SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 22
Presented By M.Z.Arifeen
M.Phil Scholar
Department of Biotech
University of Malakand.
Date of Presentation
10/02/2014
•Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) is a Gram-positive, spore forming, soil bacterium.
•When resources are limited, vegetative Bt cells undergo sporulation, synthesizing
a protein crystal, the insecticidal crystal proteins (ICPs) or Cry Proteins.
•These Cry proteins are coded by genes (cry genes) harbored in megaplasmids
• For over 50 years, Bt has been applied to crops in spray form as an
insecticide, containing a mixture of spores and the associated protein crystals
• The development and commercialization of insect-resistant transgenic Bt crops
expressing Cry toxins revolutionized the history of agriculture
•High specificity and potency,
•Reduction in chemical pesticide applications,
• Increased crop yield.
• The Cry protein is made as an inactive protoxin.
• Cry protein has to be eaten to cause mortality.
• Conversion of the protoxin (e.g., 130 kDa) into the active
toxin (e.g., 68 kDa) called delta endotoxin requires the
combination of a slightly alkaline pH (7.5-8) and the action
of a specific protease(s) found in the insect gut
• The active toxin binds to protein receptors on the insect gut
epithelial cell membrane.
• The toxin forms pores in the insect gut.
B. thuringienis parasporal crystal composed of Cry1
protoxin protein. Conversion of the 130-kDa protoxin
into an active 68-kDa toxin requires an alkaline
environment (pH 7.5 to 8) and the action of a specific
protease, both of which are found in the insect gut.
The activated toxin binds to protein receptors on the
insect gut epithelial cells.
CADR= Cadherin receptor
ALP=Alkaline phosphatase
GCR =Glyco-conjugate receptor
APN=Amino peptidase - N
Receptors for Bt Toxin
BT crystalline Toxin 200px.
Normal gut bacteria
BT SPORES
• There are three domains in this
delta endotoxin.
• Domain I and Domain II are very
conservative.
• Domain III is highly variable to
attach to different receptors.
• There are over 200 known
variants for this cry or cryt
protein
• Domain I is the prime candidate
for formation of the
transmembrane lytic pore.
• Domain II is believed to have a
major role in receptor binding
and thus in specificity
determination
• domain III of the Bt toxin
structure may play some role in
protecting the toxins against gut
proteolysis.
Bt action is very specific. Different strains of Bt are specific to different
receptors in insect gut wall. Bt toxicity depends on recognizing
receptors, damage to the gut by the toxin occurs upon binding to a
receptor. Each insect species possesses different types of receptors that
will match only certain toxin proteins, like a lock to a key.
The crystal proteins bind specifically to certain receptors in the
insect's intestine. Not all insects carry the same receptors allowing for
high species specificity. Humans and other vertabrates do not have these
receptors in their bodies, so the toxin is unable to affect us.
It is because of this that farmers have to be careful to match the target
pest species with a particular Bt toxin protein which is specific for that
insect. This also helps the beneficial insects because they will usually not
be harmed by that particular strain of Bt.
Japanese biologist, Shigetane Ishiwatari was
investigating the cause of the sotto disease (sudden-
collapse disease) that was killing large populations of
silkworms when he first isolated the bacterium Bacillus
thuringiensis (Bt) as the cause of the disease in 1901.
 Ernst Berliner isolated a bacteria that had killed a
Mediterranean flour moth in 1911, and rediscovered Bt.
He named it Bacillus thuringiensis, after the German
town Thuringia where the moth was found.
 In 1915, Berliner reported the existence of a crystal
protein within Bt.
 Farmers started to use Bt as a pesticide in 1920.
France soon started to make commercialized spore based formulations
called Sporine in 1938
 These Bt pesticide were used in the form of spray.
Bt products such as sprays are rapidly washed away by
rain, and degrade under the sun's UV rays.
there were many insects that are not susceptible to any
of the limited number of Bt strains known at the time.
All the Bt strains known at the time were toxic to
lepidopteran (moth) larvae only.
There were also some insects that live within the plant
or underground where the Bt sprays could not reach.
• Bt plants have genes for the Bt toxins engineered to produce ICP toxic to
the pest species of concern.
• As the insect feeds on the Bt plant, it ingests the ICP and suffers the same
fate as if it ingested leaf tissue sprayed with Bt.
• At the end of 2010, an estimated 26.3 million hectares of land were planted
with crops containing the Bt gene globally(James 2011).
The chief advantages to Bt plants:
• The pests hiding inside plant parts controlled effectively;
• Multiple sprays are not needed;
• Give opportunity to get rid of chemical pesticide like
DDT, Organophosphate etc
• A disadvantage of Bt plants is that insect-specific ICPs cannot be changed
during a growing season.
•As it turns out, nature has its own biotechnologist called Agrobacterium
tumefaciens which induces the growth of tumours on woody plants.
These tumours are engineered by A.tumefaciens to produce a special
food for the bacteria (opines) that plants normally cannot make.
•These tumours arise from a unique bacterial transformation mechanism
involving the Ti-plasmid which coordinates the random insertion of a
subset of its DNA (t-DNA) containing opine synthase genes into a plant
chromosome. By replacing portions of the t-DNA sequence with genes
of interest (such as Cry).
•Researchers have been able to use this transformational mechanism and
confer new traits to many flowering plants including grasses such as
corn and rice etc.
In March 1995, the first Bt crop deregulated in the U.S. were seven lines of Colorado
Potato Beetle Resistant Bt Potato by Monsanto. Since then, many more Bt crops have
been deregulated, engineered to produce a variety of different Bt proteins from various
subspecies of Bt. Bt crops include:
Corn:
European Corn Borer Resistant Corn (first deregulated in the U.S. in May 1995)
Corn Rootworm Resistant Corn (first deregulated in the U.S. in October 2002)
Cotton:
Lepidopteran Resistant Cotton (first deregulated in the U.S. in June 1995)
Potato:
Colorado Potato Beetle Resistant Bt Potato (first deregulated in the U.S. in March 1995)
Potato Tuber Moth Resistant Bt Potato (being developed in South Africa)
Soybean:
Bt Soybean (first deregulated in the U.S. in October 2011, not yet sold commercially)
Tomato:
Lepidopteran Resistant Tomato (first deregulated in the U.S. in March 1998, not yet
sold commercially)
Kurstaki strain (Biobit, Dipel, MVP, Steward, Thuricide, etc.):
Vegetable insects
Cabbage worm (cabbage looper, imported cabbageworm, diamondback
moth, etc.).
Tomato and tobacco hornworm.
Field and forage crop insects
European corn borer (granular formulations have given good control of first
generation corn borers).
Alfalfa caterpillar, alfalfa webworm.
Fruit crop insects
Leafroller.
Achemon sphinx.
.
Tree and shrub insects
Tent caterpillar.
Fall webworm.
Spiny elm caterpillar.
Western spruce budworm.
Israelensis strains (Vectobac, Mosquito Dunks, Gnatrol, Bactimos, etc.)
Mosquito.
Black fly.
Fungus gnat.
San diego/tenebrionis strains (Trident, M-One, M-Trak, Foil, Novodor, etc.)
Colorado potato beetle.
Elm leaf beetle.
Cottonwood leaf beetle
• The specific activity of Bt generally is considered highly
beneficial. Unlike most insecticides, Bt insecticides do not have
a broad spectrum of activity, so they do not kill beneficial
insects. This includes the natural enemies of insects (predators
and parasites), as well as beneficial pollinators, such as
honeybees
• Perhaps the major advantage is that Bt is essentially nontoxic to
people, pets and wildlife. This high margin of safety
recommends its use on food Crops or in other sensitive sites
where pesticide use can cause adverse effects.
• Used as alternative to DDT and organophosphates since
1920s
• Together with the reduction of pesticide application and cost
reduction, Bt crops have brought tremendous benefit to both the
environment and farmers .
• Expanded use of transgenic crops for insect control will likely include
more varieties with combinations of two or more Bt toxins, novel Bt
toxins
• Modified Bt toxins that have been genetically engineered to kill insects
resistant to standard Bt toxins.
BT crops

