Download to read offline
![accepted the DDC's recommendation to approve the proposed scope, the Letter of
Intent (with the understanding that staff will present each Phase [1-4] for City
Council's review and approval for further direction), and authorized staff to
negotiate a contract with the terms from the earlier presentation, and to include the
identification of funding sources.
Catalyst Urban Development revised the Letter of Intent to include the approval
between each phase by the City Council. They also submitted a draft contract,
which has been reviewed, amended, discussed, and approved by the City
Attorney's office, and which is attached to this report. Conference calls and
meetings were held between various City staff and Catalyst to work through
insurance requirements, contract structuring, and other related matters.
The finished product, including land analysis, market-based programming, policy
context, ownership evaluation, project/location prioritization, implementation
timetable(s), project packaging, and identification of potential investors/developers
has led to - and is contained within - the attached draft document entitled
"Downtown Master Development Strategies". Acceptance of this document is the
goal behind the first agenda caption item.
Related Vision Item:
Provide adequate amenities for all neighborhoods.
Attract reinvestment.
Develop strategic plan for recruitment.
Examine liquidation of underutilized City properties.
Financial Impact:
The approved Phase I costs were for $68,000, plus
reimbursable expenses capped at $22,000. $66,000 of
the $68,000 has been paid out, while $7200 of the
$22,000 in reimbursable expenses has been paid out.
Attachments:
Letter of Intent dated December 18, 2012
City Council minute record from December 18, 2012
City Council minute record from May 21, 2013
Draft of "Downtown Master Development Strategies"
document
Presentation:
AJ Fawver, Interim Director of Development Services](https://image.slidesharecdn.com/agendapacket-131216082351-phpapp01/75/December-17-2013-Agenda-Packet-131-2048.jpg)
Uploaded byCity of San Angelo Texas
December 17, 2013 Agenda Packet
The document provides notice of a public meeting of the City Council of San Angelo, Texas to be held on December 17, 2013 at 9:00 AM at the McNease Convention Center. The agenda includes: opening session, consent agenda with various items for consideration, regular agenda with presentations from the Chamber of Commerce, Convention & Visitors Bureau, and Development Services Director, as well as discussions on downtown development strategies, compliance with zoning ordinances for parks, and a petition for annexation. The agenda also includes follow up issues, board nominations, and potential future agenda items.
More Related Content
December 17, 2013 Agenda Packet
- 1. NOTICE OF APUBLIC MEETING AN AGENDA OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS 9:00 A.M. - Tuesday, December 17, 2013 McNease Convention Center, South Meeting Room 500 Rio Concho Drive San Angelo, TX 76903 THE MCNEASE CONVENTION CENTER IS ACCESSIBLE TO PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES. ACCESSIBLE ENTRIES AND SPECIALLY MARKED PARKING SPACES ARE AVAILABLE AT BOTH MAIN ENTRANCES AT SURBER DRIVE AND RIO CONCHO DRIVE. IF ADDITIONAL ASSISTANCE IS NEEDED TO OBSERVE OR COMMENT, PLEASE NOTIFY THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK, ROOM 208, CITY HALL, 657-4405, AT LEAST 24 HOURS PRIOR TO THE MEETING. City Council meetings are broadcast on Channel 17-Government Access at 10:30 A.M. and 7:00 P.M. every day for two weeks beginning on the Thursday after each meeting. As a courtesy to those in attendance, please place your cell phone on “Silent” or “Vibrate” Thank You! I. OPEN SESSION (9:00 A.M.) A. Call to Order B. Prayer and Pledge "Honor the Texas flag; I pledge allegiance to thee, Texas, one state under God, one and indivisible.” C. Recognition “Central High School Girls Volleyball Team”, to be accepted by Coach Connie Bozarth and team members D. Public Comment The Council takes public comment on all items in the Regular Agenda. Public input on a Regular Agenda item will be taken at its appropriate discussion. Public input on an item not on the Agenda or Consent Agenda may be identified and requested for consideration by the Council at this time. The Council may request an item to be placed on a future agenda, or for a Consent Agenda item, to be moved to the Regular Agenda for public comment. On public hearing items, public input will be received on each item immediately following the Council discussion and prior to any action on the item. Each member of the public should make their remarks from the podium and begin by stating their name. Remarks by each citizen will be limited to three to five minutes, unless waived by a council member for all speaking on that matter. No individual will be allowed to speak more than once on any one subject until every citizen wishing to comment has done so. II. CONSENT AGENDA 1. Consideration of approving the December 3, 2013 City Council Regular meeting minutes 2. Consideration of awarding VM-14-13 Police Computers and Digital Video Equipment, utilizing the State DIR Contract# TX-DIR-SDD-1365, in an amount not to exceed $67,000.00 from VetSource Mobility and authorizing the City Manager to execute any necessary related documents (R.Kramer) City Council Agenda Page 1 of 4 December 17, 2013
- 2. 3. Consideration ofadopting a Resolution of the City of San Angelo authorizing the Mayor to execute a taxresale (quitclaim) deed conveying all right, title and interest of the City of San Angelo, and all other taxing units interested in the Tax Foreclosure Judgment or Tax Warrant: (C.Preas) a. 2517 Abilene Street, (Duran), Lot 2, Block 61, Hatcher, $2,100.00, Suite No. B-11-0178-TAX b. 136 11th Street, (TSU Properties), Lots 19 & 20, Block 56, Miles, $1,535.00, Suit No. D-12-0160-TAX c. 407 N Emerson Street, (Deanda), N60’ of Lots 15 & 16, Block 19, Ellis, $3,800.00, Suit No. C-110155--TAX 4. Consideration of approving an updated Interlocal Agreement between the City of San Angelo and The Cooperative Purchasing Network (TCPN) authorizing future City purchases as allowed by The State of Texas Government Code, Section 271, in substantially the attached from, and authorizing the City Manager to execute said Agreement (R.Banks) 5. Consideration of confirming the Park Commission’s appointment Ms. Julia Lane to serve and fill a 1st full term on the Park Commission (C.White) 6. Second Hearing and consideration of adopting an Ordinance amending Chapter 12, Exhibit “A” (Zoning Ordinance) of the Code of Ordinances, City of San Angelo (K.Boyd) Z13-37: SKG Engineering AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 12, EXHIBIT “A” OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS, WHICH SAID EXHIBIT “A” OF CHAPTER 12 ADOPTS ZONING REGULATIONS, USE DISTRICTS AND A ZONING MAP, IN ACCORDANCE WITH A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, BY CHANGING THE ZONING AND CLASSIFICATION OF THE FOLLOWING PROPERTY, TO WIT: 17 West 8th Street, located approximately 200 feet west of the intersection of West 8th Street and North Chadbourne Street. This property specifically occupies the Miles Addition, Block 23, Lot 5, in north central San Angelo, changing the zoning classification from Two-Family Residential (RS-2) to General Commercial (CG) District; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND PROVIDING A PENALTY 7. Second Hearing and consideration of adopting an Ordinance authorizing abandonments of public streets and right-of-ways in the Fairview Addition, Block 66, 67 and 74 in north central San Angelo (K.Boyd) AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE ABANDONMENT AND CLOSING OF UNIMPROVED STREETS AND ALLEY SEGMENTS, TO WIT: An 80' wide portion of the unimproved public right-of-way for Florence Street, extending approximately 680' northward from Hughes Street and immediately south of the railroad right-of-way (to include portions of the 100' right-of-way of Hughes Street), an approximately 100' x 270' portion of unimproved public right-ofway of Velma Street - And - a 20' x 430' alley right-of-way in Blocks 66 and 67 and 20' x 35' alley right-of-way in Block 74 of the Fairview Addition, in north central San Angelo; AUTHORIZING THE CONVEYANCE THEREOF TO THE ABUTTING PROPERTY OWNERS; PROVIDING FOR THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF ABANDONMENT AND CONVEYANCE; AND PROVIDING FOR THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE AND DELIVER A QUIT CLAIM DEED TO THE ABUTTING PROPERTY OWNERS 8. Second Hearing and consideration of adopting an Ordinance authorizing abandonments of public streets and right-of-ways in the Miles Addition Block 32 in north-central San Angelo (K.Boyd) AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE ABANDONMENT AND CLOSING OF THE FOLLOWING ALLEY, TO WIT: An approximately 20 foot wide x 495 foot long portion of alley running east to west, perpendicular to Martin Luther King Drive located in Block 32 of the Miles Addition in north-central San Angelo; AUTHORIZING THE CONVEYANCE THEREOF TO THE ABUTTING PROPERTY OWNERS; PROVIDING FOR THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF ABANDONMENT AND CONVEYANCE; AND PROVIDING FOR THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE AND DELIVER A QUIT CLAIM DEED TO THE ABUTTING PROPERTY OWNERS City Council Agenda Page 2 of 4 December 17, 2013
- 3. III. REGULAR AGENDA: D.EXECUTIVE/CLOSED SESSION Executive Session under the provision of Government Code, Title 5. Open Government; Ethics, Subtitle A. Open Government, Chapter 551. Open Meetings, Subchapter D. Exceptions to Requirement that Meetings be Open under the Section 551.074(a)(1) to deliberate the evaluation and duties of the City Manager and Section 551.072 to deliberate the purchase, exchange, lease, or value of real property regarding lease of City owned property in the downtown area E. PUBLIC HEARING AND COMMENT 9. Presentation of the 3rd and 4th Quarter 2013 Reports from the Chamber of Commerce Economic Development Council and the Convention & Visitors Bureau (CVB) (Presentation by CVB Vice President Pamela Miller and Vice President for Economic Development John Dugan) 10. Discussion and possible acceptance of Downtown Master Development Strategies document prepared by Catalyst Urban Development as part of PL-01-12 (Presentation by Interim Development Services Director AJ Fawver) 11. Discussion and possible action regarding strategies for obtaining compliance with Zoning Ordinance for existing parks around San Angelo containing recreational vehicles, manufactured housing, and mobile homes (Presentation by Interim Development Services Director AJ Fawver) 12. Discussion and consideration of petition seeking annexation (to San Angelo’s City limits) of certain property situated directly north, south, east and west of San Angelo and encompassing a vacant 4 acre tract extending southwest from Southland Boulevard and located directly east of an 8.995 acre tract annexed to the City Limits on March 5, 2013 that comprised the Prestonwood Addition, Section Two (Presentation by Interim Development Services Director AJ Fawver) 13. Consideration of adopting a Resolution casting votes for one nominee or distributing them among nominees for a position on the Board of Directors of the Tom Green County Appraisal District for the January 1, 2014 through December 31, 2015 term of office (Presentation by City Clerk Alicia Ramirez) F. FOLLOW UP AND ADMINISTRATIVE ISSUES 14. Consideration of and possible action on matters discussed in Executive/Closed Session, if needed 15. Consideration of approving various Board nominations by Council and designated Councilmembers: a. Airport Board: Patrick Nuytten (SMD4) to a 2nd full term October 2017, David Herbert (SMD5) to a 2nd full term October 2017, Elizabeth Grindstaff (SMD6) to a 1st full term October 2017, and Dave Dierker (Mayor) to a 1st full term October 2017 b. Civic Events Board: Timothy Condon (SMD2) to a 2nd full term October 2016 c. Design & Historic Review Commission: Margaret Mallard (SMD4) to a 2nd full term September 2015 and David Mazur (Mayor) to a 2nd full term September 2015 d. Parks & Recreation Advisory Board: Susan Gober (SMD1) to an unexpired term December 2015 e. Public Art Commission: Quang Le (SMD2) to a 1st full term April 2015 f. Water Advisory Board: Paul Alexander (SMD3) to a 1st full term September 2015 16. Announcements and consideration of Future Agenda Items 17. Consideration of conducting future evening City Council meetings City Council Agenda Page 3 of 4 December 17, 2013
- 4. 18. Adjournment The CityCouncil reserves the right to consider business out of the posted order, and at any time during the meeting, reserves the right to adjourn into executive session on any of the above posted agenda items which are not listed as executive session items and which qualify to be discussed in closed session under Chapter 551 of the Texas Government Code. Given by order of the City Council and posted in accordance with Title 5, Texas Government Code, Chapter 551, Thursday, December 12, 2013, at 5:00 P.M. /s/________________________ Alicia Ramirez, City Clerk City Council Agenda Page 4 of 4 December 17, 2013
- 5.
- 6. CITY COUNCIL MINUTERECORD The City of San Angelo Tuesday, December 3, 2013 Page 59 Vol. 105 OPEN SESSION BE IT REMEMBERED City Council convened in a regular meeting at A.M., Tuesday, December 3, 2013, in the San Angelo McNease Convention Center, 500 Rio Concho Drive, San Angelo, Texas. All duly authorized members of the Council, to-wit: Mayor, Dwain Morrison Councilmember Rodney Fleming Councilmember Marty Self Councilmember Johnny Silvas Councilmember Don Vardeman Councilmember H.R. Wardlaw Councilmember Charlotte Farmer were present and acting, with the exception of Councilmember Wardlaw, thus constituting a quorum. Whereupon, the following business was transacted: An invocation was given by Father Rodney White and pledge was led by Lizzie Ireland, 5th Grader at Cornerstone Christian School. PROCLAMATIONS AND RECOGNITIONS “Concho Christmas Celebration Day”, Saturday, December 7, 2013, was accepted by Lee Pfluger, President of Concho Christmas Celebration “Giving Tuesday, December 3, 2013”, will be presented to Kaete Sullivan, Development Director of ICD, Inc., Stonebridge Training Residence, Newbridge Family Shelter, and Roland Nadeau, Public Relations & Marketing with Christians in Action “River Fest Committee”, Coordination of and hosting by various organizations and individuals of the River Fest, a celebration of the completion of the Concho River Improvements Project and the 100th Anniversary of Santa Fe Park PUBLIC COMMENT No public comments were made. CONSENT AGENDA APPROVAL OF THE NOVEMBER 19, 2013 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES CONSIDERATION OF AWARDING THE COMPETITIVE SEALED PROPOSAL WU-02-13 FOR THE 2013 RIO CONCHO SEWER LINE IMPROVEMENTS TO DARNELL CONSTRUCTION, LLC OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS IN THE AMOUNT OF $2,093,869.54, AUTHORIZING STAFF TO NEGOTIATE A CONTRACT, AND AUTHORIZATION FOR THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE SAID CONTRACT AND ANY RELATED DOCUMENTS (Discussed in Regular Session) ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A CONSULTING SERVICES AGREEMENT AND ANY NECESSARY RELATED DOCUMENTS BETWEEN THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS AND MGT OF AMERICA, INC., FOR THE PROVISION OF TWO SEPARATE INDIRECT COST ALLOCATION PLANS; ONE BEING AN ANNUAL
- 7. Page 60 Vol. 105 Minutes December3, 2013 OMB A-87 COMPLIANT INDIRECT COST ALLOCATION PLAN BASED ON ACTUAL COSTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2012, AND THE OTHER BEING AN ANNUAL GAAP COMPLIANT FULL COST ALLOCATION BASED ON BUDGETED COSTS FOR FY 2014, SAID AGREEMENT BEING IN THE AMOUNT $11,500.00 AND TO BE EFFECTIVE DECEMBER 1, 2013 THROUGH NOVEMBER 30, 2014, AND PROVIDING FOR AN OPTION TO RENEW FOR TWO (2) ADDITIONAL YEARS (Page 69, #201312-160) ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION RATIFYING ACCEPTANCE BY THE CITY MANAGER ON BEHALF OF THE CITY, OF THE TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY FISCAL YEAR 2013 EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT PERFORMANCE GRANT (EMPG) AWARD #13TX-EMPG-0885 IN THE REVISED AMOUNT OF SIXTY-TWO THOUSAND SEVEN HUNDRED NINETY-FIVE AND 35/100 DOLLARS ($62,795.35); AND AUTHORIZATION FOR THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE ANY OTHER RELATED DOCUMENTS (Page 71, #2013-12-161) SECOND HEARING AND CONSIDERATION OF ADOPTING AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 10, TRAFFIC CONTROL REGARDING THE OPERATION OF GOLF CARTS (Discussed in Regular Session) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS, AMENDING CHAPTER 10, TRAFFIC CONTROL, OF THE SAN ANGELO CODE OF ORDINANCES, TO ADD A NEW ARTICLE 10.1700, ENTITLED “OPERATION OF GOLF CARTS ON PUBLIC STREETS” IN ORDER TO ALLOW AND REGULATE THE OPERATION OF GOLF CARTS ON ANY PART OF THE TRAFFIC AREA OF ANY PUBLIC STREET OR HIGHWAY WITHIN THE CITY LIMITS WHERE THE POSTED SPEED LIMIT IS NOT MORE THAN THIRTY (30) MILES PER HOUR, PROVIDING DEFINITIONS, ESTABLISHING LIMITATIONS ON SUCH OPERATION, ESTABLISHING REQUIREMENTS FOR EQUIPMENT, ANNUAL REGISTRATION, ESTABLISHING ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESSES, ESTABLISHING A REGISTRATION FEE, PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR THE VIOLATION OF THIS ORDINANCE, AND AMENDING APPENDIX A, ENTITLED ARTICLE 3.000 BUSINESS RELATED FEES TO ADD A NEW SECTION 3.1300 GOLF CART REGISTRATION FEE; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS ORDINANCE SECOND HEARING AND ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CONTINUANCE TO LEVY AND COLLECT A ONE-HALF CENT SALES AND USE TAX AS APPROVED BY THE VOTERS IN THE NOVEMBER 2, 2010 SPECIAL ELECTION (Page 73 , #2013-12-162) AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ARTICLE 2.3600 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS BY AMENDING SECTION 2.3606 TO ADD A NEW SUBSECTION 1 TO INCLUDE THE PROJECTS ALLOWED IN SECTION 4B OF ARTICLE 5190.6 V.A.C.S., AS AMENDED, (HEREINAFTER “ACT”) FOR THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO TO CONTINUE TO LEVY AND COLLECT A ONE-HALF CENT SALES AND USE TAX, SAID PROJECTS HAVING BEEN APPROVED BY THE VOTERS IN THE NOVEMBER 2, 2010 SPECIAL ELECTION TO BE UNDERTAKEN AS ALLOWED BY THE ACT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RESULTS OF THE SAID SPECIAL ELECTION; AND TO RESTATE AND RENUMBER SECTION 2.3606 IN ITS ENTIRETY; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND, PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE
- 8. Minutes December 3, 2013 Page61 Vol. 105 SECOND HEARING AND CONSIDERATION OF ADOPTING AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE 2013-2014 BUDGET (Discussed in Regular Session) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO AMENDING THE BUDGET FOR THE FISCAL YEAR BEGINNING OCTOBER 1, 2013, AND ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 2014, FOR ENCUMBRANCES, RESTRICTED AND DEDICATED MONIES, INCOMPLETE PROJECTS, AND GRANTS CONSIDERATION OF SELECTING IMAGE TREND FOR RFP FD-02-13, AUTHORIZING STAFF TO NEGOTIATE A FIRE DEPARTMENT RECORDS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO AND IMAGE TREND FOR SOFTWARE, ANNUAL MAINTENANCE AND HARDWARE, AND FOR ADDITIONAL HARDWARE TO BE PURCHASED FROM OTHER VENDORS, IN A TOTAL COMBINED AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $210,000.00, AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE SAID CONTRACT AND ANY RELATED DOCUMENTS (Discussed in Regular Session) Motion, to approve the Consent Agenda, as presented, was made by Councilmember Farmer and seconded by Councilmember Fleming. Motion carried unanimously. REGULAR AGENDA: PUBLIC HEARING AND COMMENT AWARD OF THE COMPETITIVE SEALED PROPOSAL WU-02-13 FOR THE 2013 RIO CONCHO SEWER LINE IMPROVEMENTS TO DARNELL CONSTRUCTION, LLC OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS IN THE AMOUNT OF $2,093,869.54, AUTHORIZING STAFF TO NEGOTIATE A CONTRACT, AND AUTHORIZATION FOR THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE SAID CONTRACT AND ANY RELATED DOCUMENTS Responding to a question from Councilmember Silvas, Assistant Water Utilities Director Kevin Krueger informed the project is budgeted under the Wastewater Capital Improvements Program. Motion, to award project to Darnell Construction, LLC, as presented, was made by Councilmember Silvas and seconded by Councilmember Vardeman. Councilmember Self abstained from the vote. Motion carried unanimously. SECOND HEARING AND ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 10, TRAFFIC CONTROL REGARDING THE OPERATION OF GOLF CARTS (Page 77, #2013-12-163) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS, AMENDING CHAPTER 10, TRAFFIC CONTROL, OF THE SAN ANGELO CODE OF ORDINANCES, TO ADD A NEW ARTICLE 10.1700, ENTITLED “OPERATION OF GOLF CARTS ON PUBLIC STREETS” IN ORDER TO ALLOW AND REGULATE THE OPERATION OF GOLF CARTS ON ANY PART OF THE TRAFFIC AREA OF ANY PUBLIC STREET OR HIGHWAY WITHIN THE CITY LIMITS WHERE THE POSTED SPEED LIMIT IS NOT MORE THAN THIRTY (30) MILES PER HOUR, PROVIDING DEFINITIONS, ESTABLISHING LIMITATIONS ON SUCH OPERATION, ESTABLISHING REQUIREMENTS FOR EQUIPMENT, ANNUAL REGISTRATION, ESTABLISHING ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESSES, ESTABLISHING A REGISTRATION FEE, PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR THE VIOLATION OF THIS ORDINANCE, AND AMENDING APPENDIX A, ENTITLED ARTICLE 3.000 BUSINESS RELATED FEES TO ADD A NEW SECTION 3.1300 GOLF CART REGISTRATION FEE; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS ORDINANCE Responding to a question from Councilmember Fleming, Assistant Police Chief Kevin Hollway clarified state law allows the use of golf carts for those persons living within a 2 mile radius of a golf course; therefore, these individuals will be exempt from registration and inspection process as outlined in the newly adopted ordinance. Motion, to adopt the Ordinance, as presented, was made by Councilmember Fleming and seconded by Councilmember Self. Motion carried unanimously.
- 9. Page 62 Vol. 105 Minutes December3, 2013 SECOND HEARING AND ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE 2013-2014 BUDGET (Page 83, #2013-12-164) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO AMENDING THE BUDGET FOR THE FISCAL YEAR BEGINNING OCTOBER 1, 2013, AND ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 2014, FOR ENCUMBRANCES, RESTRICTED AND DEDICATED MONIES, INCOMPLETE PROJECTS, AND GRANTS Responding to a question from Councilmember Vardeman, Civic Events Manager Angelica Pena stated staff has been working on the Coliseum Roof renovation project and the project is not included within this budget amendment. She informed staff hired an engineer to conduct an assessment of the roof. Ms. Pena stated after further review of the purchasing options, staff will utilize the Buyboard option. Assistant City Manager Rick Weise stated the project may possibly start after the Rodeo event. Motion, to adopt the Ordinance, as presented, was made by Councilmember Vardeman and seconded by Councilmember Farmer. Motion carried unanimously. SELECTION OF IMAGE TREND FOR RFP FD-02-13, AUTHORIZING STAFF TO NEGOTIATE A FIRE DEPARTMENT RECORDS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO AND IMAGE TREND FOR SOFTWARE, ANNUAL MAINTENANCE AND HARDWARE, AND FOR ADDITIONAL HARDWARE TO BE PURCHASED FROM OTHER VENDORS, IN A TOTAL COMBINED AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $210,000.00, AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE SAID CONTRACT AND ANY RELATED DOCUMENTS Responding to a question from Mayor Morrison, Assistant City Manager Rick Weise explained this item is not the collection service but the internal operating software. Assistant Fire Chief Scott Farris noted this is the second request for proposal on the software and the company is from Minnesota. Responding to a question from Councilmember Vardeman, Mr. Farris informed the software is viable for up to 10 years with access to future parts and a 5 year maintenance provision is also included at $15K per year. Motion, to authorize the selection of Image Trend, as presented, was made by Mayor Morrison and seconded by Councilmember Farmer. Motion carried unanimously. PUBLIC HEARING AND APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE 2013 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN FOR USE OF CDBG FUNDS FOR NEIGHBORHOOD BLITZ AND AUTHORIZING STAFF TO SUBMIT SAID AMENDMENT TO HUD Neighborhood and Family Services Director Bob Salas presented background information. He informed a key part of the project involves replacing siding on depilated houses and in order to fund the project, staff is requesting approval to reallocate $102,969.00 of CDBG funds from complete rehabilitations to housing rehabilitations associated with the annual Neighborhood Blitz. Councilmember Vardeman spoke in opposition and suggested concentrated efforts should be made on complete house rehabilitations. Mr. Salas stated a specific program exists for such rehabilitations as well as projects associated through the Helping Hands Organization. However, he explained due to dwindling funds, the number of rehabilitations projects has tremendously decreased. Councilmember Vardeman suggested allocating these funds to the Helping Hands organization. Motion, to authorize the amendment, as presented, was made by Councilmember Silvas and seconded by Councilmember Farmer. Responding to a question from Councilmember Fleming, Mr. Salas stated the program is highly supported by the sponsors and are in support of the amendment. General discussion was held on non-essential City employees conducting the work, the total costs of the program, conducting complete renovations, and the number of volunteers from various organizations. Councilmember Vardeman clarified he is in support of the program however restated his difference in philosophy.
- 10. Minutes December 3, 2013 Page63 Vol. 105 Public comments were made by West Texas Organizing Strategy representatives Craig Meyers, Jerry Sea, and Tim Davenport-Herbst in support of the program and fund reallocation. A vote was taken on the motion on the floor. Motion carried unanimously. RECESS At 9:52 A.M., Mayor Morrison called a recess. RECONVENE At 10:10 A.M., Council reconvened, and the following business was transacted: Mayor Morrison announced the City Manager Daniel Valenzuela was attending the West Texas Consortium meeting in Big Spring. AUTHORIZATION OF THE 2014 PREMIUMS FOR HEALTH, DENTAL AND POST-65 HEALTH INSURANCE, AUTHORIZATION TO UTILIZE THE $201,288.00 ERRP FUNDS AND $180,300.00 FROM THE BUDGETED REVENUE OVER EXPENDITURES (AKA RAINY DAY FUND) TO OFFSET PREMIUM INCREASES AS DESCRIBED, AUTHORIZATION TO UTILIZE THE REMAINING BUDGETED REVENUE OVER EXPENDITURES (AKA RAINY DAY FUND) FOR RETIREE DENTAL INCREASE, AND AUTHORIZATION TO INCREASE FOR THE STOP LOSS INSURANCE COVERAGE, AS PRESENTED Human Resources Director Lisa Marley presented background information. A copy of the presentation is part of the Permanent Supplemental Record. Responding to a question from Councilmember Farmer, Ms. Marley explained the Early Retiree Reinsurance Program noting the program is used as an incentive to companies to keep retirees less than age 62 on their insurance programs. She noted state law dictate specific uses of the funds to offset the employer or participants costs. General discussion was held on term of the contract, the eligible hospitals under the current plan, future increase projections, negotiating for two providers, and the limited number of providers under the current plan. Assistant City Manager/Chief Financial Officer Michael Dane commented on the administrative burdens created by the plan. Motion, to utilize the $201,288 ERRP funds and $180,300 from the budgeted revenue over expenditures (aka Rainy Day Fund) to offset premium increases as described, and the remaining Rainy Day Fund for Retiree dental increase, and to increase for the Stop Loss, as presented, was made by Councilmember Farmer and seconded by Councilmember Vardeman. Public comment was made by Retiree Russell Smith. Councilmember Fleming expressed his concerns of future higher increases and suggested maintaining some reserve funds for such increases. Ms. Marley stated staff will work diligently to negotiate the lower increases. A vote was taken on the motion on the floor. Motion carried unanimously. SECOND PUBLIC HEARING AND ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO’S APPLICATION OF EXISTING POLICIES REGARDING COMMERCIAL PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT MORATORIUM AND RELATED MATTERS (Page 87, #2013-12-165) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS, (“CITY”) ADOPTING A COMMERCIAL PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT MORATORIUM IN ACCORDANCE WITH STATE LAW UPON PUBLIC HEARING AND ISSUANCE OF WRITTEN FINDINGS; TO EXPIRE NINETY (90) DAYS AFTER THE DATE THE MORATORIUM IS ADOPTED; INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, APPROVAL OF NEW APPLICATIONS FOR COMMERCIAL PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT RELATING TO MOBILE HOMES,
- 11. Page 64 Vol. 105 Minutes December3, 2013 MANUFACTURED HOUSING PARKS AND RECREATIONAL VEHICLE PARKS; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE Councilmember Silvas left the meeting at 10:43 A.M. Responding to a question from Mayor Morrison, Councilmember Fleming stated he had no further questions. Motion, to adopt the Ordinance, as presented, was made by Councilmember Fleming and seconded by Councilmember Farmer. Motion carried unanimously. Councilmember Silvas returned to the meeting at 10:44 A.M. FIRST PUBLIC HEARING AND INTRODUCTION OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 12, EXHIBIT “A” (ZONING ORDINANCE) OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF SAN ANGELO Z13-37: SKG Engineering AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 12, EXHIBIT “A” OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS, WHICH SAID EXHIBIT “A” OF CHAPTER 12 ADOPTS ZONING REGULATIONS, USE DISTRICTS AND A ZONING MAP, IN ACCORDANCE WITH A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, BY CHANGING THE ZONING AND CLASSIFICATION OF THE FOLLOWING PROPERTY, TO WIT: 17 West 8th Street, located approximately 200 feet west of the intersection of West 8th Street and North Chadbourne Street. This property specifically occupies the Miles Addition, Block 23, Lot 5, in north central San Angelo, changing the zoning classification from Two-Family Residential (RS-2) to General Commercial (CG) District; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND PROVIDING A PENALTY Planner Kevin Thomas Boyd presented background information. A copy of the presentation is part of the Permanent Supplemental Record. Motion, to introduce the Ordinance, as presented, was made by Councilmember Vardeman and seconded by Councilmember Silvas. AYE: Morrison, Fleming, Self, Silvas, Vardeman, and Wardlaw. NAY: Farmer. Motion carried 5-1. FIRST PUBLIC HEARING AND INTRODUCTION OF AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING ABANDONMENTS OF PUBLIC STREETS AND RIGHT-OF-WAYS IN THE FAIRVIEW ADDITION, BLOCK 66, 67 AND 74 IN NORTH CENTRAL SAN ANGELO AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE ABANDONMENT AND CLOSING OF UNIMPROVED STREETS AND ALLEY SEGMENTS, TO WIT: An 80' wide portion of the unimproved public right-of-way for Florence Street, extending approximately 680' northward from Hughes Street and immediately south of the railroad right-of-way (to include portions of the 100' right-of-way of Hughes Street), an approximately 100' x 270' portion of unimproved public right-of-way of Velma Street - And - a 20' x 430' alley right-of-way in Blocks 66 and 67 and 20' x 35' alley right-of-way in Block 74 of the Fairview Addition, in north central San Angelo; AUTHORIZING THE CONVEYANCE THEREOF TO THE ABUTTING PROPERTY OWNERS; PROVIDING FOR THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF ABANDONMENT AND CONVEYANCE; AND PROVIDING FOR THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE AND DELIVER A QUIT CLAIM DEED TO THE ABUTTING PROPERTY OWNERS Planner Kevin Thomas Boyd presented background information. A copy of the presentation is part of the Permanent Supplemental Record. General discussion was held on the property and possible use. Public comment was made by Proponent Lee Pfluger. Motion, to introduce the Ordinance, as presented, was made by Councilmember Vardeman and seconded by Councilmember Fleming. Motion carried unanimously.
