The document is a briefing from AMD on their upcoming launch of new EPYC 7Fx2 processors. It provides details on the processors' expected performance leadership in various workloads compared to Intel Xeon alternatives, including highest performance on SPECrate benchmarks. It highlights new features like higher frequencies and support from partners like Nutanix. It concludes by detailing the new top-of-stack 7002 series processors with up to 24 cores and competitive performance and pricing compared to Intel.
GPU compute has leveraged discrete GPUs for a fairly limited set of academic and supercomputing system workloads until recently. With the increase in performance of integrated GPU inside an Accelerated Processing Unit (APU), introduction of Heterogeneous System Architecture (HSA) devices, and proliferation of programming tools, we are seeing GPU compute make its way into mainstream applications. In this presentation we cover GPU compute and HSA, focusing on the application of GPU compute in the Medical and Print Imaging segments. Examples of performance data are reviewed and the case is made for how GPU compute can deliver tangible benefits.
GPU compute has leveraged discrete GPUs for a fairly limited set of academic and supercomputing system workloads until recently. With the increase in performance of integrated GPU inside an Accelerated Processing Unit (APU), introduction of Heterogeneous System Architecture (HSA) devices, and proliferation of programming tools, we are seeing GPU compute make its way into mainstream applications. In this presentation we cover GPU compute and HSA, focusing on the application of GPU compute in the Medical and Print Imaging segments. Examples of performance data are reviewed and the case is made for how GPU compute can deliver tangible benefits.
In this deck from the Rice Oil & Gas Conference, Bradley McCredie from AMD presents: Scaling TCO in a Post Moore's Law Era.
"While foundries bravely drive forward to overcome the technical and economic challenges posed by scaling to 5nm and beyond, Moore’s law alone can provide only a fraction of the performance / watt and performance / dollar gains needed to satisfy the demands of today’s high performance computing and artificial intelligence applications. To close the gap, multiple strategies are required. First, new levels of innovation and design efficiency will supplement technology gains to continue to deliver meaningful improvements in SoC performance. Second, heterogenous compute architectures will create x-factor increases of performance efficiency for the most critical applications. Finally, open software frameworks, APIs, and toolsets will enable broad ecosystems of application level innovation."
Watch the video:
Learn more: http://amd.com
and
https://rice2020oghpc.rice.edu/program-2/
Sign up for our insideHPC Newsletter: http://insidehpc.com/newsletter
Horizon 2013 AMD's Tryst with Technology - A Path to Procurement Excellence Zycus
The world of procurement has evolved over the years into a respected profession within every successful company. Technology has been, and continues to be, a key enabler on this journey. This presentation will speak to the application of eProcurement within the Strategic Sourcing Process at AMD.
Panel Internet & infraestructura - Dia Mundial de InternetMarcos Pueyrredon
Panel Internet & infraestructura;
Aspectos regulatorios e infraestructura necesaria para el funcionamiento de Internet: conectividad; banda ancha; hardware; regulaciones; Internet Governance, presentacion realizada por Silvia Caruso (AMD)
Mod Podge Manufacturing Process, Machinery Requirements and Project ReportIMARC Group
The report provides a complete roadmap for setting up an mod podge manufacturing plant. It covers a comprehensive market overview to micro-level information such as unit operations involved, raw material requirements, utility requirements, infrastructure requirements, machinery and technology requirements, manpower requirements, packaging requirements, transportation requirements, etc.
More Info:- https://www.imarcgroup.com/mod-podge-manufacturing-plant-project-report
Project Report on MDF Board Manufacturing PlantIMARC Group
The report provides a complete roadmap for setting up an mdf board manufacturing plant. It covers a comprehensive market overview to micro-level information such as unit operations involved, raw material requirements, utility requirements, infrastructure requirements, machinery and technology requirements, manpower requirements, packaging requirements, transportation requirements, etc.
More Info:- https://www.imarcgroup.com/mdf-board-manufacturing-plant-project-report
State of ICS and IoT Cyber Threat Landscape Report 2024 previewPrayukth K V
The IoT and OT threat landscape report has been prepared by the Threat Research Team at Sectrio using data from Sectrio, cyber threat intelligence farming facilities spread across over 85 cities around the world. In addition, Sectrio also runs AI-based advanced threat and payload engagement facilities that serve as sinks to attract and engage sophisticated threat actors, and newer malware including new variants and latent threats that are at an earlier stage of development.
The latest edition of the OT/ICS and IoT security Threat Landscape Report 2024 also covers:
State of global ICS asset and network exposure
Sectoral targets and attacks as well as the cost of ransom
Global APT activity, AI usage, actor and tactic profiles, and implications
Rise in volumes of AI-powered cyberattacks
Major cyber events in 2024
Malware and malicious payload trends
Cyberattack types and targets
Vulnerability exploit attempts on CVEs
Attacks on counties – USA
Expansion of bot farms – how, where, and why
In-depth analysis of the cyber threat landscape across North America, South America, Europe, APAC, and the Middle East
Why are attacks on smart factories rising?
Cyber risk predictions
Axis of attacks – Europe
Systemic attacks in the Middle East
Download the full report from here:
https://sectrio.com/resources/ot-threat-landscape-reports/sectrio-releases-ot-ics-and-iot-security-threat-landscape-report-2024/
Accelerate your Kubernetes clusters with Varnish CachingThijs Feryn
A presentation about the usage and availability of Varnish on Kubernetes. This talk explores the capabilities of Varnish caching and shows how to use the Varnish Helm chart to deploy it to Kubernetes.
This presentation was delivered at K8SUG Singapore. See https://feryn.eu/presentations/accelerate-your-kubernetes-clusters-with-varnish-caching-k8sug-singapore-28-2024 for more details.
UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series, part 4DianaGray10
Welcome to UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series part 4. In this session, we will cover Test Manager overview along with SAP heatmap.
The UiPath Test Manager overview with SAP heatmap webinar offers a concise yet comprehensive exploration of the role of a Test Manager within SAP environments, coupled with the utilization of heatmaps for effective testing strategies.