More Related Content

What's hot

What's hot (20)

Methods of gene transfer in plant
Methods of gene transfer in plantMethods of gene transfer in plant
Methods of gene transfer in plant
 
Transgenic plants and their Application
Transgenic plants and their ApplicationTransgenic plants and their Application
Transgenic plants and their Application
 
Gene transformation methods
Gene transformation methodsGene transformation methods
Gene transformation methods
 
Bt. crops ppt
Bt. crops pptBt. crops ppt
Bt. crops ppt
 
Transgenic plants ppt
Transgenic plants  pptTransgenic plants  ppt
Transgenic plants ppt
 
Biolistics
BiolisticsBiolistics
Biolistics
 
Chloroplast transformation
Chloroplast transformationChloroplast transformation
Chloroplast transformation
 
Screening and selection of recombinants
Screening and selection of recombinants Screening and selection of recombinants
Screening and selection of recombinants
 
Transgenic plants
Transgenic plantsTransgenic plants
Transgenic plants
 
Creation of Bt plants
Creation of Bt plantsCreation of Bt plants
Creation of Bt plants
 
Herbicide resistance
Herbicide resistanceHerbicide resistance
Herbicide resistance
 
Ti plasmid as a vector,
Ti plasmid as a vector, Ti plasmid as a vector,
Ti plasmid as a vector,
 
Biotechnological approach to develop insect resistant crops
Biotechnological approach to develop insect resistant cropsBiotechnological approach to develop insect resistant crops
Biotechnological approach to develop insect resistant crops
 
Agrobacterium tumefaciens
Agrobacterium tumefaciensAgrobacterium tumefaciens
Agrobacterium tumefaciens
 
Bt Cotton Development Stages
Bt Cotton Development StagesBt Cotton Development Stages
Bt Cotton Development Stages
 
somatic hybridization
somatic hybridizationsomatic hybridization
somatic hybridization
 
Agrobacterium tumefaciens
Agrobacterium tumefaciensAgrobacterium tumefaciens
Agrobacterium tumefaciens
 
