SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 94
Download to read offline
Green Infrastructure
 Asset Management
 A     M
 in Onondaga County
Joanne M. Mahoney, County Executive
Joanne M Mahoney County Executive
Onondaga Lake Amended Consent Judgment (ACJ) Compliance Program



                        NYCOM Public Works Session
                            October 24, 2012
                       Matthew Millea, Deputy County Executive
                                for Physical Services

                               Matthew Marko PE BCEE
                                       Marko, PE,
                                     CH2M HILL
10/24/12

Onondaga County,
      g       y,                               City f Syracuse
                                               Cit of S
                                                                             2

   New York                                           Onondaga Lake




                                                      Onondaga Creek
• 7,660 acres
• 49 CSOs
• ~1 Billion gallons/year CSO   Harbor Brook
10/24/12
• 1988 – Atlantic States Legal Foundation
                                                    History
                                                                               3
  files lawsuit against County
• 1989 – Litigation settled through
  METRO consent judgment                       Onondaga Lake Facts
• 1998 – METRO consent judgment
  replaced with Amended Consent              Watershed: 285 Square Miles
  Judgment (ACJ)
                                             1 Mile Wide – 4.6 Miles Long
•   1st   ACJ amendment May 1998
• 2006 ACJ Amended to include                   Average Depth: 35 feet
                                                     g    p
  consolidation of ammonia and
  phosphorus treatment and Harbor                Max Depth: 63 feet
  Brook conveyances and RTF
              y
                                              1940 – Swimming Banned
•   3rd   Amendment April 2008 (Extension)
• 2009 ACJ amended to authorize use of         1970 – Fishing Banned
  Gray and Green infrastructure
4th
     ACJ Amendment Authorized a
                                                                        10/24/12
                                                                              4

Balanced Approach to CSO Abatement
      Regulatory Goals               Community Impacts/Goals
• Capture and Treat 95% of the      • Improve quality of life through
  Annual CSO Volume via               environmental responsibility
  Gray & Green Infrastructure       • Promote sustainability
• Achieve water quality             • Ensure cost effectiveness in
  standards in tributaries            compliance with ACJ milestones
                                         p
  and lake                          • Community revitalization


                             Major Milestones
              • 89.5% capture/elimination by 12/31/2013
               • 95% capture/elimination by 12/31/2018
                       p    /             y / /
Gray Infrastructure Program Builds on
      y                   g
                                           10/24/12
                                                 5

     10 Years of System Improvements




Ammonia decreased from 8 000 pounds
                          8,000
   per day (ppd) to less than 50 ppd
        Phosphorus decreased
        from 300 ppd to 50 ppd
Midland Regional Treatment Facility (
          g                       y (RTF) 6
                                        )
                                                      10/24/12




Advanced Despite Community Opposition


                         2009-2010
                         2009 2010 Performance
                        Flow to Facility   228.8 MG
                        Treated/Creek      123.2
                                           123 2 MG
                        Discharge
                        METRO              99.6 MG
                        Treatment
                        T t     t
                        Bypassed           6 MG
County Transitions from RTFs to Storage
     y                               g
                                      10/24/12
                                            7

     and Strategic Gray Projects
• Harbor Brook Interceptor (ARRA)
• Midland Conveyance (CSO 044)
• Sewer separation projects
  • CSO 022, CSO 045
• Clinton Storage Facility
• H b Brook S
  Harbor B k Storage F ili
                     Facility
Facilities Planning:
  Floatable Controls


  And, All New Gray
  Projects Include Green Elements!
Clinton Storage Facility
             g         y
                                                 10/24/12
                                                        8
                            Design Challenges
                            Underground Storage
                             Required
                            G i In, Pump Out
                             Gravity I P       O
                            High Chloride
                             Groundwater – 80,000
                             mg/l
                            ACJ Milestone – Tight
                             Schedule
                            Downtown Syracuse –
                                           y
                             noise, construction
                             traffic, parking
                             mitigation, coordination
                             with businesses
May 2012
Clinton Storage
             g
                           10/24/12

                  August
                    g            9
Harbor Brook Storage Facility
                  g         y
                                              10/24/12
                                                  10

                             Design Challenges
                             Underground Storage
                              Preferred
                             Gravity In, Pump Out
                             High Chloride
                              Groundwater
                              G     d t
                             Contaminated Soils
                             Limited Site
                             Hydraulics – CSO
                                 d li
                              Overflow Weirs,
                              Brook Elevation,
                              Flood Elevation
County Executive Mahoney Announces “Project 50!”
                                                                       10/24/12
                                                                           11
   “Onondaga County will construct fifty distinct green
   infrastructure projects to return rain water and snow
   melt to the ground instead of our sewer system.”
                                             system.
                         Joanne M. Mahoney, State of the County Address,
                                                           March 1, 2011

            Syracuse
        becomes one
        of ten Green
               Cities



                          Paradigm shifts from
                          planning to construction
Green (and Gray) Infrastructure Program Management 12
                                                              10/24/12



Need Increases with Approval of 4th Stipulation
 • Green Infrastructure (GI) is an emerging technology and 
   mostly new to Onondaga County Departments
   ▫ Need for a trusted advisor on program implementation
   ▫DDepartment can focus on existing operations, and Gray 
           t    t     f          i ti        ti       dG
     Program projects, while learning to integrate with GI
 • Role of the Green Program Manager
   Role of the Green Program Manager
   ▫ Develop strategy that meets ACJ milestones
   ▫ Provide GI expertise on applications, design standards, 
                   p           pp         ,    g           ,
     construction, and maintenance
   ▫ Prioritize opportunities based on diverse, dynamic factors
   ▫ Transition to a fully County operated GI Program by 2018
10/24/12
                   13




 Project 50!
 P j
Construction
Onondaga County             10/24/12
                                 14
Civic Strip
  OnCenter Convention Center
 66,000 Square Foot Green Roof
10/24/12
    15
10/24/12
    16
Onondaga County            10/24/12
                               19
Civic Strip
        War Memorial
    Cistern Reuse System
War Memorial Cistern Reuse System




Reusing rainwater appears to allow the ice making to occur one to two degrees
warmer than using potable water resulting in energy savings
10/24/12

First Commercial Green Street: Harrison Street                                  21




BEFORE: Stormwater enters catch       AFTER: Stormwater is diverted to
basins and is directly connected to   Green Streets and only overflows to
sewer                                 sewer when necessary
10/24/12

First Commercial Green Street: Harrison Street       23
10/24/12

OnCenter Surface Parking Lot: 290 green spaces
                       g          g      p                24

                                    GI Technology:
                                    Perimeter porous 
                                    asphalt and tree
                                        h l   d 
                                    infiltration trench
                                    Project Owner:
                                    County
                                    Capture Area:
                                     34,     q
                                    134,000 square feet
                                    Runoff Reduction:
                                    2,360,000 gallons/year
                                    Construction Cost: 
                                    C        i  C      
                                    $812,000 (bid)
                                    $/gallon: $0.48
Installation of Stone Storage Bed
10/24/12

OnCenter Surface Parking Lot
                       g                26




                               Porous
                               Asphalt
                               Perimeter
                               P i

                               “Embrace
                                 the
                                 Change”
                                 (Order)
10/24/12


OnCenter Municipal Parking Garage                    27



                             GI Technology:
                             Roof leaders to rain 
                             R f l d     i  
                             gardens
                             Project Owner:
                             County
                             Capture Area:
                             7 ,5
                             72,500 square feet
                                     q
                             Runoff Reduction:
                             1,277,000 gallons/year
                             Construction Cost: 
                             C        i  C      
                             $234,000 (bid)
                             $/gallon:  $0.26
10/24/12
                         28

