SlideShare a Scribd company logo
Brown vs. board of education  1954 US Supreme Court case Lucy Eccleston Norvall
Background: Plessy v. Ferguson After the end of the American Civil War in 1865, during the period known as Reconstruction, the government was able to provide some protection for the civil rights of the newly-freed slaves.  Reconstruction abruptly ended with the Compromise of 1877 and federal troops were withdrawn, southern state governments began passing Jim Crow Laws that prohibited blacks from using the same public accommodations as whites.
Plessy v. Ferguson (Continued) Plessy v. Ferguson, (1896), is a landmark U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the constitutionality of racial segregation  under the docterine of “separate but equal“ "Separate but equal" remained standard doctrine in U.S. law until Brown Vs. Board of Education.
Plessy vs. Ferguson In 1890, the State of Louisiana passed Act 111 that required separate accommodations for African Americans and Whites on railroads, including separate railway cars, though it specified that the accommodations must be kept "equal".  Concerned, several African Americans (including Louisiana's former governer PBS Pinchback) and Whites in New Orleans formed an association, the Citizens' Committee to Test the Separate Car Act, dedicated to the repeal of that law. They raised $1412.70 ($33711.21 in 2008 USD) which they offered to the then-famous author and Radical Republican jurist, Albion W. Tourgée, to serve as lead counsel for their test case.  Tourgée agreed to do it for free. Later, they enlisted Homer Plessy, who was one-eighth black, to take part in an act of planned civil disobedience. The plan was for Plessy to be thrown off the railway car and arrestedbut for violating the Separate Car Act, which could and did lead to a challenge with the high court. The Committee hired a detective to ensure that Plessy was arrested for violating the Separate Car Act, which the Citizen's Committee wanted to challenge with the goal of having it overturned. They chose Plessy because, with his light skin color, he could buy a first class train ticket and, at the same time, be arrested when he announced, while sitting on board the train, that he had an African-American ancestor. For the Committee, this was a deliberate attempt to exploit the lack of clear racial definition in either science or law so as to argue that segregation by race was an "unreasonable" use of state power. The intellectual roots of Plessy v. Ferguson were in part tied to the scientific racism of the era. However, the popular support for the decision was more likely a result of the racist beliefs held by most whites at the time.[3
Plessy V. Ferguson (Continued) Thirteenth Amendment Section 1. Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction. Fourteenth Amendment Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the Plessy boarded a car of the East Louisiana Railroad that was designated for use by white patrons only.  He was able to purchase a ticket in first class because his light skin color, but was later asked to leave the car. Plessy refused to leave and was arrested. He sued the state of LA for infringing on his rights of the 13th and 14th Amendments.  privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
Plessy vs. Ferguson (cont’d) However, the judge presiding over his case, John Ferguson, ruled that Louisiana had the right to regulate railroad companies as long as they operated within state boundaries.  The Committee of Citizens took Plessy's appeal to the Supreme Court of Louisiana, which ruled with the state AGAIN.  The committee appealed to the United States Supreme Court in 1896. The Supreme Court sided with LA and RACIAL SEGREGATION WAS WRITTEN INTO US LAW.
Brown vs. Board of Education 1951 For next 90 years,  “separate but equal “doctrine ruled the land.  In 1951, a class action suit was filed against the Board of Education of the City of Topeka, Kansas in the U.S. District Court for the District of Kansas. The plaintiffs were thirteen Topeka parents on behalf of their twenty children.
Brown vs. Board of Education The suit called for the school district to reverse its policy of racial segregation. Separate elementary schools were operated by the Topeka Board of Education under an 1879 Kansas law, which permitted (but did not require) districts to maintain separate elementary school facilities for black and white students in twelve communities with populations over 15,000. The plaintiffs had been recruited by the leadership of the Topeka NAACP.  The named plaintiff, Oliver Brown, was a parent of Linda, a third grader, had to walk six blocks to her school bus stop to ride to Monroe Elementary, her segregated black school, which was  one mile (1.6 km) away, while Sumner Elementary, a white school, was seven blocks from her house.
Brown vs. Board of Education As directed by the NAACP leadership, the parents each attempted to enroll their children in the closest neighborhood school in the fall of 1951. They were each refused enrollment and directed to the segregated schools. Linda Brown Thompson later recalled the experience in a 2004 PBS documentary: The District Court ruled in favor of the Board of Education, citing the Plessy vs. Ferguson, (1896), which had upheld a state law requiring "separate but equal" segregated facilities for blacks and whites in railway cars The three-judge District Court panel found that segregation in public education has a detrimental effect upon negro children, but denied relief on the ground that the negro and white schools in Topeka were substantially equal with respect to buildings, transportation, curricular, and educational qualifications of teachers. The NAACP took the case to Supreme Court.
Brown vs. Board of Education Handed down on May 17, 1954, the Court's unanimous (9-0) decision stated that "separate educational facilities are inherently unequal." As a result, de jure racial segregation  was ruled a violation of the Equal Rights Amendment of the 14th Amendment of the US Constitution.