Participants will gain insights into the responsibilities, challenges, and best practices associated with test management in SAP projects. Additionally, the webinar delves into the significance of heatmaps as a visual aid for identifying testing priorities, areas of risk, and resource allocation within SAP landscapes. Through this session, attendees can expect to enhance their understanding of test management principles while learning practical approaches to optimize testing processes in SAP environments using heatmap visualization techniques
What will you get from this session?
1. Insights into SAP testing best practices
2. Heatmap utilization for testing
3. Optimization of testing processes
4. Demo
Topics covered:
Execution from the test manager
Orchestrator execution result
Defect reporting
SAP heatmap example with demo
Speaker:
Deepak Rai, Automation Practice Lead, Boundaryless Group and UiPath MVP
DevOps and Testing slides at DASA ConnectKari Kakkonen
My and Rik Marselis slides at 30.5.2024 DASA Connect conference. We discuss about what is testing, then what is agile testing and finally what is Testing in DevOps. Finally we had lovely workshop with the participants trying to find out different ways to think about quality and testing in different parts of the DevOps infinity loop.
Dev Dives: Train smarter, not harder – active learning and UiPath LLMs for do...UiPathCommunity
💥 Speed, accuracy, and scaling – discover the superpowers of GenAI in action with UiPath Document Understanding and Communications Mining™:
See how to accelerate model training and optimize model performance with active learning
Learn about the latest enhancements to out-of-the-box document processing – with little to no training required
Get an exclusive demo of the new family of UiPath LLMs – GenAI models specialized for processing different types of documents and messages
This is a hands-on session specifically designed for automation developers and AI enthusiasts seeking to enhance their knowledge in leveraging the latest intelligent document processing capabilities offered by UiPath.
Speakers:
👨🏫 Andras Palfi, Senior Product Manager, UiPath
👩🏫 Lenka Dulovicova, Product Program Manager, UiPath
LF Energy Webinar: Electrical Grid Modelling and Simulation Through PowSyBl -...DanBrown980551
Do you want to learn how to model and simulate an electrical network from scratch in under an hour?
Then welcome to this PowSyBl workshop, hosted by Rte, the French Transmission System Operator (TSO)!
During the webinar, you will discover the PowSyBl ecosystem as well as handle and study an electrical network through an interactive Python notebook.
PowSyBl is an open source project hosted by LF Energy, which offers a comprehensive set of features for electrical grid modelling and simulation. Among other advanced features, PowSyBl provides:
- A fully editable and extendable library for grid component modelling;
- Visualization tools to display your network;
- Grid simulation tools, such as power flows, security analyses (with or without remedial actions) and sensitivity analyses;
The framework is mostly written in Java, with a Python binding so that Python developers can access PowSyBl functionalities as well.
What you will learn during the webinar:
- For beginners: discover PowSyBl's functionalities through a quick general presentation and the notebook, without needing any expert coding skills;
- For advanced developers: master the skills to efficiently apply PowSyBl functionalities to your real-world scenarios.
JMeter webinar - integration with InfluxDB and GrafanaRTTS
Watch this recorded webinar about real-time monitoring of application performance. See how to integrate Apache JMeter, the open-source leader in performance testing, with InfluxDB, the open-source time-series database, and Grafana, the open-source analytics and visualization application.
In this webinar, we will review the benefits of leveraging InfluxDB and Grafana when executing load tests and demonstrate how these tools are used to visualize performance metrics.
Length: 30 minutes
Session Overview
-------------------------------------------
During this webinar, we will cover the following topics while demonstrating the integrations of JMeter, InfluxDB and Grafana:
- What out-of-the-box solutions are available for real-time monitoring JMeter tests?
- What are the benefits of integrating InfluxDB and Grafana into the load testing stack?
- Which features are provided by Grafana?
- Demonstration of InfluxDB and Grafana using a practice web application
To view the webinar recording, go to:
https://www.rttsweb.com/jmeter-integration-webinar
Generating a custom Ruby SDK for your web service or Rails API using Smithyg2nightmarescribd
Have you ever wanted a Ruby client API to communicate with your web service? Smithy is a protocol-agnostic language for defining services and SDKs. Smithy Ruby is an implementation of Smithy that generates a Ruby SDK using a Smithy model. In this talk, we will explore Smithy and Smithy Ruby to learn how to generate custom feature-rich SDKs that can communicate with any web service, such as a Rails JSON API.
Slack (or Teams) Automation for Bonterra Impact Management (fka Social Soluti...Jeffrey Haguewood
Sidekick Solutions uses Bonterra Impact Management (fka Social Solutions Apricot) and automation solutions to integrate data for business workflows.
We believe integration and automation are essential to user experience and the promise of efficient work through technology. Automation is the critical ingredient to realizing that full vision. We develop integration products and services for Bonterra Case Management software to support the deployment of automations for a variety of use cases.
This video focuses on the notifications, alerts, and approval requests using Slack for Bonterra Impact Management. The solutions covered in this webinar can also be deployed for Microsoft Teams.
Interested in deploying notification automations for Bonterra Impact Management? Contact us at sales@sidekicksolutionsllc.com to discuss next steps.
Monitoring Java Application Security with JDK Tools and JFR Events
AMD Epyc 7Fx2 Press Deck
1. DAVIDCHANG
Senior Manager, Server BU, AMD
AMD EPYC™ 7Fx2 PROCESSORS
LAUNCH PRE-BRIEFING
Contents Under Embargo Until April 14 @ 8 AM Central U.S. Time
2. [AMD Official Use Only - Internal Distribution Only]
2
EPYC™ HIGH FREQUENCY ANNOUNCEMENT REVIEWERS BRIEFING |
MARCH, 2020 – AMD CONFIDENTIAL – NDA REQUIRED
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT
This presentation contains forward-looking statements concerning Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (AMD) such as the timing, features, functionality, availability, performance, expectations and expected
benefits related to AMD products and future products, including EPYC™ 7Fx2 Processors; AMD’s ability to achieve double digit market share in the second quarter of 2020; and AMD’s CPU roadmap,
which are made pursuant to the Safe Harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements are commonly identified by words such as "would," "may,"
"expects," "believes," "plans," "intends," "projects" and other terms with similar meaning. Investors are cautioned that the forward-looking statements in this presentation are based on current
beliefs, assumptions and expectations, speak only as of the date of this presentation and involve risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from current expectations.
