Bloom's taxonomy is a set of three hierarchical models used to classify educational learning objectives into levels of complexity and specificity. The three lists cover the learning objectives in cognitive, affective and sensory domains(The Psychomotor Domain).
Bloom's taxonomy is a set of three hierarchical models used to classify educational learning objectives into levels of complexity and specificity. The three lists cover the learning objectives in cognitive, affective and sensory domains(The Psychomotor Domain).
This document shows how the course outcomes can be written effectively. This will act as a guide for writing good course outcome statements. It talks about the domains of learning, learning pyramid, course outcome structure, and checklist.
Blooms Taxonomy of Hierarchy of learningMaunas Thaker
Bloom's Taxonomy is a hierarchical framework used to classify educational objectives. Developed by Benjamin Bloom in the 1950s, it divides educational goals into three overarching domains: cognitive, affective, and psychomotor.
This taxonomy provides educators with a framework for designing curriculum, assessments, and instructional strategies that target different levels of cognitive complexity. It helps ensure that educational objectives are clearly defined and that instruction is appropriately aligned with the desired outcomes.
Biological screening of herbal drugs: Introduction and Need for
Phyto-Pharmacological Screening, New Strategies for evaluating
Natural Products, In vitro evaluation techniques for Antioxidants, Antimicrobial and Anticancer drugs. In vivo evaluation techniques
for Anti-inflammatory, Antiulcer, Anticancer, Wound healing, Antidiabetic, Hepatoprotective, Cardio protective, Diuretics and
Antifertility, Toxicity studies as per OECD guidelines
More Related Content
Similar to Blooms_Taxonomy_of_Learning_Domains_The.pdf
This document shows how the course outcomes can be written effectively. This will act as a guide for writing good course outcome statements. It talks about the domains of learning, learning pyramid, course outcome structure, and checklist.
Blooms Taxonomy of Hierarchy of learningMaunas Thaker
Bloom's Taxonomy is a hierarchical framework used to classify educational objectives. Developed by Benjamin Bloom in the 1950s, it divides educational goals into three overarching domains: cognitive, affective, and psychomotor.
This taxonomy provides educators with a framework for designing curriculum, assessments, and instructional strategies that target different levels of cognitive complexity. It helps ensure that educational objectives are clearly defined and that instruction is appropriately aligned with the desired outcomes.
Biological screening of herbal drugs: Introduction and Need for
Phyto-Pharmacological Screening, New Strategies for evaluating
Natural Products, In vitro evaluation techniques for Antioxidants, Antimicrobial and Anticancer drugs. In vivo evaluation techniques
for Anti-inflammatory, Antiulcer, Anticancer, Wound healing, Antidiabetic, Hepatoprotective, Cardio protective, Diuretics and
Antifertility, Toxicity studies as per OECD guidelines
Safalta Digital marketing institute in Noida, provide complete applications that encompass a huge range of virtual advertising and marketing additives, which includes search engine optimization, virtual communication advertising, pay-per-click on marketing, content material advertising, internet analytics, and greater. These university courses are designed for students who possess a comprehensive understanding of virtual marketing strategies and attributes.Safalta Digital Marketing Institute in Noida is a first choice for young individuals or students who are looking to start their careers in the field of digital advertising. The institute gives specialized courses designed and certification.
for beginners, providing thorough training in areas such as SEO, digital communication marketing, and PPC training in Noida. After finishing the program, students receive the certifications recognised by top different universitie, setting a strong foundation for a successful career in digital marketing.
Unit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdfThiyagu K
This slides describes the basic concepts of ICT, basics of Email, Emerging Technology and Digital Initiatives in Education. This presentations aligns with the UGC Paper I syllabus.
Embracing GenAI - A Strategic ImperativePeter Windle
Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies such as Generative AI, Image Generators and Large Language Models have had a dramatic impact on teaching, learning and assessment over the past 18 months. The most immediate threat AI posed was to Academic Integrity with Higher Education Institutes (HEIs) focusing their efforts on combating the use of GenAI in assessment. Guidelines were developed for staff and students, policies put in place too. Innovative educators have forged paths in the use of Generative AI for teaching, learning and assessments leading to pockets of transformation springing up across HEIs, often with little or no top-down guidance, support or direction.
