1. Ground Improvements for Challenging Sites in
Orange County
Compacted Aggregate Piers
(Geopier/Rammed Aggregate Pier)
2. Outline
1. Compacted aggregate pier basics
2. Two Case Studies
• The Park Apartments
• Park Place Apartments
3. Construction QA/QC
4. Questions and Discussion
6. Geopier drill
Geopier Tamper
Skid steer
Mobile crew (4 people, 3 machines)
Rapid installations (30 – 50 per day)
Safe, clean, dry process (no jetting!)
Installation depths up to 30 feet
Geopier GP3™ Construction
7.
8.
9. Engineering Aspects
• Not a foundation system
• Improve near surface soil
• Increased bearing capacities below
foundations and slabs-on-grade
• Reduced settlements
10. Settlement Within Compacted Aggregate Zone
Design based on spring analogy:
Rigid footing: Geopier deflection & matrix soil deflection
Stiff spring (RAP element) takes more load than soft spring (matrix
soil).
11. Use conventional geotechnical analysis
approaches:
Estimate footing-induced stress
(Westergaard, Boussinesq, etc)
Estimate soil compressibility
Traditional elastic or consolidation
design methods.
Add lower zone and upper zone for
total settlement
Settlement Below Aggregate Piers (Lower Zone)
B
2B
HLZ
HUZ
17. The Park Project
• 1500 apartment units on 29-acres
• 4-story wood framed apartment buildings
over 2 levels of partial subterranean parking
(podium)
• Column loads 380 to 1156 KIPS
18. The Park---site conditions
• Relatively flat site
• Historically used for agriculture
• Explored with hollow-stem borings and CPT’s
• Groundwater wells.
• Underlain by deep alluvium
• Interlayered silts, sands, clays
• Groundwater at 15 to 30 feet BGS
19. Geotechnical Issues
• Groundwater below subterranean levels
(5 to 10 feet)
• Reduced bearing capacities
• Differential foundation loads and
differential settlements
20. Alternatives
× Piles infeasible
× Remedial Grading---groundwater
× Matt foundation ($7 million)
Ground improvement---aggregate piers
21. Geopiers at The Park
• 2,400 piers
• 30-inch diameter
• 11 to 13 feet deep
• 50 to 60 working days
• Savings over mat foundation: $3 million
25. Park Place Project
• 980 units on 14-acres
• 4-story wood framed buildings
• 2-levels, partially subterranean,
reinforced concrete parking below
• Column loads: 94 to 807 kips
• Wall loads: <12.5 kips/l.f.
26. Park Place --Site Conditions
• Relatively flat site
• Formerly MARSHLAND (swamps)
• Underlain by PEAT/organic clays, alluvium
• Groundwater at 20 to 30 feet BGS
28. Geotechnical Issues
• Very low bearing capacities
• 4 inches total settlement in alluvium (2 inches
differential)
• Mat foundations infeasible over marsh soils
• Conventional aggregate piers inadequate in
marsh deposits (peat)
29. Geopiers at Park Place
• 4,798 piers
• 24-inch diameter
• 9 to 13 feet deep
• Cement Treated Piers (474)
in MARSH Deposit areas
• Cement Treated Piers---up to 30’ deep
30.
31. Acknowledgements
Project Owner: Irvine Company
Specialty Contractor: Tensar-Geopier (Western Ground
Improvement)
Structural Engineer: HCDA Engineering, Inc.