"The love of a family is life's greatest blessing."
Name: Bushra Fatima
College Name: Malla Reddy College of Education
Course: M.ed Semester 1
Subject: Advanced Educational Psychology
Paper:EDN-02
Topic: Bronfenbrenner’s Ecological Systems Theory
Roll No:2485-24-709-029
Preliminary Details
"The love of a family
is life's greatest
blessing."
Bronfenbren
ner’s
Ecological
Systems
Theory
Table Of Contents
Introduction
History
Five Ecological
Systems
Strengths
Limitations
Conclusion
"A parent’s love is whole no
matter how many times
divided."
Background On Urie
Bronfenbrenner
 Urie Bronfenbrenner was born in Moscow,
Russia, in 1917 and experienced turmoil in
his home country as a child before
immigrating to the United States at age 6.
 Witnessing the difficulties faced by children
during the unrest and rapid social change in
Russia shaped his ideas about how
environmental factors can influence child
development.
 Bronfenbrenner went on to earn a Ph.D. in
developmental psychology from the
University of Michigan in 1942.
Critique of Lab Studies
Criticized lab-based research (e.g., Mary Ainsworth’s Strange Situation, 1970)
for lacking ecological validity.
Argued that these studies failed to account for reciprocal influences between
children and their environments.
Highlighted the need to consider broader environmental forces affecting
development.
Influence of Other Theories
Built on concepts from:
• Vygotsky’s Sociocultural Theory – Emphasized the role of social interaction in
learning.
• Bandura’s Social Learning Theory – Focused on learning through observation
and modeling.
The Five Ecological
Systems
 Bronfenbrenner (1977) suggested
that the child’s environment is a
nested arrangement of structures,
each contained within the next. He
organized them in order of how
much of an impact they have on a
child.
 He named these structures the
microsystem, mesosystem,
exosystem, macrosystem and the
chronosystem.
 Because the five systems are
interrelated, the influence of one
system on a child’s development
depends on its relationship with the
others.
1. The Microsystem  The microsystem is the first level of
Bronfenbrenner’s theory and is the
things that have direct contact with the
child in their immediate environment.
 It includes the child’s most immediate
relationships and environments. For
example, a child’s parents, siblings,
classmates, teachers, and neighbors
would be part of their microsystem.
Relationships in a microsystem are bi-
directional, meaning other people can
influence the child in their environment
and change other people’s beliefs and
actions.
1.Micro System
1. The Microsystem  The interactions the child has with
these people and environments directly
impact development.
 The child is not just a passive recipient
but an active contributor in these
bidirectional interactions.
 Example: Supportive parents who read
to their child and provide educational
activities may positively influence
cognitive and language skills. Or,
children with friends who bully them at
school might develop self-esteem
issues.
1.Micro System
2. The Mesosystem
 The mesosystem is where a person’s
individual microsystems do not function
independently but are interconnected
and assert influence upon one another.
 The mesosystem involves interactions
between different microsystems in the
child’s life. These interactions can have
significant impacts on the child’s
development.
 Example: A child whose parents are
actively involved in their school life, such
as attending parent-teacher conferences
and volunteering for school events, may
perform better academically.
2. Mesosystem
 This is because the interaction
between the family
microsystem and the school
microsystem (forming the
mesosystem) creates a
supportive environment for
learning.
 Another example could be the
interaction between a child’s
peer group and family.
 If a child’s friends value
academic achievement, this
attitude might influence the
child’s behavior at home,
leading to more time spent on
homework and studying.
2. The Mesosystem
3. The Exosystem
 It incorporates other formal and
informal social structures such
as local governments, friends of
the family, and mass media.
 While not directly interacting
with the child, the exosystem
still influences the
microsystems.
 Example: A parent’s workplace
policies can significantly affect a
child’s development.
 If a company offers flexible
working hours or work-from-
home options, parents might
have more time to spend with
their children, positively
impacting the child’s emotional
 The macrosystem focuses on
how cultural elements affect a
child’s development, consisting
of cultural ideologies, attitudes,
and social conditions that
children are immersed in.
 Beliefs about gender roles,
individualism, family structures,
and social issues establish norms
and values that permeate a
child’s microsystems.
