This document summarizes insights from leaders of initiatives working to improve community health and reduce disparities. It discusses challenges such as securing sustainable funding, engaging diverse stakeholders, measuring progress, and maintaining a long-term vision for health system transformation. Leaders emphasize the importance of focusing on social determinants of health, ensuring stakeholders are ready for collaboration, and balancing strategic goals with adaptability.
CJA is monitoring the development of the field of catalyst initiatives. Catalysts seek to help local regions transform health and health care in their regions. This is the fourth in the series.
CJA is monitoring the development of the field of catalyst initiatives. Catalysts seek to help local regions transform health and health care in their regions. This is the third in the series.
The document summarizes an organizational assessment of the Brooklyn Linkage to Care Coalition (BLCC). It describes BLCC's mission to reduce HIV/AIDS impact through collaboration. Interviews found members understand the mission as linkage to care, advocacy, and education. Major accomplishments include conferences, research projects, and networking. Challenges include lack of funding and unclear future leadership. Respondents felt BLCC should continue with a focus on linkage, research, advocacy, and community organizing. Options for the structure and priorities going forward were discussed.
Making Integration Work - Jonathan BostockAlexis May
The document discusses findings from a survey of over 300 public sector workers on their views of collaboration across public services. While 50% described personal experiences positively, 35% found it challenging. Success is often measured by outcomes and quality of service, while the biggest threats are disagreements over costs and risk. Respondents felt relationships, communication, and mutual understanding were most important for success. Support such as training, mediation, and sharing best practices could help collaboration efforts.
This document discusses opportunities and challenges for community organizations in engaging with the changing healthcare environment for aging populations. It outlines how community organizations are well-positioned to innovate through person-focused care, mitigate financial risk for healthcare entities, help transition patients through different care settings, and support end-of-life needs. However, key challenges include engaging healthcare partners who have different cultures, financially aligning, sharing data, and translating awareness of opportunities into concrete actions through organizational reinvention. The document provides strategies for community organizations to build partnerships and their business case for engagement.
The document provides resources for planning and sustaining community health partnerships and initiatives. It includes general guidance documents, toolkits, templates, case studies and examples across several categories: sustainability planning, evaluation, data and metrics, funding, communications, engagement, policy and advocacy, and project management. The resources aim to support stakeholders in strengthening partnerships, measuring impact, securing ongoing funding, and sustaining work beyond initial funding timeframes.
Future of high impact philanthropy - updated viewFuture Agenda
Future of Philanthropy – Updated View and Global Discussions
We are very pleased that the Future of High Impact Philanthropy project has already gained excellent momentum globally. This post shares extras insights already added to the programme from the first 3 workshops in Mumbai, Singapore and Kuala Lumpur plus 3 events in the UK
Building on the previous post this is an updated perspective on some of the key issues facing the increasingly interconnected areas of philanthropy and impact investing over the next decade. As well as insights from the initial view authored earlier this year by Prof. Cathy Pharoah of CASS Business School, this includes comments by experts in Singapore, the UK, US and UAE, as well as from the Skoll World Forum held last week in Oxford. Together, the 50-plus views provide a great platform for us to build on in the discussions ahead.
All in all, with another 12 events engaging with over 300 experts from around the world, combined with additional contributions via social media, this major open foresight project is set up to provide a terrific view of how high impact philanthropy will evolve and what will be the likely implications both globally and regionally.
If you would like to attend one of the workshops please let us know. You can also add your thoughts to the mix by commenting via Linked-In and Slideshare and by following us on Twitter @futureagenda and #futureofphilanthropy.
We very much look forward to the forthcoming dialogue.
CJA is monitoring the development of the field of catalyst initiatives. Catalysts seek to help local regions transform health and health care in their regions. This is the fourth in the series.
CJA is monitoring the development of the field of catalyst initiatives. Catalysts seek to help local regions transform health and health care in their regions. This is the third in the series.
The document summarizes an organizational assessment of the Brooklyn Linkage to Care Coalition (BLCC). It describes BLCC's mission to reduce HIV/AIDS impact through collaboration. Interviews found members understand the mission as linkage to care, advocacy, and education. Major accomplishments include conferences, research projects, and networking. Challenges include lack of funding and unclear future leadership. Respondents felt BLCC should continue with a focus on linkage, research, advocacy, and community organizing. Options for the structure and priorities going forward were discussed.
Making Integration Work - Jonathan BostockAlexis May
The document discusses findings from a survey of over 300 public sector workers on their views of collaboration across public services. While 50% described personal experiences positively, 35% found it challenging. Success is often measured by outcomes and quality of service, while the biggest threats are disagreements over costs and risk. Respondents felt relationships, communication, and mutual understanding were most important for success. Support such as training, mediation, and sharing best practices could help collaboration efforts.
This document discusses opportunities and challenges for community organizations in engaging with the changing healthcare environment for aging populations. It outlines how community organizations are well-positioned to innovate through person-focused care, mitigate financial risk for healthcare entities, help transition patients through different care settings, and support end-of-life needs. However, key challenges include engaging healthcare partners who have different cultures, financially aligning, sharing data, and translating awareness of opportunities into concrete actions through organizational reinvention. The document provides strategies for community organizations to build partnerships and their business case for engagement.
The document provides resources for planning and sustaining community health partnerships and initiatives. It includes general guidance documents, toolkits, templates, case studies and examples across several categories: sustainability planning, evaluation, data and metrics, funding, communications, engagement, policy and advocacy, and project management. The resources aim to support stakeholders in strengthening partnerships, measuring impact, securing ongoing funding, and sustaining work beyond initial funding timeframes.
Future of high impact philanthropy - updated viewFuture Agenda
Future of Philanthropy – Updated View and Global Discussions
We are very pleased that the Future of High Impact Philanthropy project has already gained excellent momentum globally. This post shares extras insights already added to the programme from the first 3 workshops in Mumbai, Singapore and Kuala Lumpur plus 3 events in the UK
Building on the previous post this is an updated perspective on some of the key issues facing the increasingly interconnected areas of philanthropy and impact investing over the next decade. As well as insights from the initial view authored earlier this year by Prof. Cathy Pharoah of CASS Business School, this includes comments by experts in Singapore, the UK, US and UAE, as well as from the Skoll World Forum held last week in Oxford. Together, the 50-plus views provide a great platform for us to build on in the discussions ahead.
All in all, with another 12 events engaging with over 300 experts from around the world, combined with additional contributions via social media, this major open foresight project is set up to provide a terrific view of how high impact philanthropy will evolve and what will be the likely implications both globally and regionally.
If you would like to attend one of the workshops please let us know. You can also add your thoughts to the mix by commenting via Linked-In and Slideshare and by following us on Twitter @futureagenda and #futureofphilanthropy.
We very much look forward to the forthcoming dialogue.
The document discusses various Children's Health Access Program (CHAP) efforts around the state of Michigan. It begins with an overview of CHAP's goal to provide coordinated preventative care through medical homes for children on Medicaid. It then provides details on CHAP programs in several counties, including: the original program in Kent County; the adapted model in Wayne County focusing on access; setbacks faced in Kalamazoo and Ingham counties; and developing programs in Macomb and Saginaw counties working to establish medical homes and centralized intake.
Making Integration Work - Sandra Birnie and Will IvattAlexis May
The document discusses integrated health and social care delivery in West Cheshire, England. It notes that an aging population is increasing demands on services while budgets are decreasing. Partners are working to reduce hospital admissions and long-term care placements for over-65s by 25-30% and 15% respectively. The model involves a single point of access, integrated locality teams aligned with GP surgeries, and a shared care record to better coordinate services for improved outcomes and efficiency. Metrics are being developed to measure the model's impact on admissions, readmissions, satisfaction and more.