- 12. Minutes December 3, 2013 Page65 Vol. 105 FIRST PUBLIC HEARING AND INTRODUCTION OF AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING ABANDONMENTS OF PUBLIC STREETS AND RIGHT-OF-WAYS IN THE MILES ADDITION BLOCK 32 IN NORTH-CENTRAL SAN ANGELO AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE ABANDONMENT AND CLOSING OF THE FOLLOWING ALLEY, TO WIT: An approximately 20 foot wide x 495 foot long portion of alley running east to west, perpendicular to Martin Luther King Drive located in Block 32 of the Miles Addition in north-central San Angelo; AUTHORIZING THE CONVEYANCE THEREOF TO THE ABUTTING PROPERTY OWNERS; PROVIDING FOR THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF ABANDONMENT AND CONVEYANCE; AND PROVIDING FOR THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE AND DELIVER A QUIT CLAIM DEED TO THE ABUTTING PROPERTY OWNERS Planner Kevin Thomas Boyd presented background information. A copy of the presentation is part of the Permanent Supplemental Record. Mr. Boyd stated staff is requesting approval subject to special conditions, specifically sewer/water line access. Motion, to introduce the Ordinance, as presented, was made by Councilmember Vardeman and seconded by Councilmember Self. Motion carried unanimously. PUBLIC HEARING AND APPROVAL OF THE 2012 CONSOLIDATED ANNUAL PERFORMANCE AND EVALUATION REPORT (CAPER) AND AUTHORIZATOIN FOR STAFF TO SEND CAPER TO HUD Neighborhood and Family Services Director Bob Salas presented background information. A copy of the presentation is part of the Permanent Supplemental Record. Councilmember Farmer left the meeting at 11:00 A.M. General discussion was held on the roof repair program and available grant funds, and the MHMR group homes within neighborhoods and the related zoning classification. Councilmember Farmer returned to the meeting at 10:04 A.M. Motion, to approve the report, as presented, was made by Councilmember Silvas and seconded by Councilmember Vardeman. Motion carried unanimously. AUTHORIZATION FOR STAFF TO NEGOTIATE THE PURCHASE OF A FIRE ENGINE VIA BUYBOARD PURCHASING COOP FROM HALL MOTORS A FERRARA DEALER, AUTHORIZATION FOR ADDITIONAL EQUIPMENT PURCHASES FROM OTHER VENDORS, IN A TOTAL COMBINED AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $460,000.00, AND AUTHORIZATION FOR THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE SAID CONTRACT AND ANY RELATED DOCUMENTS Assistant Fire Chief Scott Farris presented background information. Motion, to authorize the purchase, as presented, was made by Councilmember Self and seconded by Councilmember Fleming. General discussion was held on the equipment which may be replaced, possibly auctioning or reserving the older vehicle for future use, and housing reserve units at the fire stations. A vote was taken on the motion on the floor. Motion carried unanimously. APPROVAL OF A BOARD NOMINATION BY COUNCIL AND DESIGNATED COUNCILMEMBERS: Zoning Board of Adjustment: John Haydn (SMD2) to a 1st term January 2015 Motion, to approve the board nomination by Council and designated Councilmembers, was made by Councilmember Farmer and seconded by Councilmember Silvas. Motion carried unanimously. RECESS At 11:12 A.M., Mayor Morrison called a recess.
- 13. Page 66 Vol. 105 Minutes December3, 2013 RECONVENE At 11:46 A.M., Council reconvened, and the following business was transacted: EXECUTIVE/CLOSED SESSION At 11:46 A.M., Council convened in Executive Session under the provision of Government Code, Title 5. Open Government; Ethics, Subtitle A. Open Government, Chapter 551. Open Meetings, Subchapter D. Exceptions to Requirement that Meetings be Open, Section 551.071(2) to consult with its attorney on a matter in which the duty of the attorney to the governmental body under the Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct of the State Bar of Texas clearly conflicts with this chapter; Section 551.072 to deliberate the purchase, exchange, lease, or value of real property regarding recreational, agricultural and grazing leases and Airport/Mathis Field property; Section 551.074(a)(1) to deliberate the evaluation and duties of the City Manager; and Section 551.087 to discuss an offer of financial or other incentive to Hirschfeld Energy Systems, LLC with whom the City of San Angelo is conducting economic development negotiations and which the City of San Angelo seeks to have, locate, stay or expand in San Angelo. RECESS At 12:52 P.M., Mayor Morrison called a recess. RECONVENE At 12:59 P.M., Council reconvened, and the following business was transacted: FOLLOW UP AND ADMINISTRATIVE ISSUES CONSIDERATION OF MATTERS DISCUSSED IN EXECUTIVE/CLOSED SESSION No action was taken on matters discussed in Executive/Closed Session. ANNOUNCEMENTS AND CONSIDERATION OF FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS Assistant City Manager/Chief Financial Officer Michael Dane distributed the proposed December 17, 2013 Agenda and solicited Council comments and suggestions. Councilmember Vardeman requested an update on Capital outlay priorities and the ½ sales tax items Councilmember Farmer requested a report regarding the pros and cons, including associated costs, of adding line item for previous year activity to the Budget Blue Book. ADJOURNMENT Motion, to adjourn, was made by Councilmember Farmer and seconded by Councilmember Self. Motion carried unanimously. The meeting adjourned at 1:02 P.M. THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO ___________________________________ Dwain Morrison, Mayor ATTEST: _______________________________ Alicia Ramirez, City Clerk
- 14. Minutes December 3, 2013 Page67 Vol. 105 In accordance with Chapter 2, Article 2.300, of the Official Code of the City of San Angelo, the minutes of this meeting consist of the preceding Minute Record and the Supplemental Minute Record. Details on Council meetings may be obtained from the City Clerk’s Office or a video of the entire meeting may be purchased from the Public Information Officer at 481-2727. (Portions of the Supplemental Minute Record video tape recording may be distorted due to equipment malfunction or other uncontrollable factors.)
- 15. City of SanAngelo Memo Date: November 27, 2013 To: Councilmembers From: Ryan Kramer, Vehicle Maintenance Subject: Agenda Item for December 17, 2013 Contact: Ryan Kramer, Vehicle Maintenance - 657-4329 x1651 Caption: Consent Consideration of VM-14-13 Police Computers and Digital Video Equipment, utilizing the State DIR Contract# TX-DIR-SDD-1365, in an amount not to exceed $67,000 from VetSource Mobility and authorizing the City Manager or designee to execute any necessary related documents. Summary: The Vehicle Maintenance Department solicited quotes for portable computers and digital video equipment for use in new Police and Municipal Court patrol vehicles. History: Quotes were requested for computers and digital video equipment that are to be installed in Police Patrol and Municipal Court vehicles. The equipment brand and model requested is specific so-as to maintain compatibility with existing server hardware and software. A vendor and their submitted pricing, if approved, will be used for additional purchases for ordering equipment throughout the term year. Financial Impact: The City recommends awarding the quote in its entirety to VetSource Mobility through DIR pricing. Purchases will not exceed $67,000 from General Fund capital accounts. Any additional equipment needs exceeding the original amount requested will be presented to council prior to purchase. Related Vision Item: NA Other information/Recommendation: Staff recommends awarding the bid in its entirety to VetSource Mobility (Clarksville, TN) Attachments: Quote Tabulation Reviewed by: Chief Tim Vasquez, Chief of Police X:RK DocumentsBid Documents20142014 Equipment BidsAgenda SubmissionsBackground Memo VM-14-13 - Police IT Equipment.docx
- 16. CITY OF SANANGELO BID TABULATION *VM-14-13/Police IT Equipment* November 27, 2013 Estimated Quantity Item John Wright & Assoc. Description 1. Laptop Computer 14 2. Three Year Warranty 3. Digital Video G-Force Sensors Unit Price VisualPro 360 Extended Price Unit Price No Quote VetSource Mobility Extended Price Extended Price Unit Price $ 3,867.00 $ 54,138.00 $ 3,739.00 14 0 $ 250.00 $ 3,500.00 $ 230.00 $ $ 3,332.00 $ 239.00 $ Extended Price 3,220.00 238.00 Unit Price 3,346.00 14 0 $ 4. 1 0 5. 1 $ 52,346.00 0 Total Bid 0 NO BID- Did not submit $ $ 60,970.00 $ 58,912.00 $ -
- 17. City of SanAngelo Memo Date: December 3, 2013 To: Mayor and Councilmembers From: Cindy M. Preas, Real Estate Administrator (657-4407) Subject: Agenda Item for December 17, 2013 Council Meeting Contact: Diana Farris, Property Specialist (657-4407) Caption: Consent Item Consideration of adopting a Resolution of the City of San Angelo authorizing the mayor to execute a tax-resale (quitclaim) deed conveying all right, title and interest of the City of San Angelo, and all other taxing units interested in the Tax Foreclosure Judgment or Tax Warrant: a) 2517 Abilene Street, (Duran), Lot 2, Block 61, Hatcher, $2,100, Suite No. B-11-0178-TAX b) 136 11th Street, (TSU Properties), Lots 19 & 20, Block 56, Miles, $1,535 Suit No. D-12-0160-TAX c) 407 N Emerson Street, (Deanda), N60’ of Lots 15 & 16, Block 19, Ellis, $3,800, Suit No. C-11-0155--TAX Summary: The subject properties were auctioned at Sheriff’s Sale. No offers were received causing subject properties to be stuck-off to the City, as Trustee for itself and the other taxing entities. History: The attached Property Analysis reflects amounts of delinquent taxes, accrued penalties, interest, attorney fees and costs for delinquent years of, together with additional penalties and interest at the rates prescribed by Chapter 33, Tex. Propety Financial Impact: Upon approval: (1) The City will retain a $500 Administration fee; (2) The balance will be distributed according to the judgment or tax warrant on the Sheriff’s Return; and (3) Property will be reinstated back onto tax roll. Related Vision Item Financial Vision – Examine liquidation of unused or underperforming city-owned properties (if applicable): Neighborhood Vision – Attract reinvestment Other Information/ Recommendation: Staff recommends approval. Attachments: Property Analysis, Resolution, Tax-Resale Deed and Property Location Map Presentation: N/A Publication: N/A Reviewed by Director: Lysia H. Bowling, City Attorney Adopted: 5/30/03 Revised: 6/21/10
- 18.
- 19. A RESOLUTION OFTHE CITY OF SAN ANGELO AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE A TAX-RESALE (QUITCLAIM) DEED CONVEYING ALL RIGHT, TITLE AND INTEREST OF THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO, AND ALL OTHER TAXING UNITS INTERESTED IN THE TAX FORECLOSURE JUDGMENT WHEREAS, by Sheriff’s Sale, the properties described below were struck-off to the City of San Angelo, Trustee, pursuant to delinquent tax foreclosure decrees of the 119th, 340th and 391st Judicial Districts, Tom Green County, Texas; and WHEREAS, offers have been made for the purchase of said properties pursuant to Section 34.05, Texas Tax Code Ann.(Vernon, 1982); and NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO that its Mayor, Dwain Morrison, is hereby authorized to execute a Tax-Resale (quitclaim) Deed conveying the following described real properties to the following as specified below, all of the right, title, and interest of the City of San Angelo, and all other taxing units interested in the tax foreclosure judgment, located in San Angelo, Tom Green County, Texas: Conveying to: MIGUEL DURAN, single person; ($2,100): Lot 2, Block 61, Hatcher Addition, City of San Angelo, Tom Green County, Texas, as described in Volume 816, Page 470, Official Public Records of Real Property, Tom Green County, Texas. Account #14-26900-0061-002-00 TSU PROPERTIES LLC, Domestic Limited Liability Company (LLC); ($1,535): Lots 19 and 20, Block 56, Miles Addition, City of San Angelo, Tom Green County, Texas, as described in a deed recorded in Instrument No. 659215, Official Public Records, Tom Green County, Texas. Account #19-34200-0056-016-00 SALVADOR DEANDA, a single person; ($3,800): North 60 feet of Lots 15 and 16, Block 19, Ellis Addition, City of San Angelo, Tom Green County, Texas, as described in a deed recorded in Volume 664, Page 55, Official Public Records of Real Property, Tom Green County, Texas. Account #08-21900-0019-018-00
- 20. APPROVED AND ADOPTEDON THE DAY OF , 2013. THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO Dwain Morrison, Mayor Attest: Alicia Ramirez, City Clerk Approved As to Content: Approved As to Form: Cindy M. Preas, Real Estate Administrator Lysia H. Bowling, City Attorney
- 33. City of SanAngelo Memo Date: December 5, 2013 To: Mayor and Councilmembers From: Roger S. Banks, Purchasing Division Subject: Agenda Item for December 17, 2013 Council Meeting Contact: Roger S. Banks, Purchasing Division, (325) 657-5180 Caption: CONSENT Item Consideration of approving an updated Interlocal Agreement between the City of San Angelo and The Cooperative Purchasing Network (TCPN) authorizing future City purchases as allowed by The State of Texas Government Code, Section 271 and authorizing the Mayor and/or City Manager to execute said Agreement. Summary: The City of San Angelo has been a member of this TCPN since 2005. This request is seeking approval to update the agreement continue to allow the City of San Angelo to participate in this cooperative purchasing group with other municipalities, county governments, and school districts. History: The State of Texas Government Code, Section 271 has given municipalities the authority to participate in cooperative purchasing programs to increase the efficiency and effectiveness of local governments by authorizing them to contract, to the greatest possible extent, with one another and with agencies of the state. This authority also satisfies the state law requiring the local government to seek competitive bids. Purchasing Co-ops assist local governments, by pooling procurement resources, meeting the needs of the participants through volume purchasing and by reducing the cost and time associated with individual purchasing procedures. The City of San Angelo currently participates in several purchasing co-ops including the Texas Department of Information Resources (DIR), Houston Galveston Area Council of Governments (HGAC), U.S. Communities, Buyboard.com, etc. The TCPN is sponsored by the Region VII Education Service Center (ESC4), located in Houston, Texas and is governed by the Region 4 ESC Board of Directors. TCPN is available for use by all schools, colleges, universities, cities, counties, and other government entities in the States of Texas. They offer a wide variety competitive bid services and products to the membership. Financial Impact: There is no cost relating to membership or purchasing administrative fees associated with TCPN membership. Standard City and State purchasing approval procedures are required for all purchases made using cooperative contracts
- 34. Related Vision Item NA (ifapplicable): Other Information/ Recommendation: Staff recommends approval Attachments: 2013 Interlocal Agreement, 2005 Interlocal Agreement Presentation: None Publication: NA Reviewed by Director: Tina Bunnell, Finance Department, Approved by Legal: December 2, 2013
- 44. City of SanAngelo Memo Meeting Date: December 3, 2013 To: City Council members From: Kevin Boyd, Planner Subject: Z13-37: SKG Engineering, a request for approval of a zone change from Two-Family Residential (RS-2) to General Commercial (CG) to allow for activities allowed within CG zoning districts shown in Section 310 of the Zoning Ordinance, on the following property: Location: 17 West 8th Street, located approximately 200 feet west of the intersection of West 8th Street and North Chadbourne Street; more specifically occupying the Miles Addition, Block 23, Lot 5, in north central San Angelo. Purpose: Approval of this request would zone the property Two-Family Residential (RS-2) Contacts: SKG Engineering, Representative Kevin Boyd, Planner Caption: First Public Hearing and consideration of introduction of an Ordinance amending Chapter 12, Exhibit “A” (Zoning Ordinance) of the Code of Ordinances, City of San Angelo 325-655-1288 325-657-4210 Z13-37: SKG Engineering AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 12, EXHIBIT “A” OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS, WHICH SAID EXHIBIT “A” OF CHAPTER 12 ADOPTS ZONING REGULATIONS, USE DISTRICTS AND A ZONING MAP, IN ACCORDANCE WITH A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, BY CHANGING THE ZONING AND CLASSIFICATION OF THE FOLLOWING PROPERTY, TO WIT: 17 West 8th Street, located approximately 200 feet west of the intersection of West 8th Street and North Chadbourne Street. This property specifically occupies the Miles Addition, Block 23, Lot 5, in north central San Angelo, changing
- 45. the zoning classificationfrom Two-Family Residential (RS-2) to General Commercial (CG) District; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND PROVIDING A PENALTY Summary: The City Council may: (1) Approve the proposed zone change as requested; or (2) Modify the application to some alternative zoning classification believed to be more appropriate; or (3) Deny the proposed zone change, altogether. Recommendation: Planning staff recommends approving the proposed zone change request from Two-Family Residential (RS-2) to General Commercial (CG). Planning Commission recommended approval of this request by a vote of 6-0 on November 18, 2013. 2
- 46. History and Background: GeneralInformation Existing Zoning: Two-Family Residential (RS-2) Existing Land Use: Vacant, undeveloped tract Surrounding Zoning/Land Use: North: West: South: East: Two-Family Residential (RS-2) and General Commercial / Heavy Commercial (CG/CH) Two-Family Residential (RS-2) and Office Commercial (CO) Two-Family Residential (RS-2), Office Commercial (CO) and Heavy Commercial (CH) General Commercial / Heavy Commercial (CG/CH) and Heavy Commercial (CH) Thoroughfares/Streets: Single-family detached housing Single-family detached housing, vacant tracts Houston Harte Expressway, Window Depot, single-family detach housing and vacant tracts Los Magueyes Bakery, Super Uniforms, Brothers Automotive, Val’s Home Appliances Furniture Center, Stripes gas station and vacant tracts West 18th Street is identified as a "local street", and is designed to carry light neighborhood traffic at low speeds. North Chadbourne Street is identified as a "major arterial street" and is designed to connect collector streets to freeways and other arterials carrying large volumes of traffic at high speeds. Access is secondary and mobility is the primary function of these streets. Zoning History: The property was annexed within the city prior to 1949. As far back as 1964, the property has been zoned Two-Family Residential (RS-2). Applicable Regulations: Allowed uses for this property can be found in Section 310 (Use Table) of the Zoning Ordinance. Development Standards: Nonresidential district standards are outlined in Section 502.B. of the Zoning Ordinance. 3
- 47. All required off-streetparking and the connection(s) to a public right-of-way are required to be paved. Vision Plan Map: Related Comp Plan Excerpts: Commercial “Promote better transition between nearby commercial and residential use of land and buildings.” "Require a buffer separating commercial, industrial, or agricultural zoned lands from neighborhoods." "Establish transition areas to better "scale-down" intensity of use from commercial centers to neighborhoods." "...slowly reorganize commercial corridors into clusters..." "Create new physical neighborhoods lined with intermediate uses." connections to transitional and Special Information Traffic Concerns: Changing the zoning from residential to commercial is likely to generate additional traffic than if the property remained as-is. Parking Requirements: Vary depending upon the use of the property, see Section 511. Parking Provided: No parking exists as the tract remains vacant and undeveloped at this time. Density: Surrounding properties are low to medium density residential and commercial in nature. The Vision Plan calls for 'Commercial' type development for the site in question. Notification Required: Yes Notifications Sent: 11 Responses in Favor: 1 4
- 48. Responses in Opposition: 0 Analysis: Inorder to approve this zone change request, the City Council members are first required to consider the following criteria: 1. Compatible with Plans and Policies. Whether the proposed amendment is compatible with the Comprehensive Plan and any other land use policies adopted by the Planning Commission or City Council. 2. Consistent with Zoning Ordinance. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would conflict with any portion of this Zoning Ordinance. 3. Compatible with Surrounding Area. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment is compatible with existing and proposed uses surrounding the subject land and is the appropriate zoning district for the land. 4. Changed Conditions. Whether and the extent to which there are changed conditions that require an amendment. 5. Effect on Natural Environment. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would result in significant adverse impacts on the natural environment, including but not limited to water and air quality, noise, storm water management, wildlife, vegetation, wetlands and the practical functioning of the natural environment. 6. Community Need. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment addresses a demonstrated community need. 7. Development Patterns. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would result in a logical and orderly pattern of urban development in the community. The staff recommendation is based upon the statements listed below. Staff believes that the proposed zone change meets all of the criteria outlined, thus recommending approval of a zone change to General Commercial (CG). This request is compatible with the city's plans and polices, as the Vision Plan envisions the property and much of the properties to the east to be designated as ‘Commercial’. Additionally, properties to the north as well as the parcel directly to the west are designated to be commercial in nature. The category ‘Commercial’ seeks to provide business and retail related opportunities and fits with CO, CG, and CH zoning, and CN zoning. The long- 5
- 49. range plan callsfor future commercial development for the area along North Chadbourne Street between Houston Harte Expressway and West 12th Street, several blocks to the north. Although the site is currently zoned residential, the proposed request is more reflective of aspects in the Vision Plan as well as future development patterns for the area. The request is consistent with aspects of the Zoning Ordinance. Although it was stated that they do not have a specific use in mind, they have discussed ideas of having an office building, water or ice sales, or other something that would fall under the allowed uses in the district. The district will introduce a wide range of uses – 'Retail Sales and Services' for example, provides opportunities for personal services, entertainment and product repair or services for consumer and business goods. Examples may include animal grooming, branch banks, restaurants, hotels, offices and convenience stores (Section 315.G, Zoning Ordinance). Some conditional uses allowed in CG zoning include game halls, equipment rental, vehicle repair (full service repair), warehouse and freight movement, waste-related uses and wholesale trade (Section 310, Zoning Ordinance). Some of the more intensive uses permissible in the district are self-service storage facilities, repair-oriented businesses and limited outdoor storage. The district allows for ‘Type 2: Limited Outdoor Storage’, which prohibits outdoor storage to exceed 1,000 square feet or 10 percent of the total site area, whichever is greater – a privacy fence is not required in this circumstance, unless said property abuts a residential zoning district or use (Sections 504 and 509, Zoning Ordinance). While North Chadbourne is clearly defined as a major commercial corridor, much of the 0 Block of West 8th Street is zoned for residential uses. The lot in question, as well as some adjoining lots remain vacant, open space. While much of the lots to the north and west of the property are currently zoned residential, this portion of the block displays a lower density of housing units, characterized by vacant and partially vacant lots. There has been a transition of uses along the block. As a result, the boundary between the zones has become blurred, meaning that it is becoming more difficult to decipher residential properties from those that are commercial. The area already has a good mix of commercial and residential development – at the intersection with North Chadbourne Street is a furniture store, gas station, bakery and specialty clothing store – approval of this request will further solidify the area as part of the nearby commercial corridor. These lots are similar in area and dimension measure roughly 50’ x 100’. A majority of the lots to the north are zoned Two-Family Residential (RS-2), – the property is adjacent to the west is zoned Office Commercial (CO), and Heavy Commercial (CH) immediately east of the site. The proposed CG zoning is an appropriate transition of zoning from CG/CH, CH and CO zoning, within the block (refer to the site map below). This request represents changed conditions to the current Ordinance, in that, RS-2 limits development to residential uses, notably, single-family detached and two-family dwellings (Section 311, Zoning Ordinance). In addition to changing the zoning from 6
- 50. residential to commercial,the proposed change will allow for greater allowances in building setbacks, maximum height and a higher FAR ratio. In a CG zone, the required front yard or setback is 25 feet, the side or rear yard varies from 0 – 10 feet, depending on whether or not the property abuts a residential use or zoning district (Section 502, Zoning Ordinance). There is no maximum building height for the district and the Floor Area Ratio, FAR, or maximum buildable space is 2 or twice the total area for the lot. This request is consistent with the commercial designation of the Comprehensive Plan, as such an amendment to the Vision Plan Map of this document is not required to approve this request. Staff expects that the proposed zone change may have some impact on the natural environment. The change will introduce a wide range of commercial development opportunities, in both scale and type. That being said, potential impacts are greatly tied to the nature of the project – given the allowed uses for the district, such changes will not significant. The site remains a vacant lot, mainly comprised of open space – a number of trees and vegetation exist on the property, the removal of vegetation in developing the tract will have a relatively small impact on the environment. Staff must consider, given the small lot size, 50’ x 100’ or (5,000 sq ft), future plans may trigger future subdivision requests in the area with the means to enlarge the tract to meet greater demands for large scale commercial projects. Conceivably there can be greater storm water runoffs generated from buildings or structures that have larger building footprints. An internal site review will be conducted by city staff will ensure that any approved project directs runoff away from neighboring properties or require effective screening. The requested zoning represents a community need. Vacant and abandoned homes left unmaintained is a dangerous combination and serves as potential blight in the community, as demolition of such structures can generate an improved quality of living for residents of surrounding properties. The proponent’s decision to rezone the property to something more practical is a conscious step in revitalizing that section of the block. The site boasts close proximity to major roadways and commercial development; the request cleans up and offers a nice transition between existing zoning. The site is within 200 feet of North Chadbourne Street, which is identified as a minor arterial. Houston Harte Expressway is also very accessible from the site. The requested zone change and proposed development will offer suitable infill opportunities for the tract of land that has serve as vacant, open space for many years. It will also enable development which provides a buffer between uses, a transition from neighborhood serving commercial to nearby residential uses and zoning. The location also provides close proximity to shops and other services, such a transition stimulates the environment for walkable communities. The presence of mix uses within a confined space reduces the demand for automobile use and enhances the nature of the area - further creating places where people can live, shop and work, thus establishing sustainable environments. 7
- 51. Proposed Conditions N/A Attachments: Excerpt fromzoning map, showing the general location within the City of San Angelo; Excerpt from zoning map, highlighting subject property; Aerial photo, highlighting subject property; Excerpt from the comprehensive plan vision map highlighting the subject property; Excerpt of the favor/opposition notification map; Citizen Response; Draft minutes from 11/18/13 Planning Commission Meeting; and Draft Ordinance. Presentation: Kevin Boyd, Planner Reviewed by: Jeff Hintz, Interim Senior Planner (11/8/13) 8
- 59. AN ORDINANCE AMENDINGCHAPTER 12, EXHIBIT “A” OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS, WHICH SAID EXHIBIT “A” OF CHAPTER 12 ADOPTS ZONING REGULATIONS, USE DISTRICTS AND A ZONING MAP, IN ACCORDANCE WITH A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, BY CHANGING THE ZONING AND CLASSIFICATION OF THE FOLLOWING PROPERTY, TO WIT: 17 West 8th Street, located approximately 200 feet west of the intersection of West 8th Street and North Chadbourne Street. This property specifically occupies the Miles Addition, Block 23, Lot 5, in north central San Angelo, changing the zoning classification from Two-Family Residential (RS-2) to General Commercial (CG) District; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND PROVIDING A PENALTY RE: Z 13-37: SKG Engineering WHEREAS, the Planning Commission for the City of San Angelo and the governing body for the City of San Angelo, in compliance with the charter and the state law with reference to zoning regulations and a zoning map, have given requisite notice by publication and otherwise, and after holding hearings and affording a full and fair hearing to all property owners and persons interested, generally, and to persons situated in the affected area and in the vicinity thereof, is of the opinion that zoning changes should be made as set out herein; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO: SECTION 1: That the basic zoning ordinance for the City of San Angelo, as enacted by the governing body for the City of San Angelo on January 4, 2000 and included within Chapter 12 of the Code of Ordinances for the City of San Angelo, be and the same is hereby amended insofar as the property hereinafter set forth, and said ordinance generally and the zoning map shall be amended insofar as the property hereinafter described: 17 West 8th Street, located approximately 200 feet west of the intersection of West 8th Street and North Chadbourne Street. This property specifically occupies the Miles Addition, Block 23, Lot 5, in north central San Angelo, shall henceforth be permanently zoned as follows: General Commercial (CG) District. The Director of Planning is hereby directed to correct zoning district maps in the office of the Director of Planning, to reflect the herein described changes in zoning. SECTION 2: That in all other respects, the use of the hereinabove described property shall be subject to all applicable regulations contained in Chapter 12 of the Code of Ordinances for the City of San Angelo, as amended. SECTION 3: That the following severability clause is adopted with this amendment: SEVERABILITY:
- 60. The terms andprovisions of this Ordinance shall be deemed to be severable in that, if any portion of this Ordinance shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the other provisions of this Ordinance. SECTION 4: That the following penalty clause is adopted with this amendment: PENALTY: Any person who violates any provisions of this article shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and, upon conviction, shall be subject to a fine as provided for in Section 1.106 of the Code of Ordinances for the City of San Angelo. Each day of such violation shall constitute a separate offense. INTRODUCED on the 3rd day of December, 2013 and finally PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED on this the 17th day of December, 2013. THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO ____________________________________ Dwain Morrison, Mayor ATTEST: ________________________________ Alicia Ramirez, City Clerk Approved As To Content: Approved As To Form: _________________________ AJ Fawver, Planning Manager ________________________ Lysia H. Bowling, City Attorney
- 61. City of SanAngelo Memo Meeting Date: December 3, 2013 To: City Council members From: Kevin Boyd, Planner Subject: Street and alley abandonment request, Fairview Addition Block 66, 67 and 74, a request for abandonment of the following properties: Location: An 80' wide portion of the unimproved public right-of-way for Florence Street, extending approximately 680' northward from Hughes Street and immediately south of the railroad right-of-way (to include portions of the 100' right-of-way of Hughes Street), an approximately 100' x 270' portion of unimproved public right-of-way of Velma Street - And - a 20' x 430' alley right-of-way in Blocks 66 and 67 and 20' x 35' alley right-ofway in Block 74 of the Fairview Addition, in north central San Angelo. Contacts: Southwest Orient Properties LLC, Owner Kevin Boyd, Planner Caption: First Public Hearing and consideration of introduction of an Ordinance authorizing abandonments of public streets and right-of-ways in the Fairview Addition, Block 66, 67 and 74 in north central San Angelo 325-944-4444 325-657-4210 AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE ABANDONMENT AND CLOSING OF UNIMPROVED STREETS AND ALLEY SEGEMENTS, TO WIT: An 80' wide portion of the unimproved public right-ofway for Florence Street, extending approximately 680' northward from Hughes Street and immediately south of the railroad rightof-way (to include portions of the 100' right-of-way of Hughes Street), an approximately 100' x 270' portion of unimproved public right-of-way of Velma Street - And - a 20' x 430' alley right-of-way in Blocks 66 and 67 and 20' x 35' alley right-of-way in Block 74 of the Fairview Addition, in north central San Angelo; AUTHORIZING THE CONVEYANCE THEREOF TO THE ABUTTING PROPERTY OWNERS; PROVIDING FOR THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF ABANDONMENT AND CONVEYANCE; AND PROVIDING FOR THE
- 62. MAYOR TO EXECUTEAND DELIVER A QUIT CLAIM DEED TO THE ABUTTING PROPERTY OWNERS Summary: The City Council may: 1) Approve the proposed abandonment; or 2) Approve the proposed abandonment subject to conditions; or 3) Deny the proposed abandonment. Recommendation: City staff recommends approving, subject to conditions mentioned in this report. Planning Commission recommended approval of this request by a vote of 6-0 on November 18, 2013.