Such statements are subject to certain known and unknown risks and uncertainties, many of which are difficult to predict and generally beyond AMD's control, that could cause actual results and
other future events to differ materially from those expressed in, or implied or projected by, the forward-looking information and statements. Material factors that could cause actual results to differ
materially from current expectations include, without limitation, the following: Intel Corporation’s dominance of the microprocessor market and its aggressive business practices; the ability of third
party manufacturers to manufacture AMD's products on a timely basis in sufficient quantities and using competitive technologies; expected manufacturing yields for AMD’s products; AMD's ability to
introduce products on a timely basis with features and performance levels that provide value to its customers while supporting and coinciding with significant industry transitions; AMD's ability to
generate sufficient revenue and operating cash flow or obtain external financing for research and development or other strategic investments; the loss of a significant customer; AMD's ability to
generate revenue from its semi-custom SoC products; global economic uncertainty; political, legal and economic risks, natural disasters, and public health risks, including the impact of COVID-19;
government actions and regulations such as export administration regulations, tariffs and trade protection measures may limit our ability export our products to certain customers; potential security
vulnerabilities; potential IT outages, data loss, data breaches and cyber-attacks; the ability of GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. to satisfy AMD’s manufacturing requirements; uncertainties involving the
ordering and shipment of AMD’s products; quarterly and seasonal sales patterns; the restrictions imposed by agreements governing AMD’s notes and the secured credit facility; the competitive
markets in which AMD’s products are sold; the potential dilutive effect if the 2.125% Convertible Senior Notes due 2026 are converted; the market conditions of the industries in which AMD products
are sold; AMD’s reliance on third-party intellectual property to design and introduce new products in a timely manner; AMD's reliance on third-party companies for the design, manufacture and
supply of motherboards, software and other computer platform components; AMD's reliance on Microsoft Corporation and other software vendors' support to design and develop software to run on
AMD’s products; AMD’s reliance on third-party distributors and add-in-board partners; future impairments of goodwill and technology license purchases; AMD’s ability to attract and retain qualified
personnel; AMD's indebtedness; AMD's ability to generate sufficient cash to service its debt obligations or meet its working capital requirements; AMD's ability to repurchase its outstanding debt in
the event of a change of control; the cyclical nature of the semiconductor industry; the impact of acquisitions, joint ventures and/or investments on AMD's business; the impact of modification or
interruption of AMD’s internal business processes and information systems; the availability of essential equipment, materials or manufacturing processes; compatibility of AMD’s products with some
or all industry-standard software and hardware; costs related to defective products; the efficiency of AMD's supply chain; AMD's ability to rely on third party supply-chain logistics functions; AMD’s
stock price volatility; worldwide political conditions; unfavorable currency exchange rate fluctuations; AMD’s ability to effectively control the sales of its products on the gray market; AMD's ability to
adequately protect its technology or other intellectual property; current and future claims and litigation;potential tax liabilities; and environmental laws, conflict minerals-related provisions and other
laws or regulations. Investors are urged to review in detail the risks and uncertainties in AMD's Securities and Exchange Commissionfilings, including but not limited to AMD's Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 28, 2019.
3. [AMD Official Use Only - Internal Distribution Only]
3
EPYC™ HIGH FREQUENCY ANNOUNCEMENT REVIEWERS BRIEFING |
MARCH, 2020 – AMD CONFIDENTIAL – NDA REQUIRED
*EPYC™ 7702
**Based on Virtualization
See Endnotes ROM-517, 544, 557.
2NDGEN AMD EPYC™
HIGHEST PERFORMANCE x86 PROCESSOR*
Contents Under Embargo Until April 14 @ 8 AM Central U.S. Time
4. [AMD Official Use Only - Internal Distribution Only]
4
EPYC™ HIGH FREQUENCY ANNOUNCEMENT REVIEWERS BRIEFING |
MARCH, 2020 – AMD CONFIDENTIAL – NDA REQUIRED AMD Internal Estimates
Contents Under Embargo Until April 14 @ 8 AM Central U.S. Time
5. [AMD Official Use Only - Internal Distribution Only]
5
EPYC™ HIGH FREQUENCY ANNOUNCEMENT REVIEWERS BRIEFING |
MARCH, 2020 – AMD CONFIDENTIAL – NDA REQUIRED
ROM-169 world records as of March 27, 2020;
https://www.amd.com/en/processors/epyc-world-records
AMD Internal Data and Estimates
Contents Under Embargo Until April 14 @ 8 AM Central U.S. Time
6. [AMD Official Use Only - Internal Distribution Only]
6
EPYC™ HIGH FREQUENCY ANNOUNCEMENT REVIEWERS BRIEFING |
MARCH, 2020 – AMD CONFIDENTIAL – NDA REQUIRED
Accelerating Time to Insight
Requires World-Class Database
Performance, Faster Decisions
Ensuring Data Center ROI
Requires HCI For A
Significantly Lower TCO
Enabling Design Advantages
Requires Max Design Iterations
From Commercial HPC Apps
IT'S TIME TO CHANGE.