A Framework for Healthcare and Public Health Collaboration: The Population He...Practical Playbook
The Practical Playbook
National Meeting 2016
www.practicalplaybook.org
Bringing Public Health and Primary Care Together: The Practical Playbook National Meeting was at the Hyatt Regency in Bethesda, MD, May 22 - 24, 2016. The meeting was a milestone event towards advancing robust collaborations that improve population health. Key stakeholders from across sectors – representing professional associations, community organizations, government agencies and academic institutions – and across the country came together at the National Meeting to help catalyze a national movement, accelerate collaborations by fostering skill development, and connect with like-minded individuals and organizations to facilitate the exchange of ideas to drive population health improvement.
The National Meeting was also a significant source of tools and resources to advance collaboration. These tools and resources are available below and include:
Session presentations and materials
Poster session content
Photos from the National Meeting
The conversation started at the National Meeting is continuing in a LinkedIn Group "Working Together for Population Health" and Twitter. Use #PPBMeeting to provide feedback on the National Meeting.
The Practical Playbook was developed by the de Beaumont Foundation, the Duke University School of Medicine Department of Community and Family Medicine, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and the Health Resources & Services Administration (HRSA).
Creating Your Accountability BlueprintClear Impact
This document outlines four steps for public health departments to create an accountability blueprint to align their community health assessment, community health improvement plan, and strategic plan. The first step is to separate accountability for population health outcomes from accountability for agency performance. The second step is to appropriately assign population health indicators and performance measures. The third step is to work sequentially from population accountability to performance accountability. The fourth step is to automate the accountability blueprint using a performance management data system. Creating such an accountability blueprint can help public health departments maximize their impact on population health.
This document discusses community capacity building and adaptive challenges. It defines key terms like community and community capacity. It explains that community capacity building is a collaborative process that strengthens a community's ability to act on its own behalf. The document outlines different types of change, from incremental to transformational. It discusses elements of change like shifting perceptions and the adaptive dilemma of declining resources and increasing demands. The role of government is described as moving from benevolent dictatorship to facilitating community-led development. Big challenges are noted, and a progression of change is presented, moving from exclusion to inclusion and belonging.
The document provides an overview of Texas' efforts over the past year to improve coordination and delivery of mental health services. Key accomplishments include establishing cross-agency workgroups to improve coordination, training over 2000 staff in mental health first aid, initiatives at various state agencies to address their clients' mental health needs, and resources created to help connect Texans with mental health services and support. Upcoming priorities include further strategic planning, policy changes, improved data collection, and enhancing behavioral health services across systems to achieve an integrated, unified approach.
This document discusses workforce challenges and opportunities for integration between health and social care. It provides context on budget deficits and demands on the system. Integration is presented as a potential solution but also complicated by the history of separate health and social care legislation. Examples of integrated initiatives in the West Midlands are summarized, including lessons learned from an older adults workforce integration program and a transformation theme. Challenges of integration include defining the integrated system and workforce, and achieving integrated workforce planning. Opportunities include new roles and competencies as well as multi-professional learning.
This document discusses community engagement for health improvement. It identifies four key roles for community engagement: 1) determining local needs and aspirations, 2) promoting health and reducing inequalities, 3) improving service design and quality of care, and 4) strengthening local accountability. The document reviews different approaches to community engagement in the UK, presents examples of relevant initiatives, and identifies characteristics of successful community engagement projects, including clarity of purpose, leadership, engagement strategies, and evaluation. The goal is to inform the Health Foundation's efforts to strengthen community engagement in health.
Health Datapalooza 2013: Hearing from the Community - Jean NudelmanHealth Data Consortium
Health Datapalooza IV: June 3rd-4th, 2013
Hearing from the Community: Where We Are and Where We Would Like to Be
Moderator:
Edward J. Sondik, former Director, National Center for Health Statistics
Speakers:
Georges Benjamin, Executive Director, American Public Health Association (APHA)
Samuel ‘Woodie’ Kessel, Professor, University of Maryland School of Public Health
Patrick Remington, Associate Dean for Public Health, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health
Jean Nudelman, Director, Community Benefits Programs, Kaiser Permanente
Donald F. Schwarz, Health Commissioner, Deputy Mayor for Health and Opportunity, City of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Afshin Khosravii, Chief Executive Officer, Trilogy Integrated Resources
Richard Martin, Vice President, Heritage Provider Network
This session will focus on advances in the use of health data in developing or implementing new tools that impact local community health. It will explore the data and technology needs of local community health organizations and discuss the challenges they face when attempting to meet these needs. It will also present recommendations from non-data oriented people regarding opportunities in the data and technology fields that could enhance their experience in local community health.
This webinar is about the Medicaid Transformation process currently happening in NC. It will review trends in Medicaid reform on a national level, the history of Medicaid reform in NC, and provide tips to family members and self-advocates about how to effectively engage the system.
This document provides information about an upcoming summit on Managed Long Term Services and Supports (MLTSS) programs to be held on February 23-24, 2016 in Arlington, VA. The summit will discuss strategies for states and managed care organizations to improve MLTSS programs through innovation, quality measurement, and care coordination. It outlines the agenda, including keynote speakers from CMS, and case studies on integrating behavioral health, improving access to home and community-based services, and supporting employment for LTSS members. Sponsorship opportunities are also advertised.
The document discusses the Health and Human Services Value Curve, which describes four progressive levels of value for providing services: regulatory, collaborative, integrative, and generative. It provides examples of how agencies have applied the Value Curve by shifting to higher levels of value through partnerships and more holistic, preventative services. The American Public Human Services Association (APHSA) has also shifted in its approach from regulatory to more collaborative, integrative, and generative levels by developing strategic plans, partnerships, and technical assistance focused on innovation and outcomes over specific programs. The goal is for more agencies to use the Value Curve framework to deliver greater value and stronger communities.
The document describes a collaborative initiative in Waihi, New Zealand to address social needs arising from the planned closure of a gold mine. A group of 15+ social services organizations came together to develop a "community village" hub. While a physical hub was not built, the group worked collaboratively on various projects. They established shared values of equality, consensus-based decision making, and utilizing each organization's strengths. The group facilitated events like a hip hop expo to engage at-risk youth and worked to develop social housing. The collaboration allowed for better information sharing and more holistic service delivery to address community needs.
Michael Hernández - Transforming Communities, Improving LivesMichael Hernández
Bio of a public health professional.
"How may I help?" and "what can I do?" two simple questions that have guided my professional career, as well as my personal growth and development. Whether working for health equity, helping a fellow team member succeed, or seeking to improve myself, they are the principles that guide me daily.
This document for communities and hospitals contains examples of successful partnerships, information about new models of care, and tips for making the case to hospitals for funding and support for population health work.
Community Health Improvement Action Plan for Western CT Final Summary Report...Scott LeRoy
The document summarizes a community forum held to present and obtain feedback on a 2014 community health improvement action plan for Western Connecticut. It provides an agenda, overview of attendees, and summaries of presentations and group discussions on priority health issues including obesity/physical activity, mental health/substance abuse, aging issues, and access to care. Key recommendations included refining strategies, expanding outreach, and better incorporating state health improvement initiatives into local planning. Participants agreed to continue meeting and hold future annual forums to advance the collaborative community health improvement process.
The department of health in taiwan initiated community health developmentMaricris Santos
The document discusses community health development (CHD) in Taiwan and the appropriateness of using participatory action research (PAR) to evaluate CHD. It explores the theoretical concepts of CHD and finds that PAR is a flexible approach that can capture the complex social and health phenomena in the CHD framework. PAR is appropriate for both the methodological framework of CHD evaluation and enhancing the actualization of CHD.
Social auditing involves regularly assessing an organization's social and environmental performance based on indicators agreed upon with stakeholders. It aims to evaluate impact on stakeholders, determine how well the organization lives up to its values, and improve strategic planning and accountability. The process involves defining objectives, identifying stakeholders, collecting and verifying data, analyzing and interpreting results, and disclosing findings publicly. Social audits empower communities and increase transparency and accountability in development programs.
This presentation summarises the discussions, and the actions to be taken forward, from our five workshops (1 on physical activity and 4 on health themes) with the third sector
CJA is monitoring the development of the field of catalyst initiatives. Catalysts seek to help local regions transform health and health care in their regions. This is the first in the series.
