The Third Punic War involved a lengthy siege of Carthage by Roman forces led by Scipio Aemilianus that ended in the city's total destruction in 146 BC. Despite initial resistance by the Carthaginians, who lacked a military, the Romans were eventually able to breach the city walls. Fierce house-to-house fighting ensued before the remaining 50,000 inhabitants surrendered, only to be sold into slavery. In accordance with Roman demands, Carthage was razed to the ground and its lands distributed among Roman settlers, marking the end of the once powerful Carthaginian civilization.
little book of BIG KNOWLEDGE rise &fall ROMAN EMPIREJANE HUDSON
The full rise and fall of the roman empire with maps I made this book to see what my work looks like so comments would be great as iv not finished I have worksheets to add and other exciting games.
A preview of The Romans Book... a PDF eBook that shares child-friendly information about this exciting period in history.
Perfect for using in the classroom, this eBook and accompanying teaching resources are available from www.teachingpacks.co.uk
little book of BIG KNOWLEDGE rise &fall ROMAN EMPIREJANE HUDSON
The full rise and fall of the roman empire with maps I made this book to see what my work looks like so comments would be great as iv not finished I have worksheets to add and other exciting games.
A preview of The Romans Book... a PDF eBook that shares child-friendly information about this exciting period in history.
Perfect for using in the classroom, this eBook and accompanying teaching resources are available from www.teachingpacks.co.uk
Carthage was a Phoenician state that included, during the 7th–3rd centuries BC, its wider sphere of influence known as the Carthaginian Empire. The empire extended over much of the coast of Northwest Africa as well as encompassing substantial parts of coastal Iberia and the islands of the western Mediterranean Sea.
The Kingdom of Carthage was the major power in the western Mediterranean from its establishment by the semi-legendary Queen Dido in 814 B.C. until its fall following its struggles against the rising Roman Republic. Carthage was one of the great trading powers of the Mediterranean and had relatively few rivals until its fall from grace, namely the Etruscans and the Greek city-states of Sicily and Cyrenaica. Much of Carthage's foreign policy depended on maintaining its mercantile dominance and expanding its control over island territories with which it could base its powerful navies and trade fleet.
Carthage was a Phoenician state that included, during the 7th–3rd centuries BC, its wider sphere of influence known as the Carthaginian Empire. The empire extended over much of the coast of Northwest Africa as well as encompassing substantial parts of coastal Iberia and the islands of the western Mediterranean Sea.
The Kingdom of Carthage was the major power in the western Mediterranean from its establishment by the semi-legendary Queen Dido in 814 B.C. until its fall following its struggles against the rising Roman Republic. Carthage was one of the great trading powers of the Mediterranean and had relatively few rivals until its fall from grace, namely the Etruscans and the Greek city-states of Sicily and Cyrenaica. Much of Carthage's foreign policy depended on maintaining its mercantile dominance and expanding its control over island territories with which it could base its powerful navies and trade fleet.
Read| The latest issue of The Challenger is here! We are thrilled to announce that our school paper has qualified for the NATIONAL SCHOOLS PRESS CONFERENCE (NSPC) 2024. Thank you for your unwavering support and trust. Dive into the stories that made us stand out!
Acetabularia Information For Class 9 .docxvaibhavrinwa19
Acetabularia acetabulum is a single-celled green alga that in its vegetative state is morphologically differentiated into a basal rhizoid and an axially elongated stalk, which bears whorls of branching hairs. The single diploid nucleus resides in the rhizoid.
Embracing GenAI - A Strategic ImperativePeter Windle
Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies such as Generative AI, Image Generators and Large Language Models have had a dramatic impact on teaching, learning and assessment over the past 18 months. The most immediate threat AI posed was to Academic Integrity with Higher Education Institutes (HEIs) focusing their efforts on combating the use of GenAI in assessment. Guidelines were developed for staff and students, policies put in place too. Innovative educators have forged paths in the use of Generative AI for teaching, learning and assessments leading to pockets of transformation springing up across HEIs, often with little or no top-down guidance, support or direction.
