Key Question: Ideas of Progress

• Enlightenment thinkers were eager to separate themselves
  from what had gone before and to emphasize a firm
  commitment to the improvement of the human condition,
  without reference to religious injunctions.

• They believed that enhancement of human life was possible
  through the application of scientific principles.

• Did their work succeed? Were they misguided in their
  approach to ‘progress’?
Critiquing the Traditional Way of Life
• The general impoverishment of the peasant majority of
  Europe had never been of particular concern to the political
  elite.
• It was generally believed impossible—or at least ill-advised—
  to improve the physical well-being of those who were lower in
  the social order.
• By contrast, a small minority shared the opposite attitude, i.e.
  that progress was both possible and desirable, through the
  application of human reason to a variety of fields.
• By utilizing an established core of knowledge, they could,
  they believed, exceed the accomplishments of all previous
  ages.
The Philosophes
• The philosophes believed that, by thinking for themselves,
  questioning and reflecting, they could understand the world
  according to their own rational lights.
• Extending the belief in natural laws that lay at the core of the
  Scientific Revolution to the realm of human affairs, they also
  claimed that progress was itself a general natural law.
• Seeing themselves as citizens of the world, rather than of their
  particular nations, they used exotic traveler’s tales to illustrate
  what outsiders might think of (rather absurd) Western
  practices and notions.
• Anti-clerical in tone and sympathetic to non-Christian
  traditions, these books also demonstrate an awareness of the
  larger world.
The Project of Systematizing Knowledge…
              and its Enemy?
• Efforts to classify, systematize, demonstrate, and
  disseminate new knowledge became a central goal of
  the Enlightenment.
• The Encyclopedia (with its first volume appearing in
  1751) was, according to its editors, designed to
  ‘contribute to the certitude and progress of human
  reason.’
• Aristocratic ‘salons’, or discussion circles, held in
  private homes and provincial literary academies, were
  also key to the dissemination of knowledge.
• However, the philosophes believed that religious
  authorities wished to suppress and impede human
  discovery.
The Philosophes vs.
               Organized Religion
• One of the most bitterly contested issues during the 18th
  century was the status of revealed religion and the
  power of the church to regulate people’s lives.
• The philosophes equated such power and control with
  bigotry and decried intolerance as the root cause of
  human divisions.
• ‘Deists’, or ‘Theists’ (as Voltaire defined them),
  believed in a God, but one who does not intervene in
  the daily affairs of individual believers.
• Spinoza seemed to approach a pantheistic
  identification of God with all of nature, and the Baron
  d’Holbach concluded that the entire idea of God was a
  mere superstition.
Applications of Enlightenment Philosophy
              to Civil Society
• In Adam Smith’s estimation, society is best served
  when individuals are permitted to hold onto their private
  gains with a minimum of state interference.
• Removing the heavy hand of government from
  economic affairs, he was also convinced, would
  improve workers’ ability to negotiate.
• Cesare Beccaria called for the reform of irrational legal
  systems and focused on the need to rehabilitate
  criminals.
• Law codes, in his estimation, should result in ‘the
  greatest happiness of the greatest number’, and not
  just the private vengeance of one ruler.
Key Question Revisited
• With their suspicion of emotion and intuition, desire for
  efficient and orderly government, willingness to subject
  every traditional belief to rational examination, and
  insistence on disseminating information outside centers
  of learning, Enlightened thinkers hoped to contribute to
  human progress.
• By applying reason to the many facets of daily life,
  people could make significant progress in the real
  world.
• How did they translate belief into action?
• Were all of their attempts successful or even desirable?

Chapter 16 - Age of Enlightenment

  • 2.
    Key Question: Ideasof Progress • Enlightenment thinkers were eager to separate themselves from what had gone before and to emphasize a firm commitment to the improvement of the human condition, without reference to religious injunctions. • They believed that enhancement of human life was possible through the application of scientific principles. • Did their work succeed? Were they misguided in their approach to ‘progress’?
  • 3.
    Critiquing the TraditionalWay of Life • The general impoverishment of the peasant majority of Europe had never been of particular concern to the political elite. • It was generally believed impossible—or at least ill-advised— to improve the physical well-being of those who were lower in the social order. • By contrast, a small minority shared the opposite attitude, i.e. that progress was both possible and desirable, through the application of human reason to a variety of fields. • By utilizing an established core of knowledge, they could, they believed, exceed the accomplishments of all previous ages.
  • 5.
    The Philosophes • Thephilosophes believed that, by thinking for themselves, questioning and reflecting, they could understand the world according to their own rational lights. • Extending the belief in natural laws that lay at the core of the Scientific Revolution to the realm of human affairs, they also claimed that progress was itself a general natural law. • Seeing themselves as citizens of the world, rather than of their particular nations, they used exotic traveler’s tales to illustrate what outsiders might think of (rather absurd) Western practices and notions. • Anti-clerical in tone and sympathetic to non-Christian traditions, these books also demonstrate an awareness of the larger world.
  • 6.
    The Project ofSystematizing Knowledge… and its Enemy? • Efforts to classify, systematize, demonstrate, and disseminate new knowledge became a central goal of the Enlightenment. • The Encyclopedia (with its first volume appearing in 1751) was, according to its editors, designed to ‘contribute to the certitude and progress of human reason.’ • Aristocratic ‘salons’, or discussion circles, held in private homes and provincial literary academies, were also key to the dissemination of knowledge. • However, the philosophes believed that religious authorities wished to suppress and impede human discovery.
  • 7.
    The Philosophes vs. Organized Religion • One of the most bitterly contested issues during the 18th century was the status of revealed religion and the power of the church to regulate people’s lives. • The philosophes equated such power and control with bigotry and decried intolerance as the root cause of human divisions. • ‘Deists’, or ‘Theists’ (as Voltaire defined them), believed in a God, but one who does not intervene in the daily affairs of individual believers. • Spinoza seemed to approach a pantheistic identification of God with all of nature, and the Baron d’Holbach concluded that the entire idea of God was a mere superstition.
  • 8.
    Applications of EnlightenmentPhilosophy to Civil Society • In Adam Smith’s estimation, society is best served when individuals are permitted to hold onto their private gains with a minimum of state interference. • Removing the heavy hand of government from economic affairs, he was also convinced, would improve workers’ ability to negotiate. • Cesare Beccaria called for the reform of irrational legal systems and focused on the need to rehabilitate criminals. • Law codes, in his estimation, should result in ‘the greatest happiness of the greatest number’, and not just the private vengeance of one ruler.
  • 9.
    Key Question Revisited •With their suspicion of emotion and intuition, desire for efficient and orderly government, willingness to subject every traditional belief to rational examination, and insistence on disseminating information outside centers of learning, Enlightened thinkers hoped to contribute to human progress. • By applying reason to the many facets of daily life, people could make significant progress in the real world. • How did they translate belief into action? • Were all of their attempts successful or even desirable?