The document elaborates on the derivations of the energy components in an extrusion model. It discusses four components: 1) Ideal work to plastically deform the material, 2) Friction work at the die-shoulder and inside the container, 3) Shearing work to plastically shear the material, and 4) Bending work which does not apply to direct extrusion. It then provides detailed derivations of the ideal work and friction work components using concepts of stress, strain, and energy methods. The derivations make assumptions about mean flow stresses and friction to obtain equations for the specific work and total work of each component.
Ekeeda Provides Online Video Lectures for Civil Engineering Degree Subject Courses for All Engineering Universities. Visit us: https://ekeeda.com/streamdetails/stream/civil-engineering
Ekeeda Provides Online Civil Engineering Degree Subjects Courses, Video Lectures for All Engineering Universities. Video Tutorials Covers Subjects of Mechanical Engineering Degree.
Learn Online Courses of Subject Engineering Mechanics of First Year Engineering. Clear the Concepts of Engineering Mechanics Through Video Lectures and PDF Notes. Visit us: https://ekeeda.com/streamdetails/subject/Engineering-Mechanics
Combined Steady and Variable Stresses, Gerber Method for Combination of Stre...saqibmuneer5
Combined Steady and Variable Stresses, Gerber Method for
Combination of Stresses, Goodman Method for Combination
of Stresses, Soderberg Method for Combination of Stresses.
Ekeeda Provides Online Video Lectures for Civil Engineering Degree Subject Courses for All Engineering Universities. Visit us: https://ekeeda.com/streamdetails/stream/civil-engineering
Ekeeda Provides Online Civil Engineering Degree Subjects Courses, Video Lectures for All Engineering Universities. Video Tutorials Covers Subjects of Mechanical Engineering Degree.
Learn Online Courses of Subject Engineering Mechanics of First Year Engineering. Clear the Concepts of Engineering Mechanics Through Video Lectures and PDF Notes. Visit us: https://ekeeda.com/streamdetails/subject/Engineering-Mechanics
Combined Steady and Variable Stresses, Gerber Method for Combination of Stre...saqibmuneer5
Combined Steady and Variable Stresses, Gerber Method for
Combination of Stresses, Goodman Method for Combination
of Stresses, Soderberg Method for Combination of Stresses.
HCR's Infinite or Convergence Series (Calculations of Volume, Surface Area of...Harish Chandra Rajpoot
Three series had been derived by the author, using double-integration in polar co-ordinates, binomial expansion and β & γ-functions for determining the volume, surface-area & perimeter of elliptical-section of oblique frustum of a right circular cone. All these three series are in form of discrete summation of infinite terms which converge into finite values hence these were also named as HCR’s convergence series. These are extremely useful in case studies & practical computations.
This book is intended to cover the basic Strength of Materials of the first
two years of an engineering degree or diploma course ; it does not attempt
to deal with the more specialized topics which usually comprise the final
year of such courses.
The work has been confined to the mathematical aspect of the subject
and no descriptive matter relating to design or materials testing has been
included.
Transient three dimensional cfd modelling of ceilng fanLahiru Dilshan
Ceiling fans are used to get thermal comfort, especially in tropical countries. With the increment of the usage of air conditioners, the emission of CO2 is increased. But ceiling fans are a limited solution, that saves much energy compared to air conditioners. Ceiling fans generate a non-uniform velocity profile, so that, there is a non-uniform thermal environment. That non-uniform environment does not imply lower thermal comfort, that will give enough thermal comfort with low energy cost by air velocity. Hence, there will be difficulties of analysing with simple modelling techniques in that environment. So, to predict the performance of the ceiling fan required more accurate models.
The accurate model of a ceiling fan will generate complex geometry that makes difficulties for the simulation process and requires higher computational power. Because of that, there are several methods used to predict the performance of the ceiling fan using mathematical techniques but that will give an estimated value of properties in the surrounding.
Deflection of structures using double integration method, moment area method, elastic load method, conjugate beam method, virtual work, castiglianois second theorem and method of consistent deformations
This power point presentation has for post graduate student in mechanical engineering in thermal engineering. This presentation is quite simple and perfect to explain the axial flow compressor and fan.It is the best presentation.
The Internet of Things (IoT) is a revolutionary concept that connects everyday objects and devices to the internet, enabling them to communicate, collect, and exchange data. Imagine a world where your refrigerator notifies you when you’re running low on groceries, or streetlights adjust their brightness based on traffic patterns – that’s the power of IoT. In essence, IoT transforms ordinary objects into smart, interconnected devices, creating a network of endless possibilities.
Here is a blog on the role of electrical and electronics engineers in IOT. Let's dig in!!!!
For more such content visit: https://nttftrg.com/
HCR's Infinite or Convergence Series (Calculations of Volume, Surface Area of...Harish Chandra Rajpoot
Three series had been derived by the author, using double-integration in polar co-ordinates, binomial expansion and β & γ-functions for determining the volume, surface-area & perimeter of elliptical-section of oblique frustum of a right circular cone. All these three series are in form of discrete summation of infinite terms which converge into finite values hence these were also named as HCR’s convergence series. These are extremely useful in case studies & practical computations.
This book is intended to cover the basic Strength of Materials of the first
two years of an engineering degree or diploma course ; it does not attempt
to deal with the more specialized topics which usually comprise the final
year of such courses.
The work has been confined to the mathematical aspect of the subject
and no descriptive matter relating to design or materials testing has been
included.
Transient three dimensional cfd modelling of ceilng fanLahiru Dilshan
Ceiling fans are used to get thermal comfort, especially in tropical countries. With the increment of the usage of air conditioners, the emission of CO2 is increased. But ceiling fans are a limited solution, that saves much energy compared to air conditioners. Ceiling fans generate a non-uniform velocity profile, so that, there is a non-uniform thermal environment. That non-uniform environment does not imply lower thermal comfort, that will give enough thermal comfort with low energy cost by air velocity. Hence, there will be difficulties of analysing with simple modelling techniques in that environment. So, to predict the performance of the ceiling fan required more accurate models.
The accurate model of a ceiling fan will generate complex geometry that makes difficulties for the simulation process and requires higher computational power. Because of that, there are several methods used to predict the performance of the ceiling fan using mathematical techniques but that will give an estimated value of properties in the surrounding.
Deflection of structures using double integration method, moment area method, elastic load method, conjugate beam method, virtual work, castiglianois second theorem and method of consistent deformations
This power point presentation has for post graduate student in mechanical engineering in thermal engineering. This presentation is quite simple and perfect to explain the axial flow compressor and fan.It is the best presentation.
The Internet of Things (IoT) is a revolutionary concept that connects everyday objects and devices to the internet, enabling them to communicate, collect, and exchange data. Imagine a world where your refrigerator notifies you when you’re running low on groceries, or streetlights adjust their brightness based on traffic patterns – that’s the power of IoT. In essence, IoT transforms ordinary objects into smart, interconnected devices, creating a network of endless possibilities.
Here is a blog on the role of electrical and electronics engineers in IOT. Let's dig in!!!!
For more such content visit: https://nttftrg.com/
CW RADAR, FMCW RADAR, FMCW ALTIMETER, AND THEIR PARAMETERSveerababupersonal22
It consists of cw radar and fmcw radar ,range measurement,if amplifier and fmcw altimeterThe CW radar operates using continuous wave transmission, while the FMCW radar employs frequency-modulated continuous wave technology. Range measurement is a crucial aspect of radar systems, providing information about the distance to a target. The IF amplifier plays a key role in signal processing, amplifying intermediate frequency signals for further analysis. The FMCW altimeter utilizes frequency-modulated continuous wave technology to accurately measure altitude above a reference point.
Student information management system project report ii.pdfKamal Acharya
Our project explains about the student management. This project mainly explains the various actions related to student details. This project shows some ease in adding, editing and deleting the student details. It also provides a less time consuming process for viewing, adding, editing and deleting the marks of the students.
Sachpazis:Terzaghi Bearing Capacity Estimation in simple terms with Calculati...Dr.Costas Sachpazis
Terzaghi's soil bearing capacity theory, developed by Karl Terzaghi, is a fundamental principle in geotechnical engineering used to determine the bearing capacity of shallow foundations. This theory provides a method to calculate the ultimate bearing capacity of soil, which is the maximum load per unit area that the soil can support without undergoing shear failure. The Calculation HTML Code included.
Hierarchical Digital Twin of a Naval Power SystemKerry Sado
A hierarchical digital twin of a Naval DC power system has been developed and experimentally verified. Similar to other state-of-the-art digital twins, this technology creates a digital replica of the physical system executed in real-time or faster, which can modify hardware controls. However, its advantage stems from distributing computational efforts by utilizing a hierarchical structure composed of lower-level digital twin blocks and a higher-level system digital twin. Each digital twin block is associated with a physical subsystem of the hardware and communicates with a singular system digital twin, which creates a system-level response. By extracting information from each level of the hierarchy, power system controls of the hardware were reconfigured autonomously. This hierarchical digital twin development offers several advantages over other digital twins, particularly in the field of naval power systems. The hierarchical structure allows for greater computational efficiency and scalability while the ability to autonomously reconfigure hardware controls offers increased flexibility and responsiveness. The hierarchical decomposition and models utilized were well aligned with the physical twin, as indicated by the maximum deviations between the developed digital twin hierarchy and the hardware.