This Gasta posits a strategic approach to integrating AI into HEIs to prepare staff, students and the curriculum for an evolving world and workplace. We will highlight the advantages of working with these technologies beyond the realm of teaching, learning and assessment by considering prompt engineering skills, industry impact, curriculum changes, and the need for staff upskilling. In contrast, not engaging strategically with Generative AI poses risks, including falling behind peers, missed opportunities and failing to ensure our graduates remain employable. The rapid evolution of AI technologies necessitates a proactive and strategic approach if we are to remain relevant.
Model Attribute Check Company Auto PropertyCeline George
In Odoo, the multi-company feature allows you to manage multiple companies within a single Odoo database instance. Each company can have its own configurations while still sharing common resources such as products, customers, and suppliers.
June 3, 2024 Anti-Semitism Letter Sent to MIT President Kornbluth and MIT Cor...Levi Shapiro
Letter from the Congress of the United States regarding Anti-Semitism sent June 3rd to MIT President Sally Kornbluth, MIT Corp Chair, Mark Gorenberg
Dear Dr. Kornbluth and Mr. Gorenberg,
The US House of Representatives is deeply concerned by ongoing and pervasive acts of antisemitic
harassment and intimidation at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). Failing to act decisively to ensure a safe learning environment for all students would be a grave dereliction of your responsibilities as President of MIT and Chair of the MIT Corporation.
This Congress will not stand idly by and allow an environment hostile to Jewish students to persist. The House believes that your institution is in violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, and the inability or
unwillingness to rectify this violation through action requires accountability.
Postsecondary education is a unique opportunity for students to learn and have their ideas and beliefs challenged. However, universities receiving hundreds of millions of federal funds annually have denied
students that opportunity and have been hijacked to become venues for the promotion of terrorism, antisemitic harassment and intimidation, unlawful encampments, and in some cases, assaults and riots.
The House of Representatives will not countenance the use of federal funds to indoctrinate students into hateful, antisemitic, anti-American supporters of terrorism. Investigations into campus antisemitism by the Committee on Education and the Workforce and the Committee on Ways and Means have been expanded into a Congress-wide probe across all relevant jurisdictions to address this national crisis. The undersigned Committees will conduct oversight into the use of federal funds at MIT and its learning environment under authorities granted to each Committee.
• The Committee on Education and the Workforce has been investigating your institution since December 7, 2023. The Committee has broad jurisdiction over postsecondary education, including its compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, campus safety concerns over disruptions to the learning environment, and the awarding of federal student aid under the Higher Education Act.
• The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is investigating the sources of funding and other support flowing to groups espousing pro-Hamas propaganda and engaged in antisemitic harassment and intimidation of students. The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is the principal oversight committee of the US House of Representatives and has broad authority to investigate “any matter” at “any time” under House Rule X.
• The Committee on Ways and Means has been investigating several universities since November 15, 2023, when the Committee held a hearing entitled From Ivory Towers to Dark Corners: Investigating the Nexus Between Antisemitism, Tax-Exempt Universities, and Terror Financing. The Committee followed the hearing with letters to those institutions on January 10, 202
Francesca Gottschalk - How can education support child empowerment.pptxEduSkills OECD
Francesca Gottschalk from the OECD’s Centre for Educational Research and Innovation presents at the Ask an Expert Webinar: How can education support child empowerment?
Welcome to TechSoup New Member Orientation and Q&A (May 2024).pdfTechSoup
In this webinar you will learn how your organization can access TechSoup's wide variety of product discount and donation programs. From hardware to software, we'll give you a tour of the tools available to help your nonprofit with productivity, collaboration, financial management, donor tracking, security, and more.
Welcome to TechSoup New Member Orientation and Q&A (May 2024).pdf
Blooms_Taxonomy_of_Learning_Domains_The.pdf
1. Bloom's Taxonomy of Learning Domains
Bloom's Taxonomy was created in 1956 under the leadership of educational psychologist Dr Benjamin Bloom in order to promote higher forms
of thinking in education, such as analyzing and evaluating, rather than just remembering facts (rote learning).
The Three Types of Learning
The committee identified three domains of educational activities or learning (Bloom, 1956):
Cognitive: mental skills (Knowledge)
Affective: growth in feelings or emotional areas (Attitude or self)
Psychomotor: manual or physical skills (Skills)
Since the work was produced by higher education, the words tend to be a little bigger than we normally use. Domains can be thought of as
categories. Trainers often refer to these three categories as KSA (Knowledge, Skills, and Attitude). This taxonomy of learning behaviors can be
thought of as “the goals of the learning process.” That is, after a learning episode, the learner should have acquired new skills, knowledge, and/or
attitudes.
