The addition of enzymatic feed additives to dairy cow diets can increase feed intake, animal performance, and profitability. Fiber-degrading enzymes enhance dry matter and fiber digestibility, improving feed efficiency. When added to forages and concentrates, these enzymes can increase intake by 2.4-7 lbs/day and milk yield by 2.2-2.4 lbs/day on average. Specifically, a blend of cellulase and xylanase increased income over feed costs per cow from $0.32 to $0.88 daily. While responses vary depending on diet, stage of lactation, and enzyme type, fiber-degrading enzymes generally aid digestion and utilization of feedstuffs in r
Zoo-technical performances of weaner rabbits fed Nutryzyme® supplemented dietsAI Publications
The study assessed the zoo-technical performances of weaner rabbits fed Nutrizyme supplement diets. This study aimed at determining the zoo-technical performances of the weaner rabbits fed Nutrizyme supplement diets while we specifically determined the zoo-technical performances, the apparent nutrient digestibility as well as the hematological and serum Biochemical of weaner rabbits fed Nutrizyme supplement diets. Eighteen rabbits were allotted into three dietary treatments with each having three replicates in a completely randomized design format. Each replicate (unit) housed two rabbits. The Nutrizyme powder was incorporated in the diets at 0, 125, and 250 ppm respectively. The parameters appraised include average daily feed intake, feed efficiency, average final weight and the heamatological and serum profiles. All data generated were subjected to analysis of variance using statistical packages for social sciences (SSPM) packages. There were significant (p<0.05) differences in the total weight, average daily weight, average daily feed intake as well as the feed efficiency. Rabbits fed diets 3 (250mg/kg Nutrizyme inclusion) had the best result in terms of the total weight (1068g), average daily (0.25), respectively. There were significant (p<0.05) differences in the digestibility of nutrients among the rabbits as indicated in the results. The crude protein digestibility improved with increased enzyme inclusion in the diets. Rabbits fed the control diet had the least nutrient digestibility. The heamoglobin concentrations, white blood cells and serum metabolites were not significantly influenced (p<0.05) by dietary treatments. The packed cell volumes (PCV) of 36.03 to 41.06% were within the normal values of 35 to 45%, also red blood cell counts and the mean cell heamoglobin concentration (MCHC), were within the range reported for rabbits. Enzyme was found to be good nutrient metabolite that could enhance the growth of weaned rabbits. The already established quantity (125g/ton of feed) should be maintain as either increase or decrease in the internationally recommended quantity did not significantly (p<0.05) affect the zoo-technical performances nutrient digestibility, heamatological and serum metabolites of weaner rabbits.
Zoo-technical performances of weaner rabbits fed Nutryzyme® supplemented dietsAI Publications
The study assessed the zoo-technical performances of weaner rabbits fed Nutrizyme supplement diets. This study aimed at determining the zoo-technical performances of the weaner rabbits fed Nutrizyme supplement diets while we specifically determined the zoo-technical performances, the apparent nutrient digestibility as well as the hematological and serum Biochemical of weaner rabbits fed Nutrizyme supplement diets. Eighteen rabbits were allotted into three dietary treatments with each having three replicates in a completely randomized design format. Each replicate (unit) housed two rabbits. The Nutrizyme powder was incorporated in the diets at 0, 125, and 250 ppm respectively. The parameters appraised include average daily feed intake, feed efficiency, average final weight and the heamatological and serum profiles. All data generated were subjected to analysis of variance using statistical packages for social sciences (SSPM) packages. There were significant (p<0.05) differences in the total weight, average daily weight, average daily feed intake as well as the feed efficiency. Rabbits fed diets 3 (250mg/kg Nutrizyme inclusion) had the best result in terms of the total weight (1068g), average daily (0.25), respectively. There were significant (p<0.05) differences in the digestibility of nutrients among the rabbits as indicated in the results. The crude protein digestibility improved with increased enzyme inclusion in the diets. Rabbits fed the control diet had the least nutrient digestibility. The heamoglobin concentrations, white blood cells and serum metabolites were not significantly influenced (p<0.05) by dietary treatments. The packed cell volumes (PCV) of 36.03 to 41.06% were within the normal values of 35 to 45%, also red blood cell counts and the mean cell heamoglobin concentration (MCHC), were within the range reported for rabbits. Enzyme was found to be good nutrient metabolite that could enhance the growth of weaned rabbits. The already established quantity (125g/ton of feed) should be maintain as either increase or decrease in the internationally recommended quantity did not significantly (p<0.05) affect the zoo-technical performances nutrient digestibility, heamatological and serum metabolites of weaner rabbits.
