of evaluations from a training course on Outlook 2010 - Part 2. Two students completed evaluations, rating various aspects of the instructor, courseware, learning effectiveness, and environment on a scale of 1 to 9. Both students rated all categories between 8 and 9, indicating high satisfaction. Comments provided additional positive feedback, with one student noting a technical issue. The summary recommends following up with students who rated aspects lower or higher to improve future trainings.
The document appears to be a class summary report for a Word 2013 training course. It includes ratings and feedback from 8 students on various aspects of the course such as the instructor's knowledge, the courseware, and the learning environment. Some key points:
- Students generally rated the instructor highly, particularly for knowledge, presentation skills, and providing real-world examples.
- Ratings for courseware were also largely positive, though one student noted some content could have been presented more clearly.
- Feedback was overall positive about the learning environment and physical space being conducive to learning.
1. This document summarizes a class on Word 2013 taught by instructor Carrie Williams at New Horizons Southern California on December 3, 2015.
2. Seven students completed an evaluation providing ratings for the instructor, courseware, business results, learning effectiveness, and environment.
3. On average, students rated the instructor, courseware, and learning effectiveness between 8-9 out of 10, indicating high satisfaction. However, one student commented that the instructor should use proper English for greater professionalism.
This document summarizes evaluations from students who took a Word 2013 training course. It provides average ratings for each student across various categories related to the course, including the instructor, courseware, learning effectiveness, and environment. Ratings were on a scale of 1 to 10, with all students giving average ratings between 8.82 and 9.00 for each category. The summary also includes student comments praising the instructor and information about the students.
This document provides a summary of student evaluations for an Excel 2013 training course. It shows the average ratings students gave for various aspects of the course such as the instructor, courseware, learning effectiveness, and environment. It also includes individual student ratings for each category as well as comments from students and the instructor. The top students in the class all gave ratings of 9 out of 10 for most categories, indicating high satisfaction with various elements of the training.
This document summarizes evaluations from students of a PowerPoint 2013 training course. It provides average ratings across various categories for each student, including instructor quality, courseware, learning effectiveness, and environment. Student comments indicate their objectives for taking the course were to build new skills and most were very satisfied or satisfied with their training experience. Recommendations include following up with any students who provided significantly lower ratings to understand feedback for improvements.
VWO Webinar: How To Plan Your Optimisation RoadmapVWO
If your conversion optimization sprints are dependent on surprise wins, then here’s something you should know —”A surprise win might be buried deep in your A/B testing cycle; you might have to wait for weeks, maybe months to see that.”
The good news is that an experimentation roadmap can open up the possibility of seeing those wins a lot faster. This session will help you uncover ways to manage and prioritize testing ideas in a systematic manner and improve your chances of seeing wins faster with your optimization program.
The document summarizes evaluations from five students who completed an Excel 2013 training course. All students rated every category, including the instructor, courseware, learning effectiveness, and environment, as 9 out of 9. Some students provided additional comments, with all expressing satisfaction with the course and that it would improve their job performance or skills. A few students estimated improvements in areas like productivity, quality, and time to complete tasks from 20-40% over the next year as a result of the training.
This document summarizes feedback from students who took an Excel 2013 training course. It provides averages of student ratings for various aspects of the course such as the instructor's knowledge, the course materials, how well the training met expectations, and whether students learned new skills. Overall ratings averaged between 7-9 out of 10 for most categories. A few students provided lower ratings for some areas.
Accuracy and Precision Test: This test requires candidates to identify, based on a table and various icons, mistakes, errors, typos or other ‘inaccuracies’ in a control line under a heavy time-pressure. There are 40 accuracy and precision questions in a competition, and the allocated time is 6 minutes (AST only).
Training4EU Team - Profile
Training 4EU Team provides web based tests and books on potential candidates who would like to become tomorrow’s permanent EU Officials.
With a mix of theory, exercises, and simulation tests we support you οn EPSO exams.
Training4EU Team consist of a group of professionals with extensive experience on EPSO Competitions that can prepare you in an effective and timely professionally manner.
