Assessment of learning focuses on developing and using assessment tools to improve the teaching and learning process. It emphasizes using tests to measure knowledge and thinking skills. There are various types of tests classified according to response method, preparation method, or answer type, such as subjective/essay tests and objective tests. Proper test construction involves determining objectives, developing test items, and establishing validity and reliability. Statistical measures like frequency distributions are used to interpret test scores.
This document discusses assessment of learning and different types of tests used to evaluate student learning. It describes formative and summative assessments, as well as standardized, criterion-referenced, and norm-referenced tests. The stages of test construction are outlined, including planning, trying out drafts, establishing validity and reliability, and interpreting scores. Guidelines are provided for constructing different types of tests such as objective, essay, and recognition tests. The advantages and disadvantages of objective and essay tests are also compared.
This document discusses assessment of learning and various testing methods. It describes different types of tests such as objective tests, diagnostic tests, and standardized tests. It also covers test construction including writing test items, establishing validity and reliability, and interpreting test scores. Both the advantages and disadvantages of objective and essay tests are provided. Statistical measures for interpreting test data include frequency distributions, which list scores and the number of individuals achieving each score. Creating grouped frequency distributions can make interpretation easier when there is a wide range of scores.
This document discusses educational technology and audiovisual aids. It defines audiovisual aids as any device used to communicate an idea and provides several purposes of using visual aids such as challenging students' attention and facilitating understanding. The document also covers different types of visual aids including demonstrations and pictures. It discusses intrinsic and extrinsic classification of devices and different types of tests including essay, objective, and recognition tests. It provides tips for constructing various test types and interpreting test score data through measures like frequency distribution.
Presentation regarding the definition of identification test; advantages & disadvantages; suggestions on how to make good tests.
Disclaimer: I do not claim ownership of the photos used in this slideshow.
The document discusses guidelines for writing different types of objective test items:
1. True-false, matching, and multiple choice items are commonly used selection item types. Suggestions are provided for writing each type to ensure items are unambiguous and test the intended objectives.
2. Supply item types like fill-in-the-blank require students to provide short answers. Guidelines emphasize writing clear, unambiguous items that test recall of important content.
3. Advantages and disadvantages of each item type are outlined. The summary concludes by providing general guidelines for writing test items that validly assess learning objectives without ambiguity or trick questions.
This lesson, along with the succeeding ones, will all be about making / writing effective objective-type tests. In this presentation, the pre-service teacher will equip himself/herself with the needed knowledge to write short-answer and completion type test items.
This document provides guidelines for constructing paper-and-pencil tests. It discusses general principles of testing such as measuring instructional objectives and ensuring validity and reliability. It also describes attributes of a good test, including validity, reliability, objectivity, scorability and administrability. The steps in constructing classroom tests are identified as identifying objectives, listing topics, preparing a table of specifications, selecting item types, writing items, sequencing items and preparing materials. Specific guidelines are provided for preparing the table of specifications, writing test items, and constructing multiple choice items.
This document discusses various testing techniques for evaluating language skills. It begins by defining tests and explaining their importance for student and teacher feedback, administrative decisions, and curriculum development. It then outlines two major language areas to test - skills (listening, speaking, reading, writing) and components (pronunciation, spelling, vocabulary, grammar, punctuation). Twelve common test types are described in detail, along with their advantages and disadvantages: true/false, multiple choice, essay, completion, matching, table/map conversion, table/map filling, correction, dictation, cloze, rearrangement, and guided paragraph writing. Oral testing techniques like reading aloud, interviews, and picture descriptions are also discussed. The document emphasizes being creative and helping
This document discusses assessment of learning and different types of tests used to evaluate student learning. It describes formative and summative assessments, as well as standardized, criterion-referenced, and norm-referenced tests. The stages of test construction are outlined, including planning, trying out drafts, establishing validity and reliability, and interpreting scores. Guidelines are provided for constructing different types of tests such as objective, essay, and recognition tests. The advantages and disadvantages of objective and essay tests are also compared.
This document discusses assessment of learning and various testing methods. It describes different types of tests such as objective tests, diagnostic tests, and standardized tests. It also covers test construction including writing test items, establishing validity and reliability, and interpreting test scores. Both the advantages and disadvantages of objective and essay tests are provided. Statistical measures for interpreting test data include frequency distributions, which list scores and the number of individuals achieving each score. Creating grouped frequency distributions can make interpretation easier when there is a wide range of scores.
This document discusses educational technology and audiovisual aids. It defines audiovisual aids as any device used to communicate an idea and provides several purposes of using visual aids such as challenging students' attention and facilitating understanding. The document also covers different types of visual aids including demonstrations and pictures. It discusses intrinsic and extrinsic classification of devices and different types of tests including essay, objective, and recognition tests. It provides tips for constructing various test types and interpreting test score data through measures like frequency distribution.
Presentation regarding the definition of identification test; advantages & disadvantages; suggestions on how to make good tests.
Disclaimer: I do not claim ownership of the photos used in this slideshow.
The document discusses guidelines for writing different types of objective test items:
1. True-false, matching, and multiple choice items are commonly used selection item types. Suggestions are provided for writing each type to ensure items are unambiguous and test the intended objectives.
2. Supply item types like fill-in-the-blank require students to provide short answers. Guidelines emphasize writing clear, unambiguous items that test recall of important content.
3. Advantages and disadvantages of each item type are outlined. The summary concludes by providing general guidelines for writing test items that validly assess learning objectives without ambiguity or trick questions.
This lesson, along with the succeeding ones, will all be about making / writing effective objective-type tests. In this presentation, the pre-service teacher will equip himself/herself with the needed knowledge to write short-answer and completion type test items.
This document provides guidelines for constructing paper-and-pencil tests. It discusses general principles of testing such as measuring instructional objectives and ensuring validity and reliability. It also describes attributes of a good test, including validity, reliability, objectivity, scorability and administrability. The steps in constructing classroom tests are identified as identifying objectives, listing topics, preparing a table of specifications, selecting item types, writing items, sequencing items and preparing materials. Specific guidelines are provided for preparing the table of specifications, writing test items, and constructing multiple choice items.
This document discusses various testing techniques for evaluating language skills. It begins by defining tests and explaining their importance for student and teacher feedback, administrative decisions, and curriculum development. It then outlines two major language areas to test - skills (listening, speaking, reading, writing) and components (pronunciation, spelling, vocabulary, grammar, punctuation). Twelve common test types are described in detail, along with their advantages and disadvantages: true/false, multiple choice, essay, completion, matching, table/map conversion, table/map filling, correction, dictation, cloze, rearrangement, and guided paragraph writing. Oral testing techniques like reading aloud, interviews, and picture descriptions are also discussed. The document emphasizes being creative and helping
The document discusses matching type tests, which measure a learner's ability to identify relationships between sets of items. A matching type test presents two columns, with the first column (premises) numbered and the second column (responses) labeled with capital letters. It is effective for content with parallel concepts and can measure knowledge of terms and definitions, objects and labels, causes and effects, and other relationships. Advantages are objective measurement and comparing ideas, but it may overestimate learning due to guessing and be limited to lower understanding levels. The document provides rules for constructing matching type tests, such as putting more words in column A, arranging column B logically, using numbers for column A and letters for column B, and avoiding patterns in correct
Test items can be designed in various formats, with different formats having more validity and reliability than a single format like multiple choice. Common test formats include questions about reading or listening passages, true/false statements requiring evidence, multiple choice, fill-in-the-blank, matching, dictation, sentence rewriting, translation, and essay writing. Well-designed tests use a variety of formats to comprehensively assess different skills.