More Related Content

What's hot

Racial Segregation
Racial SegregationRacial Segregation
Racial Segregation
Ragaytone
 
Civil Rights Movement
Civil Rights MovementCivil Rights Movement
Civil Rights Movement
Aaron Grifhorst
 
Plessy vs ferguson
Plessy vs fergusonPlessy vs ferguson
Plessy vs fergusonKeri Hays
 
Brown vs board of education
Brown vs board of educationBrown vs board of education
Brown vs board of education
tritondboyle
 
Racial Segregation
Racial SegregationRacial Segregation
Racial Segregationallie9
 
American Civil Rights Movement
American Civil Rights MovementAmerican Civil Rights Movement
American Civil Rights MovementKristina Bowers
 
Segregation 20 powerpoint
Segregation 20 powerpointSegregation 20 powerpoint
Segregation 20 powerpointmradrian777
 
Marbury v madison (1)
Marbury v madison (1)Marbury v madison (1)
Marbury v madison (1)
Bo Chamberlain
 
Montgomery Bus Boycott
Montgomery Bus BoycottMontgomery Bus Boycott
Montgomery Bus Boycott
RCB78
 
Jim crow laws
Jim crow laws Jim crow laws
Jim crow laws
Elhem Chniti
 
Women's Rights History in the U.S.
Women's Rights History in the U.S.Women's Rights History in the U.S.
Women's Rights History in the U.S.
Cory Plough
 
Booker T. Washington
Booker T. WashingtonBooker T. Washington
Booker T. Washingtonguesta46e4cb
 
Tinker Vs. Des Moines
Tinker Vs. Des MoinesTinker Vs. Des Moines
Tinker Vs. Des Moines
Todd Beach
 
US civil rights Movement
US civil rights MovementUS civil rights Movement
US civil rights Movement
daviddunlop1
 
Reconstruction Slideshow
Reconstruction SlideshowReconstruction Slideshow
Reconstruction Slideshow
Charles Kane
 
Ppt 10 jim crow laws
Ppt 10 jim crow lawsPpt 10 jim crow laws
Ppt 10 jim crow laws
DB3igs
 
Little Rock Nine
Little Rock NineLittle Rock Nine
Little Rock Ninenstechfun
 

What's hot (20)

Racial Segregation
Racial SegregationRacial Segregation
Racial Segregation
 
Civil Rights Movement
Civil Rights MovementCivil Rights Movement
Civil Rights Movement
 
Plessy vs ferguson
Plessy vs fergusonPlessy vs ferguson
Plessy vs ferguson
 
Brown vs board of education
Brown vs board of educationBrown vs board of education
Brown vs board of education
 
Racial Segregation
Racial SegregationRacial Segregation
Racial Segregation
 
Jim Crow
Jim CrowJim Crow
Jim Crow
 
Civil Rights Movement
Civil Rights MovementCivil Rights Movement
Civil Rights Movement
 
American Civil Rights Movement
American Civil Rights MovementAmerican Civil Rights Movement
American Civil Rights Movement
 
Segregation 20 powerpoint
Segregation 20 powerpointSegregation 20 powerpoint
Segregation 20 powerpoint
 
Marbury v madison (1)
Marbury v madison (1)Marbury v madison (1)
Marbury v madison (1)
 
Montgomery Bus Boycott
Montgomery Bus BoycottMontgomery Bus Boycott
Montgomery Bus Boycott
 
Jim crow laws
Jim crow laws Jim crow laws
Jim crow laws
 
Women's Rights History in the U.S.
Women's Rights History in the U.S.Women's Rights History in the U.S.
Women's Rights History in the U.S.
 