Respond to this classmates like in the other posts you have done.docxinfantkimber
Respond to this classmates like in the other posts you have done
Carolina
1
Based on the needs assessment of the Carilion Clinic, they immediately began to work on investments such as new accessible health service buildings in different areas of the region and community. This was done by collaborating with a variety of organizations, such as the United Way of Roanoke Valley. For instance, New Horizons Dental Clinic was created based on the data presented by the community needs assessment demonstrating the great need for accessible dental care. Nancy Agee, President and CEO of Carilion Clinic states in the video that collaborating with many different organizations is critical in order to “look at the whole diversity of our region and strengthen relationships so we’re not replicating efforts, but rather we’re complementing and strengthening our efforts to improve health” (2015). I believe the needs assessment allowed them to specifically pinpoint what their community needed, and this allowed them to truly help the community directly. I would recommend the clinic to continue to utilize surveys and the needs assessment to focus on the community itself. This is because the alternative data sources available on a national and state level is not sufficient. The more Carilion Clinic interacts with the community directly, the more beneficial it will be for communities across the region, as well as themselves.
2
Needs assessment, program planning and evaluation are all integrated. For instance, as the book states “the evaluation of a program begins with its needs assessment. Data collected during a needs assessment can often serve as part of the baseline or “pretest” data needed for impact and outcome evaluations” (
Hodges & Videto, 2011, p.4). In other words, in order to for program planning to be successful, it is critical a needs assessment is done and followed by an evaluation of the needs assessment.
3
MAPP, as stated in the text, begins with the development of partnerships and identifying the participants for the needs assessment (Hodges & Videto, 2011, p.10). MAPP was used by Carilion Clinic though the use of their collaboration with other organizations, non-profits, health agencies, and the government. This strengthened the Carilion clinic’s goal as it provided more resources to accomplish the shared vision of improving the communities’ quality of life and delivery of care. APEXPH was used through its three parts throughout Carilion Clinic’s process. The first part, which as mentioned in the book is the self-assessment, was illustrated in the beginning of the video when Nancy, President and CEO, states the issues and goals at hand. The second part, the community process, is demonstrated with the community health needs assessment committee. This is the part where the program objective is derived from. The third part, concluding the cycle, is seen in the example of the New Horizon’s Dental Clinic, where Carilion’s decision based on the ne ...
The document discusses various Children's Health Access Program (CHAP) efforts around the state of Michigan. It begins with an overview of CHAP's goal to provide coordinated preventative care through medical homes for children on Medicaid. It then provides details on CHAP programs in several counties, including: the original program in Kent County; the adapted model in Wayne County focusing on access; setbacks faced in Kalamazoo and Ingham counties; and developing programs in Macomb and Saginaw counties working to establish medical homes and centralized intake.
Making Integration Work - Sandra Birnie and Will IvattAlexis May
The document discusses integrated health and social care delivery in West Cheshire, England. It notes that an aging population is increasing demands on services while budgets are decreasing. Partners are working to reduce hospital admissions and long-term care placements for over-65s by 25-30% and 15% respectively. The model involves a single point of access, integrated locality teams aligned with GP surgeries, and a shared care record to better coordinate services for improved outcomes and efficiency. Metrics are being developed to measure the model's impact on admissions, readmissions, satisfaction and more.
A Framework for Healthcare and Public Health Collaboration: The Population He...Practical Playbook
The Practical Playbook
National Meeting 2016
www.practicalplaybook.org
Bringing Public Health and Primary Care Together: The Practical Playbook National Meeting was at the Hyatt Regency in Bethesda, MD, May 22 - 24, 2016. The meeting was a milestone event towards advancing robust collaborations that improve population health. Key stakeholders from across sectors – representing professional associations, community organizations, government agencies and academic institutions – and across the country came together at the National Meeting to help catalyze a national movement, accelerate collaborations by fostering skill development, and connect with like-minded individuals and organizations to facilitate the exchange of ideas to drive population health improvement.
The National Meeting was also a significant source of tools and resources to advance collaboration. These tools and resources are available below and include:
Session presentations and materials
Poster session content
Photos from the National Meeting
The conversation started at the National Meeting is continuing in a LinkedIn Group "Working Together for Population Health" and Twitter. Use #PPBMeeting to provide feedback on the National Meeting.
The Practical Playbook was developed by the de Beaumont Foundation, the Duke University School of Medicine Department of Community and Family Medicine, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and the Health Resources & Services Administration (HRSA).
Creating Your Accountability BlueprintClear Impact
This document outlines four steps for public health departments to create an accountability blueprint to align their community health assessment, community health improvement plan, and strategic plan. The first step is to separate accountability for population health outcomes from accountability for agency performance. The second step is to appropriately assign population health indicators and performance measures. The third step is to work sequentially from population accountability to performance accountability. The fourth step is to automate the accountability blueprint using a performance management data system. Creating such an accountability blueprint can help public health departments maximize their impact on population health.
This document discusses community capacity building and adaptive challenges. It defines key terms like community and community capacity. It explains that community capacity building is a collaborative process that strengthens a community's ability to act on its own behalf. The document outlines different types of change, from incremental to transformational. It discusses elements of change like shifting perceptions and the adaptive dilemma of declining resources and increasing demands. The role of government is described as moving from benevolent dictatorship to facilitating community-led development. Big challenges are noted, and a progression of change is presented, moving from exclusion to inclusion and belonging.
The document provides an overview of Texas' efforts over the past year to improve coordination and delivery of mental health services. Key accomplishments include establishing cross-agency workgroups to improve coordination, training over 2000 staff in mental health first aid, initiatives at various state agencies to address their clients' mental health needs, and resources created to help connect Texans with mental health services and support. Upcoming priorities include further strategic planning, policy changes, improved data collection, and enhancing behavioral health services across systems to achieve an integrated, unified approach.
This document discusses workforce challenges and opportunities for integration between health and social care. It provides context on budget deficits and demands on the system. Integration is presented as a potential solution but also complicated by the history of separate health and social care legislation. Examples of integrated initiatives in the West Midlands are summarized, including lessons learned from an older adults workforce integration program and a transformation theme. Challenges of integration include defining the integrated system and workforce, and achieving integrated workforce planning. Opportunities include new roles and competencies as well as multi-professional learning.
This document discusses community engagement for health improvement. It identifies four key roles for community engagement: 1) determining local needs and aspirations, 2) promoting health and reducing inequalities, 3) improving service design and quality of care, and 4) strengthening local accountability. The document reviews different approaches to community engagement in the UK, presents examples of relevant initiatives, and identifies characteristics of successful community engagement projects, including clarity of purpose, leadership, engagement strategies, and evaluation. The goal is to inform the Health Foundation's efforts to strengthen community engagement in health.
Health Datapalooza 2013: Hearing from the Community - Jean NudelmanHealth Data Consortium
Health Datapalooza IV: June 3rd-4th, 2013
Hearing from the Community: Where We Are and Where We Would Like to Be
Moderator:
Edward J. Sondik, former Director, National Center for Health Statistics
Speakers:
Georges Benjamin, Executive Director, American Public Health Association (APHA)
Samuel ‘Woodie’ Kessel, Professor, University of Maryland School of Public Health
Patrick Remington, Associate Dean for Public Health, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health
Jean Nudelman, Director, Community Benefits Programs, Kaiser Permanente
Donald F. Schwarz, Health Commissioner, Deputy Mayor for Health and Opportunity, City of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Afshin Khosravii, Chief Executive Officer, Trilogy Integrated Resources
Richard Martin, Vice President, Heritage Provider Network
This session will focus on advances in the use of health data in developing or implementing new tools that impact local community health. It will explore the data and technology needs of local community health organizations and discuss the challenges they face when attempting to meet these needs. It will also present recommendations from non-data oriented people regarding opportunities in the data and technology fields that could enhance their experience in local community health.