- 63. History and Background: Lastmonth, the applicants, Southwest Orient Properties, LLC., filed a request to formally abandon the a series of adjoining alleys in the Fairview Addition, Blocks 66, 67 and 74, in north central San Angelo. The immediate area is sandwiched between two rail crossings – one terminates slightly pass the site, to the south, the other is a major rail line that runs across town (across South Bryant Blvd, Knickerbocker Rd and the Loop) and transports freight into the city from the east and west. Close proximity of the rail lines has had a dramatic impact on development in the surrounding area which is a mix of heavy industrial and agricultural land uses. The presence of the railways allow for easy transporting of goods. More specifically, the proposed alleyway runs laterally to the north of Culwell Street. Much of it will be the abandoning of Hughes Street, Florence Street and Velma Street, which spans roughly 680', also in the request to be abandoned is a roughly 20' x 430' alley right-of-way in Blocks 66 and 67 of the Fairview Addition and 20' x 35' alley right-of-way in Block 74 of the Fairview Addition. It area is quite sizeable and measures slightly more than 75,500 square feet. Whenever an alley is officially abandoned, it is divided at the centerpoint and deeded to the adjacent property owners – since the proponent owns much of the adjoining area on either side of the proposed abandonment, if approved and all measures are carried out, much of the abandoned sections will be handed over to the proponent. General Information Existing Zoning: Heavy Manufacturing (MH) Existing Land Use: Southwest Orient Properties, LLC. Surrounding Zoning/Land Use: North: West: South: Heavy Manufacturing (MH) Heavy Manufacturing (MH) Heavy Manufacturing (MH) East: Heavy Manufacturing (MH) Open land Bollman Industries (livestock) Acme Iron & Metal Co. (strap yard), Zafiro Bar and Clark's Auto Parts and Wrecker Service San Angelo Packing Company Warehouse, Republic Services (waste management and recycling services)
- 64. Storm Water/Drainage: Abandoning thealley is not expected to affect drainage in the area. Topography: Abandoning the alley is not expected to change the topography of the area. Water/Sewer Utilities: Water Utilities is requesting for a 20' utility and access easement for the existing water line on the property. The access easement will need to extend from the water line to Hughes right-of-way. Fire Protection: Abandoning the alley is not expected to affect fire protection in the area. Access Management: Abandoning the alley is not expected to affect access management in the area. Notification required: Yes Notifications Sent: 7 Received In favor 0 Received in opposition 0 Special Information Private Utilities: N/A Basis for Recommendation After an internal review of the site, staff finds that there is no real interest in maintaining the requested unimproved street right-of-ways and alleyways. The portions of Hughes Street, Florence Street and Velma Street right-of-ways do not appear to have ever been improved (paved to street specifications) or fully utilized as a street, at any point in time. Currently the proponents, Southwest Orient Properties, LLC., has utilized the site with their operations for quite some time. The triangular shaped tract, bounded by both sides by the railroad tracts, makes serious development of site impractical - the odd configuration of the site restricts future land development of the area. With the exception of a water line that extends slightly within the right-of-way of unimproved Velma Street, no other public utility exist within the identified area. In reviewing the nature of this request, staff has uncovered series abandonments that has occurred in the generalized area between North Bell Street and the westernmost point of the tracts, over the past few years. Approvals of such abandonments, including the abandoned portion situated immediately to the west of the site, further solidify the city's need to relinquish the rights of the specified area. Additionally, abandonment will not negatively impact the accessibility of nearby and adjacent streets and is compatible with aspects of the Thoroughfare Plan for the area.
- 65. Given the circumstancesoutlined, it would be more beneficial for the city to relinquish ownership of the identified properties. With abandoning of these sections, staff is requesting that a 20' utility and access easement be required with approval and extend to the Hughes Street right-of-way to allow for city access to the existing water line along Velma Street. Proposed Conditions 1. Provide a survey and metes and bounds decsription of the property to be abandoned, performed under the direction of a registered professional land surveyor. 2. City Water Utilities requires a 20' utility and access easement for the existing water line on the property. The access easement will need to extend from the water line to Hughes Street right-of-way. 3. Replatting the property abandoned and adjacent to the abandonment into one contiguous lot. Attachments: Excerpt from zoning map, showing the general location within the City of San Angelo; Excerpt from zoning map, highlighting subject property; Aerial photo, highlighting subject property; Original plat of the Fairview Addition from 1906; Existing water and sewer lines in the area; and Water Utilities site comments on survey. Presentation: Kevin Boyd, Planner Reviewed by: Jeff Hintz, Interim Senior Planner (11/08/13)
- 72. City of San Angelo Memo MeetingDate: December 3, 2013 To: City Council members From: Jeff Hintz, Interim Senior Planner Subject: A request to abandon a segment of alley right-of-way on the following property: Property: An approximately 20 foot wide x 490 foot long portion of alley running east to west, parallel to and in-between West 8th Street & West 9th Street, bounded to the east by Martin Luther King Drive. This alleyway is shown on the plat document of the Miles Addition, Block 32, in north-central San Angelo. Purpose: Approval would formally close the alleyway. Contacts: Charity Vasquez, SAISD Jeff Hintz, Interim Senior Planner Caption: AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE ABANDONMENT AND CLOSING OF THE FOLLOWING ALLEY, TO WIT: An approximately 20 foot wide x 495 foot long portion of alley running east to west, perpendicular to Martin Luther King Drive located in Block 32 of the Miles Addition in north-central San Angelo; AUTHORIZING THE CONVEYANCE THEREOF TO THE ABUTTING PROPERTY OWNERS; PROVIDING FOR THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF ABANDONMENT AND CONVEYANCE; AND PROVIDING FOR THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE AND DELIVER A QUIT CLAIM DEED TO THE ABUTTING PROPERTY OWNERS. Summary: The City Council may: (1) Approve the proposed abandonment; 947-3759 657-4210
- 73. (2) Modify ofthe abandonment conditions to those believed to be more appropriate; or (3) Deny the proposed abandonment. Recommendation: City staff recommends approving the proposed abandonment, subject to conditions outlined in this staff report. Planning Commission recommended approval 6-0 on the Consent Agenda at the November 18, 2013 meeting. History and Background: General Information Existing Zoning: Two-Family Residential (RS-2) Existing Land Use: Alley lies between buildings on the Carver school site and is currently unimproved Surrounding Zoning/Land Use: North: West: South: East: RS-2 RS-2 RS-2 RS-2 School Building North Bryant Boulevard School Building Martin Luther King Drive Storm Water/Drainage: The abandonment is not expected to create any drainage issues. Topography: Abandonment of the right-of-way is not expected to generate any elevation problems or issues. Water/Sewer Utilities: Requires a 20' open and unobstructed utility easement be reserved in this alleyway to provide future access to facilities. Fire Protection: No Fire Access issues are expected to be generated as a result of this abandonment. Access Management: No access management issues are anticipated as a result of this abandonment. Notification Required: Yes Notifications Sent: 18 Responses in Favor: 0
- 74. Responses in Opposition: 0 SpecialInformation Private Utilities: This abandonment is not anticipated to create any concerns for private utilities Traffic Concerns: Traffic patterns for this area should remain unaffected. This portion of alley has never been improved and the individual lots served by this alleyway are all owned by the proponent of this particular request. Rationale for staff's recommendation: This alleyway has effectively been closed for years. It is un-improved at this time and several trees hinder anyone from actually travelling through this alleyway. The site is surrounded by SAISD property, and the actual alleyway is home to a water and sewer line. Essentially nothing is being gained for the public's benefit for the City to be maintaining this alleyway as a public right-of-way. It would be the best use of the property for it to be abandoned and encompassed by the SAISD which owns property on both sides of the alleyway. As such, SAISD would effectively own the entire Block 32 of the Miles Addition. The only requirement is that an easement be maintained where the current alleyway runs to allow for access and maintenance of the existing water and sewer line currently running in this alleyway. Proposed Conditions 1. Reservation of a 20' open and unobstructed utility easement (where the alleyway currently runs) to access and maintain existing water utilities facilities. Attachments: excerpt from zoning map, highlighting subject property; aerial photo, highlighting subject property; and draft ordinance. Presentation: Jeff Hintz, Interim Senior Planner
- 77. AN ORDINANCE PROVIDINGFOR THE ABANDONMENT AND CLOSING OF THE FOLLOWING ALLEY, TO WIT: An approximately 20 foot wide x 495 foot long portion of alley running east to west, perpendicular to Martin Luther King Drive located in Block 32 of the Miles Addition in north-central San Angelo; AUTHORIZING THE CONVEYANCE THEREOF TO THE ABUTTING PROPERTY OWNERS; PROVIDING FOR THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF ABANDONMENT AND CONVEYANCE; AND PROVIDING FOR THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE AND DELIVER A QUIT CLAIM DEED TO THE ABUTTING PROPERTY OWNERS RE: abandonment of a public right-of-way being an approximately 20 foot wide x 495 foot long portion of alley running east to west, perpendicular to Martin Luther King Drive located in Block 32 of the Miles Addition WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of San Angelo, Texas, acting pursuant to law, deems it advisable to abandon and convey the hereinafter described tract of land to the abutting property owner and is of the opinion that said land is not needed for public use, and that same should be abandoned and quit claimed to the abutting property owner as hereinafter provided; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of San Angelo, Texas is of the opinion that the best interest and welfare of the public will be served by abandoning and conveying same to the abutting property owner, subject to conditions and restrictions contained herein; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO: 1. That the following described tract in the City of San Angelo, Tom Green County, Texas be and the same is hereby abandoned, vacated and closed insofar as the right, title and easement of the public are concerned; subject, however, to the conditions and restrictions hereinafter more fully set out: BEING the entire 20 foot width and approximately 495 foot length of right-of-way for a public alley running east to west, perpendicular to Martin Luther King Drive located in Block 32 of the Miles Addition in north-central San Angelo, which said alley is described more particularly as follows: BEGINNING at a point on southeast corner of the Miles Addition, Block 32, Lot 1 THENCE in a southerly direction a distance of approximately 20 feet to the northeast corner of the Miles Addition, Block 32, Lot 20; THENCE in an westerly direction a distance of approximately 495 feet; THENCE in an northerly direction a distance of 20 feet; THENCE in an easterly direction a distance of approximately 495 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING.
- 78. 2. That the abandonmentand conveyance provided for herein is made and accepted subject to all present zoning and deed restrictions, if the latter exist, and all existing easements, if any, whether apparent or non-apparent, aerial, surface, underground or otherwise. 3. That the abandonment and conveyance provided for herein shall extend only to the public right, title, easement and interest and shall be construed to extend only to the interest which the governing body for the City of San Angelo may legally and lawfully abandon and vacate. 4. That the Mayor of the City of San Angelo is hereby authorized to execute and deliver a quit claim deed conveying the above-described tract to the abutting property owner. 5. That the terms and conditions contained in this ordinance shall be binding upon Grantees and assigns. 6. That the Grantees shall pay all reasonable costs associated with procedures necessitated by the request to abandon this public right-of-way. 7. That a 20 foot open and unobstructed easement be reserved as a utility easement where the current alleyway currently runs. INTRODUCED on the 3rd day of December, 2013 and finally PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED ON this the 17th day of December, 2013. CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS ATTEST: by: ______________________________ by: ______________________________ Dwain Morrison, Mayor Alicia Ramirez, City Clerk Approved As To Content: Approved As To Form: _________________________ AJ Fawver, Planning Manager ________________________ Lysia H. Bowling, City Attorney
- 79. SAN ANGELO CONVENTION& VISITORS BUREAU 3rd Quarter Report July - September, 2013 1. Convention Activities …………………………..........……. 1 - 9 2. Financials …………………………………..........…………10 - 13 3. Marketing & Promotions..…………..........………………..14 - 19 4. Visitor Statistics …………………..........…................……20 - 24
- 81.
- 82.
- 83.
- 84.
- 85.
- 86.
- 87.
- 88.
- 89.
- 90.
- 91.
- 92.
- 93.
- 94.
- 95. Convention South BannerAd July, 2013 TEXAS MONTHLY July, 2013 15
- 96. These are afew of OUR FAVORITE THINGS September: Lily Fest * Archaeology Fair October: Art-Ober-Fest * ASU Homecoming Riverfest * Color Run 5K Roping Fiesta Texas Forts Tour Bike Ride Fort Concho NightTours & Halloween November: Chicken Farm Art Center Open House For these and other events contact: WWW.VISITSANANGELO.ORG 1-800-375-1206 16 2013 Fall Ad.indd 1 5/20/2013 2:24:34 PM
- 97. TEXAS MONTHLY June/July,2013 17
- 98.
- 99. Smith Travel Report ComparativeSeptember 2012/2013 Occ % 2013 San Angelo+ Abilene+ Midland+ Odessa+ Lubbock+ Kerrville+ Amarillo+ Wichita Falls+ Killeen+ Longview+ ADR 2012 74.1 52.3 59.5 64.7 66.7 48.0 62.2 47.0 51.5 47.8 2013 79.6 50.5 67.9 81.1 61.0 45.0 56.7 44.3 57.5 49.7 2012 115.25 74.53 145.93 130.71 94.39 75.37 69.52 68.95 67.81 67.38 82.20 73.93 144.90 137.00 83.84 74.91 67.66 65.48 68.72 67.36 Occ % 2013 San Angelo+ Abilene+ Midland+ Odessa+ Lubbock+ Kerrville+ Amarillo+ Wichita Falls+ Killeen+ Longview+ 2013 74.6 53.8 74.8 85.1 63.8 46.9 60.3 48.8 62.9 54.8 2013 85.45 38.95 86.87 84.52 62.95 36.18 43.23 32.41 34.90 32.18 2012 65.46 37.36 98.37 111.16 51.13 33.69 38.37 29.04 39.48 33.50 Occ -6.9 3.4 -12.3 -20.3 9.4 6.7 9.6 6.0 -10.4 -3.9 ADR 40.2 0.8 0.7 -4.6 12.6 0.6 2.7 5.3 -1.3 0.0 RevPAR 30.5 4.2 -11.7 -24.0 23.1 7.4 12.7 11.6 -11.6 -3.9 Room Rev Room Avail Room Sold 30.5 4.2 -3.5 -10.2 21.5 7.4 14.4 7.2 -12.0 -0.0 0.0 0.0 9.3 18.1 -1.3 0.0 1.6 -3.9 -0.4 4.0 -6.9 3.4 -4.2 -5.9 7.9 6.7 11.4 1.8 -10.8 -0.1 Year to Date - September 2013 vs September 2012 Percent Change from YTD 2012 RevPAR ADR 2012 77.1 56.4 60.3 68.5 67.4 51.9 63.4 51.3 58.7 54.0 Current Month - September 2013 vs September 2012 RevPAR Percent Change from September 2012 2012 100.57 75.04 145.37 134.35 83.03 76.94 70.87 67.58 68.43 66.54 77.83 73.99 124.03 121.37 77.04 76.09 69.51 65.50 69.42 65.42 2013 77.55 42.29 87.63 92.03 55.95 39.93 44.91 34.66 40.19 35.92 2012 58.10 39.81 92.76 103.25 49.12 35.66 41.91 31.97 43.65 35.84 Occ 3.3 4.7 -19.4 -19.5 5.7 10.7 5.1 5.1 -6.6 -1.4 ADR 29.2 1.4 17.2 10.7 7.8 1.1 2.0 3.2 -1.4 1.7 RevPAR 33.5 6.2 -5.5 -10.9 13.9 12.0 7.2 8.4 -7.9 0.2 Room Rev Room Avail Room Sold 33.5 6.2 2.6 0.0 11.3 12.0 10.6 4.5 -7.3 2.9 0.0 -0.1 8.6 12.2 -2.3 0.0 3.2 -3.6 0.7 2.7 3.3 4.7 -12.5 -9.6 3.3 10.7 8.4 1.3 -6.0 1.2 Participation Properties Rooms Census San Angelo+ Abilene+ Midland+ Odessa+ Lubbock+ Kerrville+ Amarillo+ Wichita Falls+ Killeen+ Longview+ 24 43 38 38 57 14 70 27 33 37 Sample 18 27 23 22 38 10 45 21 19 22 Census 1956 3361 3351 3133 5006 1092 6091 2238 2269 2531 Sample 1533 2255 2506 2289 3566 864 4467 1792 1591 1600 19
- 100. San Angelo VisitorCenter Statistics - 3rd Quarter 2013 Texas City San Antonio Midland Odessa Abilene Marble Falls Houston Austin Lubbock Fort Worth El Paso Poolville Dallas Big Spring Odem Schertz Waco Rio Vista Del Rio Friona Corpus Christi Comfort Paint Rock Wichita Falls Lipan Round Rock Buda New Braunfels Marion Livingston Waller Burnet Riomedina Ballinger Seminole Hutto Baytown Leander Harlingen Helotes Lytle Humble Bluff Dale Taylor Edinburg Midlothian # of visitors # of days stay 163 161 160 154 154 147 124 117 107 78 70 56 55 49 48 48 45 44 41 38 20 20 20 20 20 19 19 18 16 16 16 16 16 15 15 15 15 15 14 13 10 10 10 10 10 2 8 2 1 3 3 2 2 2 3 4 4 2 3 2 3 4 2 3 3 4 4 3 4 2 4 2 4 3 2 2 2 2 3 2 3 3 2 2 2 2 4 4 3 4 Texas City Carthage Bridgeport Boerne Pecos Kerrville Orange Grove Arlington Kingsland Cedar Park Brownwood Brownsville Killeen Amarillo Laredo Sonora Iowa Park Mansfield Brady Weatherford Lorena Aledo Mission Graford Stephenville Denver City Commerce Spring Addison Sweetwater Tomball Snyder Wimberley La Feria Lamesa Mason Early De Leon Crane Spring Branch Comstock Bangs China Spring Lewisville Tyler Cleburne # of visitors # of days stay 38 37 34 34 31 30 30 30 28 28 26 25 25 24 24 23 23 23 22 21 13 13 13 13 12 12 12 12 12 12 11 11 11 11 11 11 10 10 10 10 9 9 9 9 9 3 2 2 3 1 4 2 4 3 2 2 4 1 3 3 2 4 1 2 4 3 3 2 2 2 4 1 2 1 2 1 4 4 2 2 3 4 4 2 4 3 4 2 2 2 20
- 101. San Angelo VisitorCenter Statistics - 3rd Quarter 2013 Texas City Fredericksburg Atlanta Frisco Granbury Alice Winters Mertzon Castroville Caddo Mills Rochelle Round Mountain Carrizo Springs Canyon Seguin Big Lake Georgetown Pearland Fort Stockton Richmond Cameron Eldorado Hereford De Soto Deer Park Alpine Kingsville Liberty Hill Cibolo Junction Miles Texarkana Three Rivers Slaton Tolar Sandy San Elizario Ingram Adrian Hamilton Temple Carrollton Floresville Orange Llano Missouri City # of visitors # of days stay 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 9 9 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 2 3 2 2 4 3 1 4 4 3 4 4 4 2 1 1 4 2 3 4 2 2 4 3 2 5 2 2 2 2 4 3 3 3 2 3 1 1 4 2 5 30 3 1 3 Texas City Victoria Alamo Muleshoe Bastrop Harker Heights Bryan Andrews Euless Fabens Bronte Seagraves Yoakum Hawley Hebbronville San Benito Lyford Chico Athens Floydada Iraan Harper Katy Cedar Creek Pampa Mineral Wells Dripping Springs Mc Camey Bovina Haslet Ranger Dickinson Pittsburg Roscoe Lampasas Rowena Clyde Eastland Blanco Charlotte Colorado City Cisco Cross Plains Bedford Darrouzett Alvarado # of visitors # of days stay 9 9 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 5 5 5 5 5 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 2 4 2 3 3 4 1 3 2 1 3 4 4 4 3 4 2 4 4 3 2 4 4 2 2 1 4 3 2 2 4 4 1 2 1 2 1 2 4 1 2 3 2 2 3 21
- 102. San Angelo VisitorCenter Statistics - 3rd Quarter 2013 Texas City Salado Plano Belton Ozona Barnhart Borger Converse Farmersville Galveston College Station Moulton Stanton Lott Sugarland Rocksprings Van Alstyne Marshall Morton Nacogdoches League City Navasota Needville Waxahachie Newcastle Jacksonville Richardson Port Lavaca Huntsville Irving Portland Paige San Saba Alvin Uvalde Albert Angleton Lindale Levelland Zapata Barksdale Bandera Adkins Loop Bay City La Vernia # of visitors # of days stay 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 76 1 1 2 3 4 1 3 1 2 2 2 4 2 3 2 4 3 4 1 2 4 6 2 1 2 4 2 1 3 2 2 1 1 4 3 5 3 3 2 5 2 2 Texas City Dublin Greenville Granger Anson Balmorhea Gary Gouldbusk Arp Goldthwaite Decatur Pyote Colleyville McKinney Driftwood Sealy Springtown Coahoma Clifton El Paso Melissa Coleman Brenham Montgomery Midkiff Dimmitt Claude Caldwell Sheffield Coppell Progreso Cayuga Roanoke Chester Webster West Albany Whitney Afton Port Isabel Wylie Princeton Thrall Bellaire Stratford Beaumont # of visitors # of days stay 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 2 1 2 14 14 4 3 1 1 1 2 1 4 3 4 3 2 2 1 4 1 1 2 2 4 1 4 4 2 2 2 4 1 1 7 2 1 2 1 1 4 1 2 22
- 103. San Angelo VisitorCenter Statistics - 3rd Quarter 2013 Texas City Wallis Forney Yorktown Sterling City Refugio Van Horn Rockwall Wall Azle Buffalo Gap Burleson Rockdale Star Robert Lee Shallowater Vidor Tatum Edcouch Medina Diana Lopeno Dime Box Mineola Grandbury Grand Prairie La Coste Kennedale Copperas Cove Pilot Point Plains Daingerfield Plainview Jefferson Crawford Gilmer Baird Hewitt Holland Tahoka Terlingua Glen Rose Universal City Henderson Lexington Kemah # of visitors # of days stay 3 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 4 1 4 3 7 1 2 1 1 2 2 1 2 1 5 4 1 2 3 1 1 1 3 1 2 2 2 1 4 2 7 3 3 1 3 3 4 2 4 4 4 1 3 Texas City Tarpley Brackettville Breckenridge Santa Rosa Brookshire Gonzales Mesquite Denton Menard Devine Memphis Pleasanton Littlefield Falfurrias Marlin George West Manor Lohn Garland Little River Conroe Hurst Hawkins Hermleigh Mingus Whiteface Allen Weslaco Kirbyville Grapevine Lancaster Groves Wiergate Centerville Carlsbad Cypress Rice Rhome Cumby Evant Rankin Monahans Rainbow Cresson Parker # of visitors # of days stay 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 2 3 4 1 1 2 3 1 4 2 5 4 4 2 1 1 3 1 2 3 1 2 1 1 1 4 4 4 3 1 2 30 1 2 3 4 2 4 1 3 1 10 3 23
- 104. San Angelo VisitorCenter Statistics - 3rd Quarter 2013 Texas City Christoval Corinth Pasadena Olton Earth Lueders Manchaca Flower Mound Stamford Mc Allen Edna Canton Seabrook Robstown Sanderson Brownfield Dumas Royse City # of visitors # of days stay 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 4 1 4 4 2 1 4 3 1 1 1 4 2 1 1 3 Texas City Los Fresnos Port Aransas Rosenberg # of visitors # of days stay 1 1 1 4 1 1 TOTAL # Visits TOTAL # Visitors 1264 4169 TOTAL Visitors International and States 4992 TOP 3 Countries Top 3 States Mexico Oklahoma Canada California Germany New Mexico 24
- 105. SAN ANGELO CONVENTION& VISITORS BUREAU 4th Quarter Report October - December, 2013 1. Convention Activities - 3rd/4th Quarter Cumulative .......... 1 2. Convention Activities …………………………..........……. 2 - 6 3. Financials …………………………………..........………… 7 - 10 4. Marketing & Promotions..…………..........……………….. 11 - 14
- 107.