Chief Joseph
Chief JosephChief Joseph
Chief Joseph
 
Booker T. Washington
Booker T. WashingtonBooker T. Washington
Booker T. Washington
 
Tinker Vs. Des Moines
Tinker Vs. Des MoinesTinker Vs. Des Moines
Tinker Vs. Des Moines
 
US civil rights Movement
US civil rights MovementUS civil rights Movement
US civil rights Movement
 
Reconstruction Slideshow
Reconstruction SlideshowReconstruction Slideshow
Reconstruction Slideshow
 
Ppt 10 jim crow laws
Ppt 10 jim crow lawsPpt 10 jim crow laws
Ppt 10 jim crow laws
 
Little Rock Nine
Little Rock NineLittle Rock Nine
Little Rock Nine
 

Viewers also liked

Roe V Wade Finished Ppt
Roe V Wade Finished PptRoe V Wade Finished Ppt
Roe V Wade Finished Ppt
thailandbabe004
 
Brown vs board presentation 032812
Brown vs board presentation 032812Brown vs board presentation 032812
Brown vs board presentation 032812shuggins1
 
Plessy v ferguson presentation
Plessy v ferguson presentationPlessy v ferguson presentation
Plessy v ferguson presentation
PreshaylaJames
 
Mona Pexa In Re Gault
Mona Pexa In Re GaultMona Pexa In Re Gault
Mona Pexa In Re Gaultmarcus hurt
 
United states v. nixon
United states  v. nixonUnited states  v. nixon
United states v. nixonxsportz28
 
Roe v. Wade
Roe v. WadeRoe v. Wade
Roe v. Wademrgeib
 
BoyarMiller – Public/Private Partnerships: Basic Concepts and Examples of P3s
BoyarMiller – Public/Private Partnerships: Basic Concepts and Examples of P3sBoyarMiller – Public/Private Partnerships: Basic Concepts and Examples of P3s
BoyarMiller – Public/Private Partnerships: Basic Concepts and Examples of P3s
BoyarMiller
 
Landmark supreme court cases
Landmark supreme court casesLandmark supreme court cases
Landmark supreme court cases
Piers Midwinter
 
Supreme court Landmark Cases
Supreme court Landmark CasesSupreme court Landmark Cases
Supreme court Landmark CasesRCSDIT
 
Grutter v bollinger
Grutter v bollingerGrutter v bollinger
Grutter v bollinger
Jonathan Milner
 
District of columbia v. Heller
District of columbia v. HellerDistrict of columbia v. Heller
District of columbia v. Heller
Zachariah Bernard
 
McDonald vs chicago
McDonald vs chicagoMcDonald vs chicago
McDonald vs chicago
mariecalie
 

Viewers also liked (12)

Roe V Wade Finished Ppt
Roe V Wade Finished PptRoe V Wade Finished Ppt
Roe V Wade Finished Ppt
 
Brown vs board presentation 032812
Brown vs board presentation 032812Brown vs board presentation 032812
Brown vs board presentation 032812
 
Plessy v ferguson presentation
Plessy v ferguson presentationPlessy v ferguson presentation
Plessy v ferguson presentation
 
Mona Pexa In Re Gault
Mona Pexa In Re GaultMona Pexa In Re Gault
Mona Pexa In Re Gault
 
United states v. nixon
United states  v. nixonUnited states  v. nixon
United states v. nixon
 