Application of digestibility values in poultry and bioassay and analytical procedures using poultry
Sri Venkateswara veterinary university
Animal nutrition
Vishnu Vardhan Reddy
Effects of mannanase and distillers dried grain with solubles on growth perfo...Pig Farm Solution
Effects of mannanase and distillers dried grain with solubles on growth performance nutrient digestibility, and carcass characteristics of grower-finisher pigs S. Y. Yoon, Y. X. Yang, P. L. Shinde, J. Y. Choi, J. S. Kim, Y. W. Kim, K. Yun, J. K. Jo, J.
H. Lee, S. J. Ohh, I. K. Kwon and B. J. Chae J Anim Sci
published online Sep 11, 2009
Not only has gentics and nutrition played a major role in maximizing milk production, but farm management, labor, and facilities all play a role as well. Jaylor's Ruminant Nutritionist, Janet Kleinschmidt, discusses how.
EVALUATION OF FEED FOR ENERGY FOR RUMINANTS AND NON-RUMINANTS
Dr. Abhishek Sharma
Evaluation of feeds is concerned with the assessment of the quantities in which nutrients are supplied by feeds as well as the assessment of the quantities in which they are required by different classes of farm animals.
The major organic nutrients i.e. energy and protein are required by animals as materials for the construction of body tissues, the synthesis of milk and eggs and for work production. A unifying feature of these diverse functions is that they all involve a transfer of energy from chemical energy to heat energy (when nutrients are oxidized) or when chemical energy is converted from one form to another (when body fat is synthesized from carbohydrate). The ability of a feed to supply energy is therefore of great importance in determining its nutritive value
EVALUATION OF FEED FOR ENERGY
FORM OF ENERGY-
The original source of energy, the sun, or solar energy is stored in plants in the form of carbohydrates, lipids and protein through photosynthesis. This stored chemical energy becomes available to man and animals.
Definition of Energy-
Energy is defined as the capacity to do work. As we know, heat is measurement in some units know as calories.
According to the first law of thermodynamics all forms of energy can be quantitatively converted into heat energy. It is convenient to express heat energy in the body as heat units.
Basic Terms
Calorie (cal): A calorie is the amount of heat required to raise the temperature of one gram of water to 10C ( from 14.5°C to 15.5°C).
*1 Cal= 4.184 Joule
* 1 joule = 0.239 calories
Kilo calorie (Kcal): A kilo calorie is the heat required to raise temperature of 1 kg of water by 1°C. A kilo calorie is equal to 1000 calories.
Mega calorie (Mcal): A mega calorie is equivalent to 1000 Kcal or Therm. But Mcal is the preferred term.
British Thermal Unit (BTU): A BTU is the amount of heat required to raise 1 lb of water by 1°F. One kilo calorie approximately equals 4 BTU.
1 Kilo Calories= 4 BTU
1 Kilo Calories = 4.184 KJ
1 KJ = 0.239 KCal
Method for measuring the value of any feed is to determine the amount of digestible nutrients that is supplied to the animals following systems are used.
Gross energy (GE)
Digestible energy (DE)
Metabolizable energy (ME)
Net energy (NE)
Total digestible nutrient (TDN)
Starch equivalent (SE)
Scandinavian feed unit
Physiological fuel value (PFV)
Nutritive ratio (NR)
Palatants are often used in feed for their ability to confer an attractive smell and taste to feed, with the aim of stimulating intake. The important role of feed palatability in livestock animals, and particularly in some ruminants, is reflected in their sensitivity to the smell and taste of feed, which influences their feeding behaviour.
Austin Journal of Veterinary Science & Animal Husbandry is an open access, peer reviewed, scholarly journal dedicated to publish articles in all areas of Veterinary Science.
The aim of the journal is to provide a forum for researchers, physicians, academicians and other Veterinary professionals to find most recent advances in the areas of diagnosis and treatments in Veterinary sciences.
