Can we play science heuristic strategies of science research jies 2013

•Download as PPTX, PDF•

1 like•341 views

This document discusses citizen science and heuristic strategies for science research. It describes citizen science as public participation in collecting and analyzing scientific data to help address large-scale research questions. The document outlines three categories of citizen science projects and discusses how citizen science is growing in impact and methodology. It also examines John Dewey's views on experience, pragmatism, and empirical naturalism. The document proposes that citizen science experiences align with pragmatic heuristics and explores how Pierce's theories of abduction and diagrammatic reasoning relate to citizen science.

Can we play science?
Heuristic Strategies of
Science Research
João André Duarte
jduarte@museus.ul.pt

Can we play science? Heuristic Strategies of Science Research
Citizen Science
Project or Activity in which the public collects and/or analyses data to help
understand large scale research questions
Aims
Increase Scientific Knowledge
Gather meaningfull data for large-scale research questions
Increase Scientific literacy and develop problem-solving skills

Can we play science? Heuristic Strategies of Science Research
Citizen Science
Public Participation in Science Research
USA’ NSF – PPSR, 1992
Three categories:
Contributory projects
Collaborative projects
Co-created projects

Can we play science? Heuristic Strategies of Science Research
Citizen Science
Public Participation in Science Research
is growing
in numbers – “hundreds”
impact – published papers
methodology - Citizen Science Toolkit
(CAISE Inquiry Group Report, 2009)

Can we play science? Heuristic Strategies of Science Research
Web 2.0

Can we play science? Heuristic Strategies of Science Research
The detour

Can we play science? Heuristic Strategies of Science Research
Experience

Can we play science? Heuristic Strategies of Science Research
Experience
John Dewey (1859 – 1952)
Instrumentalism
Uncertain agencies
Efficient instruments

Can we play science? Heuristic Strategies of Science Research
Experience
John Dewey (1859 – 1952)
Empirical Naturalism
“(…) experience, if scientific inquiry is justified, is no
infinitesimally thin layer or foreground of nature, but
that it penetrates into it, reaching down into its
depths, and in such a way that its grasp is capable of
expansion”.
(Dewey, 1958)

Can we play science? Heuristic Strategies of Science Research
Experience
John Dewey (1859 – 1952)
Empirical Naturalism
Is a Humanist Naturalism
Experience as the place ‘where paupers and
princes meet as equals’

Can we play science? Heuristic Strategies of Science Research
Experience
John Dewey (1859 – 1952)
Pragmatism
Negation modern dualism - separation
mind/physical -
Inferences – Practical consequences

Can we play science? Heuristic Strategies of Science Research
Solving Puzzles

Can we play science? Heuristic Strategies of Science Research
Solving Puzzles
to predict the structure of proteins with
human’s puzzle-solving intuitions
http://fold.it

Can we play science? Heuristic Strategies of Science Research

Can we play science? Heuristic Strategies of Science Research
Abduction
Charles Sanders Peirce (1839 – 1914)
“Hypothesis is where we find some
very curious circumstance, which
would be explained by the supposition
that it was a case of a certain general
rule, and thereupon adopt that
supposition.”
(Charles S. Peirce CP 2.624, Deduction, Induction,
Hypothesis, 1878)

Can we play science? Heuristic Strategies of Science Research
Habit of mind
“That which determines us, from given premises, to draw one inference rather than
another, is some habit of mind, whether it be constitutional or acquired. The habit
is good or otherwise, according as it produces true conclusions from true premises
or not; and an inference is regarded as valid or not, without reference to the truth
or falsity of its conclusion specially, but according as the habit which determines it is
such as to produce true conclusions in general or not.”
(Charles S. Peirce, CP 5.367, The fixation of belief, 1877)

Can we play science? Heuristic Strategies of Science Research
Diagrammatic reasoning
“With the exception of knowledge, in the present instant, of the contents of
consciousness in that instant (the existence of which knowledge is open to doubt)
all our thought and knowledge is by signs. A sign therefore is an object which is in
relation to its object on the one hand and to an interpretant on the other, in such a
way as to bring the interpretant into a relation to the object, corresponding to its
own relation to the object. I might say 'similar to its own' for a correspondence
consists in a similarity; but perhaps correspondence is narrower.”
(Peirce, 8.332, 1904, Letter to Lady Welby))

Can we play science? Heuristic Strategies of Science Research
Conclusions
• Citizen Science experience is compatible with Pragmatist
heuristics;
• Is Citizen Science close to Dewey’s pedagogy and social project?
• Is Peirce’s ‘logic of signs’ becoming more relevant?
• Inclusion of this perspective in a wider media philosophy?