This Gasta posits a strategic approach to integrating AI into HEIs to prepare staff, students and the curriculum for an evolving world and workplace. We will highlight the advantages of working with these technologies beyond the realm of teaching, learning and assessment by considering prompt engineering skills, industry impact, curriculum changes, and the need for staff upskilling. In contrast, not engaging strategically with Generative AI poses risks, including falling behind peers, missed opportunities and failing to ensure our graduates remain employable. The rapid evolution of AI technologies necessitates a proactive and strategic approach if we are to remain relevant.
2024.06.01 Introducing a competency framework for languag learning materials ...Sandy Millin
http://sandymillin.wordpress.com/iateflwebinar2024
Published classroom materials form the basis of syllabuses, drive teacher professional development, and have a potentially huge influence on learners, teachers and education systems. All teachers also create their own materials, whether a few sentences on a blackboard, a highly-structured fully-realised online course, or anything in between. Despite this, the knowledge and skills needed to create effective language learning materials are rarely part of teacher training, and are mostly learnt by trial and error.
Knowledge and skills frameworks, generally called competency frameworks, for ELT teachers, trainers and managers have existed for a few years now. However, until I created one for my MA dissertation, there wasn’t one drawing together what we need to know and do to be able to effectively produce language learning materials.
This webinar will introduce you to my framework, highlighting the key competencies I identified from my research. It will also show how anybody involved in language teaching (any language, not just English!), teacher training, managing schools or developing language learning materials can benefit from using the framework.
Welcome to TechSoup New Member Orientation and Q&A (May 2024).pdfTechSoup
In this webinar you will learn how your organization can access TechSoup's wide variety of product discount and donation programs. From hardware to software, we'll give you a tour of the tools available to help your nonprofit with productivity, collaboration, financial management, donor tracking, security, and more.
June 3, 2024 Anti-Semitism Letter Sent to MIT President Kornbluth and MIT Cor...Levi Shapiro
Letter from the Congress of the United States regarding Anti-Semitism sent June 3rd to MIT President Sally Kornbluth, MIT Corp Chair, Mark Gorenberg
Dear Dr. Kornbluth and Mr. Gorenberg,
The US House of Representatives is deeply concerned by ongoing and pervasive acts of antisemitic
harassment and intimidation at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). Failing to act decisively to ensure a safe learning environment for all students would be a grave dereliction of your responsibilities as President of MIT and Chair of the MIT Corporation.
This Congress will not stand idly by and allow an environment hostile to Jewish students to persist. The House believes that your institution is in violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, and the inability or
unwillingness to rectify this violation through action requires accountability.
Postsecondary education is a unique opportunity for students to learn and have their ideas and beliefs challenged. However, universities receiving hundreds of millions of federal funds annually have denied
students that opportunity and have been hijacked to become venues for the promotion of terrorism, antisemitic harassment and intimidation, unlawful encampments, and in some cases, assaults and riots.
The House of Representatives will not countenance the use of federal funds to indoctrinate students into hateful, antisemitic, anti-American supporters of terrorism. Investigations into campus antisemitism by the Committee on Education and the Workforce and the Committee on Ways and Means have been expanded into a Congress-wide probe across all relevant jurisdictions to address this national crisis. The undersigned Committees will conduct oversight into the use of federal funds at MIT and its learning environment under authorities granted to each Committee.
• The Committee on Education and the Workforce has been investigating your institution since December 7, 2023. The Committee has broad jurisdiction over postsecondary education, including its compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, campus safety concerns over disruptions to the learning environment, and the awarding of federal student aid under the Higher Education Act.
• The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is investigating the sources of funding and other support flowing to groups espousing pro-Hamas propaganda and engaged in antisemitic harassment and intimidation of students. The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is the principal oversight committee of the US House of Representatives and has broad authority to investigate “any matter” at “any time” under House Rule X.
• The Committee on Ways and Means has been investigating several universities since November 15, 2023, when the Committee held a hearing entitled From Ivory Towers to Dark Corners: Investigating the Nexus Between Antisemitism, Tax-Exempt Universities, and Terror Financing. The Committee followed the hearing with letters to those institutions on January 10, 202
Model Attribute Check Company Auto PropertyCeline George
In Odoo, the multi-company feature allows you to manage multiple companies within a single Odoo database instance. Each company can have its own configurations while still sharing common resources such as products, customers, and suppliers.