Chapter 6: Writing Objective Test Items
1) What is an objective test items?
2) Examples of an objective test items
a) True or False
• Advantages & Disadvantages
• Suggestions for writing true or false test items
b) Matching Type
• Advantages & Disadvantages
• Suggestions for writing matching type test items
c) Multiple Choice
• Advantages & Disadvantages
• Suggestions for writing multiple choice test items
d) Completion Test
• Advantages & Disadvantages
• Suggestions for writing completion test items
3) Guidelines for writing test items
This document discusses various topics related to assessment of learning including measurement, evaluation, types of tests, constructing tests, and interpreting test results. It provides definitions and examples of key terms. The main points are:
1. Measurement refers to the quantitative aspect of evaluation and involves outcomes that can be measured statistically, while evaluation is the qualitative aspect and involves value judgments.
2. There are various types of tests classified by response method, preparation method, nature of answers, and purpose. Objective tests aim to be free from personal bias by having definite answers.
3. Constructing good tests requires considering validity, reliability, objectivity and other criteria. Standardized tests have established norms while teacher-made tests are based on
This document provides an overview of subjective tests, which require students to write out original answers in response to questions. It focuses on short answer questions and essay tests. Short answer questions are open-ended questions that require brief responses to assess basic knowledge. Essay tests allow for longer written responses to assess higher-level thinking. Both have advantages like measuring complex learning, but also disadvantages like subjectivity and difficulty in scoring responses. The document provides guidance on constructing effective short answer questions and essay prompts to reduce subjectivity.
This document discusses guidelines for constructing various assessment tools, including true-false tests, multiple choice tests, matching tests, and essays. For true-false tests, it provides tips like avoiding absolute terms and trick questions. For multiple choice, it recommends making distractors plausible and consistent with the stem. Matching tests involve matching items in two columns; guidelines include using capital letters and ensuring fewer responses than premises. When constructing essays, the document advises providing clear directions and criteria for grading.
The document discusses two types of tests: subjective and objective. Subjective tests usually involve essay or brief answer questions where the teacher expects particular information in the student's response. Objective tests require selecting the correct answer from multiple choices or matching questions. The document provides examples of different types of subjective questions like short essays, phrases, and long essays. It also lists various verbs that may be used as cues in essay questions like analyze, compare, contrast, define, describe, and evaluate. Sample objective test questions include true/false, sentence completion, and multiple choice. The document concludes with tips for preparing for both essay and objective tests.
The document did not contain any text to summarize. Summarizing requires analyzing the content and ideas within a document to extract the most important and relevant information, but this document only contained the letters "WR" and did not provide enough context for a meaningful summary.
Topic: Constructing Objective and Subjective Test
Student Name: Munazza Samo
Class: B.Ed. Hons Elementary Part (II)
Project Name: “Young Teachers' Professional Development (TPD)"
"Project Founder: Prof. Dr. Amjad Ali Arain
Faculty of Education, University of Sindh, Pakistan
The document provides information on different types of assessment tools:
1) Multiple choice tests, true/false tests, matching tests, completion tests, cloze tests, and essay tests. Advantages and disadvantages of each type are discussed.
2) Guidance is given on writing questions for each test type, including pointers on style, structure, and content.
3) References are provided on assessment and measuring student learning outcomes. The document aims to help in developing different assessment tools.
This document discusses best practices for testing and evaluation in language learning. It provides guidance on developing valid and reliable test items that accurately assess learners' abilities. Test methods should use clear, unambiguous questions and include multiple choice, cloze tests, summaries, and other techniques. When developing items, test creators should avoid ambiguity and ensure each item only tests one thing. They should also consider including options that are not exactly the same but still plausible as distractors.
Chapter 6: Writing Objective Test Items
1) What is an objective test items?
2) Examples of an objective test items
a) True or False
• Advantages & Disadvantages
• Suggestions for writing true or false test items
b) Matching Type
• Advantages & Disadvantages
• Suggestions for writing matching type test items
c) Multiple Choice
• Advantages & Disadvantages
• Suggestions for writing multiple choice test items
d) Completion Test
• Advantages & Disadvantages
• Suggestions for writing completion test items
3) Guidelines for writing test items
Item writing involves 8 key steps: 1) defining what is to be measured, 2) generating an item pool, 3) avoiding long items, 4) considering reading level, 5) avoiding double-barreled items, 6) mixing positively and negatively worded items, 7) considering cultural sensitivity, and 8) realizing items become obsolete. There are several item formats including dichotomous (true/false), polytomous (multiple choice), Likert scales, category scales, checklists, and Q-sorts. Each format has advantages and disadvantages for assessing different traits like knowledge, attitudes, or personalities. Careful item writing following best practices can help ensure accurate assessment of test takers.
Rc for student_enhance_learning_-_mooreChris Cooke
The document provides guidance on creating multiple choice questions for reading comprehension tests, including considerations for text and question difficulty. It recommends including three levels of text complexity and questions that range in difficulty based on Bloom's Taxonomy. It also provides strategies for students to effectively take the test, such as reading questions before the text, tracking with their finger, making notes, using context clues for unfamiliar words, and reviewing answers.
The document provides guidance on creating multiple choice questions for reading comprehension tests, including considerations for text and question difficulty. It recommends including three levels of text complexity and questions that range in difficulty based on Bloom's Taxonomy. It also outlines test structure, suggesting 7-10 texts with 18-21 minutes per text. Additional sections provide strategies for students to effectively approach and complete the exam.
Objective tests are tests where the scoring does not vary between examiners or over time. The answers are either correct or incorrect, with no partial credit. There are different types of objective test questions including recall, recognition, and context dependent. Objective tests have several merits such as allowing for extensive sampling of topics, objective scoring, saving time, and eliminating irrelevant factors from affecting scores. However, they also have limitations such as not being able to evaluate all objectives and the possibility of guessing answers correctly. The validity and reliability of objective tests can be improved by avoiding difficult words and clues to answers in questions.
The document discusses objective vs subjective testing and provides guidelines for developing effective multiple choice questions. Objective tests measure skills that can be scored as right or wrong, while subjective tests require evaluator interpretation. Well-constructed multiple choice questions should have a clear and concise stem, one unambiguously correct answer, and plausible distractors. Both objective and subjective assessments are useful for teaching and evaluating different language skills.
The document discusses guidelines for constructing and scoring completion and essay type tests. It provides examples of completion tests involving filling in blanks with words, letters, or phrases. Essay tests are described as allowing for assessment of higher-order thinking by requiring students to organize their thoughts in writing. The document outlines objectives, types, and rules for scoring essays, including specifying criteria, maintaining anonymity, and having multiple graders to reduce bias.