This document summarizes Larry Laudan's argument that philosophers have failed to identify features that clearly demarcate science from other domains of knowledge. It discusses past attempts by philosophers like Aristotle, logical positivists and Popper to establish criteria for demarcating science. Laudan argues that these attempts have failed due to heterogeneity within science and problems with proposed criteria. He concludes that demarcation is a "pseudo-problem" and we should instead focus on what makes beliefs well-founded. The document also briefly summarizes Massimo Pigliucci's response that abandoning demarcation would be premature given issues like anti-vaccination movements.

Karl Popper’s demarcation problem

Nicolae Sfetcu

Karl Popper, as a critical rationalist, was an opponent of all forms of skepticism, conventionalism and relativism in science. A major argument of Popper is Hume's critique of induction, arguing that induction should never be used in science. But he disagrees with the skepticism associated with Hume, nor with the support of Bacon and Newton's pure "observation" as a starting point in the formation of theories, as there are no pure observations that do not imply certain theories. Instead, Popper proposes falsifiability as a method of scientific investigation. DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.11481.36967

philosophy of science, Falsification theory, Karl popper

Khalid Zaffar

The document discusses falsification and its importance in philosophy of science. [1] Falsification proposes that for a theory to be considered scientific, it must be possible to prove it false through testing or observation. [2] Karl Popper introduced the principle of falsification, stating that a theory is scientific if we can identify potential evidence that could show it is incorrect. [3] Being able to falsify theories allows them to be rigorously tested and improved in science, distinguishing science from non-falsifiable claims.

Karl Popper's Theory of Falsification

Career Point University - Kota Rajasthan

Unit 2 Basic Concepts of Science

Ben Chetcuti

1) The language of science needs to be precise, with terms clearly defined, and may involve mathematical language. 2) Observations can be made directly through senses or indirectly through instruments, which can provide more reliable data, acting as extensions of our senses. Quantitative data is preferred. 3) A hypothesis is an educated guess used to explain a phenomenon and make predictions to enable experimentation. Experiments are designed to test hypotheses by controlling variables, and hypotheses accumulate evidence or are modified or discarded based on results.

Kuhn vs. Popper

Robert Kohl III

The researcher faces many challenges in establishing valid theories. Karl Popper and Thomas Kuhn both sought to provide frameworks to help with this struggle. Popper advocated for falsification, where a theory can only be considered valid if it can be proven false. Kuhn argued that accepted paradigms can hinder progress and proposed a model of shifting paradigms through questioning established ideas. While Popper's strict standards are difficult to apply to educational research given its complex variables, Kuhn's emphasis on constant questioning provides a better approach for the field. Both recognize the difficulty but importance of the researcher establishing valid theories through rigorous testing of ideas.

Research Methodology

Aviation Institute of Management

This document discusses different types of research studies and methodologies: - Exploratory research studies aim to gain familiarity with a phenomenon. - Descriptive research studies portray characteristics of individuals, situations, or groups. - Diagnostic research studies determine the frequency of occurrences of phenomena. - Hypothesis-testing research studies test causal relationships between variables. It also covers research methodology, a priori vs. a posteriori knowledge, ontology, epistemology, paradigms, deductive vs. inductive reasoning, and includes instructions for writing a problem statement and reading an assigned research paper.

Senior Seminar Final Essay

lnruzin

This document discusses the role of evidence in supporting beliefs across different areas of knowledge. In mathematics and natural sciences, evidence plays a very important role as beliefs must be justified and can be proven or disproven. In mathematics, statements can be proven true or false through rigorous proof and evidence. In natural sciences, the scientific method uses observation, experiments and testing to accumulate evidence to justify beliefs, though complete certainty is not possible. In contrast, religion does not require as much evidence as beliefs are based more on faith and perception than reason. While most areas benefit from evidence, religion leaves more room for faith in the absence of direct proof.

This document discusses conceptual and theoretical frameworks for research data analysis. It poses questions researchers should consider regarding practical relevance, terminology, methodology, role as interviewer, and more. Challenges include lack of vision, consideration of literature, and confusion of terms. The document also discusses ontological stances, epistemological beliefs, methodological choices in research, and the importance of defining one's framework.