- 108.
- 109.
- 110.
- 111.
- 112.
- 113.
- 114.
- 115.
- 116.
- 117. TEXAS MONTHLY DECEMBER, 20131/3 PG MIDWEST LIVING JANUARY 2014 1/3 pg 11
- 118.
- 119. TEXAS HIGHWAYS DECEMBER, 20131/3 pg AAA SOUTHERN TRAVELER JAN-FEB, 2014 13
- 120.
- 126. City of San Angelo Memo MeetingDate: December 17, 2013 To: Mayor & City Council members From: AJ Fawver, Interim Director of Development Services Subject: Discussion of handling existing parks Contacts: AJ Fawver, Interim Director of Development Services 657-4210 Caption: DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING STRATEGIES FOR OBTAINING COMPLIANCE WITH ZONING ORDINANCE FOR EXISTING PARKS AROUND SAN ANGELO CONTAINING RECREATIONAL VEHICLES, MANUFACTURED HOUSING, AND MOBILE HOMES Summary: In response to the continuing discussions of recreational vehicles (RVs), mobile homes, and manufactured homes, and in the interest of developing an enforcement strategy to deal with an influx in these structures as a result of the Cline Shale play, City staff researched every existing "park" within the city limits. As part of this research, they looked at the following characteristics of each: • • • • • acreage; approximate number of existing spaces; approximate number of structures and their classifications; how the park came to exist, from a regulatory standpoint; and strategies to bring all parks into compliance under a singular approach.
- 127. Breakdown of ExistingParks There appear to be 18 parks currently in existence within the city limits & the surrounding ETJ. Of these 18, 2 carry the zoning classification of MHP (Manufactured Housing Park), an existing zoning district provided for within the Zoning Ordinance, adopted in 2000. (The next section addresses what MHP zoning allows and its associated requirements.) Of the remaining 16 parks, 2 lie within approved Planned Development (PD) districts. 1 park was in existence prior to the adoption of the first Zoning Ordinance in 1954, and 2 were in existence prior to their annexation into the city, meaning that these three are legally nonconforming. 4 of those 16 have an approved special permit in place allowing specifically "mobile homes", not RVs. 3 are outside the city limits, in the ETJ, and the remaining 3 have long existed, though staff could not locate any approvals or explanation as how they came to be allowed in the first place. The MHP Zoning District The MHP Zoning District is: "intended to provide opportunities for development of land with improvements and utilities specifically for the accommodation of manufactured housing in projects under unified management and control. These parks may include other services and common facilities for use by the residents. Any MHP district may include more than one manufactured housing park as long as each park within the district is under unified management and control." Section 310.E of the Zoning Ordinance allows the following uses within MHP zoning: • Household Living - by right; • Parks & Open Areas - by right; • Community Services - as a Conditional Use; • Telecommunications Facilities - as a Conditional Use; • Golf Courses - as a Special Use; • Campground/Recreational Vehicle Parks - as a Special Use. The only building types allowed in MHP zoning are manufactured homes and mobile homes. The minimum land area required is three acres, with a maximum density of 8 dwelling units per acre. There are required setback standards between dwellings (10 feet), a dwelling and buildings serving the entire park (15 feet), a dwelling and the edge of pavement (10 feet), and a dwelling and the park boundary (20 feet). Two parking spaces are required for each dwelling, as is skirting. Dwellings may be no further than 500 feet away from a fire hydrant, and a site plan approval is required for any new development. Mobile homes are also allowed for placement within MHP zones, subject to these same aforementioned conditions. Recreational vehicles are also allowed for placement - for permanent living - within this zoning district. There is, however, a limit to the number of RV units which can be placed within these, outlined in Section 413.C.3: "3. Exceptions Travel trailers, motorized recreational vehicles and other such relocatable housing that does not meet the definition of either a "mobile home" or of "manufactured housing" may be occupied within a manufactured housing park, provided these types of accommodations do not exceed 30 percent of the total units in the park."
- 128. Possible Approach forCompliance In order to create equity and a consistent set of standards for these parks currently in existence - staff examined mechanisms already provided for within the current ordinance. It is clear that there are compliance issues - with the existing special permit ordinances, which allow specifically for mobile home placement only; with the movement of additional RV units into parks which do not carry with them an allowance for 30% RV placement; and, with the difficulty of enforcing regulations which vary from park to park. As such, staff attempted to find a way to streamline the regulations for all parks, while allowing for some RV placement within the boundaries of these parks as they exist - directly addressing any demand for such. While the current ordinance does address "campground/RV parks", it does not address them for the purposes of living quarters. Special permits are long-defunct mechanisms for which a process no longer exists. However, MHP zoning currently provided for in the ordinance allows placement of all three types of structures. Therefore, it appears the obvious possibility is to ask the City Council to consider initiation of a rezoning of all existing parks to MHP zoning. This approach would bring equity to the requirements for the parks, while limiting the placement of RVs to a minority of the parks - which appears to directly respond to some of the concerns raised about RVs moving into the city. It would also legitimize parks for which no documentation can be produced about the initial approval for their placement. This solution is not without some difficulties, however, based on the following facts: • 3 of the 15 parks within the current city limits have acreage smaller than the minimum three acres, and would be in violation of this provision. • Remember that MHP zoning, as discussed on the previous page, only allows for 30% of the total number of units to be RVs. With this current standard, 5 of the existing parks would be in violation. • Also, remember that MHP zoning only allows for a maximum of 8 units per acre. There are 3 parks which already have more units than the maximum density requirement would allow. On a side note: the Zoning Board of Adjustment, a board who follows criteria outlined in state law, hears request for variances, or deviations from the minimum numerical standards. Variance requests are evaluated from a perspective of uniqueness and equity, among other factors. Also, if the number of manufactured housing units within a park increased, the 30% threshold would increase with it. Lastly, these standards may be a consideration of the housing committee and decision-making bodies moving forward as they examine the rules currently in place. Question for Council consideration City staff is looking to the Council for guidance as to how to proceed with enforcement of regulations, while recognizing the "patchwork" of different approval types - or lack thereof which led to the parks in existence today is a complicating factor.
- 129. Attachments: Reviewed by: N/A AJ Fawver,Interim Director of Development Services
- 130. City of SanAngelo Memo Meeting Date: December 17, 2013 To: Mayor and City Council members From: AJ Fawver, Interim Director of Development Services Subject: Permission to execute contract, with terms previously agreed upon by Council, with top ranked consulting group in response to PL-01-12 Contacts: AJ Fawver, Interim Director of Development Services 657-4210 Captions: DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACCEPTANCE OF DOWNTOWN MASTER DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIES DOCUMENT PREPARED BY CATALYST URBAN DEVELOPMENT AS PART OF CED 05-11 Summary: The final document prepared by Catalyst Urban Development as part of their contract with the City of San Angelo, is being presented for acceptance by the City Council. This is Task 1.9 of Phase 1 of the project and will close out this contract. Secondly, as per the contract, Catalyst cannot proceed into Phase 2 without approval from the City Council. As such, staff is also seeking direction from Council regarding proceeding into Phase 2. Background: Discussion & Possible Acceptance Item: In a joint session with the Downtown Development Commission on December 18, 2012, the members from both bodies heard a presentation by Paris Rutherford with Catalyst Urban Development and held discussion, after which the Council formally
- 131. accepted the DDC'srecommendation to approve the proposed scope, the Letter of Intent (with the understanding that staff will present each Phase [1-4] for City Council's review and approval for further direction), and authorized staff to negotiate a contract with the terms from the earlier presentation, and to include the identification of funding sources. Catalyst Urban Development revised the Letter of Intent to include the approval between each phase by the City Council. They also submitted a draft contract, which has been reviewed, amended, discussed, and approved by the City Attorney's office, and which is attached to this report. Conference calls and meetings were held between various City staff and Catalyst to work through insurance requirements, contract structuring, and other related matters. The finished product, including land analysis, market-based programming, policy context, ownership evaluation, project/location prioritization, implementation timetable(s), project packaging, and identification of potential investors/developers has led to - and is contained within - the attached draft document entitled "Downtown Master Development Strategies". Acceptance of this document is the goal behind the first agenda caption item. Related Vision Item: Provide adequate amenities for all neighborhoods. Attract reinvestment. Develop strategic plan for recruitment. Examine liquidation of underutilized City properties. Financial Impact: The approved Phase I costs were for $68,000, plus reimbursable expenses capped at $22,000. $66,000 of the $68,000 has been paid out, while $7200 of the $22,000 in reimbursable expenses has been paid out. Attachments: Letter of Intent dated December 18, 2012 City Council minute record from December 18, 2012 City Council minute record from May 21, 2013 Draft of "Downtown Master Development Strategies" document Presentation: AJ Fawver, Interim Director of Development Services
- 132. CATALYST DEVELOPMENT December 2, 2012 RevisedDecember 18, 2012 AJ Fawver, AICP Planning Manager City of San Angelo 52 W. College Avenue San Angelo, Texas 76903 Re: Downtown Redevelopment – Letter of Intent Dear Ms. Fawver: Catalyst Urban Development is ready to assist the City of San Angelo in its efforts to induce coordinated redevelopment in its Downtown. Based on our response to the Downtown Development Commission’s (DDC) Request for Proposals, we have prepared the following Letter of Intent (LOI) outlining the steps we believe are necessary to arrive at such projects. We look forward to discussing this LOI at the December 18th joint work session with the City Council and DDC. SCOPE OF SERVICES Phase 1: Implementation Action Plan Task 1.1: Investment/Horizontal Land Analysis Catalyst will undertake an analysis of the downtown zone to determine opportunity sites for new development. Based on Tom Green County Appraisal District data, this will include the analysis of current assessed values, vacant land, public lands, areas of declining tax base, etc. This analysis will take the form of GIS mapping to determine specific land/block/parcel groupings showing redevelopment promise. These findings will be further refined through our on-site review and determinations. Task 1.2: Market-Based Programming Catalyst will prepare an opportunities study that identifies market trends in demographics, demand, land use, capital market preferences, funding sources and uses, and practical implementation concerns. This analysis will generate a specific redevelopment program concept for a range of specific project types. It is assumed that such efforts will be done in coordination with key stakeholders in one public meeting. Task 1.3: Policy Context The Catalyst Team will consolidate the recommendations from the City’s current downtown plan (as part of its comprehensive plan update), current TIF and other incentive program potential, existing downtown zoning and development restrictions, and other policy goals gleaned from discussion with City Staff and stakeholders in prior meeting. This context will be compared to the results of Tasks 1.1 and 1.2 to begin to refine down to a specific target project list based on desired land use and location. Task 1.4: Ownership Evaluation Catalyst will meet with specific property owners for land/block/parcel groupings identified in the previous tasks to determine their goals, pricing, etc for use in the project prioritization process below. It is anticipated these meetings will occur during a one day worksession, in separate individual meetings. Task 1.5: Project and Location Prioritization Catalyst will identify the results of all tasks prepared to date to build a prioritized project list for discussion with the City. Prioritization is often associated with a project’s probability of implementation, its ability to Catalyst Urban Development, LLC I 25 Highland Park Village, Suite 100-280 I Dallas, Texas 75205 Tel 214-796-6063 I www.catalysturban.com
- 133. City of SanAngelo December 2, 2012 generate critical mass, strength of its location, and its ability to entice the market. Catalyst will present its analysis of all identified project sites to the City. This purpose will be to prioritize the projects and identify an initial phasing. Task 1.6: Implementation Timetable Catalyst will create an implementation timetable to advance the prioritized projects. Timetables will include short-term (i.e. 12 months), mid-term (2-4 years) and long-term (5-10 years) efforts. Task 1.7: Project Packaging Based on the results of the refined programming and prioritization, Catalyst will assemble supporting market data, project programming, physical planning, artist rendering, pricing, financial analysis, identified sources and uses of funds, incentive programs and related public/private partnership structures (if needed), and other information for 3 prioritized projects. This information will be assembled in project packages for use in marketing discussion in phase two upon City approval to do so. Task 1.8: Identify Potential Project Investors and Developers Catalyst will identify potential investment and developer prospects. In addition, and depending on the projects identified, Catalyst, NE Development and Construction, and related entities will analyze these projects as a potential vertical developer/investor itself; but this process does not guarantee Catalyst will commit to executing such a development. Task 1.9: City Approval Catalyst will present the full results of all phase one tasks to the City for review and final approval to advance to phase two. Phase 2: Horizontal Development Positioning Catalyst will not proceed into this phase without prior approval from City. Task 2.1: Developer/Investor Discussions Once the results of the phase one tasks are approved by the City, Catalyst will reach out to the developer/investor prospects identified in phase one to attempt to secure their interest. This process will also determine the Catalyst team member’s desire to move forward as vertical developers. Task 2.2: Horizontal Funding Strategy Depending on the requirements of the prioritized projects, Catalyst will help identify and position available special finance tools to gain property control and fund horizontal improvements as appropriate. Task 2.3: Zoning Consistent with prioritized projects, Catalyst will work with the City and property owners in a coordinated effort to seek necessary zoning for these projects. Task 2.4: Property Assembly Should the City be required to acquire certain properties or facilitate acquisition by third-parties, Catalyst will coordinate this process. Task 2.5: Market Outreach Based on the City’s approval gained in phase 1 and the completion of the work items listed above, Catalyst will coordinate the market roll-out for these projects. Catalyst Urban Development, LLC I 25 Highland Park Village, Suite 100-280 I Dallas, Texas 75205 Tel 214-796-6063 I www.catalysturban.com
- 134. City of SanAngelo December 2, 2012 Task 2.6: Marketing Team To facilitate this outreach, Catalyst will coordinate and help the City select a brokerage firm that will to prepare marketing and public relations strategy for these projects. It is anticipated this team would include both national/regional and local entities (JLL, CBRE, Grubb & Ellis, Dierchske & Dierschke, Scott Allison Realtors, etc). Phase 3: Vertical Development Positioning Catalyst will not proceed into this phase without prior approval from City. Once the Implementation Action Plan is approved by the City and the work associated with Phase 2 is completed or well underway, the Catalyst team will undertake the following work efforts for specific projects that a third-party developer or the Catalyst team desires to vertically execute. Should our team become the developer/investor, the City may utilize a non-interested party to undertake some of the work defined below. • Financial Analysis -- Catalyst will prepare a refined financial analysis based on further developer input for City’s more detailed understanding. This analysis will be performed with emphasis on any economic gap requiring a public/private partnership. • Public/Private Partnership -- As third party developers/investors become interested, and if such (initial) focus projects require public/private partnerships to properly implement, Catalyst will work with the city attorney in its drafting of public/private partnership agreements. • Pricing of Public Improvements -- Catalyst would work with civil engineer and landscape architects on the conceptual design of necessary public improvements associated with each focus project that has gained market interest (if such improvements are the responsibility of the City in the public/private partnership proposed), and would work with site contractors to obtain related pricing to help define or verify the pricing proposed by each third-party developer/investor. • Bond Strategy -- Should the sale of bonds be necessary to implement the identified projects, Catalyst will assist the City in its definition of the improvements/projects associated with such a sale. Catalyst will work with the City’s attorney and bond sales agent in its formal processing of such efforts. • Development Agreements -- If identified third-party developer/investor is interested in moving forward, Catalyst will assist the City in its negotiation/finalization of related development agreements. Catalyst will work with the City’s attorney in all related drafting of such agreements. Phase 4: Construction Management / Project Oversight Catalyst will not proceed into this phase without prior approval from City. Once vertical development project(s) are approved by the City, Catalyst will undertake actions aimed at helping guide the implementation of horizontal improvements (public improvements, master infrastructure, etc) necessary to the vertical development(s) as defined by the Public Private Partnership. This will include such efforts as the following: • Master Infrastructure Design -- Catalyst would facilitate the engagement of civil engineers and landscape architects necessary to design and engineer construction drawings for the necessary master infrastructural improvements (public and/or private) associated with specific advancing developments. Catalyst Urban Development, LLC I 25 Highland Park Village, Suite 100-280 I Dallas, Texas 75205 Tel 214-796-6063 I www.catalysturban.com
- 135. City of SanAngelo December 2, 2012 • Refined Pricing Analysis – Based on this design process, Catalyst would refine the preliminary pricing of such improvements (as performed in Phase 1), based on detailed construction drawings. • Bidding and Contract Negotiation – Catalyst would coordinate the bidding of the master horizontal improvements and assist the City in its evaluation, selection, and contract negotiation of a contractor to complete the public improvements. • Public Approvals and Permitting – Catalyst would coordinate the public approvals and permitting of the public improvements. • Utility Provider Negotiation and Contracts – Catalyst would coordinate and negotiate utility provider improvements and agreements. • Construction Management – Catalyst would assist the city in the oversight of the construction contract with the general contractor for the master infrastructure, reporting such progress to the City as it progresses. Compensation Catalyst proposes to execute the work outlined in this letter of intent through the specific compensation format as outlined below. This compensation is exclusive to Catalyst; fees for outside groups and services (additional planners, attorneys, designers, reproduction houses, travel, etc) would be reimbursable expenses as approved separately by the City if deemed necessary. • Phase One – Catalyst proposes to complete this work for a lump sum amount of $68,000, excluding reimbursable expenses. We estimate there may be an additional $12,000 to $22,000 for outside groups as approved by the City to include attorneys, civil engineers, etc. Whether these are necessary will be determined in the initial tasks. • Phase Two -- Upon approval from City of San Angelo, Catalyst will progress into the second phase. To complete these tasks, Catalyst would receive $10,000 per month until project-related development agreement(s) are executed. It is anticipated that this will occur with a 6 month time period. If the City chooses to acquire property, Catalyst would be entitled a fee of 3% the purchase price as City’s consultant. • Phase Three -- Should the Catalyst team desire to become a developer/investor, fees for Phase Three efforts would be part of a negotiated public/private partnership or development agreement. If Catalyst engages on City’s behalf with a third-party developer/investor to further induce implementation through the tasks identified in phase three, Catalyst would provide a fee proposal for such work at the time such work and developer/investor is further defined. • Phase Four Fee -- Should the Catalyst team desire to become a developer/investor, fees for Phase Four efforts would be part of a negotiated public/private partnership or development agreement. If Catalyst engages on City’s behalf with a third-party developer/investor, or simply on the City’s behalf for a nonproject-related public improvement, Catalyst would be entitled to a fee of 1.5% the total value of improvements for the work outlined in Task 4 for which Catalyst would provide oversight. This amount would be part of the overall improvement budget and would be paid in equal monthly installments during the life of the construction period for said improvements. Catalyst Urban Development, LLC I 25 Highland Park Village, Suite 100-280 I Dallas, Texas 75205 Tel 214-796-6063 I www.catalysturban.com
- 136. City of SanAngelo December 2, 2012 • Other On-Going Tasks -- While the work described in this letter should constitute the primary work effort necessary to gain the market awareness necessary to urge implementation, there may be other tasks that arise out of this process that are not included here. Compensation for such tasks will be analyzed on a case-by-case basis for the City’s approval. Contracts If the concepts and compensation outlined in this Letter of Intent are deemed acceptable and ready to be placed within a more detailed master development services contract, please acknowledge such acceptance by executing this Letter of Intent below. Such execution does not commit the City of San Angelo to enter such a relationship; it simply acknowledges the concepts, scope and compensation presented. If acceptable, the City and Catalyst would work to place these terms in a detailed master development services contract outlining the related detailed business terms acceptable to both parties. Catalyst is excited to offer this Letter of Intent to the City of San Angelo as we believe these efforts will assist the City move closer to the realization of its redevelopment goals for Downtown. As such, we look forward to your response. Sincerely, CATALYST URBAN DEVELOPMENT, LLC Paris M. Rutherford IV Principal Cc: Rhys Heinsch -- Catalyst Catalyst Urban Development, LLC I 25 Highland Park Village, Suite 100-280 I Dallas, Texas 75205 Tel 214-796-6063 I www.catalysturban.com
- 140. Downtown Master DevelopmentStrategies San Angelo,Texas MASTER DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIES City of San Angelo,Texas - San Angelo Downtown Development Commission - Catalyst Urban Development
- 141. Executive Summary 1 Summary ofEconomic Drivers Energy Sector Goodfellow Airforce Base Angelo State University 2 3 4 5 Trade Area Analysis Introductions to Trade Area Analysis Population Statistics Household Statistics Employment and Projections Employers 6 7 8 9 14 15 Land Use Programming Office Analysis Restaurant Analysis Housing Analysis Programming Summary 16 17 18 21 22 Physical and Policy Analysis Physical Area Opportunities Analysis Downtown Infrastructure Ownership Type Analysis Land Assembly Analysis Assessed Value Analysis Tax Generation Analysis Local Regulations Ease of Development Subdistrict Identities Historic Sites Impacting Features Opportunity Sites Existing Policy Comprehensive Plan Update 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 Redevelopment Program Downtown Redevelopment Investment Concept 1: Restaurant Infill Restaurant Infill Zone Parcels Investment Concept 2: Workplace Infill Worplace Infill Concept - Shannon Medical Center District Investment Concept 3: Residential Infill Residential Infill Zone - Concho Riverfront Economic Development Tools 38 39 42 43 46 47 Conclusions 58 Table of Contents 51 52 57 Sources • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • City of San Angelo Downtown Commission San Angelo Chamber of Commerce San Angelo Comprehensive Plan American Community Survey Census Bureau EASI ESRI Basemaps ESRI Business Analyst Texas Workforce Commission Texas Railroad Commission Texas Tech University Systems Angelo State Centennial Study Goodfellow Airforce Base Google Earth www.theclineshale.com www.investmentu.com Catalyst Urban Development i
- 142. San Angelo CityCouncil Acknowledgements Dwain Morrison - Mayor Rodney Fleming - District 1 Marty Self - District 2 Johnny Silvas - District 3 Don Verderman - District 4 H.R. Winkie Wardlaw - District 5 Charlotte Farmer - District 6 San Angelo Downtown Development Commission Jim Cummings Lisa Eady Tim Edwards John Fuentes Sharon Rainey Alexander Gary Cox Jim Raymond San Angelo City Staff Daniel Valenzuela - City Manager Michael Dane - Assistant City Manager / CFO Rick Weise - Assistant City Manager Becky Dunn - Executive Office Coordinator A.J. Fawver - Interim Director of Development Services Jeff Hintz - Interim Senior Planner Kevin Boyd - Planner Roxanne Johnston - Planner Mike Smith - GIS Manager Aaron Abilez - Senior GIS Analyst Morgan Kuhn - GIS Analyst Daniela Curl - GIS Technician Catalyst Urban Development - Project Manager ii
- 143. Executive Summary Introduction Demand Potential Throughits Downtown Development Commission, the City of San Angelo is pursuing efforts to identify new investment opportunities within its Downtown core. To assist this effort, Catalyst Urban Development was engaged by the City to identify specific master development strategies and new investment project opportunities within the Downtown study area. This area is generally defined by Highway 67 to the north, the Concho River to the west, Washington Drive to the south, the Arts and Historic District to the southeast, and Main Street to the east. The primary economic drivers effecting investment in the San Angelo marketplace include regional activities in the energy sector, growth and employment in the insti- Summary Notes: tutional sector that includes Angelo State University and area health care providers, and Goodfellow Air Force Base. • Primary Economic Drivers: Goodfellow Air Force Base, Angelo These economic anchors allow San Angelo to have a more State University, and the energy stable economy than West Texas communities that are industry. primarily dependent on energy sector employment, and provide specific opportunities that can be applied to new investment in San Angelo’s downtown. When measuring • Downtown trade area includes the full city limits of San Angelo. the economic growth anticipated for the defined trade area over the next ten years, and incorporating the unique out-of-market potential provided by San Angelo’s primary • Primary demand potential has been measured to include: economic drivers, land use demand has been calculated for the downtown study area that includes demand for over - 600+ Residential Units 600 multifamily units across multiple residential densities, - 6 New Restaurants 6 new restaurants, and over 220,000 sf of new office space - 220,000+ sf of Office Space in various tenant configurations. Market Development and Programming Analysis The base demographics that effect investment in the downtown real estate trade area and related market-based land use programming opportunities have been collected for presentation in this report. The trade area defined for these measurements includes the entire city limits of San Angelo and other immediate areas.These demographics were measured through the study of available data sources including the US Census Bureau’s American Community Survey (ACS), Texas Department of Labor and Statistics, Texas Railroad Commission, Concho Valley Appraisal District, EASI, ESRI, and the City of San Angelo. Real estate programming potential was measured by converting industry standard forecasted growth analysis for the targeted trade area to the range of real estate investment categories including office, retail, restaurant, and housing. Map Sources: ESRI, City of San Angelo, Catalyst 1
