The document is a financial overview of Autonomy Corporation, detailing its revenue growth, financial performance, and market positioning from 2008 to 2012. The company, founded in 1996 and based in San Francisco and Cambridge, projects continued growth in revenue and EBITDA margins, driven by its core software solutions for managing unstructured data. Key financials include an expected revenue of $963 million for 2011 and a significant customer base of over 20,000, indicating strong market demand for its products.

1. Autonomy Overview
DRAFT
Preliminary | Subject to Further Review and Evaluation
January 2011

2. Autonomy Overview
Summary Financial Performance
($MM, except per share amounts)
Dual Headquarters San Francisco, CA Fiscal Year Ended December 31,
Cambridge, U.K. 2008A 2009A 2010E 2011E 2012E
Revenue $503 $740 $866 $963 $1,079
Founding Founded in June 1996 by world-leading researchers Annual Growth 47% 47% 17% 11% 12%
from University of Cambridge Gross Profit 458 652 764 856 969
Gross Margin 91% 88% 88% 89% 90%
IPO July 1998 at a split-adjusted price of $1.23 (approx. £0.70) EBITDA 226 360 426 505 585
EBITDA Margin 45% 49% 49% 52% 54%
Employees 1,800 (10% Administrative, 60% Technical, 30% Sales and Marketing) Free Cash Flow 121 191 281 322 487
Free Cash Flow Margin 24% 26% 32% 33% 45%
Customers/OEMs 20,000+ Customers, 400+ OEMs with over 500 product licenses Net Income 148 233 289 343 399
Net Income Margin 29% 31% 33% 36% 37%
Geographic Mix 70% Americas, 30% Rest of World Diluted EPS 0.68 0.97 1.09 1.27 1.48
Annual Growth 81% 43% 12% 17% 16%
Key Verticals Education, Energy & Utilities, Financial Services, Government, Source: Projections based on Bank of America Merrill Lynch research as of October 19, 2010.
Healthcare, Investigative, Legal, Manufacturing, Professional Note: Free Cash Flow defined as Operating Cash Flow less Cap Ex and Investment in Product Development.
Gross Profit adjusted for amortization of acq related intangibles.
Services/Consulting, Retail & Consumer, Technology, Telecom EBITDA adjusted for amortization of acq related intangibles, SBC, foreign exchange, and non-recurring items.
Sales Channel Primarily indirect through 400 Value Added Resellers such as
Accenture, IBM Global Services, Cap Gemini, HP and Wipro Trading Overview
($MM, except per share amounts)
Product Overview Software infrastructure solutions that form an understanding of
content, allowing for powerful meaning-based data processing Share Price £14.78 / $23.66
Fully-Diluted Equity Value (1) $5,811
Intelligent Data Operating Layer (IDOL) Server – collects Plus: Debt (1) 945
indexed data, enriching it with conceptual and contextual Less: Cash (1) 1,028
understanding Fully-Diluted Enterprise Value (1) $5,728
 Core infrastructure of Autonomy’s solutions CY10E Statistic (2)
Revenue $866 6.6x
Power solutions – search and management built around IDOL EBITDA 426 13.4
 Markets include Search, BPM, and OEMs Earnings per Share 1.09 21.7
CY11E
Protect solutions – regulatory and compliance platform Revenue $963 5.9x
 Markets include eDiscovery, Archiving & Records, Content EBITDA 505 11.3
management, Compliance Earnings per Share 1.27 18.6
Note: Current market prices as of January 24, 2011, converted from
Promote solutions – marketing and customer interaction GBP to USD at a constant spot exchange rate of 1.60.
 Markets include Web Content Management, eBusiness, (1) Net Debt based on Autonomy Form 6-K for the period ended September 30, 2010.
Marketing Optimization, Rich Media Management, Contact Includes £500 ($800) convertible debt with strike price of £20.63 ($33.03).
Center (2) Projections based on Bank of America Merrill Lynch research as of October 19, 2010.
Source: Company filings.
2