7. [AMD Official Use Only - Internal Distribution Only]
7
EPYC™ HIGH FREQUENCY ANNOUNCEMENT REVIEWERS BRIEFING |
MARCH, 2020 – AMD CONFIDENTIAL – NDA REQUIRED
New 48 Core Bare Metal
Instances
Nutanix HCI Certification
and Support of EPYC
SMC SuperBlade®
First AMD EPYC™ Powered Blade Server
7F32 8 core 7F52 16 core 7F72 24 core
Delivering per-core
performance(est) leadership
and value for enterprise
workloads
HyperConverged Infrastructure
Commercial HPC Applications
Relational Databases3.5/~3.9Ghz, 240W,
256MB L3 Cache
3.2/~3.7Ghz, 240W,
192MB L3 Cache
3.7/~3.9Ghz, 180W,
128MB L3 Cache
See endnote: EPYC-18, ROM-621
Contents Under Embargo Until April 14 @ 8 AM Central U.S. Time
8. [AMD Official Use Only - Internal Distribution Only]
8
EPYC™ HIGH FREQUENCY ANNOUNCEMENT REVIEWERS BRIEFING |
MARCH, 2020 – AMD CONFIDENTIAL – NDA REQUIRED
7F32 8 core
7F52 16 core
7F72 24 core
$2,450 1Ku
New EPYC™ 7002 Series Top
of Stack 24, 16 and 8-core
7352 24 2.3 GHz 155
7302 16 3.0 GHz 155
7282 16 2.8 GHz 120/135
7262 8 3.2 GHz 155
7252 8 3.1 GHz 120
7402 24 2.8 GHz 180
$3,100 1Ku
$2,100 1Ku
6.44 6.58
7.98
6.94 7.53
8.94
8.69 9.00
9.56
Xeon®
Gold 6248R
Xeon®
Platinum 8268
EPYC™
7F72
Xeon®
Gold 6242
Xeon®
Gold 6246R
EPYC™
7F52
Xeon®
Gold 6244
Xeon®
Gold 6250
EPYC™
7F32
Prices on 02/25/2020: Intel from ark.intel.com, AMD prices 1kU. SPEC®, SPECrate® scores on March 9, 2020. SPEC®, SPECrate® and SPEC CPU® are registered trademarks of the
Standard Performance Evaluation Corporation. See www.spec.org for more information. See endnotes: ROM-558, 562, 563, 566, 602, 603, 618, 619, 620.
2P SPECrate®2017_int_base score per core
0.73 0.32 1.00 Perf (est) /CPU$
0.96 0.80 1.00 Perf (est) /CPU$
0.56 0.69 1.00 Perf (est) /CPU$
Contents Under Embargo Until
April 14 @ 8 AM Central U.S. Time
(est)
(est)
(est)
9. [AMD Official Use Only - Internal Distribution Only]
9
EPYC™ HIGH FREQUENCY ANNOUNCEMENT REVIEWERS BRIEFING |
MARCH, 2020 – AMD CONFIDENTIAL – NDA REQUIRED
HIGH-PERFORMANCE
High Performance “Zen 2” core
Higher base and boost frequencies
7nm process delivers more performance for
less power
SYSTEM DESIGN
Eliminate bottlenecks with industry leading
8 channels of DDR4-3200 memory and up
to 128 lanes of PCIe® 4.0 connectivity
CPU ARCHITECTURE
Larger L3 cache located close to cores provides
low latency access to critical data.
Infinity Architecture enables linear scaling
Processor Base Freq.
(GHz)
Max. Freq
(GHz)
Max Mem
Speed (MHz)
Max Memory
Capacity
PCIe®
Cache/
Core (MB)
SPECrate®2017_int_base
2P
SPECrate®2017_fp_base
2P
List price
Intel® Xeon® Gold 6242 2.8 3.9 2933 1TB Gen3 1.4 222 210 $2,529
Intel® Xeon® Gold 6246R 3.4 4.1 2933 1TB Gen3 2.2 248 231 $3,286
AMD EPYC™ 7F52 3.5 3.9 3200 4TB Gen4 16.0 286 (est) 333 (est) $3,100
2S Intel Xeon Gold 6242 (16C) SPECrate®2017_fp_base score of 210 http://spec.org/cpu2017/results/res2019q2/cpu2017-20190430-13303.pdf
2S Intel Xeon Gold 6246R (16C) SPECrate®2017_fp_base score of 231 http://spec.org/cpu2017/results/res2020q1/cpu2017-20200303-21211.pdf
See endnote: EPYC-18, ROM-06, 562, 603. SPECrate® and SPEC CPU® are registered trademarks of the Standard Performance Evaluation Corporation. See www.spec.org for more information.
Contents Under Embargo Until April 14 @ 8 AM Central U.S. Time
10. [AMD Official Use Only - Internal Distribution Only]
10
EPYC™ HIGH FREQUENCY ANNOUNCEMENT PRESS BRIEFING |
MARCH, 2020 – AMD CONFIDENTIAL – NDA REQUIRED
47% higher
VMmark® 3.1 vSAN score for
4-node 2-socket systems*
7F72 24 core
7F72 24 core
*Based on Dell EMC analysis. Results achieved comparing Dell EMC PowerEdge R6525 published
VMmark 3.1 benchmark performance score against the second highest available score for 4-node 2-
socket systems with VMware vSAN storage on April 14, 2020.For benchmark results click here.
previous #1 score
11. [AMD Official Use Only - Internal Distribution Only]
11
EPYC™ HIGH FREQUENCY ANNOUNCEMENT REVIEWERS BRIEFING |
MARCH, 2020 – AMD CONFIDENTIAL – NDA REQUIRED
HPE ProLiant DX Servers
integrated with top
rated HCI software from
Nutanix
HPE ProLiant DX Servers featuring
AMD EPYC 7Fx2 processors with
Nutanix HCI software
Available in Q3
Contents Under Embargo Until April 14 @ 8 AM Central U.S. Time
12. EPYC™ HIGH FREQUENCY ANNOUNCEMENT REVIEWERS BRIEFING | MARCH, 2020 – AMD CONFIDENTIAL – NDA REQUIRED
[AMD Official Use Only - Internal Distribution Only]
12 EPYC™ 7FX2 PROCESSOR ANNOUNCEMENT REVIEWERS BRIEFING | MARCH, 2020 – AMD CONFIDENTIAL – NDA REQUIRED
31
7F52 16 core
7F72 24 core
See endnotes ROM-574, 587, 590, 594, 597.