- 144. Summary of EconomicDrivers Downtown San Angelo San Angelo 2
- 145. Energy Sector Potential Withthe discovery and current exploration of the potential associated with regional shale formations, it appears San Angelo is well positioned for stable growth over the next development cycle. While little information currently exists on the employment prospects associated with shale formations in the area, industry experts have indicated that the Cline, Spraberry, and Wolfberry shale fields may hold 20 to 30 billion barrels of recordable oil. This potential production is comparable to the Eagle Ford shale in southern Texas and we have therefore used it as a comparable to analyze such employment potential. Comparable Shale Field Analysis Eagle Ford shale formation has generated expanded oil and gas production in the last few years that has greatly enhanced local economies and employment. In 2012 alone, these activities generated roughly $1 billion in revenue to local municipal governments and $1.2 billion to the State of Texas. The Eagle Ford Shale formation is estimated to contain 10 billion barrels of recoverable oil, in addition to significant natural gas deposits. This is less than half of the estimated oil and gas deposits in the Cline shale. Permitting associated with oil production in the Eagle Ford shale formation have increased from .61 permits / day to over 8.48 permits / day since 2009. Similarly, permits associated with the Cline shale have risen from .62 permits per / day to 5.48 permits / day over the same period. This expansion in permitting indicates a measurable increase in employment Like San Angelo, the City of Victoria benefits from its proximity to the shale formation and has experienced an employment growth rate of 2.18% for the previous three years. For the purposes of determining employment potential and accounting for the volatility inherent in the energy sector, the projects for San Angelo include a 50% reduction to Victoria’s 2.18% employment growth rate. Energy Sector Summary of Potential: • Eagle Ford Shale field studied as comparable economic driver. • Cline shale field estimated to drive economic development throughout the 10 year programming period. • This analysis indicates the poten- tial for over 5,000 jobs during the next 10 years. Cline Shale Potential With oil prices being over $100/barrel, the economics to extract oil from the Cline shale are profitable according to energy sector sources. This is anticipated to spark employment growth proportionally consistent with that associated with the Eagle Ford formation. Map & Text Sources:Texas Workforce Commission, ESRI, City of San Angelo, UTSA, Catalyst, www.theclineshale.com, www.investmentu.com 3
- 146. Background Goodfellow Air ForceBase, a joint service base, in San Angelo is a major training facility for the United States Air Force. Over 9,000 students are trained in all services at the facility per year, and at any given time the base has over 5,000 military, 800 civil service, and 12,000 family members at the base. The Air Force Base, according to the San Angelo Chamber of Commerce, currently employs 5,165 employees, and has an annual impact on the city between 17,000 to 26,000 people annually. Goodfellow Air Force Base The Army’s 344th Military Intelligence Battalion is headquartered at the base, and along with the rest of the base, has a significant housing impact on the community. Summary of Potential: There are 3,307 on base dormitory beds, and 241 dwelling units (single family homes, duplex homes, and four-plex homes) on campus. • Nine thousand students trained every year. • At any given point over 5,000 mili- The base estimates an impact of 3,000 to 7,000 off campus units. The top-tier of this demand can be shifted to properly positioned residential demand downtown tary personnel, 800 civil service personnel, and 12,000 family members are stationed at the base. • 5,165 employees currently work at the base. • 3,307 on campus dormitory beds. • 241 total dwelling units - 25 Single Family Homes - 96 Duplex Homes - 120 Four-plex Homes • An annual off-campus estimate of 3,000 to 7,000 units. • Goodfellow Air Force Base has an annual impact on 17,000 to 26,000 people in the community. Sources: Goodfellow Air Force Base Home Page, Google Earth, Catalyst 4
- 147. Background Angelo State University,a part of the Texas Tech University System, has an estimated economic development impact of $223 million for Tom Green County. The Angelo State University Centennial 2020 plan specifies Texas Tech University, and Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board (THECB), and the Texas Tech Report, projections. Each indicates strong enrollment increases for the university by 2020. The THECB reports have enrollment set to increase to 8,500, and the Texas Tech Report has a target of 10,000 enrolled students.This is with the backdrop of 1.2% growth over the last nine years. The ratio of university related jobs per additional student is approximately 2:1.Therefore, 1,556 new jobs will be added if student enrollment increases to 10,000; and 806 new jobs if enrollment increases to 8,500. Angelo State University As shown in the table below, depending on the projections used, there will be demand for 960 to 1,854 beds. Two recent and popular student housing developments, “The Grove” and “Angelo Place” have 2, 3, and 4 bedroom units, and an average of 3.14 beds per unit indicates an additional need for 360 to 590 total units by 2020. • Angelo State University has an Student Housing Needs Current Student body (2012) Freshman Sophmores Juniors Seniors Graduates Texas Tech Universities Report 2020 Projections THECB 2020 Projections 6,888 34 20 16 22 8 10,000 8,500 Angelo State University On-Campus Housing Goals Freshman Sophmores Juniors Seniors / Graduates Projected Growth (students) Freshman Sophmores Juniors Seniors Graduates Off-Campus Student Apartment Needs (students) Freshman Sophmores Juniors Seniors / Graduates Total Off-Campus Needs by 2020 (beds) Total Units (3.14 beds/unit) 70 70 7 5 students % % % % % students students Summary of Potential: economic development impact of $223 million for Tom Green County. • Reports indicate the University will increase it’s enrollment from 6,888 students to 8,500 to 10,000 students. • This increase in students creates a demand for 960 to 1,854 off campus beds, or 306 to 590 new 2, 3, and 4 bedroom units. • The increased enrollment will cre- % % % % ate between 806 to 1,556 new jobs for the area. ASU / TTU 3,112 1,058 622 498 685 249 THECB 1,612 548 322 258 355 129 317 187 463 887 164 97 240 459 1,854 590 • An enrollment increase to 10,000 960 306 Sources: Leading The Way 2020: Texas Tech University System Strategic Priorities and Goals, ASU Centennial Master Plan students will have an additional economic development impact on Tom Green County of $169 million. 5
- 148. Trade Area Analysis DowntownSan Angelo Structured (20+) Garden Apts (5-19) 60.0% Other 50.0% 40.0% 30.0% Single Family 20.0% 10.0% DuplexQuadplex (2-4) Population Percentage Householder Percentage 0.0% Millenials 15 to 34 6 35 to 64 65 and Up
- 149. Trade Area Traditionally, landuse programming is calculated through the measurement of demographics within a 10-minute drive time of a particular site area. As Downtown San Angelo, and the City of San Angelo itself is a regional center within the West Texas community, a broader trade area designation is appropriate. As such, the city limits of San Angelo have been designated as the trade area boundary for all land uses except restaurants, which have been given a trade area boundary defined by a 15-minute drive time for larger market catchment. Sources: ESRI, City of San Angelo, ,Catalyst Introduction to Trade Area 7
- 150. American Community Survey5 year estimates (20072011), measured the population of San Angelo as 92,334. 51.3% of the population is female, and 48.7% is male. Breaking down the population groups into generation groups, the largest population group is the Millennial generation at 33.0%, followed by Generation X at 23.0%. Population Totals Male Female Total population 44,960 47,374 92,334 48.7% 51.3% Under 5 years 5 to 9 years 10 to 14 years 15 to 19 years 20 to 24 years 25 to 34 years 35 to 44 years 45 to 54 years 55 to 59 years 60 to 64 years 65 to 74 years 75 to 84 years 85 years and over Total population 6,769 6,315 5,171 7,959 9,494 12,999 9,811 11,394 5,301 4,482 6,348 4,732 1,559 92,334 7.3% 6.8% 5.6% 8.6% 10.3% 14.1% 10.6% 12.3% 5.7% 4.9% 6.9% 5.1% 1.7% This reflects the economic drivers in the area, specifically the education system and Angelo State University. The population is generally young, with Baby Boomers and the Silent Generation only making up 10.6% and 13.7% of the population. Population Statistics As a percentage of households, the Millennial generation is under represented, while Generation X, the Baby Boomers, and the Silent Generation make up the majority of householders. • 92,334 total population in San Summary Notes: Angelo. • 51.3% female; 48.7% male. • Generation breakdowns Population Groups Total Percentage Under 15 18,255 19.8% 15 to 34 30,452 33.0% 35 to 64 30,988 33.6% 65 and Up 12,639 13.7% All Groups 92,334 100.0% Householders 15 to 34 35 to 64 65 and Up All Householders Millennial - 33.0% Generation X - 23.0% Baby Boomers - 10.6% Silent Generation 13.7% • As a percentage of householders, the Millennial generation is under represented. Total Percentage 9,480 26.9% 17,327 49.1% 8,482 24.0% 35,289 100.0% 60.0% 50.0% 40.0% 30.0% Generation Millennials Gen X Baby Boomers Silent Generation Population Percentage 30,452 33.0% 21,205 23.0% 9,783 10.6% 12,639 13.7% 20.0% 10.0% Population Percentage Householder Percentage 0.0% 15 to 34 35 to 64 65 and Up Sources: 2011 ACS 5 yr estimate, Catalyst 8
- 151. American Community Survey5 year estimates (20072011), measured 39,458 total households. 4,169, or 10.6% of these households are vacant, therefore 35,289 are occupied households. Vacancy percentages are close to 20% for the multifamily units, and less than 10% for the single family residences. Renters occupy 36.6% of the housing market, approaching 100% renter occupancy rates in the higher density products. The majority of owner occupied households are in the single family market. Single family households make up nearly 75% of that total household market, with nearly 30,000 units. Townhomes are the second highest housing type with less than 10% of the total volume of single family households. Households Statistics and Units per Structure Summary Notes: • 39,458 total household units. • 10.6% vacancy across all household types. Medium Density MF (2049) Low Density MF (10-19) • Approximate 75% of the house- High Density MF (50+) Other hold market is single family households. Townhomes (5-9) • 36.6% of the housing market DuplexQuadpl ex (2-4) is renter occupied. • Nearly 100% of multi family units Single Family are renter occupied. • The majority of single family households are owner occupied. 2011 City of San Angelo Housing (Units / Structure) Single Family Duplex-Quadplex (2-4) Townhomes (5-9) Low Density MF (10-19) Medium Density MF (20-49) High Density MF (50+) Other All Units Total 29,528 1,151 2,591 2,037 870 2,029 1,252 39,458 Occupied 27,097 930 2,322 1,631 701 1,635 973 35,289 Vacant Vacancy % 2,431 8.2% 221 19.2% 269 10.4% 406 19.9% 169 19.4% 394 19.4% 279 22.3% 4,169 10.6% Owner Renter Renter Occupied Occupied Occupied % 21,569 5,528 20.4% 65 865 93.0% 15 2,307 99.4% 73 1,558 95.5% 11 690 98.4% 57 1,578 96.5% 577 396 40.7% 22,367 12,922 36.6% Sources: 2011 ACS 5 yr estimate, Catalyst 9
- 152. The accompanying tablebreaks down ACS Survey information into households by number of units with specific age ranges shown. Our analysis of this information has uncovered an opportunity to better appeal to one specific demographic population; the Millennials. When compared to older population groups, the Millennials (defined as a person ranging in age from 15 to 34) are marked by their propensity to live in more urban environments with access to a range of activities and social endeavors. This population group has sparked the urban redevelopment in the core of cities such as Austin, Dallas, and Houston. Unlike their older peers, they are generally not as satisfied living in single use apartment communities such as the majority of multifamily housing stock in San Angelo or the older single-family homes present in the neighborhoods surrounding ASU. Their presence in these buildings is likely to identify a lack of housing options in the San Angelo marketplace and can be leveraged for new growth in Downtown that is more suited to the Millennial generation’s well-documented desires. Owner Renter Occupied Occupied Total 15 to 34 3,073 6,407 9,480 Single Family 2,976 2,669 5,645 Duplex-Quadplex (2-4) 404 404 Garden Apts (5-19) 2,289 2,289 Structured (20+) 898 898 Other 97 147 244 35 to 64 12,449 4,878 17,327 Single Family 12,096 2,379 14,475 Duplex-Quadplex (2-4) 30 391 421 Garden Apts (5-19) 23 1,406 1,429 Structured (20+) 453 453 Other 300 249 549 65 and Up 6,845 1,637 8,482 Single Family 6,497 480 6,977 Duplex-Quadplex (2-4) 35 70 105 Garden Apts (5-19) 65 170 235 Structured (20+) 68 917 985 Other 180 180 Percent of Total 26.9% 59.5% 4.3% 24.1% 9.5% 2.6% 49.1% 83.5% 2.4% 8.2% 2.6% 3.2% 24.0% 82.3% 1.2% 2.8% 11.6% 2.1% Structured (20+) Household Statistics and Unit Sizing Other Garden Apts (5-19) Single Family Summary Notes: • The Millennial Generation are the DuplexQuadplex (2-4) Millennials • The Millennial Generation is more likely to stay in Garden Apartments (24.1%) than any other Generation. Garden Structured Other Apts (5-19) (20+) DuplexQuadplex (2-4) • The Millennial Generation is also Single Family Gen X + Baby Boomers Garden Apts (5-19) least likely to stay in Single Family Housing. Structured (20+) likely to reside in Structured Apartments (9.5%). • Generation X and the Baby Boomer Generation will prefer to stay in Garden Apartments than Structured Apartments. • The Silent and Greatest Gen- Other eration are more likely to stay in Structured Housing (nursing homes and independent living) than Garden Apartments. DuplexQuadplex (2-4) Single Family Silent / Greatest Gen. Sources: 2011 ACS 5 yr estimate, Catalyst 10
- 153. The majority ofhousing in the San Angelo marketplace was built before 1980, with the largest percentage of units having been built between 1960 and 1979. This identifies San Angelo’s housing stock to be generally quite old when compared to other Texas communities and underscores the need for new investment due to a lack of product options and amenities. Given San Angelo’s highest population percentage are those below the age of 35, the City’s average age is comparatively young and the potential mismatch between these age ranges housing needs and desires with the conditions of the existing housing stock is an issue that will need to be addressed over time to allow the City to remain competitive. Built 1939 or Earlier Built 2000 or Later Built 1940 to 1959 15 to 34 Built 2000 or Later Built 1980 to 1999 Built 1960 to 1979 Built 1940 to 1959 Built 1939 or Earlier 35 to 64 Built 2000 or Later Built 1980 to 1999 Built 1960 to 1979 Built 1940 to 1959 Built 1939 or Earlier 65 and Up Built 2000 or Later Built 1980 to 1999 Built 1960 to 1979 Built 1940 to 1959 Built 1939 or Earlier Built 2000 or Later Built 1980 to 1999 Built 1960 to 1979 Millennials Built 1939 or Earlier Built 2000 or Later Built 1980 to 1999 Built 1940 to 1959 All Generations Renter Percent Occupied Total of Total 6,407 9,480 26.9% 597 1,054 11.1% 2,442 3,088 32.6% 2,150 3,049 32.2% 917 1,803 19.0% 301 486 5.1% 4,878 17,327 49.1% 365 1,493 8.6% 1,378 4,301 24.8% 1,832 5,349 30.9% 952 4,529 26.1% 351 1,655 9.6% 1,637 8,482 24.0% 83 619 7.3% 564 2,209 26.0% 734 3,088 36.4% 145 1,819 21.4% 111 747 8.8% Household Statistics and Housing Age Summary Notes: • The majority of households were Built 1980 to 1999 Built 1960 to 1979 Owner Occupied 3,073 457 646 899 886 185 12,449 1,128 2,923 3,517 3,577 1,304 6,845 536 1,645 2,354 1,674 636 Built 1940 to 1959 Built 1939 or Earlier • The Millennial Generation lives in newer product at a greater rate than the other generations. 43.7% of the households they live in were built after 1980. • Generation X, Baby Boomers, the Built 1960 to 1979 Gen X + Baby Boomers Built 1939 or Earlier built before 1980, with the largest percentage built between 1960 and 1979. Silent Generation, and the Greatest Generation, are fairly evenly distributed by the housing categories. Built 2000 or Later Built 1940 to 1959 Built 1980 to 1999 Built 1960 to 1979 Silent / Greatest Gen. Sources: 2011 ACS 5 yr estimate, Catalyst 11
- 154. Moved 2000 to 2004 Moved 1979 or Earlier Moved 1980to 1989 Moved 1990 to 1999 Moved 1990 to 1999 Moved 1980 to 1989 Moved 1979 or Earlier Moved 2005 or Later Moved 2005 or Later Moved 2000 to 2004 Summary Notes: • Nearly 50% of all move-ins have Millennials All Generations Owner Renter Percent Occupied Occupied Total of Total 15 to 34 3,073 6,407 9,480 26.9% Moved 2005 or Later 2,166 5,848 8,014 84.5% Moved 2000 to 2004 734 344 1,078 11.4% Moved 1990 to 1999 117 196 313 3.3% Moved 1980 to 1989 19 19 38 0.4% Moved 1979 or Earlier 37 37 0.4% 35 to 64 12,449 4,878 17,327 49.1% Moved 2005 or Later 3,478 3,753 7,231 41.7% Moved 2000 to 2004 2,517 593 3,110 17.9% Moved 1990 to 1999 3,737 390 4,127 23.8% Moved 1980 to 1989 1,654 95 1,749 10.1% Moved 1979 or Earlier 1,063 47 1,110 6.4% 65 and Up 6,845 1,637 8,482 24.0% Moved 2005 or Later 935 784 1,719 20.3% Moved 2000 to 2004 934 510 1,444 17.0% Moved 1990 to 1999 1,529 196 1,725 20.3% Moved 1980 to 1989 906 91 997 11.8% Moved 1979 or Earlier 2,541 56 2,597 30.6% Moved 1979 or Earlier Moved 1980 to Moved 1989 1990 to 1999 occurred since 2005. This reflects a relatively high transient population. The percentages by population group follow. • 84.5% of Millennials have moved into their households since 2005. Moved 2005 or Later • 49.1% of Generation X and Baby Boomers have moved into their households since 2005. Moved 2000 to 2004 • 37.3% of the Silent and Greatest Gen X + Baby Boomers Moved 1979 or Earlier Generation have moved into their households since 2000. Moved 2005 or Later Moved 1990 to 1999 Moved 1980 to 1989 Household Statistics - Length of Residence Moved 2000 to 2004 Silent / Greatest Gen. Sources: 2011 ACS 5 yr estimate, Catalyst 12
- 155. Totals Percentages 39,458 Total HouseholdUnits Household Incomes Within Target Area Household Incomes Outside Target Area Lower Density 41.3% High Density 41.1% Medium Density 17.6% Multi Family Housing Multi Family Lower Density Multi Family Medium Density Multi Family High Density Total Occupied 1,631 701 1,635 3,967 Occupied Household Units Vacant Units 35,289 4,169 89.4% 10.6% Owner Occupied HH Units Renter Occupier HH Units 22,367 12,922 63.4% 36.6% 2,549 2,742 2,665 2,635 2,369 2,114 2,203 1,549 1,626 2,866 3,857 3,631 2,010 1,055 680 738 7.2% 7.8% 7.6% 7.5% 6.7% 6.0% 6.2% 4.4% 4.6% 8.1% 10.9% 10.3% 5.7% 3.0% 1.9% 2.1% Median Household Incomes Less than $10,000 $10,000 to $14,999 $15,000 to $19,999 $20,000 to $24,999 $25,000 to $29,999 $30,000 to $34,999 $35,000 to $39,999 $40,000 to $44,999 $45,000 to $49,999 $50,000 to $59,999 $60,000 to $74,999 $75,000 to $99,999 $100,000 to $124,999 $125,000 to $149,999 $150,000 to $199,999 $200,000 or more Vacant 406 169 394 969 Total 2,037 870 2,029 4,936 Vacancy Percentage Percentage of Total 19.9% 41.3% 19.4% 17.6% 19.4% 41.1% 58.8% 100.0% Sources: 2011 ACS 5 yr estimate, Catalyst Household Statistics - Housing Density & Income Summary Notes: • Median Household incomes are used as a major determinate for new real estate product types. • For new residential development, households with median income between $35,000 and $100,000 are often isolated to determine the market for upscale attached residential, as well as retail/restaurant. 44.6% of the trade area households fall within this range. • The majority of Multi Family density is in structures between 10-19 units (Low Density Garden Apartments), and 50+ (High Rise and High Density Structured Apartments). • 20% of the Multi Family Market is considered Medium Density (20 to 49 units per structure). 13
- 156. In the 2010Census there were 39,548 household units within San Angelo. 2010 5yr ACS Estimate show 44,952 jobs, which means there are approximately 1.14 jobs per household, or 0.88 households created for every job. These trends however are a baseline from 1990, 2000, and 2010 census data and do not take into account any new economic activity driven by major employers in the area, including a potential oil boom. The baseline 2020 projection suggests an increase of 2,828 jobs, however, between the years 2010 and 2011, Census Bureau data shows 1,390 jobs have already been added (2011 ACS data has a figure of 46,392 jobs). The latest Texas Workforce Development data for the San Angelo MSA show 47,500 in April, 2013. The San Angelo MSA covers the counties of Irion and Tom Green, but it is clear that recent numbers indicate that the baseline 2020 job projection of 47,780 will be surpassed. Employment and Projections The 2011 American Community Survey data shows that out of the 46,392 jobs in the City of San Angelo, 22,305 are considered “white collar”. This White Collar percentage, a combination of Information, Finance and Insurance, processional, scientific and management, educational and health care, and public administration, is a robust 48.1%. Summary Notes: • The American Community Survey 5 year estimate measures 46,392 jobs in San Angelo. Therefore according to baseline data, out of the 2,828 new jobs created within the next ten years, 48.1%, or 1,360 jobs will be office oriented. These jobs will require office space. Any additional job growth will maintain the same percentage, depending on the industry. 1990 2000 2010 2020 Comp / EASI Census Census / ACS Projection 10 Year Growth Population HH Units Employment 84,474 34,891 n/a 88,439 37,699 n/a 93,200 39,548 44,952 98,757 42,036 47,780 5,557 2,488 2,828 • 22,305, or 48.1%, are white collar or office jobs. • Baseline projections are based upon growth since 1990. 10 year growth figures are: - 5,557 People - 2,488 Households Employment Categories Agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting, and mining Construction Manufacturing Wholesale trade Retail trade Transportation and warehousing, and utilities Information Finance and insurance, and real estate and rental and leasing Professional, scientific, and management, and administrative and waste management services Educational services, and health care and social assistance Public administration Arts, entertainment, and recreation, and accommodation and food services Other services (except public administration) Armed forces* Total Work Force Employment: Total Percentage 1,017 2.2% 2,677 5.8% 2,648 5.7% 995 2.1% 5,507 11.9% 995 2.1% 1,575 3.4% 2,529 5.5% 3,570 7.7% 11,529 24.9% 3,102 6.7% 4,259 9.2% 2,392 5.2% 3,597 7.8% 46,392 100.0% Office-Oriented Jobs 22,305 - 2,828 Jobs • 2011 estimates indicate an in- crease of nearly 1,500 new jobs. More than half the projected baseline growth. 48.1% Sources: 2010 Census, 2011 ACS 5 yr estimate, EASI, City of San Angelo Comprehensive Plan, Catalyst 14
- 157. The City ofSan Angelo has a number of large employers. The top employer is Goodfellow Air Force Base with 5,165 total employees. The Shannon Health System is second highest at 2,627 employees. The next largest employers are part of the education system. San Angelo ISD and Shannon Health System are largely tied with the population of San Angelo. The former especially will grow as additional residents move into the city. Other organizations tied to the population of the city are the San Angelo Community Medical Center, City of San Angelo, and Tom Green County. BlueCross BlueShield of Texas is tied to employment and jobs within the area, and as more jobs come, this organization will likely grow as well. Employers With the recent advances in the energy sector, it is anticipated that related employers will rise in these rankings. Summary Notes: • Goodfellow Air Force Base is the largest employer with over 5,000 employees. • Angelo State University has 1,680 employees. • The other top employers in the area are tied to population and job growth. These include: 1) San Angelo ISD 2) City of San Angelo 3) Tom Green County 4) Medical Facilities • A potential new driver of popula- tion and employment could be the oil and gas industry. Sources: San Angelo Chamber of Commerce, www.investmentu.com, Catalyst 15
- 158. Land Use Programming DowntownSan Angelo Legend Restaurant Type 1 Joes Brewhouse & Winery Pub Food & Pizza 2 The Office Bar 3 Concho's Bar & Food 4 Re Rees Bar 5 Diegos Buritos Mexican Food 6 Mesquite Bean Breakfast Café and Coffee 7 Sealy Flats Seafood, Music, and Bar 8 Miss Hattie's Restaurant 9 Stangos Coffee Shop Lunch and Late Night Café Office Demand Calculations Bar 10 Grinners Bar 11 The Dead Horse Bar 12 Tejano Country Bar & Music 13 House of FiFi DuBois Bar & Music 14 Chadbourne Street Deli Sandwich / Subs 15 Fuente's Mexican Food 16 Fat Boss Pub Pub 17 Private Venue Private Venue 18 Black Swan Gallery Wine Bar 19 Blaine's Pub Bar & Music 20 37 Ice Cream 21 Julio's Burritos Mexican Food 22 McDonalds Fast Food 23 Subway Sandwich / Subs 24 Grandy's Buffet 25 Quiznos Sandwich / Subs 26 Burger King Fast Food 27 TBD Under Construction 28 Schlotzky's Sandwich / Subs 29 Zero One Ale House Bar & Pub 30 Sonic Fast Food 31 FL's Garden Private Venue 32 Los Panchitos 2011 Employment 10 year baseline Growth $2,000,000 $1,800,000 $1,600,000 $1,400,000 $1,200,000 $1,000,000 $800,000 $600,000 $400,000 $200,000 $- Mexican 46,392 jobs 2,828 jobs Additional Jobs in ten year period ASU Projected Growth Oil and Gas Market Total Additional Jobs 806 jobs 5,012 jobs 5,818 jobs Total Jobs 8,646 jobs Projected Office-Oriented Jobs (48.1%) Potential Building Area (using 250s sf/employee ratio) Assumed Vacancy Fill Rate Downtown Capture Rate Potential New Downtown Space (10 years+) 16 4,159 1,039,697 15.0 25.0 jobes sf % % 220,936 sf
- 159. American Community Surveyestimates measure a total of 46,392 jobs for 2011. The ten year baseline growth based on census bureau statistics dating back to 1990, measure a 10 year baseline growth of 2,828 jobs. The one year employment growth from 2010 to 2011 is 1,500 jobs, nearly half the baseline growth implying additional jobs are being added due to recent investment in the energy industry. Angelo State University is growing, and is projected to conservatively add another 806 jobs in the period. During the ten year period, an additional 8,648 jobs will be added, including the baseline growth, and additional jobs spurred on by the education and energy sectors. Office Analysis Utilizing the current office-oriented percentage of 48.1%, and applying it to the total number of new jobs, Catalyst projects an additional 4,159 office oriented jobs. This accounts for over 1 million sf. Summary Notes: Assuming 15% of this growth will fill current vacancies, and applying a conservative capture rate of 25%, San Angelo downtown can expect over 200,000 sf in new office space. Office Demand Calculations 2011 Employment 10 year baseline Growth • 8,646 total new jobs in San Angelo. • 4,159 office-oriented jobs. • 250 sf / employment ratio equates to 1,097,697 sf of potential building area. • 15% vacancy fill rate. 46,392 jobs 2,828 jobs Additional Jobs in ten year period ASU Projected Growth Oil and Gas Market Total Additional Jobs • 220,936 sf of potential new downtown space. 806 jobs 5,012 jobs 5,818 jobs Total Jobs • 25% downtown capture rate. 8,646 jobs Projected Office-Oriented Jobs (48.1%) Potential Building Area (using 250s sf/employee ratio) Assumed Vacancy Fill Rate Downtown Capture Rate Potential New Downtown Space (10 years+) 4,159 1,039,697 15.0 25.0 jobs sf % % 220,936 sf Sources: 2011 ACS 5 yr estimate, City of San Angelo, Catalyst 17
- 160. Retail Leakage byESRI’s Business Analyst measures the difference between demand for different retail services, and the supply within a trade area. The City of San Angelo has a negative restaurant gap; however, since San Angelo is a regional draw, the restaurant demand trade area goes out further than the current supply/demand trade boundary. The table below indicates that on a restaurant per population basis, San Angelo is right at the average of similar sized cities. With regards to sales per restaurant the graph to shows significantly lower than average (indicated by dashed red line), implying there is opportunity for increased total restaurant sales, either by more choice, or improved experiences. Restaurant Analysis $2,000,000 $1,800,000 $1,600,000 $1,400,000 $1,200,000 $1,000,000 $800,000 $600,000 $400,000 $200,000 $- Summary Notes: • Negative retail gap due to regional nature of San Angelo. • there are 13.33 restaurants per 10,000 people in San Angelo, right at the average of similar cities. • Sales per restaurant in the downtown area is low. Demand Supply (Retail Potential) (Retail Sales) NAICS Industry Group Food Services & Drinking Places Retail Gap Leakage/Surplus Factor Number of Businesses 722 $77,511,210 $103,581,369 -$26,070,159 -14.4 127 Full-Service Restaurants 7221 $30,396,531 $58,211,508 -$27,814,977 Limited-Service Eating Places 7222 $39,800,255 $39,804,517 7223 $2,141,674 7224 $5,172,750 Special Food Services Drinking Places - Alcoholic Beverages Cities San Marcos Temple San Angelo College Station Tyler Odessa Midland Denton Abilene Waco Lubbock Totals Total Population Restaurants 47,433 89 69,307 90 95,293 127 97,074 112 98,715 144 102,361 152 115,168 158 118,240 135 118,365 142 127,339 185 234,999 313 1,224,294 1,647 -31.4 0.0 51 $1,429,886 $711,788 19.9 6 $4,135,458 $1,037,292 11.1 20 unique dining experiences such as food trucks, or restaurant incubator space. 50 -$4,262 • Opportunity for demand through • Additional growth brought in by Angelo State University and the oil and gas industry will create demand for additional full service restaurants. Downtown Area* (2012 ESRI) City Totals (2012 ESRI) Total Total Food and Drink Total Food and Drink Total Food and Total Food and Restaurant / Drink Supply Drink Supply / Rest Population (10,000) Restaurants Supply Supply / Rest $ 89,806,061 $ 1,009,057 18.76 19 $ 37,470,772 $ 1,972,146 $ 98,262,074 $ 1,091,801 12.99 7 $ 4,219,473 $ 602,782 $ 103,581,369 $ 815,601 13.33 20 $ 9,697,633 $ 484,882 $ 124,768,024 $ 1,114,000 11.54 23 $ 29,820,580 $ 1,296,547 $ 133,254,061 $ 925,375 14.59 8 $ 5,656,169 $ 707,021 $ 140,325,819 $ 923,196 14.85 14 $ 8,093,042 $ 578,074 $ 155,938,222 $ 986,951 13.72 14 $ 11,703,770 $ 835,984 $ 118,284,441 $ 876,181 11.42 14 $ 2,943,096 $ 210,221 $ 160,079,930 $ 1,127,323 12.00 6 $ 7,844,041 $ 1,307,340 $ 186,378,388 $ 1,007,451 14.53 22 $ 13,062,822 $ 593,765 $ 283,604,470 $ 906,085 13.32 13 $ 4,657,184 $ 358,245 $ 1,594,282,859 $ 967,992 13.45 160 $ 135,168,582 $ 844,804 *Downtown Area an approximate area designated through aerial analysis Sources: ESRI Business Analyst, Census Bureau, Catalyst 18