Engaging in meaningful change in assessmentTansy Jessop
This seminar explores changing assessment practices through examining evidence and models from a decade of research on transforming student experiences through assessment (TESTA). The seminar will help participants evaluate the benefits of making program-level assessment changes, address potential barriers, and identify enabling conditions for changing assessment culture. Attendees will also explore practical assessment ideas and ways to expand their repertoire of programmatic assessment approaches.
Aaron Wolowiec, MSA, CAE, CMP, CTA delivered this presentation during the MSAE Meeting Planning Conference in Mt. Pleasant, MI on Wednesday, April 19, 2017.
tutor2u Strong Foundations A Level Psychologytutor2u
Browse the student workshop booklet for our A Level Psychology Strong Foundations exam-skills and revision workshop. For more information on how to attend the A Level Psychology Strong Foundations workshops, please visit http://www.tutor2u.net/events/a-level-psychology-strong-foundations-workshops
This document summarizes evaluations from students who took an Excel 2010 training course. The one-day course was taught by instructor Carrie Williams at the New Horizons learning center in Tucson, Arizona on September 1, 2015. Student evaluations gave the instructor, courseware, and learning environment high ratings, averaging between 8.5-9 out of 10 for most categories. Two students left comments praising the instructor for being informative and pleasant to work with.
Life Coaching PowerPoint Presentation SlidesSlideTeam
Life Coaching PowerPoint Presentation Slides features a highly visual format that is easy-to-follow. This business life coaching PPT template deck kicks off with an analysis of the current position of the company. You can showcase your findings related to the current year’s workforce turnover. Represent the total and voluntary yearly employee turnover trend or for every four months. Our designers have included ample data visualization tools to aid easy explanation. Your audience can develop a deeper understanding of the subject using this corporate coaching PowerPoint presentation. Our PPT slideshow helps you in putting forth a life coaching need assessment. You can explain the whole training lifecycle with the help of this leadership coaching PowerPoint theme. Elucidate the goals and objectives that form the primary reason for business mentoring. Briefly portray the life coaching process using a linear diagram. So, hit the download icon and begin instant personalizing. https://bit.ly/2KuAap8
This document provides an overview of analyzing for instructional design. It discusses the importance of the analysis phase in creating effective learning modules. The analysis phase involves needs analysis, business goals, and assessment. The document then covers the ADDIE model of instructional design which includes analysis, design, development, implementation, and evaluation. It emphasizes that a systematic process must be followed to achieve desired results.
The document provides guidance on writing a Statement of Purpose (SOP) for graduate school applications. It outlines the typical sections of an SOP and questions to consider in each section, including the applicant's academic background, research experience, work experience, reasons for pursuing the degree, and goals. The document also describes how to construct an "intellectual origin story" to introduce experiences that sparked the applicant's interest in their field of study. It advises generating content in response to prompts about catalysts, academics, practical experience, work, and independent learning. Finally, the document offers tips on connecting experiences to ambitions and explaining why the target university is a good fit.
This document summarizes evaluations from students of an Excel 2013 training course taught by instructor Carrie Williams at New Horizons in Tucson. Overall ratings for the instructor, courseware, learning effectiveness and environment were high, averaging between 8.5-9 out of 10. A few students provided positive feedback on the instructor's teaching skills and encouragement of class participation. The training was taken by 9 students in a physical classroom setting with the goal of most to build new Excel skills and knowledge.
Carrie E. Williams completed an online course called "Understanding Your Customer" from the U.S. Small Business Administration on December 20, 2016. The certificate recognizes her completion of the course aimed at helping small business owners better understand their customers. The course is offered by the SBA Office of Entrepreneurial Development as part of their training resources for small businesses.
Taking Your High Tech Product to Market dsp_certificateCarrie E. Williams
Carrie E. Williams completed an online course called "Taking Your High-Tech Product to Market" through the U.S. Small Business Administration on December 19, 2016. The certificate recognizes her completion of the course to help entrepreneurs learn how to take high-tech products to market. It encourages continued learning as a valuable asset.
This document summarizes evaluations from a class titled "Outlook 2013 Part 1" taught by instructor Carrie Williams at New Horizons - Southern California. Overall ratings for the instructor, courseware, and learning environment averaged between 8.67-8.89 out of 10. Students felt the instructor was knowledgeable and encouraged participation. The courseware was well organized with effective labs and relevance to real world skills. The environment was conducive to learning.