This webinar is about the Medicaid Transformation process currently happening in NC. It will review trends in Medicaid reform on a national level, the history of Medicaid reform in NC, and provide tips to family members and self-advocates about how to effectively engage the system.
This document provides information about an upcoming summit on Managed Long Term Services and Supports (MLTSS) programs to be held on February 23-24, 2016 in Arlington, VA. The summit will discuss strategies for states and managed care organizations to improve MLTSS programs through innovation, quality measurement, and care coordination. It outlines the agenda, including keynote speakers from CMS, and case studies on integrating behavioral health, improving access to home and community-based services, and supporting employment for LTSS members. Sponsorship opportunities are also advertised.
The document discusses the Health and Human Services Value Curve, which describes four progressive levels of value for providing services: regulatory, collaborative, integrative, and generative. It provides examples of how agencies have applied the Value Curve by shifting to higher levels of value through partnerships and more holistic, preventative services. The American Public Human Services Association (APHSA) has also shifted in its approach from regulatory to more collaborative, integrative, and generative levels by developing strategic plans, partnerships, and technical assistance focused on innovation and outcomes over specific programs. The goal is for more agencies to use the Value Curve framework to deliver greater value and stronger communities.
The document describes a collaborative initiative in Waihi, New Zealand to address social needs arising from the planned closure of a gold mine. A group of 15+ social services organizations came together to develop a "community village" hub. While a physical hub was not built, the group worked collaboratively on various projects. They established shared values of equality, consensus-based decision making, and utilizing each organization's strengths. The group facilitated events like a hip hop expo to engage at-risk youth and worked to develop social housing. The collaboration allowed for better information sharing and more holistic service delivery to address community needs.
Michael Hernández - Transforming Communities, Improving LivesMichael Hernández
Bio of a public health professional.
"How may I help?" and "what can I do?" two simple questions that have guided my professional career, as well as my personal growth and development. Whether working for health equity, helping a fellow team member succeed, or seeking to improve myself, they are the principles that guide me daily.
This document for communities and hospitals contains examples of successful partnerships, information about new models of care, and tips for making the case to hospitals for funding and support for population health work.
Community Health Improvement Action Plan for Western CT Final Summary Report...Scott LeRoy
The document summarizes a community forum held to present and obtain feedback on a 2014 community health improvement action plan for Western Connecticut. It provides an agenda, overview of attendees, and summaries of presentations and group discussions on priority health issues including obesity/physical activity, mental health/substance abuse, aging issues, and access to care. Key recommendations included refining strategies, expanding outreach, and better incorporating state health improvement initiatives into local planning. Participants agreed to continue meeting and hold future annual forums to advance the collaborative community health improvement process.
The department of health in taiwan initiated community health developmentMaricris Santos
The document discusses community health development (CHD) in Taiwan and the appropriateness of using participatory action research (PAR) to evaluate CHD. It explores the theoretical concepts of CHD and finds that PAR is a flexible approach that can capture the complex social and health phenomena in the CHD framework. PAR is appropriate for both the methodological framework of CHD evaluation and enhancing the actualization of CHD.
Social auditing involves regularly assessing an organization's social and environmental performance based on indicators agreed upon with stakeholders. It aims to evaluate impact on stakeholders, determine how well the organization lives up to its values, and improve strategic planning and accountability. The process involves defining objectives, identifying stakeholders, collecting and verifying data, analyzing and interpreting results, and disclosing findings publicly. Social audits empower communities and increase transparency and accountability in development programs.
This presentation summarises the discussions, and the actions to be taken forward, from our five workshops (1 on physical activity and 4 on health themes) with the third sector
CJA is monitoring the development of the field of catalyst initiatives. Catalysts seek to help local regions transform health and health care in their regions. This is the first in the series.
Respond to this classmates like in the other posts you have done.docxinfantkimber
Respond to this classmates like in the other posts you have done
Carolina
1
Based on the needs assessment of the Carilion Clinic, they immediately began to work on investments such as new accessible health service buildings in different areas of the region and community. This was done by collaborating with a variety of organizations, such as the United Way of Roanoke Valley. For instance, New Horizons Dental Clinic was created based on the data presented by the community needs assessment demonstrating the great need for accessible dental care. Nancy Agee, President and CEO of Carilion Clinic states in the video that collaborating with many different organizations is critical in order to “look at the whole diversity of our region and strengthen relationships so we’re not replicating efforts, but rather we’re complementing and strengthening our efforts to improve health” (2015). I believe the needs assessment allowed them to specifically pinpoint what their community needed, and this allowed them to truly help the community directly. I would recommend the clinic to continue to utilize surveys and the needs assessment to focus on the community itself. This is because the alternative data sources available on a national and state level is not sufficient. The more Carilion Clinic interacts with the community directly, the more beneficial it will be for communities across the region, as well as themselves.
2
Needs assessment, program planning and evaluation are all integrated. For instance, as the book states “the evaluation of a program begins with its needs assessment. Data collected during a needs assessment can often serve as part of the baseline or “pretest” data needed for impact and outcome evaluations” (
Hodges & Videto, 2011, p.4). In other words, in order to for program planning to be successful, it is critical a needs assessment is done and followed by an evaluation of the needs assessment.
3
MAPP, as stated in the text, begins with the development of partnerships and identifying the participants for the needs assessment (Hodges & Videto, 2011, p.10). MAPP was used by Carilion Clinic though the use of their collaboration with other organizations, non-profits, health agencies, and the government. This strengthened the Carilion clinic’s goal as it provided more resources to accomplish the shared vision of improving the communities’ quality of life and delivery of care. APEXPH was used through its three parts throughout Carilion Clinic’s process. The first part, which as mentioned in the book is the self-assessment, was illustrated in the beginning of the video when Nancy, President and CEO, states the issues and goals at hand. The second part, the community process, is demonstrated with the community health needs assessment committee. This is the part where the program objective is derived from. The third part, concluding the cycle, is seen in the example of the New Horizon’s Dental Clinic, where Carilion’s decision based on the ne ...
TO: Health Equity Advisory and Leadership (HEAL) Council
FROM: Commissioner Jan Malcolm
RE: The Future of Health Equity Work at MDH
SUBJECT: The three areas that HEAL has prioritized are also critical areas of focus for the agency.
Collaborating for Health Equity in Chicago: Health Care and Public Partnering...Practical Playbook
The document discusses collaborating for health equity in Chicago through community partnerships. It describes how over 20 hospitals, 7 local health departments, and nearly 100 community partners have come together in a collaborative focused on addressing social determinants of health like food access, violence prevention, housing, and workforce development. The collaborative aims to engage communities, advance policy changes, and measure outcomes through partnership. Examples of initiatives discussed include a West Side collaborative to improve neighborhood health through cross-sector strategies and a health and housing partnership in Chicago.
2016 association for community health improvement conference: summary of proc...Innovations2Solutions
The Association for Community Health Improvement (ACHI) held its annual national conference from March 1-3, 2016. The ACHI
is the premier national association for community health, community bene t and healthy communities’ professionals. This year’s conference was held in Baltimore, Maryland, and centered on discussion around the “From Health Care to Healthy Communities” idea.
The event brought together hundreds of community thought leaders, population health experts and community organizations, in sessions of collaborative engagement and learning. Presentations and interactive meetings introduced and critically discussed the latest tools and approaches to population and community health. This summary provides an overview of some of the key themes and takeaways that emerged from the conference.
Using Stakeholder Feedback to Set Strategy and Manage RiskTracy Houston
This document discusses how gathering feedback from stakeholders can help hospitals develop strategic advantage and manage risk. It recommends that hospitals regularly seek stakeholder perspectives through surveys and interviews to understand how the organization is perceived and what issues stakeholders see as opportunities or challenges. By mapping this feedback against organizational strategies and values, hospitals can identify emerging priorities, anticipate changes, and develop strategic responses. This process provides strategic intelligence that helps minimize risks from unmet stakeholder needs or conflicts between organizational and stakeholder values. The document provides questions to guide boards in comparing stakeholder feedback to strategies, prioritizing issues, and determining appropriate strategic responses.