This compilation divides the three domains into subdivisions, starting from the simplest behavior to the most complex. The divisions outlined are
not absolutes and there are other systems or hierarchies that have been devised in the educational and training world. However, Bloom's
taxonomy is easily understood and is probably the most widely applied one in use today.
Cognitive Domain
The cognitive domain involves knowledge and the development of intellectual skills (Bloom, 1956). This includes the recall or recognition of
specific facts, procedural patterns, and concepts that serve in the development of intellectual abilities and skills. There are six major categories,
which are listed in order below, starting from the simplest behavior to the most complex. The categories can be thought of as degrees of
difficulties. That is, the first ones must normally be mastered before the next ones can take place.
Bloom's Revised Taxonomy
Lorin Anderson, a former student of Bloom, revisited the cognitive domain in the learning taxonomy in the mid-nineties and made some changes,
with perhaps the two most prominent ones being, 1) changing the names in the six categories from noun to verb forms, and 2) slightly
rearranging them (Anderson, Krathwohl, Airasian, Cruikshank, Mayer, Pintrich, Raths, Wittrock, 2000; Pohl, 2000).
This new taxonomy reflects a more active form of thinking and is perhaps more accurate:
2. Table of The Revised Cognitive Domain
Category Example and Key Words (verbs)
Remembering: Recall previous learned
information.
Examples: Recite a policy. Quote prices from memory to a customer. Knows the safety
rules. Repeats what it was said in the classroom. Describes what one saw before. Repeat
what one read before.
Key Words: defines, describes, identifies, knows, labels, lists, matches, names,
outlines, recalls, recognizes, reproduces, selects, states.
Understanding: Comprehending the meaning,
translation, interpolation, and interpretation of
instructions and problems. State a problem in
one's own words.
Examples: Rewrites the principles of test writing. Explain in one's own words the steps
for performing a complex task. Translates an equation into a computer spreadsheet.
Explains what is wrong and right in his or her own life. Generalize appropriate habits in
learning settings. Comprehend own strength and weaknesses in his or her own learning.
Key Words: comprehends, converts, defends, distinguishes, estimates, explains,
extends, generalizes, gives an example, infers, interprets, paraphrases, predicts,
rewrites, summarizes, translates.
Applying: Use a concept in a new situation or Examples: Use a manual to calculate an employee's vacation time. Apply laws of
3. unprompted use of an abstraction. Applies what
was learned in the classroom into novel situations
in the work place or personal life.
statistics to evaluate the reliability of a written test. Make decisions based on
objectiveness. Constructs a routine to develop appropriate habits. Shows positive
attitudes to actions. Modifies his or her behavior in different ways: home, university,
friends, strangers, etc.
Key Words: applies, changes, computes, constructs, demonstrates, discovers,
manipulates, modifies, operates, predicts, prepares, produces, relates, shows, solves,
uses.
Analyzing: Separates material or concepts into
component parts so that its organizational
structure may be understood. Distinguishes
between facts and inferences.
Examples: figure out how to work a piece of equipment by using logical deduction.
Recognize logical fallacies in reasoning. Gathers information from a department and
selects the required tasks for training. Contrast different types of human behavior.
Deconstruct from simple to complex concepts to deeply understand. Discriminate types
of reading texts. Separate relevant from irrelevant information.
Key Words: analyzes, breaks down, compares, contrasts, diagrams, deconstructs,
differentiates, discriminates, distinguishes, identifies, illustrates, infers, outlines, relates,
selects, separates.
Evaluating: Make judgments about the value of
ideas or materials.
Examples: Select the most effective solution. Hire the most qualified candidate.
Explain and justify a new budget. Explain why one thinks in one way or another. Justify
why information is relevant or not. Summarize texts and opinions.
Key Words: appraises, compares, concludes, contrasts, criticizes, critiques, defends,
describes, discriminates, evaluates, explains, interprets, justifies, relates, summarizes,
supports.
Creating: Builds a structure or pattern from
diverse elements. Put parts together to form a
whole, with emphasis on creating a new meaning
or structure.
Examples: Write a company operations or process manual. Design a machine to
perform a specific task. Integrates training from several sources to solve a problem.
Revises and process to improve the results. Generate a research study. Designs a new
way to teach, to learn. Plan one´s own life. Restructure something already done.
Key Words: categorizes, combines, compiles, composes, creates, devises, designs,
explains, generates, modifies, organizes, plans, rearranges, reconstructs, relates,
reorganizes, revises, rewrites, summarizes, tells, writes.