Hybrid optimization of pumped hydro system and solar- Engr. Abdul-Azeez.pdffxintegritypublishin
Advancements in technology unveil a myriad of electrical and electronic breakthroughs geared towards efficiently harnessing limited resources to meet human energy demands. The optimization of hybrid solar PV panels and pumped hydro energy supply systems plays a pivotal role in utilizing natural resources effectively. This initiative not only benefits humanity but also fosters environmental sustainability. The study investigated the design optimization of these hybrid systems, focusing on understanding solar radiation patterns, identifying geographical influences on solar radiation, formulating a mathematical model for system optimization, and determining the optimal configuration of PV panels and pumped hydro storage. Through a comparative analysis approach and eight weeks of data collection, the study addressed key research questions related to solar radiation patterns and optimal system design. The findings highlighted regions with heightened solar radiation levels, showcasing substantial potential for power generation and emphasizing the system's efficiency. Optimizing system design significantly boosted power generation, promoted renewable energy utilization, and enhanced energy storage capacity. The study underscored the benefits of optimizing hybrid solar PV panels and pumped hydro energy supply systems for sustainable energy usage. Optimizing the design of solar PV panels and pumped hydro energy supply systems as examined across diverse climatic conditions in a developing country, not only enhances power generation but also improves the integration of renewable energy sources and boosts energy storage capacities, particularly beneficial for less economically prosperous regions. Additionally, the study provides valuable insights for advancing energy research in economically viable areas. Recommendations included conducting site-specific assessments, utilizing advanced modeling tools, implementing regular maintenance protocols, and enhancing communication among system components.
Forklift Classes Overview by Intella PartsIntella Parts
Discover the different forklift classes and their specific applications. Learn how to choose the right forklift for your needs to ensure safety, efficiency, and compliance in your operations.
For more technical information, visit our website https://intellaparts.com
NUMERICAL SIMULATIONS OF HEAT AND MASS TRANSFER IN CONDENSING HEAT EXCHANGERS...ssuser7dcef0
Power plants release a large amount of water vapor into the
atmosphere through the stack. The flue gas can be a potential
source for obtaining much needed cooling water for a power
plant. If a power plant could recover and reuse a portion of this
moisture, it could reduce its total cooling water intake
requirement. One of the most practical way to recover water
from flue gas is to use a condensing heat exchanger. The power
plant could also recover latent heat due to condensation as well
as sensible heat due to lowering the flue gas exit temperature.
Additionally, harmful acids released from the stack can be
reduced in a condensing heat exchanger by acid condensation. reduced in a condensing heat exchanger by acid condensation.
Condensation of vapors in flue gas is a complicated
phenomenon since heat and mass transfer of water vapor and
various acids simultaneously occur in the presence of noncondensable
gases such as nitrogen and oxygen. Design of a
condenser depends on the knowledge and understanding of the
heat and mass transfer processes. A computer program for
numerical simulations of water (H2O) and sulfuric acid (H2SO4)
condensation in a flue gas condensing heat exchanger was
developed using MATLAB. Governing equations based on
mass and energy balances for the system were derived to
predict variables such as flue gas exit temperature, cooling
water outlet temperature, mole fraction and condensation rates
of water and sulfuric acid vapors. The equations were solved
using an iterative solution technique with calculations of heat
and mass transfer coefficients and physical properties.
Immunizing Image Classifiers Against Localized Adversary Attacksgerogepatton
This paper addresses the vulnerability of deep learning models, particularly convolutional neural networks
(CNN)s, to adversarial attacks and presents a proactive training technique designed to counter them. We
introduce a novel volumization algorithm, which transforms 2D images into 3D volumetric representations.
When combined with 3D convolution and deep curriculum learning optimization (CLO), itsignificantly improves
the immunity of models against localized universal attacks by up to 40%. We evaluate our proposed approach
using contemporary CNN architectures and the modified Canadian Institute for Advanced Research (CIFAR-10
and CIFAR-100) and ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge (ILSVRC12) datasets, showcasing
accuracy improvements over previous techniques. The results indicate that the combination of the volumetric
input and curriculum learning holds significant promise for mitigating adversarial attacks without necessitating
adversary training.
Final project report on grocery store management system..pdfKamal Acharya
In today’s fast-changing business environment, it’s extremely important to be able to respond to client needs in the most effective and timely manner. If your customers wish to see your business online and have instant access to your products or services.
Online Grocery Store is an e-commerce website, which retails various grocery products. This project allows viewing various products available enables registered users to purchase desired products instantly using Paytm, UPI payment processor (Instant Pay) and also can place order by using Cash on Delivery (Pay Later) option. This project provides an easy access to Administrators and Managers to view orders placed using Pay Later and Instant Pay options.
In order to develop an e-commerce website, a number of Technologies must be studied and understood. These include multi-tiered architecture, server and client-side scripting techniques, implementation technologies, programming language (such as PHP, HTML, CSS, JavaScript) and MySQL relational databases. This is a project with the objective to develop a basic website where a consumer is provided with a shopping cart website and also to know about the technologies used to develop such a website.
This document will discuss each of the underlying technologies to create and implement an e- commerce website.
1. 6.1
Chapter 6 – Bulk Forming Processes (II)
Questions & Answers
Slides 6.9-6.18
Question: Would you elaborate the derivations in these slides?
Answer: The extrusion model in these slides was adapted from a well-known German
handbook in three volumes [1]1. However, the model presented by this book (see Vol. 2)
is, by and large, based on the works of Siebel [3-4]. Anyway, the given extrusion model
essentially makes good use of energy methods. The energy/work required to perform
extrusion process can be divided into four components:
1) Ideal Work: Energy required to convert the billet (area: A0; height: h0) into the
final shape of the product (area: A1; height: h1 h0A0/A1). In other words, it refers
to the energy necessary to plastically deform the billet into the final product.
2) Friction Work: Energy to overcome:
a. Friction in the die-shoulder
b. Friction inside the container
3) Shearing Work: Total energy required to shear the material plastically as it
enters and exits the die-shoulder.
4) Bending Work: It does not exist in direct/forward extrusion.
Before we proceed, a quick review on work/energy might helpful at this point. As you
might remember from your Physics courses, the work done by a force is a scalar quantity
and is measured in [J]. Work/energy is defined as the inner product of a force vector (F)
and a displacement vector (s). That is,
𝑊 = 𝑭 ⋅ 𝒔 = |𝑭||𝒔| cos(𝜃) = 𝐹𝑠 cos(𝜃) (6.1)
where is the angle between the vectors. If the force is a function of displacement, the
work done by the force takes the following form:
𝑊 = ∫ 𝑭(𝒔) ⋅ 𝑑𝒔 (6.2)
Recall that
If W > 0, force transfers some energy to the system under study;
If W = 0, no energy is exchanged;
If W < 0, some energy is absorbed or taken away from the system.
Armed with this information, let us elaborate the above-mentioned energy components:
1 In 1994, the Society of Manufacturing Engineers (SME) published the English translation of this handbook:
See Ref. [2].
2. 6.2
1. Ideal Work (Slides 6.9-6.11):
To compute the ideal work component, we shall consider an infinitesimal disc element
inside the die shoulder (where plastic deformation is taking place). Under the action of
stresses acting on this element (i.e. radial- and axial stresses: r and z), it will be
displaced while changing its overall shape as illustrated in Fig. 6.1.
A0
A1
Deformation
Region
Initial Position
Final Position
Die
r
z
Δz
Δz+d(Δz)
r
r-dr
Area: A
Figure 6.1: Slab model for the die shoulder [1].
The stresses on the disc is shown in Fig. 6.2. In our derivations, we shall assume that
z > 0 is the maximum principal stress component (1)2;
r < 0 is the minimum one (3).
σz
σz
σr σr
dr
d(Δz)/2
d(Δz)/2
Final
Initial
Figure 6.2: Stresses and deformations on the disc elements.
Now, let us write the energy required to deform this disc element to its final shape. For
this purpose, we shall compute the work done by every force component acting on the disc:
𝑑𝑊ideal = (𝜎𝑟2𝜋𝑟Δ𝑧)
⏟
radial force
𝑑𝑟
⏟
rad.
disp.
+ (𝜎𝑧𝐴)
⏟
axial
force (up)
𝑑(Δ𝑧)
2
⏟
axial
disp.
+ (𝜎𝑧𝐴)
⏟
axial
force (down)
𝑑(Δ𝑧)
2
⏟
axial
disp.
(6.3)
Thus, it becomes
2 In extrusion, z is known to be compressive. However, the assumption that z > 0 does not alter the nature
of the derivations as long as one carries out the computations consistently in accordance with the assumptions
adopted.