OnCenter
Municipal Parking
      p         g
Garage



  Bio-Infiltration
10/24/12
    29
10/24/12
                                              30




Before

         Townsend Parking Lot (“Lot B”)
10/24/12
                                   31

Vegetated Infiltration Beds,
     90 Trees Planted
Base Course Asphalt Installed prior to winter shutdown
Volume capture: 975,000 gallons/year
10/24/12
                              34




     Project 50!
     P j
Beyond the Civic Strip:
  y                  p
    Green Streets
10/24/12

  Linking with Major Transportation
        g        j        p                                35

  Reconstruction Creates Green Progress
                                 Phase 1: Contracts 1 and 2
                                 Ph    1 C t     t      d




Image – Barton & Loguidice
Connective Corridor
                                                             10/24/12
                                                                 36




                  Capture Area:             6.75 ac
                  Run‐off Reduction:        5.16  MG/Year
                  Construction Cost:        $948,700 (bid)
                  $/gallon Runoff Capture   $0.18
                  $/gallon CSO Reduction    $0.26
                                            $0 26
Connective Corridor
                                                   10/24/12
                                                       37




                      Image – Barton & Loguidice
Connective Corridor
                      10/24/12
                          38
10/24/12

City Road Reconstruction: Pavement Removal       39

at Geddes Street




GI Technology:       Bioretention
Project Owner:       City of Syracuse
Capture Area:        29,700 square feet
Run‐off Reduction:   523,000 gallons/year
Construction Cost:       3,    ( )
                     $203,000 (bid)
$/gallon:            $0.55
Status:              completed
10/24/12
    40
10/24/12
                             41




      Project 50!
      P j
CSO Treatment Wetlands
CSO Treatment Wetland Project
Compensatory Storage Project Completed in 2011
                                          CSO 018


                                          Proposed
                                          Constructed
                                          Wetland


                                          Harbor
                                          Brook
Treatment Wetland Eliminates CSO 018
                                                     10/24/12
                                                         43
                              (up to design storm)



  •   144 Acre CSO b i
          A         basin
  •   40 overflows / year
  •   Significant Nutrient Removal
        g
  •   Partner with SUNY ESF
10/24/12
    44
10/24/12
                  45




Project 50!
P j
Green Parks
Rosamond Gifford Zoo
               Elephant Exhibit, 2011
                  p            ,
                                        GI T h l
                                        GI Technology:
6,000 sq.ft.                            Green roof
Green Roof                              Project Owner:
                                        County
                                        Capture Area:
Porous                                   ,     q
                                        6,000 square feet
pavement,                               Runoff Reduction:
and rain                                114,000 gallons/year
barrels for
stormwater                              Construction Cost: 
                                        C        i  C      
reuse                                   $183,900
                                        $/gallon: $2.27
Creekwalk Project Greening: Jefferson to Walton
                                                      Porous Asphalt
                                                      Strip in Parking Lot




Before


   Bioretention
   Bi       i
   Rain Garden

Flexi-pave
Flexi pave
Porous Walkway

  Porous Asphalt     Volume capture: 135,000 gallons/year
  Parking Lot
Creekwalk Project Greening: Walton to Fayette
                          Porous Concrete
                                                       Porous Asphalt
                                                       Strip in
                                                       Parking Lot



Before




Re-established
Natural Stream Bank
                      Volume capture: 119,000 gallons/year
10/24/12

Rosamond Gifford Zoo Entrance Enhancement                                             49



                                                               •GI Technology:
                                                                Rain gardens
                                                                R i   d
                                                               •Project Owner:
                                                                County/City
                                                               •Capture Area:
                                                                39,000 square feet
                                                               •Run off Reduction  
                                                               •Run‐off Reduction: 
                                                                680,000 gallons/year
                                                               •Construction Cost:
                                                                $300,000 (bid)
                                                               •$/gallon: $0.62
          Green Infrastructure Concept for the Zoo Entrance 
                                    p
10/24/12

Rosamond Gifford Zoo Entrance Enhancement           50




                                     Bio-infiltration
                                       Systems
                                       capture
                                       runoff from
                                       surrounding
                                       streets
10/24/12

Skiddy Park Porous Courts and Playground       51
10/24/12
                    52




 Project 50!
 P j
Green Schools
10/24/12

Hughes Magnet School
  g      g                           53




                       New Parking
                       Lot captures
                       runoff from
                       school roof
                         h l     f
                       and upper lot
10/24/12
                         54




   Project 50!
   P j
Green Parking Lots
            g
10/24/12

Sunnycrest Park Arena Parking Lot                                                     55

                                                                GI Technology:
                                                                Porous pavement
                                                                Rain garden
                                                                R i   d
                                                                Project Owner:
                                                                Syracuse Parks 
                                                                Dept.
                                                                Capture Area:
                                                                  7,     q
                                                                107,000 square feet
                                                                Run‐off Reduction:
                                                                1,876,000 
                                                                gallons/year
                                                                Construction Cost: 
                                                                $303,000 (bid)
         Map of Proposed Sunnycrest Arena Parking Lot Project   $/gallon: $0.22
Installation of Storage and Infiltration Systems
10/24/12
               57


Combination of
 bio-retention,
 bio retention
 porous
 asphalt, and
 subsurface
 storage and
 infiltration
 systems
10/24/12


Shifting the Paradigm
                                                                      58



Planning for Widespread Implementation of GI
Planning for Widespread Implementation of GI
 ▫ Opportunity/Idea Coordination
    New Project Form
              j
    Database and GIS Management
   Projects include: Parking Lots, Parking Garages, Schools, 
     Libraries, Parks, Firehouses, Post Offices, Streets (commercial 
     Lib i P k Fi h                P t Offi      St t (          i l
     and residential), Water Reuse, Wetlands, Roofs, Vacant Lots
 ▫ Concept Development
        p        p
    Site Visit, watershed identification, BMP Identification
    Calculator (capture and preliminary cost estimate)
10/24/12


Shifting the Paradigm
                                                                     59



Planning for Widespread Implementation of GI
Planning for Widespread Implementation of GI
 ▫ Landowner Endorsement
    Bi‐weekly City‐County Coordination Meeting
               y y         y                       g
     (if you think you can do this without a lot of coordination and 
     meetings ‐ you can not)
 ▫ Field Work and Permitting
   Field Work and Permitting
      Survey (including utility identification)
      Soils Testing (infiltration)
                   g(             )
      Environmental Analysis (Phase 1, Analytic Testing, etc.)
      SERP (SEQR, SHPO, SWPPP/NEPA/Landmark Preservation, etc.)
10/24/12


Shifting the Paradigm
                                                                60



Designing 50+ Projects
 ▫ 50% Plans
    Design Guidance Manual
    Design Workflow (flow chart)
                kfl (fl     h )
 ▫ 90% Plans and Specifications
 ▫ Final (for Construction) Plans Specifications and Bid Forms
   Final (for Construction) Plans, Specifications, and Bid Forms
    Comment Adjudication/
     Quality Assurance
 ▫ Cost Estimating
    At Concept and 90%
 ▫ D i C di ti
   Design Coordination
    WEEKLY Design and Construction Review Meeting
10/24/12
                                             61
East Water Street Gateway: Case Study
Project Features:
  ▫   Bike Boulevard
  ▫   Traffic Calming
  ▫   Private/Commercial collaboration
  ▫   Porous Paver Parking Lanes
  ▫   Curb Extensions
      Curb Extensions
  ▫   Robust Tree Planter systems
• Challenges Include:
  Challenges Include:
  ▫ Mid‐street pedestrian crossing
  ▫ Snow plow considerations
          p
  ▫ Turning radii for tractor trailers
10/24/12
                                                          62
Water Street Gateway Project Concept