Introduction to AI for Nonprofits with Tapp NetworkTechSoup
Dive into the world of AI! Experts Jon Hill and Tareq Monaur will guide you through AI's role in enhancing nonprofit websites and basic marketing strategies, making it easy to understand and apply.
Honest Reviews of Tim Han LMA Course Program.pptxtimhan337
Personal development courses are widely available today, with each one promising life-changing outcomes. Tim Han’s Life Mastery Achievers (LMA) Course has drawn a lot of interest. In addition to offering my frank assessment of Success Insider’s LMA Course, this piece examines the course’s effects via a variety of Tim Han LMA course reviews and Success Insider comments.
1. Carthage (Arabic: ق رطاجQarṭāj, Berber: ⴽⴽⴽⴽⴽⴽⴽⴽ is a suburb of Tunis, Tunisia that
Kartajen)
was the centre of the Carthaginian Empire in antiquity. The city has existed for nearly 3,000
years, developing from a Phoenician colony of the 1st millennium BC into the capital of an
ancient empire.[2] It was little more than an agricultural village for nine hundred years until the
middle of the 20th century; since then it has grown rapidly as an upscale coastal suburb.[3][4] In
2004 it had a population of 15,922 according to the national census,[5] and an estimated
population of 21,276 in January 2013.[6]
Historically Carthage has been known as: Latin: Carthago or Karthago, Ancient Greek:
Καρχηδών Karkhēdōn, Etruscan: *Carθaza, from the Phoenician
Qart[7]
ḥadašt meaning New City (Aramaic
, Qarta Ḥdatha), implying it was a 'new
[8]
Tyre'.
The first civilization that developed within the city's sphere of influence is referred to as Punic (a
form of the word "Phoenician") or Carthaginian. The city of Carthage is located on the eastern
side of Lake Tunis across from the center of Tunis. According to Greek historians, Carthage was
founded by Canaanite-speaking Phoenician colonists from Tyre (in modern Lebanon) under the
leadership of Queen Elissa or Dido. It became a large and rich city and thus a major power in the
Mediterranean. The resulting rivalry with Syracuse, Numidia, and Rome was accompanied by
several wars with respective invasions of each other's homeland.
Hannibal's invasion of Italy in the Second Punic War culminated in the Carthaginian victory at
Cannae and led to a serious threat to the continuation of Roman rule over Italy; however,
Carthage emerged from the conflict weaker after Hannibal's defeat at the Battle of Zama in
202 BC. Following the Third Punic War, the city was destroyed by the Romans in 146 BC.
However, the Romans refounded Carthage, which became the empire's fourth most important
city and the second most important city in the Latin West. It later became the capital of the shortlived Vandal kingdom. It remained one of the most important Roman cities until the Muslim
conquest when it was destroyed a second time in 698.
The Carthaginian Republic was one of the longest-lived and largest states in the ancient Mediterranean.
Reports relay several wars with Syracuse and finally, Rome, which eventually resulted in the defeat and
destruction of Carthage in the third Punic war. The Carthaginians were Semitic Phoenician settlers
originating in the Mediterranean coast of the Near East. They spoke Canaanite and followed a
predominantly Canaanite religion.
2. The fall of Carthage came at the end of the Third Punic War in 146 BC at the Battle of Carthage.[22]
Despite initial devastating Roman naval losses and Rome's recovery from the brink of defeat after the
terror of a 15-year occupation of much of Italy by Hannibal, the end of the series of wars resulted in the
end of Carthaginian power and the complete destruction of the city by Scipio Aemilianus. The Romans
pulled the Phoenician warships out into the harbour and burned them before the city, and went from
house to house, capturing and enslaving the people. Fifty thousand Carthaginians were sold into
slavery.[23] The city was set ablaze, and razed to the ground, leaving only ruins and rubble. After the fall
of Carthage, Rome annexed the majority of the Carthaginian colonies, including other North African
locations such as Volubilis, Lixus, Chellah, and Mogador.[24] The legend that the city was sown with salt is
not mentioned by the ancient sources; R.T. Ridley suggested that the story originated from 1930 in
section of the Cambridge Ancient History written by B Hallward whose influence might be an account of
Abimelech's salting of Shechem in Judges 9:45.[25][26] Warmington admitted his fault in repeating
Hallward's error but mentions an example of the story that goes back to 1299 when Boniface VIII
destroyed Palestrina.