Contents Under Embargo Until April 14 @ 8 AM Central U.S. Time
13. EPYC™ HIGH FREQUENCY ANNOUNCEMENT REVIEWERS BRIEFING | MARCH, 2020 – AMD CONFIDENTIAL – NDA REQUIRED
[AMD Official Use Only - Internal Distribution Only]
13 EPYC™ 7FX2 PROCESSOR ANNOUNCEMENT REVIEWERS BRIEFING | MARCH, 2020 – AMD CONFIDENTIAL – NDA REQUIRED
EXTENDINGEPYCINTHECLOUD
Contents Under Embargo Until April 14 @ 8 AM Central U.S. Time
FIRSTCLOUDPROVIDERWITH EPYC7F72CPUS
FASTESTHIGHCORE-COUNTDUALSOCKETBAREMETALPROCESSORATIBMCLOUD
IDEALFORHPC,DATABASEANDCOMPUTEINTENSEWORKLOADS
QUICKLYSOLVEDATAANALYTICS,EDA,ANDHPCCOMPUTATIONALTASKS
Source: IBM Cloud
14. EPYC™ HIGH FREQUENCY ANNOUNCEMENT REVIEWERS BRIEFING | MARCH, 2020 – AMD CONFIDENTIAL – NDA REQUIRED
[AMD Official Use Only - Internal Distribution Only]
14 EPYC™ 7FX2 PROCESSOR ANNOUNCEMENT REVIEWERS BRIEFING | MARCH, 2020 – AMD CONFIDENTIAL – NDA REQUIRED
7F52 16 core
7F32 8 core
Superior Choice for Core Based SW Licensing Situations
17% More
versus Intel® Xeon® Gold 6244 - see endnotes ROM-571, 572.
SQL Server® 2017
Transactions per
Minute (tpm)
Contents Under Embargo Until April 14 @ 8 AM Central U.S. Time
35% More
2 x AMD EPYC™ 7F32 Vs
2 x Intel Xeon® 6244
2 x AMD EPYC™ 7F52 Vs
2 x Intel Xeon® 6242
Transactions per
minute/CPU$
15. EPYC™ HIGH FREQUENCY ANNOUNCEMENT REVIEWERS BRIEFING | MARCH, 2020 – AMD CONFIDENTIAL – NDA REQUIRED
[AMD Official Use Only - Internal Distribution Only]
15 EPYC™ 7FX2 PROCESSOR ANNOUNCEMENT REVIEWERS BRIEFING | MARCH, 2020 – AMD CONFIDENTIAL – NDA REQUIRED
Supermicro SuperBlade®
Highest Performance with Advanced
Networking and NVMe*
Up to 200G HDR InfiniBand
Up to 280W CPU Support
PCIe Gen 4.0 support
Ideal for Volume Enterprise Data Center
https://www.supermicro.com/en/products/superblade
Contents Under Embargo Until April 14 @ 8 AM Central U.S. Time
Full range of Single AMD EPYC 7002 Series Processors (Socket SP3)
• Database
• Commercial HPC
• Virtualization
and VDI
16. EPYC™ HIGH FREQUENCY ANNOUNCEMENT REVIEWERS BRIEFING | MARCH, 2020 – AMD CONFIDENTIAL – NDA REQUIRED
[AMD Official Use Only - Internal Distribution Only]
16 EPYC™ 7FX2 PROCESSOR ANNOUNCEMENT REVIEWERS BRIEFING | MARCH, 2020 – AMD CONFIDENTIAL – NDA REQUIRED
Roadmap Subject to Change
17. EPYC™ HIGH FREQUENCY ANNOUNCEMENT REVIEWERS BRIEFING | MARCH, 2020 – AMD CONFIDENTIAL – NDA REQUIRED
[AMD Official Use Only - Internal Distribution Only]
17 EPYC™ 7FX2 PROCESSOR ANNOUNCEMENT REVIEWERS BRIEFING | MARCH, 2020 – AMD CONFIDENTIAL – NDA REQUIRED
7F32 8 core 7F52 16 core 7F72 24 core
Delivering the highest per-core
leadership performance(est)
and value for enterprise
workloads
HyperConverged Infrastructure
Commercial HPC Applications
Relational Databases
Available 4/14 – System Availability varies by OEM partner
DX Appliances Available in Q3 Available in Q2 Planned Availability Q2-2020
New 48 Core Bare Metal
Instances
Nutanix HCI Certification
and Support of EPYC
SMC SuperBlade®
First AMD EPYC™ Powered
Blade Server
See endnotes: ROM-621
Contents Under Embargo Until April 14 @ 8 AM Central U.S. Time
19. EPYC™ HIGH FREQUENCY ANNOUNCEMENT REVIEWERS BRIEFING | MARCH, 2020 – AMD CONFIDENTIAL – NDA REQUIRED
[AMD Official Use Only - Internal Distribution Only]
EPYC-07: Based on June 8, 2018 AMD internal testing of same-architectureproduct ported from 14 to 7 nm technology with similar implementationflow/methodology, using performance from SGEMM.
EPYC-18: Max boost for AMD EPYC processors is the maximum frequency achievable by any single core on the processor under normal operating conditions for server systems.
ROM-06: Some supported features and functionalityof 2nd Gen AMD EPYC™ processors require a BIOS update from your server manufacturer when used with a motherboard designed for the 1st Gen AMD EPYC series
processor. A motherboard designed for 2nd Gen EPYC processors is required to enable all available functionality.
ROM-169: For a complete list of world records see http://amd.com/worldrecords. ROM-517: 16-n, 2P 2nd Gen EPYC™ 7702 powered server scores a world record result of 7100 SPECrate®2017_int_base
http://spec.org/cpu2017/results/res2020q1/cpu2017-20191223-20452.pdf. The next highest published score is 3920 SPECrate®2017_int_base on a 16-n, 2-socket Xeon® 8180 powered server
http://spec.org/cpu2017/results/res2018q1/cpu2017-20171222-01950.pdf as of 02/12/20.