Agrobacterium mediated gene transfer
Agrobacterium mediated gene transferAgrobacterium mediated gene transfer
Agrobacterium mediated gene transfer
 
Production of secondary metabolite
Production of secondary metaboliteProduction of secondary metabolite
Production of secondary metabolite
 
Transgenic plants with biotic stress resistance
Transgenic plants with biotic stress resistanceTransgenic plants with biotic stress resistance
Transgenic plants with biotic stress resistance
 

Viewers also liked

Bacterial gene for crop improvement
Bacterial gene for crop improvementBacterial gene for crop improvement
Bacterial gene for crop improvement
Anurag Mishra
 
Bt rice presentation-final
Bt rice presentation-finalBt rice presentation-final
Bt rice presentation-final
babbileo
 
Genetic Engineering Final
Genetic Engineering FinalGenetic Engineering Final
Genetic Engineering Final
sarahgreenberg
 
Golden rice-and-bt-crops-los-banos-phil-08-24-2011
Golden rice-and-bt-crops-los-banos-phil-08-24-2011Golden rice-and-bt-crops-los-banos-phil-08-24-2011
Golden rice-and-bt-crops-los-banos-phil-08-24-2011
Heba FromAlla
 
Bt maize insect resistance to lepidopteran pest
Bt maize insect resistance to lepidopteran pestBt maize insect resistance to lepidopteran pest
Bt maize insect resistance to lepidopteran pest
Pavan R
 
Insect resistance & future of bt transgenic crops
Insect  resistance & future of bt transgenic cropsInsect  resistance & future of bt transgenic crops
Insect resistance & future of bt transgenic crops
Surender Khatodia Ph.D
 

Viewers also liked (17)

Golden rice ppt
Golden rice pptGolden rice ppt
Golden rice ppt
 
Bacterial gene for crop improvement
Bacterial gene for crop improvementBacterial gene for crop improvement
Bacterial gene for crop improvement
 
Toefl I Bt Final Presentation 2010 Final Visual
Toefl I Bt Final Presentation 2010 Final VisualToefl I Bt Final Presentation 2010 Final Visual
Toefl I Bt Final Presentation 2010 Final Visual
 
Genetically modified crops
Genetically modified cropsGenetically modified crops
Genetically modified crops
 
Bt rice presentation-final
Bt rice presentation-finalBt rice presentation-final
Bt rice presentation-final
 
Genetic Engineering Final
Genetic Engineering FinalGenetic Engineering Final
Genetic Engineering Final
 
Golden rice-and-bt-crops-los-banos-phil-08-24-2011
Golden rice-and-bt-crops-los-banos-phil-08-24-2011Golden rice-and-bt-crops-los-banos-phil-08-24-2011
Golden rice-and-bt-crops-los-banos-phil-08-24-2011
 
Top Players Filing Patents & Protecting Intellectual Property in Biochemistry...
Top Players Filing Patents & Protecting Intellectual Property in Biochemistry...Top Players Filing Patents & Protecting Intellectual Property in Biochemistry...
Top Players Filing Patents & Protecting Intellectual Property in Biochemistry...
 
Bt maize insect resistance to lepidopteran pest
Bt maize insect resistance to lepidopteran pestBt maize insect resistance to lepidopteran pest
Bt maize insect resistance to lepidopteran pest
 
Major Genetically Modified Crops
Major Genetically Modified CropsMajor Genetically Modified Crops
Major Genetically Modified Crops
 
GM CROPS (GENETICALLY MODIFIED CROPS)
GM CROPS (GENETICALLY MODIFIED CROPS)GM CROPS (GENETICALLY MODIFIED CROPS)
GM CROPS (GENETICALLY MODIFIED CROPS)
 
Bt Corn
Bt CornBt Corn
Bt Corn
 
Golden rice
Golden riceGolden rice
Golden rice
 
Insect resistance & future of bt transgenic crops
Insect  resistance & future of bt transgenic cropsInsect  resistance & future of bt transgenic crops
Insect resistance & future of bt transgenic crops
 
Bt brinjal controversy
Bt brinjal controversyBt brinjal controversy
Bt brinjal controversy
 
Golden rice ppt
Golden rice pptGolden rice ppt
Golden rice ppt
 
Bt brinjal good technology product
Bt brinjal good technology productBt brinjal good technology product
Bt brinjal good technology product
 

Similar to BT crops

Bt cotton presentation12
Bt cotton presentation12Bt cotton presentation12
Bt cotton presentation12
jyots23
 
The Concepts and Development of BT Crops.pptx
The Concepts and Development of BT Crops.pptxThe Concepts and Development of BT Crops.pptx
The Concepts and Development of BT Crops.pptx
JaneeRamirez1
 

Similar to BT crops (20)

Insecticidal toxin of
Insecticidal toxin ofInsecticidal toxin of
Insecticidal toxin of
 
Biotechnology-in-Plant-Science.pptx
Biotechnology-in-Plant-Science.pptxBiotechnology-in-Plant-Science.pptx
Biotechnology-in-Plant-Science.pptx
 