3. 6.3
𝑑𝑊ideal = 𝜎𝑟2𝜋𝑟Δ𝑧 𝑑𝑟 + 𝜎𝑧𝐴 𝑑(Δ𝑧) (6.4)
Recall that the area of disc element initially is
𝐴 = 𝜋𝑟2
(6.5)
As the disc deforms to its final shape, the change in the area3 (dA) can be calculated by
differentiating Eqn. (6.5):
𝑑𝐴 = 2𝜋𝑟 𝑑𝑟 (6.6)
Substituting Eqn. (6.6) into (6.4) actually eliminates r:
𝑑𝑊ideal = 𝜎𝑟Δ𝑧𝑑𝐴 + 𝜎𝑧𝐴 𝑑(Δ𝑧) (6.7)
Now, we can calculate the change in thickness [d(z)] by considering the volume
constancy:
Δ𝑉 = 𝐴Δ𝑧 = constant (6.8)
Taking the differential of Eqn. (6.8) yields
d(Δ𝑉) = 𝐴 𝑑(Δ𝑧) + 𝑑𝐴 Δ𝑧 = 0 (6.9)
By rearranging Eqn. (6.9), we obtain
d(Δ𝑧) = −
𝑑𝐴
𝐴
Δ𝑧 (6.10)
Plugging Eqn. (6.10) into (6.7) leads to
𝑑𝑊ideal = (𝜎𝑟 − 𝜎𝑧)Δ𝑧 𝑑𝐴 (6.11)
It would be convenient to express Eqn. (6.11) in terms of V (rather than z). By
employing Eqn. (6.8), we get
𝑑𝑊ideal = (𝜎𝑟 − 𝜎𝑧)
𝑑𝐴
𝐴
ΔV (6.12)
Now, let us define infinitesimal specific ideal work4:
𝑑𝑤ideal ≜
𝑑𝑊ideal
ΔV
= (𝜎𝑟 − 𝜎𝑧)
𝑑𝐴
𝐴
(6.13)
Since the disc element is plastically deforming, Tresca yield criterion must be satisfied:
𝜎1 − 𝜎3 = 𝜎𝑓 ≅ 𝑌𝑆 (6.14)
That is,
𝜎𝑧 − 𝜎𝑟 = 𝜎𝑓 (6.15)
3 In our case, dA (or dr) must be a negative quantity indicating a decrease in the final area. We accommodated
that fact by changing the sign of dr in Fig. 6.1. That is, we have modified the direction of radial displacement
vector in Fig. 6.2 such that r and dr point the same direction (i.e. towards the center of the die).
4 This definition is very similar to those in Thermodynamics. For instance, specific heat capacity (c) is defined
by dividing the heat capacity of the substance (C) by the sample’s mass (m).
4. 6.4
Combining Eqn. (6.13) and (6.15) results in
𝑑𝑤ideal = −𝜎𝑓
𝑑𝐴
𝐴
(6.16)
If Eqn. (6.16) is integrated, the specific ideal work is calculated:
𝑤ideal = ∫ −𝜎𝑓
𝐴1
𝐴0
𝑑𝐴
𝐴
(6.17)
Due to strain-hardening, the flow stress of the material (f) is to change as a function of
the area: 𝜎𝑓 = 𝐾 [ln (
𝐴0
𝐴
)]
𝑛
. Thus, evaluating the definite integral in Eqn. (6.17) would be
a challenging task (at least, analytically!). For all practical purposes, Siebel [3-4]
presumes that a constant mean flow stress (fm) can be utilized instead of a flow stress
that changes constantly. Hence, Eqn. (6.17) becomes
𝑤ideal = −𝜎𝑓𝑚 ∫
𝑑𝐴
𝐴
𝐴1
𝐴0
= 𝜎𝑓𝑚𝑙𝑛 (
𝐴0
𝐴1
) = 𝜎𝑓𝑚𝜀𝑒𝑞 (6.18)
Here, the mean flow stress5 is computed as follows:
𝜎𝑓𝑚 ≅
𝜎𝑓0 + 𝜎𝑓1
2
(6.19)
where f0 is the initial flow stress of the (annealed) material while f1 = K(eq)n refers to
the strength of work-hardened material at the exit. Finally, the overall ideal work turns
out to be
𝑊ideal = 𝑉𝑤ideal = 𝑉𝜎𝑓𝑚𝜀𝑒𝑞 (6.20)
Notice that V here denotes the volume of the material that has passed through the die-
shoulder. That is, it intrinsically refers to the volume of the extruded material at a
particular position of the ram and can be expressed as a function of the ram’s stroke (s):
𝑉(𝑠) = 𝐴0𝑠 (6.21)
where 0 s h0.
2.a Friction Work at Die-shoulder (Slides 6.12-6.14):
As highlighted in Slide 6.12, Siebel [3-4] makes the following assumptions to compute
work done against friction:
Pressure acting on the walls of the container is in the order of initial flow stress:
f0
Pressure on the walls of the die shoulder is about the mean flow stress: fm
5 This definition is pivotal in his derivation as it will be also employed in the later stages (i.e. shear energy
computation). Therefore, it is not recommended to utilize any other mean flow stress formulations when using
this mathematical model.
5. 6.5
With these assumptions, the work done by the friction forces inside the die shoulder can
be conveniently estimated. To this end, we shall utilize the friction model shown in Fig.
6.3. The infinitesimal work done against the friction on the die-shoulder can be written
as
𝑑𝑊friction
die shoulder
= [𝜇𝜎𝑓𝑚
2πrΔ𝑠
cos(𝛼)
]
⏟
friction force
𝑑𝑧
cos(𝛼)
⏟
displacement
(6.22)
Note that the work done by the friction force itself is less than zero because the angle
between the friction force vector and the corresponding displacement vector is 180 in Fig.
6.3 [also refer to Eqn. (6.1)]. That is, the friction process is absorbing energy as expected.
On the other hand, since we are interested in the work done against the friction, the sign
of Eqn. (6.22) is modified accordingly.
A0
A1
Deformation
Region
Initial Position
Final Position
Die
Δs
dz
α
Δs/cos(α)
dz/cos(α)
r
Figure 6.3: Friction model for the die-shoulder [1].
To eliminate dz in Eqn. (6.22), the differential change in the area (dA) is considered:
𝑑𝐴 = 𝜋[𝑟 − 𝑑𝑧 ⋅ 𝑡𝑎𝑛(𝛼)]2
⏟
final
− 𝜋𝑟2
⏟
initial
≅ −2𝜋𝑟 ⋅ 𝑑𝑧 ⋅ 𝑡𝑎𝑛(𝛼) (6.23)
Hence,
𝑑𝑧 = −
𝑑𝐴
2𝜋𝑟 ⋅ 𝑡𝑎𝑛(𝛼)
(6.24)
Note that the thickness of the disc can be expressed in terms of its volume (V):
Δ𝑠 =
Δ𝑉
𝐴
(6.25)
Plugging Eqns. (6.24) and (6.25) into (6.22) yields
𝑑𝑤friction
die shoulder
≜
𝑑𝑊friction
die shoulder
Δ𝑉
= −
𝜇𝜎𝑓𝑚
sin(𝛼) cos(𝛼)
𝑑𝐴
𝐴
(6.26)
Similarly, integration of Eqn. (6.26) leads to
6. 6.6
𝑤friction
die shoulder
= −
𝜇 𝜎𝑓𝑚
sin(𝛼) cos(𝛼)
⏟
sin(2𝛼)/2
∫
𝑑𝐴
𝐴
𝐴1
𝐴0
=
2𝜇 𝜎𝑓𝑚
sin(2𝛼)
𝑙𝑛 (
𝐴0
𝐴1
)
⏟
𝜀𝑒𝑞
= 𝜎𝑓𝑚𝜀𝑒𝑞
2𝜇
sin(2𝛼) (6.27)
Consequently, total friction work at the die-shoulder takes the following form:
𝑊friction
die shoulder
= 𝑉 𝑤friction
die shoulder
= 𝑉𝜎𝑓𝑚𝜀𝑒𝑞
2𝜇
sin(2𝛼)
(6.28)
2.b Friction Work at Container (Slide 6.15):
Next, we shall take a close look at the container friction. The derivation is somewhat
similar to the one discussed in the previous section. Consider the friction model in Fig.
6.4.
Initial Position
Final Position
ds
σf0
μσf0 μσf0
σf0
d0
RAM
h
0
h
s
dz
z
Figure 6.4: Friction model for the container [1].
The infinitesimal work done against the friction inside the container can be written as
𝑑𝑊friction
container
= ∫ 𝜇𝜎𝑓0πd0dz
ℎ
𝑧=0
⏟
friction force
ds
⏟
incr. disp.
of the ram
(6.29)
Again, the discussion in Section 2.a (about the sign of the work done) is applicable here
as well. Hence, Eqn. (6.29) becomes
𝑑𝑊friction
container
= 𝜇𝜎𝑓0πd0h ds (6.30)
Since the displacement of the ram is, by definition, s = h0 – h; differentiating this term
yields ds = –dh. By substituting ds = –dh into Eqn. (6.30) and integrating the resulting
expression, we get
𝑊friction
container
(ℎ) = −𝜇𝜎𝑓0πd0 ∫ ℎ𝑑ℎ
ℎ
ℎ0
=
1
2
πd0(𝜇𝜎𝑓0) (ℎ0
2
− ℎ2
)
⏟
(ℎ0−ℎ)(ℎ0+ℎ)
(6.31)
7. 6.7
Eqn. (6.31) takes the following form in terms of s:
𝑊friction
container
(𝑠) =
1
2
πd0(𝜇𝜎𝑓0)(2ℎ0 − 𝑠)𝑠 (6.32)
3. Shearing Work (Slides 6.16-6.17):
When the material enters the die-shoulder area, the cylindrical shape quickly morphs into
a cone. Similarly, the cone inside the die-shoulder must be transformed back to a cylinder
at the die exit. Hence, a shearing work is necessary to carry out these shape
transformations. For this purpose, let us consider a (differential) disc element that has
entered to the die shoulder as demonstrated in Fig. 6.5.
