Download to read offline
Uploaded byDana Chisnell
Anywhere Ballot iterations
The document summarizes usability testing done on prototypes for an "Anywhere Ballot" system that would allow voters to vote from any device on any ballot. It describes iterations of paper and digital prototypes that were tested with participants over multiple days, with the goal of designing an accessible election experience. The testing resulted in a responsive digital ballot prototype that is accessible, focuses on ballot marking, can be used on various devices, and produces a verifiable paper ballot to address security concerns.
More Related Content
Similar to Anywhere Ballot iterations
Anywhere Ballot iterations
- 1. Usability testing Anywhere Ballot: before& after University of Baltimore Drew Davies Dana Chisnell Kathryn Summers Megan McKeever
- 2. Premise Everyone should voteon the same ballot
- 3.
- 4. How might wedesign an accessible election experience for everyone? Open IDEO AVTI workshops in 2012
- 5. What if youcould vote anywhere, any time, on any device?
- 6. Effective Designs for theAdministration of Elections, 2007 Design for Democracy
- 7. NIST IR 7556 Report:Language of Instructions on Ballots, 2008 Redish, Chisnell, Newby, Laskowski, & Lowry
- 8. NIST medium complexity ballot modified,slightly 18 pages
- 9. Paper prototype 18 participants 4days 16 versions
- 10. Digital prototype 15 participants 3days 3-4 versions
- 11.
- 12.
- 13.
- 14.
- 15.
- 16. How to vote, finaldigital
- 17.
- 18.
- 19.
- 20.
- 21.
- 22.
- 23.
- 24.
- 25.
- 26.
- 27.
- 28.
- 29.
- 30.
- 31.
- 32.
- 33.
- 34.
- 35.
- 36.
- 37.
- 38.
- 39.
- 40.
- 41.
- 42.
- 43.
- 44.
- 45.
- 46.
- 47.
- 48.
- 49.
- 50.
- 51.
- 52.
- 53.
- 54.
- 55.
- 56.
- 57.
- 58. Iteration 1, scrolleddown (page 2)
- 59. Iteration 1, scrolleddown (page 3)
- 60. Iteration 1, scrolledto the end
- 61.
- 62.
- 63.
- 64.
- 65.
- 66.
- 67.
- 68.
- 69.
- 70.
- 71.
- 72.
- 73.
- 74.
- 75.
- 76.
- 77.
- 78.
- 79.
- 80.
- 81.
- 82. 2 prototypes 33 participants 7days 20+ versions
- 83. Responsive good for devices goodfor UOCAVA good for accessibility standards
- 84. Prevents user errors errormanagement typed write-in helps voters see impact of straight- party voting
- 85. Focuses on ballot marking connectto any EMS output in an appropriate format
- 86. Can run onCOTS devices more accessible (own pointer, own screen reader) software independent
- 87. Not “voting overthe Internet” assume appropriate election system can produce printed ballot to cast logic is local (no trips to the server)
- 88. Anywhere ballot designed tobe responsive to different formats works on any device accessible for voters with disabilities
- 89. How can itbe part of a secure, verifiable election system? Who will it help? How will it help them? What voter need does it meet?