2
Absolute Error
Given anapproximation a of a correct value x, we define
the absolute value of the difference between the two
values to be the absolute error. We will represent the
absolute error by Eabs,
Relative Error
Thus, we define the relative error to be the ratio between the
absolute error and the absolute value of the correct value
and denote it by Erel:
4
H.W
Calculate Relative Errorof:
Where N is the count rate of the sample, B is the background count
rate, t is the counting time (s), is the probability of gamma decay
(%), f is detector efficiency (%), m is the mass (kg) of the sediment
sample.
5.
5
Basis of BisectionMethod
Theorem
x
f(x)
xu
x
An equation f(x)=0, where f(x) is a real continuous
function, has at least one root between xl and xu if f(xl) f(xu)
< 0.
Figure 1 At least one root exists between the two points if the function
is real, continuous, and changes sign.
6.
x
f(x)
xu
x
6
Basis of BisectionMethod
Figure 2 If function does not change sign between two points,
roots of the equation may still exist between the two points.
x
f
0
x
f
7.
x
f(x)
xu
x
7
Basis of BisectionMethod
Figure 3 If the function does not change sign between two
points, there may not be any roots for the equation between
the two points.
x
f(x)
xu
x
x
f
0
x
f
8.
x
f(x)
xu
x
8
Basis of BisectionMethod
Figure 4 If the function changes sign between two points,
more than one root for the equation may exist between the
two points.
x
f
0
x
f
11
Step 1
Choose xl
andxu
as two guesses for the root such
that f(xl
) f(xu
) < 0, or in other words, f(x) changes sign
between xl
and xu
. This was demonstrated in Figure
1.
x
f(x)
xu
x
Figure 1
13
Step 3
Now checkthe following
a) If , then the root lies between xl
and xm
;
then xl
= xl
; xu
= xm
.
b) If , then the root lies between xm
and
xu
; then xl
= xm
; xu
= xu
.
c) If ; then the root is xm.
Stop the
algorithm if this is true.
0
m
l x
f
x
f
0
m
l x
f
x
f
0
m
l x
f
x
f
14.
14
Step 4
x
x
m =
xu
2
100
new
m
old
m
new
a
x
x
xm
root
of
estimate
current
new
m
x
root
of
estimate
previous
old
m
x
Find the new estimate of the root
Find the absolute relative approximate error
where
15.
15
Step 5
Is ?
Yes
No
Goto Step 2 using
new upper and lower
guesses.
Stop the algorithm
Compare the absolute relative approximate error
with the pre-specified error tolerance .
a
s
s
a
Note one should also check whether the number of
iterations is more than the maximum number of
iterations allowed. If so, one needs to terminate the
algorithm and notify the user about it.
17
Example 1
You areworking for ‘DOWN THE TOILET COMPANY’
that makes floats for ABC commodes. The floating
ball has a specific gravity of 0.6 and has a radius of
5.5 cm. You are asked to find the depth to which the
ball is submerged when floating in water.
Figure 6 Diagram of the floating ball
18.
18
Example 1 Cont.
Theequation that gives the depth x to which the ball
is submerged under water is given by
a) Use the bisection method of finding roots of
equations to find the depth x to which the ball is
submerged under water. Conduct three iterations to
estimate the root of the above equation.
b) Find the absolute relative approximate error at the
end of each iteration, and the number of significant
digits at least correct at the end of each iteration.
0
10
993
.
3
165
.
0 4
2
3
x
x
19.
19
Example 1 Cont.
Fromthe physics of the problem, the ball would be
submerged between x = 0 and x = 2R,
where R = radius of the ball,
that is
11
.
0
0
055
.
0
2
0
2
0
x
x
R
x
Figure 6 Diagram of the floating ball
20.
To aid inthe
understanding of how this
method works to find the
root of an equation, the
graph of f(x) is shown to
the right,
where
20
Example 1 Cont.
0
10
4.2
03
.0 6
2
3
x
x
x
x
f
4
2
3
10
993
3
165
0 -
.
x
.
x
x
f
Figure 7 Graph of the function f(x)
Solution
21.