Δs
α
γ
r
s
dA
τmax0
r0 Δs tan(γ)
γ
τmax0
Die
dr
Deformation
Region
cone center
Figure 6.5: Shear model for the inlet [1].
On this disc, we shall take into consideration a differential ring element as illustrated in
the figure. As the disc enters the inlet of the die-shoulder, the ring will distort under the
action of shear stresses. The work done by the shearing forces can be simply expressed as
Δ𝑊shear0 = ∫ Δ𝑠 tan(𝛾)
⏟
radial
displacement
τmax02πr dr
⏟
shearing force
𝑟0
0
(6.33)
Since the material is plastically shorn at the inlet, (according to Tresca) the maximum
shear stress becomes
τmax0 = τyield ≅ 𝜎𝑓0/2 (6.34)
From the given geometry, we have
tan(𝛾) =
𝑟
𝑠
(6.35)
Substituting Eqns. (6.34) and (6.35) into (6.33) and integrating the resulting expression
lead to
Δ𝑊shear0 =
1
3
π𝜎𝑓0Δ𝑠
𝑟0
3
𝑠
=
1
3
𝜎𝑓0Δ𝑠 π𝑟0
2
⏟
𝐴
𝑟0
𝑠
⏟
tan(𝛼)
=
1
3
𝜎𝑓0 Δ𝑠 𝐴 tan(𝛼) (6.36)
8. 6.8
Recall that the volume of the disc element is
ΔV = Δ𝑠 𝐴 (6.37)
Hence, Eqn. (6.37) boils down to
Δ𝑊shear0 =
1
3
𝜎𝑓0 Δ𝑉 tan(𝛼) (6.38)
Similarly, the specific work at the inlet turns out to be
Δ𝑤shear0 ≜
Δ𝑊shear0
Δ𝑉
=
1
3
𝜎𝑓0 tan(𝛼) (6.39)
It is self-evident that the analysis conducted above can be easily extended to the die exit.
The result would be quite identical to Eqn. (6.39) except that the flow stress at the exit is
f1 (rather than f0). Consequently, the specific work at the exit becomes
Δ𝑤shear1 =
1
3
𝜎𝑓1 tan(𝛼) (6.40)
Adding Eqns. (6.39) and (6.40) gives the combined specific shearing energy:
Δ𝑤shear = Δ𝑤shear0 + Δ𝑤shear1 =
2
3
(
𝜎𝑓0 + 𝜎𝑓1
2
)
⏟
𝜎𝑓𝑚
tan(𝛼) =
2
3
𝜎𝑓𝑚 tan(𝛼)
(6.41)
Hence, total shearing energy boils down to
𝑊shear = Δ𝑤shear𝑉 =
2
3
𝑉 𝜎𝑓𝑚 tan(𝛼) (6.42)
Total Work and Extrusion Force (Slide 6.18)
Total work in forward extrusion as function of s can be obtained by combining Eqns. (6.20),
(6.28), (6.32), and (6.42):
𝑊total(s) = A0𝑠
⏟
𝑉
𝜎𝑓𝑚 [
2
3
tan(𝛼) + (1 +
2𝜇
sin(2𝛼)
) 𝜀𝑒𝑞] +
1
2
𝜋𝑑0(𝜇𝜎𝑓0)(2ℎ0 − 𝑠)𝑠 (6.43)
Taking the derivative of Wtotal with respect to s yields the extrusion force:
𝑑𝑊total
𝑑𝑠
= Ftotal(s) = A0𝜎𝑓𝑚 [
2
3
tan(𝛼) + (1 +
2𝜇
sin(2𝛼)
) 𝜀𝑒𝑞]
⏟
𝐹
̅
+ 𝜋𝑑0(𝜇𝜎𝑓0)(ℎ0 − 𝑠)
⏟
𝐹friction
container
(𝑠)
(6.44)
Note that since s = h0 – h,
𝐹friction
container
= 𝜋𝑑0ℎ𝜇𝜎𝑓0 (6.45)
In fact, Eqn. (6.45) could be directly obtained with the utilization of Eqn. (6.30).
Consequently, we have
Ftotal(h) = A0𝜎𝑓𝑚 [
2
3
tan(𝛼) + (1 +
2𝜇
sin(2𝛼)
) 𝜀𝑒𝑞]
⏟
𝐹
̅ (constant)
+ 𝜋𝑑0ℎ𝜇𝜎𝑓0
⏟
𝐹friction
container
(ℎ)
(6.46)
9. 6.9
Slide 6.19
Question: Would you give an example on the application of the presented extrusion
model?
Answer: Let us do the example (Example 1) in this slide. The given data are as follows:
f0 = 240 [MPa]
K = 700 [MPa]
n = 0.24
= 0.06
= 45
d0 = 75 [mm]
d1 = 45 [mm]
h0 = 110 [mm]
Let us start our calculations by finding the necessary quantities for Eqn. (6.46):
𝜀𝑒𝑞 = 𝑙𝑛 (
𝐴0
𝐴1
) = 𝑙𝑛 (
𝑑0
2
𝑑1
2) = 𝑙𝑛 (
752
452) = 1.0217
𝐴0 =
𝜋𝑑0
2
4
= 𝜋
752
4
= 4418 [mm2
]
𝜎𝑓1 = 𝐾(𝜀𝑒𝑞)
𝑛
= 700(1.0217)0.24
≅ 704 [MPa]
𝜎𝑓𝑚 =
𝜎𝑓0 + 𝜎𝑓1
2
=
240 + 704
2
≅ 472 [MPa]
For h = h0 (the worst case!), we can compute the extrusion force using Eqn. (6.46):
Ftotal(h0) = A0𝜎𝑓𝑚 [
2
3
tan(𝛼) + (1 +
2𝜇
sin(2𝛼)
) 𝜀𝑒𝑞] + 𝜋𝑑0ℎ0𝜇𝜎𝑓0
Ftotal = 4418 ⋅ 472 [
2
3
tan(45𝑜) + (1 +
2 ⋅ 0.06
sin(90𝑜)
) 1.0217] + 𝜋 ⋅ 75 ⋅ 110 ⋅ 0.06 ⋅ 240
Ftotal = 4418 ⋅ 472 [
2
3
tan(45𝑜) + (1 +
2 ⋅ 0.06
sin(90𝑜)
) 1.0217]
⏟
F
̅ = 3.775 [MN]
+ 𝜋 ⋅ 75 ⋅ 110 ⋅ 0.06 ⋅ 240
⏟
Ffriction
container
= 0.373 [MN]
Consequently, we have
Ftotal = 4.148 [MN]
Here are some interesting facts about the extrusion process [5]:
1. There is no limit imposed on the extrusion ratio (A0/A1) because all principal stress
components are compressive (see Chapter 5 – the discussion about bulk
formability). The strength of the die material often times becomes the limiting
factor.
For hard materials, the extrusion ratio in practice is 20:1
For aluminum, it can be as high as 100:1
2. For good efficiency at large reductions, the die angle () must be increased.
3. Good lubrication is needed to improve the efficiency of the extrusion process:
For cold-extrusion of steel, the lubricant is generally graphite.
For hot-extrusion of steel, glass based lubricants are utilized.
10. 6.10
Slide 6.20
Question: Would you explain the extrusion force calculations using empirical techniques?
Answer: The empirical model given in this slide is presented in Section 4.5.5 of Ref. [6].