The Punic Wars were a series of three wars fought between Rome and Carthage from 264 BC to 146
BC.[1] At the time, they were probably the largest wars that had ever taken place.[2] The term Punic
comes from the Latin word Punicus (or Poenicus), meaning "Carthaginian", with reference to the
Carthaginians' Phoenician ancestry.[3] The main cause of the Punic Wars was the conflicts of interest
between the existing Carthaginian Empire and the expanding Roman Republic. The Romans were
initially interested in expansion via Sicily (which at that time was a cultural melting pot), part of which
lay under Carthaginian control. At the start of the first Punic War, Carthage was the dominant power of
the Western Mediterranean, with an extensive maritime empire, while Rome was the rapidly ascending
power in Italy, but lacked the naval power of Carthage. By the end of the third war, after more than a
hundred years, and the loss of many hundreds of thousands of soldiers from both sides, Rome had
conquered Carthage's empire and completely destroyed the city, becoming the most powerful state of
the Western Mediterranean. With the end of the Macedonian wars – which ran concurrently with the
Punic Wars – and the defeat of the Seleucid King Antiochus III the Great in the Roman–Syrian War
(Treaty of Apamea, 188 BC) in the eastern sea, Rome emerged as the dominant Mediterranean power
and one of the most powerful cities in classical antiquity. The Roman victories over Carthage in these
wars gave Rome a preeminent status it would retain until the 5th century AD.
The Third Punic War (149–146 BC) involved an extended siege of Carthage, ending in the city's
thorough destruction. The resurgence of the struggle can be explained by growing anti-Roman
agitations in Hispania and Greece, and the visible improvement of Carthaginian wealth and
martial power in the fifty years since the Second War.
With no military, Carthage suffered raids from its neighbor Numidia. Under the terms of the
treaty with Rome, such disputes were arbitrated by the Roman Senate. Because Numidia was a
favored client state of Rome, Roman rulings were slanted heavily to favor the Numidians. After
some fifty years of this condition, Carthage had managed to discharge its war indemnity to
Rome, and considered itself no longer bound by the restrictions of the treaty, although Rome
3. believed otherwise. Carthage mustered an army to repel Numidian forces. It immediately lost the
war with Numidia, placing itself in debt yet again, this time to Numidia.
This new-found Punic militarism alarmed many Romans, including Cato the Elder who, after a
voyage to Carthage, ended all his speeches, no matter what the topic, by saying: "Ceterum
censeo Carthaginem esse delendam" – "By the way I think that Carthago must be destroyed".
In 149 BC, in an attempt to draw Carthage into open conflict, Rome made a series of escalating
demands, one being the surrender of three hundred children of the nobility as hostages, and
finally ending with the near-impossible demand that the city be demolished and rebuilt away
from the coast, deeper into Africa. When the Carthaginians refused this last demand, Rome
declared the Third Punic War. Having previously relied on mercenaries to fight their wars for
them, the Carthaginians were now forced into a more active role in the defense of their city.
They made thousands of makeshift weapons in a short amount of time, even using women's hair
for catapult strings, and were able to hold off an initial Roman attack. A second offensive under
the command of Scipio Aemilianus resulted in a three-year siege before he breached the walls,
sacked the city, and systematically burned Carthage to the ground in 146 BC.
After Rome emerged as victorious, significant Carthaginian settlements, such as those in
Mauretania, were taken over and aggrandized by the Romans. Volubilis, for example, was an
important Roman town situated near the westernmost border of Roman conquests. It was built on
the site of the previous Carthaginian settlement that overlies an earlier neolithic habitation.[8]
The Battle of Carthage was the main engagement of the Third Punic War between the Punic
city of Carthage in Africa and the Roman Republic. It was a siege operation, starting sometime
between 149 and 148 BC, and ending in spring 146 BC with the sack and complete destruction
of the city of Carthage.
After a Roman army under Manius Manilius landed in Africa in 149 BC, Carthage surrendered
and handed over hostages and arms. However, the Romans demanded the complete surrender of
the city, and surprisingly to the Romans the city refused, the faction advocating submission
overturned by one in favor of defense.