- 161. ESRI 2012 BusinessAnalyst measure 127 restaurants within San Angelo, and 20 restaurants in the downtown area. Restaurant Analysis Existing Facilities On the field studies by Catalyst, as seen in the map below counted 32 downtown establishments (including night life, bars, and delis). Summary Notes: Legend Restaurant • 32 total restaurants in the area Type 1 Joes Brewhouse & Winery Pub Food & Pizza 2 The Office Bar 3 Concho's Bar & Food 4 Re Rees Bar 5 Diegos Buritos Mexican Food 6 Mesquite Bean Breakfast Café and Coffee 7 Sealy Flats Seafood, Music, and Bar 8 Miss Hattie's Restaurant 9 Stangos Coffee Shop Lunch and Late Night Café including: Bar 10 Grinners Bar 12 Tejano Country Bar & Music 13 House of FiFi DuBois Bar & Music 14 Chadbourne Street Deli Sandwich / Subs 15 Fuente's Pub 17 Private Venue Wine Bar 19 Blaine's Pub Bar & Music 20 37 Ice Cream 21 Julio's Burritos Mexican Food 22 McDonalds Sandwich / Subs 24 Grandy's Buffet 25 Quiznos Sandwich / Subs 26 Burger King Fast Food 27 TBD - Ice Cream - Fast Food - Buffets - Deli / Sandwich Private Venue 32 Los Panchitos - Private Venues Fast Food 31 FL's Garden Bar & Pub 30 Sonic - Music Venues Sandwich / Subs 29 Zero One Ale House Under Construction 28 Schlotzky's - Lunch Fast Food 23 Subway Private Venue 18 Black Swan Gallery - Mexican Food Mexican Food 16 Fat Boss Pub Bar 11 The Dead Horse - Pub Food - Bars Mexican Map and Table Sources: ESRI, City of San Angelo, Catalyst 19
- 162. Demand for restaurantswill increase with population growth. In 2011, the population of San Angelo was 92,334, and baseline population growth is 5,557. This number will increase due to additional economic activity occurring due to the education and economic sectors. Angelo State University is conservatively expected to add 806 jobs, and the oil and gas sector will add 5,012 jobs. Total additional jobs, including baseline projections is 16,990 people. This population increase, including growth from economic sectors, is 18.4%, and applying that to the total number of restaurants results in demand for 23 new restaurants in San Angelo. Utilizing a capture rate of 25% indicates demand for 6 additional restaurants in Downtown San Angelo. There is also opportunity for existing restaurants to reinvent themselves to capture additional sales in line with downtowns of similar sized cities. Restaurant Demand Calculations Restaurants in San Angelo Restaurants in Downtown San Angelo 127 restaurants 32 restaurants 2011 San Angelo Population 10 year baseline Growth 806 5,012 5,818 11,433 Total Population added in 10 year period Summary Notes: • 16,990 additional population growth expected. • Applying growth rate to number of restaurants creates potential demand for 23 new restaurants in San Angelo. • A 25% capture rate indicates de- mand for 6 new Downtown San Angelo Restaurants. 92,334 people 5,557 people Additional Jobs in ten year period ASU Projected Growth Oil and Gas Market Total Additional Jobs Additional Population created by jobs (1.96) Restaurant Analysis Demand 16,990 people Population Increase as a percentage Total Additional Restaurants in San Angelo Downtown Capture Rate Total Additional Restaurants in downtown San Angelo 18.4 23 25.0 6 jobs jobs jobs people % restaurants % restaurants Compostie Source Analysis: Catalyst 20
- 163. Baseline 10 yeargrowth for households is measured at 2,488. Additional jobs in the ten year period, at a 0.88 hh created per job ratio, (San Angelo average), will create 5,120 new households. Applying a renter occupied percentage of 38.8%, and a target household income percentage of 46.6%, creates demand for 1,242 new multi family units. San Angelo Phase 2 is expected to supply 224 additional units, providing demand for 1,034 new multifamily units. The approximate median age for existing multi family units in San Angelo is 30 years. Vacancy for product built within the last 30 years is 7.04%, and vacant for product built more than 30 years ago, is 14.51%.This indicates that there are 1,418 target renters in older product, creating a total pool of 2,452 multi family units. Applying a 25% capture rate equates to demand for 613 multi family units in Downtown San Angelo Summary Notes: • Baseline 10 year demand is 2,488 households. • Additional jobs will add 5,180 Multi Family Demand Calculations Baseline 10 year Demand Housing Analysis households. 2,488 households • Applying a rental occupied per- Additional Jobs in ten year period ASU Projected Growth Oil and Gas Market Total Additional Jobs Households created by Employees (0.88/job) 806 5,012 5,818 5,120 Total Households added in 10 year period Rental Occupied Households (36.6%) Target HH Income (44.6%) 7,608 households 2,785 rental HH 1,242 MF Units centage rate and a target household income median rate equals demand for 1,034 units (including new supply coming online). jobs jobs jobs households Supply - San Angelo Place (Phase 2) 1,034 units Existing MF Supply Age (5+ units / structure) Within last 30 years Vacancy Percentage Older than 30 years Vacany Percentage 3,400 7.06 3,319 14.51 Target Current Renters 35K to 100K Target Renters in Newer Product Target Renters in Older Product 4,578 householders 3,160 householders 1,418 householders Multifamily Demand from Growth Target Renters in Older Product Total Target Market Capture Rate Downtown MF Market 1,034 1,418 2,452 25 613 living in multifamily product that is older than 30 years. 224 units Multifamily Demand from Growth • There are 1,418 target renters • The total target market for the City of San Angelo is 2,452 multi family units. units % units % • Downtown San Angelo has de- mand for 613 multi family units (using a capture rate of 25%). households households households % MF Units Composite Source Analysis: Catalyst 21
- 164. The following tablesummarizes baseline growth for population, households, and employment, for the City of San Angelo, additional growth expected from Angelo State University and the Energy Sector, over a ten year period. Programming Summary This total growth will lead to new development in the housing, restaurant, and office sectors of Downtown San Angelo. There are redevelopment opportunities available due to older product in the housing and office market and limited variety in the food industry. Summary Notes: • Potential new development: Summary Sheet 2011 Population 2011 Household 2011 Employment Baseline Growth 10 year population 10 year household 10 year employment 92,334 people 39,458 households 46,392 jobs - 613 MF Units - 6 Restaurants - 220,936 sf of Office Space 5,557 people 2,488 households 2,828 jobs Additional Growth Expected from ASU & Energy Sector Population 11,381 people Household 5,818 households Employment 5,792 jobs Total Growth 10 year population total 10 year household total 10 year employment total 16,938 people 8,306 households 8,620 jobs New Development within Downtown San Angelo Multifamily Units 613 units Restaurants 6 restaurants Office Space 220,936 sf Composite Source Analysis: Catalyst 22
- 165. Physical and PolicyAnalysis Downtown San Angelo 23
- 166. Physical Area Opportunities Summary Notes: • Existing factors include: - Large urban footprint - Varied densities Sources: ESRI, City of San Angelo, Catalyst - Regional core - Range of identities 24
- 167. Downtown Infrastructure Summary Notes: Downtown Infrastructure • Map shows existing water and waste water utilities. • Infrastructure is already in place. • Infrsatructure will accommodate new redevelopment and reinvestment. Sources: City of San Angelo, Catalyst 25
- 168. Ownership Type Analysis Summary Notes: • Map shows parcels highlighted by ownership, city, and other public or private entity. • River corridor is controlled by City of San Angelo. • Tom Green County controls other property with potential for new development. • Majority of land is is privately owned and property assembly for new projects will likely require private sector involvement. Sources: ESRI, City of San Angelo,Tom Green Appraisal District, Catalyst 26
- 169. Land Assembly Analysis Summary Notes: • Map differentiates blocks by the number of owners. Blocks with fewer owners will be easier to assemble. • There are simpler land assembly opportunities to the North. • There are simpler land assembly opportunities near Fort Concho, the Art District, and the river corridor. • Difficult land assemblies in the historic downtown core. Sources: ESRI, City of San Angelo,Tom Green Appraisal District, Catalyst 27
- 170. Assessed Value Analysis Summary Notes: • Map shows parcels differentiated by assessed total value by square footage. Assessed values are from the local appraisal district. • There are lower values in the Northern part of Downtown. • There are lower values along the river corridor. • There are lower values near Fort Concho and the Art Museum. • There are higher values along Bryant and the primary highway 67 intersection. Sources: ESRI, City of San Angelo,Tom Green Appraisal District, Catalyst 28
- 171. Tax Generation Analysis Summary Notes: • This map measures tax generation potential by comparing assessed improvement values with lot acreage. Lots with improvements that generate tax revenue are highlighted in red, and potential tax generating parcels are in green. • Due to a combination of publicly owned property and vacant/under utilized land, there are large zones of underperforming tax parcels within downtown. Sources: ESRI, City of San Angelo,Tom Green Appraisal District, Catalyst 29
- 172. Local Regulations Summary Notes: • This map shows locally designated historic districts. • Locally regulated historic districts have effect on what can be done within the downtown core. Sources: City of San Angelo, Catalyst 30
- 173. Ease of Development Summary Notes: • This map combines the elements of development from the previous maps in to blocks. • Large groupings of redevelopment blocks are at: - North Bryant BLVD - MLK Dr. and Farr Streets - Oakes Street - Around Fort Concho - Around Art Museum • These are theoretical and may not prove to be successful based on ownership and adjacency elements. Sources: ESRI, City of San Angelo,Tom Green Appraisal District, Catalyst 31
- 174. Identity Subdistricts Summary Notes: • Thismap illustrates clear identity districts based on the following anchors: - County Facilities - Shannon Medical Center - Art Museum - Fort Concho - Concho River - Concho Retailers - Primary Intersections • Connecting with these subdis- trict identities will be key to the financing and marketing of future projects. Sources: ESRI, City of San Angelo,Tom Green Appraisal District, Catalyst 32
- 175. Historic Sites Summary Notes: • This map shows historic sites as designated by the National Register of Historic Places, and the City of San Angelo Historic Preservation Society. • New developments should be in line with regulation in place to preserve the rich character of these communities. Sources: ESRI, City of San Angelo, National Register of Historic Place, City of San Angelo Historic Preservation Society, Catalyst 33
- 176. Impacting Features Summary Notes: • This map layers in additional impacting features that affect new development. • Additional elements to con- sider beyond historic sites include churches, and high rise office buildings, • All development will also factor in the 100 year flood plain. Sources: ESRI, City of San Angelo, National Register of Historic Place, City of San Angelo Historic Preservation Society,Tom Green Appraisal District, Catalyst 34
- 177. Opportunity Sites Summary Notes: • This map shows potential op- portunity sites layered in with all impacting features. • The type and quantity of new real estate investment would be determined by the market demand and requirements for specific site location. Sources: ESRI, City of San Angelo, National Register of Historic Place, City of San Angelo Historic Preservation Society,Tom Green Appraisal District, Catalyst 35
- 178. Existing Policy Summary Notes: • The Comprehensive Plan update prepared for the downtown area includes sounds planning concepts that require additional vetting through a market and real estate analysis. • This analysis has identified ad- ditional opportunities beyond the project areas identified in the Plan update. • This market analysis and related programming concepts provides a more aligned master development strategy for specific projects within a 10-year development period. Sources: City of San Angelo Comprehensive Plan, Catalyst 36
- 179. Comprehensive Plan Update Districts SummaryNotes: Comprehensive Plan Update Districts • The programming and market study conducted in this report allow for nuanced development of restaurant, office, and residential uses. Highway Commercial Commercial Improvements Bryant Gateway Shannon Medical District Medical District SAISD Civic Activity District • Shannon Medical District and Bryan Gateway are ideally suited for office and light industrial uses. • There is opportunity for an ad- Riverfront Redev. ditional restaurant district along Chadbourne. Arts/Heritage District Riverfront Entertainment Irving Street / City Hall North River District 1 (Koeningheim – Chadbourne) Central High School District River District 3 – (Oakes – Rio Concho) River District 2 (Convention Center Area) Sources: City of San Angelo Comprehensive Plan, Catalyst 37
- 180.
- 181. Background The redevelopment programpresented hereafter is the synthesis of the previous sections. The primary economic drivers in the area (energy sector, ASU, and Goodfellow Air Force Base), are each experiencing growth or continued activity that helps drive additional investment in the San Angelo marketplace. The trade area analysis, in conjunction with the growth experienced by the primary economic drivers, has identified new development potential as set out in the land use programming that centers on three themes: continued restaurant and entertainment investment, the addition of workplace and employment uses, and residential infill. The physical and policy analysis of the downtown area has identified various locations for the City, its downtown marketing agents, and property owners to focus efforts towards. Downtown Focus Areas Specific economic development policy should be created that focuses such efforts towards the creation of more recognizable development sub-districts to be created having clear regional identities. Specifically, the restaurant infill focus should be on and near Chadbourne Street, (within two blocks); new employment and office infill should occur to the north of Shannon Medical Center, around the rail station depot, and on and near (within two blocks) of the western portion of Harris Street; and residential infill activity should be focused along the Concho River and around the Fort Concho/Art walk area district. All economic development programs and policies within downtown that are devised to encourage the new investment in these focus areas should be tailored to address the following concepts. Does the policy and activity… - ...strengthen the focus area’s identity? - ...create potential for additional business revenue? - ...provide connections between activities? - ...improve pedestrian and vehicular infrastructure? - ...provide or reinforce usable and defined open space? - ...enhance safety and cleanliness? - ...encourage additional redevelopment and reinvestment? Downtown Redevelopment Restaurant In-Fill Focus Area The largest concentration of restaurants in Downtown San Angelo is along Chadbourne Street. Creating continued focus along Chadbourne and within two blocks on the east/west streets that cross Chadbourne will create the momentum needed to reach the critical mass required for a more definable downtown restaurant district. Implementation Note: To better define and direct these efforts, economic development incentive tools may be utilized to offset the relatively high upfront tenant improvement costs required for such investment. This may include identifying and presenting these restaurant concepts to recipients of federal allocations of New Markets Tax Credits. The City or downtown interest groups may also assist this process by identifying potential investors interested in buying these tax credits, with a particular focus on companies experiencing high gains in the energy sector. This program may be well suited for companies focused on the region’s energy sector in that they would get a double benefit from investing in such tax credits as they would receive the credit itself plus the more intangible returns associated with having a more vibrant downtown environment with restaurant and entertainment that will help attract and retain their employee base. In addition, the other programs identified as Urban Development Finance Tools shown in this document should be investigated for their applicability as well. To better target specific restaurant potential, it is suggested Downtown San Angelo Inc. prepare a restaurant loca- Sources: Catalyst 39
- 182. tion map highlightingall existing restaurants and identifying their cuisine and special activities/capabilities for marketing purposes. Further, a restaurant programming exercise should be prepared working with existing restaurant owners that identifies the existing voids in cuisine to better target new marketing activity towards specific types of restaurant investment to generate a stronger critical mass and selection for the broader marketplace. Work Place In-Fill Focus Area The largest driver of new employment in the San Angelo region is those companies associated with the energy sector. Targeted effort should be made on attracting these new employers to sites in the Downtown footprint rather than in the more traditional locations being developed on the periphery of the City. This is the case for such development on the edge does not capitalize on the critical mass in use and activity their employees can experience in Downtown. They are required to leave these areas to have lunch, acquire services, etc. that locating in Downtown would offer. From the City’s perspective, such infill development in Downtown will introduce new daytime population that will further momentum in retail, service and restaurant investment, and will bring the added recognition that will strengthen San Angelo’s Downtown identity as a regional center of mixed-use experience that can advance the City’s brand itself. The opportunity sites analysis highlights four areas for such new investment. First, the existing office buildings in San Angelo are equipped to handle more conventional office infill and should be marketed as such. Second, there are underutilized properties on the entire north side of downtown and around the railroad line that can accommodate larger footprint new development in which office may front the street with storage and parking behind. There are additional opportunities around Shannon Medical Center for new health-science infill development. And there are smaller sites along West Harris for infill of single user executive office buildings. Downtown Redevelopment Implementation Note: Given much of Downtown San Angelo’s existing commercial, industrial and office building stock is older, or contained within more difficult land assemblies, attracting such new investment is much more difficult than the effort required to locate new construction on a greenfield site along the Loop. In addition, the needs of new office users are generally beyond the amenities existing office buildings can offer. As such, special economic development tools should be focused to mitigate these difficulties for new investors, make locating in downtown more economically attractive, and make existing assets more competitive and functional. Such economic development tools should be targeted to these two user groups. First, any tax abatement that is considered for users in an edge-city condition should also be considered for Downtown locations. Secondly, New Markets Tax Credits are a tool that can be utilized for both new construction and renovations of existing office buildings downtown. Further, the City should define Downtown San Angelo as a special enterprise district that offers small businesses a host of amenities that can be marketed effectively by the Chamber and Downtown San Angelo Inc. These include allowing all downtown businesses to operate within a collected insurance program in which all insurance needs can be purchased at bulk rates (rather than rates for small operations only), identifying and making available small meeting space at no cost, and other incentives yet to be identified. Finally, the Downtown TRZ (and the other Urban Development Finance Tools identified in this document) should be utilized to incentivize new site Sources: Catalyst 40
- 183. development in theareas of Downtown’s northern zone. Finance Tools identified in this document) should be focused to assist in the payback of certain site improvements Housing Infill Focus Area that further the larger goal of interconnectivity and public The analysis has identified two areas suitable for immedi- spaces in these areas. ate infill of various residential products within downtown. The neighborhoods surrounding the Arts Walk and Historic Fort Concho are ripe for lower density infill development that includes small lot single-family, attached single-family and townhomes, and lower density multifamily on primary corridors. The properties along the Concho River hold immediate potential for the infill of medium and higher density multifamily development, so long as these are implemented utilizing a higher quality standard of exterior masonry materials and architectural designs that compliment adjacent downtown structures. The addition of a new residential night-time population will further the goals for strengthened commercial development in downtown and provide a new population and activity that will help further Downtown’s identity as a regional mixed-use destination. Downtown Redevelopment Implementation Note: Housing development in and around the riverfront will carry higher site costs and material standards inherent and necessary in this high-visibility area. Such development will also carry costs associated with maintaining a fully connected public access with accompanying improved open spaces. As these higher costs add higher risk to the initial investors, and given such ongoing development will require initial private successes to provide new comparables that future/on-going developments will require, the City and related groups such as the San Angelo Health Foundation may help mitigate this higher cost of development by making their lands available for purchase or ground lease at rates conducive to such initial development. Further, the downtown tax increment reinvestment program (and the other Urban Development Sources: Catalyst 41
- 184. In the nextten years Downtown San Angelo has demand for six new restaurants. Locating restaurants along and near Chadbourne Street will create the critical mass needed for a more defined restaurant district. The City of San Angelo should coordinate an effort to identify current cuisine options, and encourage a more diverse restaurant offering downtown through addition of new restaurant types. This should be done in close coordination with Downtown San Angelo Inc. and the existing restaurant owners. This should lead towards a collected marketing campaign for Downtown’s restaurant and entertainment establishments. Investment Concept 1: Restaurant Infill These efforts should be economically incentivized to achieve initial catalytic investment. Development standards should be enhanced to include tenant improvement and signage criteria aimed to create a stronger visual presence for restaurants Downtown. Sources: ESRI, City of San Angelo, National Register of Historic Place, City of San Angelo Historic Preservation Society,Tom Green Appraisal District, Catalyst 42
- 185. Restaurant Infill Zone Parcels SummaryNotes: Chadbourne Area 1 Parcels Appraisal District Parcels • This Chadbourne Area map identi- 2 28 fies specific parcels that may hold potential for new restaurant in-fill. These are presented for informational and programming purposes only and should not be considered mandates for redevelopment or acquisition. 3 29 4 31 30 5 6 7 32 • Please refer to the following pages 8 33 and note the map ID to cross reference parcels with ownership data. 34 35 38 9 36 37 39 12 10 11 13 e Oak 40 41 15 14 16 17 18 43 44 19 20 20 45 22 21 46 54 47 t sS 42 48 49 50 51 52 53 23 24 25 0 26 µ 27 140 280 560 Feet Source: Esri, i-cubed, USDA, USGS, AEX, GeoEye, Getmapping, Aerogrid, IGN, IGP, and the GIS User Community, Copyright:© 2012 Esri, DeLorme, NAVTEQ, TomTom Sources: ESRI, City of San Angelo, National Register of Historic Place, City of San Angelo Historic Preservation Society,Tom Green Appraisal District, Catalyst 43
- 186. Restaurant Infill Zone Parcels MapID 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Tax ID 2341800600000500 2341800600000400 2341800600000100 2341800600001100 2341800600001300 2341800600001400 2341800600001500 2341700007001500 2341700007001700 2341700007001600 2341700007000400 2341700007000400 2341700007000100 2341700001003100 2341700001003200 2341700001003400 2341700001003300 2341700001002300 2341700001002200 2341700001002000 2341700001002100 2341700001001700 2341700001001600 2341700001001800 2341700001000200 2341700001000100 2341700001000300 2341700001000500 Total Appraised Value $ 49,150 $ 40,500 $ $ 31,300 $ 33,000 $ 24,050 $ 153,300 $ $ 113,450 $ 98,050 $ 61,250 $ 131,700 $ 59,700 $ 299,600 $ 58,450 $ 74,850 $ 9,000 $ 122,650 $ 60,050 $ 40,350 $ 37,250 $ 9,100 $ $ 22,500 $ 47,100 $ 70,100 $ 96,200 $ 44,200 Owner West John J West John J First Baptist Church Chadwick Properties Ltd Chadwick Properties Ltd Chadwick Properties Ltd Capador Springs Lp / K&M Springs First United Methodist Church Of SA V Square Properties / Robert Meyer Hopkins Timothy Daniel Susan Merle Daniel Susan Merle One East Twohig Partnership One East Twohig Partnership Fickling Georgina L Swa Gito LLC Rogers Hicks & Rogers Properties LP Rogers Hicks & Rogers Properties LP Rogers Hicks & Rogers Properties LP Choate Guy & Eva Moutos-Choate Choate Eva Mouto & Guy D 7 West Twohig Partnership City of San Angelo 7 West Twohig Partnership Cranek Lindsay Liberty Cafe LLC Fleming Dan & Maylyn Jewell Larry C Sr Dec&Patricia Anne Owner Phone Number (325) 655-8181 (325) 655-8181 (325) 655-4101 (325) 651-6326 (325) 651-6326 (325) 651-6326 (325) 651-0344 (325) 655-8981 (325) 944-7714 (325) 658-1511 (325) 653-2582 (325) 653-8095 (325) 653-8095 (325) 653-8095 (325) 653-6866 (325) 657-4241 (325) 651-6951 Owner Street PO BOX 1329 S CHADBOURNE PO BOX 1329 S CHADBOURNE 37 E Harris 6002 WINNERS CIR 6002 WINNERS CIR 22 S CHADBOURNE 212 CEDARWOOD 37 E BEAUREGARD AVE 2104 DOUGLAS DR 121 S CHADBOURNE 118 S CHADBOURNE 118 S CHADBOURNE 1 E TWOHIG 2ND FLOOR 1 E TWOHIG 2610 A & M 204 S CHADBOURNE 210 S CHADBOURNE 210 S CHADBOURNE 1326 KENWOOD DR PO BOX 1271 PO BOX 1271 201 S CHADBOURNE PO BOX 1751 S CHADBOURNE 201 S CHADBOURNE 547 CEDARWOOD 3619 S JACKSON ST 9895 BENSON ROAD 1319 S OAKES Owner City SAN ANGELO SAN ANGELO SAN ANGELO SAN ANGELO SAN ANGELO SAN ANGELO SAN ANGELO SAN ANGELO SAN ANGELO SAN ANGELO SAN ANGELO SAN ANGELO SAN ANGELO SAN ANGELO SAN ANGELO SAN ANGELO SAN ANGELO SAN ANGELO SAN ANGELO SAN ANGELO SAN ANGELO SAN ANGELO SAN ANGELO SAN ANGELO SAN ANGELO SAN ANGELO MENARD SAN ANGELO Owner State TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX Sources: City of San Angelo,Tom Green Appraisal District, Catalyst Owner Zip Acreage SF $ / SF 76902 0.11 5,001 $ 9.83 76902 0.09 3,750 $ 10.80 76903 0.36 15,625 $ 76904 0.16 7,068 $ 4.43 76904 0.07 2,833 $ 11.65 76903 0.13 5,500 $ 4.37 76905 0.13 5,500 $ 27.87 76903 0.44 19,261 $ 76904 0.07 3,250 $ 34.91 76903 0.07 3,250 $ 30.17 76903 0.07 3,250 $ 18.85 76903 0.07 3,250 $ 40.52 76903 0.37 16,250 $ 3.67 76903 0.10 4,500 $ 66.58 76904 0.09 3,750 $ 15.59 76903 0.09 3,750 $ 19.96 76903 0.07 3,001 $ 3.00 76903 0.09 3,750 $ 32.71 76903 0.09 3,750 $ 16.01 76902 0.09 3,750 $ 10.76 76902 0.09 3,750 $ 9.93 76903 0.15 6,500 $ 1.40 76902 0.02 1,000 $ 76903 0.17 7,500 $ 3.00 76905 0.05 2,010 $ 23.43 76904 0.10 4,385 $ 15.99 76859 0.09 3,896 $ 24.69 76903 0.06 2,590 $ 17.07 44