However, there are some minor notational changes. We start our computation by
calculating the extrusion ratio:
𝑅𝑒 =
𝐴0
𝐴1
(6.47)
Next is the equivalent strain:
𝜀𝑒𝑞 = ln(𝑅𝑒) (6.48)
Then, the mean flow stress needs to be determined. For cold-extrusion,
𝜎𝑓𝑚 =
𝐾(𝜀𝑒𝑞)
𝑛
𝑛 + 1
(6.49)
For hot extrusion, it is
𝜎𝑓𝑚 = 𝐶(𝜀̇𝑚)𝑚
(6.50)
where 𝜀̇𝑚 is the mean strain rate. To calculate this quantity, let us find the material’s
velocity in the axial direction (z) inside the deformation zone. By considering volume
constancy [e.g. 𝑣(𝑧) ⋅ 𝐴(𝑧) = 𝑣𝑝𝑢𝑛𝑐ℎ𝐴0], we have
𝑣(𝑧) =
𝑣𝑝𝑢𝑛𝑐ℎ𝑑0
2
[𝑑0 − 2𝑧 𝑡𝑎𝑛(𝛼)]2
(6.51)
where is the cone angle and 0 ≤ 𝑧 ≤
𝑑0−𝑑1
2tan(𝛼)
. The travel time of the material between the
inlet and the exit can be expressed as follows:
∫ 𝑑𝑡
Δ𝑡
0
= ∫
𝑑𝑧
𝑣(𝑧)
𝑑0−𝑑1
2tan(𝛼)
0
=
1
𝑣𝑝𝑢𝑛𝑐ℎ𝑑0
2 ∫ [𝑑0 − 2𝑧 ⋅ 𝑡𝑎𝑛(𝛼)]2
𝑑𝑧
𝑑0−𝑑1
2tan(𝛼)
0
(6.52)
Hence, evaluating the integral in Eqn. (6.52) yields
Δ𝑡 =
𝑑0
3
− 𝑑1
3
6 𝑣𝑝𝑢𝑛𝑐ℎ𝑑0
2
𝑡𝑎𝑛(𝛼)
(6.53)
As an alternative approach, one can consider the time to fill up the volume of the
deformation zone (i.e. the volume of a truncated cone) when the material is presumed to
be flowing at constant rate of 𝑄 = 𝑣𝑝𝑢𝑛𝑐ℎ𝐴0 [m3/s]:
Δ𝑡 =
𝑉
𝑄
=
1
3 ∙
𝜋𝑑0
2
4
⏞
𝐵𝑎𝑠𝑒 𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑎
∙
𝑑0
2 tan(𝛼)
⏞
𝐻𝑒𝑖𝑔ℎ𝑡
−
1
3 ∙
𝜋𝑑1
2
4 ∙
𝑑1
2 tan(𝛼)
⏞
𝑉𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑚𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑒
𝜋𝑑0
2
4 ∙ 𝑣𝑝𝑢𝑛𝑐ℎ
=
𝑑0
3
− 𝑑1
3
6 𝑣𝑝𝑢𝑛𝑐ℎ𝑑0
2
𝑡𝑎𝑛(𝛼)
(6.54)
11. 6.11
Consequently, Eqn. (4-33) of Ref. [6] is obtained:
𝜀̇𝑚 ≅
Δ𝜀𝑒𝑞
Δ𝑡
=
𝜀𝑒𝑞 − 0
Δ𝑡
=
6 𝑣𝑝𝑢𝑛𝑐ℎ𝑑0
2
𝑡𝑎𝑛(𝛼)
𝑑0
3
− 𝑑1
3 𝜀𝑒𝑞 (6.55)
Once the mean flow stress is computed, the average extrusion found is found:
𝐹
̅ = 𝜎𝑓𝑚 Qe A0 (6.56)
where the strain factor Qe is given as
Qe = 0.8 + 1.2𝜀𝑒𝑞 (6.57)
Note that Eqn. (6.57) is generally referred to as Johnson’s extrusion strain formula
(see Eqn. (18.22) of Ref. [7]). If desired, the container friction force [i.e. Eqn. (6.45)] can be
added to Eqn. (6.56) for direct/forward extrusion.
Please note that the backward extrusion process resembles the constrained piercing
operation (Slide 6.26). Consequently, this condition must be checked by computing the
corresponding piercing force. If the piercing force is found to be smaller than its
counterpart in Eqn. (6.56), the piercing will essentially take place.
12. 6.12
Slide 6.21
Question: Is there an analytical model to calculate the force in wire/bar drawing?
Answer: Yes, indeed. The model elaborated in the previous slides (e.g. Siebel’s forward
extrusion model) can be directly adopted for this purpose. The result can be given as
follows:
Fdraw = A1𝜎𝑓𝑚 [
2
3
tan(𝛼) + (1 +
2𝜇
sin(2𝛼)
) 𝜀𝑒𝑞] (6.58)
Note that apart from wire/rod drawing, we can easily extend this basic model to the other
extrusion processes as well. Please refer to Slide 6.28 for more information.
Question: Would you explain the draw force calculations using empirical techniques?
Answer: The empirical model given in this slide is presented in Section 4.7.2 of Ref. [6].
However, there are some minor notational changes. Anyway, consider the wire/rod
drawing process in Fig. 6.6. The empirical expression for the axial stress at the exit (z1)
is
𝜎𝑧1 = 𝜎𝑓𝑚𝜀𝑒𝑞𝜑[1 + 𝜇 ⋅ cot(𝛼)] (6.59)
where 𝜀𝑒𝑞 = ln (
𝐴0
𝐴1
) = 2 ln (
𝑑0
𝑑1
). The deformation factor in Eqn. (6.59) is defined as
𝜑 = {
0.88 + 0.12
ℎ
𝐿
, for axisymmetric / round parts
0.8 + 0.2
ℎ
𝐿
, for plane strain / rectangular parts
(6.60)
where is ℎ =
𝑑0+𝑑1
2
is the mean diameter/thickness while 𝐿 =
𝑑0−𝑑1
2 sin(𝛼)
denotes the length of
the draw die. Consequently, the draw force becomes
𝐹𝑑𝑟𝑎𝑤 = 𝐴1𝜎𝑧1 (6.61)
Notice that h/L plays a key role on the performance of the process. If (h/L > 2), the center-
burst (Chevroning or Arrowhead) defect as shown in Fig. 6.7 is commonly observed
(also see Chapter 5 Q&A – the discussion for Slide 6.10).
Die
Deformation
Region
d0
α
d1
σz1
Figure 6.6: Wire/rod drawing process. Figure 6.7: Center-burst defect.
13. 6.13
Slide 6.22
Question: Would you give an example on the application of the presented empirical model
on wire drawing process?
Answer: Consider the problem (Example 2) in this slide. The given data are as follows:
K = 1300 [MPa]
n = 0.3
= 0.04
= 6
d0 = 3 [mm]
A1 = 5 [mm2]
v1 = 2 [m/s]
First of all, we shall take a look at the analytical model given by Eqn. (6.47). The unknown
quantities are calculated as follows:
𝑑1 = √
4𝐴1
𝜋
= 2.52 [mm]
𝜀𝑒𝑞 = 2 𝑙𝑛 (
𝑑0
𝑑1
) = 2 𝑙𝑛 (
3
2.52
) = 0.3462
Since f0 is not specified in the problem statement, we shall (reluctantly!) compute the
mean flow stress using the expression in Slide 4.17:
𝜎𝑓𝑚 =
𝐾(𝜀𝑒𝑞)
𝑛
𝑛 + 1
=
1300(0.3462)0.3
1.3
= 727 [MPa]
Hence, the drawing force becomes
Fdraw = 5 ⋅ 727 [
2
3
tan(6°) + (1 +
2 ⋅ 0.04
sin(12°)
) 0.3462]
Fdraw ≅ 2000 [N]
Similarly, the drawing power can be calculated as
Pdraw = Fdrawv1 = 2000 ⋅ 2 ≅ 4 [kW]
Now, let us employ the empirical model. First, calculate all the unknown quantities:
ℎ =
𝑑0 + 𝑑1
2
=
3 + 2.52
2
= 2.76 [mm]
𝐿 =
𝑑0 − 𝑑1
2 sin(𝛼)
=
3 − 2.52
2 sin(6°)
= 2.3 [mm]
For round part, we have
𝜑 = 0.88 + 0.12
ℎ
𝐿
= 0.88 + 0.12
2.76
2.3
= 1.024
Consequently,
𝜎𝑧1 = 𝜎𝑓𝑚𝜀𝑒𝑞𝜑[1 + 𝜇 ⋅ cot(𝛼)]
𝜎𝑧1 = 727 ⋅ 0.3462 ⋅ 1.024[1 + 0.04 ⋅ cot(6°)] = 356 [MPa]
14. 6.14
The drawing force becomes
Fdraw = σz1A1 = 356 ⋅ 5 = 1780 [N]
Likewise, the power is
Pdraw = Fdrawv1 = 1780 ⋅ 2 ≅ 3.6 [kW]
As can be seen, the analytical results and the empirical ones are in good agreement.
Now, a feasibility check is in order. After pointing (see page 265 of Ref. [6] and page 473
of Ref. [7]), the material may fail to deform plastically inside the die due to high friction.
Under the action of the capstan pulling the wire, the cold-worked wire might yield and
plastically elongate outside of the die (just like a specimen under uniaxial tension).
To check this condition, let us compute the yield strength of the cold-worked wire at the
exit:
𝑌𝑆𝑐𝑤 ≅ 𝜎𝑓1 = 𝐾(𝜀𝑒𝑞)
𝑛
= 1300(0.3462)0.3
≅ 946 [MPa]
The minimum drawing force, which starts to deform the drawn wire, becomes
Fmin = σf1A1 = 946 ⋅ 5 = 4.74 [kN]
Since Fdraw (1.78 kN) < Fmin (4.74 kN), the wire deforms inside the die before its gets to
elongate at the exit. Therefore, the operation is feasible.
Here are some limitations of the wire drawing process [6]:
1. To avoid center-burst defect, h/L must be less than 2. (In this example, it is only
1.2.)
2. To reduce the frequent breaking of the wire, the area reduction (per die) must be
kept below 30%.
3. Good lubrication is needed to decrease the drawing force.
15. 6.15
Slides 6.23-6.25
Question: Would you elaborate the derivations in these slides?
Answer: The backward can impact extrusion model in these slides was again adapted
from Ref. [1]. This time, Lange [1] presents a model that comes from the Ph.D.
dissertation of Dipper [8]. The analytical model, which makes good use of slab method, is
quite easy to understand. Despite its sheer simplicity, the force estimates of the model
are in very good agreement with experimental ones especially for thin-walled extrusions.
Before we continue, let us briefly discuss the limitation of this model: In backward can
extrusion, the relative area reduction is defined as
𝜀𝐴 ≜
𝐴0 − 𝐴1
𝐴0
= 1 −
1
𝑅𝑒
(6.62)
where A0 is the area of the billet; A1 refers to the cross-section of the extruded product; Re
denotes the reduction ratio in Eqn. (6.47). Hence, Eqn. (6.62) boils down to
𝜀𝐴 ≜
𝑑𝑒
2
− (𝑑𝑒
2
− 𝑑𝑖
2
)
𝑑𝑒
2
=
𝑑𝑖
2
𝑑𝑒
2
(6.63)
Dipper’s backward can extrusion model yields accurate results when 0.5 ≤ 𝜀𝐴 ≤ 0.6.