Austin Journal of Veterinary Science & Animal Husbandry accepts original research articles, review articles, case reports, clinical images and rapid communication on all the aspects of Veterinary Science.
Application of digestibility values in poultry and bioassay and analytical procedures using poultry
Sri Venkateswara veterinary university
Animal nutrition
Vishnu Vardhan Reddy
Effects of mannanase and distillers dried grain with solubles on growth perfo...Pig Farm Solution
Effects of mannanase and distillers dried grain with solubles on growth performance nutrient digestibility, and carcass characteristics of grower-finisher pigs S. Y. Yoon, Y. X. Yang, P. L. Shinde, J. Y. Choi, J. S. Kim, Y. W. Kim, K. Yun, J. K. Jo, J.
H. Lee, S. J. Ohh, I. K. Kwon and B. J. Chae J Anim Sci
published online Sep 11, 2009
Not only has gentics and nutrition played a major role in maximizing milk production, but farm management, labor, and facilities all play a role as well. Jaylor's Ruminant Nutritionist, Janet Kleinschmidt, discusses how.
EVALUATION OF FEED FOR ENERGY FOR RUMINANTS AND NON-RUMINANTS
Dr. Abhishek Sharma
Evaluation of feeds is concerned with the assessment of the quantities in which nutrients are supplied by feeds as well as the assessment of the quantities in which they are required by different classes of farm animals.
The major organic nutrients i.e. energy and protein are required by animals as materials for the construction of body tissues, the synthesis of milk and eggs and for work production. A unifying feature of these diverse functions is that they all involve a transfer of energy from chemical energy to heat energy (when nutrients are oxidized) or when chemical energy is converted from one form to another (when body fat is synthesized from carbohydrate). The ability of a feed to supply energy is therefore of great importance in determining its nutritive value
EVALUATION OF FEED FOR ENERGY
FORM OF ENERGY-
The original source of energy, the sun, or solar energy is stored in plants in the form of carbohydrates, lipids and protein through photosynthesis. This stored chemical energy becomes available to man and animals.
Definition of Energy-
Energy is defined as the capacity to do work. As we know, heat is measurement in some units know as calories.
According to the first law of thermodynamics all forms of energy can be quantitatively converted into heat energy. It is convenient to express heat energy in the body as heat units.
Basic Terms
Calorie (cal): A calorie is the amount of heat required to raise the temperature of one gram of water to 10C ( from 14.5°C to 15.5°C).
*1 Cal= 4.184 Joule
* 1 joule = 0.239 calories
Kilo calorie (Kcal): A kilo calorie is the heat required to raise temperature of 1 kg of water by 1°C. A kilo calorie is equal to 1000 calories.
Mega calorie (Mcal): A mega calorie is equivalent to 1000 Kcal or Therm. But Mcal is the preferred term.
British Thermal Unit (BTU): A BTU is the amount of heat required to raise 1 lb of water by 1°F. One kilo calorie approximately equals 4 BTU.
1 Kilo Calories= 4 BTU
1 Kilo Calories = 4.184 KJ
1 KJ = 0.239 KCal
Method for measuring the value of any feed is to determine the amount of digestible nutrients that is supplied to the animals following systems are used.
Gross energy (GE)
Digestible energy (DE)
Metabolizable energy (ME)
Net energy (NE)
Total digestible nutrient (TDN)
Starch equivalent (SE)
Scandinavian feed unit
Physiological fuel value (PFV)
Nutritive ratio (NR)
Palatants are often used in feed for their ability to confer an attractive smell and taste to feed, with the aim of stimulating intake. The important role of feed palatability in livestock animals, and particularly in some ruminants, is reflected in their sensitivity to the smell and taste of feed, which influences their feeding behaviour.
Austin Journal of Veterinary Science & Animal Husbandry is an open access, peer reviewed, scholarly journal dedicated to publish articles in all areas of Veterinary Science.
The aim of the journal is to provide a forum for researchers, physicians, academicians and other Veterinary professionals to find most recent advances in the areas of diagnosis and treatments in Veterinary sciences.
Austin Journal of Veterinary Science & Animal Husbandry accepts original research articles, review articles, case reports, clinical images and rapid communication on all the aspects of Veterinary Science.
gerencia en nutricion: Gestion del capital humanogabriela garcia
1 Gestión del Capital Humano.
Definición. Objetivos. Importancia
Competencias.