3. Key Financial Metrics
Historical Revenues Organic IDOL Revenue Growth YoY
$MM
Autonomy estimates organic IDOL growth by
800 $740 40% comparing prior period reported results with
current period results (less any contribution
from acquisitions and excluding services)
600 30%
$503
400 $343 20%
$251
200 10%
$96
0 0%
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3
2007 2008 2009 2010
Historical Margins Attractive Revenue Mix (in $MM, LTM)
Gross EBITDA
Margins Margins Services, $41
100% 94% 91% 91% 70% 5% IDOL
89% 88%
Deferred Product, $249
60% Revenue,
80% 49% 29%
45% 50% $250
29%
60% 34% 40%
29%
40% 30%
15% 20%
13% 22%
20% OEM
10% Ongoing, 2% IDOL Cloud,
0% 0% $115 OEM Dev, $184
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 $11
Source: Company filings.
3 Note: OEM Ongoing refers to sales of OEMs’ products.
OEM Dev refers to a non-refundable, upfront development license fee.

4. Data Management Market Dynamics
The secular migration towards unstructured data has created a large and meaningful addressable opportunity in
managing, regulating and monetizing the use of information
Structured Data Management Current RDBMS solutions only address Unstructured Data Management
~20% of the total data management market
• 15% of total data(1) • 85% of total data(1)
• Size: $18bn Unstructured data is expected to grow twice • Size: $20bn (email, video, voice, etc)
• Traditional structured data CAGR of as fast as structured data • Unstructured data CAGR of 63.7%
32.3% from 2006 – 2010 (IDC) from 2006 – 2010 (IDC)
Power: Manage and Search Protect: Legal and Compliance Promote: Marketing
(~40% of 2009 Revenue) (~40% of 2009 Revenue) (~20% of 2009 Revenue)
While enterprises only create 20% of all data, Data needing protection in 2020 is the U.S. behaviorally targeted online
they need to manage transmission, storage, size of the entire digital universe in 2018 advertising spending(2)
security and compliance for more than 85% of it EB (Exabytes) $MM
18,000 $5,000
User generated content Enterprise touch content $4,400
~900 EB (Exabytes) ~960 EB 16,000
14,000 $4,000
Data Needing Protection
12,000
Data Actually Protected $3,000 $2,700
10,000
Overlap Enterprise
~600 generated 8,000
$2,000 $1,700
EB content 6,000
$1,100
~240 EB 4,000 $775
$1,000 $525
2,000
0 $0
2010: ~1,200 EB 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Source: Company filings, IDC, Industry research.
4 (1) Bank of America Merrill Lynch estimates.
(2) Source: eMarketer. Refers to advertising displayed to a select audience whose interest or intentions are revealed by website or ISP tracking data, audience segmentation and/or predictive analysis; excludes ads
targeted using adware.

5. Key Fundamental Differentiators
Autonomy’s IDOL Structured Probabilistic Engine (SPE) can be leveraged across verticals, functions and connectors
Power: Manage and Search Protect: Legal and Compliance Promote: Marketing
• Proliferation of unstructured • Proliferation and increasing • Rich media and content explosion
information in enterprise IT complexity of data regulations • Shift from cost per thousand impressions
Drivers • Secular migration towards • Reputational risk and tougher (CPM) to cost per action (CPA)
automation versus adding headcount to sanctions for breaches advertising model
reduce operating expenditures • Need to demonstrate ROI
• Real-time Policy Management • Multichannel Customer Mgmt
• Enterprise Search • Early Case Assessment • Social Media Analysis
• Business Process Management • E-mail and Audio Archiving • Rich Media Management
Applications • Business Intelligence • Advanced eDiscovery • eCommerce Solutions
• Information Access • Retention and Disposition • Web Content Optimization
• ~100 customers standardized on IDOL • Early signs of second phase adoption
• Establishing pipes in core IT • Growth constant through recession and • Contribution geared to a recovery
Growth platforms builds defensibility upturn • 15-25% growth
• 10-15% growth (of which OEMs • 15-20% growth
growing at 20% plus YoY)
• Market leading solution • Produces tangible results
• IDOL solution universally recognized • Largest, most visible eDiscovery cases • Delta Air Lines sales: +$30MM
Commercial • OEM reaches 95% of customers in • 87% of the Fortune 100 • LexisNexis e-mail clickthroughs: +103%
Leadership market (~5% product penetration • 10 of the top 10 global banks • Amnesty Int’l donation
suggests significant growth opportunity) • 10 of the top 10 law firms clickthroughs:+157%
• Major government agencies • Lenovo orders: +400 per week
5