Educational Assessment and Evaluation (Constructing Objective Test Items)HennaAnsari
This document discusses objective test items and their construction and evaluation. It defines objective tests as those that can be scored objectively without relying on subjective judgment. Objective items include multiple choice, true/false, matching, and short answer questions. When constructing objective items, clear learning objectives, thorough subject knowledge, and an understanding of students is important. Objective tests have advantages like objective scoring but are limited in their ability to measure complex skills. The document provides guidelines for constructing and evaluating high-quality objective test items.
This document discusses various concepts related to educational measurement and testing. It defines key terms like measurement, evaluation, tests, validity, reliability, and different types of tests. It provides details on constructing objective tests, including writing test items, establishing test validity and reliability, and interpreting test scores. It also discusses advantages and disadvantages of objective and essay tests. Additionally, it covers topics like measures of central tendency, frequency distributions, and calculating the mean, median and mode.
This document discusses assessment of learning and provides information on different types of tests used to evaluate student learning. It defines key terms related to assessment such as measurement, evaluation, formative and summative tests. The document also outlines classifications of tests, criteria for developing good exams, considerations in test construction, and pointers for constructing and scoring different types of tests such as recall, recognition, true-false and essay questions.
The document discusses matching type tests, which measure a learner's ability to identify relationships between sets of items. A matching type test presents two columns, with the first column (premises) numbered and the second column (responses) labeled with capital letters. It is effective for content with parallel concepts and can measure knowledge of terms and definitions, objects and labels, causes and effects, and other relationships. Advantages are objective measurement and comparing ideas, but it may overestimate learning due to guessing and be limited to lower understanding levels. The document provides rules for constructing matching type tests, such as putting more words in column A, arranging column B logically, using numbers for column A and letters for column B, and avoiding patterns in correct
Test items can be designed in various formats, with different formats having more validity and reliability than a single format like multiple choice. Common test formats include questions about reading or listening passages, true/false statements requiring evidence, multiple choice, fill-in-the-blank, matching, dictation, sentence rewriting, translation, and essay writing. Well-designed tests use a variety of formats to comprehensively assess different skills.
Chapter 6: Writing Objective Test Items
1) What is an objective test items?
2) Examples of an objective test items
a) True or False
• Advantages & Disadvantages
• Suggestions for writing true or false test items
b) Matching Type
• Advantages & Disadvantages
• Suggestions for writing matching type test items
c) Multiple Choice
• Advantages & Disadvantages
• Suggestions for writing multiple choice test items
d) Completion Test
• Advantages & Disadvantages
• Suggestions for writing completion test items
3) Guidelines for writing test items
This document discusses various topics related to assessment of learning including measurement, evaluation, types of tests, constructing tests, and interpreting test results. It provides definitions and examples of key terms. The main points are:
1. Measurement refers to the quantitative aspect of evaluation and involves outcomes that can be measured statistically, while evaluation is the qualitative aspect and involves value judgments.
2. There are various types of tests classified by response method, preparation method, nature of answers, and purpose. Objective tests aim to be free from personal bias by having definite answers.
3. Constructing good tests requires considering validity, reliability, objectivity and other criteria. Standardized tests have established norms while teacher-made tests are based on
This document provides an overview of subjective tests, which require students to write out original answers in response to questions. It focuses on short answer questions and essay tests. Short answer questions are open-ended questions that require brief responses to assess basic knowledge. Essay tests allow for longer written responses to assess higher-level thinking. Both have advantages like measuring complex learning, but also disadvantages like subjectivity and difficulty in scoring responses. The document provides guidance on constructing effective short answer questions and essay prompts to reduce subjectivity.
This document discusses guidelines for constructing various assessment tools, including true-false tests, multiple choice tests, matching tests, and essays. For true-false tests, it provides tips like avoiding absolute terms and trick questions. For multiple choice, it recommends making distractors plausible and consistent with the stem. Matching tests involve matching items in two columns; guidelines include using capital letters and ensuring fewer responses than premises. When constructing essays, the document advises providing clear directions and criteria for grading.
The document discusses two types of tests: subjective and objective. Subjective tests usually involve essay or brief answer questions where the teacher expects particular information in the student's response. Objective tests require selecting the correct answer from multiple choices or matching questions. The document provides examples of different types of subjective questions like short essays, phrases, and long essays. It also lists various verbs that may be used as cues in essay questions like analyze, compare, contrast, define, describe, and evaluate. Sample objective test questions include true/false, sentence completion, and multiple choice. The document concludes with tips for preparing for both essay and objective tests.
The document did not contain any text to summarize. Summarizing requires analyzing the content and ideas within a document to extract the most important and relevant information, but this document only contained the letters "WR" and did not provide enough context for a meaningful summary.
Topic: Constructing Objective and Subjective Test
Student Name: Munazza Samo
Class: B.Ed. Hons Elementary Part (II)
Project Name: “Young Teachers' Professional Development (TPD)"
"Project Founder: Prof. Dr. Amjad Ali Arain
Faculty of Education, University of Sindh, Pakistan
The document provides information on different types of assessment tools:
1) Multiple choice tests, true/false tests, matching tests, completion tests, cloze tests, and essay tests. Advantages and disadvantages of each type are discussed.
2) Guidance is given on writing questions for each test type, including pointers on style, structure, and content.
3) References are provided on assessment and measuring student learning outcomes. The document aims to help in developing different assessment tools.
This document discusses best practices for testing and evaluation in language learning. It provides guidance on developing valid and reliable test items that accurately assess learners' abilities. Test methods should use clear, unambiguous questions and include multiple choice, cloze tests, summaries, and other techniques. When developing items, test creators should avoid ambiguity and ensure each item only tests one thing. They should also consider including options that are not exactly the same but still plausible as distractors.
Chapter 6: Writing Objective Test Items
1) What is an objective test items?
2) Examples of an objective test items
a) True or False
• Advantages & Disadvantages
• Suggestions for writing true or false test items
b) Matching Type
• Advantages & Disadvantages
• Suggestions for writing matching type test items
c) Multiple Choice
• Advantages & Disadvantages
• Suggestions for writing multiple choice test items
d) Completion Test
• Advantages & Disadvantages
• Suggestions for writing completion test items
3) Guidelines for writing test items
Item writing involves 8 key steps: 1) defining what is to be measured, 2) generating an item pool, 3) avoiding long items, 4) considering reading level, 5) avoiding double-barreled items, 6) mixing positively and negatively worded items, 7) considering cultural sensitivity, and 8) realizing items become obsolete. There are several item formats including dichotomous (true/false), polytomous (multiple choice), Likert scales, category scales, checklists, and Q-sorts. Each format has advantages and disadvantages for assessing different traits like knowledge, attitudes, or personalities. Careful item writing following best practices can help ensure accurate assessment of test takers.
Rc for student_enhance_learning_-_mooreChris Cooke
The document provides guidance on creating multiple choice questions for reading comprehension tests, including considerations for text and question difficulty. It recommends including three levels of text complexity and questions that range in difficulty based on Bloom's Taxonomy. It also provides strategies for students to effectively take the test, such as reading questions before the text, tracking with their finger, making notes, using context clues for unfamiliar words, and reviewing answers.