 The macrosystem differs from
the previous ecosystems as it
does not refer to the specific
environments of one developing
child but the already established
society and culture in which the
4. The Macrosystem
 The chronosystem relates to
shifts and transitions over
the child’s lifetime. These
environmental changes can
be predicted, like starting
school, or unpredicted, like
parental divorce or changing
schools when parents
relocate for work, which may
cause stress.
 Aging itself interacts with
shifting social expectations
over the lifespan within the
chronosystem.
 How children respond to
expected and unexpected life
transitions depends on the
5. The Chronosystem
 Example: The introduction of widespread
internet access and social media represents
a significant chronosystem change for many
children.
 This technological shift has altered how
children interact with peers, access
information, and spend their leisure time,
potentially affecting their social skills,
cognitive development, and even sleep
patterns.
5. The Chronosystem
Classroom
Application
 The Ecological Systems Theory has
been used to link psychological and
educational theory to early
educational curriculums and
practice.
 The developing child is at the center
of the theory, and all that occurs
within and between the five
ecological systems is done to benefit
the child in the classroom.
 According to the theory, teachers
and parents should maintain good
communication with each other and
work together to benefit the child
and strengthen the development of
the ecological systems in
educational practice.
 Teachers should also understand the
situations their students’ families may be
experiencing, including social and economic
factors that are part of the various systems.
 According to the theory, if parents and
teachers have a good relationship, this
should positively shape the child’s
development.
 Likewise, the child must be active in their
learning, both academically and socially
Limitations of the
Ecological system
Theory
 Limited Research on Mesosystems:
 Difficulty in Empirical Testing:
 Risk of Overgeneralization:
 Context-Specific Variations:
 Need to Avoid Broad Assumptions:
Conclusion
Holistic Framework
Interconnected Systems:
Valuable Insights:
Acknowledgement of Limitations:
Recognition of Individual Resilience:
Guiding Principle
References
https://www.simplypsychology.org/bronfenbr
enner.html
https://www.verywellmind.com/bronfenbren
ner-ecological-model-7643403
https://bctr.cornell.edu/about-us/urie-
bronfenbrenner
"The most important thing a
father can do for his
children is to love their
mother."
Thank You
Bushra Fatima

brofeners psychology. microsystem, mesosystem

  • 1.
    "The love ofa family is life's greatest blessing." Name: Bushra Fatima College Name: Malla Reddy College of Education Course: M.ed Semester 1 Subject: Advanced Educational Psychology Paper:EDN-02 Topic: Bronfenbrenner’s Ecological Systems Theory Roll No:2485-24-709-029 Preliminary Details
  • 2.
    "The love ofa family is life's greatest blessing." Bronfenbren ner’s Ecological Systems Theory
  • 3.
    Table Of Contents Introduction History FiveEcological Systems Strengths Limitations Conclusion
  • 4.
    "A parent’s loveis whole no matter how many times divided."
  • 5.
    Background On Urie Bronfenbrenner Urie Bronfenbrenner was born in Moscow, Russia, in 1917 and experienced turmoil in his home country as a child before immigrating to the United States at age 6.  Witnessing the difficulties faced by children during the unrest and rapid social change in Russia shaped his ideas about how environmental factors can influence child development.  Bronfenbrenner went on to earn a Ph.D. in developmental psychology from the University of Michigan in 1942.
  • 6.
    Critique of LabStudies Criticized lab-based research (e.g., Mary Ainsworth’s Strange Situation, 1970) for lacking ecological validity. Argued that these studies failed to account for reciprocal influences between children and their environments. Highlighted the need to consider broader environmental forces affecting development. Influence of Other Theories Built on concepts from: • Vygotsky’s Sociocultural Theory – Emphasized the role of social interaction in learning. • Bandura’s Social Learning Theory – Focused on learning through observation and modeling.
  • 7.
    The Five Ecological Systems Bronfenbrenner (1977) suggested that the child’s environment is a nested arrangement of structures, each contained within the next. He organized them in order of how much of an impact they have on a child.  He named these structures the microsystem, mesosystem, exosystem, macrosystem and the chronosystem.  Because the five systems are interrelated, the influence of one system on a child’s development depends on its relationship with the others.