The document provides a summary of evaluations from a training course on Outlook 2010 - Part 2. Two students completed evaluations, rating various aspects of the instructor, courseware, learning effectiveness, and environment on a scale of 1 to 9. Both students rated all categories between 8 and 9, indicating high satisfaction. Comments provided additional positive feedback, with one student noting a technical issue. The summary recommends following up with students who rated aspects lower or higher to improve future trainings.
The document appears to be a class summary report for a Word 2013 training course. It includes ratings and feedback from 8 students on various aspects of the course such as the instructor's knowledge, the courseware, and the learning environment. Some key points:
- Students generally rated the instructor highly, particularly for knowledge, presentation skills, and providing real-world examples.
- Ratings for courseware were also largely positive, though one student noted some content could have been presented more clearly.
- Feedback was overall positive about the learning environment and physical space being conducive to learning.
1. This document summarizes a class on Word 2013 taught by instructor Carrie Williams at New Horizons Southern California on December 3, 2015.
2. Seven students completed an evaluation providing ratings for the instructor, courseware, business results, learning effectiveness, and environment.
3. On average, students rated the instructor, courseware, and learning effectiveness between 8-9 out of 10, indicating high satisfaction. However, one student commented that the instructor should use proper English for greater professionalism.
This document summarizes evaluations from students who took a Word 2013 training course. It provides average ratings for each student across various categories related to the course, including the instructor, courseware, learning effectiveness, and environment. Ratings were on a scale of 1 to 10, with all students giving average ratings between 8.82 and 9.00 for each category. The summary also includes student comments praising the instructor and information about the students.
This document provides a summary of student evaluations for an Excel 2013 training course. It shows the average ratings students gave for various aspects of the course such as the instructor, courseware, learning effectiveness, and environment. It also includes individual student ratings for each category as well as comments from students and the instructor. The top students in the class all gave ratings of 9 out of 10 for most categories, indicating high satisfaction with various elements of the training.
This document summarizes evaluations from students of a PowerPoint 2013 training course. It provides average ratings across various categories for each student, including instructor quality, courseware, learning effectiveness, and environment. Student comments indicate their objectives for taking the course were to build new skills and most were very satisfied or satisfied with their training experience. Recommendations include following up with any students who provided significantly lower ratings to understand feedback for improvements.
VWO Webinar: How To Plan Your Optimisation RoadmapVWO
If your conversion optimization sprints are dependent on surprise wins, then here’s something you should know —”A surprise win might be buried deep in your A/B testing cycle; you might have to wait for weeks, maybe months to see that.”
The good news is that an experimentation roadmap can open up the possibility of seeing those wins a lot faster. This session will help you uncover ways to manage and prioritize testing ideas in a systematic manner and improve your chances of seeing wins faster with your optimization program.
The document summarizes evaluations from five students who completed an Excel 2013 training course. All students rated every category, including the instructor, courseware, learning effectiveness, and environment, as 9 out of 9. Some students provided additional comments, with all expressing satisfaction with the course and that it would improve their job performance or skills. A few students estimated improvements in areas like productivity, quality, and time to complete tasks from 20-40% over the next year as a result of the training.
This document summarizes feedback from students who took an Excel 2013 training course. It provides averages of student ratings for various aspects of the course such as the instructor's knowledge, the course materials, how well the training met expectations, and whether students learned new skills. Overall ratings averaged between 7-9 out of 10 for most categories. A few students provided lower ratings for some areas.
Accuracy and Precision Test: This test requires candidates to identify, based on a table and various icons, mistakes, errors, typos or other ‘inaccuracies’ in a control line under a heavy time-pressure. There are 40 accuracy and precision questions in a competition, and the allocated time is 6 minutes (AST only).
Training4EU Team - Profile
Training 4EU Team provides web based tests and books on potential candidates who would like to become tomorrow’s permanent EU Officials.
With a mix of theory, exercises, and simulation tests we support you οn EPSO exams.
Training4EU Team consist of a group of professionals with extensive experience on EPSO Competitions that can prepare you in an effective and timely professionally manner.