Roe v. Wade
Roe v. WadeRoe v. Wade
Roe v. Wade
 
BoyarMiller – Public/Private Partnerships: Basic Concepts and Examples of P3s
BoyarMiller – Public/Private Partnerships: Basic Concepts and Examples of P3sBoyarMiller – Public/Private Partnerships: Basic Concepts and Examples of P3s
BoyarMiller – Public/Private Partnerships: Basic Concepts and Examples of P3s
 
Landmark supreme court cases
Landmark supreme court casesLandmark supreme court cases
Landmark supreme court cases
 
Supreme court Landmark Cases
Supreme court Landmark CasesSupreme court Landmark Cases
Supreme court Landmark Cases
 
Grutter v bollinger
Grutter v bollingerGrutter v bollinger
Grutter v bollinger
 
District of columbia v. Heller
District of columbia v. HellerDistrict of columbia v. Heller
District of columbia v. Heller
 
McDonald vs chicago
McDonald vs chicagoMcDonald vs chicago
McDonald vs chicago
 

Similar to Brown Vs Board Of Education

Plessy V Ferguson Essay
Plessy V Ferguson EssayPlessy V Ferguson Essay
Plessy V Ferguson Essay
Online Paper Writing Services Haynes
 
Ferguson Vs Plessy
Ferguson Vs PlessyFerguson Vs Plessy
Group 3 power point
Group 3 power pointGroup 3 power point
Group 3 power pointJacobsBr412
 
The Courts And The Pursuit Of School Integration
The Courts And The Pursuit Of School IntegrationThe Courts And The Pursuit Of School Integration
The Courts And The Pursuit Of School IntegrationJacobsBr412
 
Brown v. board of education
Brown v. board of educationBrown v. board of education
Brown v. board of educationhoppa1177
 
Conflicts Of Segregation 2
Conflicts Of Segregation 2Conflicts Of Segregation 2
Conflicts Of Segregation 2stoklosa
 
Dbq Plessy V. Ferguson
Dbq Plessy V. FergusonDbq Plessy V. Ferguson
Dbq Plessy V. Ferguson
Lisa Fields
 
4th Amendment...
4th Amendment...4th Amendment...
4th Amendment...Dana Leon
 
4th Amendment
4th Amendment4th Amendment
4th AmendmentDana Leon
 
Plessy v. Ferguson Case by Shruti Misra
Plessy v. Ferguson Case by Shruti MisraPlessy v. Ferguson Case by Shruti Misra
Plessy v. Ferguson Case by Shruti Misra
SHRUTIMISRA7
 
African american education 19th cent
African american education   19th centAfrican american education   19th cent
African american education 19th cent
MELINDA TOMPKINS
 
Important Supreme Court Cases
Important Supreme Court CasesImportant Supreme Court Cases
Important Supreme Court Cases
Cory Plough
 
Civil rights 2
Civil rights 2Civil rights 2
Civil rights 2
Asaad Asaad
 

Similar to Brown Vs Board Of Education (15)

Plessy V Ferguson Essay
Plessy V Ferguson EssayPlessy V Ferguson Essay
Plessy V Ferguson Essay
 
Ferguson Vs Plessy
Ferguson Vs PlessyFerguson Vs Plessy
Ferguson Vs Plessy
 
Group 3 power point
Group 3 power pointGroup 3 power point
Group 3 power point
 
The Courts And The Pursuit Of School Integration
The Courts And The Pursuit Of School IntegrationThe Courts And The Pursuit Of School Integration
The Courts And The Pursuit Of School Integration
 
Brown v. board of education
Brown v. board of educationBrown v. board of education
Brown v. board of education
 
Conflicts Of Segregation 2
Conflicts Of Segregation 2Conflicts Of Segregation 2
Conflicts Of Segregation 2
 
Dbq Plessy V. Ferguson
Dbq Plessy V. FergusonDbq Plessy V. Ferguson
Dbq Plessy V. Ferguson
 
Brown vs. boardmycom
Brown vs. boardmycomBrown vs. boardmycom
Brown vs. boardmycom
 
4th Amendment...
4th Amendment...4th Amendment...
4th Amendment...
 