Tipos de Competencias.
Competencias Generales
Competencias Específicas.
Categorías del personal en Servicio de Alimentación.
Análisis, Especificación y Descripción de los cargos.
2 Proceso de Gestión del Capital Humano por competencias.
Definición de las Competencias del personal.
Diseño del perfil por competencias.
Captación del personal.
Formación y desarrollo
Evaluación y desarrollo.
Plan de carrera.
3 Aspectos legales a nivel laboral.
Relaciones laborales. Sindicatos.
LOTTT(prestaciones , utilidades, vacaciones, ince, seguro social obligatorio)
Instituto Nacional de Prevención, Salud y Seguridad Laborales (INPSASEL).
Ley de la Alimentación para trabajadores y trabajadoras.
Deontología Profesional.
Sistema integrado de control agroalimentario SICA-SADA.
4 Turnos y Horarios.
Definición. Consideraciones Legales. Lineamientos para la elaboración.
Determinación de Número de trabajadores en un Servicio de Alimentación.
Sueldos, Salarios y Beneficios Laborales.
5 Seguridad Laboral en un Servicio de Alimentación.
Términos Básicos.
Seguridad Industrial.
Riesgo. Peligro. Acto inseguro. Incidente. Otros.
Accidente. Causas de los accidentes. Disciplina Organizacional.
Procedimientos cuando ocurre un accidente laboral. (INPSASEL )
6 Riesgos profesionales que está expuesto el personal de un Servicio de Alimentación.
Prevención de Riesgos Laborales.
Análisis de Riesgos Laborales
Equipos de Protección Personal (EPP). Clasificación.
Clases. de las señales de Seguridad.
Balancing Fat Nutrition to Optimise Transition Cow Performance
A cow’s transition period is a key time since most of the metabolic and infectious diseases occur then.
Higher demand of energy and nutrients for the synthesis of colostrum and milk coupled with decreased feed intake force the transition cows to undergo negative energy balance (NEB) and micronutrient deficiencies. When metabolism does not meet production demands, incidence of clinical or subclinical metabolic disorders increases. Because innate and acquired immunity are suboptimal during this period, animals are more prone to infection
Proper supplementation at this moment may prevent future diseases and production losses.
In early lactation, the challenge for the cow to shift gear to accelerate copious milk production against loss of appetite results in nutrient deficiencies and subsequent negative energy balance leading to mobilisation of body reserves and compromised immunity
(Fiore et al., 2017).
Endocrine, adipose tissue, liver, digestive system and mammary gland are key components of the adaptations that dairy cows experience to achieve the necessary balance to adjust to the onset of sustained increasing milk production.
If unchecked metabolic stress in the affected cows can burden dairy producers with increased poor cow health, infertility, culling rates, inefficient nutrient utilisation and economic loss
In early lactation, the challenge for the cow to shift gear to accelerate copious milk production against loss of appetite results in nutrient deficiencies and subsequent negative energy balance leading to mobilisation of body reserves and compromised immunity
(Fiore et al., 2017).
Endocrine, adipose tissue, liver, digestive system and mammary gland are key components of the adaptations that dairy cows experience to achieve the necessary balance to adjust to the onset of sustained increasing milk production.
If unchecked metabolic stress in the affected cows can burden dairy producers with increased poor cow health, infertility, culling rates, inefficient nutrient utilisation and economic loss
In early lactation, the challenge for the cow to shift gear to accelerate copious milk production against loss of appetite results in nutrient deficiencies and subsequent negative energy balance leading to mobilisation of body reserves and compromised immunity
(Fiore et al., 2017).
Endocrine, adipose tissue, liver, digestive system and mammary gland are key components of the adaptations that dairy cows experience to achieve the necessary balance to adjust to the onset of sustained increasing milk production.
If unchecked metabolic stress in the affected cows can burden dairy producers with in
There are many factors which affect feed intake of chickens and hence determine nutrient intake level and efficiency of poultry production. Although the spectrum of these factors is very broad, here the focus will be made on management and environment, feed and water, and physical factors. Management and environment play an important role in controlling feed intake and efficiency. Poultry producers should, therefore, make use of the current technology and recent research works aiming at optimising management practices and micro-environment for better feed intake and utilisation.