ROM-517: 16-n, 2P 2nd Gen EPYC™ 7702 powered server scores a world record result of 7100 SPECrate®2017_int_base http://spec.org/cpu2017/results/res2020q1/cpu2017-20191223-20452.pdf. The next highest
published score is 3920 SPECrate®2017_int_base on a 16-n, 2-socket Xeon® 8180 powered server http://spec.org/cpu2017/results/res2018q1/cpu2017-20171222-01950.pdf as of 02/12/20. ROM-517
ROM-544: 1P 2nd Gen EPYC™ 7742 powered server scores a 1-n, 1-socket world record result of 355 SPECrate®2017_int_base http://spec.org/cpu2017/results/res2020q1/cpu2017-20191223-20460.pdf. The next highest
published score is 181 SPECrate®2017_int_base on a 1-n, 1-socket Xeon® 8280 powered server https://www.spec.org/cpu2017/results/res2019q2/cpu2017-20190318-11230.html as of 02/12/20. ROM-544
ROM-557: Estimates based on AMD Server Virtualization TCO (total cost of ownership) Estimator tool v5.5, comparing the AMD EPYC™ and Intel® Xeon® server solutions required to deliver 320 total virtual machines (VM),
requiring 1 core and 8GB of memory per VM, with a minimum total solution memory requirement of 2.56 TB of memory. The analysis includes both hardware and virtualizationsoftware components. For 320 VMs and 1
core per VM, the Intel _Gold_6250 processor requires 20 - 2P servers. The AMD EPYC_7702P solution requires 5 - 1P servers. Virtualizationsoftware pricing as of October 2019. Third party names are for informational
purposes only and may be trademarks of their respective owners. This scenario contains many assumptions and estimates and, while based on AMD internal research and best approximations, should be considered an
example for informationpurposes only, and not used as a basis for decision making over actual testing. All pricing is in USD. ROM-557
ROM-558: SPECrate®2017_int_base results and pricing as of March 02, 2020. Core count is per processor: 2P Intel Xeon Platinum_8280L (28c), score of 364 and price of $13,012 for $/perf of $71.49 and perf/$ of 0.014;
6.50 perf/core; http://spec.org/cpu2017/results/res2019q2/cpu2017-20190429-12779.pdf. 2P Intel Xeon Platinum_8280 (28c), score of 359 and price of $10,009 for $/perf of $55.76 and perf/$ of 0.018; 6.41 perf/core;
http://spec.org/cpu2017/results/res2019q2/cpu2017-20190318-11210.pdf. 2P Intel Xeon Platinum_8276L (28c), score of 312 and price of $11,722 for a $/perf of $75.14 and perf/$ of 0.013; 5.57 perf/core;
http://spec.org/cpu2017/results/res2019q4/cpu2017-20190913-17834.pdf. 2P Intel Xeon Platinum_8276 (28c), score of 318 and price of $8,719 for a $/perf of $54.84 and perf/$ of 0.018; 5.68 perf/core;
http://spec.org/cpu2017/results/res2019q4/cpu2017-20190912-17820.pdf. 2P Intel Xeon Platinum_8270 (26c), score of 331 and price of $7,405 for a $/perf of $44.74 and perf/$ of 0.022; 6.37 perf/core;
http://spec.org/cpu2017/results/res2019q4/cpu2017-20191125-20143.pdf. 2P Intel Xeon Platinum_8268 (24c), score of 316 and price of $6,302 for a $/perf of $39.89 and perf/$ of 0.025; 6.58 perf/core;
http://spec.org/cpu2017/results/res2019q2/cpu2017-20190524-14465.pdf. 2P Intel Xeon Platinum_8260L (24c), score of 287 and price of $7,705 for a $/perf of $53.69 and perf/$ of 0.019; 5.98 perf/core;
http://spec.org/cpu2017/results/res2019q3/cpu2017-20190624-15572.pdf. 2P Intel Xeon Platinum_8260 (24c), score of 291 and price of $4,702 for a $/perf of $32.32 and perf/$ of 0.031; 6.06 perf/core;
http://spec.org/cpu2017/results/res2019q4/cpu2017-20191122-19972.pdf. 2P Intel Xeon Platinum_8253 (16c), score of 177 and price of $3,115 for a $/perf of $35.20 and perf/$ of 0.028; 5.53 perf/core;
http://spec.org/cpu2017/results/res2019q3/cpu2017-20190625-15872.pdf.Pricing in USD. AMD pricing 1kU, Intel pricing from ark.intel.com. SPEC® and SPECrate® are registered trademarks of Standard Performance
EvaluationCorporation. Learn more at spec.org. ROM-558
20. EPYC™ HIGH FREQUENCY ANNOUNCEMENT REVIEWERS BRIEFING | MARCH, 2020 – AMD CONFIDENTIAL – NDA REQUIRED
[AMD Official Use Only - Internal Distribution Only]
ROM-562: SPECrate®2017_int_base results and pricing as of March 02, 2020. Core count is per processor: 2P Intel Xeon Gold_6248R (24c), score of 309 and price of $2,700 for a $/perf of $17.48 and perf/$ of 0.057; 6.44
perf/core; http://spec.org/cpu2017/results/res2020q1/cpu2017-20200203-20817.pdf. 2P Intel Xeon Gold_6248 (20c), score of 266 and price of $3,072 for a $/perf of $23.0 and perf/$ of 0.043; 6.65 perf/core;
http://spec.org/cpu2017/results/res2019q3/cpu2017-20190625-15884.pdf. 2P Intel Xeon Gold_6246R (16c), score of 241 and price of $3,286 for a $/perf of $27.27 and perf/$ of 0.037; 7.53 perf/core;
http://spec.org/cpu2017/results/res2020q1/cpu2017-20200203-20785.pdf. 2P Intel Xeon Gold_6246 (12c), score of 204 and price of $3,286 for a $/perf of $32.22 and perf/$ of 0.031; 8.50 perf/core;
