The document discusses different styles of argumentation including classical oration, Rogerian argumentation, and Toulmin argumentation. Classical oration follows an exordium, narratio, partitio, confirmatio, refutatio, and peroratio structure. Rogerian argumentation acknowledges multiple sides of an issue and reasons to adopt the writer's position. The Toulmin model includes a claim, evidence/reasons, warrant, backing, qualifiers, and conditions of rebuttal.

1. Argument Styles:Notes on Chapter 7, Everything’s an Argument

2. What are these things?Classical OrationRogerian ArgumentationToulmin ArgumentationWarrants

3. The classical oration:Exordium: introNarratio: facts and contextPartitio: Division into claim and key issuesConfirmatio: Support for the claim (logos)Refutatio: Counterarguments Peroratio: Summary

4. A modern version:Intro: Hook, Ethos, ClaimBackground: Necessary context and factsArgument: Logos/pathos to support the claimAlternatives: Counterarguments stated and/or refutedConclusion: Summary, elaborate implications, closing

5. The Rogerian Model:Introduction: describe an issue and demonstrate understanding of multiple sidesContexts: acknowledge situations in which alternative positions may be validWriter’s position: State claim and explain its validity—i.e., logosBenefits to opponent: Reasons to adopt the the writer’s position, conclusion

6. The Toulmin Model:Claims: controversial and debatable: answers the question, “So what’s your point?”Evidence/Reasons: Logos. Warrants: Logical bridge between the claim and the evidence.Backing: Further support for the arguments of the warrant itself.Qualifiers: Limit the scope of the claimConditions of rebuttal: Counterarguments

7. Warrant

8. Restriction

9. Backing