The document provides guidance on creating multiple choice questions for reading comprehension tests, including considerations for text and question difficulty. It recommends including three levels of text complexity and questions that range in difficulty based on Bloom's Taxonomy. It also outlines test structure, suggesting 7-10 texts with 18-21 minutes per text. Additional sections provide strategies for students to effectively approach and complete the exam.
Objective tests are tests where the scoring does not vary between examiners or over time. The answers are either correct or incorrect, with no partial credit. There are different types of objective test questions including recall, recognition, and context dependent. Objective tests have several merits such as allowing for extensive sampling of topics, objective scoring, saving time, and eliminating irrelevant factors from affecting scores. However, they also have limitations such as not being able to evaluate all objectives and the possibility of guessing answers correctly. The validity and reliability of objective tests can be improved by avoiding difficult words and clues to answers in questions.
The document discusses objective vs subjective testing and provides guidelines for developing effective multiple choice questions. Objective tests measure skills that can be scored as right or wrong, while subjective tests require evaluator interpretation. Well-constructed multiple choice questions should have a clear and concise stem, one unambiguously correct answer, and plausible distractors. Both objective and subjective assessments are useful for teaching and evaluating different language skills.
The document discusses guidelines for constructing and scoring completion and essay type tests. It provides examples of completion tests involving filling in blanks with words, letters, or phrases. Essay tests are described as allowing for assessment of higher-order thinking by requiring students to organize their thoughts in writing. The document outlines objectives, types, and rules for scoring essays, including specifying criteria, maintaining anonymity, and having multiple graders to reduce bias.
Educational Assessment and Evaluation (Constructing Objective Test Items)HennaAnsari
This document discusses objective test items and their construction and evaluation. It defines objective tests as those that can be scored objectively without relying on subjective judgment. Objective items include multiple choice, true/false, matching, and short answer questions. When constructing objective items, clear learning objectives, thorough subject knowledge, and an understanding of students is important. Objective tests have advantages like objective scoring but are limited in their ability to measure complex skills. The document provides guidelines for constructing and evaluating high-quality objective test items.
This document discusses various concepts related to educational measurement and testing. It defines key terms like measurement, evaluation, tests, validity, reliability, and different types of tests. It provides details on constructing objective tests, including writing test items, establishing test validity and reliability, and interpreting test scores. It also discusses advantages and disadvantages of objective and essay tests. Additionally, it covers topics like measures of central tendency, frequency distributions, and calculating the mean, median and mode.
This document discusses assessment of learning and provides information on different types of tests used to evaluate student learning. It defines key terms related to assessment such as measurement, evaluation, formative and summative tests. The document also outlines classifications of tests, criteria for developing good exams, considerations in test construction, and pointers for constructing and scoring different types of tests such as recall, recognition, true-false and essay questions.
This document discusses assessment in learning and various types of tests used to evaluate student learning. It describes different ways to classify tests, such as oral versus written tests, and objective versus subjective tests. The document outlines the key characteristics of formative, summative, diagnostic, and standardized tests. It also discusses important criteria for developing good tests, such as validity, reliability, and objectivity. Different scoring methods and statistical measures used to analyze test results are presented, such as frequency distributions and measures of central tendency like the mean.
This document discusses assessment of learning and test construction. It defines key terms like measurement, evaluation, and different types of tests. It also covers test classification systems, criteria for a good test, considerations in test construction like length and formats, and pointers for different test types like recall and recognition. The overall purpose is to provide guidance on developing and using assessment tools to improve the teaching and learning process.
This document discusses assessment of learning and various testing methods. It describes different types of tests such as objective, essay, and standardized tests. It covers test construction including writing test items, establishing validity and reliability. Scoring methods and statistical tools for interpreting test results like frequency distributions are also outlined. The purpose of assessment is to improve the teaching and learning process through measuring student outcomes.
This document discusses various types of educational tests and assessments. It defines different types of test items such as true/false, matching, and essay questions. It also covers topics like developing test objectives, writing clear questions, scoring responses, and analyzing results. Additionally, it outlines the advantages and disadvantages of both objective and essay style exams in evaluating student learning.
This document discusses various topics related to assessment of learning, including the key differences between measurement, evaluation, and testing. It also covers different types of tests such as subjective/essay tests, objective tests, teacher-made tests, diagnostic tests, formative tests, and summative tests. The document provides information on standardized tests, norms, criterion-referenced measures, and norm-referenced measures. It discusses important criteria for good examinations like validity, reliability, and objectivity. It also outlines the stages of test construction and major considerations when preparing a test.
Assessment of learning focuses on developing and using assessment tools to improve the teaching and learning process. It emphasizes using tests to measure knowledge and thinking skills. Students will learn to create rubrics for performance and portfolio assessments. There are various types of tests classified by response format, preparation method, answer nature, and purpose. Proper test construction considers objectives, sampling, item format, scoring, and other validation criteria. Data from tests is interpreted using measures of central tendency, dispersion, and other statistical tools.
Different types of Test
Why do We give tests?
Kinds of tests
Other categories of tests
Two Types of Test (Questions)
Subjective Test Samples
Essay
Types of Essay Items
Matching type
Completion Type
This document discusses different types of tests used to assess student learning, including essay tests, objective tests, and matching tests. Essay tests require students to write longer responses to demonstrate their understanding. Objective tests include multiple choice, true/false, and identification questions that can be scored objectively. Matching tests assess a student's ability to link related items, such as terms and definitions. The document provides guidelines for writing different types of test questions and considerations for ensuring the questions are clear, concise, and accurately measure the intended learning outcomes.
This document discusses different types of tests including true/false, short answer, essay, and matching tests. It provides details on each type, including guidelines for constructing them and advantages/disadvantages. True/false tests can assess basic knowledge but have high guessing rates. Short answer tests reduce guessing and assess lower-level thinking but are time-consuming to score. Essay tests measure higher-order skills but are difficult to score reliably. Matching tests are easy to construct and score but often assess trivial information. Proper construction and clear guidelines are important for all test types.
This document discusses various topics related to educational assessment and testing. It defines key terms like audiovisual aids, formative and summative assessment. It describes different types of tests like achievement tests and diagnostic tests. It also covers test construction including writing test items, establishing validity and reliability. Statistical measures for interpreting test scores are explained, such as measures of central tendency (mean, median, mode) and measures of dispersion (range, variance, standard deviation). Graphing distributions is also mentioned.
This document discusses various topics related to educational assessment and testing. It defines key terms like audiovisual aids, formative and summative assessment. It describes different types of tests like achievement tests and diagnostic tests. It also covers test construction including writing test items, establishing validity and reliability. Statistical measures for interpreting test scores are explained, such as measures of central tendency (mean, median, mode) and measures of dispersion (range, variance, standard deviation). Graphing distributions is also mentioned.