4th Amendment
4th Amendment4th Amendment
4th Amendment
 
Plessy v. Ferguson Case by Shruti Misra
Plessy v. Ferguson Case by Shruti MisraPlessy v. Ferguson Case by Shruti Misra
Plessy v. Ferguson Case by Shruti Misra
 
African american education 19th cent
African american education   19th centAfrican american education   19th cent
African american education 19th cent
 
Important Supreme Court Cases
Important Supreme Court CasesImportant Supreme Court Cases
Important Supreme Court Cases
 
Civil rights 2
Civil rights 2Civil rights 2
Civil rights 2
 
Segregation
SegregationSegregation
Segregation
 

Recently uploaded

Francesca Gottschalk - How can education support child empowerment.pptx
Francesca Gottschalk - How can education support child empowerment.pptxFrancesca Gottschalk - How can education support child empowerment.pptx
Francesca Gottschalk - How can education support child empowerment.pptx
EduSkills OECD
 
Acetabularia Information For Class 9 .docx
Acetabularia Information For Class 9  .docxAcetabularia Information For Class 9  .docx
Acetabularia Information For Class 9 .docx
vaibhavrinwa19
 
Sha'Carri Richardson Presentation 202345
Sha'Carri Richardson Presentation 202345Sha'Carri Richardson Presentation 202345
Sha'Carri Richardson Presentation 202345
beazzy04
 
The French Revolution Class 9 Study Material pdf free download
The French Revolution Class 9 Study Material pdf free downloadThe French Revolution Class 9 Study Material pdf free download
The French Revolution Class 9 Study Material pdf free download
Vivekanand Anglo Vedic Academy
 
Welcome to TechSoup New Member Orientation and Q&A (May 2024).pdf
Welcome to TechSoup   New Member Orientation and Q&A (May 2024).pdfWelcome to TechSoup   New Member Orientation and Q&A (May 2024).pdf
Welcome to TechSoup New Member Orientation and Q&A (May 2024).pdf
TechSoup
 
Additional Benefits for Employee Website.pdf
Additional Benefits for Employee Website.pdfAdditional Benefits for Employee Website.pdf
Additional Benefits for Employee Website.pdf
joachimlavalley1
 
TESDA TM1 REVIEWER FOR NATIONAL ASSESSMENT WRITTEN AND ORAL QUESTIONS WITH A...
TESDA TM1 REVIEWER  FOR NATIONAL ASSESSMENT WRITTEN AND ORAL QUESTIONS WITH A...TESDA TM1 REVIEWER  FOR NATIONAL ASSESSMENT WRITTEN AND ORAL QUESTIONS WITH A...
TESDA TM1 REVIEWER FOR NATIONAL ASSESSMENT WRITTEN AND ORAL QUESTIONS WITH A...
EugeneSaldivar
 
The Challenger.pdf DNHS Official Publication
The Challenger.pdf DNHS Official PublicationThe Challenger.pdf DNHS Official Publication
The Challenger.pdf DNHS Official Publication
Delapenabediema
 
1.4 modern child centered education - mahatma gandhi-2.pptx
1.4 modern child centered education - mahatma gandhi-2.pptx1.4 modern child centered education - mahatma gandhi-2.pptx
1.4 modern child centered education - mahatma gandhi-2.pptx
JosvitaDsouza2
 
Honest Reviews of Tim Han LMA Course Program.pptx
Honest Reviews of Tim Han LMA Course Program.pptxHonest Reviews of Tim Han LMA Course Program.pptx
Honest Reviews of Tim Han LMA Course Program.pptx
timhan337
 
Phrasal Verbs.XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Phrasal Verbs.XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXPhrasal Verbs.XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Phrasal Verbs.XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
MIRIAMSALINAS13
 
The approach at University of Liverpool.pptx
The approach at University of Liverpool.pptxThe approach at University of Liverpool.pptx
The approach at University of Liverpool.pptx
Jisc
 
