cloud-based software (Google Docs) used to do anonymous peer review - results and sample documents for the process

1. Perceptions of Peer Review
Using
Cloud-based Software
By Gjoa Andrichuk
@gandrich
@ICICTE2016
Rhodes, Greece
July 08, 2016
1

2. Perceptions of Peer Review
Using
Cloud-based Software
By Gjoa Andrichuk
@gandrich
@AACE2016
Vancouver, BC
June 29, 2016
2

3. Bring intro for moderator and props
3

4. 4

5. 5

6. “Coming into the program, I
thought I was a pretty good
writer...
6
http://applenapps.com/app-updates/despicable-me-minion-
rush-keeps-running-with-el-machos-lair.html#.VyJNAvkrKM8
Question 6

7. “…Obtaining a BA in
[department] from UBC
involved writing countless
papers (and many sleepless
nights)…”
7
Question 6

8. “…I honestly didn’t think
there was much left for me to
learn, or even improve upon
in terms of my writing ability.
…”
8
Question 6

9. “However, I was wrong.”
9
Question 6

10. 10

11. cloud-based, collaborative
writing activities
-being peer reviewed
-doing peer review 11

12. Sadler and Good, 2006
(p≤0.05)
12

13. 13

14. students’ concerns about
plagiarism
14
2

15. 15

16. 16

17. Survey Questions
1. Get ethics approval from BCIT.
2. Do a “before” then “after” survey.
3. Conduct Study.
17

18. 1 The Assignment Rubric
18

19. 19

20. 2 Past Sample Analysis
20

21. 3 BCIT User Agreement
21

22. 4
into Google Docs
22
LTC EduEXPO

23. 5
http://www.slideshare.net/gandrich
23
LTC EduEXPO

24. 6 The Peer Review Steps
LTC EduEXPO
24Sandwich_2 by Alvimann under the Morguefile free photo license
Tickets by Dodgerman
Skillhause under the
Morguefile free photo license

25. 25
Suggestive or
Epistemic
Guash, 2013
HOC (DukeU)
Reinforcing, community
building (Tseng & Tsai, 2007)

26. 26

27. 5a Significant Results
27
“seeing cloud-based
samples is better than
paper.”
40% to 85%
(p = 0.01)

28. “It’s much easier to share
and be anonymous
digitally.
”
28
http://applenapps.com/app-updates/despicable-me-minion-
rush-keeps-running-with-el-machos-lair.html#.VyJNAvkrKM8
Question 5a

29. 6 Significant Results
29
“My writing improves
by reviewing peer
samples.”
100% to 80%
(p = 0.03)

30. “Speaking of peer
editing, [sic] I think
providing comments and
suggestions on peers’
writing, editing also
improved my writing by
association…
”30
http://applenapps.com/app-updates/despicable-me-minion-
rush-keeps-running-with-el-machos-lair.html#.VyJNAvkrKM8
Question 6

31. “…I made sure to
double-check my writing
by following the checklist
”
31
Question 6

32. 7 Results
32
“I am concerned about
others copying my
work when I share my
writing with peers.”
28% to 40%
(p = 0.60)

33. “Depending on who is
reviewing and whether or
not I think I have a unique
perspective
”
33
Question 7

34. Challenges
34
Demographic
Busy lives

35. “Falling short in the last
week when the amount of
due dates piled up” and …
”
35
Constraints

36. “…“having problems in
the past with
procrastinating large
assignments
”
36
Constraints

37. Challenges
37
Demographic
Busy lives
Survey questions
Math matters
Google docs

38. “For most of [sic] peer
review sessions I worked
with a partner...
”
39
Teamwork

39. “…Thus, I’ve learned
that when working with
someone else, one has to
be mindful of another’s
perspective, or …
”
40
Teamwork

40. “…another opinion
which is imperative for
improving teamwork skills.
”
41
Teamwork

41. keep innovating and finding
ways to increase the use of
cloud-based pedagogies
LTC EduEXPO
42

42. Gjoa_
Andrichuk@b
cit.ca
@gandrich
43
Paper:http://tiny
url.com/peer-
cloud-gandrich

43. References
Duke University. (n.d.). Providing Feedback HOCs and LOCs. Retrieved from Writing
Studio: http://twp.duke.edu/uploads/media_items/providing-feedback-
1.original.pdf
Government of British Columbia . (2012). British Columbia's International Education
Strategy. Victoria, BC: The BC Jobs Plan.
Premier’s Technology Council, P. T. (2010). A vision for 21st Century Education.
Vancouver, BC: The Premier’s Technology Council (PTC). Retrieved February 1,
2016 from
http://www.gov.bc.ca/premier/attachments/PTC_vision%20for_education.pdf
Sadler and Good. (2006). The impact of Self- and Peer-Grading on Student Learning. Educational
gjoaAssessment, 11(1), 1-31.
Warschauer, M. (2011). Learning in the Cloud. How (and Why) to Transform Schools with
Digital Media. New York, NY 10027: Teachers College Press.
Yim, S., Warschauer, M., Zheng, B., & Lawrence, J. F. (2014). Cloud-Based Collaborative
Writing and the Common Core Standards. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy
58(3), 243-253.
44