                               GI Technology:
                               Infiltration trench 
                               and porous pavers
                               Project Owner:
                               City of Syracuse
                               Capture Area:
                               53,000 square feet
                                              f t
                               Runoff Reduction:
                               924,000 gallons/yr
                               Construction Cost: 
                               $920,000 (bid)
                               $/gallon: $1.00
                               $/gallon: $1 00
Water Street Gateway Project
                   y    j
                               10/24/12
                                   63




       Before
Water Street Gateway Project
                   y    j
                               10/24/12
                                   64




         During
10/24/12
            65




After
10/24/12
            66




After
10/24/12
    67
10/24/12


Shifting the Paradigm
                                                                    68



• Procurement
 ▫ Contract Documents: Bundling projects as appropriate
 ▫ Advertisement: Pre‐Bid Meeting, Addendum, Bid
• Construction
 ▫ Services During Construction
    Clarifications, RFIs, Modifications, Change Orders, etc.
 ▫ Construction Inspection
    PrimaVera Construction Manager
               Construction Manager
 ▫ Project Completion Reports
    $/gallon accounting
    Post‐project communication on challenges/successes
10/24/12


Other Program Elements
                                                            69



• Legislative Agenda
  ▫ Existing City Ordinances (Stormwater, Tree, Sidewalk)
  ▫ New and Innovative City Ordinances: Permission
• Enhanced Street Tree Program: 8500 new street trees
  Enhanced Street Tree Program: 8500 new street trees
• Rain Barrel Program: 650 and counting (Goal: 3600)
• Vacant Lot Program
  Vacant Lot Program
• Grant Funding: Federal/State successes
• Green Improvement Fund: Onondaga County’s
  Green Improvement Fund: Onondaga County s
 Public‐Private‐Partnership for Incentivizing GI
  ▫ Grants up to $200,000
  ▫ Stay tuned for a presentation on this, next year!
GIF: Porous Pavers at Hotel Skyler
                              y
                                         10/24/12
                                             70




                                     Porous
                                     Paver
                                     Parking
                                     Lot
10/24/12

Public Education and Outreach                                       71

• STR Website: www.SaveTheRain.us
• Monthly Report: for ACJ Parties County Legislature
  Monthly Report: for ACJ Parties, County Legislature
• Coalition Partners / Stakeholders
  City of Syracuse (DPW, Engineering, Law, School District, 
      y     y       (        g       g
   Parks, Zoning, Codes, etc.)
  ACJ Parties (NYS DEC, ASLF): Policy Committee
  Academic Community (SU SUNY ESF)
   Academic Community (SU, SUNY ESF)
  Community Groups / NFPs
  Business Community, Large Landowners (hospitals)
  General Public
  Manufacturers / Vendors / Suppliers
  Engineering Community
   Engineering Community
  Construction Community (M/WBEs), Bidders Wanted!
But, what about Maintenance?
   ,
                                  10/24/12
                                      72

The Paradigm Shifts Again…
• Asset Management
  Asset Management
 ▫ Asset Definition: Location, 
   quantity, make/model, etc.
 ▫ Standard Maintenance 
   Procedures (SMPs)
 ▫ Computerized Maintenance
   Computerized Maintenance 
   Management System (Maximo)
• Onondaga County is 
  committed to maintaining 
  its investment in Green 
  (and Gray) Infrastructure!
10/24/12


  Maintenance Training: March 2012
                                                   73


 Developed GI Maintenance Manual
 ▫ Conducted 1st annual training session
   Conducted 1 annual training session
    50+ participants, including
• Onondaga County Department of Water 
  Environment Protection (OCDWEP)
• Syracuse Department of Public Works
• Syracuse Water Department
• Syracuse Parks and Recreation
• Bureau of Planning and Sustainability
• Syracuse City School District
• Town of Geddes
• Syracuse University
• Onondaga Earth Corp.
• People's Equal Action and Community Effort
• Syracuse Downtown Committee
• Atlantic States Legal Foundation
• Central New York Community Foundation
• Syracuse Model Neighborhood Corp. (SMNC)
Maintenance Training: March 2012
10/24/12

What did the training participants say?          75

• Evaluation Forms completed by most attendees
• Feedback important for next year’s session
  Feedback important for next year s session 
10/24/12
    76
Maintenance Training: March 2012
• Attendee feedback was positive
• 2013 Session will be enhanced due to significant volume of 
                                           g
  built infrastructure in the public maintenance phase
10/24/12
                             78
What is
Wh t i GI M i t
          Maintenance?
                     ?
▫ 13 Standard
  13 Standard 
  Maintenance 
  Procedures (SMPs) 
             (    )
  have been prepared 
  for OCDWEP
Every GI Asset that needs maintenance
    y
                                        10/24/12
                                            79

has an associated SMP
10/24/12
                                           80
Maintenance: Seasonal Considerations
10/24/12

Maintenance Report Log(s)       81
10/24/12
                        82



Case Study:
          y
City Lot #3
Constructed
November 2010
Project Description
provides overview
of constructed GI for
Maintenance Staff
Maintenance Staff can find additional      10/24/12
                                               83
information in GI Technology Fact Sheets
Project File includes Engineered Stormwater Plan
                                               10/24/12
                                                   84
providing detail on the system as constructed
Green Infrastructure (GI) Assets are identified from
                                                       10/24/12
                                                           85
Engineered Stormwater Plans as Inputs for CMMS
10/24/12


Example of Asset List for City Lot #3
                                                                86




  •Manual TOC
   M      l
  •Training / Feedback from training session
  •Photo from session; Sign-in sheet
  •13 SMPs
  •Projects with Assets listed
  •Assets with Project Locations
  •Handouts with Maximo output for Lot 3 for 2011/12 work
  •Feedback on Costs
  •Maintenance Term Contractor
10/24/12
                                                          87

Maximo is the CMMS tool WEP is using
for Asset Management Program
• Work orders include:
 ▫   Maintenance activities/step by step directions
     M i             i ii /       b      di    i
 ▫   Tools/equipment (including costs)
 ▫   Planned time to complete
     Planned time to complete
 ▫   Actual maintenance info is loaded back into 
     Maximo after completion
     Maximo after completion
• Example maintenance task for E‐06 Porous 
  Pavement Vacuuming follows…
  Pavement Vacuuming follows
10/24/12


Maintenance: Labor Costs
                                                     89



• Contracted with local non‐profit, 
  Onondaga Earth Corps
  O      d    E hC
• Fall 2011: 4 sites maintained under 
  pilot effort ($14,000)
• 2012: Annual Contract for $19,000 
  (4 sites)
  ▫ Spring and Fall, with periodic support as 
    needed (up to 3x)
  ▫ Major landscape activities – weed, 
    mulch, trim veggie, trash removal
• WEP S ff
  WEP Staff performs vacuuming of 
               f           i    f
  porous pavements
  ▫ Spring + Fall 
  ▫ Labor Costs being calculated
Maintenance: Equipment Costs
• Major equipment required is porous pavement vacuum
• 1 month lease through state contract = $3,500
   • WEP currently contracts for one month in Spring,
     and one month in Fall
• OCDWEP is currently considering capital investment or 
  subcontracting the maintenance activity via a 
  subcontracting the maintenance activity via a
  Maintenance Term Contract (multiple local vac vendors)
10/24/12


Measuring Progress: Monitoring                        92


• ACJ Compliance
 ▫ Annual Report: April
        l             l
    SWMM : Volume Capture
     Goal: 246 MG/Yr by 2018
      Goal: 246 MG/Yr by 2018
   Ambient Monitoring Program
    (AMP): Water Quality
     Goal: Wet Weather Standards
• Net Environmental Benefit Analysis
• Funding Sources and Financial Tracking
“100 Projects” Milestone Achieved in September 2012
 100 Projects Milestone Achieved in September 2012
10/24/12


Save the Rain: 2012 2013
               2012-2013
                                                            93



• Focus on Efficiency over Quantity
  ▫ Improved Constructability
  ▫ Lower Maintenance
• Utilize SWMM for prioritization of project location
• Unit Price ‐ Quantity Based
  Construction Procurements 
  ▫ Civil Site Work Contract
  ▫ Landscape Installation and Maintenance Contract
        d            ll      d
  ▫ Post‐Warranty Maintenance Contract, conducted by
    Conservation Corps (Community Based Green Jobs)
    Conservation Corps (Community Based Green Jobs)
• Asset Management Consultant contracted
Thank You!
             Questions?