Palestine last event orientationfvgnh .pptx
Palestine last event orientationfvgnh .pptxPalestine last event orientationfvgnh .pptx
Palestine last event orientationfvgnh .pptx
RaedMohamed3
 
CACJapan - GROUP Presentation 1- Wk 4.pdf
CACJapan - GROUP Presentation 1- Wk 4.pdfCACJapan - GROUP Presentation 1- Wk 4.pdf
CACJapan - GROUP Presentation 1- Wk 4.pdf
camakaiclarkmusic
 
Operation Blue Star - Saka Neela Tara
Operation Blue Star   -  Saka Neela TaraOperation Blue Star   -  Saka Neela Tara
Operation Blue Star - Saka Neela Tara
Balvir Singh
 
Chapter 3 - Islamic Banking Products and Services.pptx
Chapter 3 - Islamic Banking Products and Services.pptxChapter 3 - Islamic Banking Products and Services.pptx
Chapter 3 - Islamic Banking Products and Services.pptx
Mohd Adib Abd Muin, Senior Lecturer at Universiti Utara Malaysia
 
Mule 4.6 & Java 17 Upgrade | MuleSoft Mysore Meetup #46
Mule 4.6 & Java 17 Upgrade | MuleSoft Mysore Meetup #46Mule 4.6 & Java 17 Upgrade | MuleSoft Mysore Meetup #46
Mule 4.6 & Java 17 Upgrade | MuleSoft Mysore Meetup #46
MysoreMuleSoftMeetup
 
Embracing GenAI - A Strategic Imperative
Embracing GenAI - A Strategic ImperativeEmbracing GenAI - A Strategic Imperative
Embracing GenAI - A Strategic Imperative
Peter Windle
 
Lapbook sobre os Regimes Totalitários.pdf
Lapbook sobre os Regimes Totalitários.pdfLapbook sobre os Regimes Totalitários.pdf
Lapbook sobre os Regimes Totalitários.pdf
Jean Carlos Nunes Paixão
 
Model Attribute Check Company Auto Property
Model Attribute  Check Company Auto PropertyModel Attribute  Check Company Auto Property
Model Attribute Check Company Auto Property
Celine George
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Francesca Gottschalk - How can education support child empowerment.pptx
Francesca Gottschalk - How can education support child empowerment.pptxFrancesca Gottschalk - How can education support child empowerment.pptx
Francesca Gottschalk - How can education support child empowerment.pptx
 
Acetabularia Information For Class 9 .docx
Acetabularia Information For Class 9  .docxAcetabularia Information For Class 9  .docx
Acetabularia Information For Class 9 .docx
 
Sha'Carri Richardson Presentation 202345
Sha'Carri Richardson Presentation 202345Sha'Carri Richardson Presentation 202345
Sha'Carri Richardson Presentation 202345
 
The French Revolution Class 9 Study Material pdf free download
The French Revolution Class 9 Study Material pdf free downloadThe French Revolution Class 9 Study Material pdf free download
The French Revolution Class 9 Study Material pdf free download
 
Welcome to TechSoup New Member Orientation and Q&A (May 2024).pdf
Welcome to TechSoup   New Member Orientation and Q&A (May 2024).pdfWelcome to TechSoup   New Member Orientation and Q&A (May 2024).pdf
Welcome to TechSoup New Member Orientation and Q&A (May 2024).pdf
 
Additional Benefits for Employee Website.pdf
Additional Benefits for Employee Website.pdfAdditional Benefits for Employee Website.pdf
Additional Benefits for Employee Website.pdf
 
TESDA TM1 REVIEWER FOR NATIONAL ASSESSMENT WRITTEN AND ORAL QUESTIONS WITH A...
TESDA TM1 REVIEWER  FOR NATIONAL ASSESSMENT WRITTEN AND ORAL QUESTIONS WITH A...TESDA TM1 REVIEWER  FOR NATIONAL ASSESSMENT WRITTEN AND ORAL QUESTIONS WITH A...
TESDA TM1 REVIEWER FOR NATIONAL ASSESSMENT WRITTEN AND ORAL QUESTIONS WITH A...
 