Science Essays

Cheap Paper Writing Service

Science Essay Reflection Paper On Science And Science The Philosophy of Science Essay Essay on Views on the Importance of Science The Limits of Science Essays Science: Friend or Foe? Essays Science Observation Essay My Love For Science Human Science And Natural Science Scientific Theory Essay Ethics in Science Essay My Passion For Science Physical Science Reflection What Is Earth Science? Essay Science, Non Science And Pseudo Science Science And Its Impact On Science Value of Science Essay Reflective Essay On Science Essay about The Importance of a Science Education Environmental Science Essay

Defining sf

Brent Ryan Bellamy, PhD.

This document summarizes 10 different critics' definitions of science fiction from 1960 to 2015. Theodore Sturgeon defines it as a story with human problems and solutions that wouldn't happen without scientific elements. Ursula K. Le Guin describes it as extrapolating trends of the present into the future to make predictions, though the genre is more descriptive than predictive. Sherryl Vint argues science fiction is not a singular thing but is actively made from various materials, with cultural politics and aesthetics shaping definitions.

The Place Of Utopia In Todays Science

Filipa M. Ribeiro

This document summarizes a study on scientists' views of utopia in their work. It surveyed 388 scientists from different fields and continents. The study found the highest percentage of scientists with "no utopias" came from Europe, while Africa had the highest percentage with collective utopias related to knowledge. Individual utopias were more common in natural sciences. America had the most fully formed visions of science. Gender did not influence views of contemporary science. The study provided insight into how scientists currently view the relationship between science, knowledge, and communication.

The Philosophy of Science

University of Hertfordshire

Past civilisations have nurtured small populations of those trying to understand and manipulate nature to some advantage in materials, tools, weapons, food, and wealth. However, they never formed communities and lacked the means of recording, communicating, and sharing successes and failures. They also lacked a common framework/philosophy to qualify them as scientists, but that all began to change in the 16th Century. In this lecture we consider the progression to a philosophy of science, and the underlying principles and assumptions that now guide scientific inquiry.We also examines the nature of scientific knowledge, the methods of acquisition, evolution, and significance over past centuries, and reflect on the value to society. In the struggle to solve problems, deliver understanding, and reveal the truth about our universe, science had to suffer and survive: ignorance, bigotry, established superstitions, and the ‘diktats’ of religions and politics, and latterly, falling education standards mired by social media. We chart that ‘scientific’ journey emphasising the importance of observation, experimentation, and the search for universal laws. Ultimately, this essentially Aristotelian perspective was challenged and overtaken by the rise of empiricism, which emphasised the importance of sensory experience and the limitations of human knowledge. Science continues to evolve and provide us with the best truths attainable with our leading edge technologies of observation and experimentation. Today, it stands as the greatest and richest contributor to human knowledge, understanding, progress, and wellbeing. In turn, debates and controversies are ongoing, shaping the field and philosophy which remains essential for understanding the nature of scientific knowledge and the models it creates. But unlike any belief system, the answers and models furnishers by science are not certain and invariant, they tend to be stochastic and incomplete - ‘the best we can do’ at a given time.

Terry Research Methodologies

Goldsmiths design

This document provides an overview of key concepts and approaches in social science research methodologies. It discusses philosophies of science from Popper, Kuhn and Feyerabend and their views on falsification, paradigms and epistemological pluralism. It also examines debates around objectivity, the roles of values, and differences between naturalist and interpretivist approaches. Major figures discussed include Durkheim, Weber, Stanley and Wise in relation to their perspectives on the personal in research and establishing objective knowledge in the social sciences.

M &Amp; M Scientific Method

Write My Paper Cheap Chillicothe

This document discusses the scientific method and scientific theories. It explains that scientific theories are well-substantiated explanations of aspects of the natural world based on repeated observation and experimentation. Theories are created from hypotheses that have been tested through the scientific method and gather evidence. Scientific theories can explain diverse phenomena and make falsifiable predictions, making them the most reliable form of scientific knowledge. Theories and laws are both produced through the scientific method but theories are broader in scope and can unify and explain laws.

Sujay Certainty Uncertainty principle FINAL FINAL FINAL FINAL FINAL (2).pdf

Sujay Rao Mandavilli

This paper proposes a "certainty-uncertainty principle" for evaluating hypotheses in the social sciences. It discusses theories of uncertainty from physics, like Heisenberg's uncertainty principle and Gödel's incompleteness theorems, but notes its approach is different. The principle has two main postulates: 1) Researchers should consciously search for uncertainties in hypotheses, similar to searching for exceptions. 2) Certainties must be evaluated against uncertainties in hypotheses, with the net effect considered. This approach should be used along with the prior "sociological ninety-ten rule" about finding exceptions over space and time. The goal is to improve social science research quality and lead to better hypothesis formulation.