6. IDOL Software Business Model
Gross margins over 90%, operating margins over 50%, 30% of revenue deferred
Business Delivery Model Illustrative Customer Over Time
• License (~$850k ASP) $MM Once a decision has been taken to standardize, some
• Support & Maintenance (~15% p.a.) $60 customers have made upwards of 40 repeat purchases
Standard – in Q3’10 > 65% sales were repeat
Product • Typical sale 4 connectors, 4 functions
• 65% recurring revenue
Rich Media Management
$50 $2
• 400+ OEMs (~5 year deals)
• Royalty-based ~3% (no deferred revenue, 100% gross margin) Policy Management $5
IDOL OEMs – 10-14 signed per quarter
– 35% year-on-year revenue growth $2
$2
$40
Website
$5
• Paid monthly and typically 3-year contracts
• Collected in arrears (no deferred revenue) Call Center
IDOL Cloud • The world’s largest private legally compliant cloud
at over 17 Petabytes of data $30
$15 Enterprise Search
$51
• Mixture of traditional license and hosted revenues
• Timing of revenues varies per contract $20
Hybrid Model • Some deferred revenues Legal Hold
• New model focused on quick time to value, $10 $20
high return eDiscovery
Appliance – Archiving (Arcpliance)
– Email (DSmail)
– eDiscovery
$0
6

7. Competitive Positioning
Data Management Leader Message Archiving Software (Forrester Wave)
AUTONOMY LEADS THE DATA MANAGEMENT INDUSTRY WITH
MEANING BASED COMPUTING
Strength of Current Offering
Symantec Autonomy
Network Effects Technology and vendor agnostic nature of IDOL leads to CA
increasing adoption by OEM vendors
Technology Over $135m in R&D spend in last 12 months; 170 patents; Open Text
EMC
100% of technology is owned IBM
HP
Standardization Connects to over 400 content repositories and over 1,000 file
formats (one new connection within IDOL can replace 9,000 new Quest
connections between entities)
Installed Base Over 20,000 customers and 400 partners
Acquisitions Successful track record in integrating and expanding IDOL
technology across customers and use cases Strength of Strategy
Enterprise Search (Forrester Wave) Web Content Management (Gartner Magic Quadrant)
Autonomy
FAST, a Microsoft subsidiary
Strength of Current Offering
Endeca Oracle
Vivisimo Autonomy
Ability to Execute
Microsoft Open Text
InQuira SDL
Recommind IBM IBM
Oracle FatWire Sitecore
Coveo Google
Atex IPiServer Day Software
Alterian Ektron
Microsoft CoreMedia
Percussion
Dynamicweb Clickability
Strength of Strategy Completeness of Vision
Source: Gartner, Forrester Research.
7

8. 400+ Partners and 20,000+ Customers
Across Multiple Verticals
Customers
Partners
Tech/Comm Pharma/Food Media Consumer/Mfg Finance Legal/Govt
8