http://spec.org/cpu2017/results/res2019q2/cpu2017-20190610-14891.pdf. 2P Intel Xeon Gold_6244 (8c), score of 144 and price of $2,925 for a $/perf of $40.63 and perf/$ of 0.025; 9.00 perf/core;
http://spec.org/cpu2017/results/res2019q2/cpu2017-20190528-14871.pdf. 2P Intel Xeon Gold_6242R (20c), score of 271 and price of $2,529 for a $/perf of $8.66 and perf/$ of 0.054; 6.78 perf/core;
http://spec.org/cpu2017/results/res2020q1/cpu2017-20200203-20771.pdf. 2P Intel Xeon Gold_6242 (16c), score of 222 and price of $2,529 for a $/perf of $22.78 and perf/$ of 0.044; 6.94 perf/core;
http://spec.org/cpu2017/results/res2019q3/cpu2017-20190819-17115.pdf. 2P Intel Xeon Gold_6240R (24c), score of 259 and price of $2,200 for a $/perf of $16.99 and perf/$ of 0.059; 5.40 perf/core;
http://spec.org/cpu2017/results/res2020q1/cpu2017-20200203-20775.pdf. 2P Intel Xeon Gold_6240L (18c), score of 229 and price of $5,448 for a $/perf of $47.58 and perf/$ of 0.021; 6.36 perf/core;
http://spec.org/cpu2017/results/res2019q4/cpu2017-20191011-18962.pdf. 2P Intel Xeon Gold_6240 (18c), score of 234 and price of $2,445 for a $/perf of $20.90 and perf/$ of 0.048; 6.50 perf/core;
http://spec.org/cpu2017/results/res2019q4/cpu2017-20191119-19906.pdf. Pricing in USD. AMD pricing 1kU, Intel pricing from ark.intel.com. SPEC® and SPECrate® are registered trademarks of Standard Performance
EvaluationCorporation. Learn more at spec.org. ROM-562
ROM-563: SPECrate®2017_int_base results and pricing as of March 02, 2020. Core count is per processor: 2P Intel® Xeon® Gold_6238R (28c); score of 289 and price of $2,612 for a $/perf of $18.08 and perf/$ of 0.055;
http://spec.org/cpu2017/results/res2020q1/cpu2017-20200203-20847.pdf. 2P Intel® Xeon® Gold_6238L (22c); score of 252 and price of $5,615 for a $/perf of $44.56 and perf/$ of 0.022;
http://spec.org/cpu2017/results/res2019q3/cpu2017-20190819-17063.pdf. 2P Intel® Xeon® Gold_6238 (22c); score of 251 and price of $2,612 for a $/perf of $20.81 and perf/$ of 0.048;
http://spec.org/cpu2017/results/res2019q4/cpu2017-20191014-19101.pdf. 2P Intel® Xeon® Gold_6234 (8c); score of 128 and price of $2,214 for a $/perf of $34.59 and perf/$ of 0.029;
http://spec.org/cpu2017/results/res2019q2/cpu2017-20190611-15291.pdf. 2P Intel® Xeon® Gold_6230R (26c); score of 271 and price of $1,894 for a $/perf of $13.98 and a perf/$ of 0.072;
http://spec.org/cpu2017/results/res2020q1/cpu2017-20200203-20767.pdf. 2P Intel® Xeon® Gold_6230 (20c); score of 238 and price of $1,894 for a $/perf of $15.92 and perf/$ of 0.063;
http://spec.org/cpu2017/results/res2019q3/cpu2017-20190625-15880.pdf. 2P Intel® Xeon® Gold_6226R (16c); score of 209 and price of $1,300 for a $/perf of $12.44 and perf/$ of 0.080;
http://spec.org/cpu2017/results/res2020q1/cpu2017-20200203-20807.pdf. 2P Intel® Xeon® Gold_6226 (12c); score of 175 and price of $1,776 for a $/perf of $20.30 and perf/$ of 0.049;
http://spec.org/cpu2017/results/res2019q3/cpu2017-20190709-16044.pdf. 2P Intel® Xeon® Gold_6222V (20c); score of 203 and price of $1,600 for a $/perf of $15.76 and perf/$ of 0.063;
http://spec.org/cpu2017/results/res2019q4/cpu2017-20190913-17833.pdf. Pricing in USD. AMD pricing 1kU, Intel pricing from ark.intel.com. SPEC® and SPECrate® are registered trademarks of Standard Performance
EvaluationCorporation. Learn more at spec.org. ROM-563
ROM-565: SPECrate®2017_int_base results and pricing as of March 02, 2020. Core count is per processor: 2P Intel® Xeon® Gold_6152 (22c); score of 226 and price of $3,655 for a $/perf of $32.35 and perf/$ of 0.031; 5.14
perf/core; http://spec.org/cpu2017/results/res2019q2/cpu2017-20190424-12211.pdf. 2P Intel® Xeon® Gold_6148 (20c); score of 227 and price of $3,072 for a $/perf of $27.07 and perf/$ of 0.037; 5.68 perf/core;
http://spec.org/cpu2017/results/res2019q4/cpu2017-20190905-17805.pdf. 2P Intel® Xeon® Gold_6138 (20c); score of 200 and price of $2,612 for a $/perf of $26.12 and perf/$ of 0.038; 5.00 perf/core;
http://spec.org/cpu2017/results/res2018q3/cpu2017-20180622-07217.pdf. 2P Intel® Xeon® Gold_6130 (16c); score of 191 and price of $1,894 for a $/perf of $19.83 and perf/$ of 0.050; 5.97 perf/core;
http://spec.org/cpu2017/results/res2019q2/cpu2017-20190506-13570.pdf. 2P Intel® Xeon® Gold_5118 (12c); score of 133 and price of $1,273 for a $/perf of $19.14 and perf/$ of 0.052; 5.54 perf/core;
http://spec.org/cpu2017/results/res2019q3/cpu2017-20190805-16469.pdf. 2P Intel® Xeon® Silver_4114 (10c); score of 104 and a price of $694 for a $/perf of $13.35 and perf/$ of 0.075; 5.20 perf/core;