Sujay Certainty Uncertainty principle FINAL FINAL FINAL FINAL FINAL.pdf

Sujay Rao Mandavilli

This document discusses guidelines for formulating hypotheses in the social sciences that consider both certainty and uncertainty. It proposes weighing certainty and uncertainty when evaluating hypotheses to make science more objective and multi-polar. The document reviews theories of uncertainty from physics and mathematics and discusses how concepts like fuzzy logic, paradoxes, and cross-cultural research can be applied to social sciences. The goal is to make scientific research more inclusive of diverse contexts and needs of societies to better serve social progress.

phil.mind

Giuseppe Mario Saccone

This document provides an overview of the Hong Kong Programs course PHIL 250: Philosophy of Mind. It introduces the instructor, textbook, and topics that will be covered in the first lecture, including ideas, concepts, science, theory, and the nature of theories. It also includes two related readings on mapping the brain and the mystery of consciousness. The summaries focus on key concepts that will be discussed in the course rather than providing a comprehensive summary of the document.

Science and Objectivity

Tyler York

This document provides an introduction to the author's paper on objectivity in science. It begins by outlining the debate around whether objectivity exists in science. The author then defines key terms like objectivity and science. The main body discusses the problem of underdetermination, which questions objectivity by showing that multiple hypotheses can be consistent with the evidence. The author argues this problem strikes a "death blow" to the idea of objective science. They intend to later argue that using perspectives and context, an intellectual consensus can be reached that approaches objectivity, though true objectivity cannot be achieved.

The Normative Structure Of Science

Custom Papers Online Portland State University

The document discusses Thomas Kuhn's work "The Structure of Scientific Revolutions" and his key concepts of paradigms, normal science, and scientific revolutions. Kuhn argued that science progresses through periods of normal science within a dominant paradigm, punctuated by scientific revolutions that result in a new paradigm taking hold. His work challenged the traditional view of science as a linear, cumulative process.

Empiricism, Positivism and Post-Positivism In An Introduc

TanaMaeskm

Empiricism, Positivism and Post-Positivism In: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Methodology By: Kerry E. Howell Pub. Date: 2015 Access Date: June 17, 2022 Publishing Company: SAGE Publications Ltd City: London Print ISBN: 9781446202999 Online ISBN: 9781473957633 DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781473957633 Print pages: 32-54 © 2013 SAGE Publications Ltd All Rights Reserved. This PDF has been generated from SAGE Research Methods. Please note that the pagination of the online version will vary from the pagination of the print book. https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781473957633 https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781473957633 https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781473957633 Empiricism, Positivism and Post-Positivism Introduction Research involves understanding the relationship between theory, philosophy (ontology and epistemology), methodology and methods. Any research project whether this be a dissertation, thesis or research paper requires some understanding and explanation of the relationships between these areas. This text explains these relationships through a discussion of rationalist arguments in Chapter 1, theory in Chapter 2 and empiricist, positivist and phenomenological positions in this and the following chapter. It is useful to have some knowledge of these positions when undertaking research projects because the paradigms of inquiry and subsequent methodological approaches and methods of data collection extend what may be considered valid knowledge generation or accumulation actually entails. Based in empiricism, positivism provided an important and relevant addition to our conceptualisation of how knowledge may be measured, defined and accumulated. In a bid to fully explain the relationship between methodology and the philosophical and scientific underpinnings of specific paradigms of inquiry, this chapter analyses the differentiations between empiricism, positivism and post-positivism each of which, it may be argued, exemplifies a certain modernist approach to knowledge generation. However, this demarcation can become problematic when a close analysis is undertaken. For instance, as noted above, the falsification process and the distaste for grand theory apparent in post-positivism in some contexts render it postmodernist. The modernist/postmodernist debate picks up on a number of issues identified in Chapters 1 and 2 in terms of ongoing debates regarding the nature of reality, truth, knowledge and theory. That is, whether or not the world has a real existence beyond human thought? Positivists consider an external reality exists that can be understood completely whereas post-positivists argue that even though such a reality can be discerned it may only be understood probabilistically. Empiricists consider that scientific truth and reality are based on experience and observation and that ‘human consciousness which is subjective is not accessib ...

Essay About Science

Paper Writing Service Superiorpapers

Advanced reserach method.pptx

MeseretKebede10

This document provides information about an Advanced Research Methods course, including the course content and evaluation methods. The course covers topics such as introduction to research, literature review, research design, data analysis, and writing conclusions. Students will be evaluated based on a mini research project, research proposal, article review, and final exam. The course aims to teach students a systematic approach to conducting research through objective and empirical methods.

