Progress ReportSan Angelo City CouncilAugust 2, 2011
AgendaOverall project progressRadioactivity in the environmentSingle use Ion Exchange treatment updatePipe loop studyGround water treatment facility site locationOther treatment optionsQuestions
Overall Project Progress
Radioactivity in the environment
Radioactivity Is Ubiquitous in the Environment
Radioactivity Is Ubiquitous in the Environment
Safety ConsiderationsNo requirements for personnel badges, air monitors, or shieldingStandard OSHA requirements will be sufficientGloves and bootsWash handsStandard safety equipmentSupervisors and personnel should be trained to use radiation monitoring equipment, conduct radiation surveys, and collect soil samplesNot RequiredOSHA-RequiredRecommended
150’ = 15 Story BuildingHickory water can pass through soil without approaching regulatory limitSoilEnvironmental Impact of Pipe Break
Impact on Policies and ProceduresSoil, water, pipe scale samplesCollect water, soil, and scale samples at site of pipe breakRadiation survey instruments on maintenance trucks and in labDevelop standard documentation guide for pipe break eventsCareful documentation of surveys, samples, and personnelPhase 1 Environmental Assessment (all appropriate inquiry) [munitions dump; oil and gas production facilities; landfill]Guidefor Documenting Pipe BreaksRadiation survey instrumentsDocuments, forms, etc.
Case StudyCentral TX GraniteDistribution pipeGlazed salt shakerVaseline glass
SINGLE USE ION EXCHANGE UPDATE
Simplified Pilot Testing Process Flow Diagram
Results SummarySingle use ion exchange is effective in removing radium, however, breakthrough occurred more frequently than what was originally estimated using desktop models.Two of the three media proved to be effective
Single-Use Media Capital CostCost in $ Millions
Single-Use Media O&M CostCost in $ Millions
Pipe loop study
Pipe Loop StudyPurpose: Evaluate pipe scale and radionuclide deposition using various pipe materials, pipe velocities, and phosphate concentrations.
Preliminary Results & Observations of Pipe Loop Study
GWTF Site location
Groundwater Treatment Facility LocationTwo locations are considered for the groundwater treatment facility (GWTF)Hickory well siteCOSA Water Treatment Plant Several factors should be considered when evaluating the locations of the GWTFDecision should be based on what is best for COSA
   Factors Affecting Treatment Location
Results of Groundwater Treatment Facility (GWTF) Location EvaluationBased on the following factors: Capital CostO&M CostOperational efficiencyTreatment optionsWe recommend that the GWTF be located at the San Angelo Water Treatment Plant
Other treatment options
Single-Use Media NPV Cost ComparisonCost in $ Millions
Why look at other treatment options?NPV analysis of pilot test results indicated that additional treatment options may be viable Results indicated that Nanofiltration or Reverse Osmosis (NF/RO) could become a more competitive optionNF/RO offer alternate disposal options thus  reducing O&M costs.NF/RO will improve overall City water quality
RO at COSA WTP (90% Recovery)
NPV of Treatment Technologies at COSACost in $ Millions
NF/RO Treatment UpdateConducted preliminary desktop membrane models based on revised dataNanofiltrationLow energy Reverse Osmosis (RO)Brackish RO Low-energy RO may provide good rejection and recovery while minimizing energy needsNext steps: Membrane (RO) pilot plant investigation
RO Membrane Schedule
Single-Use Media Schedule
Questions & AnswersSan Angelo City CouncilAugust 2, 2011

City Council August 2, 2011 Hickory Ground Water Project Presentation

  • 1.
    Progress ReportSan AngeloCity CouncilAugust 2, 2011
  • 2.
    AgendaOverall project progressRadioactivityin the environmentSingle use Ion Exchange treatment updatePipe loop studyGround water treatment facility site locationOther treatment optionsQuestions
  • 4.
  • 6.
  • 7.
    Radioactivity Is Ubiquitousin the Environment
  • 8.
    Radioactivity Is Ubiquitousin the Environment
  • 9.
    Safety ConsiderationsNo requirementsfor personnel badges, air monitors, or shieldingStandard OSHA requirements will be sufficientGloves and bootsWash handsStandard safety equipmentSupervisors and personnel should be trained to use radiation monitoring equipment, conduct radiation surveys, and collect soil samplesNot RequiredOSHA-RequiredRecommended
  • 10.
    150’ = 15Story BuildingHickory water can pass through soil without approaching regulatory limitSoilEnvironmental Impact of Pipe Break
  • 11.
    Impact on Policiesand ProceduresSoil, water, pipe scale samplesCollect water, soil, and scale samples at site of pipe breakRadiation survey instruments on maintenance trucks and in labDevelop standard documentation guide for pipe break eventsCareful documentation of surveys, samples, and personnelPhase 1 Environmental Assessment (all appropriate inquiry) [munitions dump; oil and gas production facilities; landfill]Guidefor Documenting Pipe BreaksRadiation survey instrumentsDocuments, forms, etc.
  • 12.
    Case StudyCentral TXGraniteDistribution pipeGlazed salt shakerVaseline glass
  • 13.
    SINGLE USE IONEXCHANGE UPDATE
  • 14.
    Simplified Pilot TestingProcess Flow Diagram
  • 15.
    Results SummarySingle useion exchange is effective in removing radium, however, breakthrough occurred more frequently than what was originally estimated using desktop models.Two of the three media proved to be effective
  • 16.
    Single-Use Media CapitalCostCost in $ Millions
  • 17.
    Single-Use Media O&MCostCost in $ Millions
  • 18.
  • 19.
    Pipe Loop StudyPurpose:Evaluate pipe scale and radionuclide deposition using various pipe materials, pipe velocities, and phosphate concentrations.
  • 20.
    Preliminary Results &Observations of Pipe Loop Study
  • 21.
  • 22.
    Groundwater Treatment FacilityLocationTwo locations are considered for the groundwater treatment facility (GWTF)Hickory well siteCOSA Water Treatment Plant Several factors should be considered when evaluating the locations of the GWTFDecision should be based on what is best for COSA
  • 23.
    Factors Affecting Treatment Location
  • 24.
    Results of GroundwaterTreatment Facility (GWTF) Location EvaluationBased on the following factors: Capital CostO&M CostOperational efficiencyTreatment optionsWe recommend that the GWTF be located at the San Angelo Water Treatment Plant
  • 25.
  • 26.
    Single-Use Media NPVCost ComparisonCost in $ Millions
  • 27.
    Why look atother treatment options?NPV analysis of pilot test results indicated that additional treatment options may be viable Results indicated that Nanofiltration or Reverse Osmosis (NF/RO) could become a more competitive optionNF/RO offer alternate disposal options thus reducing O&M costs.NF/RO will improve overall City water quality
  • 28.
    RO at COSAWTP (90% Recovery)
  • 29.
    NPV of TreatmentTechnologies at COSACost in $ Millions
  • 30.
    NF/RO Treatment UpdateConductedpreliminary desktop membrane models based on revised dataNanofiltrationLow energy Reverse Osmosis (RO)Brackish RO Low-energy RO may provide good rejection and recovery while minimizing energy needsNext steps: Membrane (RO) pilot plant investigation
  • 31.
  • 32.
  • 33.
    Questions & AnswersSanAngelo City CouncilAugust 2, 2011