This document discusses educational technology and assessment of learning. It defines audiovisual aids and their purposes in aiding communication and teaching. It describes different types of visual aids, tests, and measurements used in assessment. These include traditional visual aids like pictures and models, as well as types of tests based on response, preparation, answers, and measurements like frequency distributions that are used to interpret test score data.
The document discusses various topics related to educational assessment including types of tests, constructing and interpreting tests, and statistical analysis of test results. It describes different types of tests such as objective tests, essay tests, and standardized tests. It provides guidance on constructing tests including writing test items, determining test length and formats, and establishing validity and reliability. It also explains how to interpret test scores using measures of central tendency like mean, median and mode as well as measures of dispersion like range, variance and standard deviation. Frequency distributions and graphs are presented as ways to visualize distributions of test scores.
The document discusses guidelines for constructing traditional tests, including choosing a test format, categories of tests, and how to construct items for multiple choice, true/false, matching, short answer, and essay tests. It provides examples of assessment plans that identify learning outcomes, topics, and appropriate test types. The document instructs to develop a sample three-part test by identifying learning outcomes, cognitive skills, suitable format, and test specifications.
Survey and interview are possible methods to collect data on job satisfaction. A survey or interview could ask respondents questions to determine their level of satisfaction with various aspects of their job in a structured way. Observations alone may not provide insight into peoples' subjective experiences of satisfaction.
This document discusses objective tests, including what they are, their categories and types. Objective tests are those where the scoring rules do not allow for subjective judgments. They have selected and constructed response formats. Some common types are true/false, multiple choice, matching, fill-in-the-blank, and labeling. Objective tests are easier to score objectively but can only measure factual knowledge directly. They require careful construction to be effective.
This document discusses strategies for constructing effective multiple choice and essay exam questions. For multiple choice questions, key points include writing clear stems that present definite problems, using plausible distractors, and maintaining parallel structure in the alternatives. For essay questions, the document recommends designing questions to assess higher-order thinking, providing grading criteria, and using both extended and restricted response questions. The advantages of essay questions include allowing for complex reasoning, but they are more time-consuming to score and can disadvantage poor writers.
Gender and Mental Health - Counselling and Family Therapy Applications and In...PsychoTech Services
A proprietary approach developed by bringing together the best of learning theories from Psychology, design principles from the world of visualization, and pedagogical methods from over a decade of training experience, that enables you to: Learn better, faster!
A Visual Guide to 1 Samuel | A Tale of Two HeartsSteve Thomason
These slides walk through the story of 1 Samuel. Samuel is the last judge of Israel. The people reject God and want a king. Saul is anointed as the first king, but he is not a good king. David, the shepherd boy is anointed and Saul is envious of him. David shows honor while Saul continues to self destruct.
LAND USE LAND COVER AND NDVI OF MIRZAPUR DISTRICT, UPRAHUL
This Dissertation explores the particular circumstances of Mirzapur, a region located in the
core of India. Mirzapur, with its varied terrains and abundant biodiversity, offers an optimal
environment for investigating the changes in vegetation cover dynamics. Our study utilizes
advanced technologies such as GIS (Geographic Information Systems) and Remote sensing to
analyze the transformations that have taken place over the course of a decade.
The complex relationship between human activities and the environment has been the focus
of extensive research and worry. As the global community grapples with swift urbanization,
population expansion, and economic progress, the effects on natural ecosystems are becoming
more evident. A crucial element of this impact is the alteration of vegetation cover, which plays a
significant role in maintaining the ecological equilibrium of our planet.Land serves as the foundation for all human activities and provides the necessary materials for
these activities. As the most crucial natural resource, its utilization by humans results in different
'Land uses,' which are determined by both human activities and the physical characteristics of the
land.
The utilization of land is impacted by human needs and environmental factors. In countries
like India, rapid population growth and the emphasis on extensive resource exploitation can lead
to significant land degradation, adversely affecting the region's land cover.
Therefore, human intervention has significantly influenced land use patterns over many
centuries, evolving its structure over time and space. In the present era, these changes have
accelerated due to factors such as agriculture and urbanization. Information regarding land use and
cover is essential for various planning and management tasks related to the Earth's surface,
providing crucial environmental data for scientific, resource management, policy purposes, and
diverse human activities.
Accurate understanding of land use and cover is imperative for the development planning
of any area. Consequently, a wide range of professionals, including earth system scientists, land
and water managers, and urban planners, are interested in obtaining data on land use and cover
changes, conversion trends, and other related patterns. The spatial dimensions of land use and
cover support policymakers and scientists in making well-informed decisions, as alterations in
these patterns indicate shifts in economic and social conditions. Monitoring such changes with the
help of Advanced technologies like Remote Sensing and Geographic Information Systems is
crucial for coordinated efforts across different administrative levels. Advanced technologies like
Remote Sensing and Geographic Information Systems
9
Changes in vegetation cover refer to variations in the distribution, composition, and overall
structure of plant communities across different temporal and spatial scales. These changes can
occur natural.
Temple of Asclepius in Thrace. Excavation resultsKrassimira Luka
The temple and the sanctuary around were dedicated to Asklepios Zmidrenus. This name has been known since 1875 when an inscription dedicated to him was discovered in Rome. The inscription is dated in 227 AD and was left by soldiers originating from the city of Philippopolis (modern Plovdiv).
This presentation was provided by Rebecca Benner, Ph.D., of the American Society of Anesthesiologists, for the second session of NISO's 2024 Training Series "DEIA in the Scholarly Landscape." Session Two: 'Expanding Pathways to Publishing Careers,' was held June 13, 2024.
How to Make a Field Mandatory in Odoo 17Celine George
In Odoo, making a field required can be done through both Python code and XML views. When you set the required attribute to True in Python code, it makes the field required across all views where it's used. Conversely, when you set the required attribute in XML views, it makes the field required only in the context of that particular view.
ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 42001, and GDPR: Best Practices for Implementation and...PECB
Denis is a dynamic and results-driven Chief Information Officer (CIO) with a distinguished career spanning information systems analysis and technical project management. With a proven track record of spearheading the design and delivery of cutting-edge Information Management solutions, he has consistently elevated business operations, streamlined reporting functions, and maximized process efficiency.
Certified as an ISO/IEC 27001: Information Security Management Systems (ISMS) Lead Implementer, Data Protection Officer, and Cyber Risks Analyst, Denis brings a heightened focus on data security, privacy, and cyber resilience to every endeavor.
His expertise extends across a diverse spectrum of reporting, database, and web development applications, underpinned by an exceptional grasp of data storage and virtualization technologies. His proficiency in application testing, database administration, and data cleansing ensures seamless execution of complex projects.
What sets Denis apart is his comprehensive understanding of Business and Systems Analysis technologies, honed through involvement in all phases of the Software Development Lifecycle (SDLC). From meticulous requirements gathering to precise analysis, innovative design, rigorous development, thorough testing, and successful implementation, he has consistently delivered exceptional results.
Throughout his career, he has taken on multifaceted roles, from leading technical project management teams to owning solutions that drive operational excellence. His conscientious and proactive approach is unwavering, whether he is working independently or collaboratively within a team. His ability to connect with colleagues on a personal level underscores his commitment to fostering a harmonious and productive workplace environment.