Analytical Writing Sample #2

Alexander Moyer

1. The document discusses the extent to which imagination is more important than knowledge in fields and professions. It agrees with Einstein that imagination embraces possibilities beyond current knowledge and understanding, while knowledge is limited to what is already known. 2. Creativity and dissenting viewpoints are important for progress, as seen in scientific revolutions that overturned existing paradigms, like Einstein's theory of relativity. However, knowledge and experience are also needed, as unfounded ideas without empirical evidence amount to ignorance. 3. Both imagination and knowledge play important roles. Imagination is needed to envision new possibilities and theories, while knowledge, including data from experimentation, is necessary to test ideas and advance understanding of nature.

What is the scientific method

Michael R. Büchler

The document discusses the scientific method and its application to process improvement. It begins by discussing key thinkers who helped establish the scientific method, such as Einstein, Pearson, Broad, Popper, Dewey, Simon, and Ackoff. It then covers concepts like the scientific method, theory development and testing, bounded rationality in decision making, and systems thinking. The document concludes by discussing statistical process control pioneers like Shewhart, Juran, and their contributions to using statistics and understanding process dominance to analyze and improve processes, setting up the DMAIC method as a strategic approach.

The History Of Science In Science Education: Inquiring about Inquiry

Jerrid Kruse

The Science of Religion

Maya Bohnhoff

Theory presentation

crhildreth

The document discusses the nature and role of theory in scientific research, defining key concepts like hypotheses, theories, and laws. It explains that scientific theories are well-established explanations for natural phenomena built from testable observations and hypotheses, playing important roles in scientific research such as being explanatory, predictive, and guiding further study. The document also contrasts inductive research, which develops theories from empirical data, with deductive research, which tests theory-inspired hypotheses.

WeTestAthens: Postman's AI & Automation Techniques

Postman

Driving Business Innovation: Latest Generative AI Advancements & Success Story

Safe Software

Are you ready to revolutionize how you handle data? Join us for a webinar where we’ll bring you up to speed with the latest advancements in Generative AI technology and discover how leveraging FME with tools from giants like Google Gemini, Amazon, and Microsoft OpenAI can supercharge your workflow efficiency. During the hour, we’ll take you through: Guest Speaker Segment with Hannah Barrington: Dive into the world of dynamic real estate marketing with Hannah, the Marketing Manager at Workspace Group. Hear firsthand how their team generates engaging descriptions for thousands of office units by integrating diverse data sources—from PDF floorplans to web pages—using FME transformers, like OpenAIVisionConnector and AnthropicVisionConnector. This use case will show you how GenAI can streamline content creation for marketing across the board. Ollama Use Case: Learn how Scenario Specialist Dmitri Bagh has utilized Ollama within FME to input data, create custom models, and enhance security protocols. This segment will include demos to illustrate the full capabilities of FME in AI-driven processes. Custom AI Models: Discover how to leverage FME to build personalized AI models using your data. Whether it’s populating a model with local data for added security or integrating public AI tools, find out how FME facilitates a versatile and secure approach to AI. We’ll wrap up with a live Q&A session where you can engage with our experts on your specific use cases, and learn more about optimizing your data workflows with AI. This webinar is ideal for professionals seeking to harness the power of AI within their data management systems while ensuring high levels of customization and security. Whether you're a novice or an expert, gain actionable insights and strategies to elevate your data processes. Join us to see how FME and AI can revolutionize how you work with data!

Similar to Can we play science heuristic strategies of science research jies 2013

Interpretive frameworks -spring13

paul_ilsley

Science Essays

Cheap Paper Writing Service

Defining sf

Brent Ryan Bellamy, PhD.

The Place Of Utopia In Todays Science

Filipa M. Ribeiro

The Philosophy of Science

University of Hertfordshire

Terry Research Methodologies

Goldsmiths design

M &Amp; M Scientific Method

Write My Paper Cheap Chillicothe

Sujay Certainty Uncertainty principle FINAL FINAL FINAL FINAL FINAL (2).pdf

Sujay Rao Mandavilli

Sujay Certainty Uncertainty principle FINAL FINAL FINAL FINAL FINAL.pdf

Sujay Rao Mandavilli

phil.mind

Giuseppe Mario Saccone

Science and Objectivity

Tyler York

The Normative Structure Of Science

Custom Papers Online Portland State University

Empiricism, Positivism and Post-Positivism In An Introduc

TanaMaeskm

Essay About Science

Paper Writing Service Superiorpapers

Advanced reserach method.pptx

MeseretKebede10

Analytical Writing Sample #2

Alexander Moyer

What is the scientific method

Michael R. Büchler

The History Of Science In Science Education: Inquiring about Inquiry

Jerrid Kruse

The Science of Religion

Maya Bohnhoff

Theory presentation

crhildreth

Similar to Can we play science heuristic strategies of science research jies 2013 (20)