Notice that as 𝜀𝐴 increases, the wall thickness of the extruded can (~
𝑑𝑒−𝑑𝑖
2
) decreases.
Therefore, as confirmed by experimental studies, the analytical model presented here is
mostly applicable to thin-walled cans.
As illustrated in Fig. 6.8, the deformation zone is divided into three portions:
1. Zone 1: Material is upset between ram/punch and the die.
2. Zone 2: Material, which is compressed sideways, is plastically flowing in the
upwards direction.
3. Zone 3: Material in this zone essentially forms the wall of the can. Since the
plastic deformation is presumed to terminate at the interface between Zone 2 and
Zone 3, this zone is free from any plastic deformation and does not bear any
load/stress.
Ram
Zone 1
di
Die
d0 = de
Zone
3
Zone
3
Zone 2
Zone 2
b
s
s
z
dz
r dr
Figure 6.8: Nomenclature for the backward can extrusion process.
16. 6.16
The analysis starts with Zone 2 and works its way up to Zone 1. In Zone 2, a differential
ring element is considered as illustrated in Figs. 6.8 and 6.9.
dz
σr2
σr2
σr2
σz2+dσz2
σz2
σr2
σf2/2
μ1σf2 σf2/2 μ1σf2
σz2
σz2+dσz2
di/2
de/2
Figure 6.9: Stresses on the differential ring element (Zone 2).
The axial force equilibrium for this element can be written as
[(𝜎𝑧2 + d𝜎𝑧2) − 𝜎𝑧2]
⏟
Net axial stress
[
𝜋(𝑑𝑒
2
− 𝑑𝑖
2
)
4
]
⏟
Area
= μ1𝜎𝑓2(𝜋𝑑𝑒𝑑𝑧)
⏟
Friction force
(Die side)
+
𝜎𝑓2
2
⏞
𝜏𝑦𝑖𝑒𝑙𝑑
(𝜋𝑑𝑖𝑑𝑧)
⏟
Friction force
(Zone 1 boundary)
(6.64)
where μ1 refers to the kinematic friction coefficient between the die and the workpiece
material. The inner surface of the ring (i.e. the boundary between Zones 1 and 2) is
subjected to plastic shearing. Consequently, the shear stress is taken as 𝜏𝑦𝑖𝑒𝑙𝑑 =
𝜎𝑓2
2
. It is
critical to note that while estimating Coulomb friction forces, the normal stresses (like
𝜎𝑟2) are not employed for the sake of simplicity. Just like the assumptions in Slide 6.12,
the pressures on the walls of the die/punch are presumed to be on the order of the flow
stress of the material at a specific zone.
Rearranging Eqn. (6.64) yields
d𝜎𝑧2
𝜋 (𝑑𝑒 − 𝑑𝑖)
⏞
2𝑠
(𝑑𝑒 + 𝑑𝑖)
⏞
2(𝑑𝑖+𝑠)
4
= π𝜎𝑓2dz [ μ1 (𝑑𝑖 + 2𝑠)
⏞
𝑑𝑒
+
1
2
𝑑𝑖]
(6.65)
That is,
d𝜎𝑧2𝜋 2𝑠
𝑑𝑖 + 𝑠
2
= π𝜎𝑓2dz (μ1𝑑𝑖 + μ1𝑠 + μ1𝑠
⏞
~
1
2
𝑠
+
1
2
𝑑𝑖) (6.66)
For the sake of simplifying Eqn. (6.66), the term μ1𝑠 is replaced by 1
2
𝑠. Consequently, we
get
d𝜎𝑧2𝜋 2𝑠
𝑑𝑖 + 𝑠
2
= 2π𝜎𝑓2dz
μ1 + 1
2
2
⏟
≜ 𝜇
∙
𝑑𝑖 + 𝑠
2
⏟
average
radius
∙ 2
(6.67)
Here, 𝜇 ≜
1
2
(μ1 + 1
2
) is called the effective coefficient of friction. Finally, Eqn. (6.67)
boils down to the following differential equation:
d𝜎𝑧2𝑠 = 2𝜇𝜎𝑓2dz (6.68)
Integrating Eqn. (6.68) yields
17. 6.17
∫ d𝜎𝑧2 =
2𝜇𝜎𝑓2
𝑠
∫ dz (6.69a)
∴ 𝜎𝑧2 =
2𝜇𝜎𝑓2
𝑠
𝑧 + C (6.69b)
To compute the integration constant C in Eqn. (6.69b), a boundary condition is needed.
Recall that Zone 3 is presumed not to carry any axial stress. Therefore, 𝜎𝑧2 = 0 at the
boundary between these two neighboring zones (i.e. z = b). Thus,
C = −
2𝜇𝜎𝑓2
𝑠
𝑏 (6.70)
Evidently, Eqn. (6.69b) becomes
𝜎𝑧2 = −
2𝜇𝜎𝑓2
𝑠
(𝑏 − 𝑧) (6.71)
Note that since the ring element inside Zone 2 is plastically deforming altogether, we can
determine the radial stress component (𝜎𝑟2) by applying Tresca yield criterion. As shown
in Slide 6.23 (see estimated stress distributions at each zone), Dipper assumes that
𝜎1 = 𝜎𝑧2 and 𝜎3 = 𝜎𝑟2. Hence,
𝜎1 − 𝜎3 = 𝜎𝑧2 − 𝜎𝑟2 = 𝜎𝑓2 (6.72a)
∴ 𝜎𝑟2 = 𝜎𝑧2 − 𝜎𝑓2 (6.72b)
Using Eqn. (6.71), the mean axial stress6 can be computed:
𝜎𝑧2|𝑧=𝑏 2
⁄ = 𝜎𝑧2𝑚 = −𝜇𝜎𝑓2
𝑏
𝑠
(6.73)
Plugging Eqn. (6.73) into (6.72b) yields the mean radial stress in Zone 2:
𝜎𝑟2|𝑧=𝑏 2
⁄
⏟
𝜎𝑟2𝑚
= 𝜎𝑧2|𝑧=𝑏 2
⁄
⏟
𝜎𝑧2𝑚
− 𝜎𝑓2
(6.74a)
∴ 𝜎𝑟2𝑚 = −𝜎𝑓2 (1 + 𝜇
𝑏
𝑠
) (6.74b)
Now, we can proceed to Zone 1. To this end, a differential ring element in Fig. 6.8 is
considered. Fig. 6.10 shows the stresses acting on this element. The radial force
equilibrium for the differential ring takes the following form:
[(𝜎𝑟1 + d𝜎𝑟1) − 𝜎𝑟1]
⏟
Net radial stress
2𝜋𝑟𝑏
⏟
Area
= 2μ1𝜎𝑓1(2𝜋𝑟𝑑𝑟)
⏟
Total friction force
(6.75)
Simplifying this equation leads to
d𝜎𝑟1 =
2μ1𝜎𝑓1
𝑏
𝑑𝑟 (6.76)
By integrating Eqn. (6.76), we have
6 Since z2 changes linearly, the mean value (z2m) resides in the middle of its domain (z = b/2).
18. 6.18
𝜎𝑟1 =
2μ1𝜎𝑓1
𝑏
𝑟 + 𝐶 (6.77)
To determine the integration constant C in Eqn. (6.77), we shall consider the interface
between the adjacent zones.
σ
r1
+dσ
r1
σz1
σr1
μ1σf1
r σz1
μ1σf1
σz1
μ1σf1
σz1
μ1σf1
σ
r1
+dσ
r1
b
dr
σr1
Figure 6.10: Stresses on the differential ring element (Zone 1).