4. Affective Domain
The affective domain (Krathwohl, Bloom, Masia, 1973) includes the
manner in which we deal with things emotionally, such as feelings, values,
appreciation, enthusiasms, motivations, and attitudes. The five major
categories are listed from the simplest behavior to the most complex:
Category Example and Key Words (verbs)
Receiving Phenomena:
Awareness, willingness to hear,
selected attention.
Examples: Listen to others with respect. Listen for
and remember the name of newly introduced people.
Key Words: asks, chooses, describes, follows, gives,
holds, identifies, locates, names, points to, selects,
sits, erects, replies, uses.
Responding to Phenomena: Examples: Participates in class discussions. Gives a
5. Active participation on the part
of the learners. Attends and
reacts to a particular
phenomenon. Learning
outcomes may emphasize
compliance in responding,
willingness to respond, or
satisfaction in responding
(motivation).
presentation. Questions new ideas, concepts, models,
etc. in order to fully understand them. Know the
safety rules and practices them.
Key Words: answers, assists, aids, complies, conf
orms, discusses, greets, helps, labels, performs,
practices, presents, reads, recites, reports, selects,
tells, writes.
Valuing: The worth or value a
person attaches to a particular
object, phenomenon, or
behavior. This ranges from
simple acceptance to the more
complex state of
commitment. Valuing is based
on the internalization of a set of
specified values, while clues to
these values are expressed in
the learner's overt behavior and
are often identifiable.
Examples: Demonstrates belief in the democratic
process. Is sensitive towards individual and cultural
differences (value diversity). Shows the ability to
solve problems. Proposes a plan to social
improvement and follows through with commitment.
Informs management on matters that one feels
strongly about.
Key Words: completes, demonstrates, differentiates,
explains, follows, forms, initiates, invites, joins,
justifies, proposes, reads, reports, selects, shares,
studies, works.
6. Organization: Organizes
values into priorities by
contrasting different values,
resolving conflicts between
them, and creating a unique
value system. The emphasis is
on comparing, relating, and
synthesizing values.
Examples: Recognizes the need for balance between
freedom and responsible behavior. Accepts
responsibility for one's behavior. Explains the role of
systematic planning in solving problems. Accepts
professional ethical standards. Creates a life plan in
harmony with abilities, interests, and beliefs.
Prioritizes time effectively to meet the needs of the
organization, family, and self.
Key Words: adh
eres, alters, arranges, combines, compares,
completes, defends, explains, formulates,
generalizes, identifies, integrates, modifies, orders,
organizes, prepares, relates, synthesizes.
Internalizing values
(characterization): Has a value
system that controls their
behavior. The behavior is
pervasive, consistent,
predictable, and most
importantly, characteristic of
Examples: Shows self-reliance when working
independently. Cooperates in group
activities (displays teamwork). Uses an objective
approach in problem solving. Displays a professional
commitment to ethical practice on a daily basis.
Revises judgments and changes behavior in light of
new evidence. Values people for what they are, not
7. the learner. Instructional
objectives are concerned with
the student's general patterns of
adjustment (personal, social,
emotional).
how they look.
Key Words: acts, discriminates, displays,
influences, listens, modifies, performs, practices,
proposes, qualifies, questions, revises, serves, solves,
verifies.
Psychomotor Domain
The psychomotor domain (Simpson, 1972) includes physical movement, coordination, and use of the motor-skill areas. Development of these
skills requires practice and is measured in terms of speed, precision, distance, procedures, or techniques in execution. The seven major categories
are listed from the simplest behavior to the most complex:
Category Example and Key Words (verbs)
Perception (awareness):
The ability to use sensory
cues to guide motor
activity. This ranges from
sensory stimulation, through
cue selection, to translation.
Examples: Detects non-verbal communication cues. Estimate
where a ball will land after it is thrown and then moving to the
correct location to catch the ball. Adjusts heat of stove to
correct temperature by smell and taste of food. Adjusts the
height of the forks on a forklift by comparing where the forks
are in relation to the pallet.
Key Words: chooses, describes, detects, differentiates,
distinguishes, identifies, isolates, relates, selects.
Set: Readiness to act. It Examples: Knows and acts upon a sequence of steps in a
8. includes mental, physical,
and emotional sets. These
three sets are dispositions
that predetermine a person's
response to different
situations (sometimes called
mindsets).
manufacturing process. Recognize one's abilities and
limitations. Shows desire to learn a new process (motivation).
NOTE: This subdivision of Psychomotor is closely related
with the “Responding to phenomena” subdivision of the
Affective domain.