          Please Visit us at
        www.SaveTheRain.us

More Related Content

What's hot

Cleveland Harbor Sustainable Sediment Management Strategies-White, Carter-Cor...
Cleveland Harbor Sustainable Sediment Management Strategies-White, Carter-Cor...Cleveland Harbor Sustainable Sediment Management Strategies-White, Carter-Cor...
Cleveland Harbor Sustainable Sediment Management Strategies-White, Carter-Cor...Healthy Lakes, Healthy Lives
 
GREATER CLEVELAND AREA - NORTHEAST OHIO REGIONAL SEWER DISTRICT
GREATER CLEVELAND AREA - NORTHEAST OHIO REGIONAL SEWER DISTRICTGREATER CLEVELAND AREA - NORTHEAST OHIO REGIONAL SEWER DISTRICT
GREATER CLEVELAND AREA - NORTHEAST OHIO REGIONAL SEWER DISTRICTU.S. Water Alliance
 
Acj presentation master version rev_012111_1300
Acj presentation master version rev_012111_1300Acj presentation master version rev_012111_1300
Acj presentation master version rev_012111_1300aslfadmin
 
State & Federal Regulation of Hydraulic Fracturing: A Comparative Analysis
State & Federal Regulation of Hydraulic Fracturing: A Comparative AnalysisState & Federal Regulation of Hydraulic Fracturing: A Comparative Analysis
State & Federal Regulation of Hydraulic Fracturing: A Comparative AnalysisDan Arthur
 
Landform-based Erosion Control for Stormwater Management
Landform-based Erosion Control for Stormwater ManagementLandform-based Erosion Control for Stormwater Management
Landform-based Erosion Control for Stormwater ManagementOHM Advisors
 
Singapore's Response to Sanitation and Water Challenges
Singapore's Response to Sanitation and Water ChallengesSingapore's Response to Sanitation and Water Challenges
Singapore's Response to Sanitation and Water Challengesinfosanitasi
 
Hydraulic Fracturing Presentation
Hydraulic Fracturing PresentationHydraulic Fracturing Presentation
Hydraulic Fracturing Presentationbishopcj
 
Multifunctional Stormwater Projects - An Innovative Technical Design and Part...
Multifunctional Stormwater Projects - An Innovative Technical Design and Part...Multifunctional Stormwater Projects - An Innovative Technical Design and Part...
Multifunctional Stormwater Projects - An Innovative Technical Design and Part...Adam Berry
 
Matt MacConnell, Lehigh River Stocking Association, “Lausanne Tunnel Remediat...
Matt MacConnell, Lehigh River Stocking Association, “Lausanne Tunnel Remediat...Matt MacConnell, Lehigh River Stocking Association, “Lausanne Tunnel Remediat...
Matt MacConnell, Lehigh River Stocking Association, “Lausanne Tunnel Remediat...Michael Hewitt, GISP
 
Water infrastructure regulation in Italy: how does it work, does it work, and...
Water infrastructure regulation in Italy: how does it work, does it work, and...Water infrastructure regulation in Italy: how does it work, does it work, and...
Water infrastructure regulation in Italy: how does it work, does it work, and...Alberto Asquer
 
VMS November Presentation
VMS November PresentationVMS November Presentation
VMS November PresentationVMS Ventures
 
The Drought’s Affect on Dallas Water Utilities
The Drought’s Affect on Dallas Water UtilitiesThe Drought’s Affect on Dallas Water Utilities
The Drought’s Affect on Dallas Water UtilitiesThe Texas Network, LLC
 

What's hot (20)

Cleveland Harbor Sustainable Sediment Management Strategies-White, Carter-Cor...
Cleveland Harbor Sustainable Sediment Management Strategies-White, Carter-Cor...Cleveland Harbor Sustainable Sediment Management Strategies-White, Carter-Cor...
Cleveland Harbor Sustainable Sediment Management Strategies-White, Carter-Cor...
 
Setawwa 2010, 1-29 choules
Setawwa   2010, 1-29 choulesSetawwa   2010, 1-29 choules
Setawwa 2010, 1-29 choules
 
2012 Spotlight City: Denver, CO
2012 Spotlight City: Denver, CO2012 Spotlight City: Denver, CO
2012 Spotlight City: Denver, CO
 
MAPD 2010 - Creating the box
MAPD 2010 - Creating the boxMAPD 2010 - Creating the box
MAPD 2010 - Creating the box
 
GREATER CLEVELAND AREA - NORTHEAST OHIO REGIONAL SEWER DISTRICT
GREATER CLEVELAND AREA - NORTHEAST OHIO REGIONAL SEWER DISTRICTGREATER CLEVELAND AREA - NORTHEAST OHIO REGIONAL SEWER DISTRICT
GREATER CLEVELAND AREA - NORTHEAST OHIO REGIONAL SEWER DISTRICT
 
Australia china acedp mdba breifing final
Australia china acedp mdba breifing finalAustralia china acedp mdba breifing final
Australia china acedp mdba breifing final
 
Acj presentation master version rev_012111_1300
Acj presentation master version rev_012111_1300Acj presentation master version rev_012111_1300
Acj presentation master version rev_012111_1300
 
State & Federal Regulation of Hydraulic Fracturing: A Comparative Analysis
State & Federal Regulation of Hydraulic Fracturing: A Comparative AnalysisState & Federal Regulation of Hydraulic Fracturing: A Comparative Analysis
State & Federal Regulation of Hydraulic Fracturing: A Comparative Analysis
 
Landform-based Erosion Control for Stormwater Management
Landform-based Erosion Control for Stormwater ManagementLandform-based Erosion Control for Stormwater Management
Landform-based Erosion Control for Stormwater Management
 
Singapore's Response to Sanitation and Water Challenges
Singapore's Response to Sanitation and Water ChallengesSingapore's Response to Sanitation and Water Challenges
Singapore's Response to Sanitation and Water Challenges
 
Hydraulic Fracturing Presentation
Hydraulic Fracturing PresentationHydraulic Fracturing Presentation
Hydraulic Fracturing Presentation
 
2013 02 28
2013 02 282013 02 28
2013 02 28
 
Resource Recovery Panel
Resource Recovery PanelResource Recovery Panel
Resource Recovery Panel
 
Multifunctional Stormwater Projects - An Innovative Technical Design and Part...
Multifunctional Stormwater Projects - An Innovative Technical Design and Part...Multifunctional Stormwater Projects - An Innovative Technical Design and Part...
Multifunctional Stormwater Projects - An Innovative Technical Design and Part...
 
February 9, 2012
February 9, 2012February 9, 2012
February 9, 2012
 
Matt MacConnell, Lehigh River Stocking Association, “Lausanne Tunnel Remediat...
Matt MacConnell, Lehigh River Stocking Association, “Lausanne Tunnel Remediat...Matt MacConnell, Lehigh River Stocking Association, “Lausanne Tunnel Remediat...
Matt MacConnell, Lehigh River Stocking Association, “Lausanne Tunnel Remediat...
 