Date: May 29, 2024
Tags: Information Security, ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 42001, Artificial Intelligence, GDPR
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Find out more about ISO training and certification services
Training: ISO/IEC 27001 Information Security Management System - EN | PECB
ISO/IEC 42001 Artificial Intelligence Management System - EN | PECB
General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) - Training Courses - EN | PECB
Webinars: https://pecb.com/webinars
Article: https://pecb.com/article
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For more information about PECB:
Website: https://pecb.com/
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/pecb/
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/PECBInternational/
Slideshare: http://www.slideshare.net/PECBCERTIFICATION
How to Setup Warehouse & Location in Odoo 17 InventoryCeline George
In this slide, we'll explore how to set up warehouses and locations in Odoo 17 Inventory. This will help us manage our stock effectively, track inventory levels, and streamline warehouse operations.
This document provides an overview of wound healing, its functions, stages, mechanisms, factors affecting it, and complications.
A wound is a break in the integrity of the skin or tissues, which may be associated with disruption of the structure and function.
Healing is the body’s response to injury in an attempt to restore normal structure and functions.
Healing can occur in two ways: Regeneration and Repair
There are 4 phases of wound healing: hemostasis, inflammation, proliferation, and remodeling. This document also describes the mechanism of wound healing. Factors that affect healing include infection, uncontrolled diabetes, poor nutrition, age, anemia, the presence of foreign bodies, etc.
Complications of wound healing like infection, hyperpigmentation of scar, contractures, and keloid formation.
2. ASSESSMENT OF LEARNING
Focuses on the development and utilization of
assessment tools to improve the teaching-learning
process.
It emphasizes on the use of testing for measuring
knowledge, comprehension and other thinking skills .
3. MEASUREMENT
Refers to the quantitative aspect of evaluation. It
involves outcomes that can be quantified statistically.
EVALUATION
Is the qualitative aspect of determining the
outcomes of learning. It involves value judgment .
TEST
Consist of questions or exercises or other devices
from measuring the outcomes of learning.
4. CLASSIFICATION OF TESTS
1. According to manner of response
a. Oral
b. Written
2. According to method of preparation
a. Subjective/essay
b. Objective
3. According to nature of answer
a. Personality tests
b. Intelligence test
c. Aptitude test
d. Achievement or summative test
e. Sociometric test
f. Diagnostic or formative test
g. Trade or vocational test
5. Objective tests are tests which have definite answers
and therefore are not subject to personal bias.
Teacher-made tests or educational tests are
constructed by the teachers based on the contents of
different subjects taught.
Diagnostic tests are used to measure a student’s
strengths and weaknesses, usually to identify
deficiencies in skills or performance.
Formative and summative are terms often used with
evaluation, they may also be used with testing.
Standardized tests are already valid, reliable and
objective.
6. Standards or norms are the goals to be achieved
expressed in terms of the average performance of
the population tests.
Criterion-referenced measure is a measuring
device with a predetermined level of success or
standard on the part of the test-takers.
Norm-referenced measure is a test that is scored
on the basis of the norm or standard level of
accomplishment by the whole group taking the test.
7. CRITERIA OF A GOOD EXAMINATION
Validity refers to the degree to which a test
measures what it is intended to measure.
Reliability pertains to the degree to which a test
measures what it suppose to measure.
Objectivity is the degree to which personal bias is
eliminated in the scoring of the answers.
Nominal scales are the least sophisticated; they
merely classify or events by assigning numbers to
them.
9. DISTINCTION BETWEEN NORM-REFERENCED
AND CRITERION-REFERENCED TESTS
Norm-referenced
interpretation is a relative
interpretation based on
an individual’s position
with respect to some
group, often called the
normative group. Norms
consist of the scores,
usually in some form of
descriptive statistics, of
the normative group.
The concepts of criterion-
referenced testing have
developed with a dual meaning
for criterion-referenced. On one
hand, it means referencing an
individual’s performance to
some criterion that is a defined
performance level. The
individual’s score is interpreted
in absolute rather than relative
terms. The criterion, in this
situation, means some level of
specified performance that has
been determined independently
of how others might perform.
Norm-Referenced Test Criterion-Referenced Test
10. STAGES IN TEST CONSTRUCTION
I. Planning the test
a. Determining the objective
b. Preparing the Table of Specifications
c. Selecting the Appropriate Item Format
d. Writing the Test Items
e. Editing the Test Items
II. Trying out the Test
a. Administering the first Tryout – then Item Analysis
b. Administering the Second Tryout – then Item Analysis
c. Preparing the final Form of the Test
III. Establishing Test Validity
IV. Establishing the Test Reliability
V. Interpreting the Test Score
12. POINTS TO BE CONSIDERED IN PREPARING A TEST
1. Are the instructional objectives clearly defined?
2. What knowledge, skills and attitudes do you want to
measure?
3. Did you prepare a table of specifications?
4. Did you formulate well defined and clear test items?
5. Did you employ correct English in writing the items?
6. Did you avoid giving clues to the correct answer?
7. Did you test the important ideas rather than the
trivial?
8. Did you adapt the test’s difficulty to your student’s
ability?
13. 9. Did you avoid using textbooks jargon?
10. Did you cast the items in positive form?
11. Did you prepare a scoring key?
12. Does each item have a single correct answer?
13. Did you review your items?
14. GENERAL PRINCIPLES IN CONSTRUCTING
DIFFERENT TYPES OF TESTS
The test items should be selected very carefully.
Only important facts should be included.
The test should have extensive sampling of items.
The test items should be carefully expressed in
simple, clear, definite, and meaningful sentences.
There should be only one possible correct response
for each test item.
Each item should be independent. Leading clues to
other items should be avoided.
Lifting sentences from books should not be done to
encourage thinking and understanding.
The first person personal pronouns/and we should
not be used.
15. Various types of test items should be made to avoid
monotony.
Majority of the test items should be of moderate
difficulty. Dew difficult and few easy items should be
included.
The test items should be arranged in an ascending
order of difficulty. Easy items should be at the
beginning to encourage the examinee to pursue the
test and the most difficult items should be at the end.
Clear, concise, and complete directions should
precede all types of test. Sample test items may be
provided for expected responses.
Items which can be answered by previous experience
alone without knowledge of the subject matter should
not be included.
Catchy words should not be used in the test items.
16. Test items must be based upon the objectives of the
course and upon the course content.
The test should measure the degree of achievement
or determine the difficulties of the learners.
The test should emphasize ability to apply and use
facts as well as knowledge of facts.
The test should be of such length that it can be
completed within the time allotted by all or nearly all of
the pupils.
Rules governing good language expression,
grammar, spelling, punctuation, and capitalization
should be observed in all items.
Information on how scoring will be done should be
provided.
Scoring Keys in correcting and scoring tests should
be provided.
17. POINTERS TO BE OBSERVED IN CONSTRUCTING
AND SCORING THE DIFFERENT TUPES OF TESTS
A. RECALL TYPES
1. Simple recall type
a. This type consists of questions calling for a single word or
expression as an answer.
b. Items usually begin with who, where, when, and what.
c. Score is the number of correct answers.