For that purpose, the transposition of the average radial stresses from Zone 2 to Zone 1 is
assumed. That is,
𝜎𝑟1|𝑟=𝑑𝑖 2
⁄ =
2μ1𝜎𝑓1
𝑏
⋅
𝑑𝑖
2
+ 𝐶 = 𝜎𝑟2𝑚 (6.78a)
∴ 𝐶 = 𝜎𝑟2𝑚 − μ1𝜎𝑓1
𝑑𝑖
𝑏
(6.78b)
Evidently,
𝜎𝑟1 =
2μ1𝜎𝑓1
𝑏
(𝑟 −
𝑑𝑖
2
) + 𝜎𝑟2𝑚 (6.79)
The axial stress component (i.e. the pressure on the ram/punch) can be determined by
applying Tresca yield criterion to the ring element. With the assumption 𝜎1 = 𝜎𝑟1 and
𝜎3 = 𝜎𝑧1, we obtain
𝜎1 − 𝜎3 = 𝜎𝑟1 − 𝜎𝑧1 = 𝜎𝑓1 (6.80a)
∴ 𝜎𝑧1 = 𝜎𝑟1 − 𝜎𝑓1 (6.80b)
Now, let us compute the average stresses for Zone 1. Using Eqn. (6.79), the mean radial
stress can be easily computed:
𝜎𝑟1𝑚 =
4
𝜋𝑑𝑖
2
⏟
1/Area
∫ 𝜎𝑟1(𝑟) 2𝜋𝑟 𝑑𝑟
𝑑𝑖/2
0
(6.81a)
𝜎𝑟1𝑚 =
2μ1𝜎𝑓1
𝑏
∫ (𝑟 −
𝑑𝑖
2
) 2𝜋𝑟𝑑𝑟
𝑑𝑖/2
0
−𝜎𝑓2 (1 + 𝜇
𝑏
𝑠
)
⏟
𝜎𝑟2𝑚
(6.81b)
Consequently, Eqn. (6.81b) becomes
𝜎𝑟1𝑚 = −
1
3
μ1𝜎𝑓1
𝑑𝑖
𝑏
− 𝜎𝑓2 (1 + 𝜇
𝑏
𝑠
) (6.82)
19. 6.19
Similarly, plugging Eqn. (6.82) into (6.80b) yields the average axial stress (i.e. the average
pressure on the ram):
𝜎𝑧1𝑚 = 𝜎𝑟1𝑚 − 𝜎𝑓1 (6.83a)
∴ 𝜎𝑧1𝑚 ≜ −𝑝𝑝𝑢𝑛𝑐ℎ = −𝜎𝑓1 (1 +
1
3
μ1
𝑑𝑖
𝑏
) − 𝜎𝑓2 (1 + 𝜇
𝑏
𝑠
) (6.83b)
Finally, the extrusion force becomes
𝐹𝑝𝑢𝑛𝑐ℎ = 𝑝𝑝𝑢𝑛𝑐ℎ𝐴𝑝𝑢𝑛𝑐ℎ = − 𝜎𝑧1𝑚 (
𝜋𝑑𝑖
2
4
) (6.84)
Note that the flow stresses in Eqn. (6.83b) are defined as
𝜎𝑓1 = 𝐾(𝜀𝑒𝑞1)
𝑛
(6.85a)
𝜎𝑓2 = 𝐾(𝜀𝑒𝑞,𝑡𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙)
𝑛
(6.85b)
where the equivalent strains can be expressed as follows:
𝜀𝑒𝑞1 = 𝑙𝑛 (
ℎ𝑜
𝑏
) (6.86a)
𝜀𝑒𝑞,𝑡𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 = 𝜀𝑒𝑞1 + 𝜀𝑒𝑞1
𝑑𝑖
8𝑠
⏟
𝜀𝑒𝑞2
= 𝑙𝑛 (
ℎ𝑜
𝑏
) (1 +
𝑑𝑖
8𝑠
)
(6.86b)
Here, h0 refers to the initial thickness of the billet.
Slides 6.26
Question: Would you elaborate the empirical piercing model in this slide?
Answer: This slide was actually adapted from Ref. [6]. There is a very nice explanation
about piercing process in Section 4.4.3 (Open-die Forging). Please refer to pages 236-
237.
20. 6.20
Slide 6.27
Question: Would you give an example on the application of the presented model on
backward can extrusion process?
Answer: Consider the problem (Example 3) in this slide. The given data are as follows:
K = 700 [MPa]
n = 0.24
1 = 0.06
h0 = 35 [mm]
d0 = de = 70 [mm]
di = 58 [mm]
b = 5 [mm]
s = (de –di)/2 = 6 [mm]
First of all, we shall take a look at the analytical model given by Eqn. (6.83b). The
unknown quantities are calculated as follows:
𝜀𝑒𝑞1 = 𝑙𝑛 (
ℎ0
𝑏
) = 𝑙𝑛 (
35
5
) = 1.95
𝜀𝑒𝑞,𝑡𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 = 𝑙𝑛 (
ℎ𝑜
𝑏
) (1 +
𝑑𝑖
8𝑠
) = 1.95 (1 +
58
8 ⋅ 6
) = 4.31
With the strains at hand, we can calculate the corresponding flow stresses:
𝜎𝑓1 = 𝐾(𝜀𝑒𝑞1)
𝑛
= 700(1.95)0.24
≅ 821 [MPa]
𝜎𝑓2 = 𝐾(𝜀𝑒𝑞,𝑡𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙)
𝑛
= 700(4.31)0.24
≅ 994 [MPa]
Similarly, the effective coefficient of friction becomes
𝜇 =
1
2
(μ1 +
1
2
) =
0.06 + 0.5
2
= 0.28
The mean axial stress on the punch [Eqn. (6.83b)] can be expressed as
𝜎𝑧1𝑚 = −821 (1 +
1
3
0.06
58
5
) − 994 (1 + 0.28
5
6
)
∴ ppunch = −σz1m ≅ 2237 [MPa]
The punch force is
𝐹punch = 𝑝punch𝐴punch = 2237 (
𝜋 582
4
) = 5.910 [MN]
Let us check the validity of the result:
𝜀𝐴 =
𝑑𝑖
2
𝑑𝑒
2 =
582
702
= 0.68
Since 0.5 ≤ 𝜀𝐴 ≤ 0.6, the result we have just obtained (0.68) is a little bit out of the range.
To cross-check our result, we can employ empirical techniques in Slide 6.20. Let us
compute all the required quantities:
𝐴0 =
𝜋 702
4
= 3848 [mm2
]
21. 6.21
𝐴1 =
𝜋(702
− 582
)
4
= 1206 [mm2
]
Extrusion ratio:
𝑅𝑒 =
𝐴0
𝐴1
= 3.19
Equivalent strain:
𝜀𝑒𝑞 = ln(𝑅𝑒) = 1.16
Mean flow stress:
𝜎𝑓𝑚 =
𝐾(𝜀𝑒𝑞)
𝑛
𝑛 + 1
=
700(1.16)0.24
1.24
= 585 [MPa]
Strain factor:
Qe = 0.8 + 1.2𝜀𝑒𝑞 = 0.8 + 1.2 ⋅ 1.16 = 2.19
Consequently, the average punch force is estimated as
𝐹
̅ = 𝜎𝑓𝑚 Qe A0 = 585 ⋅ 2.19 ⋅ 3848 = 4.934 [MN]
This punch force, which does not constitute any container friction, is actually in good
agreement with the one we have found earlier.
As the final step, let us also compute the constrained piercing force (see Slide 6.26):
𝐹piercing = (3 … 5)𝜎𝑓𝑚 (A0 − 𝐴1)
⏟
𝐴punch
= 5 ⋅ 585(3848 − 1206) = 7.727 [MN]
Note that in constrained piercing, the pressure factor starts with 3 (see equation above).
As the piercing tool (i.e. indenter) descends, this coefficient quickly reaches up to 5 due to
strain-hardening. Therefore, we have chosen to use the highest factor of 5 in our
computation.
Anyway, since 𝐹
̅ < 𝐹𝑝𝑖𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑖𝑛𝑔, inhomogeneous deformation (i.e. piercing) never takes
place.
22. 6.22
Slide 6.28-6.34
Question: Would you explain Table 1 in Slide 6.28?
Answer: This table, which was adapted from Lange [1] (see Tab. 5.2 on page 250),
tabulates the force components in extrusion/drawing processes. Most results given in this
table are obtained through the Siebel’s extrusion model that we have elaborated in the
previous pages. We shall show the transposed version of this table to enhance the
readability of this document.
Table 6.1: Calculation of force components for extrusion and drawing processes.
Process:
Direct/forward
extrusion of rods
Direct/forward
extrusion of tubes
Wire/rod- & bar
drawing
Ironing & tube
drawing over
fixed mandrel
Fideal 𝜎𝑓𝑚𝜀𝑒𝑞A0 𝜎𝑓𝑚𝜀𝑒𝑞A0 𝜎𝑓𝑚𝜀𝑒𝑞A1 𝜎𝑓𝑚𝜀𝑒𝑞A1
Fshear
2
3
tan(𝛼) 𝜎𝑓𝑚A0
1
2
tan(𝛼) 𝜎𝑓𝑚A0
2
3
tan(𝛼) 𝜎𝑓𝑚A1
1
2
tan(𝛼) 𝜎𝑓𝑚A1
Ffriction
(Container)
𝜋𝑑0ℎ𝜇𝜎𝑓0 𝜋𝑑0ℎ𝜇𝜎𝑓0
Ffriction
(Die-shoulder)
2𝜇𝜎𝑓𝑚𝜀𝑒𝑞A0
sin(2𝛼)
2𝜇𝜎𝑓𝑚𝜀𝑒𝑞A0
sin(2𝛼)
2𝜇𝜎𝑓𝑚𝜀𝑒𝑞A1
sin(2𝛼)
2𝜇𝑆𝜎𝑓𝑚𝜀𝑒𝑞A1
sin(2𝛼)
Ffriction
(Mandrel-die)
𝜇𝜎𝑓𝑚𝜀𝑒𝑞A1
tan(𝛼)
±
𝜇𝑀𝜎𝑓𝑚𝜀𝑒𝑞A1
tan(𝛼)
Ffriction
(Mandrel-exit)
𝜋𝑑2ℎ𝑟𝜇𝑝̅𝑟
Let us explain each process presented on a column of this table and discuss the exceptions
that go with them:
Column 1
This column refers to the direct/forward extrusion model in Eqn. (6.46). There are a few
exceptions to consider:
i) If reducing type extrusion (sometimes referred to as open-die extrusion) is
performed as shown in Slide 6.29, the friction force for the container must be
omitted [i.e. Ffriction (Container) = 0] owing to the fact that there is no container here!
The following slide (Slide 6.30) is not actually related to the comments for this table.