The Challenger.pdf DNHS Official Publication
The Challenger.pdf DNHS Official PublicationThe Challenger.pdf DNHS Official Publication
The Challenger.pdf DNHS Official Publication
 
1.4 modern child centered education - mahatma gandhi-2.pptx
1.4 modern child centered education - mahatma gandhi-2.pptx1.4 modern child centered education - mahatma gandhi-2.pptx
1.4 modern child centered education - mahatma gandhi-2.pptx
 
Honest Reviews of Tim Han LMA Course Program.pptx
Honest Reviews of Tim Han LMA Course Program.pptxHonest Reviews of Tim Han LMA Course Program.pptx
Honest Reviews of Tim Han LMA Course Program.pptx
 
Phrasal Verbs.XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Phrasal Verbs.XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXPhrasal Verbs.XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Phrasal Verbs.XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
 
The approach at University of Liverpool.pptx
The approach at University of Liverpool.pptxThe approach at University of Liverpool.pptx
The approach at University of Liverpool.pptx
 
Palestine last event orientationfvgnh .pptx
Palestine last event orientationfvgnh .pptxPalestine last event orientationfvgnh .pptx
Palestine last event orientationfvgnh .pptx
 
CACJapan - GROUP Presentation 1- Wk 4.pdf
CACJapan - GROUP Presentation 1- Wk 4.pdfCACJapan - GROUP Presentation 1- Wk 4.pdf
CACJapan - GROUP Presentation 1- Wk 4.pdf
 
Operation Blue Star - Saka Neela Tara
Operation Blue Star   -  Saka Neela TaraOperation Blue Star   -  Saka Neela Tara
Operation Blue Star - Saka Neela Tara
 
Chapter 3 - Islamic Banking Products and Services.pptx
Chapter 3 - Islamic Banking Products and Services.pptxChapter 3 - Islamic Banking Products and Services.pptx
Chapter 3 - Islamic Banking Products and Services.pptx
 
Mule 4.6 & Java 17 Upgrade | MuleSoft Mysore Meetup #46
Mule 4.6 & Java 17 Upgrade | MuleSoft Mysore Meetup #46Mule 4.6 & Java 17 Upgrade | MuleSoft Mysore Meetup #46
Mule 4.6 & Java 17 Upgrade | MuleSoft Mysore Meetup #46
 
Embracing GenAI - A Strategic Imperative
Embracing GenAI - A Strategic ImperativeEmbracing GenAI - A Strategic Imperative
Embracing GenAI - A Strategic Imperative
 
Lapbook sobre os Regimes Totalitários.pdf
Lapbook sobre os Regimes Totalitários.pdfLapbook sobre os Regimes Totalitários.pdf
Lapbook sobre os Regimes Totalitários.pdf
 
Model Attribute Check Company Auto Property
Model Attribute  Check Company Auto PropertyModel Attribute  Check Company Auto Property
Model Attribute Check Company Auto Property
 