  • 9.
    1. The Microsystem The microsystem is the first level of Bronfenbrenner’s theory and is the things that have direct contact with the child in their immediate environment.  It includes the child’s most immediate relationships and environments. For example, a child’s parents, siblings, classmates, teachers, and neighbors would be part of their microsystem. Relationships in a microsystem are bi- directional, meaning other people can influence the child in their environment and change other people’s beliefs and actions. 1.Micro System
  • 10.
    1. The Microsystem The interactions the child has with these people and environments directly impact development.  The child is not just a passive recipient but an active contributor in these bidirectional interactions.  Example: Supportive parents who read to their child and provide educational activities may positively influence cognitive and language skills. Or, children with friends who bully them at school might develop self-esteem issues. 1.Micro System
  • 11.
    2. The Mesosystem The mesosystem is where a person’s individual microsystems do not function independently but are interconnected and assert influence upon one another.  The mesosystem involves interactions between different microsystems in the child’s life. These interactions can have significant impacts on the child’s development.  Example: A child whose parents are actively involved in their school life, such as attending parent-teacher conferences and volunteering for school events, may perform better academically. 2. Mesosystem
  • 12.
     This isbecause the interaction between the family microsystem and the school microsystem (forming the mesosystem) creates a supportive environment for learning.  Another example could be the interaction between a child’s peer group and family.  If a child’s friends value academic achievement, this attitude might influence the child’s behavior at home, leading to more time spent on homework and studying. 2. The Mesosystem
  • 13.
    3. The Exosystem It incorporates other formal and informal social structures such as local governments, friends of the family, and mass media.  While not directly interacting with the child, the exosystem still influences the microsystems.  Example: A parent’s workplace policies can significantly affect a child’s development.  If a company offers flexible working hours or work-from- home options, parents might have more time to spend with their children, positively impacting the child’s emotional
  • 14.
     The macrosystemfocuses on how cultural elements affect a child’s development, consisting of cultural ideologies, attitudes, and social conditions that children are immersed in.  Beliefs about gender roles, individualism, family structures, and social issues establish norms and values that permeate a child’s microsystems.  The macrosystem differs from the previous ecosystems as it does not refer to the specific environments of one developing child but the already established society and culture in which the 4. The Macrosystem
  • 15.
     The chronosystemrelates to shifts and transitions over the child’s lifetime. These environmental changes can be predicted, like starting school, or unpredicted, like parental divorce or changing schools when parents relocate for work, which may cause stress.  Aging itself interacts with shifting social expectations over the lifespan within the chronosystem.  How children respond to expected and unexpected life transitions depends on the 5. The Chronosystem
  • 16.
     Example: Theintroduction of widespread internet access and social media represents a significant chronosystem change for many children.  This technological shift has altered how children interact with peers, access information, and spend their leisure time, potentially affecting their social skills, cognitive development, and even sleep patterns. 5. The Chronosystem
  • 17.
  • 18.
     The EcologicalSystems Theory has been used to link psychological and educational theory to early educational curriculums and practice.  The developing child is at the center of the theory, and all that occurs within and between the five ecological systems is done to benefit the child in the classroom.  According to the theory, teachers and parents should maintain good communication with each other and work together to benefit the child and strengthen the development of the ecological systems in educational practice.
  • 19.
     Teachers shouldalso understand the situations their students’ families may be experiencing, including social and economic factors that are part of the various systems.  According to the theory, if parents and teachers have a good relationship, this should positively shape the child’s development.  Likewise, the child must be active in their learning, both academically and socially
  • 20.
    Limitations of the Ecologicalsystem Theory  Limited Research on Mesosystems:  Difficulty in Empirical Testing:  Risk of Overgeneralization:  Context-Specific Variations:  Need to Avoid Broad Assumptions:
  • 21.
    Conclusion Holistic Framework Interconnected Systems: ValuableInsights: Acknowledgement of Limitations: Recognition of Individual Resilience: Guiding Principle
  • 22.
  • 23.
    "The most importantthing a father can do for his children is to love their mother." Thank You Bushra Fatima