Build Community/Public Health Partner Call Summary Courtney Bartlett
Lessons and tips from the peer group call on November 3, 2016, with communities/public health departments on how to work effectively with hospitals to address social determinants of health in their communities.
Reimbursement to Value in Telehealth - Karen JohnsonKC Digital Drive
New Opportunities in Collaboration
Comprehensive Primary Care Plus
KC Health Collaborative
13 April 2017
KC Digital Drive Health Innovation Team
Venue: Kauffman Foundation
2 health systems advancing population health via collaborationGrant Thornton LLP
1. The document discusses population health collaborations between health systems, public health organizations, and other sectors. It describes a panel discussion featuring leaders from two health systems and an expert on successful partnerships.
2. The expert identified key characteristics of effective partnerships, including focusing on clear community health needs, generating sustainable funding, and establishing metrics to measure progress.
3. One successful collaboration is Healthy Cabarrus in North Carolina, anchored by a health system. It assesses community needs, partners with various organizations, and has tackled issues like infant mortality and transportation.
4. Another health system leverages data to identify needs and measure results of its efforts. The panelists emphasized the importance of collaboration between organizations to
The article discusses a proposal for developing a national leadership training program and certification process for peer support specialists, recovery coaches, and community health workers. It aims to better integrate these roles and create career advancement opportunities. Key points include establishing a collaborative partnership between universities and organizations, analyzing current certification programs, and developing uniform standards for knowledge, licensing, and accreditation. This would help establish these peer provider roles within the healthcare system and workforce. The proposal outlines initial action steps and the potential benefits of integrating the strengths of each peer provider role to improve health outcomes.
This document provides an overview of a research project conducted by a civil society consortium to examine the interactions between global health initiatives (GHIs) and national health systems. The consortium conducted research in Kenya, Malawi, Uganda, and Zambia through interviews and focus groups. The research aimed to understand the roles of civil society in maximizing positive synergies between GHIs and health systems. The consortium found that civil society plays an important role across various components of health systems, but often lacks capacity. Strengthening community systems is key to empowering civil society to advocate for community needs and provide oversight of GHIs and health services.
Health Equity Workshop - Promising PracticesASI_HSC
This document summarizes strategies and evidence for advancing health equity. It discusses 10 promising practices including intersectoral action, targeting universal policies, purposeful reporting, social marketing, and community engagement. For each practice, the document provides examples from public health organizations and literature reviews on the impact and how to effectively implement the strategies. It emphasizes assessing health inequities, modifying interventions to reduce inequities, and partnering with other organizations to improve health outcomes for marginalized groups.
This document discusses engagement strategies for users and employees. It defines engagement as "a process through which people can interact with an organisation in a meaningful way for mutual benefit." Engagement is most effective when it is a systematic process that is meaningful to participants and leads to positive outcomes. The document examines case studies of engagement strategies at Barclays bank and the Suma co-operative. It also discusses metrics for measuring user and employee engagement. Overall, the key lessons are that engaging users and staff are mutually reinforcing, and that consistent engagement can improve organizational culture and service outcomes.
This document introduces the asset approach for improving community health and reducing health inequalities. The asset approach focuses on communities' strengths rather than deficits, viewing communities as having skills, knowledge, and social connections that can be mobilized. It emphasizes empowering communities and residents as co-producers of health rather than just recipients of services. The asset approach values what works well in communities and builds individual and community resilience. It can be used to refocus existing programs and requires practitioners to share power with communities. Specific local solutions may not be transferable, but the approach's principles of community empowerment can be replicated.
PowerPoint presentation created for executive management of a leading Denver senior services agency to present to a national convention of the National Council of Aging focusing on development of strategic growth plans.
Cook County Department of Public Health 2016 WePLAN 2020 Forces of Change Ass...Jim Bloyd
The Forces of Change Assessment identified several factors affecting public health in Cook County, Illinois, based on focus groups with knowledgeable individuals. The Affordable Care Act was seen as both an opportunity and threat by increasing access but also having limitations. State budget cuts limited resources. Climate change and marriage equality presented threats and opportunities. Incarceration and lack of economic opportunity disproportionately affected minorities and women. Large corporations were seen as prioritizing profits over communities. Focus group members felt average citizens had less power than wealthy individuals and corporations to influence policies impacting health.
Collective Impact - Chris Aycock March 2016Chris Aycock
This document discusses collective impact, which involves multiple organizations working together towards common social goals. It provides examples from the Randolph County Wellness Collective Initiative in North Carolina. The initiative addresses challenges like decreasing obesity rates. Collective impact can change communities by addressing root causes of problems rather than surface issues. It also prevents isolated impact by bringing groups together under a shared vision. Challenges to collective impact include engaging busy volunteers and tracking long-term progress. Strategies to overcome these challenges include training multiple leaders, hiring staff, creating small wins to track progress, and keeping the shared vision at the forefront.
NVBDCP.pptx Nation vector borne disease control programSapna Thakur
NVBDCP was launched in 2003-2004 . Vector-Borne Disease: Disease that results from an infection transmitted to humans and other animals by blood-feeding arthropods, such as mosquitoes, ticks, and fleas. Examples of vector-borne diseases include Dengue fever, West Nile Virus, Lyme disease, and malaria.
Promoting Wellbeing - Applied Social Psychology - Psychology SuperNotesPsychoTech Services
A proprietary approach developed by bringing together the best of learning theories from Psychology, design principles from the world of visualization, and pedagogical methods from over a decade of training experience, that enables you to: Learn better, faster!
Histololgy of Female Reproductive System.pptxAyeshaZaid1
Dive into an in-depth exploration of the histological structure of female reproductive system with this comprehensive lecture. Presented by Dr. Ayesha Irfan, Assistant Professor of Anatomy, this presentation covers the Gross anatomy and functional histology of the female reproductive organs. Ideal for students, educators, and anyone interested in medical science, this lecture provides clear explanations, detailed diagrams, and valuable insights into female reproductive system. Enhance your knowledge and understanding of this essential aspect of human biology.
Does Over-Masturbation Contribute to Chronic Prostatitis.pptxwalterHu5
In some case, your chronic prostatitis may be related to over-masturbation. Generally, natural medicine Diuretic and Anti-inflammatory Pill can help mee get a cure.
Local Advanced Lung Cancer: Artificial Intelligence, Synergetics, Complex Sys...Oleg Kshivets
Overall life span (LS) was 1671.7±1721.6 days and cumulative 5YS reached 62.4%, 10 years – 50.4%, 20 years – 44.6%. 94 LCP lived more than 5 years without cancer (LS=2958.6±1723.6 days), 22 – more than 10 years (LS=5571±1841.8 days). 67 LCP died because of LC (LS=471.9±344 days). AT significantly improved 5YS (68% vs. 53.7%) (P=0.028 by log-rank test). Cox modeling displayed that 5YS of LCP significantly depended on: N0-N12, T3-4, blood cell circuit, cell ratio factors (ratio between cancer cells-CC and blood cells subpopulations), LC cell dynamics, recalcification time, heparin tolerance, prothrombin index, protein, AT, procedure type (P=0.000-0.031). Neural networks, genetic algorithm selection and bootstrap simulation revealed relationships between 5YS and N0-12 (rank=1), thrombocytes/CC (rank=2), segmented neutrophils/CC (3), eosinophils/CC (4), erythrocytes/CC (5), healthy cells/CC (6), lymphocytes/CC (7), stick neutrophils/CC (8), leucocytes/CC (9), monocytes/CC (10). Correct prediction of 5YS was 100% by neural networks computing (error=0.000; area under ROC curve=1.0).
Muktapishti is a traditional Ayurvedic preparation made from Shoditha Mukta (Purified Pearl), is believed to help regulate thyroid function and reduce symptoms of hyperthyroidism due to its cooling and balancing properties. Clinical evidence on its efficacy remains limited, necessitating further research to validate its therapeutic benefits.