Resistance to biotic stresses
Resistance to biotic stressesResistance to biotic stresses
Resistance to biotic stresses
 
Pest resistance
Pest resistancePest resistance
Pest resistance
 
Bt cotton presentation12
Bt cotton presentation12Bt cotton presentation12
Bt cotton presentation12
 
Biotechnology
BiotechnologyBiotechnology
Biotechnology
 
Bt cotton
Bt cottonBt cotton
Bt cotton
 
Presentation- Bt cotton.pdf
Presentation- Bt cotton.pdfPresentation- Bt cotton.pdf
Presentation- Bt cotton.pdf
 
Bacillus thurigenesis
Bacillus thurigenesisBacillus thurigenesis
Bacillus thurigenesis
 
Ajit Doctoral I Seminar.pptx
Ajit Doctoral I Seminar.pptxAjit Doctoral I Seminar.pptx
Ajit Doctoral I Seminar.pptx
 
The Concepts and Development of BT Crops.pptx
The Concepts and Development of BT Crops.pptxThe Concepts and Development of BT Crops.pptx
The Concepts and Development of BT Crops.pptx
 
Bio-control agents: Insecticidal toxins of Bacillus thuringiensis
Bio-control agents:Insecticidal toxins of Bacillus thuringiensisBio-control agents:Insecticidal toxins of Bacillus thuringiensis
Bio-control agents: Insecticidal toxins of Bacillus thuringiensis
 
Bt corn
Bt cornBt corn
Bt corn
 
Insect Pest resistance - A Biotechnology Approach
Insect Pest resistance - A Biotechnology ApproachInsect Pest resistance - A Biotechnology Approach
Insect Pest resistance - A Biotechnology Approach
 
Bt cotton by utkarsh
Bt cotton by utkarshBt cotton by utkarsh
Bt cotton by utkarsh
 
Entomopathogenic oke
Entomopathogenic okeEntomopathogenic oke
Entomopathogenic oke
 
Milho B T
Milho B TMilho B T
Milho B T
 
Pest and herbicide resistance
Pest and herbicide resistancePest and herbicide resistance
Pest and herbicide resistance
 
Genetic engineering and development of transgenic plants
Genetic engineering and development of transgenic plantsGenetic engineering and development of transgenic plants
Genetic engineering and development of transgenic plants
 
Microbial control of insect pests
Microbial control of insect pestsMicrobial control of insect pests
Microbial control of insect pests
 

Recently uploaded

Cloud Frontiers: A Deep Dive into Serverless Spatial Data and FME
Cloud Frontiers:  A Deep Dive into Serverless Spatial Data and FMECloud Frontiers:  A Deep Dive into Serverless Spatial Data and FME
Cloud Frontiers: A Deep Dive into Serverless Spatial Data and FME
Safe Software
 
TrustArc Webinar - Unified Trust Center for Privacy, Security, Compliance, an...
TrustArc Webinar - Unified Trust Center for Privacy, Security, Compliance, an...TrustArc Webinar - Unified Trust Center for Privacy, Security, Compliance, an...
TrustArc Webinar - Unified Trust Center for Privacy, Security, Compliance, an...
TrustArc
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Less Is More: Utilizing Ballerina to Architect a Cloud Data Platform
Less Is More: Utilizing Ballerina to Architect a Cloud Data PlatformLess Is More: Utilizing Ballerina to Architect a Cloud Data Platform
Less Is More: Utilizing Ballerina to Architect a Cloud Data Platform
 
Six Myths about Ontologies: The Basics of Formal Ontology
Six Myths about Ontologies: The Basics of Formal OntologySix Myths about Ontologies: The Basics of Formal Ontology
Six Myths about Ontologies: The Basics of Formal Ontology
 
Cloud Frontiers: A Deep Dive into Serverless Spatial Data and FME
Cloud Frontiers:  A Deep Dive into Serverless Spatial Data and FMECloud Frontiers:  A Deep Dive into Serverless Spatial Data and FME
Cloud Frontiers: A Deep Dive into Serverless Spatial Data and FME
 
WSO2 Micro Integrator for Enterprise Integration in a Decentralized, Microser...
WSO2 Micro Integrator for Enterprise Integration in a Decentralized, Microser...WSO2 Micro Integrator for Enterprise Integration in a Decentralized, Microser...
WSO2 Micro Integrator for Enterprise Integration in a Decentralized, Microser...
 
TrustArc Webinar - Unlock the Power of AI-Driven Data Discovery
TrustArc Webinar - Unlock the Power of AI-Driven Data DiscoveryTrustArc Webinar - Unlock the Power of AI-Driven Data Discovery
TrustArc Webinar - Unlock the Power of AI-Driven Data Discovery
 
Web Form Automation for Bonterra Impact Management (fka Social Solutions Apri...
Web Form Automation for Bonterra Impact Management (fka Social Solutions Apri...Web Form Automation for Bonterra Impact Management (fka Social Solutions Apri...
Web Form Automation for Bonterra Impact Management (fka Social Solutions Apri...
 