Water infrastructure regulation in Italy: how does it work, does it work, and...
Water infrastructure regulation in Italy: how does it work, does it work, and...Water infrastructure regulation in Italy: how does it work, does it work, and...
Water infrastructure regulation in Italy: how does it work, does it work, and...
 
Sustainable Planning Fundamentals
Sustainable Planning FundamentalsSustainable Planning Fundamentals
Sustainable Planning Fundamentals
 
VMS November Presentation
VMS November PresentationVMS November Presentation
VMS November Presentation
 
The Drought’s Affect on Dallas Water Utilities
The Drought’s Affect on Dallas Water UtilitiesThe Drought’s Affect on Dallas Water Utilities
The Drought’s Affect on Dallas Water Utilities
 

Similar to Green infrastructure asset management in Onondaga County - NYCOM 2012

Lecture 7 3 gd (1 may 12)
Lecture 7 3 gd (1 may 12)Lecture 7 3 gd (1 may 12)
Lecture 7 3 gd (1 may 12)Moutaz Moh
 
DesalinationPresentation
DesalinationPresentationDesalinationPresentation
DesalinationPresentationZacary Richards
 
Stormwater GreenHomeNYC August 2008
Stormwater GreenHomeNYC August 2008Stormwater GreenHomeNYC August 2008
Stormwater GreenHomeNYC August 2008GreenHomeNYC
 
Thomas Uva, "Upper Narragansett Bay Water Quality Sins of the Past, Present...
Thomas Uva, "Upper Narragansett Bay Water Quality  Sins of the Past, Present...Thomas Uva, "Upper Narragansett Bay Water Quality  Sins of the Past, Present...
Thomas Uva, "Upper Narragansett Bay Water Quality Sins of the Past, Present...riseagrant
 
Flaming Gorge Pipeline
Flaming Gorge PipelineFlaming Gorge Pipeline
Flaming Gorge Pipelinedacohen
 
OC harbor brook wetlands stakeholder 6 15-11 final-1
OC harbor brook wetlands stakeholder 6 15-11 final-1OC harbor brook wetlands stakeholder 6 15-11 final-1
OC harbor brook wetlands stakeholder 6 15-11 final-1Onondaga County Save the Rain
 
Brantwaterpresentation 121002114120-phpapp02
Brantwaterpresentation 121002114120-phpapp02Brantwaterpresentation 121002114120-phpapp02
Brantwaterpresentation 121002114120-phpapp02Louisette Lanteigne
 
Aquatic Connectivity: Benefitting Streams and Communities-Cogswell, 2012
Aquatic Connectivity: Benefitting Streams and Communities-Cogswell, 2012Aquatic Connectivity: Benefitting Streams and Communities-Cogswell, 2012
Aquatic Connectivity: Benefitting Streams and Communities-Cogswell, 2012Healthy Lakes, Healthy Lives
 
ACJ presentation
ACJ presentationACJ presentation
ACJ presentationretzcanter
 
GEO_Water_Energy_Nexus
GEO_Water_Energy_NexusGEO_Water_Energy_Nexus
GEO_Water_Energy_NexusConor Merrigan
 
Rockland county water sah
Rockland county water sahRockland county water sah
Rockland county water sahSally Haas
 
2009 07 (14) Ports Vs Coasts Pondy Case
2009 07 (14) Ports Vs Coasts Pondy Case2009 07 (14) Ports Vs Coasts Pondy Case
2009 07 (14) Ports Vs Coasts Pondy CasePondycan
 

Similar to Green infrastructure asset management in Onondaga County - NYCOM 2012 (20)

Save the Rain Presentation - NYSAC 2012
Save the Rain Presentation - NYSAC 2012Save the Rain Presentation - NYSAC 2012
Save the Rain Presentation - NYSAC 2012
 
Project 50 Construction - NYSATE 2012
Project 50 Construction - NYSATE 2012Project 50 Construction - NYSATE 2012
Project 50 Construction - NYSATE 2012
 
Marengo lid symposium_2011-09-25
Marengo lid symposium_2011-09-25Marengo lid symposium_2011-09-25
Marengo lid symposium_2011-09-25
 
Lecture 7 3 gd (1 may 12)
Lecture 7 3 gd (1 may 12)Lecture 7 3 gd (1 may 12)
Lecture 7 3 gd (1 may 12)
 
DesalinationPresentation
DesalinationPresentationDesalinationPresentation
DesalinationPresentation
 
Green Infrastructure Maintenance Workshop
Green Infrastructure Maintenance WorkshopGreen Infrastructure Maintenance Workshop
Green Infrastructure Maintenance Workshop
 
Aoc sediment update_part 1
Aoc sediment update_part 1Aoc sediment update_part 1
Aoc sediment update_part 1
 
Stormwater GreenHomeNYC August 2008
Stormwater GreenHomeNYC August 2008Stormwater GreenHomeNYC August 2008
Stormwater GreenHomeNYC August 2008
 
Thomas Uva, "Upper Narragansett Bay Water Quality Sins of the Past, Present...
Thomas Uva, "Upper Narragansett Bay Water Quality  Sins of the Past, Present...Thomas Uva, "Upper Narragansett Bay Water Quality  Sins of the Past, Present...
Thomas Uva, "Upper Narragansett Bay Water Quality Sins of the Past, Present...
 
Flaming Gorge Pipeline
Flaming Gorge PipelineFlaming Gorge Pipeline
Flaming Gorge Pipeline
 
OC harbor brook wetlands stakeholder 6 15-11 final-1
OC harbor brook wetlands stakeholder 6 15-11 final-1OC harbor brook wetlands stakeholder 6 15-11 final-1
OC harbor brook wetlands stakeholder 6 15-11 final-1
 
ReTHINK Water - San Diego County Water Authority
ReTHINK Water - San Diego County Water AuthorityReTHINK Water - San Diego County Water Authority
ReTHINK Water - San Diego County Water Authority
 
Brantwaterpresentation 121002114120-phpapp02
Brantwaterpresentation 121002114120-phpapp02Brantwaterpresentation 121002114120-phpapp02
Brantwaterpresentation 121002114120-phpapp02
 
Green City... Clean Water
Green City... Clean WaterGreen City... Clean Water
Green City... Clean Water
 
Aquatic Connectivity: Benefitting Streams and Communities-Cogswell, 2012
Aquatic Connectivity: Benefitting Streams and Communities-Cogswell, 2012Aquatic Connectivity: Benefitting Streams and Communities-Cogswell, 2012
Aquatic Connectivity: Benefitting Streams and Communities-Cogswell, 2012
 
Aoc sediment update_part2
Aoc sediment update_part2Aoc sediment update_part2
Aoc sediment update_part2
 
ACJ presentation
ACJ presentationACJ presentation
ACJ presentation
 
GEO_Water_Energy_Nexus
GEO_Water_Energy_NexusGEO_Water_Energy_Nexus
GEO_Water_Energy_Nexus
 
Rockland county water sah
Rockland county water sahRockland county water sah
Rockland county water sah
 
2009 07 (14) Ports Vs Coasts Pondy Case
2009 07 (14) Ports Vs Coasts Pondy Case2009 07 (14) Ports Vs Coasts Pondy Case
2009 07 (14) Ports Vs Coasts Pondy Case
 

More from Onondaga County Save the Rain

More from Onondaga County Save the Rain (11)

Onondaga Earth Corps - Green Infrastructure Maintenance
Onondaga Earth Corps - Green Infrastructure MaintenanceOnondaga Earth Corps - Green Infrastructure Maintenance
Onondaga Earth Corps - Green Infrastructure Maintenance
 
Legnetto GI Maintenance Presentation 2014
Legnetto GI Maintenance Presentation 2014Legnetto GI Maintenance Presentation 2014
Legnetto GI Maintenance Presentation 2014
 
Education & Outreach CSO044 - NYWEA 2012
Education & Outreach   CSO044 - NYWEA 2012Education & Outreach   CSO044 - NYWEA 2012
Education & Outreach CSO044 - NYWEA 2012
 
Harbor Brook Treatment Wetlands Design Status - Feb 2012
Harbor Brook Treatment Wetlands Design Status - Feb 2012Harbor Brook Treatment Wetlands Design Status - Feb 2012
Harbor Brook Treatment Wetlands Design Status - Feb 2012
 
Using Porous Pavements and Other Green Technologies to Reduce Urban Runoff & ...
Using Porous Pavements and Other Green Technologies to Reduce Urban Runoff & ...Using Porous Pavements and Other Green Technologies to Reduce Urban Runoff & ...
Using Porous Pavements and Other Green Technologies to Reduce Urban Runoff & ...
 