9. Acquisitions
Acquisition Strategy
• Since 2003, Autonomy has successfully acquired 11 businesses with ~$600mm in cumulative LTM revenue
• Autonomy’s strategy has been to focus on specific markets in which IDOL can be substituted as the foundation for existing technologies and
leveraged across customer environments
• This has provided Autonomy rapid cost savings and the addition of installed base and channel has created significant cross-sell / up-sell
opportunities associated with additional functionality
M&A Transaction History
($MM)
Fully-Diluted Transaction Multiples
Annc Equity Ent Revenue Revenue P/E 1-Day
Date Target Description Value Value LTM NTM LTM NTM LTM NTM Prem
Autonomy
Jun-10 CA's Governance Unit Information governance software $19 $19 - - - - - - -
Feb-09 MicroLink ERP systems integration $55 $55 - - - - - - -
Jan-09 Interwoven Enterprise content management $803 $618 $260 $292 2.4x 2.1x 21.9x 19.5x 37%
Oct-07 Meridio Documents & record management $41 $41 $27 - 1.5x - - - -
Jul-07 ZANTAZ Electronic archiving and e-discovery $375 $375 $100 - 3.8x - - - -
Nov-05 Verity Data & content indexing and search $503 $311 $144 $150 2.2x 2.1x 45.0x 32.9x 30%
Apr-05 etalk Call center monitoring $70 $70 $37 - 1.9x - - - -
Jul-03 Virage Automated audio and video surveillance $25 $18 $12 - 1.5x - - - -
Mean: 2.2x 2.1x 33.4x 26.2x 34%
Median: 2.0x 2.1x 33.4x 26.2x 34%
Sources: Company filings, press releases, 451 Group and Wall Street Research.
9

10. Trading Statistics of Selected Companies
App. Infrastructure / Data Management Systems Infrastructure Software SaaS
$40,000 $37,845
Enterprise Value
$30,000
$17,495
($MM)
$16,977
$20,000 $11,359
$7,940 $7,317 $7,251 $5,728
$10,000 $4,502 $4,312 $4,001 $2,648 $2,454 $2,180 $1,886 $1,743
$0
VMW CRM ADBE CTXS BMC RHT TDC Autonomy INFA Software AG TIBX OTEX CNQR SFSF QLIK PRGS
$5,000 $4,163
$4,000 $3,412
(CY11E, $MM)
Revenue
$3,000 $2,109 $2,093 $2,058 $2,023
$2,000 $1,595
$1,014 $995 $963 $840 $740
$1,000 $564 $369 $268 $254
$0
ADBE VMW BMC TDC CTXS CRM Software AG OTEX RHT Autonomy TIBX INFA PRGS CNQR QLIK SFSF
100%
73% App. Infra. Median = 17%
Revenue CAGR
75% Infra. Software Median = 15%
55% 49% SaaS Median = 40%
5-Year
50% 40% 35% 32% 27%
20% 19% 17% 15% 14%
25% 11% 6% 6% 5%
0%
SFSF Autonomy VMW CRM QLIK CNQR RHT Software AG INFA OTEX CTXS ADBE TIBX BMC TDC PRGS
60% 52% App. Infra. Median = 28%
46%
EBITDA Margin
42% Infra. Software Median = 33%
(CY11E, $MM)
45% 33% 32% 32% 30% 30% 30% 28% 28% SaaS Median = 19%
27% 26%
30% 19% 18%
15% 5%
0%
Autonomy BMC ADBE VMW PRGS CTXS OTEX RHT CNQR Software AG TIBX INFA TDC CRM QLIK SFSF
12.0x 11.1x App. Infra. Median = 3.5x
8.6x 8.6x Infra. Software Median = 5.5x
EV / Revenue
9.0x 7.4x 7.0x 6.7x 6.1x 5.9x SaaS Median = 8.6x
(CY11E)
5.5x 4.8x
6.0x 4.1x 3.8x 3.5x 3.1x 2.7x 2.6x
3.0x
0.0x
VMW CRM SFSF RHT QLIK CNQR INFA Autonomy CTXS TIBX ADBE BMC TDC PRGS Software AG OTEX
Sources: Capital IQ, company filings, press releases and Wall Street research. Excludes stock-based compensation. Autonomy figures based on Bank of America Merrill Lynch research as of October 19, 2010.
10 Note: Current prices as of January 24, 2011. 5-Year CAGRs based on CY2005 to CY2010.
Revenue growth rate for Qlik Technologies are based on CY2008 to CY2009.
Negative earnings noted as NM.