Navigating Identity and Access Management in the Modern Enterprise
Navigating Identity and Access Management in the Modern EnterpriseNavigating Identity and Access Management in the Modern Enterprise
Navigating Identity and Access Management in the Modern Enterprise
 
TrustArc Webinar - Unified Trust Center for Privacy, Security, Compliance, an...
TrustArc Webinar - Unified Trust Center for Privacy, Security, Compliance, an...TrustArc Webinar - Unified Trust Center for Privacy, Security, Compliance, an...
TrustArc Webinar - Unified Trust Center for Privacy, Security, Compliance, an...
 
DBX First Quarter 2024 Investor Presentation
DBX First Quarter 2024 Investor PresentationDBX First Quarter 2024 Investor Presentation
DBX First Quarter 2024 Investor Presentation
 
JohnPollard-hybrid-app-RailsConf2024.pptx
JohnPollard-hybrid-app-RailsConf2024.pptxJohnPollard-hybrid-app-RailsConf2024.pptx
JohnPollard-hybrid-app-RailsConf2024.pptx
 
Exploring Multimodal Embeddings with Milvus
Exploring Multimodal Embeddings with MilvusExploring Multimodal Embeddings with Milvus
Exploring Multimodal Embeddings with Milvus
 
Understanding the FAA Part 107 License ..
Understanding the FAA Part 107 License ..Understanding the FAA Part 107 License ..
Understanding the FAA Part 107 License ..
 
Quantum Leap in Next-Generation Computing
Quantum Leap in Next-Generation ComputingQuantum Leap in Next-Generation Computing
Quantum Leap in Next-Generation Computing
 
Navigating the Deluge_ Dubai Floods and the Resilience of Dubai International...
Navigating the Deluge_ Dubai Floods and the Resilience of Dubai International...Navigating the Deluge_ Dubai Floods and the Resilience of Dubai International...
Navigating the Deluge_ Dubai Floods and the Resilience of Dubai International...
 
Corporate and higher education May webinar.pptx
Corporate and higher education May webinar.pptxCorporate and higher education May webinar.pptx
Corporate and higher education May webinar.pptx
 
Introduction to use of FHIR Documents in ABDM
Introduction to use of FHIR Documents in ABDMIntroduction to use of FHIR Documents in ABDM
Introduction to use of FHIR Documents in ABDM
 
Decarbonising Commercial Real Estate: The Role of Operational Performance
Decarbonising Commercial Real Estate: The Role of Operational PerformanceDecarbonising Commercial Real Estate: The Role of Operational Performance
Decarbonising Commercial Real Estate: The Role of Operational Performance
 
JavaScript Usage Statistics 2024 - The Ultimate Guide
JavaScript Usage Statistics 2024 - The Ultimate GuideJavaScript Usage Statistics 2024 - The Ultimate Guide
JavaScript Usage Statistics 2024 - The Ultimate Guide
 
Connector Corner: Accelerate revenue generation using UiPath API-centric busi...
Connector Corner: Accelerate revenue generation using UiPath API-centric busi...Connector Corner: Accelerate revenue generation using UiPath API-centric busi...
Connector Corner: Accelerate revenue generation using UiPath API-centric busi...
 
Repurposing LNG terminals for Hydrogen Ammonia: Feasibility and Cost Saving
Repurposing LNG terminals for Hydrogen Ammonia: Feasibility and Cost SavingRepurposing LNG terminals for Hydrogen Ammonia: Feasibility and Cost Saving
Repurposing LNG terminals for Hydrogen Ammonia: Feasibility and Cost Saving
 