Rasamanikya is a excellent preparation in the field of Rasashastra, it is used in various Kushtha Roga, Shwasa, Vicharchika, Bhagandara, Vatarakta, and Phiranga Roga. In this article Preparation& Comparative analytical profile for both Formulationon i.e Rasamanikya prepared by Kushmanda swarasa & Churnodhaka Shodita Haratala. The study aims to provide insights into the comparative efficacy and analytical aspects of these formulations for enhanced therapeutic outcomes.
Here is the updated list of Top Best Ayurvedic medicine for Gas and Indigestion and those are Gas-O-Go Syp for Dyspepsia | Lavizyme Syrup for Acidity | Yumzyme Hepatoprotective Capsules etc
Cell Therapy Expansion and Challenges in Autoimmune DiseaseHealth Advances
There is increasing confidence that cell therapies will soon play a role in the treatment of autoimmune disorders, but the extent of this impact remains to be seen. Early readouts on autologous CAR-Ts in lupus are encouraging, but manufacturing and cost limitations are likely to restrict access to highly refractory patients. Allogeneic CAR-Ts have the potential to broaden access to earlier lines of treatment due to their inherent cost benefits, however they will need to demonstrate comparable or improved efficacy to established modalities.
In addition to infrastructure and capacity constraints, CAR-Ts face a very different risk-benefit dynamic in autoimmune compared to oncology, highlighting the need for tolerable therapies with low adverse event risk. CAR-NK and Treg-based therapies are also being developed in certain autoimmune disorders and may demonstrate favorable safety profiles. Several novel non-cell therapies such as bispecific antibodies, nanobodies, and RNAi drugs, may also offer future alternative competitive solutions with variable value propositions.
Widespread adoption of cell therapies will not only require strong efficacy and safety data, but also adapted pricing and access strategies. At oncology-based price points, CAR-Ts are unlikely to achieve broad market access in autoimmune disorders, with eligible patient populations that are potentially orders of magnitude greater than the number of currently addressable cancer patients. Developers have made strides towards reducing cell therapy COGS while improving manufacturing efficiency, but payors will inevitably restrict access until more sustainable pricing is achieved.
Despite these headwinds, industry leaders and investors remain confident that cell therapies are poised to address significant unmet need in patients suffering from autoimmune disorders. However, the extent of this impact on the treatment landscape remains to be seen, as the industry rapidly approaches an inflection point.
Recomendações da OMS sobre cuidados maternos e neonatais para uma experiência pós-natal positiva.
Em consonância com os ODS – Objetivos do Desenvolvimento Sustentável e a Estratégia Global para a Saúde das Mulheres, Crianças e Adolescentes, e aplicando uma abordagem baseada nos direitos humanos, os esforços de cuidados pós-natais devem expandir-se para além da cobertura e da simples sobrevivência, de modo a incluir cuidados de qualidade.
Estas diretrizes visam melhorar a qualidade dos cuidados pós-natais essenciais e de rotina prestados às mulheres e aos recém-nascidos, com o objetivo final de melhorar a saúde e o bem-estar materno e neonatal.
Uma “experiência pós-natal positiva” é um resultado importante para todas as mulheres que dão à luz e para os seus recém-nascidos, estabelecendo as bases para a melhoria da saúde e do bem-estar a curto e longo prazo. Uma experiência pós-natal positiva é definida como aquela em que as mulheres, pessoas que gestam, os recém-nascidos, os casais, os pais, os cuidadores e as famílias recebem informação consistente, garantia e apoio de profissionais de saúde motivados; e onde um sistema de saúde flexível e com recursos reconheça as necessidades das mulheres e dos bebês e respeite o seu contexto cultural.
Estas diretrizes consolidadas apresentam algumas recomendações novas e já bem fundamentadas sobre cuidados pós-natais de rotina para mulheres e neonatos que recebem cuidados no pós-parto em unidades de saúde ou na comunidade, independentemente dos recursos disponíveis.
É fornecido um conjunto abrangente de recomendações para cuidados durante o período puerperal, com ênfase nos cuidados essenciais que todas as mulheres e recém-nascidos devem receber, e com a devida atenção à qualidade dos cuidados; isto é, a entrega e a experiência do cuidado recebido. Estas diretrizes atualizam e ampliam as recomendações da OMS de 2014 sobre cuidados pós-natais da mãe e do recém-nascido e complementam as atuais diretrizes da OMS sobre a gestão de complicações pós-natais.
O estabelecimento da amamentação e o manejo das principais intercorrências é contemplada.
Recomendamos muito.
Vamos discutir essas recomendações no nosso curso de pós-graduação em Aleitamento no Instituto Ciclos.
Esta publicação só está disponível em inglês até o momento.
Prof. Marcus Renato de Carvalho
www.agostodourado.com
Novas diretrizes da OMS para os cuidados perinatais de mais qualidade
CJA update march 2016
1. Improving Health – Eliminating Disparities
Communities Joined in Action
Take-Home Advice from
Community Initiatives
Improving Health & Equity
A CJA UPDATE:
MONITORING THE NATIONAL LANDSCAPE
March 2016
The path towards achieving significant improvements in population health and equity can be winding
and bumpy.Yet, thousands of communities are currently moving forward on their important journeys.
These regular updates, produced by Communities Joined in Action (CJA), are intended to provide usable,
take-home advice that can accelerate communities’ efforts to towards achievement of better health and
well-being for their population.
Neither catalysts nor community organizations are alone in their interest in making measurable changes
towards health system transformation.A number of philanthropically funded initiatives recently launched
to bring together multisector collaborators to test innovative ways to achieve improved health measures
for all people.Additionally, government-funded efforts, such as the 65+ initiatives launched by the Center
for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation Center, focus on testing new payment and service delivery models.
By sharing successes and challenges from others doing similar work across the country, CJA hopes
to give communities useful perspectives and inspiration to accelerate achievement of their intended goals.
This update highlights the wisdom of 10 leaders of catalyst initiatives, as well as insights gained from
their experiences in working with community initiatives across the country.
2. Sustainable funding is a key piece to ensuring innovations
in health system transformation can get off the ground. Often
times, initiatives need to seek diverse funding sources for
long-term sustainability.
“Finding infrastructure capital is critical. It’s not just typically one source
of funding that will provide that base for your organization, so you have
to understand blended funding streams and how you can weave them
together to support your efforts,” says Brenda Leath, from Pathways
Community HUB Institute. Given that many HUBs are working
with underserved populations, Leath says creativity is often
required to craft a viable funding model.
This creativity needed to expand an organization’s funding base
may require nontraditional partnerships.
“Some of this requires tapping into organizations or industries that
are not typical partners of community health collaboratives,” explains
Annette Pope, from Communities Joined in Action.“This requires
a common agenda and a common language. Community health
collaboratives must understand what’s important to hospitals and
other payers and in turn hospitals and other payers must understand
what’s important to the community.”
COMMON THEMES EMERGED FROM
INTERVIEWS WITH CATALYST
LEADERS.
CJA IDENTIFIED OPPORTUNITIES
FOR LEARNING AROUND
THE FOLLOWING AREAS:
IDENTIFYING
SUSTAINABLE FUNDING
Engaging the right partners requires more than just a common
goal.Alignment of strategies, investments, and incentives are
all necessary to develop meaningful collaborations capable of
addressing multifactorial determinants of health and to achieve
meaningful health improvement.
“Local impact requires involvement from across sectors and must
reach those deeply embedded in the community,” acknowledges
Debbie Chang, from Moving Health Care Upstream (MHCU). Chang
recalls one of her team’s struggles with how to position adverse
childhood experiences and toxic stress to key stakeholders. By
working with the Building Community Resilience workgroup
at MHCU, the partners are creating a shared understanding of
adverse childhood experiences and toxic stress not as new areas
of concern, but as social determinants that are woven through
many chronic and preventable health conditions.