Porous Pavement in Cold Climates Part 2
Porous Pavement in Cold Climates Part 2Porous Pavement in Cold Climates Part 2
Porous Pavement in Cold Climates Part 2
 
Porous Pavement in Cold Climates Part 1
Porous Pavement in Cold Climates Part 1Porous Pavement in Cold Climates Part 1
Porous Pavement in Cold Climates Part 1
 
Clinton Storage Facility Construction Activity 12/19/11
Clinton Storage Facility Construction Activity 12/19/11Clinton Storage Facility Construction Activity 12/19/11
Clinton Storage Facility Construction Activity 12/19/11
 
Use of gi to reduce stormwater runoff squier - sept 2011
Use of gi to reduce stormwater runoff   squier - sept 2011Use of gi to reduce stormwater runoff   squier - sept 2011
Use of gi to reduce stormwater runoff squier - sept 2011
 
Sept 2011 monthly report
Sept 2011 monthly reportSept 2011 monthly report
Sept 2011 monthly report
 
Dodson 2011 09-26
Dodson 2011 09-26Dodson 2011 09-26
Dodson 2011 09-26
 

Green infrastructure asset management in Onondaga County - NYCOM 2012

  • 1. Green Infrastructure Asset Management A M in Onondaga County Joanne M. Mahoney, County Executive Joanne M Mahoney County Executive Onondaga Lake Amended Consent Judgment (ACJ) Compliance Program NYCOM Public Works Session October 24, 2012 Matthew Millea, Deputy County Executive for Physical Services Matthew Marko PE BCEE Marko, PE, CH2M HILL
  • 2. 10/24/12 Onondaga County, g y, City f Syracuse Cit of S 2 New York Onondaga Lake Onondaga Creek • 7,660 acres • 49 CSOs • ~1 Billion gallons/year CSO Harbor Brook
  • 3. 10/24/12 • 1988 – Atlantic States Legal Foundation History 3 files lawsuit against County • 1989 – Litigation settled through METRO consent judgment Onondaga Lake Facts • 1998 – METRO consent judgment replaced with Amended Consent Watershed: 285 Square Miles Judgment (ACJ) 1 Mile Wide – 4.6 Miles Long • 1st ACJ amendment May 1998 • 2006 ACJ Amended to include Average Depth: 35 feet g p consolidation of ammonia and phosphorus treatment and Harbor Max Depth: 63 feet Brook conveyances and RTF y 1940 – Swimming Banned • 3rd Amendment April 2008 (Extension) • 2009 ACJ amended to authorize use of 1970 – Fishing Banned Gray and Green infrastructure
  • 4. 4th ACJ Amendment Authorized a 10/24/12 4 Balanced Approach to CSO Abatement Regulatory Goals Community Impacts/Goals • Capture and Treat 95% of the • Improve quality of life through Annual CSO Volume via environmental responsibility Gray & Green Infrastructure • Promote sustainability • Achieve water quality • Ensure cost effectiveness in standards in tributaries compliance with ACJ milestones p and lake • Community revitalization Major Milestones • 89.5% capture/elimination by 12/31/2013 • 95% capture/elimination by 12/31/2018 p / y / /
  • 5. Gray Infrastructure Program Builds on y g 10/24/12 5 10 Years of System Improvements Ammonia decreased from 8 000 pounds 8,000 per day (ppd) to less than 50 ppd Phosphorus decreased from 300 ppd to 50 ppd
  • 6. Midland Regional Treatment Facility ( g y (RTF) 6 ) 10/24/12 Advanced Despite Community Opposition 2009-2010 2009 2010 Performance Flow to Facility 228.8 MG Treated/Creek 123.2 123 2 MG Discharge METRO 99.6 MG Treatment T t t Bypassed 6 MG
  • 7. County Transitions from RTFs to Storage y g 10/24/12 7 and Strategic Gray Projects • Harbor Brook Interceptor (ARRA) • Midland Conveyance (CSO 044) • Sewer separation projects • CSO 022, CSO 045 • Clinton Storage Facility • H b Brook S Harbor B k Storage F ili Facility Facilities Planning: Floatable Controls And, All New Gray Projects Include Green Elements!
  • 8. Clinton Storage Facility g y 10/24/12 8  Design Challenges  Underground Storage Required  G i In, Pump Out Gravity I P O  High Chloride Groundwater – 80,000 mg/l  ACJ Milestone – Tight Schedule  Downtown Syracuse – y noise, construction traffic, parking mitigation, coordination with businesses May 2012
  • 9. Clinton Storage g 10/24/12 August g 9
  • 10. Harbor Brook Storage Facility g y 10/24/12 10  Design Challenges  Underground Storage Preferred  Gravity In, Pump Out  High Chloride Groundwater G d t  Contaminated Soils  Limited Site  Hydraulics – CSO d li Overflow Weirs, Brook Elevation, Flood Elevation
  • 11. County Executive Mahoney Announces “Project 50!” 10/24/12 11 “Onondaga County will construct fifty distinct green infrastructure projects to return rain water and snow melt to the ground instead of our sewer system.” system. Joanne M. Mahoney, State of the County Address, March 1, 2011 Syracuse becomes one of ten Green Cities Paradigm shifts from planning to construction
  • 12. Green (and Gray) Infrastructure Program Management 12 10/24/12 Need Increases with Approval of 4th Stipulation • Green Infrastructure (GI) is an emerging technology and  mostly new to Onondaga County Departments ▫ Need for a trusted advisor on program implementation ▫DDepartment can focus on existing operations, and Gray  t t f i ti ti dG Program projects, while learning to integrate with GI • Role of the Green Program Manager Role of the Green Program Manager ▫ Develop strategy that meets ACJ milestones ▫ Provide GI expertise on applications, design standards,  p pp , g , construction, and maintenance ▫ Prioritize opportunities based on diverse, dynamic factors ▫ Transition to a fully County operated GI Program by 2018
  • 13. 10/24/12 13 Project 50! P j Construction
  • 14. Onondaga County 10/24/12 14 Civic Strip OnCenter Convention Center 66,000 Square Foot Green Roof
  • 15. 10/24/12 15
  • 16. 10/24/12 16
  • 17.
  • 18.
  • 19. Onondaga County 10/24/12 19 Civic Strip War Memorial Cistern Reuse System
  • 20. War Memorial Cistern Reuse System Reusing rainwater appears to allow the ice making to occur one to two degrees warmer than using potable water resulting in energy savings
  • 21. 10/24/12 First Commercial Green Street: Harrison Street 21 BEFORE: Stormwater enters catch AFTER: Stormwater is diverted to basins and is directly connected to Green Streets and only overflows to sewer sewer when necessary
  • 22.
  • 23. 10/24/12 First Commercial Green Street: Harrison Street 23
  • 24. 10/24/12 OnCenter Surface Parking Lot: 290 green spaces g g p 24 GI Technology: Perimeter porous  asphalt and tree h l   d  infiltration trench Project Owner: County Capture Area: 34, q 134,000 square feet Runoff Reduction: 2,360,000 gallons/year Construction Cost:  C i  C   $812,000 (bid) $/gallon: $0.48
  • 25. Installation of Stone Storage Bed
  • 26. 10/24/12 OnCenter Surface Parking Lot g 26 Porous Asphalt Perimeter P i “Embrace the Change” (Order)