21
Example 1 Cont.
Letus assume
11
.
0
00
.
0
u
x
x
Check if the function changes sign between xl
and
xu .
4
4
2
3
4
4
2
3
10
662
.
2
10
993
.
3
11
.
0
165
.
0
11
.
0
11
.
0
10
993
.
3
10
993
.
3
0
165
.
0
0
0
f
x
f
f
x
f
u
l
Hence
0
10
662
.
2
10
993
.
3
11
.
0
0 4
4
f
f
x
f
x
f u
l
So there is at least on root between xl
and xu,
that is between 0 and
0.11
23
Example 1 Cont.
055
.
0
2
11
.
0
0
2
u
m
x
x
x
0
10
655
.
6
10
993
.
3
055
.
0
0
10
655
.
6
10
993
.
3
055
.
0
165
.
0
055
.
0
055
.
0
5
4
5
4
2
3
f
f
x
f
x
f
f
x
f
m
l
m
Iteration 1
The estimate of the root is
Hence the root is bracketed between xm
and xu
, that is, between
0.055 and 0.11. So, the lower and upper limits of the new bracket
are
At this point, the absolute relative approximate error cannot be
calculated as we do not have a previous approximation.
11
.
0
,
055
.
0
u
l x
x
a
25
Example 1 Cont.
0825
.
0
2
11
.
0
055
.
0
2
u
m
x
x
x
0
10
655
.
6
10
622
.
1
)
0825
.
0
(
055
.
0
10
622
.
1
10
993
.
3
0825
.
0
165
.
0
0825
.
0
0825
.
0
5
4
4
4
2
3
f
f
x
f
x
f
f
x
f
m
l
m
Iteration 2
The estimate of the root is
Hence the root is bracketed between xl
and xm
, that is, between
0.055 and 0.0825. So, the lower and upper limits of the new bracket
are 0825
.
0
,
055
.
0
u
l x
x
27
Example 1 Cont.
Theabsolute relative approximate error at the end of Iteration 2 is
a
%
333
.
33
100
0825
.
0
055
.
0
0825
.
0
100
new
m
old
m
new
m
a
x
x
x
None of the significant digits are at least correct in the estimate root
of xm = 0.0825 because the absolute relative approximate error is
greater than 5%.
28.
28
Example 1 Cont.
06875
.
0
2
0825
.
0
055
.
0
2
u
m
x
x
x
0
10
563
.
5
10
655
.
6
06875
.
0
055
.
0
10
563
.
5
10
993
.
3
06875
.
0
165
.
0
06875
.
0
06875
.
0
5
5
5
4
2
3
f
f
x
f
x
f
f
x
f
m
l
m
Iteration 3
The estimate of the root is
Hence the root is bracketed between xl
and xm
, that is, between
0.055 and 0.06875. So, the lower and upper limits of the new
bracket are 06875
.
0
,
055
.
0
u
l x
x
30
Example 1 Cont.
Theabsolute relative approximate error at the end of Iteration 3 is
a
%
20
100
06875
.
0
0825
.
0
06875
.
0
100
new
m
old
m
new
m
a
x
x
x
Still none of the significant digits are at least correct in the
estimated root of the equation as the absolute relative approximate
error is greater than 5%.
Seven more iterations were conducted and these iterations are
shown in Table 1.
32
Table 1 Cont.
Hencethe number of significant digits at least correct is given by
the largest value or m for which
463
.
2
3442
.
0
log
2
2
3442
.
0
log
10
3442
.
0
10
5
.
0
1721
.
0
10
5
.
0
2
2
2
m
m
m
m
m
a
2
m
So
The number of significant digits at least correct in the estimated
root of 0.06241 at the end of the 10th
iteration is 2.
35
Drawbacks (continued)
Ifa function f(x) is such that it just
touches the x-axis it will be unable to
find the lower and upper guesses.
f(x)
x
2
x
x
f