BT crops

  • 1. Presented By M.Z.Arifeen M.Phil Scholar Department of Biotech University of Malakand. Date of Presentation 10/02/2014
  • 2. •Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) is a Gram-positive, spore forming, soil bacterium. •When resources are limited, vegetative Bt cells undergo sporulation, synthesizing a protein crystal, the insecticidal crystal proteins (ICPs) or Cry Proteins. •These Cry proteins are coded by genes (cry genes) harbored in megaplasmids • For over 50 years, Bt has been applied to crops in spray form as an insecticide, containing a mixture of spores and the associated protein crystals • The development and commercialization of insect-resistant transgenic Bt crops expressing Cry toxins revolutionized the history of agriculture •High specificity and potency, •Reduction in chemical pesticide applications, • Increased crop yield.
  • 3. • The Cry protein is made as an inactive protoxin. • Cry protein has to be eaten to cause mortality. • Conversion of the protoxin (e.g., 130 kDa) into the active toxin (e.g., 68 kDa) called delta endotoxin requires the combination of a slightly alkaline pH (7.5-8) and the action of a specific protease(s) found in the insect gut • The active toxin binds to protein receptors on the insect gut epithelial cell membrane. • The toxin forms pores in the insect gut.
  • 4.
  • 5.
  • 6. B. thuringienis parasporal crystal composed of Cry1 protoxin protein. Conversion of the 130-kDa protoxin into an active 68-kDa toxin requires an alkaline environment (pH 7.5 to 8) and the action of a specific protease, both of which are found in the insect gut. The activated toxin binds to protein receptors on the insect gut epithelial cells.
  • 7. CADR= Cadherin receptor ALP=Alkaline phosphatase GCR =Glyco-conjugate receptor APN=Amino peptidase - N Receptors for Bt Toxin
  • 8. BT crystalline Toxin 200px. Normal gut bacteria BT SPORES
  • 9. • There are three domains in this delta endotoxin. • Domain I and Domain II are very conservative. • Domain III is highly variable to attach to different receptors. • There are over 200 known variants for this cry or cryt protein • Domain I is the prime candidate for formation of the transmembrane lytic pore. • Domain II is believed to have a major role in receptor binding and thus in specificity determination • domain III of the Bt toxin structure may play some role in protecting the toxins against gut proteolysis.
  • 10. Bt action is very specific. Different strains of Bt are specific to different receptors in insect gut wall. Bt toxicity depends on recognizing receptors, damage to the gut by the toxin occurs upon binding to a receptor. Each insect species possesses different types of receptors that will match only certain toxin proteins, like a lock to a key. The crystal proteins bind specifically to certain receptors in the insect's intestine. Not all insects carry the same receptors allowing for high species specificity. Humans and other vertabrates do not have these receptors in their bodies, so the toxin is unable to affect us. It is because of this that farmers have to be careful to match the target pest species with a particular Bt toxin protein which is specific for that insect. This also helps the beneficial insects because they will usually not be harmed by that particular strain of Bt.
  • 11. Japanese biologist, Shigetane Ishiwatari was investigating the cause of the sotto disease (sudden- collapse disease) that was killing large populations of silkworms when he first isolated the bacterium Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) as the cause of the disease in 1901.  Ernst Berliner isolated a bacteria that had killed a Mediterranean flour moth in 1911, and rediscovered Bt. He named it Bacillus thuringiensis, after the German town Thuringia where the moth was found.  In 1915, Berliner reported the existence of a crystal protein within Bt.
  • 12.  Farmers started to use Bt as a pesticide in 1920. France soon started to make commercialized spore based formulations called Sporine in 1938  These Bt pesticide were used in the form of spray.
  • 13. Bt products such as sprays are rapidly washed away by rain, and degrade under the sun's UV rays. there were many insects that are not susceptible to any of the limited number of Bt strains known at the time. All the Bt strains known at the time were toxic to lepidopteran (moth) larvae only. There were also some insects that live within the plant or underground where the Bt sprays could not reach.
  • 14. • Bt plants have genes for the Bt toxins engineered to produce ICP toxic to the pest species of concern. • As the insect feeds on the Bt plant, it ingests the ICP and suffers the same fate as if it ingested leaf tissue sprayed with Bt. • At the end of 2010, an estimated 26.3 million hectares of land were planted with crops containing the Bt gene globally(James 2011). The chief advantages to Bt plants: • The pests hiding inside plant parts controlled effectively; • Multiple sprays are not needed; • Give opportunity to get rid of chemical pesticide like DDT, Organophosphate etc • A disadvantage of Bt plants is that insect-specific ICPs cannot be changed during a growing season.
  • 15. •As it turns out, nature has its own biotechnologist called Agrobacterium tumefaciens which induces the growth of tumours on woody plants. These tumours are engineered by A.tumefaciens to produce a special food for the bacteria (opines) that plants normally cannot make. •These tumours arise from a unique bacterial transformation mechanism involving the Ti-plasmid which coordinates the random insertion of a subset of its DNA (t-DNA) containing opine synthase genes into a plant chromosome. By replacing portions of the t-DNA sequence with genes of interest (such as Cry). •Researchers have been able to use this transformational mechanism and confer new traits to many flowering plants including grasses such as corn and rice etc.
  • 16.
  • 17. In March 1995, the first Bt crop deregulated in the U.S. were seven lines of Colorado Potato Beetle Resistant Bt Potato by Monsanto. Since then, many more Bt crops have been deregulated, engineered to produce a variety of different Bt proteins from various subspecies of Bt. Bt crops include: Corn: European Corn Borer Resistant Corn (first deregulated in the U.S. in May 1995) Corn Rootworm Resistant Corn (first deregulated in the U.S. in October 2002) Cotton: Lepidopteran Resistant Cotton (first deregulated in the U.S. in June 1995) Potato: Colorado Potato Beetle Resistant Bt Potato (first deregulated in the U.S. in March 1995) Potato Tuber Moth Resistant Bt Potato (being developed in South Africa) Soybean: Bt Soybean (first deregulated in the U.S. in October 2011, not yet sold commercially) Tomato: Lepidopteran Resistant Tomato (first deregulated in the U.S. in March 1998, not yet sold commercially)
  • 18. Kurstaki strain (Biobit, Dipel, MVP, Steward, Thuricide, etc.): Vegetable insects Cabbage worm (cabbage looper, imported cabbageworm, diamondback moth, etc.). Tomato and tobacco hornworm. Field and forage crop insects European corn borer (granular formulations have given good control of first generation corn borers). Alfalfa caterpillar, alfalfa webworm. Fruit crop insects Leafroller. Achemon sphinx. .
  • 19. Tree and shrub insects Tent caterpillar. Fall webworm. Spiny elm caterpillar. Western spruce budworm. Israelensis strains (Vectobac, Mosquito Dunks, Gnatrol, Bactimos, etc.) Mosquito. Black fly. Fungus gnat. San diego/tenebrionis strains (Trident, M-One, M-Trak, Foil, Novodor, etc.) Colorado potato beetle. Elm leaf beetle. Cottonwood leaf beetle
  • 20. • The specific activity of Bt generally is considered highly beneficial. Unlike most insecticides, Bt insecticides do not have a broad spectrum of activity, so they do not kill beneficial insects. This includes the natural enemies of insects (predators and parasites), as well as beneficial pollinators, such as honeybees • Perhaps the major advantage is that Bt is essentially nontoxic to people, pets and wildlife. This high margin of safety recommends its use on food Crops or in other sensitive sites where pesticide use can cause adverse effects. • Used as alternative to DDT and organophosphates since 1920s
  • 21. • Together with the reduction of pesticide application and cost reduction, Bt crops have brought tremendous benefit to both the environment and farmers . • Expanded use of transgenic crops for insect control will likely include more varieties with combinations of two or more Bt toxins, novel Bt toxins • Modified Bt toxins that have been genetically engineered to kill insects resistant to standard Bt toxins.