  • 27. 10/24/12 OnCenter Municipal Parking Garage 27 GI Technology: Roof leaders to rain  R f l d     i   gardens Project Owner: County Capture Area: 7 ,5 72,500 square feet q Runoff Reduction: 1,277,000 gallons/year Construction Cost:  C i  C   $234,000 (bid) $/gallon:  $0.26
  • 28. 10/24/12 28 OnCenter Municipal Parking p g Garage Bio-Infiltration
  • 29. 10/24/12 29
  • 30. 10/24/12 30 Before Townsend Parking Lot (“Lot B”)
  • 31. 10/24/12 31 Vegetated Infiltration Beds, 90 Trees Planted
  • 32. Base Course Asphalt Installed prior to winter shutdown
  • 33. Volume capture: 975,000 gallons/year
  • 34. 10/24/12 34 Project 50! P j Beyond the Civic Strip: y p Green Streets
  • 35. 10/24/12 Linking with Major Transportation g j p 35 Reconstruction Creates Green Progress Phase 1: Contracts 1 and 2 Ph 1 C t t d Image – Barton & Loguidice
  • 36. Connective Corridor 10/24/12 36 Capture Area: 6.75 ac Run‐off Reduction: 5.16  MG/Year Construction Cost: $948,700 (bid) $/gallon Runoff Capture $0.18 $/gallon CSO Reduction $0.26 $0 26
  • 37. Connective Corridor 10/24/12 37 Image – Barton & Loguidice
  • 38. Connective Corridor 10/24/12 38
  • 39. 10/24/12 City Road Reconstruction: Pavement Removal 39 at Geddes Street GI Technology: Bioretention Project Owner: City of Syracuse Capture Area: 29,700 square feet Run‐off Reduction: 523,000 gallons/year Construction Cost: 3, ( ) $203,000 (bid) $/gallon: $0.55 Status: completed
  • 40. 10/24/12 40
  • 41. 10/24/12 41 Project 50! P j CSO Treatment Wetlands
  • 42. CSO Treatment Wetland Project Compensatory Storage Project Completed in 2011 CSO 018 Proposed Constructed Wetland Harbor Brook
  • 43. Treatment Wetland Eliminates CSO 018 10/24/12 43 (up to design storm) • 144 Acre CSO b i A basin • 40 overflows / year • Significant Nutrient Removal g • Partner with SUNY ESF
  • 44. 10/24/12 44
  • 45. 10/24/12 45 Project 50! P j Green Parks
  • 46. Rosamond Gifford Zoo Elephant Exhibit, 2011 p , GI T h l GI Technology: 6,000 sq.ft. Green roof Green Roof Project Owner: County Capture Area: Porous , q 6,000 square feet pavement, Runoff Reduction: and rain 114,000 gallons/year barrels for stormwater Construction Cost:  C i  C   reuse $183,900 $/gallon: $2.27
  • 47. Creekwalk Project Greening: Jefferson to Walton Porous Asphalt Strip in Parking Lot Before Bioretention Bi i Rain Garden Flexi-pave Flexi pave Porous Walkway Porous Asphalt Volume capture: 135,000 gallons/year Parking Lot
  • 48. Creekwalk Project Greening: Walton to Fayette Porous Concrete Porous Asphalt Strip in Parking Lot Before Re-established Natural Stream Bank Volume capture: 119,000 gallons/year
  • 49. 10/24/12 Rosamond Gifford Zoo Entrance Enhancement 49 •GI Technology: Rain gardens R i   d •Project Owner: County/City •Capture Area: 39,000 square feet •Run off Reduction   •Run‐off Reduction:  680,000 gallons/year •Construction Cost: $300,000 (bid) •$/gallon: $0.62 Green Infrastructure Concept for the Zoo Entrance  p
  • 50. 10/24/12 Rosamond Gifford Zoo Entrance Enhancement 50 Bio-infiltration Systems capture runoff from surrounding streets
  • 51. 10/24/12 Skiddy Park Porous Courts and Playground 51
  • 52. 10/24/12 52 Project 50! P j Green Schools
  • 53. 10/24/12 Hughes Magnet School g g 53 New Parking Lot captures runoff from school roof h l f and upper lot
  • 54. 10/24/12 54 Project 50! P j Green Parking Lots g
  • 55. 10/24/12 Sunnycrest Park Arena Parking Lot 55 GI Technology: Porous pavement Rain garden R i   d Project Owner: Syracuse Parks  Dept. Capture Area: 7, q 107,000 square feet Run‐off Reduction: 1,876,000  gallons/year Construction Cost:  $303,000 (bid) Map of Proposed Sunnycrest Arena Parking Lot Project $/gallon: $0.22
  • 56. Installation of Storage and Infiltration Systems
  • 57. 10/24/12 57 Combination of bio-retention, bio retention porous asphalt, and subsurface storage and infiltration systems
  • 58. 10/24/12 Shifting the Paradigm 58 Planning for Widespread Implementation of GI Planning for Widespread Implementation of GI ▫ Opportunity/Idea Coordination  New Project Form j  Database and GIS Management Projects include: Parking Lots, Parking Garages, Schools,  Libraries, Parks, Firehouses, Post Offices, Streets (commercial  Lib i P k Fi h P t Offi St t ( i l and residential), Water Reuse, Wetlands, Roofs, Vacant Lots ▫ Concept Development p p  Site Visit, watershed identification, BMP Identification  Calculator (capture and preliminary cost estimate)
  • 59. 10/24/12 Shifting the Paradigm 59 Planning for Widespread Implementation of GI Planning for Widespread Implementation of GI ▫ Landowner Endorsement  Bi‐weekly City‐County Coordination Meeting y y y g (if you think you can do this without a lot of coordination and  meetings ‐ you can not) ▫ Field Work and Permitting Field Work and Permitting  Survey (including utility identification)  Soils Testing (infiltration) g( )  Environmental Analysis (Phase 1, Analytic Testing, etc.)  SERP (SEQR, SHPO, SWPPP/NEPA/Landmark Preservation, etc.)
  • 60. 10/24/12 Shifting the Paradigm 60 Designing 50+ Projects ▫ 50% Plans  Design Guidance Manual  Design Workflow (flow chart) kfl (fl h ) ▫ 90% Plans and Specifications ▫ Final (for Construction) Plans Specifications and Bid Forms Final (for Construction) Plans, Specifications, and Bid Forms  Comment Adjudication/ Quality Assurance ▫ Cost Estimating  At Concept and 90% ▫ D i C di ti Design Coordination  WEEKLY Design and Construction Review Meeting
  • 61. 10/24/12 61 East Water Street Gateway: Case Study Project Features: ▫ Bike Boulevard ▫ Traffic Calming ▫ Private/Commercial collaboration ▫ Porous Paver Parking Lanes ▫ Curb Extensions Curb Extensions ▫ Robust Tree Planter systems • Challenges Include: Challenges Include: ▫ Mid‐street pedestrian crossing ▫ Snow plow considerations p ▫ Turning radii for tractor trailers
  • 62. 10/24/12 62 Water Street Gateway Project Concept GI Technology: Infiltration trench  and porous pavers Project Owner: City of Syracuse Capture Area: 53,000 square feet    f t Runoff Reduction: 924,000 gallons/yr Construction Cost:  $920,000 (bid) $/gallon: $1.00 $/gallon: $1 00
  • 63. Water Street Gateway Project y j 10/24/12 63 Before
  • 64. Water Street Gateway Project y j 10/24/12 64 During
  • 65. 10/24/12 65 After
  • 66. 10/24/12 66 After
  • 67. 10/24/12 67