2. Completion type
a. Only important words or phrases should be omitted to avoid
confusion.
b. Blanks should be of equal lengths.
c. The blank, as much as possible, is placed near or at the end of
the sentence.
d. Articles a, an, and the should not be provided before the omitted
word or phrase to avoid clues for answers.
e. Score is the number of correct answers.
18. 3. Enumeration type
a. The exact number of expected answers
should be stated.
b. Blanks should be of equal lengths.
c. Score is the number of correct answers.
d.
4. Identification type
a. The items should make an examinee think
of a word, number, or group of words that would
complete the statement or answer the problem.
b. Score is the number of correct answers.
19. B. RECOGNITION TYPES
1. True-false or alternate-response type
a. Declarative sentences should be used.
b. The number of “true” and “false” items should be more or less
equal.
c. The truth or falsity of the sentence should not be too evident.
d. Negative statements should be avoided.
e. The “modified true-false” is more preferable than the “plain true-
false”.
f. In arranging the items, avoid the regular recurrence of “true” and
“false” statements.
g. Avoid using specific determiners like: all, always, never, none,
nothing, most, often, some, etc. and avoid weak statements as
may, sometimes, as a rule, in general etc.
h. Minimize the use of qualitative terms like: few, great, many, more,
etc.
i. Avoid leading clues to answers in all items.
j. Score is the number of correct answers in “modified true- false
and right answers minus wrong answers in “plain true-false”.
20. 2. Yes-No type
a. The items should be in interrogative sentences. b. The
same rules as in “true-false” are applied.
3. Multiple-response type
a. There should be three to five choices. The number of
choices used in the first item should be the same number of choices
in all the items of this type of test.
b. The choices should be numbered or lettered so that only
the number or letter can be written on the blank provided.
c. If the choices are figures, they should be arranged in
ascending order.
d. Avoid the use of “a” or “an” as the last word prior to the
listing of the responses.
e. Random occurrence of responses should be employed.
f. The choices, as much as possible, should be at the end of
the statements.
g. The choices should be related in some way or should
belong to the same class.
h. Avoid the use of “none of these” as one of the choices.
i. Score is the number of correct answers.
21. 4. Best answer type
a. There should be three to five choices all of which
are right but vary in their degree of merit, importance or
desirability.
b. The other rules for multiple-response items are
applied here.
c. Score is the number of correct answers.
5. Matching type
a. There should be two columns. Under “A” are the
stimuli which should be longer and more descriptive than the
responses under column “B”. The response may be a word, a
phrase, a number, or a formula.
b. The stimuli under column “A” should be numbered
and the responses under column “B” should be lettered.
Answers will be indicated by letters only on lines provided in
column “A”.
c. The number of pairs usually should not exceed
twenty items. Less than ten introduces chance elements.
Twenty pairs may be used but more than twenty is decidedly
wasteful of time.
22. d. The number of responses in column “B” should
be two or more than the number of items in Column “A”
to avoid guessing.
e. Only one correct matching for each item should
be possible.
f. Matching sets should neither be too long nor too
short.
g. All items should be on the same page to avoid
turning of pages in the process of matching pairs.
h. Score is the number of correct answers.
23. C. ESSAY TYPE EXAMINATIONS
Common types of essay questions.(The types are
related to purposes of which the essay examinations are
to be used.)
1. Comparison of two things
2. Explanation of the use or meaning of a
statement or passage.
3. Analysis
4. Decisions for or against
5. Discussion
24. HOW TO CONSTRUCT ESSAY EXAMINATIONS.
1. Determine the objectives or essentials for each
question to be evaluated.
2. Phrase questions in simple, clear and concise
language.
3. Suit the length of the questions to the time available
for answering the essay examination. The teacher
should try to answer the test herself,
4. Scoring:
a. Have a model answer in advance.
b. Indicate the number of points for each question.
c. Score a point for each essential.
25. ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES
OF THE OBJECTIVE TYPE OF TESTS
Advantages
The objective test is free from personal bias in scoring.
It is easy to score. With a scoring key, the test can be
corrected by different individuals without affecting the
accuracy of the grades given.
It has high validity because it is comprehensive with wide
sampling of essentials.
It is less time-consuming since many items can be
answered in a given time.
It is fair to students since the slow writers can accomplish
the test as fast as the fast writers.
26. Disadvantages
It is difficult to construct and requires more time to
prepare.
It does not afford the students the opportunity in training
for self- and thought organization.
It cannot be used to test ability in theme writing or
journalistic writing.
27. ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES
OF THE ESSAY TYPE OF TESTS
Advantages
The essay examination can be used in practically all subjects of
the school curriculum.
It trains students for thought organization and self expression.
It affords students opportunities to express their originality and
independence of thinking.
Only the essay test can be used in some subjects like
composition writing journalistic writing which cannot be tested
the objective type test.
Essay examination measures higher mental abilities
comparison, interpretation, criticism, defense of opinion and
decision.
The essay test is easily prepared.
It is inexpensive.
28. Disadvantages
The limited sampling of items makes the test unreliable
measure of achievements or abilities.
Questions usually are not well prepared.
Scoring is highly subjective due to the influence of the
corrector's personal judgment.
Grading of the essay test is inaccurate measure pupils'
achievements due to subjectivity of scoring.
29. STATISTICAL MEASURES OR TOOLS USED
IN INTERPRETING NUMERICAL DATA
Frequency Distributions
A simple, common sense technique for describing a set of
test scores is through the use of frequency distribution. A
frequency distribution is merely listing of the possible score
values and the number of persons who achieved each
scores. Such an arrangement presents the scores in a
more simple and understandable manner than merely
listing all of the separate scores. Consider a specific set of
scores to clarify these ideas.
30. A set of scores for a group of 25 students who took a
50- item test is listed in Table 1. It is easier to analyze
the scores if they are arranged in a simple frequency
distribution. The steps that are involved in creating
the frequency distribution are:
First, list the possible score values in rank order, from
highest to lowest. Then, a second column indicates the
frequency or number of persons who received each score.
For example, three students received a score of 47, two
received 40, and so forth. There is no need to list score
values below the lowest score that anyone received.
31. Table 1. Scores of 25 Students on a 50-Item Test
Student Score Student Score
A 48 N 43
B 50 O 47
C 46 P 48
D 41 Q 42
E 37 R 44
F 48 S 38
G 38 T 49
H 47 U 34
I 49 V 35
J 44 W 47
K 48 Y 40
L 49 X 48
M 40
32. Table 2. Frequency Distribution of the 25 Scores of Table 1
Score Frequency Score Frequency
50 1 41 1
49 3 40 2
48 5 39 0
47 3 38 2
46 1 37 1
45 0 36 0
44 2 35 1
43 1 34 1
42 1
33. When there is a wide range of scores in a frequency
distribution, the distribution can be quite long , with a lot of
zeros in the column of frequencies. Such a frequency
distribution can make interpretation difficult and confusing.
A grouped frequency distribution would be more
appropriate in this kind of situation. Groups of score values
are listed rather than each separate possible score value.