“The Building Community Resilience approach brings those parties
and voices from across sectors to the table as part of an overall
strategic approach to address the determinants that threaten the
health and well-being of children and families,” Chang explains.
“It has been a challenging journey as clinicians begin to recognize the
uphill road ahead in building meaningful and purposeful relationships
with community members and support organizations. But, we have
learned that creating shared understanding is a necessary first step in
helping clinicians understand their role in addressing those upstream
factors that exist well outside the clinic or hospital walls.”
Getting clinicians to think about upstream health factors is one
part of health system transformation.An even broader network
of engaged stakeholders is necessary and their incentive to
participate in population health efforts may not always be clear.
“We really have to fundamentally redesign the system, structures,
business, and relationships that are embedded in our current system,”
says Laura Landy, from ReThink Health.“When you move into this
transformation space, you actually have winners and losers.This
is going to change how we allocate resources so that people are
healthier and they don’t end up in the hospital as much. Some of the
amount of money that is now going to support health care has to
go to building housing and education and all those social determinants
of health that we don’t do as well as some of the other countries do.
So the questions are: Who do you get involved?What authority
do they have?What is their obligation to their organization
versus stewardship and shared responsibility for the health
of the community, the state or the nation?”
GLAVANZING
STAKEHOLDERS
IDENTIFYING
SUSTAINABLE
FUNDING
GALVANIZING
STAKEHOLDERS
SHARING
INFORMATION
MEASURING
PROGRESS
MAINTAINING
ADAPTABILITY
FOCUSING
ON UPSTREAM
HEALTH
DRIVERS
ENSURING
STAKEHOLDER
READINESS
UPHOLDING
VISION AND
FOCUS ON
INITIATIVE
GOALS
FOCUSINGMAINTAINING UPHOLDING
3. MEASURING
PROGRESS
Attracting collaborators and funders requires data. Data can
also be used to drive informed policy and programmatic decision
making based on demonstrated health needs. But, sharing
information can also help communities learn from each other,
such as providing each other evidence of what interventions
or approaches work in given types of communities.
For example, a number of state-level stakeholders were
instrumental in sharing data that inspired Ohio legislators
to appropriate funds to support certified HUB development.
“The HUB model is a good one and has proof of its use as an
evidence-based practice that has had major impact on moving from
volume-based payments to value-based payments,” says Brenda Leath,
from the Pathways Community HUB Institute. Leath says that
as a nonprofit her organization could not lobby for the
legislation, but her group has used the policy to create
opportunities for further HUB development. “We now have a
pipeline of HUBs that are currently in process for being reviewed for
certification. It was a snowball effect and the legislation had a lot of
influence in fostering additional interest, but everybody wants to know
what works and what works well. So it is important to be able to
promote the demonstration of initiatives.”
SHARING
INFORMATION
The Wellville team in Oregon used comprehensive local data
to articulate a compelling case for investing in the emotional
well-being of children. Comprehensive local data was used
to create a pitch to local funders and the region’s school
committees about the long-term value of an intervention to
improve student mental health and resilience.The Wellville
team highlighted the devastating impact of adverse childhood
experiences on a significant number of the county’s children
and the specific benefits of addressing this issue based on
success in neighboring states.
“Their business case made an emotional appeal, and also provided
compelling data on the benefits of reduced disciplinary incidents,
increased attendance, decreased need for Individual Education Plans
and other special education costs, and better outcomes for students,”
says Rick Brush, CEO ofWellville, sponsor of a five-community,
five-year health challenge.“The expected benefits would allow the
intervention to be self-funding after three years, producing net benefits
to the education system afterward.”
According to Brush, the team has implemented a trauma-
informed care approach in one school and is pursuing wider
implementation, while exploring other expected benefits
including increased employability and reduced health care
and juvenile justice costs.
Data is also key to measuring an initiative’s progress. Ensuring
that communities have the capacity to monitor and evaluate
their programs results in the development of tailored trainings
and tools specific to addressing community needs.
“People are not used to using data and measurement for their own
improvement.They are used to using data, as part of summative
evaluation, after the fact that they have to report, but they are not
necessarily using it as something that drives their own immediate
goals and improvements,” acknowledges Soma Stout, from SCALE.
“Our approach is a combination of education, coaching, and tools
to make it easier and more attractive for people to measure and to
learn and to use it to drive their own improvement goals in real time.
Instead of saying ‘What are you going to measure?’ we say
‘Whose life is getting better here and how do we know that?’”
In addition to driving improvement and goal attainment at
the community level, catalysts rely upon data and measurement
to assess whether their initiative is meeting the needs of the
communities they assist. Laura Brennan, from the Pathway to
Pacesetter Program (P2P), says their evaluation team is currently
assessing: the readiness of P2P communities; how their readiness
changes overtime; how P2P contributes to community readiness
and capabilities.
“Understanding these questions, will help us adapt and spread the
P2P program to meet the needs of communities and promote health,
well-being, and equity throughout the nation,” Brennan says.
Communities Joined in Action
4. MAINTAINING
ADAPTABILITY
Organizations must balance the need to focus on strategic goals,
while maintaining the ability to be adaptable on the ground to a
changing environment, community feedback, or evaluation data.
Leslie Mikkelsen, from the Prevention Institute’s Community
Centered Health Homes (CCHH) program, highlights the
institute’s ongoing learning to improve its approach to bridging
the gap between health services and community prevention.
“Recognizing that it takes time to institutionalize this new way of
thinking and doing across health care organizations, we are learning
that a dedicated CCHH manager or coordinator is uniquely positioned
in a clinic to interface with diverse staff and teams to help reinforce
our approach,” Mikkelsen says.“The institute is working on translating
and refining models, strategies, and tools to advance community
prevention in the health care system.We are delving deeper into
learning what it takes to support and implement CCHH on the
ground.We are mining the field for lessons from clinic-community
initiatives to hone in on the barriers and levers to accelerate this
paradigm shift.”
Soma Stout, from SCALE, illustrates how including people
with lived experience at the table alongside coalition leaders
is a critical part of maintaining adaptability in decision making
processes.
“We had been working with a community based organization that
focuses on youth unemployment and food insecurity.As they went
through the process of creating driver diagrams and figuring out how
to localize on a rapid cycle, there were some significant episodes of
violence in the city.They realized they could focus all of their efforts
on these real needs, but if they didn’t address the more prominent
concern around safety, they couldn’t achieve their ultimate goals,”
Stout explains.“So they broadened their mission to take on livable
neighborhoods. So, a big part of what we are trying to say is don’t
spend all your time, don’t spend a year in planning. By all means
take a step back and look at what needs to happen but then set
those aims and then begin to try them out in the world and see
what makes sense and what doesn’t make sense to move forward.”
The term health system transformation still conjures images
of the care delivery, despite the increasing recognition that
socioeconomic factors are real drivers of health and wellness.
Leaders of community health improvement efforts are aware
that a broader view must be employed that includes an
expansion of “health” stakeholders to include representatives
in the fields of housing, education, transportation, economic
development, and city planning—all of which will need to
play a role in supporting a system that supports keeping
people healthy and safe.
“The moments that signify the most progress towards this goal of
addressing all of the factors that influence length and quality
of life have been when I’ve seen communities move beyond saying
that social and economic factors are important to truly doing
something about it,” says JulieWillemsVan Dijk, from County Health
Rankings & Roadmaps.“Community leaders are open to learning and
taking new, and often uncharted, paths to connect with each other.”
WillemsVan Dijk recalls when a public health department
listened to the community and declared low high school
graduation rates as the top public health priority.The public
health department then worked with leaders from business,
FOCUSING ON
UPSTREAM HEALTH
DRIVERS
education, and other community organizations to deploy
strategies that raised that the rate of high school graduation
from 60 to 80 percent in just six years.