  • 68. 10/24/12 Shifting the Paradigm 68 • Procurement ▫ Contract Documents: Bundling projects as appropriate ▫ Advertisement: Pre‐Bid Meeting, Addendum, Bid • Construction ▫ Services During Construction  Clarifications, RFIs, Modifications, Change Orders, etc. ▫ Construction Inspection  PrimaVera Construction Manager Construction Manager ▫ Project Completion Reports  $/gallon accounting  Post‐project communication on challenges/successes
  • 69. 10/24/12 Other Program Elements 69 • Legislative Agenda ▫ Existing City Ordinances (Stormwater, Tree, Sidewalk) ▫ New and Innovative City Ordinances: Permission • Enhanced Street Tree Program: 8500 new street trees Enhanced Street Tree Program: 8500 new street trees • Rain Barrel Program: 650 and counting (Goal: 3600) • Vacant Lot Program Vacant Lot Program • Grant Funding: Federal/State successes • Green Improvement Fund: Onondaga County’s Green Improvement Fund: Onondaga County s Public‐Private‐Partnership for Incentivizing GI ▫ Grants up to $200,000 ▫ Stay tuned for a presentation on this, next year!
  • 70. GIF: Porous Pavers at Hotel Skyler y 10/24/12 70 Porous Paver Parking Lot
  • 71. 10/24/12 Public Education and Outreach 71 • STR Website: www.SaveTheRain.us • Monthly Report: for ACJ Parties County Legislature Monthly Report: for ACJ Parties, County Legislature • Coalition Partners / Stakeholders  City of Syracuse (DPW, Engineering, Law, School District,  y y ( g g Parks, Zoning, Codes, etc.)  ACJ Parties (NYS DEC, ASLF): Policy Committee  Academic Community (SU SUNY ESF) Academic Community (SU, SUNY ESF)  Community Groups / NFPs  Business Community, Large Landowners (hospitals)  General Public  Manufacturers / Vendors / Suppliers  Engineering Community Engineering Community  Construction Community (M/WBEs), Bidders Wanted!
  • 72. But, what about Maintenance? , 10/24/12 72 The Paradigm Shifts Again… • Asset Management Asset Management ▫ Asset Definition: Location,  quantity, make/model, etc. ▫ Standard Maintenance  Procedures (SMPs) ▫ Computerized Maintenance Computerized Maintenance  Management System (Maximo) • Onondaga County is  committed to maintaining  its investment in Green  (and Gray) Infrastructure!
  • 73. 10/24/12 Maintenance Training: March 2012 73 Developed GI Maintenance Manual ▫ Conducted 1st annual training session Conducted 1 annual training session  50+ participants, including • Onondaga County Department of Water  Environment Protection (OCDWEP) • Syracuse Department of Public Works • Syracuse Water Department • Syracuse Parks and Recreation • Bureau of Planning and Sustainability • Syracuse City School District • Town of Geddes • Syracuse University • Onondaga Earth Corp. • People's Equal Action and Community Effort • Syracuse Downtown Committee • Atlantic States Legal Foundation • Central New York Community Foundation • Syracuse Model Neighborhood Corp. (SMNC)
  • 75. 10/24/12 What did the training participants say? 75 • Evaluation Forms completed by most attendees • Feedback important for next year’s session Feedback important for next year s session 
  • 76. 10/24/12 76
  • 77. Maintenance Training: March 2012 • Attendee feedback was positive • 2013 Session will be enhanced due to significant volume of  g built infrastructure in the public maintenance phase
  • 78. 10/24/12 78 What is Wh t i GI M i t Maintenance? ? ▫ 13 Standard 13 Standard  Maintenance  Procedures (SMPs)  ( ) have been prepared  for OCDWEP
  • 79. Every GI Asset that needs maintenance y 10/24/12 79 has an associated SMP
  • 80. 10/24/12 80 Maintenance: Seasonal Considerations
  • 82. 10/24/12 82 Case Study: y City Lot #3 Constructed November 2010 Project Description provides overview of constructed GI for Maintenance Staff
  • 83. Maintenance Staff can find additional 10/24/12 83 information in GI Technology Fact Sheets
  • 84. Project File includes Engineered Stormwater Plan 10/24/12 84 providing detail on the system as constructed
  • 85. Green Infrastructure (GI) Assets are identified from 10/24/12 85 Engineered Stormwater Plans as Inputs for CMMS
  • 86. 10/24/12 Example of Asset List for City Lot #3 86 •Manual TOC M l •Training / Feedback from training session •Photo from session; Sign-in sheet •13 SMPs •Projects with Assets listed •Assets with Project Locations •Handouts with Maximo output for Lot 3 for 2011/12 work •Feedback on Costs •Maintenance Term Contractor
  • 87. 10/24/12 87 Maximo is the CMMS tool WEP is using for Asset Management Program • Work orders include: ▫ Maintenance activities/step by step directions M i i ii / b di i ▫ Tools/equipment (including costs) ▫ Planned time to complete Planned time to complete ▫ Actual maintenance info is loaded back into  Maximo after completion Maximo after completion • Example maintenance task for E‐06 Porous  Pavement Vacuuming follows… Pavement Vacuuming follows
  • 88.
  • 89. 10/24/12 Maintenance: Labor Costs 89 • Contracted with local non‐profit,  Onondaga Earth Corps O d E hC • Fall 2011: 4 sites maintained under  pilot effort ($14,000) • 2012: Annual Contract for $19,000  (4 sites) ▫ Spring and Fall, with periodic support as  needed (up to 3x) ▫ Major landscape activities – weed,  mulch, trim veggie, trash removal • WEP S ff WEP Staff performs vacuuming of  f i f porous pavements ▫ Spring + Fall  ▫ Labor Costs being calculated
  • 90. Maintenance: Equipment Costs • Major equipment required is porous pavement vacuum • 1 month lease through state contract = $3,500 • WEP currently contracts for one month in Spring, and one month in Fall • OCDWEP is currently considering capital investment or  subcontracting the maintenance activity via a  subcontracting the maintenance activity via a Maintenance Term Contract (multiple local vac vendors)
  • 91.
  • 92. 10/24/12 Measuring Progress: Monitoring 92 • ACJ Compliance ▫ Annual Report: April l l  SWMM : Volume Capture  Goal: 246 MG/Yr by 2018 Goal: 246 MG/Yr by 2018  Ambient Monitoring Program (AMP): Water Quality  Goal: Wet Weather Standards • Net Environmental Benefit Analysis • Funding Sources and Financial Tracking “100 Projects” Milestone Achieved in September 2012 100 Projects Milestone Achieved in September 2012
  • 93. 10/24/12 Save the Rain: 2012 2013 2012-2013 93 • Focus on Efficiency over Quantity ▫ Improved Constructability ▫ Lower Maintenance • Utilize SWMM for prioritization of project location • Unit Price ‐ Quantity Based Construction Procurements  ▫ Civil Site Work Contract ▫ Landscape Installation and Maintenance Contract d ll d ▫ Post‐Warranty Maintenance Contract, conducted by Conservation Corps (Community Based Green Jobs) Conservation Corps (Community Based Green Jobs) • Asset Management Consultant contracted
  • 94. Thank You! Questions? Please Visit us at www.SaveTheRain.us