Interpretive frameworks -spring13

Science Essays

Defining sf

The Place Of Utopia In Todays Science

The Philosophy of Science

Terry Research Methodologies

M &Amp; M Scientific Method

Sujay Certainty Uncertainty principle FINAL FINAL FINAL FINAL FINAL (2).pdf

Sujay Certainty Uncertainty principle FINAL FINAL FINAL FINAL FINAL.pdf

phil.mind

Science and Objectivity

The Normative Structure Of Science

Empiricism, Positivism and Post-Positivism In An Introduc

Essay About Science

Advanced reserach method.pptx

Analytical Writing Sample #2

What is the scientific method

The History Of Science In Science Education: Inquiring about Inquiry

The Science of Religion

Theory presentation

Recently uploaded

WeTestAthens: Postman's AI & Automation Techniques

Postman

Driving Business Innovation: Latest Generative AI Advancements & Success Story

Safe Software

20240609 QFM020 Irresponsible AI Reading List May 2024

Matthew Sinclair

Building Production Ready Search Pipelines with Spark and Milvus

Zilliz

Project Management Semester Long Project - Acuity

jpupo2018

Acuity is an innovative learning app designed to transform the way you engage with knowledge. Powered by AI technology, Acuity takes complex topics and distills them into concise, interactive summaries that are easy to read & understand. Whether you're exploring the depths of quantum mechanics or seeking insight into historical events, Acuity provides the key information you need without the burden of lengthy texts.

TrustArc Webinar - 2024 Global Privacy Survey

TrustArc

How does your privacy program stack up against your peers? What challenges are privacy teams tackling and prioritizing in 2024? In the fifth annual Global Privacy Benchmarks Survey, we asked over 1,800 global privacy professionals and business executives to share their perspectives on the current state of privacy inside and outside of their organizations. This year’s report focused on emerging areas of importance for privacy and compliance professionals, including considerations and implications of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies, building brand trust, and different approaches for achieving higher privacy competence scores. See how organizational priorities and strategic approaches to data security and privacy are evolving around the globe. This webinar will review: - The top 10 privacy insights from the fifth annual Global Privacy Benchmarks Survey - The top challenges for privacy leaders, practitioners, and organizations in 2024 - Key themes to consider in developing and maintaining your privacy program

みなさんこんにちはこれ何文字まで入るの？40文字以下不可とか本当に意味わからないけどこれ限界文字数書いてないからマジでやばい文字数いけるんじゃないの？えこ...

名前です男

Columbus Data & Analytics Wednesdays - June 2024

Jason Packer

Unlock the Future of Search with MongoDB Atlas_ Vector Search Unleashed.pdf

Malak Abu Hammad

Discover how MongoDB Atlas and vector search technology can revolutionize your application's search capabilities. This comprehensive presentation covers: * What is Vector Search? * Importance and benefits of vector search * Practical use cases across various industries * Step-by-step implementation guide * Live demos with code snippets * Enhancing LLM capabilities with vector search * Best practices and optimization strategies Perfect for developers, AI enthusiasts, and tech leaders. Learn how to leverage MongoDB Atlas to deliver highly relevant, context-aware search results, transforming your data retrieval process. Stay ahead in tech innovation and maximize the potential of your applications. #MongoDB #VectorSearch #AI #SemanticSearch #TechInnovation #DataScience #LLM #MachineLearning #SearchTechnology

Programming Foundation Models with DSPy - Meetup Slides

Zilliz

Recommendation System using RAG Architecture

fredae14

Presentation of the OECD Artificial Intelligence Review of Germany

innovationoecd

Skybuffer SAM4U tool for SAP license adoption

Tatiana Kojar

Manage and optimize your license adoption and consumption with SAM4U, an SAP free customer software asset management tool. SAM4U, an SAP complimentary software asset management tool for customers, delivers a detailed and well-structured overview of license inventory and usage with a user-friendly interface. We offer a hosted, cost-effective, and performance-optimized SAM4U setup in the Skybuffer Cloud environment. You retain ownership of the system and data, while we manage the ABAP 7.58 infrastructure, ensuring fixed Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) and exceptional services through the SAP Fiori interface.

AI 101: An Introduction to the Basics and Impact of Artificial Intelligence

IndexBug

OpenID AuthZEN Interop Read Out - Authorization

David Brossard

“Building and Scaling AI Applications with the Nx AI Manager,” a Presentation...