- 187. Restaurant Infill Zone Parcels MapID 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 Tax ID 2341700013001700 2341700013001600 2341700013000200 2341700013000300 2341700013000100 2341700008002900 2341700008002800 2341700008001500 2341700008001400 2341700008001350 2341700008001300 2341700008001100 2341700008001200 2341700008000100 2341700008000200 4076110000000100 4076110000000200 2341700002001600 2341700002001700 2341700002001500 2341700002001150 2341700002001300 2341700002001200 2341700002001400 2341700002000200 2341700002000100 2341700002000400 Total Appraised Value $ 65,400 $ 340,350 $ 273,200 $ 8,800 $ 269,400 $ 126,900 $ 91,500 $ 125,500 $ 34,100 $ 34,600 $ 58,200 $ 161,400 $ 55,700 $ 55,700 $ 145,750 $ 239,900 $ 186,600 $ 3,000 $ 82,800 $ 24,600 $ 52,400 $ 22,000 $ 48,550 $ 27,000 $ 21,100 $ 20,100 $ 91,400 Owner Mohler Buster & Marilyn & Jay Citicorp North America INC Reising Contracting LLC Chadwick Properties Ltd Chadwick Properties Ltd Fuentes John & Elizabeth Strain Michael & Michelle L Jett Robert W & Harris Robert H Lemmons Benjamin David & Ladell Juice Mule Inc Vincent John B & Brandi N Vincent John B & Brandi N Cox Phyllis Cox Phyllis Rufenacht John E & Martha T 7 West Twohig Partnership 7 West Twohig Partnership 7 West Twohig Partnership Wilde Walter W & Joyce M Wilde Walter W & Joyce M Engle Garrick N Dorner Cheryl Stango Stephen P Jr Valva Enterprises LLC Valva Enterprises LLC White Elizabeth Lou P Wilde Joyce Owner Phone Number (800) 788-0002 (817) 488-0077 (325) 651-6326 (325) 651-6326 (325) 658-2430 (325) 655-6615 (325) 658-3434 (325) 658-3434 (325) 944-0967 (325) 651-7744 (325) 651-7744 (325) 655-4495 (325) 659-8999 (325) 651-7744 Owner Street 1 S CHADBOURNE PO BOX 30508 2221 E CONTINENTAL # 140 6002 WINNERS CIR 6002 WINNERS CIR 101 S CHADBOURNE ST 107 S CHADBOURNE 4603 S JACKSON 113 S CHADBOURNE 1649 BECKER LANE 5102 BEVERLY DR 5102 BEVERLY DR 123 S CHADBOURNE 123 S CHADBOURNE 3939 HATCHERY ROAD 201 S CHADBOURNE 201 S CHADBOURNE 201 S CHADBOURNE 20 E CONCHO 20 E CONCHO 4325 GOODNIGHT TRAIL 219 S CHADBOURNE ST 221 S Chadbourn ST 3435 CEDAR RIDGE LANE 3435 CEDAR RIDGE LANE PO BOX 62116 20 E CONCHO Owner City SAN ANGELO TAMPA SOUTHLAKE SAN ANGELO SAN ANGELO SAN ANGELO SAN ANGELO SAN ANGELO SAN ANGELO SAN ANGELO SAN ANGELO SAN ANGELO SAN ANGELO SAN ANGELO SAN ANGELO SAN ANGELO SAN ANGELO SAN ANGELO SAN ANGELO SAN ANGELO SAN ANGELO SAN ANGELO SAN ANGELO SAN ANGELO SAN ANGELO SAN ANGELO SAN ANGELO Owner State TX FL TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX Sources: City of San Angelo,Tom Green Appraisal District, Catalyst Owner Zip Acreage SF $ / SF 76903 0.13 5,600 $ 11.68 33630 0.63 27,651 $ 12.31 76092 0.56 24,405 $ 11.19 76904 0.06 2,500 $ 3.52 76904 0.25 11,000 $ 24.49 76903 0.12 5,331 $ 23.81 76903 0.11 4,671 $ 19.59 76903 0.23 10,001 $ 12.55 76903 0.06 2,500 $ 13.64 76904 0.06 2,500 $ 13.84 76904 0.09 4,000 $ 14.55 76904 0.21 9,126 $ 17.69 76903 0.06 2,500 $ 22.28 76903 0.06 2,500 $ 22.28 76903 0.17 7,501 $ 19.43 76903 0.23 9,977 $ 24.04 76903 0.23 9,977 $ 18.70 76903 0.14 6,043 $ 0.50 76903 0.11 5,000 $ 16.56 76903 0.11 4,612 $ 5.33 76903 0.05 2,000 $ 26.20 76903 0.05 2,001 $ 11.00 76903 0.10 4,210 $ 11.53 76904 0.05 2,075 $ 13.01 76904 0.04 1,590 $ 13.27 76906 0.24 10,625 $ 1.89 76903 0.49 21,561 $ 4.24 45
- 188. The yellow circlesindicate opportunities for lower density and light industrial infill potential for new energy sector uses. The orange circle is better suited for medium density office uses, including and not limited to medical uses. add to a stronger workplace experience. These efforts should be economically incentivized to achieve initial catalytic investment. Investment Concept 2: Workplace Infill The City of San Angelo, in conjunction with the Chamber of Commerce and Downtown San Angelo Inc, should prepare a small business action plan that aims to provide certain amenities special to downtown employment uses that decrease operating expenses, increase efficiency, and Sources: ESRI, City of San Angelo, National Register of Historic Place, City of San Angelo Historic Preservation Society,Tom Green Appraisal District, Catalyst 46
- 189. Shannon Medical Area 25 2 Parcels 3 4 1 AppraisalDistrict Parcels 10 7 12 27 18 19 20 29 30 50 55 57 62 33 32 31 41 40 39 34 59 58 61 reflects all the adjacent parcels to the medical center, which may be best used for office and health science uses. These are presented for informational and programming purposes only and should not be considered mandates for redevelopment or acquisition. 38 37 43 42 54 48 53 • This Shannon Medical District Map 36 35 14 51 28 21 17 16 15 Summary Notes: 26 6 11 13 23 24 22 5 8 9 Workplace Infill Concept -- Shannon Medical Center District 44 46 65 64 • Please refer to the following pages 66 and note the map ID to cross reference parcels with ownership data. 45 63 47 72 69 70 71 68 67 73 74 75 76 79 77 81 83 91 78 µ 92 89 90 84 85 82 88 86 87 0 215 430 860 Feet Source: Esri, i-cubed, USDA, USGS, AEX, GeoEye, Getmapping, Aerogrid, IGN, IGP, and the GIS User Community, Copyright:© 2012 Esri, DeLorme, NAVTEQ, TomTom Sources: ESRI, City of San Angelo,Tom Green Appraisal District, Catalyst 47
- 190. Workplace Infill Concept --Shannon Medical Center District Map ID 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 Tax ID 1934300003300400 2546700000200300 2546700000200500 2546700000200700 2546700000200800 2546700000200900 2546700000200600 1934300003200100 1934300003200200 1934300003100200 1934300003200100 1934300003100100 2341700022501000 2341700022500900 2341700022500800 2341700022500500 2341700022500400 2341700022500300 2341700022500200 2341700022500100 2343180000100100 2341700021501200 2341700021501100 2341700021501000 2341700021500900 2341700021500800 2341700021500700 2341700021500600 2341700021000100 2341700021000200 2341700021000300 2341700021000400 Total Appraised Value $ $ $ 118,300 $ 53,100 $ 19,300 $ $ $ $ 42,600 $ $ $ $ $ 33,000 $ $ $ $ 18,000 $ 15,000 $ 18,750 $ 1,292,400 $ 26,900 $ 12,950 $ 14,600 $ 40,800 $ 24,900 $ 72,500 $ 42,300 $ $ $ 113,700 $ - Owner SAN ANGELO ISD FRIENDS OF RECOVERY INC POLK TERRY D & MARY DARLENE BOWLES JOE H SHANNON REAL ESTATE SERVICES SHANNON REAL ESTATE SERVICES SHANNON REAL ESTATE SERVICES SHANNON REAL ESTATE SERVICES SHANNON REAL ESTATE SERVICES SHANNON REAL ESTATE SERVICES SHANNON REAL ESTATE SERVICES SHANNON REAL ESTATE SERVICES SHANNON REAL ESTATE SERVICES FIRST CHRISTIAN CHURCH SHANNON REAL ESTATE SERVICES SHANNON REAL ESTATE SERVICES SHANNON REAL ESTATE SERVICES SHANNON REAL ESTATE SERVICES L & D FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP L & D FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP SHANNON REAL ESTATE SERVICES MARTINEZ ARMANDO G STEPHENSON MARVIN B BAUTISTA RUDY C JR & JEANNIE BAUTISTA RUDY C JR MIRANDA RICHARD N & MICHELLE C MIRANDA RICHARD N & MICHELLE C CABRERA YOLANDA & PARRA JOHNNY SHANNON MEDICAL CENTER SHANNON MEDICAL CENTER SAN ANGELO NEUROSURGICAL ASSN SHANNON REAL ESTATE SERVICES Owner Phone Number Owner Street (325) 947-3838 1621 University Ave (325) 657-0016 Po Box 250 N Magdalen 221 N Magdalen St 215 N Magdalen St (325) 481-6080 120 E Harris Ave (325) 481-6080 120 E Harris Ave (325) 481-6080 120 E Harris Ave (325) 481-6080 120 E Harris Ave (325) 481-6080 120 E Harris Ave (325) 481-6080 120 E Harris Ave (325) 481-6080 120 E Harris Ave (325) 481-6080 120 E Harris Ave (325) 481-6080 120 E Harris Ave (325) 653-4523 29 N Oakes St (325) 481-6080 120 E Harris Ave (325) 481-6080 120 E Harris Ave (325) 481-6080 120 E Harris Ave (325) 481-6080 120 E Harris Ave 1512 Darlene Dr 1512 Darlene Dr (325) 481-6080 120 E Harris Ave (325) 653-5640 215 W Avenue N 1823 Edmund Blvd 123 N Main E Harris 123 N Main 107 N Main St 107 N Main St 915 Preusser (325) 481-6080 120 E Harris Ave (325) 481-6080 120 E Harris Ave (325) 655-4164 211 E College Ave (325) 481-6080 120 E Harris Ave Owner City SAN ANGELO SAN ANGELO SAN ANGELO SAN ANGELO SAN ANGELO SAN ANGELO SAN ANGELO SAN ANGELO SAN ANGELO SAN ANGELO SAN ANGELO SAN ANGELO SAN ANGELO SAN ANGELO SAN ANGELO SAN ANGELO SAN ANGELO SAN ANGELO SAN ANGELO SAN ANGELO SAN ANGELO SAN ANGELO SAN ANGELO SAN ANGELO SAN ANGELO SAN ANGELO SAN ANGELO SAN ANGELO SAN ANGELO SAN ANGELO SAN ANGELO SAN ANGELO Sources: City of San Angelo,Tom Green Appraisal District, Catalyst Owner State Owner Zip Acreage SF $ / SF TX 76904 0.80 34,711 $ TX 76902 0.75 32,529 $ TX 76903 0.20 8,644 $ 596,137.39 TX 76903 0.18 8,050 $ 287,326.19 TX 76902 0.37 16,108 $ 52,190.37 TX 76902 0.43 18,733 $ TX 76902 0.48 20,910 $ TX 76902 0.27 11,573 $ TX 76903 0.73 31,949 $ 58,081.97 TX 76902 0.54 23,434 $ TX 76902 0.07 3,047 $ TX 76902 0.35 15,128 $ TX 76902 0.30 13,211 $ TX 76903 0.25 11,000 $ 130,676.38 TX 76902 0.33 14,429 $ TX 76902 0.77 33,495 $ TX 76902 0.31 13,363 $ TX 76902 0.21 9,000 $ 87,117.77 TX 76904 0.17 7,500 $ 87,117.64 TX 76904 0.17 7,500 $ 108,897.05 TX 76902 3.88 168,957 $ 333,203.36 TX 76903 0.17 7,277 $ 161,024.76 TX 76901 0.21 9,085 $ 62,089.81 TX 76903 0.17 7,241 $ 87,825.48 TX 76903 0.16 7,007 $ 253,634.83 TX 76903 0.26 11,187 $ 96,956.79 TX 76901 0.18 7,705 $ 409,869.33 TX 76903 0.21 9,154 $ 201,291.94 TX 76902 0.33 14,484 $ TX 76902 0.25 11,007 $ TX 76903 0.23 10,157 $ 487,618.22 TX 76902 0.24 10,350 $ - 48
- 191. Workplace Infill Concept --Shannon Medical Center District Map ID 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 Tax ID 2341700021000500 2341700021000600 2341700021000900 2341700021500100 2341700021000700 2341700021500300 2341700021001800 2341700021001600 2341700021001500 2341700021001200 2341700021001000 2341700021001100 2343180001400100 2341700015000600 2343180001500200 2342000800001100 2342000800001000 2342000800000900 2342000800000800 2342000800000700 2342000800001200 2342000800001600 2342000800000600 2342000800000500 2342000800000400 2342000800002100 2342000800001400 2342000800001300 2342000800000300 2342000800000200 2342000800000100 2342000800001900 Total Appraised Value $ 20,600 $ 26,250 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 211,300 $ 20,300 $ 113,950 $ $ 75,250 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ - Owner SAN ANGELO NEUROSURGICAL ASSN SAN ANGELO NEUROSURGICAL ASSN SHANNON REAL ESTATE SERVICES SHANNON REAL ESTATE SERVICES SHANNON REAL ESTATE SERVICES SHANNON REAL ESTATE SERVICES SHANNON REAL ESTATE SERVICES SHANNON REAL ESTATE SERVICES SHANNON REAL ESTATE SERVICES INC SHANNON REAL ESTATE SERVICES INC SANCHEZ MARIO & DALIA REGAL OIL INC SHANNON MEDICAL CENTER WINGER MARK SHANNON MEDICAL CENTER FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH OF SAN ANGELO FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH OF SAN ANGELO FIRST CHRISTIAN CHURCH-SAN ANGELO FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH SAN ANGELO INC FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH SAN ANGELO INC FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH OF SAN ANGELO FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH SAN ANGELO INC FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH TRUSTEES FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH TRUSTEES FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH Owner Phone Number (325) 655-4164 (325) 655-4164 (325) 481-6080 (325) 481-6080 (325) 481-6080 (325) 481-6080 (325) 481-6080 (325) 481-6080 (325) 481-6080 (325) 481-6080 (325) 658-7521 (325) 481-6080 (325) 655-8374 (325) 481-6080 (325) 655-4101 (325) 655-4101 (325) 655-4101 (325) 655-4101 (325) 655-4101 (325) 655-4101 (325) 655-4101 (325) 655-4101 (325) 655-4101 (325) 655-4101 (325) 655-4101 (325) 655-4101 (325) 655-4101 (325) 655-4101 (325) 655-4101 (325) 655-4101 (325) 655-4101 Owner Street 211 E College Ave 211 E College Ave 120 E Harris Ave 120 E Harris Ave 120 E Harris Ave 120 E Harris Ave 120 E Harris Ave 120 E Harris Ave 120 E Harris Ave 120 E Harris Ave 232 Copperwood Dr Po Box 950 N Main 120 E Harris Ave Po Box 60226 E Harris 120 E Harris Ave 37 E Harris 37 E Harris 37 E Harris 37 E Harris 37 E Harris 37 E Harris 37 E Harris 37 E Harris 37 E Harris 37 E Harris 37 E Harris 37 E Harris 37 E Harris 37 E Harris 37 E Harris 37 E Harris 37 E Harris Owner City SAN ANGELO SAN ANGELO SAN ANGELO SAN ANGELO SAN ANGELO SAN ANGELO SAN ANGELO SAN ANGELO SAN ANGELO SAN ANGELO LAKESIDE SAN ANGELO SAN ANGELO SAN ANGELO SAN ANGELO SAN ANGELO SAN ANGELO SAN ANGELO SAN ANGELO SAN ANGELO SAN ANGELO SAN ANGELO SAN ANGELO SAN ANGELO SAN ANGELO SAN ANGELO SAN ANGELO SAN ANGELO SAN ANGELO SAN ANGELO SAN ANGELO SAN ANGELO Sources: City of San Angelo,Tom Green Appraisal District, Catalyst Owner State Owner Zip Acreage SF TX 76903 0.18 7,687 $ TX 76903 0.22 9,564 $ TX 76902 0.28 12,388 $ TX 76902 0.21 9,316 $ TX 76902 0.14 6,300 $ TX 76902 0.06 2,477 $ TX 76902 0.68 29,435 $ TX 76902 0.44 18,999 $ TX 76902 0.44 18,999 $ TX 76902 0.44 18,999 $ TX 76108 0.08 3,432 $ TX 76902 0.29 12,727 $ TX 76902 2.49 108,352 $ TX 76906 0.37 16,160 $ TX 76902 0.27 11,709 $ TX 76903 0.10 4,167 $ TX 76903 0.05 2,083 $ TX 76903 0.05 2,083 $ TX 76903 0.05 2,083 $ TX 76903 0.08 3,542 $ TX 76903 0.19 8,264 $ TX 76903 1.77 77,224 $ TX 76903 0.10 4,167 $ TX 76903 0.05 2,375 $ TX 76903 0.05 2,375 $ TX 76903 0.08 3,461 $ TX 76903 0.05 2,000 $ TX 76903 0.01 622 $ TX 76903 0.09 3,834 $ TX 76903 0.08 3,666 $ TX 76903 0.34 14,999 $ TX 76903 0.67 29,000 $ 49 $ / SF 116,737.10 119,561.98 484,467.50 257,675.67 390,022.20 202,842.50 -
- 192. Workplace Infill Concept --Shannon Medical Center District Map ID 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 Tax ID 2342000800001800 2342000800001700 2341800600000600 2341800600000200 2341800600000300 2341800600000700 2341800600000800 2341800600000900 2341800600001800 2341800600001600 2341800600001700 2341800600001000 2341700006001500 2341700006001800 2341700006001400 2341700006001300 2341700006001200 2341700006001100 2341700006001000 2341700006001900 2341700006000100 2341700006000200 2341700006000300 2341700006000400 2341700006000500 2341700006000600 2341700006000900 2341700006000700 Total Appraised Value $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 115,450 $ $ 20,800 $ 159,400 $ 234,100 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 38,300 $ $ $ $ $ 165,600 Owner FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH TALLEY PATRICIA B FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH ESTES & SIDENER LEASING CO ANGELO REALTY PARTNERS LTD ESTES & SIDENER LEASING CO ROMAN CATHOLIC DIOCESE - SAN ANGELO FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH ROMAN CATHOLIC DIOCESE - SAN ANGELO SHANNON REAL ESTATE SERVICES SHANNON REAL ESTATE SERVICES SHANNON REAL ESTATE SERVICES SHANNON REAL ESTATE SERVICES SHANNON REAL ESTATE SERVICES SHANNON REAL ESTATE SERVICES INC MASONIC LODGE SHANNON REAL ESTATE SERVICES WADE WILLIAM C SHANNON REAL ESTATE SERVICES SHANNON REAL ESTATE SERVICES SHANNON REAL ESTATE SERVICES SHANNON REAL ESTATE SERVICES FOX FISH & SABLE REALTY CORP Owner Phone Number (325) 655-4101 (325) 655-4101 (325) 655-4101 (325) 655-4101 (325) 655-4101 (325) 655-4101 (325) 655-4101 (325) 655-6936 (325) 655-6936 (325) 651-7500 (325) 655-8981 (325) 651-7500 (325) 481-6080 (325) 481-6080 (325) 481-6080 (325) 481-6080 (325) 481-6080 (325) 481-6080 (325) 655-3790 (325) 481-6080 (325) 481-6080 (325) 481-6080 (325) 481-6080 (325) 481-6080 Owner Street 37 E Harris 37 E Harris 37 E Harris 37 E Harris 37 E Harris 37 E Harris 3706 Inglewood Dr Po Box 2138 16 E Beauregard Po Box 5891 E Beauregard 16 E Beauregard Po Box 1829 S Oakes 37 E Beauregard Ave Po Box 1829 S Oakes 120 E Harris Ave 120 E Harris Ave 120 E Harris Ave 120 E Harris Ave 120 E Harris Ave 120 E Harris Ave 130 S Oakes St 120 E Harris Ave Po Box 224 E Twohig 120 E Harris Ave 120 E Harris Ave 120 E Harris Ave 120 E Harris Ave 100 Bramble Brook Rd Owner City SAN ANGELO SAN ANGELO SAN ANGELO SAN ANGELO SAN ANGELO SAN ANGELO SAN ANGELO SAN ANGELO SAN ANGELO SAN ANGELO SAN ANGELO SAN ANGELO SAN ANGELO SAN ANGELO SAN ANGELO SAN ANGELO SAN ANGELO SAN ANGELO SAN ANGELO SAN ANGELO SAN ANGELO SAN ANGELO LAKE JACKSON SAN ANGELO SAN ANGELO SAN ANGELO SAN ANGELO ARDSLEY Sources: City of San Angelo,Tom Green Appraisal District, Catalyst Owner State Owner Zip Acreage TX 76903 0.52 TX 76903 0.31 TX 76903 0.03 TX 76903 0.00 TX 76903 0.00 TX 76903 0.11 TX 76904 0.33 TX 76902 1.12 TX 76903 0.13 TX 76902 0.10 TX 76903 0.10 TX 76902 1.31 TX 76903 0.72 TX 76902 0.10 TX 76902 0.21 TX 76902 0.21 TX 76902 0.21 TX 76902 0.21 TX 76902 0.41 TX 76902 0.49 TX 76903 0.23 TX 76902 0.13 TX 77566 0.18 TX 76902 0.25 TX 76902 0.21 TX 76902 0.34 TX 76902 0.11 NY 10502 0.34 50 SF 22,501 13,500 1,250 188 188 4,750 14,250 48,926 5,663 4,279 4,309 57,002 31,501 4,500 9,000 9,000 9,000 9,000 18,000 21,502 10,000 5,500 8,000 11,001 9,000 15,001 5,001 15,002 $ / SF $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 352,903.87 $ $ 160,003.79 $ 1,622,728.95 $ 2,366,602.72 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 208,535.07 $ $ $ $ $ 480,839.43
- 193. The yellow circlehighlights lower density housing opportunities that can leverage the nearby cultural and historic amenities towards the creation of a more vibrant in-town community. The orange circle highlights medium density housing opportunities around the Concho River that can leverage this riverfront location to better connect downtown to the Arts and Historic District, provide new gateways into Downtown, and create a stronger Concho River zone. These efforts should be economically incentivized to achieve initial catalytic investment. All developments should be designed to enhance the historic, cultural, and community features of the adjacent areas. Sources: ESRI, City of San Angelo, National Register of Historic Place, City of San Angelo Historic Preservation Society,Tom Green Appraisal District, Catalyst Investment Concept 3: Residential Infill 51
- 194. Residential Infill Zone --Concho Riverfront Concho River Area Summary Notes: Parcels Appraisal District Parcels • This Concho River District map Oakes St shows potential development areas for medium density housing. These are presented for informational and programming purposes only and should not be considered mandates for redevelopment or acquisition. 33 32 31 25 44 43 30 29 42 39 28 24 23 41 • Please refer to the following pages 40 38 27 22 45 and note the map ID to cross reference parcels with ownership data. 37 35 36 21 26 34 • These efforts should be economically incentivized to achieve initial catalytic investment. 6 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 9 10 11 13 12 14 15 16 17 Ave n ue A 20 18 19 µ 0 225 450 900 Feet Source: Esri, i-cubed, USDA, USGS, AEX, GeoEye, Getmapping, Aerogrid, IGN, IGP, and the GIS User Community, Copyright:© 2012 Esri, DeLorme, NAVTEQ, TomTom Sources: ESRI, City of San Angelo,Tom Green Appraisal District, Catalyst 52
- 195. Residential Infill Zone --Concho Riverfront Summary Notes: G • Properties fronting the Concho River are ideally located to allow the creation of a medium density residential community with direct access to Downtown’s retail, restaurant and cultural user core, near the City’s employment anchors, and focused on strengthening the riverfront experience. E F D • Development on both sides of the B A C2 river will leverage the City’s recent investments in the nearby public spaces and artwork, will provide pleasant views both to and from downtown, and provide a critical mass of ongoing residents that will further support downtown businesses. C B2 Sources: ESRI, City of San Angelo, ,Catalyst 53
- 196. Residential Infill Zone --Concho Riverfront Summary Notes: • This bird’s eye view of anticipated improvements is taken from a viewpoint just east of the Art Museum looking northwest across the Concho River area. It shows the intent to deliver an urban experience to this important area in a manner that better connects the City’s art and historic resources to the downtown retail and restaurant core through a residential riverfront. Sources: ESRI, City of San Angelo, ,Catalyst 54
- 197. Residential Infill Zone --Concho Riverfront Total Appraised Value $ 45,445 $ 47,518 $ 49,569 $ 51,373 $ 81,052 $ 274,958 6 2036900004801100 $ (1.13 acres) $ 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 2036900004801000 2036900004800100 2036900004800200 2036900004800300 2036900004800400 2036900004800500 2036900004800600 2036900004800700 2036900004800800 2036900004800900 D C B1 Tax ID 1123200004700100 1123200004700200 1123200004700300 1123200004700400 2443210004700100 B2 A Map ID 1 2 3 4 5 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Owner SAN ANGELO HEALTH FOUNDATION SAN ANGELO HEALTH FOUNDATION SAN ANGELO HEALTH FOUNDATION SAN ANGELO HEALTH FOUNDATION SAN ANGELO HEALTH FOUNDATION 73,127 SAN ANGELO HEALTH FOUNDATION 73,127 66,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 38,000 17,750 19,600 8,200 174,551 MAYFIELD PAPER CO SAN ANGELO HEALTH FOUNDATION SAN ANGELO HEALTH FOUNDATION SAN ANGELO HEALTH FOUNDATION SAN ANGELO HEALTH FOUNDATION SAN ANGELO HEALTH FOUNDATION SINSEL THOMAS SINSEL THOMAS FARRIS W B III & JANICE Y WILLIAMS VILLARREAL LP Owner Phone Number (325) 486-0185 (325) 486-0185 (325) 486-0185 (325) 486-0185 (325) 486-0185 Owner Street PO BOX 3550 W AVENUE A PO BOX 3550 W AVENUE A PO BOX 3550 W AVENUE A 426 W AVE B 426 W AVE B Owner City SAN ANGELO SAN ANGELO SAN ANGELO SAN ANGELO SAN ANGELO Owner State TX TX TX TX TX (325) 486-0185 419 S IRVING SAN ANGELO (325) 653-1444 (325) 486-0185 (325) 486-0185 (325) 486-0185 (325) 486-0185 (325) 486-0185 PO BOX 3889 W Avenue A 419 S IRVING 419 S IRVING 419 S IRVING 419 S IRVING 419 S IRVING PO BOX 2064 S Irving PO BOX 2064 S Irving 5362 ATLANTIC RD 1500 RANKIN HWY Owner Zip 76902 76902 76902 76903 76903 Acreage 0.5216377 0.5454315 0.5689783 0.5896799 0.9303544 3.1560819 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ / SF 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 TX 76903 0.8393819 36563.47 $ 0.8393819 36563.47 $ 2.00 2.00 SAN ANGELO SAN ANGELO SAN ANGELO SAN ANGELO SAN ANGELO SAN ANGELO AUSTIN AUSTIN SAN ANGELO MIDLAND TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX 76902 76903 76903 76903 76903 76903 78768 78768 76903 79701 0.4958851 0.0573938 0.057394 0.0573933 0.057394 0.057394 0.0573936 0.1147875 0.1147875 0.1079887 1.1778114 SF 22722.54 23759 24784.69 25686.46 40526.24 137478.9 21600.75 2500.073 2500.083 2500.051 2500.083 2500.081 2500.064 5000.143 5000.143 4703.989 51305.46 $ 3.06 $ 2.00 $ 2.00 $ 2.00 $ 2.00 $ 2.00 $ 15.20 $ 3.55 $ 3.92 $ 1.74 $ 3.40 17 18 313400000000600 $ 313400000000350 $ 420,600 BAYOU CITY BROADCASTING LLC 7,300 BAYOU CITY BROADCASTING LLC (281) 719-9355 (281) 719-9355 406 S IRVING 406 S IRVING SAN ANGELO SAN ANGELO TX TX 76903 0.5393414 23493.71 $ 17.90 76903 0.0953468 4153.308 $ 1.76 19 20 313400000000300 $ 313400000000500 $ $ 98,500 GRIFFIN FRED L 275,787 CITY OF SAN ANGELO 802,187 (325) 486-8661 (325) 657-4241 434 S IRVING ST SAN ANGELO PO BOX 1751 S CHADBOURNE SAN ANGELO TX TX 76903 0.5060592 22043.94 $ 76902 3.1656046 137893.7 $ 4.306352 187584.7 $ 4.47 2.00 4.28 43,000 48,350 35,300 20,100 146,750 (972) 233-1566 (972) 233-1566 119 S IRVING 119 S IRVING 909 CHESTNUT ST RM 36-M-1 909 CHESTNUT ST RM 36-M-1 TX TX MO MO 76903 0.223836 9750.294 $ 76903 0.3214049 14000.4 $ 63101 0.3730598 16250.48 $ 63101 0.2008783 8750.257 $ 1.1191789 48751.43 $ 4.41 3.45 2.17 2.30 3.01 21 22 23 24 2341600000000100 2341700200000400 2341700200000500 2341700200000600 $ $ $ $ $ 333 CHADBOURNE LLC 333 CHADBOURNE LLC A T & T COMMUNICATIONS OF TEXAS LTD A T & T COMMUNICATIONS OF TEXAS LTD SAN ANGELO SAN ANGELO ST LOUIS ST LOUIS Sources: City of San Angelo,Tom Green Appraisal District, Catalyst 55
- 198. Owner Phone Number (325)655-9553 Owner Street 29 E CONCHO AVE Owner City SAN ANGELO Owner State TX F Map ID 25 26 27 28 29 2341700300000100 2341700300000200 2341700300000500 2341700300000600 $ $ $ $ $ 30,824 255,993 123,844 31,681 442,342 CITY OF SAN ANGELO - TRUSTEE CITY OF SAN ANGELO FREEDOM FELLOWSHIP SAN ANGELO INC CITY OF SAN ANGELO (325) 657-4241 (325) 657-4241 (325) 227-4121 (325) 657-4241 PO BOX 1751 S CHADBOURNE PO BOX 1751 S CHADBOURNE 6018 LYNDHURST DR PO BOX 1751 SAN ANGELO SAN ANGELO SAN ANGELO SAN ANGELO TX TX TX TX 76902 76902 76901 76902 0.3538161 2.9383931 1.4215298 0.3636504 5.0773894 15412.23 127996.4 61921.84 15840.61 221171.1 $ $ $ $ $ 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 30 31 32 33 2341700400000100 2341700400000400 2341700400000500 2341700400000200 $ $ $ $ $ 161,631 29,000 500 412,500 603,631 CITY OF SAN ANGELO EGGEMEYER BOBBY CONCHO CROSSING ELCO LLC (325) 657-4241 (325) 655-1166 (325) 653-1154 (325) 655-8933 PO BOX 1751 S CHADBOURNE 35 E CONCHO 1500 SHAFTER 5950 US HIGHWAY 87 N SAN ANGELO SAN ANGELO SAN ANGELO SAN ANGELO TX TX TX TX 76902 76903 76901 76901 1.8552729 0.3236413 0.0359937 1.5135776 3.7284855 80815.69 14097.81 1567.885 65931.44 162412.8 $ $ $ $ $ 2.00 2.06 0.32 6.26 3.72 34 35 36 37 38 39 1323500000000100 1323500000000200 1323500000000400 1323500000000300 1323500000000500 1323500000000700 $ $ $ $ $ $ 48,400 51,950 7,700 10,100 27,000 6,000 EGGEMEYER BOBBY Harrison O D III & Ronny Et Al Harrison O D III & Ronny Et Al Gilman Donald M & Norma Braden Gilman Donald M & Norma Braden Gilman Donald M & Norma Braden (325) 655-1166 (325) 944-3089 (325) 944-3089 (325) 658-1071 (325) 658-1071 (325) 658-1071 350 S OAKES ST 2200 DOUGLAS DR 2200 DOUGLAS DR 140 ALLEN 140 ALLEN 140 ALLEN SAN ANGELO SAN ANGELO SAN ANGELO SAN ANGELO SAN ANGELO SAN ANGELO TX TX TX TX TX TX 76903 76904 76904 76903 76903 76903 0.6240004 0.2538816 0.0787663 0.279263 0.7891944 0.2698764 27181.46 11059.08 3431.062 12164.7 34377.31 11755.82 $ $ $ $ $ $ 1.78 4.70 2.24 0.83 0.79 0.51 40 41 42 43 44 45 1323500000000600 1323500000000800 1323500000000900 1323500000001000 1323500000001100 1323500000001200 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 54,400 60,300 68,700 62,350 3,298 10,000 410,198 Gilman Donald & Norma Gilman Donald & Norma Gilman Donald M & Norma Alvarado Evelyn City Of San Angelo Johnson Mark A & Eustis Stevan D (325) 658-1071 (325) 658-1071 (325) 658-1071 (325) 658-9015 (325) 657-4241 (325) 482-8610 140 ALLEN 140 ALLEN 140 ALLEN 8077 WILLOW LANE PO BOX 1751 S CHADBOURNE PO BOX 5898 ALLEN SAN ANGELO SAN ANGELO SAN ANGELO SAN ANGELO SAN ANGELO BROWNSVILLE TX TX TX TX TX TX 76903 76903 76903 76901 76902 78523 0.1147874 0.4722845 0.8183273 0.6623058 0.037856 0.9635322 5.3640755 5000.14 20572.71 35646.34 28850.04 1649.009 41971.46 233659.1 $ 10.88 $ 2.93 $ 1.93 $ 2.16 $ 2.00 $ 0.24 $ 1.76 H E Tax ID Total Appraised Value Owner 2341700300000700 $ 219,050 COOPER RAYMOND L & FAYE $ 219,050 G Residential Infill Zone -- Concho Riverfront Owner Zip Acreage SF $ / SF 76903 0.6887244 30000.84 $ 7.30 0.6887244 30000.84 $ 7.30 Note: All yellow highlighted figures do not have tax rates. They each assume a land value of $2.00/sf. Sources: City of San Angelo,Tom Green Appraisal District, Catalyst 56
- 199. The following representsavailable finance tools that have been successfully utilized by other Texas communities in the redevelopment of target areas. Each of these programs should be studied further to determine their applicability to creating a stronger Downtown San Angelo. Public Financing - State Low Income Housing Tax Credits Historic Rehabilitation Tax Credits Community Development Tax Community Development Assistance (CDA) Economic Development Tools Public Financing - Local Tax Increment Financing Land Donation/Write-Down Industrial Development Program (NIFA) Development Fee Rebates Infrastructure Cost Participation Sales Tax Sharing Low Interest Loans / Subordination Property Tax Abatement Tax Exempt Financing Leveraged Infrastructure Funding Façade Maintenance Loan Program Predevelopment Funding Grants Encourage and Support Nonprofit Developers Public Financing - Federal Fed. Historic Pres. Invest. Tax Credits Community Development Block Grant Job Training Partnership Act (JTPA) Economic Development Administration (EDA) • Financing tools include Public and Private Financing Private Equity Private Debt Lending Pools - Shared Risk Community Reinvestment Act Land Donation (Quasi) Public Improvement District (PID) HUD 221(d)(4) CDBG Section 108 New Markets Tax Credits • Private financing can help fill in Image and Text Sources: Google Earth ,Catalyst Summary Notes: Private options. • Public options include local, state, and federal sources. the gaps, and allow for additional investment dollars to the area. • Debt is available, as long as there is a match in equity. 57
- 200. Downtown San Angelo,through strategic planning, policy, Partnerships made between the City of San Angelo, the and financing efforts, is positioned to leverage the current Chamber of Commerce, Downtown San Angelo Inc., Hiseconomic climate into a positive redevelopment strategy. toric San Angelo, local businesses, and the private sector should be made to facilitate new development that can Such redevelopment efforts should be targeted towards strengthen Downtown as a mixed-use and mixed-activity specific investments and focus areas. This analysis suggests regional destination that is active in the daytime through these efforts be particular to inducing restaurant, energy- the night-time. sector employment, and new housing over the next 10 years. Sources: ESRI, City of San Angelo,Tom Green Appraisal District, Catalyst Conclusion 58
- 201. City of SanAngelo Memo Meeting Date: December 17, 2013 To: Mayor and Council members From: AJ Fawver, AICP, Interim Director or Development Services Subject: consider petition for possible annexation (to San Angelo’s City limits) of certain property situated in southwest San Angelo Location: area encompassing a 4 acre tract extending southwest from Southland Boulevard and located directly east of an 8.995 acre tract annexed to the City Limits on March 5, 2013 that comprises the Prestonwood Addition, Section Two in the southwest part of the city, as shown in attached exhibit Contacts: AJ Fawver, AICP Interim Director of Development Services 657-4210 Caption: Discussion and consideration of petition seeking annexation (to San Angelo’s City limits) of certain property situated directly north, south, east and west of San Angelo and encompassing a vacant 4 acre tract extending southwest from Southland Boulevard and located directly east of an 8.995 acre tract annexed to the City Limits on March 5, 2013 that comprised the Prestonwood Addition, Section Two. Summary: The City staff recommends that, if the City Council chooses to accept the petition for annexing all 4 acres highlighted on the attached map, that the City Council also adopt the attached draft timetable for completing such annexation.