Engaging in meaningful change in assessmentTansy Jessop
This seminar explores changing assessment practices through examining evidence and models from a decade of research on transforming student experiences through assessment (TESTA). The seminar will help participants evaluate the benefits of making program-level assessment changes, address potential barriers, and identify enabling conditions for changing assessment culture. Attendees will also explore practical assessment ideas and ways to expand their repertoire of programmatic assessment approaches.
Aaron Wolowiec, MSA, CAE, CMP, CTA delivered this presentation during the MSAE Meeting Planning Conference in Mt. Pleasant, MI on Wednesday, April 19, 2017.
tutor2u Strong Foundations A Level Psychologytutor2u
Browse the student workshop booklet for our A Level Psychology Strong Foundations exam-skills and revision workshop. For more information on how to attend the A Level Psychology Strong Foundations workshops, please visit http://www.tutor2u.net/events/a-level-psychology-strong-foundations-workshops
This document summarizes evaluations from students who took an Excel 2010 training course. The one-day course was taught by instructor Carrie Williams at the New Horizons learning center in Tucson, Arizona on September 1, 2015. Student evaluations gave the instructor, courseware, and learning environment high ratings, averaging between 8.5-9 out of 10 for most categories. Two students left comments praising the instructor for being informative and pleasant to work with.
Life Coaching PowerPoint Presentation SlidesSlideTeam
Life Coaching PowerPoint Presentation Slides features a highly visual format that is easy-to-follow. This business life coaching PPT template deck kicks off with an analysis of the current position of the company. You can showcase your findings related to the current year’s workforce turnover. Represent the total and voluntary yearly employee turnover trend or for every four months. Our designers have included ample data visualization tools to aid easy explanation. Your audience can develop a deeper understanding of the subject using this corporate coaching PowerPoint presentation. Our PPT slideshow helps you in putting forth a life coaching need assessment. You can explain the whole training lifecycle with the help of this leadership coaching PowerPoint theme. Elucidate the goals and objectives that form the primary reason for business mentoring. Briefly portray the life coaching process using a linear diagram. So, hit the download icon and begin instant personalizing. https://bit.ly/2KuAap8
This document provides an overview of analyzing for instructional design. It discusses the importance of the analysis phase in creating effective learning modules. The analysis phase involves needs analysis, business goals, and assessment. The document then covers the ADDIE model of instructional design which includes analysis, design, development, implementation, and evaluation. It emphasizes that a systematic process must be followed to achieve desired results.
The document provides guidance on writing a Statement of Purpose (SOP) for graduate school applications. It outlines the typical sections of an SOP and questions to consider in each section, including the applicant's academic background, research experience, work experience, reasons for pursuing the degree, and goals. The document also describes how to construct an "intellectual origin story" to introduce experiences that sparked the applicant's interest in their field of study. It advises generating content in response to prompts about catalysts, academics, practical experience, work, and independent learning. Finally, the document offers tips on connecting experiences to ambitions and explaining why the target university is a good fit.
This document summarizes evaluations from students of an Excel 2013 training course taught by instructor Carrie Williams at New Horizons in Tucson. Overall ratings for the instructor, courseware, learning effectiveness and environment were high, averaging between 8.5-9 out of 10. A few students provided positive feedback on the instructor's teaching skills and encouragement of class participation. The training was taken by 9 students in a physical classroom setting with the goal of most to build new Excel skills and knowledge.
Carrie E. Williams completed an online course called "Understanding Your Customer" from the U.S. Small Business Administration on December 20, 2016. The certificate recognizes her completion of the course aimed at helping small business owners better understand their customers. The course is offered by the SBA Office of Entrepreneurial Development as part of their training resources for small businesses.
Taking Your High Tech Product to Market dsp_certificateCarrie E. Williams
Carrie E. Williams completed an online course called "Taking Your High-Tech Product to Market" through the U.S. Small Business Administration on December 19, 2016. The certificate recognizes her completion of the course to help entrepreneurs learn how to take high-tech products to market. It encourages continued learning as a valuable asset.
Carrie E. Williams completed an online course from the U.S. Small Business Administration called "Young Entrepreneurs: An Essential Guide to Starting Your Own Business" on December 19, 2016. The course provided guidance for starting a small business.