Edge AI and Vision Alliance

For the full video of this presentation, please visit: https://www.edge-ai-vision.com/2024/06/building-and-scaling-ai-applications-with-the-nx-ai-manager-a-presentation-from-network-optix/ Robin van Emden, Senior Director of Data Science at Network Optix, presents the “Building and Scaling AI Applications with the Nx AI Manager,” tutorial at the May 2024 Embedded Vision Summit. In this presentation, van Emden covers the basics of scaling edge AI solutions using the Nx tool kit. He emphasizes the process of developing AI models and deploying them globally. He also showcases the conversion of AI models and the creation of effective edge AI pipelines, with a focus on pre-processing, model conversion, selecting the appropriate inference engine for the target hardware and post-processing. van Emden shows how Nx can simplify the developer’s life and facilitate a rapid transition from concept to production-ready applications.He provides valuable insights into developing scalable and efficient edge AI solutions, with a strong focus on practical implementation.

Cosa hanno in comune un mattoncino Lego e la backdoor XZ?

Speck&Tech

ABSTRACT: A prima vista, un mattoncino Lego e la backdoor XZ potrebbero avere in comune il fatto di essere entrambi blocchi di costruzione, o dipendenze di progetti creativi e software. La realtà è che un mattoncino Lego e il caso della backdoor XZ hanno molto di più di tutto ciò in comune. Partecipate alla presentazione per immergervi in una storia di interoperabilità, standard e formati aperti, per poi discutere del ruolo importante che i contributori hanno in una comunità open source sostenibile. BIO: Sostenitrice del software libero e dei formati standard e aperti. È stata un membro attivo dei progetti Fedora e openSUSE e ha co-fondato l'Associazione LibreItalia dove è stata coinvolta in diversi eventi, migrazioni e formazione relativi a LibreOffice. In precedenza ha lavorato a migrazioni e corsi di formazione su LibreOffice per diverse amministrazioni pubbliche e privati. Da gennaio 2020 lavora in SUSE come Software Release Engineer per Uyuni e SUSE Manager e quando non segue la sua passione per i computer e per Geeko coltiva la sua curiosità per l'astronomia (da cui deriva il suo nickname deneb_alpha).

Let's Integrate MuleSoft RPA, COMPOSER, APM with AWS IDP along with Slack

shyamraj55

Salesforce Integration for Bonterra Impact Management (fka Social Solutions A...

Jeffrey Haguewood

Sidekick Solutions uses Bonterra Impact Management (fka Social Solutions Apricot) and automation solutions to integrate data for business workflows. We believe integration and automation are essential to user experience and the promise of efficient work through technology. Automation is the critical ingredient to realizing that full vision. We develop integration products and services for Bonterra Case Management software to support the deployment of automations for a variety of use cases. This video focuses on integration of Salesforce with Bonterra Impact Management. Interested in deploying an integration with Salesforce for Bonterra Impact Management? Contact us at sales@sidekicksolutionsllc.com to discuss next steps.

June Patch Tuesday

Ivanti

Ivanti’s Patch Tuesday breakdown goes beyond patching your applications and brings you the intelligence and guidance needed to prioritize where to focus your attention first. Catch early analysis on our Ivanti blog, then join industry expert Chris Goettl for the Patch Tuesday Webinar Event. There we’ll do a deep dive into each of the bulletins and give guidance on the risks associated with the newly-identified vulnerabilities.

Recently uploaded (20)

WeTestAthens: Postman's AI & Automation Techniques

Driving Business Innovation: Latest Generative AI Advancements & Success Story

20240609 QFM020 Irresponsible AI Reading List May 2024

Building Production Ready Search Pipelines with Spark and Milvus

Project Management Semester Long Project - Acuity

TrustArc Webinar - 2024 Global Privacy Survey

Columbus Data & Analytics Wednesdays - June 2024

Unlock the Future of Search with MongoDB Atlas_ Vector Search Unleashed.pdf

Programming Foundation Models with DSPy - Meetup Slides

Recommendation System using RAG Architecture

Presentation of the OECD Artificial Intelligence Review of Germany

Skybuffer SAM4U tool for SAP license adoption

AI 101: An Introduction to the Basics and Impact of Artificial Intelligence

OpenID AuthZEN Interop Read Out - Authorization

“Building and Scaling AI Applications with the Nx AI Manager,” a Presentation...

Cosa hanno in comune un mattoncino Lego e la backdoor XZ?