If we were to change the frequency distribution and Table 2
into a grouped frequency distribution, we might choose
intervals such as 48 -50 , 45 -47, and so forth. The
frequency corresponding to intervals 48 -50 would be 9 (1
+ 3 + 5). The choice of width of the interval is arbitrary, but
it must be the same for all intervals. In addition, it is a good
idea to have an odd-numbered interval width (we used 3
above) so that the midpoint of the interval is a whole
number. This strategy will simplify subsequent graphs at
description of data. The grouped frequency distribution is
presented in Table 3.
34. Table 3. Grouped Frequency Distribution
Score Interval Frequency
48-50 9
45-47 4
42-44 4
39-41 3
36-38 3
33-35 2
Frequency distributions summarize sets of test
scores by listing the number of people who
received each test score. All of the test scores can
be listed separately, or the scores can be grouped
in a frequency distribution.
35. MEASURES OF CENTRAL TENDENCY
Frequency distributions are helpful for indicating the
shape to describe a distributions of scores, but we
need more information than the shape to describe a
distribution adequately. We need to know where on
the scale of measurement a distribution is located
and how the scores are dispersed in the distribution.
For the former, we compute measures of central
tendency, and for the latter, we compute measures
of dispersion. Measures of central tendency are
points of the scale of measurement, and they are
representative of how the scores tend to average.
There are three commonly used measures of central
tendency: the mean, the median, and the mode,
but the mean is by far the most widely used .
36. THREE MEASURES OF CENTRAL TENDENCY
The Mean is the arithmetic average
The mean of a set of scores is the arithmetic mean. It is
found by summing the scores and dividing the sum by
the number of scores . The mean is the most commonly
used measure of central tendency because it is easily
understood and is based on all the scores in the set;
hence , it summarizes a lot of information. The formula
of the mean is as follows.
37. Where
𝑥 is the mean,
X is the symbol for score, the Summation operator
N is the number of scores.
For the set of scores in table 1,
38. 𝑥 =
𝑓𝑥 𝑚𝑑𝑝𝑡
𝑛
Where 𝑓𝑥 𝑚𝑑𝑝𝑡 means that the midpoint of the interval
is multiplied by the frequency for that interval. In
computing the mean for the scores in Table 3, using
formula we obtain :
39. The Median Another measure of central tendency is the
median which is the point that divides distribution in half;
that is, half of the scores fall above the median and half of
the scores fall below the median. When there are only a few
scores, the median can often be found by inspection. If
there is an odd number of scores, the middle score is the
median. When there is even a number of scores, the
median is halfway between the two middle scores .
However, when they are tied scores in the middle of the
distribution, or when the scores are in a frequency
distribution, the median may not be so obvious. Consider
again the frequency distribution in Table 2. There were 25
scores in the distribution, so the middle score should be the
median. A straightforward way to find this median is to
augment the frequency distribution with a column of
cumulative frequencies. Cumulative frequencies indicate the
number of scores at or below each score. Table 4 indicates
the cumulative frequencies for the data in Table 2.
40.
41. For example, 7 persons scored at or below a score of
40, and 21 persons scored at or below a score of 48.
To find the median, we need to locate the middle
score in the cumulative frequency column, because
this score is the median. Since there are 25 scores in
the distribution, the middle one is the 13th, a score of
46. Thus, 46 is a median of this distribution; half of
the people scored above 46 and half scored. When
there are ties in the middle of the distribution, there
may be a need to interpolate between scores to get
the exact median. However, such precision is not
needed for most classroom tests. The whole number
closest to the median is usually sufficient.
42. The Mode The measure of central tendency that is
the easiest to find is the mode. The mode is the most
frequently occurring score in the distribution. The
mode of the scores in Table 1 is 48. Five persons had
two scores of 48 and no other score occurred as
often. Each of these three measures of central
tendency - the mean, the median, and the mode
means a legitimate definition of “average”
performance on this test. However, each does
provide different information. The arithmetic average
was 44; half the people scored at or below 46 and
more people received 48 than any other score.
43. When a distribution has a small number of very
extreme scores, though, the median may be a better
definition of central tendency. The mode provides the
least information and is used infrequently as
“average”. The mode can be used with nominal scale
data, just as an indicator of the most frequently
appearing category. The mean, the median, and the
mode all describe central tendency:
The mean is the arithmetic average.
The median divides the distribution in half.
The mode is the most frequent score.
44. MEASURES OF DISPERSION
Measures of central tendency are useful for
summarizing average performance, but they tell us
nothing about how the scores are distributed or
“spread out” around the averages . Two sets of test
scores may have equal measures of central
tendency, but they may differ in other ways. One of
the distributions may have the scores tightly
clustered around the average, and the other
distribution may have scores that are widely
separated. As you may have anticipated, there are
descriptive statistics that measure dispersion, which
also are called measures of variability. These
measures indicate how spread out the scores tend
to be.
45. The Range
The range indicates the difference between the highest
and lowest scores in a distribution. It is simple to calculate,
but it provides limited information. We subtract the lowest
from the highest score and add 1 so that we include both
scores in the spread between them. For the scores of
Table 2, the range is 50 - 34 + 1 = 17.
A problem with using the range is that only the two most
extreme scores are used in this computation. There is no
indication of the spread of scores between highest and
lowest. Measures of dispersion that take into consideration
every score in the distribution are the variance and
standard deviation. The standard deviation is used a
great deal in interpreting scores from standardized tests.
46. The Variance
The variance measures how widely the scores in the
distribution are spread about the mean . In other words,
the variance is the average squared difference between
the scores and the mean. As a formula, it looks like this:
An Equivalent formula, easier to compute is:
The computation of the variance for the scores of Table 1 is
illustrated in Table 5. The data for the students K through V
are omitted to save space, but these values are included in
the column totals and in the computation.
𝑠2 =
( 𝑥 − 𝑥)2
𝑛
𝑠2
=
𝑥2
𝑛
𝑥2
47. THE STANDARD DEVIATION
The standard deviation also indicates how spread
out the scores are, but is expressed in the same
units as original scores. The standard deviation is
computed by finding the square root of the
variance.
𝑠 = 𝑠2
48.
49. To determine the mean:
𝑥 =
1100
25
= 44 .
Then, to determine the variance:
S2 =
(𝑥− 𝑥)2
𝑛
=
570
25
= 22.8
50. GRAPHING DISTRIBUTIONS
A graph of distribution of test course is often better
understood than is the frequency distribution or a mere table of
numbers.
The general pattern of scores, as well as any unique
characteristics of the distribution, can be seen easily in simple
graphs. There are several kinds of graphs that can be used, but
a simple bar graph, or histogram, is as useful as any. The
general shape of the distribution is clear from the graph. Most
of the scores in this distribution are high, at the upper end of the
graph. Such a shape is quite common for the scores of
classroom tests. That is, test scores will be grouped toward the
right end of the measurement scale.
A normal distribution has most of the test scores in the middle
of the distribution and progressively fewer scores toward
extremes. The scores of norm groups are seldom graphed but
they could be if we were concerned about seeing the specific
shape of the distribution of scores. Usually, we know or assume
that the scores are normally distributed.