It reminds us that in backward extrusion process (as illustrated in this slide),
there is no container friction due to the fact that the material inside the container
is not moving at all. That is, there is no relative motion between the workpiece and
the die. Since the friction develops as a resistance to motion, the workpiece material
(under huge pressures) does not experience any frictional force whatsoever.
ii) The rod extrusion in practice is generally performed with a die angle (2) of 180. In
that case, Eqn. (6.46) obviously breaks down and yields infinite extrusion force! In
this situation, a dead-zone at an angle () of 45 (i.e. the direction where maximum
shear stress occurs) develops, the material is then plastically shorn along those
boundaries as illustrated in Slide 6.31. Hence, the shear stress becomes
23. 6.23
𝜏 = 𝜏𝑦𝑖𝑒𝑙𝑑 =
1
2
𝜎𝑓𝑚 = 𝜇′
𝜎𝑓𝑚 (6.88)
Consequently, the model is modified for this special case by defining an artificial die
angle () of 45 and the effective friction coefficient (𝜇′
) of
1
2
. Eqn. (6.46) then takes
the following form:
Ftotal′(h) = A0𝜎𝑓𝑚 [
2
3
tan(𝛼′) + (1 +
2𝜇′
sin(2𝛼′)
) 𝜀𝑒𝑞] + 𝜋𝑑0ℎ𝜇𝜎𝑓0 (6.89)
With 𝛼′
= 45° and 𝜇′
=
1
2
, it boils down to
Ftotal′(h) = A0𝜎𝑓𝑚 (
2
3
+ 2 𝜀𝑒𝑞) + 𝜋𝑑0ℎ𝜇𝜎𝑓0 (6.90)
Notice that since a dead-zone is formed inside the container, the height of the
material in the container must be modified accordingly. That is, the range of h in
Eqn. (6.90) becomes 0 ≤ ℎ ≤ ℎ0
′
where ℎ0
′
≜ ℎ0 −
𝑑0−𝑑1
2 tan(𝛼′)
.
It is critical to note that apart from 2𝛼 = 180°, the dead-zone might also emerge
when 0° < 2𝛼 < 180°. If the extrusion force computed by Eqn. (6.46) is less than that
of Eqn. (6.90), the material will favor to slide on the surface of the die-shoulder.
Otherwise, it is expected to be plastically shorn at an angle of 45. Under the
presumption that the friction forces at the container are somewhat negligible, this
artificial angle can be simply calculated as
𝛼′
= {
𝛼, 𝑓(𝛼) < 0
𝜋/4, 𝑓(𝛼) ≥ 0
(6.91)
where the function describing the sliding condition in Eqn. (6.91) is
𝑓(𝛼) = tan(𝛼) − 1 −
3
2
(1 −
2𝜇
sin(2𝛼)
) 𝜀𝑒𝑞 (6.92)
The pictorial description of Eqn. (6.91) is given in Fig. 6.11. Here, the constants 𝛼−
and 𝛼+
are essentially the roots of the nonlinear function 𝑓(𝛼) = 0. The MATLAB
function (dzone.m) listed in Table 6.2 numerically solves the above-mentioned
equation and returns these roots. It is important to note that the shallow dies (except
for the dies with 2𝛼 = 180°) are very rare in practice.
The question that might be raised at this point is whether there exists an optimum
die angle that will minimize the extrusion force. To this end, let us take the
derivative of Eqn. (6.46) with respect to and set it to zero. Since the container
friction is not a function of , the resulting expression becomes
𝑑
𝑑𝛼
[
2
3
tan(𝛼) +
2𝜇𝜀𝑒𝑞
sin(2𝛼)
] = 0 (6.93a)
24. 6.24
∴
cos(2𝛼)
sin2(𝛼)
=
2
3𝜇𝜀𝑒𝑞
(6.93b)
Solving Eqn. (6.93b) for the optimum die angle * leads to
𝛼∗
= tan−1
(√
3𝜇𝜀𝑒𝑞
3𝜇𝜀𝑒𝑞 + 2
) (6.94)
When a simulation7 with the parameters given in Tables 2 and 3 of Slide 6.28 is
performed, one can discover that the optimum angle ranges in between 11 and 37
while the average value is 28. Note that in all of these cases, 𝛼−
< 𝛼∗
< 𝛼+
. Thus,
the dead-zone formation is effectively avoided.
π/2
π/4
π/4
α+
α-
α-
α+
α
α´
f(α)<0 f(α)>0
Figure 6.11: Artificial die angle.
Column 2
This column refers to the direct/forward extrusion of tubes with a moving mandrel (its
diameter is dm = d2) as shown in Slide 6.33. The process is quite similar to the forward
extrusion of rods except that the friction forces acting on the mandrel should be taken into
consideration:
Inside the container, the relative speed of the material with respect to the mandrel
is zero. Therefore, there is no friction at this portion of the mandrel.
7 This simulation is frequently referred to as Monte-Carlo simulation. Here, the variables (, eq) are
assigned randomly within their prescribed range. The output (*) is then computed and stored for a large
number of trials (like 106). Consequently, the statistical attributes of the outcome (e.g. maximum & minimum
values, average, variance, probability distribution, etc.) are reported at the end of a typical simulation.
25. 6.25
In the die shoulder, the friction force on the mandrel is as specified in Table 6.1
(see the 5th row). Interested students are encouraged to refer to Lange [1] that
includes a derivation of this result.
Slide 6.33 elaborates the computation of the friction force acting on the mandrel at
the die exit (see the 6th row). The frictional shear stress (i.e. 𝜇𝑝̅𝑟) is presumed to be
in the range of 10 to 12 [MPa].
The rest of the components are as expected. However, the shear force decreases (e.g. the
corresponding multiplier changes from 2/3 to ½) owing to the fact that mandrel occupies
some portion of the die center. Thus, the effective area of the shorn material (at the inlet
and exit) is essentially reduced.
Table 6.2: MATLAB program to compute the artificial die angle.
mu = .125*rand;
epsilon = .5 + 6.5*rand;
as = atan(sqrt(3*mu*epsilon/(3*mu*epsilon+2)));
disp(['Optimum Die Angle: ' num2str(rad2deg(as)) ' [deg]'])
[a2,a1] = dzone(mu,epsilon);
disp(['Upper Limit of Die Angle: ' num2str(rad2deg(a2)) ' [deg]'])
disp(['Lower Limit of Die Angle: ' num2str(rad2deg(a1)) ' [deg]'])
alpha = linspace(0,pi/2,100)';
cond = tan(alpha)-1-1.5*(1-2*mu./sin(2*alpha))*epsilon;
alpha_p = alpha.*(cond<0) + .25*pi*(cond>=0);
plot(rad2deg(alpha),rad2deg(alpha_p)); grid on
xlabel('alpha [circ]'); ylabel('alphaprime [circ]')
function [alpha2,alpha1] = dzone(mu,epsilon)
fcn = @(x) tan(x)-1-1.5*(1-2*mu/sin(2*x))*epsilon;
alpha1 = fsolve(fcn,.1,optimoptions('fsolve','Display','off'));
alpha2 = fsolve(fcn,pi/4,optimoptions('fsolve','Display','off'));
end
Column 3
The expressions in this column give the force components for rod/bar drawing. An
application of this model was presented earlier through an example in Slide 6.22.
Column 4
The model presented in this column essentially neglects the changes in the inner diameter
of the drawn tube. As shown in Slide 6.32, when the inner diameter of the tube commences
to change, a bending moment (i.e. the energy required to bend the tube) must be taken
into consideration. The given model obviously lacks that component.
26. 6.26
The last comment is about ironing process. As shown in Slide 6.34, the frictional force
acting directly on the punch reduces the force transmitted to the base. In ironing, the base
force (i.e. Fp – Ff) is, by definition, the component drawing the material out. Therefore,
this friction force needs to be subtracted from the total punch force. The minus (–) sign in
the fifth row does serve for this purpose. On the other hand, in tube drawing with fixed
mandrel, the mandrel friction force adds on to the draw force. Hence, (+) sign is employed
for this case. Here, the friction coefficient 𝜇𝑀 denotes the friction coefficient between the
workpiece and the mandrel/punch while 𝜇𝑆 refers to the one between the die and the
workpiece.
References
[1] Lange, K., Lehrbuch der Umformtechnik, Band 1, 2, 3, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1975.
[2] Lange, K., Handbook of Metal Forming, SME Publications, Michigan, 1994.
[3] Siebel, E., Die Formgebung im bildsamen Zustand, Düsseldorf:Verlag Stahleisen, 1932.
[4] Siebel, E., “Untersuchungen über bildsame Formänderung unter besonderer
Berücksichtigung des Schmiedens,” Maschinenbau/Betrieb 9, 307-312, 1923.
[5] Tlusty, G., Manufacturing Processes and Equipment, Prentice Hall, NJ, 2000.
[6] Schey, J. A., Introduction to Manufacturing Processes, 2nd Edition, McGraw Hill, NY, 1987.
[7] Groover, M. P., Fundamentals of Modern Manufacturing, 5th Edition, John Wiley, NY,
2013.
[8] Dipper, M., Das Fließpressen von Hülsen in Rechnung und Versuch, Dr.-Ing.-Diss.,
Hochschule für Technik Stuttgart, 1949, s. auch Archiv f. d. Eisenhüttenwesen 20, 275-286,
1949.