Let's Integrate MuleSoft RPA, COMPOSER, APM with AWS IDP along with Slack

Salesforce Integration for Bonterra Impact Management (fka Social Solutions A...

June Patch Tuesday

Can we play science heuristic strategies of science research jies 2013

1. Can we play science? Heuristic Strategies of Science Research João André Duarte jduarte@museus.ul.pt

2. Can we play science? Heuristic Strategies of Science Research Citizen Science Project or Activity in which the public collects and/or analyses data to help understand large scale research questions Aims Increase Scientific Knowledge Gather meaningfull data for large-scale research questions Increase Scientific literacy and develop problem-solving skills

3. Can we play science? Heuristic Strategies of Science Research Citizen Science Public Participation in Science Research USA’ NSF – PPSR, 1992 Three categories: Contributory projects Collaborative projects Co-created projects

4. Can we play science? Heuristic Strategies of Science Research Citizen Science Public Participation in Science Research is growing in numbers – “hundreds” impact – published papers methodology - Citizen Science Toolkit (CAISE Inquiry Group Report, 2009)

5. Can we play science? Heuristic Strategies of Science Research Web 2.0

6. Can we play science? Heuristic Strategies of Science Research The detour

7. Can we play science? Heuristic Strategies of Science Research Experience

8. Can we play science? Heuristic Strategies of Science Research Experience John Dewey (1859 – 1952) Instrumentalism Uncertain agencies Efficient instruments

9. Can we play science? Heuristic Strategies of Science Research Experience John Dewey (1859 – 1952) Empirical Naturalism “(…) experience, if scientific inquiry is justified, is no infinitesimally thin layer or foreground of nature, but that it penetrates into it, reaching down into its depths, and in such a way that its grasp is capable of expansion”. (Dewey, 1958)

10. Can we play science? Heuristic Strategies of Science Research Experience John Dewey (1859 – 1952) Empirical Naturalism Is a Humanist Naturalism Experience as the place ‘where paupers and princes meet as equals’

11. Can we play science? Heuristic Strategies of Science Research Experience John Dewey (1859 – 1952) Pragmatism Negation modern dualism - separation mind/physical - Inferences – Practical consequences

12. Can we play science? Heuristic Strategies of Science Research Solving Puzzles

13. Can we play science? Heuristic Strategies of Science Research Solving Puzzles to predict the structure of proteins with human’s puzzle-solving intuitions http://fold.it

14. Can we play science? Heuristic Strategies of Science Research

15. Can we play science? Heuristic Strategies of Science Research

16. Can we play science? Heuristic Strategies of Science Research

17. Can we play science? Heuristic Strategies of Science Research

18. Can we play science? Heuristic Strategies of Science Research Abduction Charles Sanders Peirce (1839 – 1914) “Hypothesis is where we find some very curious circumstance, which would be explained by the supposition that it was a case of a certain general rule, and thereupon adopt that supposition.” (Charles S. Peirce CP 2.624, Deduction, Induction, Hypothesis, 1878)

19. Can we play science? Heuristic Strategies of Science Research Habit of mind “That which determines us, from given premises, to draw one inference rather than another, is some habit of mind, whether it be constitutional or acquired. The habit is good or otherwise, according as it produces true conclusions from true premises or not; and an inference is regarded as valid or not, without reference to the truth or falsity of its conclusion specially, but according as the habit which determines it is such as to produce true conclusions in general or not.” (Charles S. Peirce, CP 5.367, The fixation of belief, 1877)

20. Can we play science? Heuristic Strategies of Science Research Diagrammatic reasoning “With the exception of knowledge, in the present instant, of the contents of consciousness in that instant (the existence of which knowledge is open to doubt) all our thought and knowledge is by signs. A sign therefore is an object which is in relation to its object on the one hand and to an interpretant on the other, in such a way as to bring the interpretant into a relation to the object, corresponding to its own relation to the object. I might say 'similar to its own' for a correspondence consists in a similarity; but perhaps correspondence is narrower.” (Peirce, 8.332, 1904, Letter to Lady Welby))

21. Can we play science? Heuristic Strategies of Science Research Conclusions • Citizen Science experience is compatible with Pragmatist heuristics; • Is Citizen Science close to Dewey’s pedagogy and social project? • Is Peirce’s ‘logic of signs’ becoming more relevant? • Inclusion of this perspective in a wider media philosophy?

Can we play science heuristic strategies of science research jies 2013

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

Similar to Can we play science heuristic strategies of science research jies 2013

Similar to Can we play science heuristic strategies of science research jies 2013 (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Can we play science heuristic strategies of science research jies 2013