Dietary Intervention with Yoghurt, Synbiotic Yogurt or Traditional Fermented ...Mostafa Gouda
Dietary Intervention with Yoghurt, Synbiotic
Yogurt or Traditional Fermented Sobya:
Bio-Potency among Male Adolescents Using
Five Bio-Markers of Relevance to Colonic
Metabolic Activities
This slides contains information on precision feeding in dairy cattle and requirement of energy, protein, fat, minerals and vitamins of a dairy cattle during lactation. Precision feeding protects reproductive health and milk production while reducing the nutrient loss in manure.
Only 25-35% of the N in feed goes into milk, with the rest excreted in feces and urine.
Dairy diets often have 120-160% of the P and that the excess is excreted in the manure.
Cost of feed can be reduced.
Precision feeding helps to improve water quality
Improving the efficiency of use of feed N.
Reduce SARA condition.
Controlled-release urea in dairy cattle feed.
Straw treatment-Ammoniation.
Reducing Enteric Methane Losses from Ruminant Livestock.
Phase feeding in dairy cattle.
Feeding bypass fat in early lactation.
Use of chelated minerals in dairy animals.
Nutraceuticals in dairy animal precision feeding.
10. Use of area specific mineral mixture to precise dairy animal nutrition.
11. TMR in precision nutrition.
12. Manipulation of dietary CAD.
Five distinct feeding phases can be defined to attain optimum production, reproduction and health of dairy cows:
Early lactation—0 to 70 days (peak milk production) after calving (postpartum).
Peak DM intake—70 to 140 days (declining milk production) postpartum.
Mid and late lactation—140 to 305 days (declining milk production) postpartum.
Dry period—60 days before the next lactation.
Transition or close-up period—14 days before to parturition.
Feed top quality forage.
Make sure the diet contains adequate amounts of CP, DIP and UIP.
Increase grain intake at a constant rate after calving.
Consider adding fat (0.4-0.6 kg/cow/day) to diets.
Allow constant access to feed.
Minimize stress conditions.
Limit urea to 80-160g/day.
Buffers, such as Na bicarbonate alone or in combination with Mg oxide (rumen pH)
In Transition period
Increase grain feeding, so cows are consuming 4.5-6 kg grain/day at calving (1% of B.wt)
Increase protein in the ration to between 14 - 15 % of the ration DM
Limit fat in the ration to 0.1kg. High fat feeding will depress DM intake.
Maintain 2.5-4kg of long hay in the ration to stimulate rumination.
Feed a low-Ca ration (< 0.20%, reduce Ca intake to 14 to 18 g/d)
Also, feed a diet with a negative dietary electrolyte balance (-10 to -15meq/100 g DM) may alleviate milk fever problems
Niacin (to control ketosis) and/or anionic salts (to help prevent milk fever) should be included in the ration during this period.
Thanks to an extensive research program achieved by its experts in bioengineering and monogastric nutrition, Adisseo found a solution to get more from NSP enzymes. With Rovabio® Advance, the first “Feedase”, the total digestibility of feed vegetable fraction is improved by 3 percent whatever the type of diet. This article is the opportunity to come back to the mode of action of NSP enzymes and explain why we can expect more nutrients, especially from corn, thanks to innovation.
Similar to Benefits of fiber degrading enzymes in dairy cow diets (20)
Levelwise PageRank with Loop-Based Dead End Handling Strategy : SHORT REPORT ...Subhajit Sahu
Abstract — Levelwise PageRank is an alternative method of PageRank computation which decomposes the input graph into a directed acyclic block-graph of strongly connected components, and processes them in topological order, one level at a time. This enables calculation for ranks in a distributed fashion without per-iteration communication, unlike the standard method where all vertices are processed in each iteration. It however comes with a precondition of the absence of dead ends in the input graph. Here, the native non-distributed performance of Levelwise PageRank was compared against Monolithic PageRank on a CPU as well as a GPU. To ensure a fair comparison, Monolithic PageRank was also performed on a graph where vertices were split by components. Results indicate that Levelwise PageRank is about as fast as Monolithic PageRank on the CPU, but quite a bit slower on the GPU. Slowdown on the GPU is likely caused by a large submission of small workloads, and expected to be non-issue when the computation is performed on massive graphs.