Encore Entrepreneurs Introduction to Starting Your Own Business dsp_certificateCarrie E. Williams
Carrie E. Williams completed an online course called "Encore Entrepreneurs, An Introduction to Starting Your Own Business" through the U.S. Small Business Administration on December 19, 2016. The certificate recognizes her completion of the course aimed at providing an introduction to starting a small business.
Carrie E. Williams completed an online course called "How To Win Federal Contracts" through the U.S. Small Business Administration on December 18, 2016. The course taught her how to pursue and win federal contracts. The SBA aims to provide small businesses with resources through online training courses.
Carrie E. Williams completed an online course in strategic planning for small businesses offered by the U.S. Small Business Administration on December 17, 2016. The certificate recognizes her completion of the course, which aimed to provide small business owners with strategic planning resources from the SBA.
The SBA Mentor-Protégé Program connects small businesses with federal contractors to provide training and experience. It allows mentors to receive bonus points on future government contracts and credit subcontracts to protégés towards contracting goals. The program aims to strengthen small businesses by helping them develop the skills needed to compete for federal and commercial contracts.
This document is a digital transcript for Carrie Elizabeth Williams that details her Microsoft Office certifications. It shows that she has passed certification exams in Microsoft Office Access 2013, Excel 2010 and 2013, Outlook 2010 and 2013, PowerPoint 2007, 2010 and 2013, Word 2007, 2010, and 2013 including the Word 2013 Expert exams. The transcript provides the names of the testing centers and dates she passed each of the 14 exams. It also describes Certiport as the provider that tracks and authenticates over 12,000 certification exams administered worldwide.
This document contains Carrie Elizabeth Williams' CompTIA certification information including her certificate code and verification URL. It provides her name, certificate number, date of issuance, and credentials needed to validate her CompTIA certification online.
This document provides a summary of the ranking of New Horizons - Southern California as a learning provider based on evaluations from January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2016. It shows that New Horizons ranked 1795 out of 4457 total learning providers based on 27,703 evaluations, with an average score of 8.72 out of 9. The document also provides recommendations on interpreting the report and recommended next steps for analysis.
This report card summarizes learning performance data from a survey based on questions about an instructor and course. It shows average ratings for the instructor and course compared to the organization's internal benchmarks. Ratings were on a scale of 1 to 9, with 9 being the highest. Across all questions, the average rating was 8.33 compared to the benchmark of 8.13. For questions specific to the instructor, the average rating was 8.33, matching the internal benchmark. The report recommends identifying categories that scored below benchmarks and using additional reports to determine how to improve weak areas.
This report summarizes learning performance data from surveys given after training sessions. It provides average scores for questions about the instructor and instructor performance, comparing the organization's scores to its own internal benchmarks. Scores for the organization were consistently higher than the benchmarks. The report recommends determining which question categories scored below benchmarks, using additional reports to identify potential causes, and scheduling regular report distribution to instructors and course managers for development and improvement purposes.
This report summarizes learning performance data from a survey based on questions about an instructor and course. It shows average ratings for the instructor and individual questions, comparing the organization's performance to its own internal benchmarks. Ratings for the instructor met or exceeded the benchmarks. The report recommends identifying any question categories below benchmarks to determine how to improve, and using filters to evaluate specific instructors or courses for performance reviews or redesign plans. It also suggests scheduling regular distribution of the report to communicate results.
This report card summarizes learning performance data by survey question category and individual questions for a training provided by the organization. It shows the average scores for each category and question compared to an internal benchmark. Scores for the instructor category and overall instructor rating were slightly higher than the benchmark. The report recommends analyzing categories below the benchmark to determine how to improve, and using filters to evaluate specific instructors or courses for performance reviews or redesign plans. It also suggests scheduling regular report distribution and reviewing other related reports for further analysis.
This report card summarizes learning performance data from a survey based on questions about an instructor. It shows the average ratings for the instructor and categories like class discussions and real-world examples, all of which were 8.4 or higher on a 9-point scale. The instructor ratings matched the internal benchmark averages. The report recommends determining which categories, if any, fall below benchmarks and using filters to identify strengths or areas for improvement by individual instructors or courses.