11. Operating Statistics of Selected Companies
App. Infrastructure / Data Management Systems Infrastructure Software SaaS
50% 44% App. Infra. Median = 13%
38% 38%
40% Infra. Software Median = 11%
EPS CAGR
27% SaaS Median = 29%
30% 21%
5-Year
19% 17%
20% 15% 13% 13% 11% 10% 9% 8% 8%
10% NM
0%
VMW Autonomy CRM OTEX Software AG CNQR TIBX BMC INFA TDC RHT PRGS ADBE QLIK CTXS SFSF
60% 52% App. Infra. Median = 16%
45% Infra. Software Median = 15%
EPS Growth
Long Term
29% 28% SaaS Median = 28%
30% 25% 23% 19% 18% 18% 17% 16% 15% 15% 14% 13% 12% 12%
15%
0%
QLIK CRM SFSF CNQR VMW RHT INFA OTEX Autonomy TIBX PRGS BMC Software AG TDC CTXS ADBE
100.0x 263.6x
87.9x App. Infra. Median = 22.5x
75.0x 58.5x Infra. Software Median = 28.5x
54.2x 48.9x SaaS Median = 87.9x
47.1x
(CY11E)
P/E
50.0x 32.8x 28.5x 24.2x 22.5x 18.6x
25.0x 16.6x 15.5x 14.8x 13.7x 11.4x
0.0x
SFSF CRM QLIK CNQR VMW RHT INFA CTXS TIBX TDC Autonomy PRGS BMC ADBE Software AG OTEX
4.0x 9.6x
3.0x App. Infra. Median = 1.1x
2.5x Infra. Software Median = 2.2x
3.0x 2.4x 2.2x 2.2x SaaS Median = 3.0x
(CY11E)
P/E/G
1.8x 1.8x 1.5x
2.0x 1.2x 1.1x 1.1x 1.1x 1.1x 1.0x
1.0x 0.6x
0.0x
SFSF CRM RHT CTXS CNQR VMW INFA TDC TIBX ADBE QLIK PRGS Autonomy BMC Software AG OTEX
159.9x
50.0x 45.7x App. Infra. Median = 13.2x
38.7x
33.5x
EV / EBITDA
40.0x Infra. Software Median = 17.2x
24.7x SaaS Median = 45.7x
(CY11E)
30.0x 22.9x 22.5x
17.2x 16.8x
20.0x 13.2x 11.3x 9.7x 9.6x 9.5x 8.7x 8.3x
10.0x
0.0x
SFSF CRM QLIK VMW RHT INFA CNQR CTXS TIBX TDC Autonomy ADBE PRGS Software AG OTEX BMC
Sources: Capital IQ, company filings, press releases and Wall Street research. Excludes stock-based compensation. Autonomy figures based on Bank of America Merrill Lynch research as of October 19, 2010.
11 Note: Current prices as of January 24, 2011. 5-Year CAGRs based on CY2005 to CY2010.
EPS growth rate for Qlik Technologies are based on CY2008 to CY2009.
Negative earnings noted as NM.