Chatty Kathy - UNC Bootcamp Final Project Presentation - Final Version - 5.23...John Andrews
SlideShare Description for "Chatty Kathy - UNC Bootcamp Final Project Presentation"
Title: Chatty Kathy: Enhancing Physical Activity Among Older Adults
Description:
Discover how Chatty Kathy, an innovative project developed at the UNC Bootcamp, aims to tackle the challenge of low physical activity among older adults. Our AI-driven solution uses peer interaction to boost and sustain exercise levels, significantly improving health outcomes. This presentation covers our problem statement, the rationale behind Chatty Kathy, synthetic data and persona creation, model performance metrics, a visual demonstration of the project, and potential future developments. Join us for an insightful Q&A session to explore the potential of this groundbreaking project.
Project Team: Jay Requarth, Jana Avery, John Andrews, Dr. Dick Davis II, Nee Buntoum, Nam Yeongjin & Mat Nicholas
Adjusting primitives for graph : SHORT REPORT / NOTESSubhajit Sahu
Graph algorithms, like PageRank Compressed Sparse Row (CSR) is an adjacency-list based graph representation that is
Multiply with different modes (map)
1. Performance of sequential execution based vs OpenMP based vector multiply.
2. Comparing various launch configs for CUDA based vector multiply.
Sum with different storage types (reduce)
1. Performance of vector element sum using float vs bfloat16 as the storage type.
Sum with different modes (reduce)
1. Performance of sequential execution based vs OpenMP based vector element sum.
2. Performance of memcpy vs in-place based CUDA based vector element sum.
3. Comparing various launch configs for CUDA based vector element sum (memcpy).
4. Comparing various launch configs for CUDA based vector element sum (in-place).
Sum with in-place strategies of CUDA mode (reduce)
1. Comparing various launch configs for CUDA based vector element sum (in-place).
Benefits of fiber degrading enzymes in dairy cow diets
1. www.WATTAgNet.com ❙ January/February 2017
20 ❙ FeedManagement
High feed costs and mounting
consumer concerns about the use
of antibiotic growth promoters
(AGPs) in livestock production
provide ample incentive to revisit
and refine the use of enzymes in
ruminant diets.
Enzymes can improve feed
efficiency and reduce the cost of
milk production. Feed additives
with enzymatic fiber-degrading
activity offer a potential to
enhance forage digestion, feed
efficiency and income over feed
costs (IOFC). The application of
a blend of cellulase and xylanase
enzyme products to forages
(corn silage and alfalfa hay)
prior to feeding of 55:45 forage
to concentrate diets can increase
IOFC from $0.32 to $0.88 per
cow daily.
When combining data from
20 studies and 41 treatments
that added fiber-degrading ex-
ogenous enzymes to dairy cow
diets, Canadian researchers
reported overall increases in dry
matter (DM) intake and milk
yield of 2.2 ± 2.9 and 2.4 ± 3.3
lbs/day, respectively.
While the responses to the
addition of fiber-degrading en-
zymes to dairy cow diets vary,
the variability is not surprising
because most of the commer-
cially available enzyme products
that have been evaluated as
ruminant feed additives are pro-
duced for non-feed applications.
Feed enzymes for ruminants
contain mainly cellulase and
hemicellulase activities and are
of fungal (mostly Trichoderma
longibrachiatum, Aspergillus
niger, A. oryzae) and bacterial
(Bacillus spp.) origin.
Mode of action
Improvements in animal per-
formance due to the use of feed
enzymes have been attributed to
increases in feed digestion.
In three studies conducted
in lactating dairy cows, fiber-
degrading enzyme applications
enhanced DM digestibility, 4 to
12 percent, and neutral detergent
Benefits of fiber-degrading
enzymes in dairy cow diets
The addition of enzymatic feed additives to dairy cow diets increases
feed intake, animal performance
BY ALVARO GARCIA AND FERNANDO DIAZ
Fiber-degrading enzyme
applications can enhance dry
matter digestibility by up to
12 percent.
ConstantinOprus,Dreamstime
2. January/February 2017 ❙ www.WATTAgNet.com
FeedManagement ❙ 21
fiber (NDF) by 7 to 40 percent.