Editor's Notes

  1. B. thuringiensis is actually a very close relative of B. cereus, a common food poisoning bacterium. The main difference is that most B. thuringiensis strains carry plasmids or self-replicating extrachromosomal DNA molecules, coding for the production of the insecticidal substances. These plasmids are self-transmissible from one B. thuringiensis to another (Wilcks and others 1998) and would show even in the gut conditions clearly the highest potential of being transferred from a bacterium to another.In a plasmid pattern, two different groups of plasmids can be recognized: those that are ≤30 MDa and those that are ≥30 MDa, called megaplasmids.These Cry proteins are coded by genes (cry genes) harbored in megaplasmidsBacillus thuringiensis is a Gram-positive
  2. Bacillus thuringiensis forms parasporal crystals during the stationary phase of its growth cycle. These crystals are specifically toxic to certain orders and species of insects, like Lepidoptera, Diptera, and ColeopteraDuring sporulation, it synthesizes a cytoplasmic inclusion containing one or more proteins that are toxic to insect larvae. Upon completion of sporulation the parent bacterium lyses to release the spore and the inclusion. In these inclusions, the toxins exist as inactive protoxins. When the inclusions are ingested by insect larvae, the alkaline pH solubilizes the crystal. The protoxin is then converted in to an active toxin after processing by the host proteases present in the midgut.It has been indicated that the activated toxin binds to insect-specific receptors exposed on the surface of the plasma membrane of midgut epithelial cells and then inserts into the membrane to create transmembrane pores that cause cell swelling and lysis and eventually death of the insect. 
  3. The Cry toxin molecules attach themselves to specific locations on the cadherin-like proteins present on the epithelial cells of the midge and ion channels are formed which allow the flow of potassium.[3] Regulation of potassium concentration is essential and if left unchecked causes death of cells. Due to the formation of Cry ion channels sufficient regulation of potassium ions is lost and results in the death of epithelial cells. The death of such cells creates gaps in the brush border membrane. The gaps then allow bacteria and (Bt) spores to enter the body cavity resulting in the death of the organism.Cadherins (named for "calcium-dependent adhesion") are a class of type-1 transmembrane proteins. They play important roles in cell adhesion, forming adherens junctions to bind cells within tissues together. They are dependent on calcium (Ca2+) ions to function, hence their nameAlkaline phosphatase (ALP, ALKP) (EC 3.1.3.1) is a hydrolase enzyme responsible for removing phosphate groups from many types of molecules, including nucleotides, proteins, and alkaloids. The process of removing the phosphate group is calleddephosphorylation. As the name suggests, alkaline phosphatases are most effective in an alkaline environment. It is sometimes used synonymously as basic phosphataseGlycoconjugates is the general classification for carbohydrates covalently linked with other chemical species such as proteins, peptides, lipids and saccharides.[1]Glycoconjugates are very important compounds in biology and consist of many different categories such as glycoproteins, glycopeptides, peptidoglycans, glycolipids,glycosides and lipopolysaccharides. They are involved in cell–cell interactions, including cell–cell recognition; in cell–matrix interactions; in detoxification processes.Aminopeptidase N is located in the small-intestinal and renal microvillar membrane, and also in other plasma membranes. In the small intestine aminopeptidase N plays a role in the final digestion of peptides generated from hydrolysis of proteins by gastric and pancreatic proteases
  4. Septicemia: the presence of pathogenic bacteria in the bloodstream.Even though the toxin does not kill the insect immediately, treated plant parts will not be damaged because the insect stops feeding within hours. Bt spores do not spread to other insects or cause disease outbreaks on their own.
  5. Domain I is composed of a 7 helix bundle. This domain is the prime candidate for formation of the transmembranelytic pore. Mutations in this domain frequently yield toxins that bind receptor but fail to insert in the membrane.Domain II is believed to have a major role in receptor binding and thus in specificity determinationDomain III at the C-terminus of the molecule, is a sandwich of two twisted antiparallel beta-sheets in a so-called "jelly-roll" topology. This domain has also been implicated in the determination of insect specificity. It was originally suggested that the two twisted antiparallel beta-sheets (jelly roll) that make up domain III of the Bt toxin structure may play some role in protecting the toxins against gut proteolysis.