The Carthaginians manned the walls and defied the Romans, a situation which lasted for two
years. In this period, the 500,000 Carthaginians inside the wall transformed the town into a huge
arsenal. They produced about 300 swords, 500 spears, 140 shields and 1,000 projectiles for
catapults daily.[1]
The Romans elected the young but popular Scipio Aemilianus as consul, a special law being
passed to lift the age restriction. Scipio restored discipline, defeated the Carthaginians at
Nepheris, and besieged the city closely, constructing a mole to block the harbor.
In spring 146 BC, the Romans broke through the city wall but they were hard-pressed to take the
city. Every building, house and temple had been turned into a stronghold and every Carthaginian
had taken up a weapon. The Romans were forced to move slowly, capturing the city house by
house, street by street and fighting each Carthaginian soldier who fought with courage born of
4. despair. Eventually after hours upon hours of house-to-house fighting, the Carthaginians
surrendered. An estimated 50,000 surviving inhabitants were sold into slavery. The city was then
leveled. The land surrounding Carthage was eventually declared ager publicus, and it was shared
between local farmers, and Roman and Italian ones.
Before the end of the battle, a dramatic event took place: 900 survivors, most of them Roman
deserters, had found refuge in the temple of Eshmun, in the citadel of Byrsa, although it was
already burning. They negotiated their surrender, but Scipio Aemilianus expressed that
forgiveness was impossible either for Hasdrubal, the general who defended the city, or for the
defectors. Hasdrubal then left the Citadel to surrender and pray for mercy (he had tortured
Roman prisoners in front of the Roman army[2]). At that moment Hasdrubal's wife allegedly went
out with her two children, insulted her husband, sacrificed her sons and jumped with them into a
fire that the deserters had started.[3] The deserters too then hurled themselves into the flames,[3]
upon which Scipio Aemilianus began weeping. He recited a sentence from Homer's Iliad,[4] a
prophecy about the destruction of Troy, that could be applied now to Carthage's end. Scipio
declared that the fate of Carthage might one day be Rome's.[5][6] In the words of Polybius:
Scipio, when he looked upon the city as it was utterly perishing and in the last throes of its
complete destruction, is said to have shed tears and wept openly for his enemies. After being
wrapped in thought for long, and realizing that all cities, nations, and authorities must, like men,
meet their doom; that this happened to Ilium, once a prosperous city, to the empires of Assyria,
Media, and Persia, the greatest of their time, and to Macedonia itself, the brilliance of which
was so recent, either deliberately or the verses escaping him, he said:
A day will come when sacred Troy shall perish,
And Priam and his people shall be slain.
And when Polybius speaking with freedom to him, for he was his teacher, asked him what he
meant by the words, they say that without any attempt at concealment he named his own country,
for which he feared when he reflected on the fate of all things human. Polybius actually heard
him and recalls it in his history.[7]
Since the 19th century, various historians have claimed that the Romans plowed over the city and
sowed salt into the soil after destroying it, but this is not supported by ancient sources.[8]
Polybius XXXVIII, 5 The Fall of Carthage
Carthage is indisputably of key importance to Roman history. The first great imperial opponent of Rome,
they took the Romans to the very brink of defeat. The battles in the titanic struggle between the two
powers helped forge the Roman legions and navies into the supreme fighting force in the
Mediterranean. But the annihilation which befell Carthage after its final defeat by Rome makes it an
almost unknown quantity to most students of Roman history.
The Fall of Carthage
5. And so a siege began. But Carthage proved a hardy opponent. The following year, the two new
Roman consuls arrived, maintained the siege but concentrated their efforts on capturing other
Punic cities which had remained loyal to Carthage. However they failed utterly.
Alas, Rome lost patience with such incompetence and elected a new consul to deal with the
matter. They chose Scipio Aemilianus, who had so far served successfully as a military tribune
in the conflict. Scipio Aemilianus arrived just in time to save L.Hostilius Mancinus, one of the
consuls he came to replace, who found himself and some troops trapped by Carthaginian forces.
Immediately after the arrival of their new commander the Romans went on the attack and his
siege works started closing in on the city's defences. A dam was built across the mouth of the
harbour to cut off any supplies which still got in by ships. The Carthaginians, desperate to open
up their harbour again, cut a channel, from their military docks to the sea, but the Roman navy
outside enforced an effective blockade nonetheless.