Three main factors explain
the mechanisms by which fiber-
degrading enzymes increase diges-
tion and utilization of feedstuffs in
ruminant diets:
1. Feeds are structurally very
complex, containing a variety of
polysaccharides, protein, lipids,
lignin, and phenolic acids, often
in intimate association.
2. Enzyme additives are usually
blends of enzymes with many
different actions, each of which
differ in optimal conditions and
specificities.
3. Ruminal fluid is, by nature, an
extremely complex microbial
ecosystem containing many
hundreds of microbial species
and their enzymes. Attempting
to identify the individual mode
of action of enzymes under such
conditions would be nearly im-
possible.
Scientific review points to
enzymes
Data obtained from 24 scientific
articles published between 1999
and 2012, which studied the effect
of dietary addition of fiber-degrad-
ing enzyme products on the per-
formance of lactating dairy cows,
included 27 trials and 94 treatments
conducted on research stations and
commercial dairy farms.
All studies evaluated exogenous
fiber-degrading enzyme products
with cellulase and xylanase activi-
ties, except two of them, which sup-
plemented exclusively cellulases.
Read more: How animal feed enzymes
can improve producer profitability:
www.WATTAgNet.com/articles/25854
3. www.WATTAgNet.com ❙ January/February 2017
22 ❙ FeedManagement
BENEFITS OF FIBER-DEGRADING ENZYMES
In addition to cellulase and xylanase
activities, some enzyme complexes
contained ferulic acid stearase, amy-
lase, pectinase or protease activities.
Enzymes were added to the diet
at feeding time or only a few hours
before; therefore, this article does
not include trials in which enzymes
were applied to forage at ensiling.
Several methods of adding en-
zymes to the diets were used across
the studies. Enzyme products were
applied to different portions of the
diets including forage, concentrate,
or complete, total mixed ration ei-
ther in liquid or in powder forms.
Furthermore, some experiments
compared the different methods of
feeding enzymes to dairy cows.
Effects on feed intake
Fiber-degrading enzymes added
to dairy cow diets are often accom-
panied by increased feed intake.
This can be attributed to increased
palatability due to sugars released
on the feed itself before it is fed
and/or enzyme effects once in the
rumen that result in improved fiber
digestibility, gut fill reduction, and
increased intake.
Fiber-digesting enzymes in-
creased intake by 2.4 to 7.0 lbs/day
in 4 out of 27 of the trials examined
(14.8 percent).
Dry matter intake (DMI) was not
affected when 5.5 lbs./day of DM of
an enzyme blend of cellulases and
xylanases were added to the total
mixed ration (TMR).
When the inclusion rate was
doubled, however, DMI increased
by 14.3 percent. In contrast, in
other experiments DMI increased
ENZYMES CAN
IMPROVE FEED
efficiency and
reduce the
cost of milk
production.
4. January/February 2017 ❙ www.WATTAgNet.com
FeedManagement ❙ 25
regardless of the enzyme concen-
tration. Moreover, the response of
the addition of a fiber-digesting
enzyme formulation to diets of dairy
cows varied with stage of lactation.
University of Idaho researchers de-
tected increased DMI with enzyme
addition, in weeks three to seven, but
not weeks eight to 16 of lactation.
This difference observed on in-
take between early and late lactation
may be due to the effects of ruminal
fiber digestibility on feed intake. In
early lactation, cows are usually in
negative energy balance, suggesting
fill, and not energy demand, regu-
lates intake. Late-lactation cows,
on the other hand, are usually in
positive energy balance, suggesting
energy demand, and not fill, regu-
lates DMI. Therefore, intake of later
lactation cows is less affected by
increasing ruminal fiber digestibility
because rumen fill does not limit in-
take in properly balanced TMR. ■
References available upon request.
BENEFITS OF FIBER-DEGRADING ENZYMES
Editor’s note: This is the first installment in a three-part series.
Alvaro Garcia obtained his DVM from the College of Veterinary Medicine Montevideo, Uruguay. After working 14 years as
Extension Dairy Specialist for South Dakota State University, he is currently Director of Agriculture and Natural Resources.
Fernando Diaz, DVM, PhD works as an independent dairy consultant at GPS Dairy Consulting, L.L.C. He provides
nutrition and management consultation to dairies including milk quality, cow welfare, people management and
organizational effectiveness.