  6. Delta endotoxins (δ-endotoxins, also called Cry and Cyt toxins) are pore-forming toxins produced by Bacillus thuringiensisspecies of bacteria. They are useful for their insecticidal action.During spore formation the bacteria produce crystals of this protein. When an insect ingests these proteins, they are activated by proteolytic cleavage. The N-terminus is cleaved in all of the proteins and a C-terminal extension is cleaved in some members. Once activated, the endotoxin binds to the gut epithelium and causes cell lysis by the formation of cation-selective channels, which leads to death. The activated region of the delta toxin is composed of three distinct structural domains: an N-terminal helical bundle domain (IPR005639) involved in membrane insertion and pore formation; a beta-sheet central domain involved in receptor binding; and a C-terminal beta-sandwich domain (IPR005638) that interacts with the N-terminal domain to form a channel.[2][3][4][5]
  7. Bt is susceptible to degradation by sunlight. Most formulations persist on foliage less than a week following application. Some of the newer strains developed for leaf beetle control become ineffective in about 24 hours.The highly specific activity of Bt insecticides might limit their use on Crops where problems with several pests occur, including nonsusceptible insects (aphids, grasshoppers, etc.). As strictly a stomach poison insecticide, Bt must be eaten to be effective, and application coverage must be thorough. This further limits its usefulness against pests that are susceptible to Bt but rarely have an opportunity to eat it in field use, such as codling moth or corn earworm that tunnel into plants. Additives (sticking or wetting agents) often are useful in a Bt application to improve performance, allowing it to cover and resist washing.Since Bt does not kill rapidly, users may incorrectly assume that it is ineffective a day or two after treatment. This, however, is merely a perceptual problem, because Bt-affected insects eat little or nothing before they die.Bt-based products tend to have a shorter shelf life than other insecticides. Manufacturers generally indicate reduced effectiveness after two to three years of storage. Liquid formulations are more perishable than dry formulations. Shelf life is greatest when storage conditions are cool, dry and out of direct sunlight.
  8. ControversiesInsect ResistancePrior to the use of Bt in GMOs, issues with Bt resistance evolving in pests were unlikely due to the brief and infrequent exposures to Bt pests experienced. Following an application of Bt, the majority of pests would die, and then the Bt would degrade within a week. A farmer might apply Bt one more time, to kill any insects that hatched after the first application of Bt. Still, insects were not exposed to Bt for a very long period of time, giving them little opportunity to evolve resistance.However, with the advent and widespread use of Bt toxin by GMOs, pests have more opportunities to evolve resistance to Bt. Bt resistance in corn pests was first observed in 2011. For more information, see the article on Bt-Resistant Insects.Safety of Bt CropsA 2010 study published in the journal Reproductive Toxicology found that "3-MPPA and Cry1Ab toxin are clearly detectable and appear to cross the placenta to the fetus."[2] 3-MPPA, or 3-methylphosphinicopropionic acid, is a metabolite of the pesticide gluphosinate ammonium, which is used in some genetically engineered crops. The Cry1Ab is the insecticidal protein produced by Bt crops. The study found that the "Cry1Ab toxin was detected in 93% and 80% of maternal and fetal blood samples, respectively and in 69% of tested blood samples from nonpregnant women." The study authors speculated this was due to consumption of contaminated meat, i.e meat from animals fed Bt corn that had retained the Cry1Ab protein in their flesh
  9. Other concerns involve the safety of Bt transgenic crops to non-target organisms. Safety studies have demonstrated that vertebrate stomach juices rapidly inactivate Bt proteinsDr. Mezzomo and his team of Scientists from the Department of Genetics and Morphology and the Institute of Biological Sciences, at University of Brasilia recently published a study that involved Bacillus thuringensis (Bt toxin) and its effects on mammalian blood. According to the study, the “Cry” toxins that are found in Monsanto’s GMO crops like corn and soy, are much more toxic to mammals than previously thought. The study was published in the Journal of Hematology and Thromboembolic Diseases(1).Scientists tested levels ranging from 27 mg to 270 mg over a seven day period, it was remarkably evident that the Cry toxins were hemotoxic, even at the lowest doses administered. Hemotoxins destroy red blood cells, disrupt blood clotting and cause organ degeneration and tissue damage.The number of RBC’s, (red blood cells) as well as their size, were significantly reduced, and so were the levels of hemoglobin for oxygen to attach to. Every factor regarding RBC’s indicated some level of damage for all levels of toxin administered and across all cry proteins. The tests clearly demonstrated that Cry proteins resulting from the Bt toxin were cytotoxic (quality of being toxic to cells) to bone marrow cells. Studies contiually show that these proteins kill blood cells bytargeting the cell membranes of RBC’s.