This report card summarizes learning performance data from surveys on various questions about an instructor and course. It shows the average ratings for different questions, categories, and an overall instructor rating, and compares the results to an internal benchmark. The ratings were generally high, averaging around 8.4-8.5 on a 9-point scale, but some questions like real-world examples and instructor presentation skills were slightly below the benchmark. It recommends analyzing questions that scored lower to identify areas for improvement and using the report for instructor reviews and development.
This report summarizes learning performance survey results for an instructor-led training. It shows average scores for questions about the instructor and course content, comparing the organization's results to its internal benchmarks. Scores were generally high, ranging from 8.57 to 8.69 out of 9. The report recommends identifying areas scoring below benchmarks to determine how to improve, and using filters to evaluate specific instructors or courses for performance reviews or redesign plans.
This report summarizes learning performance data from a survey based on questions about an instructor and course. It shows average scores for questions in different categories, comparing the organization's performance to its own internal benchmarks. Scores were generally high, averaging around 8.3 out of 9, but some categories like real-world examples were slightly below the benchmark. It recommends analyzing categories below benchmarks to identify areas for improvement, and using filters to guide instructor or course reviews and development plans.
This report summarizes learning performance data from a survey based on questions about instructors and course material. It shows average ratings for an organization compared to its internal benchmarks across various metrics. Ratings for the organization were above the benchmark averages for instructor knowledge, presentation skills, encouragement of discussion, and use of real-world examples. The report recommends identifying areas below benchmarks and using filters to guide instructor or course improvements.
1. Class Summary
Run By: Carrie Williams (cwilliams@nhsocal.com) MTM Tool: Class Summary
Date Run: Dec 19 2015 From Saved Query: No
Date: Dec 16 2015 Instructor(s): Williams Course: PowerPoint 2013 Part 2
Learning Provider: New Horizons Southern California Location: New Horizons Tucson (Learning Partner) Client: Public Class
Summary
Student Instructor Courseware Business Results Additional Questions
Learning
Effectiveness Environment
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 3 4 8 8 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 4 3 7 4 9.00 8.71 8.00 9.00 8.00 9.00
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 4 4 6 3 9.00 8.57 NaN 5.00 5.00 8.50
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 4 5 8 4 9.00 8.43 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00
MICHELLE.SCHULZ@SCE.COM 9.00 9.00 8.00 8.00 7.00 8.00
Average 9.00 8.74 8.50 8.00 7.60 8.70
Summary (cont)
Student Average
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 3 4 8 8 9.00
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 4 3 7 4 8.76
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 4 4 6 3 8.25
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 4 5 8 4 8.76
MICHELLE.SCHULZ@SCE.COM 8.65
Average 8.69
Instructor
Student
The instructor was
knowledgeable about the
subject.
Participants were
encouraged to take part
in class discussions. Instructor overall
The instructor''s
presentation skills were
adequate.
The instructor provided realworld
experiences and examples. Average
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 3 4 8 8 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 4 3 7 4 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 4 4 6 3 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 4 5 8 4 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00
MICHELLE.SCHULZ@SCE.COM 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00
Average 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00
Courseware
Student
Clarity of the training
content
Technical depth of the
training content
The material was
organized logically.
Effectiveness of the labs
in reinforcing the
knowledge/skills learned
in the modules
Relevance of the
labs to real world
job situations
Time dedicated to activities
such as discussions,
practices, and labs (as
opposed to lecture)
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 3 4 8 8 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 4 3 7 4 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 8.00 8.00
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 4 4 6 3 8.00 7.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 4 5 8 4 9.00 6.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 8.00
MICHELLE.SCHULZ@SCE.COM 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00
Average 8.80 8.00 9.00 9.00 8.80 8.60
Courseware (cont)
- 1 / 6 -
2.