Scipio's forces edged their way gradually into parts of the city. But still no breakthrough occured.
In the winter of 147/146 BC the last Punic army was defeated, which meant Rome was
effectively in control of all the countryside. Spring 146 BC saw the final Roman assault.
Starving and exhausted the defenders could hold them back no longer. Vicious street fighting
saw the legionaries edge ever closer to the citadel, to where 50'000 terrified souls had fled. They
held out for 6 days. Their lives were spared, only for them to spend the rest of their days as
slaves.
Carthage's last stand, however, was made by Romans. 900 deserters, who knew they'd be granted
no mercy at the hands of the conquering legions, locked themselves up in the Temple of Eshmun.
When they could no longer resist they chose instead to set fire to the temple and die in the
flames.
The last leader of the Carthaginians, yet another Hasdrubal, who was with them escaped the
temple and surrendered to Scipio Aemilianus. Though not before his wife and children had
thrown themselves into the flames.
Scipio then followed his orders to the letter. Carthage was to be razed to the ground, no stone
was to be left upon another, the soil was to be ploughed and strewn with salt.
Alas, when Carthage was destroyed so famously by Rome, not all of her building were razed to
the ground. As buildings were destroyed on the hills, their rubble covered some of those
buildings on the slopes. Therefore there was indeed buildings left to excavate for modern day
archaeologists. (The buildings suggest that even wealthy Carthaginians lived in relatively small
houses, with no central courtyards.)
Yet Carthage did arise again, however this time as a Roman colony. Gaius Gracchus in 123 BC
established it as the first Roman colony off Italian soil. However, it was not until further efforts
were made by Julius Ceasar that the place began to prosper. And it would take until the reign of
emperor Augustus for it become a city again.
Many Carthaginians died from starvation during the later part of the siege, while many others
died in the final six days of fighting. When the war ended, the remaining 50,000 Carthaginians, a
small part of the original pre-war population, were, as was the normal fate in antiquity of
inhabitants of sacked cities, sold into slavery by the victors.[2] Carthage was systematically
burned for 17 days; the city's walls and buildings were utterly destroyed. The remaining
6. Carthaginian territories were annexed by Rome and reconstituted to become the Roman province
of Africa.
That Roman forces then sowed the city with salt to ensure that nothing would grow there again is
almost certainly a 19th-century invention.[15] Contemporary accounts show that the land
surrounding Carthage was declared ager publicus and that it was shared between local farmers,
and Roman and Italian ones. North Africa soon became a vital source of grain for the Romans.
Roman Carthage was the main hub transporting these supplies to the capital.
Numerous significant Punic cities, such as those in Mauretania, were taken over and rebuilt by
the Romans. Examples of these rebuilt cities are Volubilis, Chellah and Mogador. Volubilis, for
example, was an important Roman town situated near the westernmost border of Roman
conquests. It was built on the site of the previous Punic settlement, but that settlement overlies an
earlier neolithic habitation.[16] Utica, the Punic city which changed loyalties at the beginning of
the siege, became the capital of the Roman province of Africa.[1]
A century later, the site of Carthage was rebuilt as a Roman city by Julius Caesar, and would
later become one of the main cities of Roman Africa by the time of the Empire.
References
1. ^ Jump up to: a b c Scullard, pages 310 and 316
2. ^ Jump up to: a b Scullard, Howard Hayes: A History of the Roman World, 753 to 146 BC.
Routledge, 2002, page 316. ISBN 0-415-30504-7
3. Jump up ^ Sidwell, Keith C.; Peter V. Jones (1997). The world of Rome: an introduction
to Roman culture. Cambridge University Press. p. 16. ISBN 0-521-38600-4.
4. Jump up ^ At Senatui quae sint gerenda praescribo et quo modo, Carthagini male iam
diu cogitanti bellum multo ante denuntio, de qua vereri non ante desinam, quam illam
excissam esse cognovero. Cicero, Marcus Tullius: De senectute. English translation and
comments by William Armistead Falconer. Loeb Classical Library, Harvard University
Press, 1923, page 26. ISBN 0-674-99170-2
5. Jump up ^ "151 BC". Third Punic War. http://thirdpunicwar.wordpress.com/. Retrieved
3 November 2013.
6. ^ Jump up to: a b French, Peter (2010). War and Moral Disson