12. Selected Management and Directors
Joined AU Role Previous Position / Boards Education
Dr. Mike Lynch, OBE(1) 1996 Founder, Founder, Neurodynamics; Director, Autonomy; Ph.D. in Mathematical Computing,
CEO Non-executive Director, BBC, Blinkx, Featurespace, M.A. in Electrical and Information Sciences,
NESTA, Foundation of Science and Technology University of Cambridge
Sushovan Hussain(1) 2001 CFO Corporate Development, LASMO; B.A. in Economics, University of Cambridge;
Ernst & Young Chartered Accountant
Stouffer Egan 2001 CEO – U.S. VP of Corp Development, LeadingSide, Dataware B.A. in Economics, Trinity College
Dr. Peter Menell 1998 Chief CTO, Autonomy; D.Phil., Oxford University;
Management
Research Neuro-Physiology Research B.A. (Hons) and M.Sc., York University
Officer
Andrew Kanter 2000 COO VP, International Operations and Legal Affairs, J.D., USC Law Center; B.A., Johns Hopkins;
Autonomy; Kansai Uni. of Foreign Studies, Osaka, Japan
Brobeck Hale and Dorr; Shearman & Sterling
Eloy Avila 2004 CTO U.S. CTO, Autonomy; B.S. in Electrical Engineering, Stanford University
Research in ultra-efficient electric vehicles
Ian Black 2000 Head of Director, Corporate Communications, Autonomy; Physiology, Henley Management College;
Global MD, Aungate; Head of Corporate Communication, Business Administration, Filton College
Operations BAE Systems
Robert Webb 2009 Non- GC, British Airways; Non-Exec Director BBC, LLB., Exeter University
Executive London Stock Exchange and Argent Group
Chairman
Richard Gaunt 1996 Founder, Technical Director, Autonomy; BSc. and MSc. in Electronic Engineering,
Board Technical Director, Neurodynamics University of Natal
Board of Directors
Member
John McMonigall 1998 Board Apax Partners, British Telecom; -
Director Board Director, Dialog Semiconductor
Jonathan Bloomer 2010 Board Partner, Cerberus; Ex-CEO, Prudential; Arthur BSc. Physics, Imperial College
Director Anderson; Chairman of Lucida, Scottish Re;
Director, Hargreaves Lansdown
Dr. Frank Kelly 2010 Board Professor, University of Cambridge; Ph.D. University of Cambridge;
Director Chief Scientific Advisor, UK Dept of Transport BSc. Durham University
Source: Company Website.
12 (1) Also serves on the Board of Directors.

13. Independent Advisors to the Board
Joined AU Role Previous Position / Boards Education
Barry Ariko 2000 Independent CEO and President, Mirapoint; Chairman, CEO and B.S. in Management, Golden Gate University
Advisor President, Extricity; SVP, AOL; EVP, COO,
Netscape Communications
Richard Perle 2000 Independent Director, Hollinger International; Resident Fellow, M.A. in Politics, Princeton University;
Advisor American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy LSE with Honors Examinations;
Research; United States Assistant Secretary of B.A.. in International Relations, University of
Defense for International Security Policy Southern California
Anthony Bettencourt 2005 Independent Chairman, Blinkx; Advisory Board of Santa Clara B.A. in English, Santa Clara University
Independent Advisors
Advisor University's Center for Science, Technology and
Society; CEO, Verity
Dr. Nick Kingsbury 2005 Independent University Lecturer in Signal Processing, University Honours Degree and Ph.D. in Electrical
Advisor of Cambridge; Director of Studies in Information Engineering, University of Cambridge
Engineering, Trinity College, Cambridge; Group
Leader, Marconi Space and Defense Systems
Professor William J. - Independent Professor of Applied Statistics and Signal Processing B.Sc., MSc., and Ph.D. in Physics, University of
Fitzgerald Advisor in the Department of Engineering, University of Birmingham
Cambridge
Professor Peter Rayner - Independent Emeritus Professor, University of Cambridge; Ph. D., Aston University;
Advisor Emeritus Fellow of Christ's College, University of M.A., University of Cambridge
Cambridge, Head of the Signal Processing and
Communications Research Group at University of
Cambridge
Source: Company Website.
13 (1) Also serves on the Board of Directors.