Student
Language quality of the
courseware (grammar,
terminology, style) Average
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 3 4 8 8 9.00 9.00
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 4 3 7 4 9.00 8.71
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 4 4 6 3 9.00 8.57
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 4 5 8 4 9.00 8.43
MICHELLE.SCHULZ@SCE.COM 9.00 9.00
Average 9.00 8.74
Business Results
Student
This training will
improve my job
performance. Average
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 3 4 8 8 9.00 9.00
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 4 3 7 4 8.00 8.00
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 4 4 6 3 NaN
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 4 5 8 4 9.00 9.00
MICHELLE.SCHULZ@SCE.COM 8.00 8.00
Average 8.50 8.50
Additional Questions
Student
How well did this
training meet your
expectations? Average
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 3 4 8 8 9.00 9.00
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 4 3 7 4 9.00 9.00
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 4 4 6 3 5.00 5.00
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 4 5 8 4 9.00 9.00
MICHELLE.SCHULZ@SCE.COM 8.00 8.00
Average 8.00 8.00
Learning Effectiveness
Student
I have learned new
knowledge/skills from
this training. Average
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 3 4 8 8 9.00 9.00
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 4 3 7 4 8.00 8.00
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 4 4 6 3 5.00 5.00
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 4 5 8 4 9.00 9.00
MICHELLE.SCHULZ@SCE.COM 7.00 7.00
Average 7.60 7.60
Environment
Student
The physical
environment was
conducive to learning.
The hardware was setup
and functioning
appropriately. Average
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 3 4 8 8 9.00 9.00 9.00
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 4 3 7 4 9.00 9.00 9.00
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 4 4 6 3 9.00 8.00 8.50
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 4 5 8 4 9.00 9.00 9.00
MICHELLE.SCHULZ@SCE.COM 8.00 8.00 8.00
- 2 / 6 -
3.
Average 8.80 8.60 8.70
Comments
Instructor
Comments: (Instructor)
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 3 4 8 8 She was very well spoken, calm and very patient. Very knowledgeable
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 4 3 7 4 Carrie is very welcoming, understanding, and happy to assist anyone in need. She made the experience great.
User Information
First Name
MICHELLE.SCHULZ@SCE.COM Michelle
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 4 3 7 4 Lindsey
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 4 4 6 3 Angela
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 4 5 8 4 JESSICA
Last Name
MICHELLE.SCHULZ@SCE.COM Schulz
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 4 3 7 4 Belz
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 4 4 6 3 Beard
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 4 5 8 4 YEATES
Phone Number
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 4 3 7 4 3102556846
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 4 4 6 3 (520)3028317
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 4 5 8 4 3372813309
What was your main objective for completing this training?
MICHELLE.SCHULZ@SCE.COM Other
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 3 4 8 8 Prepare for a certification exam
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 4 3 7 4 Build new skills and knowledge (not related to a new software deployment)
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 4 4 6 3 Prepare for a career change
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 4 5 8 4 Build new skills and knowledge (not related to a new software deployment)
Courseware
What suggestions do you have for enhancing the courseware?
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 3 4 8 8 Make it easier for the instructor to show video inserts. Due to embedding wouldn't let you do it.
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 4 3 7 4 More in depth analysis of why one would want to perform a certain function
Overall Satisfaction
Overall, how satisfied are you with this training course? (check only one) [Student Data]
MICHELLE.SCHULZ@SCE.COM Very satisfied
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 3 4 8 8 Very satisfied
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 4 3 7 4 Somewhat satisfied
- 3 / 6 -
4. A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 4 4 6 3 Somewhat satisfied
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 4 5 8 4 Somewhat satisfied
Business Results
Based on your response to the prior question, estimate how much of the improvement will be a direct result of this training.
MICHELLE.SCHULZ@SCE.COM 20%
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 3 4 8 8 100%
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 4 3 7 4 50%
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 4 4 6 3 0%
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 4 5 8 4 10%
Estimate how much you expect your job performance related to the course subject matter to improve in the next 12 months.
Include in your estimate any performance improvements due to this training, as well as all other factors like onthe job
experience, incentives, and process improvements. (For example, if you feel that you can improve your performance by
20% in the next 12 months based on this training plus all other factors, enter 20% here.)
MICHELLE.SCHULZ@SCE.COM 40%
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 3 4 8 8 100%
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 4 3 7 4 50%
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 4 4 6 3 0%
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 4 5 8 4 0%
If you think this training will have a positive impact on your job performance, what areas will be impacted most? Check all
that apply.