Key Words: begins, displays, explains, moves, proceeds,
reacts, shows, states, volunteers.
Guided Response: The
early stages in learning a
complex skill that includes
imitation and trial and error.
Adequacy of performance is
achieved by practicing.
Examples: Performs a mathematical equation as
demonstrated. Follows instructions to build a model.
Responds hand-signals of instructor while learning to operate
a forklift.
Key Words: copies, traces, follows, react, reproduce,
responds
Mechanism (basic
proficiency): This is the
intermediate stage in
learning a complex
skill. Learned responses
have become habitual and
the movements can be
performed with some
Examples: Use a personal computer. Repair a leaking faucet.
Drive a car.
Key Words: assembles, calibrates, constructs, dismantles,
displays, fastens, fixes, grinds, heats, manipulates, measures,
mends, mixes, organizes, sketches.
9. confidence and proficiency.
Complex Overt Response
(Expert): The skillful
performance of motor acts
that involve complex
movement
patterns. Proficiency is
indicated by a quick,
accurate, and highly
coordinated performance,
requiring a minimum of
energy. This category
includes performing without
hesitation, and automatic
performance. For example,
players are often utter
sounds of satisfaction or
expletives as soon as they hit
a tennis ball or throw a
football, because they can
tell by the feel of the act
what the result will produce.
Examples: Maneuvers a car into a tight parallel parking spot.
Operates a computer quickly and accurately. Displays
competence while playing the piano.
Key Words: assembles, builds, calibrates, constructs,
dismantles, displays, fastens, fixes, grinds, heats, manipulates,
measures, mends, mixes, organizes, sketches.
NOTE: The Key Words are the same as Mechanism, but will
have adverbs or adjectives that indicate that the performance
is quicker, better, more accurate, etc.
10. Adaptation: Skills are well
developed and the individual
can modify movement
patterns to fit special
requirements.
Examples: Responds effectively to unexpected
experiences. Modifies instruction to meet the needs of the
learners. Perform a task with a machine that it was not
originally intended to do (machine is not damaged and there is
no danger in performing the new task).
Key Words: adapts, alters, changes, rearranges, reorganizes,
revises, varies.
Origination: Creating new
movement patterns to fit a
particular situation or
specific problem. Learning
outcomes emphasize
creativity based upon highly
developed skills.
Examples: Constructs a new theory. Develops a new and
comprehensive training programming. Creates a new
gymnastic routine.
Key Words: arranges, builds, combines, composes,
constructs, creates, designs, initiate, makes, originates.
References
Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R., Airasian, P. W., Cruikshank, K. A., Mayer, R. E., Pintrich, P. R., Raths, J., Wittrock, M. C. (2000). A
Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. New York: Pearson, Allyn &
Bacon.
Biggs, J. B. and Collis, K. (1982). Evaluating the Quality of Learning: the SOLO taxonomy. New York, Academic Press
Bloom B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, Handbook I: The Cognitive Domain. New York: David McKay Co Inc.
Dave, R. H. (1975). Developing and Writing Behavioral Objectives. (R. J. Armstrong, ed.). Tucson, Arizona: Educational Innovators Press.
Harrow, A. (1972) ATaxonomy of Psychomotor Domain: AGuide for Developing Behavioral Objectives. New York: David McKay.
11. Krathwohl, D. R., Bloom, B. S., & Masia, B. B. (1973). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, the Classification of Educational Goals.
Handbook II: Affective Domain. New York: David McKay Co., Inc.
Pohl, M. (2000). Learning to Think, Thinking to Learn: Models and Strategies to Develop a Classroom Culture of Thinking. Cheltenham, Vic.:
Hawker Brownlow.
Simpson E. J. (1972). The Classification of Educational Objectives in the Psychomotor Domain. Washington, DC: Gryphon House.
Questions to answer individually:
1. How many domains are there in knowledge and what are their names?
2. What are the levels of knowledge from low to high order thinking?
3. How many categories are there in the “affective domain”? Mention them:
4. How many categories are there in the psychomotor domain? Mention them:
5. Conceptualize each domain:
6. How important is each domain in “research”?
7. In which domain do you deal with “induction, deduction, reflecting, abstracting, concreting” Why?
8. How important is “to receive the phenomena category” in the affective domain for you to learn new things?
9. Whenever we involve in learning something new, there is a need to put into practice the domains. Can you suggest an activity in which
the domains are put into practice? Describe it:
10. From your point of view, which domain do you think is important to develop?