Often players in the health care delivery system are aware
of these inequities in health and social well-being, but the drivers
are deeply entrenched in under-resourced communities. Debbie
Chang, from Moving Health Care Upstream, discusses her
organization’s Building Community Resilience (BCR) workgroup’s
efforts to address deeply entrenched inequities in health and
social well-being. One of five BCR teams is working to build
resilience in an underserved Texas neighborhood that has
been in steep decline.
“Over the course of 30 years these three-zip-codes lost more than
half its middle class, leaving behind under-resourced neighbors who
lack access to public transportation, well-staffed schools, banking, and
the simple luxury of well-stocked grocery stores. Left unaddressed,
it is factors like these and other social determinants (such as
community and domestic violence, substandard housing conditions,
racism, and unemployment) that add up to toxic stress,” Chang says.
“Using BCR as an organizing platform for health practice, policy, and
social change this community initiative, in partnership with the local
children’s hospital, is developing a place-based network of child health
practitioners, community-based organizations, childcare providers, and
social service agencies to build resilience in the neighborhood and
among residents.There is a growing recognition that these upstream
drivers need to be addressed in order to help children, families,
and communities grow up healthy.”
5. ENSURING
STAKEHOLDER
READINESS
Transforming the health system is no easy job and while
stakeholders may be willing, they may not be fully ready to align
strategies and investments under a collaborative’s common
agenda.
“One of the biggest challenges that communities face in advancing
their health journey is when they believe that financial resources are
the solution to their problems,” warns JulieWillemsVan Dijk, from
County Health Rankings & Roadmaps.“Of course, money is
important, but it will never take the place of teams who have clear
direction, alignment and commitment around the goals they are
striving to achieve.And often, the process of creating trust and
shared purpose identifies resources within the community that
can be used to support their efforts.”
All organizations have faced funding challenges, but the
concepts of multisector collaboration and health equity are
new and often daunting. Stakeholders working together must
work to balance their own organizational agendas with the
priorities of the collaborative.And while, both might state they
share the end goal of wanting to improve the health of the
community, aligning individual and population needs is a challenge.
Karen Minyard, from Bridging for Health, shares her experience
of working with early-stage collaboratives around the concept
of stewardship.
“We shared this definition of stewardship and what stewardship
means with groups that were already action,” Minyard recalls.
“It was a not just an individual insight or a group insight, but many
of the people in the room started using stewardship language.They
were already thinking about if they have the right people at the table
and how they should build this way of thinking among their partners.
It began to change the way they think of their organization and their
role in that organization.”
Transforming the health system requires a shift in mindset
among stakeholders.While it is important to remain adaptive
in a rapidly changing environment, organizations must balance
the need to uphold the focus on the long-term vision and
initiative’s goals.
“One of the challenges in institutionalizing our Community-Centered
Health Homes (CCHH) model is expanding the mindset and culture
of health care from individual treatment to include community-wide
health. While there is increasing recognition of the importance of
addressing the community factors that impact health, it takes multiple
touchpoints for health care providers to become fully grounded in the
CCHH model and its upstream approach,” says Leslie Mikkelsen,
from the Prevention Institute.“We have found that starting with
where they are in improving clinical quality and reframing this to
include community prevention at every step has allowed them to
broaden their view from a focus on a single diagnosis or disease
UPHOLDING VISION
AND FOCUS ON
INITIATIVE GOALS
to understanding what factors in the community environment are
driving poor health outcomes in the first place, and then identifying
partners in the community to address those conditions.”
But, sometimes it is easier to focus on short-term milestones
than to maintain a long-term focus on system-wide
transformation.
“We cannot in this country point to what we would call a transformed
community.They don’t yet exist,” acknowledges Laura Landy, from
ReThink Health.“There is this sense of burnout when things get
difficult.You also have some of these earlier improvement stages. If you
do a great diabetes campaign and you reduce diabetes by 10 percent,
everybody says hooray and then they’re done and they go home. But, it
dispels the energy and the momentum that could have gone from that
point to a higher, bigger purpose around how you realign the behavior,
business models, and to actually change the system.”
Communities Joined in Action
6. Improving Health - Eliminating Disparities
COMMUNITIES JOINED IN ACTION
www.CJAonline.net
Improving Health – Elimin
FOLLOW US ON:
THE CATALYSTS
Bridging For Health: Improving Community Health
Through Innovations in Financing
Bridging for Health is fostering connections among diverse
stakeholders to align investments in health to achieve improved
population health outcomes.This is done through focusing on
innovations in financing; collaboration and collective impact; and
health equity.The Georgia Health Policy Center is the national
coordinating center of the initiative, supported by the Robert
Wood Johnson Foundation.
Community-Centered Health Homes
With Community-Centered Health Homes, the Prevention
Institute outlines an approach for community health centers
to promote community health, as they deliver high-quality
medical services to individual patients.The research-informed
recommendations provide steps to achieving improved
outcomes through the population health intervention model
including: inquiry (collecting data and forming partnerships),
analysis, and action.
CJA—Communities Joined in Action
CJA is a national, private, non-profit membership organization
with nearly 200 members representing a variety of public and
private organizations, all committed to improving health, access
to care, and eliminating disparities in their communities. CJA
mobilizes and assists these community health collaboratives
through its ability to broker important dialogues and to
convene stakeholders.The Georgia Health Policy Center
is the administrative home for CJA.
County Health Rankings & Roadmaps
County Health Rankings & Roadmaps provides a reliable source
of local data to help communities identify opportunities to
improve health.The annual Rankings measure vital health factors
to provide a snapshot of how geography influences health.
The Roadmaps provide guidance to understand the data and
strategies to move towards action.The program
is a collaboration of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation
and the University of Wisconsin Population Health Institute.
MHCU—Moving Health Care Upstream
Moving Health Care Upstream tests, shares, and accelerates
population health innovations.The focus is on helping clinic
systems go upstream.While the lens is children and families,
the work applies generally to communities and learnings
will be available on an open source platform. MCHU is funded
by The Kresge Foundation with additional support from the
Dorris Duke Charitable Foundation.
Pathway to Pacesetter
The Pathway to Pacesetter program is the result of the
100 Million Healthier Lives and the Spreading Community
Accelerators through Learning and Evaluation (SCALE) teams’
efforts to identify simple, scalable, affordable ways to make
meaningful technical assistance available to all communities.
The Pathway to Pacesetter program will support over 100
communities in accelerating their improvement journey.
PCHI—Pathways Community HUB Institute
PCHI is the certifying agent of the Pathways Community HUB
model of care coordination, which connects payment to the
value of services provided and actual improvements in health
outcomes. HUB Certification ensures an accountable and
sustainable community care coordination system that leads to
better health and lower costs. PCHI is supported by The Kresge
Foundation, in partnership with the Community Health Access
Project, Inc. and the Rockville Institute.
ReThink Health
ReThink Health works with communities to help them foster
catalytic leadership and test innovative ideas for bridging and
redesigning their health and health care systems to achieve
system-wide change. ReThink Health envisions a “healthy
health system”—one that bridges stakeholders from across
the community by focusing on the critical domains of active
stewardship, effective strategy, and sustainable financing. At the
core of its approach is the interactive ReThink Health Dynamics
Model.The Ripple Foundation and the Robert Wood Johnson
Foundation fund ReThink Health.
SCALE—Spreading Community Accelerators
through Learning and Evaluation
SCALE is the first community-based phase of the 100 Million
Healthier Lives initiative.The goal of SCALE is to equip
communities with skills and resources to achieve significant
community health improvement, to ultimately close equity
gaps.The 20-month SCALE intensive involves partnering of
“pacesetter” and “mentor” communities. SCALE, an Institute
for Healthcare Improvement initiative, is funded by the Robert
Wood Johnson Foundation.
Wellville
Wellville is a national, nonprofit organization helping
communities accelerate better health and financial outcomes
through entrepreneurial zeal and data-driven accountability.
Currently, five communities around the U.S. have committed
to a five-year challenge to make significant, visible, and lasting
improvement in measures of health and economic vitality.
Collectively, these initiatives could lead to big improvements
in the lives of the people who call these communities home.