- 202. City staff waspresented with a petition for annexation of the property described above and specifically shown in the attached exhibits. A copy of the petition is also included within the exhibits. The property in question is entirely vacant, uninhabited and free of any structures. It is situated adjacent to annexed property on all sides. This includes Southland Boulevard, which bounds the property to the east, Mills Pass Drive, located adjacent south/southeast of the subject property, a growing residential subdivision known as the Prestonwood Addition, Section 2, Lots 1-8 to the west, northwest, and the Community of Faith subdivision, Section 1, Block 1, Lot 1, to the north/northeast. On March 5, 2013 an 8.995 acre tract comprising what is known as the Prestonwood Addition Section Two, was annexed into the City Limits. This is relevant because when the annexation petition was first presented to City Council on April 2, 2013, a general discussion was held during this meeting with regard to the subject property currently petitioning for annexation as it represented a tract of unincorporated land surrounded by annexed property. The question of whether the owner would be willing to annex the property was asked. Planning staff was then directed to approach the landowner regarding the annexation process since it was explained during the meeting that a City-initiated petition would be a longer and more extensive process. By accepting the petition and adopting a calendar of annexation proceedings as prescribed under Chapter 43 of the Texas Local Government Code, City Council will initiate a process that may be completed as early as March 4, 2014. The Local Government Code authorizes cities to annex sparsely occupied areas on petition of the area's landowner(s). This section (43.028) only applies to the annexation of areas that meet the following criteria: (1) is one-half mile or less in width; (2) is within the ETJ (Extra-Territorial Jurisdiction) of the city; (3) is vacant and without residents, or on which fewer than three qualified voters reside; (4) is contiguous to the annexing city. Analysis of Proposed Annexation: It is essential that the foundation statement of the 2009 Comprehensive Plan be considered in context of considering annexations, specifically that: "Rapid land use expansion and recent annexations have affected the identity of the City and established a new development pattern that is fiscally unsustainable." This Plan provides guidance for annexation, many of which are relevant to this scenario. First, the plan establishes a goal stating that the City should "annex areas before extensive development of home sites and business properties occurs, guiding any such development within a framework of municipal regulations on zoning, subdivision, signs, fire prevention and building construction." This excerpt is relevant in this situation, because the area is vacant, and thus, no such development is in place. However, this argument alone is not compelling enough on its own – annexation of this property given that all contiguous surrounding properties have been annexed so annexation here would therefore ensure
- 203. logical area developmentand could potentially be beneficial for placement of public utilities and avoid possible confusion for emergency responders. Thus, this request represents infill as opposed to annexing land that essentially continues to push City Limits away from the city center, thereby being the first step in ensuring the best use of the land. The Comprehensive Plan goes on to state that it is important to "identify specific areas where...annexation may be useful for incorporating expected new development...within City limits, especially where an infrastructure of water utilities already exists." In this area, a network of water and sewer mains, available for extension, are in existence, serving annexed area properties such as Bonham Elementary School and the Prestonwood Addition, Section One. Financial Impact: not applicable, yet Recommendation: City staff recommends that City Council accept the proposed schedule of hearings as outlined below. Even before those public hearings may begin, the governing body must decide whether to “accept” or “reject” a petition for annexation. Accepting such petition does not commit the governing body to approving any or all of the requested annexation. Accepting such petition simply initiates a series of proceedings which may eventually lead to annexation. These hearings allow the opportunity for input from the public, interested parties, and the petitioner - for consideration by the City Council. annexation calendar (no special meetings needed) first public hearing January 21, 2014 second public hearing February 4, 2014 introduce annexation ordinance, on first reading February 18, 2014 second and final reading of annexation ordinance March 4, 2014 Attachments: legal description as provided by the applicant, of the proposed area labeled “Exhibit A” survey map as provided by the applicant petition as submitted to City staff Presentation: AJ Fawver, Interim Director of Development Services Publication: No legal notice required at this time. However, if City Council agrees to accept this petition, legal notice of required public
- 204. hearings will needto be published (in the newspaper) and posted on the City’s web site.
- 208. City of SanAngelo Office of the City Clerk Memo Date: December 9, 2013 To: Mayor and Councilmembers From: Alicia Ramirez, City Clerk Subject: Agenda Item for December 17, 2013 Council Meeting Contact: Alicia Ramirez, City Clerk, 657-4405 Caption: Regular Agenda RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS, CASTING VOTES FOR ONE NOMINEE OR DISTRIBUTING THEM AMONG NOMINEES FOR A POSITION ON THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TOM GREEN COUNTY APPRAISAL DISTRICT FOR THE JANUARY 1, 2014 THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 2015 TERM OF OFFICE Summary: The nomination and appointment process is set out in Section 6.03 of the State Property Tax Code. Appraisal district board members serve 2 year terms. The current terms of the five board members expire on December 31, 2013. Nominations have been received from the participating governing bodies. The Council may distribute its 1,311 votes in any manner it desires among the 5 nominees. Each Councilmember is allocated 187.2 votes (1/7 of the total 1,311 votes allocated to the City of San Angelo). The Council may also choose to cast all its votes for one candidate or may distribute votes equally among any number of the candidates. There is no provision for write-in candidates. The Council must take action by December 15, 2013 by Resolution on the official ballot. The nominees are: John Begnaud John Conn Russell DeVore Louis P. Gomez Bob Reeves The five newly elected board members will begin serving their two year term of office on January 1, 2014. Financial Impact: None Other Information/Recommendation: Letter dated October 23 and received on November rd 2013 from the Chief Appraiser provides additional information. A historical summary of the City Council nomination process is also included with this cover memo. Attachment: Resolution and Notice
- 213. Minutes October 5, 1993 Page103 Vol. 80 NOMINATION OF CANDIDATES FOR BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF TOM GREEN COUNTY APPRAISAL DISTRICT The City Manager reviewed the background information. Councilwoman Tucker stated that the current directors have performed well. Motion, to nominate Mr. Dick Burnett, Mr. A. H. "Chico" Denis, Mr. John Fuentes, Mr. Walter Pfluger, and Mr. John Phillips as candidates for the Board of Directors of Tom Green County Appraisal District for 199395, was made by Councilman Izzard and seconded by Councilman Hiebert. Motion carried unanimously. Page 158 Vol. 84 Minutes October 3, 1995 ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION NOMINATING CANDIDATES FOR BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF TOM GREEN COUNTY APPRAISAL DISTRICT The Council discussed the function of the board. The City Manager explained the process for selection of the board. Motion, to adopt the resolution nominating Mr. Dick Burnett, Mr. A. H. "Chico" Denis, Mr. John Fuentes, Mr. Walter Pfluger, and Mr. John Phillips for the Board of Directors of the Tom Green County Appraisal District, was made by Councilmember Izzard and seconded by Councilmember Burrows. Motion carried unanimously. Annex F, Page 168, "Resolution" Page 84 Vol. 87 Minutes November 4, 1997 ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION SETTING NUMBER OF VOTES TO BE CAST FOR NOMINEES FOR BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF TOM GREEN COUNTY APPRAISAL DISTRICT FOR 1998-2000 TERM City Clerk Carol Rigby presented the results of each Councilmembers vote. Each Councilmember cast 232.5 votes (1/6 of the 1,395 total votes allocated to the City of San Angelo) among the 6 nominees. Councilmember Shrum cast his votes as follows: Mr. Pfluger - 132.5; Mr. Phillips - 100. Councilmember Burrows cast his votes as follows: Mr. Phillips - 232.5. Councilmember Holguin cast his votes as follows: Mr. Bastardo - 232.5. Councilmember Tucker cast her votes as follows: Mr. Burnett - 232.5. Councilmember Ryon cast her votes as follows: Mr. Bastardo - 46; Mr. Burnett - 46; Mr. Denis - 46; Mr. Pfluger - 46; Mr. Phillips - 48.5. Councilmember Mahon cast his votes as follows: Mr. Fuentes - 77.5; Mr. Pfluger - 77.5; Mr. Phillips - 77.5. Motion, to adopt a resolution setting the number of votes to be cast for nominees for the Board of Directors of the Tom Green County Appraisal District for the 1998-2000 term as follows: Mr. Richard Bastardo - 278.5; Mr. Dick Burnett - 278.5; Mr. A.H. AChico@, III - 46; Mr. John Fuentes - 77.5; Mr. Walter Pfluger - 256; Mr. John Phillips - 458.5, was made by Councilmember Holguin and seconded by Councilmember Burrows. Motion carried unanimously.
- 214. Annex F, Page83, AResolution@ Page 610 Vol. 89 Minutes October 5, 1999 ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION NOMINATING CANDIDATES FOR BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF TOM GREEN COUNTY APPRAISAL DISTRICT City Clerk Kathy Keane presented background information, noting that the Appraisal Board has five members up for reappointment, and Council will need to nominate for these five positions. Ms. Keane further noted that everyone currently serving on the board is eligible for reappointment and willing to serve except Mr. John Fuentes. City Manager Tom Adams noted that this is a two step process. A discussion followed regarding the qualifications needed. Responding to a question from Councilmember Holguin, Ms. Keane noted that Mr. Dean had indicated that Mr. Walter Pfluger and Mr. Louis Gomez had expressed interest in holding these positions. Noting that Mr. Pfluger would be an asset, Councilmember Ryon explained that she had spoken with Mr. Pfluger and she would like to consider him for one of the positions. Councilmembers Shrum and Holguin agreed. Responding to a question from Councilmember Bastardo, Ms. Keane stated that she had not made contact with the Chief Appraiser, but had spoken with Mr. Rusty Dean, the attorney for the Appraisal District, who prepared the Resolution. Noting a possible problem with a Councilmember serving on the Tax Appraisal Board, Councilmember Shrum stated that Louis Gomez was interested as well. Councilmember Shrum further suggested that Mr. Gomez and Mr. Pfluger be substituted for present members John Fuentes and Richard Bastardo. Councilmember Mahon explained that there is a perceived problem with Mr. Bastardo being able to set the tax rate as a member on this board. While this is legally permissible, it is the perception which could be harmful. Councilmember Ryon agreed that this is a problem and questioned if Council should make a rule that Councilmembers can not serve on other boards. Councilmember Shrum noted that some boards have requested City Council representation, however, perception of is the matter of concern. Mr. Adams noted that involvement in certain areas needs to be watched. Councilmember Bastardo noted that it was this Council who voted him in as a member of the Tax Appraisal Board. Mr. Bastardo stated that all the present board members are good people, but explained that he has not been on the board for long and has the time to serve. Serving on the Tax Appraisal Board does not hamper his agenda to stay open-minded and attend all the meetings. Mayor Fender explained that when Council voted to have Mr. Bastardo serve, he was not on the Council
- 215. at the time.Mayor Fender further explained that this is not a personal decision. Councilmember Holguin nominated Councilmember Bastardo. Council discussed how the vote would take place. Each Councilmember will get five votes. An initial vote was taken. The nominees received the following number of votes: Richard Bastardo: 4 votes; Councilmembers Burrows, Holguin, Bastardo and Ryon Dick Burnett: 4 votes; Councilmembers Shrum, Burrows, Holguin and Mahon Chico Dennis: 4 votes; Councilmembers Shrum, Burrows, Ryon and Mahon John Phillips: 4 votes; Councilmembers Shrum, Burrows, Mahon and Mayor Fender Walter Pfluger: 5 votes; Councilmembers Shrum, Burrows, Ryon, Mahon and Mayor Fender Louis Gomez: 4 votes; Councilmembers Shrum, Burrows, Mahon and Mayor Fender Mr. Walter Pfluger was nominated and the Council voted again on the remaining nominees with each Councilmember receiving four votes. The nominees received the following number of votes: Richard Bastardo: 4 votes; Councilmembers Burrows, Holguin, Bastardo and Ryon Dick Burnett: 5 votes; Councilmembers Shrum, Burrows, Holguin, Mahon and Mayor Fender Chico Dennis: 4 votes; Councilmembers Shrum, Ryon, Mahon and Mayor Fender John Phillips: 7 votes; Full Council Louis Gomez: 7 votes; Full Council At this point the following additional persons were nominated: Dick Burnett, John Phillips, and Louis Gomez. Because the number of votes received for Mr. Bastardo and Mr. Dennis were tied, another vote was taken. Richard Bastardo: 3 votes; Councilmembers Burrows, Holguin, and Bastardo Chico Dennis: 4 votes; Councilmembers Shrum, Ryon, Mahon, and Mayor Fender Motion, to adopt a resolution nominating Walter Pfluger, Dick Burnett, John Phillips, Louis Gomez, and Chico Dennis for Board of Directors of the Tom Green County Appraisal District, was made by Councilmember Shrum and seconded by Councilmember Mahon. Aye: Shrum, Mahon, Fender, Burrows, Bastardo, and Ryon. Nay: Holguin. Motion carried 6-1. Annex B, Page 619, AResolution@ Page 400 Vol. 92 Minutes October 2, 2001 ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION NOMINATING CANDIDATES FOR BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF TOM GREEN COUNTY APPRAISAL DISTRICT Responding to questions of Councilmembers Holguin and Wardlaw, City Manager Tom Adams informed that Directors did not have term limits but that the Council was free to nominate their own slate of nominees. He further agreed that future nominations could include information regarding the length of service for each nominee. Motion, to adopt a Resolution nominating candidates for the Board of Directors of the Tom Green County Appraisal District, as presented, was made by Councilmember Mahon and seconded by Councilmember
- 216. Darby. Motion carriedunanimously. Annex C, Page 425, AResolution@ Minutes October 7, 2003 Page 439 Vol. 95 ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION NOMINATING CANDIDATES FOR THE TOM GREEN COUNTY APPRAISAL DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS City Manager Tom Adams presented background information. Responding to the request of Councilmember Holguin to delay the nomination process, Councilmember Bates noted the Resolution nominating candidates was required to be submitted prior to October 15, 2003. By consensus, the Council requested a letter be drafted for the Mayor’s signature to the Tom Green County Appraisal District requesting the City receive this notice of nomination earlier, perhaps mid August, to ensure sufficient time to more fully consider the nominations to be forwarded to the Chief Appraiser. Councilmember Holguin advised he had other individuals he would have preferred to bring forward. Motion, to adopt a Resolution nominating the following individuals for the Tom Green County Appraisal District Board of Directors: Dick Burnett, A.H. “Chico” Denis III, Louis Gomez, Walter Pfluger and John Phillips, as presented, was made by Councilmember Mahon and seconded by Councilmember Rainey. Aye: Mahon, Rainey, Lown, Morrison, Reeves and Bates. Nay: Holguin. Motion carried 6-1. Annex C, Page 453, “Resolution” Page 271 Vol. 98 Minutes December 13, 2005 APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION SETTING OUT NUMBER OF VOTES TO BE CAST FOR NOMINEES FOR BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF TOM GREEN COUNTY APPRAISAL DISTRICT FOR 2006-2007 NOTE: Nominations were not made in 2005 City Manager Harold Dominguez presented background information. Councilmember Holguin commented on the nominations and repeated requests to facilitate the process. General discussion was held on the time provided to submit votes and required turnaround of the nomination process. Mayor Lown requested staff work with Tom Green County Appraisal District on future nominations. Motion, to divide votes equally among nominees, was made by Mayor Lown and seconded by Councilmember Rainey. AYE: Lown, Bates, Farmer, Morrison, and Rainey NAY: Holguin. Motion carried 5-1.
- 217. Annex J, Page295, “Resolution” Page 5 Vol. 99 Minutes September 18, 2007 APPROVAL OF CANDIDATE NOMINATIONS TO SERVE ON THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TOM GREEN COUNTY (TGC) APPRAISAL DISTRICT FOR THE 2008-2009 TERM Mayor Lown suggested the Council consider reviewing the criteria and nominating individuals to serve on the TGC Appraisal District board. He commented the existing board consisted of the same members serving numerous terms. Finance Director Michael Dane stated the nomination process was time sensitive and noted the nomination should be finalized no later than October 15, 2007. Mayor Lown recommended Mr. Louis Hall. Councilmember Perez-Jimenez requested the item be considered at the Visions meeting on September 27 and 28, 2007. Council concurred. Mayor Lown informed the TGC board meets approximately 7 times a year for 1 to 3 hours. Mayor Lown recommended the nominees complete an application and forward such to City Clerk Alicia Ramirez. Page 5 Vol. 100 Minutes October 2, 2007 ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION NOMINATING LOUIS HALL AS A CANDIDATE FOR BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF TOM GREEN COUNTY APPRAISAL DISTRICT Motion, to adopt a Resolution nominating Louis Hall as a candidate for Board of Directors of Tom Green County Appraisal District, was made by Mayor Lown and seconded by Councilmember Perez-Jimenez. Motion carried unanimously. Annex F, Page 25, “Resolution” Minutes November 6, 2007 Page 5 Vol. 100 ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION SETTING OUT THE NUMBER OF VOTES TO BE CAST FOR NOMINEES FOR BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF TOM GREEN COUNTY APPRAISAL DISTRICT Councilmembers submitted their votes as follows: Councilmember Farmer, 199 for Louis Hall; Councilmember Hogg, 49.75 each for Dick Burnett, Louis Hall, Chico Denis, and Walter Pfluger; Councilmember Perez-Jimenez, 199 for Louis Hall; Mayor Lown, 199 for Louis Hall; Councilmember Cárdenas, 199 for Louis Hall; Councilmember Morrison, 199 for John Phillips; and Councilmember Fields, 199 for Louis Hall. Motion, to adopt a Resolution setting out 49.75 votes for Dick Burnett, 49.75 votes for A.H. “Chico” Denis, 0 votes for Louis P. Gomez, 1044.75 votes for Louis Hall, 49.75 votes for Walter W. Pfluger, and 199 votes for John D. Phillips to be cast for nominees for Board of Directors of Tom Green County Appraisal District, was made by Mayor Lown and seconded by Councilmember Farmer. Motion carried unanimously.
- 218. Annex G, Page89, “Resolution” Minutes October 6, 2009 Page 505 Vol. 101 ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION NOMINATING CANDIDATES EMILIO PEREZ-JIMENEZ, TIM EDWARDS, VICKIE BOULDEN, BOB REEVES, AND JOHN BEGNAUD AS CANDIDATES FOR THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TOM GREEN COUNTY APPRAISAL DISTRICT FOR THE 2010-2012 TERM City Clerk Alicia Ramirez presented background information. General discussion and nominations were made by the Councilmembers. Motion, to close nominations, was made by Councilmember Farmer and seconded by Councilmember Silvas. Motion carried unanimously. In conclusion, the following nominations were made. Motion, to adopt a resolution nominating candidates Emilio Perez-Jimenez, Tim Edwards, Vickie Boulden, Bob Reeves, and John Begnaud as candidates for the Board of Directors of the Tom Green County Appraisal District for the 2010-2012 Term, was made by Mayor Pro Tempore Hogg and seconded by Councilmember Adams. Motion carried unanimously. Annex A, Page, “Resolution” Page 6 Vol. 103 Minutes December 6, 2011 ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION CASTING VOTES FOR ONE NOMINEE OR DISTRIBUTING THEM AMONG NOMINEES FOR A POSITION ON THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TOM GREEN COUNTY APPRAISAL DISTRICT FOR THE JANUARY 1, 2012 THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 2013 TERM OF OFFICE (ANNEX G, PAGE 153, RESOLUTION #2011-12-130R) City Clerk Alicia Ramirez presented background information. Councilmember Morrison requested his votes be cast equally to Begnaud, Conn, and Reeves. Councilmember Silvas requested his total votes be cast to Diaz. The remaining City Council members requested their votes be cast equally to Begnaud, Conn, Gomez, Hall, and Reeves. Motion, to adopt the Resolution, as stated and votes casted, was made by Mayor New and seconded by Councilmember Farmer. Motion carried unanimously.
- 219. RESOLUTION OF THECITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS, CASTING VOTES FOR ONE NOMINEE OR DISTRIBUTING THEM AMONG NOMINEES FOR A POSITION ON THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TOM GREEN COUNTY APPRAISAL DISTRICT FOR THE JANUARY 1, 2014 THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 2015 TERM OF OFFICE WHEREAS, Section 6.03, Property Tax Code, State of Texas, allows a municipality that is a taxing unit in an appraisal district a voting entitlement to vote for directors as determined by the chief appraiser for each of the five positions to be filled on the board of directors of the Tom Green County Appraisal District; and WHEREAS, the City of San Angelo is a taxing unit of the Tom Green County Appraisal District; and WHEREAS, the City Council as governing body of the City of San Angelo desires to exercise its right of casting votes for one nominee or distribute them among nominees as provided by law for each of the five positions to be filled on the board of directors of the Tom Green County Appraisal District for the two year term of office commencing January 1, 2014, through December 31, 2015; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of San Angelo, Texas: Section 1. That the facts and recitations set forth in the preamble of this resolution be, and they are hereby, adopted, ratified, and confirmed. Section 2. That the City Council of the City of San Angelo, Texas, hereby allocates its total entitlement of 1,311 votes for the Tom Green County Appraisal District Board of Directors for two year terms beginning January 1, 2014 and expiring December 31, 2015, as follows: Nominee Name: Number of Votes Cast 1. John Begnaud _________ 2. John Conn _________ 3. Louis P. Gomez _________ 4. Louis Hall _________ 5. Bob Reeves _________ Section 3. That the Mayor for the City of San Angelo, as presiding officer, be, and that he is hereby, authorized and directed to deliver or cause to be delivered a certified copy of this resolution to the chief appraiser of the Tom Green County Appraisal District on or before December 15, 2013. Section 4. That this resolution shall take effect immediately from and after its passage, in accordance with the provisions of the State Statutes of the State of Texas.
- 220. Section 5. OpenMeetings Act. It is hereby officially found and determined that the meeting at which this resolution was passed was open to the public and public notice of the time, place and purpose of said meeting was given, all as required by the Open Meetings Act, Chapter 551, Texas Government Code. Motion made by __________________, seconded by __________________. Motion carried unanimously. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED ON THE 17 h DAY OF DECEMBER, 2013. THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS ______________________________ Dwain Morrison, Mayor ATTEST: _______________________ Alicia Ramirez, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO CONTENT APPROVED AS TO FORM: _________________________ Alicia Ramirez, City Clerk Lysia H. Bowling, City Attorney Received in the office of the Chief Appraiser, Tom Green County Appraisal District, on the _____ day of December, 2013. ________________________ Bill H. Benson, Chief Appraiser