14. Disclaimer
These materials have been prepared by Qatalyst Partners LP (including any affiliates “Qatalyst”) for the Qatalyst client or potential client to whom such materials are directly
addressed and delivered (the “Company”) in connection with an actual or potential mandate or engagement and may not be used or relied upon for any purpose other than as
specifically contemplated by a written agreement with Qatalyst. These materials are based on information provided by or on behalf of the Company and/or other potential
transaction participants, from public sources or otherwise reviewed by Qatalyst. Qatalyst assumes no responsibility for independent investigation or verification of such
information and has relied on such information being complete and accurate in all respects. To the extent such information includes estimates and forecasts of future financial
performance (including estimates of potential cost savings and synergies) prepared by or reviewed with the managements of the Company and/or other potential transaction
participants or obtained from public sources, Qatalyst has assumed that such estimates and forecasts have been reasonably prepared on bases reflecting the best currently available
estimates and judgments of such managements (or, with respect to estimates and forecasts obtained from public sources, represent reasonable estimates). No representation or
warranty, express or implied, is made as to the accuracy or completeness of such information and nothing contained herein is, or shall be relied upon as, a representation, whether
as to the past, the present or the future. These materials were designed for use by specific persons familiar with the business and affairs of the Company and are being furnished
and should be considered only in connection with other information, oral or written, being provided by Qatalyst in connection herewith. These materials are not intended to
provide the sole basis for evaluating, and should not be considered a recommendation with respect to, any transaction or other matter. Prior to entering into any transaction the
Company should determine, without reliance on Qatalyst, the economic risks and merits as well as the legal, tax and accounting characterizations and consequences of any such
transaction. In this regard, by accepting this presentation, the Company acknowledges that (a) Qatalyst is not in the business of providing (and the Company is not relying on
Qatalyst for) legal, tax or accounting advice, (b) there may be legal, tax or accounting risks associated with any transaction, (c) the Company should receive (and rely on) separate
and qualified legal, tax and accounting advice and (d) the Company should apprise senior management as to such legal, tax and accounting advice (and any risks associated with
any transaction) and Qatalyst’s disclaimer as to these matters. Qatalyst does not provide tax advice. Accordingly, any statements contained herein as to tax matters were neither
written nor intended by Qatalyst to be used and cannot be used by any taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding tax penalties that may be imposed on such taxpayer. Any discussion
of tax matters in these materials may have been written in connection with the “promotion” or “marketing” of any transaction contemplated hereby. Accordingly, any taxpayer
should seek advice based on such taxpayer’s particular circumstances from an independent tax advisor. These materials do not constitute an offer or solicitation to sell or
purchase any securities and are not a commitment by Qatalyst to provide or arrange any financing for any transaction or to purchase any security in connection therewith.
Qatalyst is not acting in any other capacity as a fiduciary to the Company. Qatalyst assumes no obligation to update or otherwise revise these materials. These materials have not
been prepared with a view toward public disclosure under state or federal securities laws or otherwise, are intended for the benefit and use of the Company, and may not be
reproduced, disseminated, quoted, summarized or referred to, in whole or in part, without the prior written consent of Qatalyst. These materials may not reflect information
known to other professionals in other business areas of Qatalyst.
Qatalyst is a full service securities firm providing investment banking and other services and products to a wide range of corporations and individuals, domestically and offshore,
from which conflicting interests or duties may arise. In the ordinary course of these activities, Qatalyst may at any time hold long or short positions, and may trade or otherwise
effect transactions, for their own account or the accounts of customers, in debt or equity securities or loans of the Company, potential counterparties, or any other company that
may be involved in a transaction.
Qatalyst is required to obtain, verify and record certain information that identifies each entity that enters into a formal business relationship with it, which information includes the
complete name and address and taxpayer ID number. Qatalyst may also request corporate formation documents, or other forms of identification, to verify information provided.