Brown Vs Board Of Education

  • 1. Brown vs. board of education 1954 US Supreme Court case Lucy Eccleston Norvall
  • 2. Background: Plessy v. Ferguson After the end of the American Civil War in 1865, during the period known as Reconstruction, the government was able to provide some protection for the civil rights of the newly-freed slaves. Reconstruction abruptly ended with the Compromise of 1877 and federal troops were withdrawn, southern state governments began passing Jim Crow Laws that prohibited blacks from using the same public accommodations as whites.
  • 3. Plessy v. Ferguson (Continued) Plessy v. Ferguson, (1896), is a landmark U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the constitutionality of racial segregation under the docterine of “separate but equal“ "Separate but equal" remained standard doctrine in U.S. law until Brown Vs. Board of Education.
  • 4. Plessy vs. Ferguson In 1890, the State of Louisiana passed Act 111 that required separate accommodations for African Americans and Whites on railroads, including separate railway cars, though it specified that the accommodations must be kept "equal". Concerned, several African Americans (including Louisiana's former governer PBS Pinchback) and Whites in New Orleans formed an association, the Citizens' Committee to Test the Separate Car Act, dedicated to the repeal of that law. They raised $1412.70 ($33711.21 in 2008 USD) which they offered to the then-famous author and Radical Republican jurist, Albion W. Tourgée, to serve as lead counsel for their test case. Tourgée agreed to do it for free. Later, they enlisted Homer Plessy, who was one-eighth black, to take part in an act of planned civil disobedience. The plan was for Plessy to be thrown off the railway car and arrestedbut for violating the Separate Car Act, which could and did lead to a challenge with the high court. The Committee hired a detective to ensure that Plessy was arrested for violating the Separate Car Act, which the Citizen's Committee wanted to challenge with the goal of having it overturned. They chose Plessy because, with his light skin color, he could buy a first class train ticket and, at the same time, be arrested when he announced, while sitting on board the train, that he had an African-American ancestor. For the Committee, this was a deliberate attempt to exploit the lack of clear racial definition in either science or law so as to argue that segregation by race was an "unreasonable" use of state power. The intellectual roots of Plessy v. Ferguson were in part tied to the scientific racism of the era. However, the popular support for the decision was more likely a result of the racist beliefs held by most whites at the time.[3
  • 5. Plessy V. Ferguson (Continued) Thirteenth Amendment Section 1. Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction. Fourteenth Amendment Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the Plessy boarded a car of the East Louisiana Railroad that was designated for use by white patrons only. He was able to purchase a ticket in first class because his light skin color, but was later asked to leave the car. Plessy refused to leave and was arrested. He sued the state of LA for infringing on his rights of the 13th and 14th Amendments. privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
  • 6. Plessy vs. Ferguson (cont’d) However, the judge presiding over his case, John Ferguson, ruled that Louisiana had the right to regulate railroad companies as long as they operated within state boundaries. The Committee of Citizens took Plessy's appeal to the Supreme Court of Louisiana, which ruled with the state AGAIN. The committee appealed to the United States Supreme Court in 1896. The Supreme Court sided with LA and RACIAL SEGREGATION WAS WRITTEN INTO US LAW.
  • 7. Brown vs. Board of Education 1951 For next 90 years, “separate but equal “doctrine ruled the land. In 1951, a class action suit was filed against the Board of Education of the City of Topeka, Kansas in the U.S. District Court for the District of Kansas. The plaintiffs were thirteen Topeka parents on behalf of their twenty children.
  • 8. Brown vs. Board of Education The suit called for the school district to reverse its policy of racial segregation. Separate elementary schools were operated by the Topeka Board of Education under an 1879 Kansas law, which permitted (but did not require) districts to maintain separate elementary school facilities for black and white students in twelve communities with populations over 15,000. The plaintiffs had been recruited by the leadership of the Topeka NAACP. The named plaintiff, Oliver Brown, was a parent of Linda, a third grader, had to walk six blocks to her school bus stop to ride to Monroe Elementary, her segregated black school, which was one mile (1.6 km) away, while Sumner Elementary, a white school, was seven blocks from her house.
  • 9. Brown vs. Board of Education As directed by the NAACP leadership, the parents each attempted to enroll their children in the closest neighborhood school in the fall of 1951. They were each refused enrollment and directed to the segregated schools. Linda Brown Thompson later recalled the experience in a 2004 PBS documentary: The District Court ruled in favor of the Board of Education, citing the Plessy vs. Ferguson, (1896), which had upheld a state law requiring "separate but equal" segregated facilities for blacks and whites in railway cars The three-judge District Court panel found that segregation in public education has a detrimental effect upon negro children, but denied relief on the ground that the negro and white schools in Topeka were substantially equal with respect to buildings, transportation, curricular, and educational qualifications of teachers. The NAACP took the case to Supreme Court.
  • 10. Brown vs. Board of Education Handed down on May 17, 1954, the Court's unanimous (9-0) decision stated that "separate educational facilities are inherently unequal." As a result, de jure racial segregation was ruled a violation of the Equal Rights Amendment of the 14th Amendment of the US Constitution.