MICHELLE.SCHULZ@SCE.COM increasing quality
MICHELLE.SCHULZ@SCE.COM decreasing time to complete task(s)
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 3 4 8 8 increasing quality
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 3 4 8 8 increasing productivity
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 3 4 8 8 increasing ability to innovate
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 3 4 8 8 decreasing time to complete task(s)
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 3 4 8 8 increasing customer satisfaction
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 3 4 8 8 increasing employee satisfaction
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 4 3 7 4 increasing quality
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 4 3 7 4 increasing productivity
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 4 3 7 4 increasing ability to innovate
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 4 4 6 3 increasing ability to innovate
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 4 5 8 4 increasing quality
Additional Questions
Is this your first time at New Horizons?
MICHELLE.SCHULZ@SCE.COM No
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 3 4 8 8 No
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 4 3 7 4 No
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 4 4 6 3 No
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 4 5 8 4 No
- 4 / 6 -
5. Would you recommend New Horizons to others?
MICHELLE.SCHULZ@SCE.COM Yes
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 3 4 8 8 Yes
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 4 3 7 4 Yes
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 4 4 6 3 Yes
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 4 5 8 4 Yes
Comments/Suggestions to improve your experience:
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 4 4 6 3 I'm not feeling very well today, which is not the fault of New Horizons!
Would you be willing to provide a public quote about your experience taking this course?
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 3 4 8 8 No
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 4 3 7 4 Yes
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 4 4 6 3 No
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 4 5 8 4 No
Return on Investment
Would you like to be notified about advanced or complementary courses?
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 3 4 8 8 No
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 4 3 7 4 No
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 4 4 6 3 Yes
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 4 5 8 4 No
Job Impact
What percent of your total work time requires the knowledge or skills presented in this training? Please check only one.
MICHELLE.SCHULZ@SCE.COM 20%
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 3 4 8 8 100%
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 4 3 7 4 50%
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 4 4 6 3 0%
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 4 5 8 4 10%
Environment
Comments (Environment):
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 3 4 8 8 Very well done
General Questions
Other (please specify) [What was your main objective for completing this training?]:
MICHELLE.SCHULZ@SCE.COM Build on current skills
Response Rate
Form Type Evaluations Evaluations Response
- 5 / 6 -
6. ver. 001
Sent Received Rate
Post Event 5 5 100.00%
Report Recommendations
Interpreting the Report
Below are tips to help you understand the information in the report. For additional information, please click the Help tab above the report.
Summarizes scores from each student for selected question categories and questions; compare and analyze scores for all students that completed evaluations.
Student comments provide additional insight into the scores displayed within the report.
Determine the students’ overall perceived value derived specifically from training to proactively manage future training events.
Recommended Actions
Below are recommended next steps to take after reviewing the information in this report. Additionally, you'll find links to automatically run complementary reports for
drillingdown further into the data or analyzing the information in another way.
If any learner rated the class much lower than others, and the learner provided an email address, follow up with that person to gather additional feedback regarding the
scores. Share that feedback with instructor and course managers as areas for improvement.
If any learner rated the class much higher than others, especially in the areas of job impact or business results, follow up with those learners to gether additional feedback
on how they were able to maximize their use of what they learned on the job. Share this feedback with course managers to ensure they share the knowledge with future
learners to maximize job impact and business results.
Schedule this report to be emailed automatically to the course and instructor managers on a daily basis so they are able to review performance on a regular basis.
Recommended Links
Run the Learner Comments report to review all the qualitative feedback for specific approaches to make the learning more effective and impactful.
Run the Quick Question report to summarize the scalebased and multiplechoice answers for all of the evaluations.
Run the Performance to Goals report to view how these results compared to your goals.
Report Criteria
Reporting Date: Dec 1 2015 to Dec 31 2015
Form Type: Follow Up;
Instructor Survey;
Post Event
Category: Additional Questions;
Business Results;
Courseware;
Environment;
General Questions;
Instructor;
Job Impact;
Learning Effectiveness;
Overall Satisfaction;
Return on Investment;
User Information
Scale: 1 Low 9 High
Class: PowerPoint 2013 Part 2 Dec 16, 2015
- 6 / 6 -