http://spec.org/cpu2017/results/res2019q3/cpu2017-20190805-16470.pdf. 2P Intel® Xeon® Silver_4110 (8c); score of 81.2 and price of $501 for a $/perf of $12.34 and a perf/$ of 0.081; 5.08 perf/core;
http://spec.org/cpu2017/results/res2019q4/cpu2017-20191108-19541.pdf. Pricing in USD. AMD pricing 1kU, Intel pricing from ark.intel.com. SPEC® and SPECrate® are registered trademarks of Standard Performance
EvaluationCorporation. Learn more at spec.org. ROM-565
ROM-566: SPECrate®2017_int_base results and pricing as of March 02, 2020. Core count is per processor: 2P AMD EPYC™ 7642 (48c); score of 572 and price of $4,475 for a $/perf of $15.65 and perf/$ of 0.064; 5.96
perf/core; http://spec.org/cpu2017/results/res2019q4/cpu2017-20191208-20250.pdf. 2P AMD EPYC™ 7552 (48c); score of 512 and price of $4,075 for a $/perf of $15.72 and perf/$ of 0.064; 5.33 perf/core;
http://spec.org/cpu2017/results/res2020q1/cpu2017-20191218-20417.pdf. 2P AMD EPYC™ 7532 (32c); score of 437 and price of $3,350 for a $/perf of $15.33 and perf/$ of 0.065; 6.83 perf/core;
http://spec.org/cpu2017/results/res2019q4/cpu2017-20191208-20243.pdf. 2P AMD EPYC™ 7502 (32c); score of 437 and price of $2,600 for a $/perf of $11.90 and perf/$ of 0.084; 6.83 perf/core;
http://spec.org/cpu2017/results/res2020q1/cpu2017-20191220-20433.pdf. 2P AMD EPYC™ 7452 (32c); score of 419 and price of $2,025 for a $/perf of $9.67 and perf/$ of 0.103; 6.55 perf/core;
http://spec.org/cpu2017/results/res2020q1/cpu2017-20200204-20863.pdf. 2P AMD EPYC™ 7402 (24c); score of 353 and a price of $1,783 for a $/perf of $10.10 and perf/$ of 0.099; 7.35 perf/core;
http://spec.org/cpu2017/results/res2020q1/cpu2017-20191220-20429.pdf. 2P AMD EPYC™ 7352 (24c); score of 325 and price of $1,350 for a $/perf of $8.31 and a perf/$ of 0.120; 6.77 perf/core;
http://spec.org/cpu2017/results/res2020q1/cpu2017-20191218-20397.pdf. 2P AMD EPYC™ 7302 (16c); score of 246 and price of $978 for a $/perf of $7.95 and a perf/$ of 0.126; 7.69 perf/core/
http://spec.org/cpu2017/results/res2020q1/cpu2017-20191220-20441.pdf. 2P AMD EPYC™ 7262 (8c); score of 134 and price of $575 for a $/perf of $8.58 and a perf/$ of 0.117; 8.38 perf/core;
http://spec.org/cpu2017/results/res2019q3/cpu2017-20190902-17341.pdf. Pricing in USD. AMD pricing 1kU. SPEC® and SPECrate® are registered trademarks of Standard PerformanceEvaluation Corporation. Learn more
at spec.org. ROM-566
21. EPYC™ HIGH FREQUENCY ANNOUNCEMENT REVIEWERS BRIEFING | MARCH, 2020 – AMD CONFIDENTIAL – NDA REQUIRED
[AMD Official Use Only - Internal Distribution Only]
ROM-569: 56% more 4-node, 2x VMmark® 3.1 vSAN™ tiles (VMs) per core as of 3/20/2020. Configurations: 2x EPYC 7F72 scoring 13.27 @ 14 tiles/266 VMs, 192 total cores, www.vmware.com/####)compared to the next
highest 192 total cores result 2x Intel® Xeon® Gold 6252 scoring 0.047 tiles per core (8.24 @ 9 tiles/171 VMs, https://www.vmware.com/content/dam/digitalmarketing/vmware/en/pdf/vmmark/2019-11-04-
QuantaCloudTechnology-QuantaGrid-D52B-1U.pdf). 56% higher VM/core is based on EPYC 7F72 266 VMs vs Xeon Gold 6252 171 VMs ((266/192)/(171/192))=1.56x the or 56% higher VMs/core. ROM-569
ROM-570: Highest per-core performancein the world based on SPECrate®2017_fp_base score rankings of result divided by total cores as of 3/20/2020. 2P EPYC 7F32 scoring 13.1 base result per-core (197
SPECrate®2017_fp_base/16 total cores, www.spec.org)compared to the next highest result 1P AMD EPYC 7262 scoring 11.54 base result per-core (92.3 SPECrate®2017_fp_base/8 total cores,
http://spec.org/cpu2017/results/res2020q1/cpu2017-20191220-20435.pdf) See www.spec.org/cpu2017/results for full ranking. ROM_570
ROM-571: Testing as of 3.20.2020 by AMD PerformanceLabs. Up to 17% higher SQL Server® tpm per core. Configurations: HammerDB3.3 (TPC-C® profile - The workload is derived from the TPC-C Benchmark, and as such is
not comparable to published TPC-C Benchmark results, as the OLTP workload results do not comply with the TPC-C benchmark). 2x EPYC 7F52 (32C total) scoring 4,872,975 tpm (152,280 tpm per core). 2x Xeon Gold 6244
(32C total) scoring 4,178,963 tpm (130,584 tpm per core). Results may vary.
ROM-572: Testing as of 3.20.2020 by AMD PerformanceLabs. Up to 10% higher SQL Server® tpm-per-core/lower cost-per-tpm. Configurations: HammerDB 3.3 (TPC-C® profile - The workload is derived from the TPC-C
Benchmark, and as such is not comparableto published TPC-C Benchmark results, as the OLTP workload results do not comply with the TPC-C benchmark). 2x EPYC 7F32 (16C total, $4200) scoring 2,692,958 tpm (168,310
tpm per core at $0.00156 per tpm). 2x Xeon Gold 6244 (16C total, $5850) scoring 2,446,340 tpm (152,896 tpm per core at $0.00239 per tpm). Results may vary.
ROM-574: Testing as of 3.20.2020 by AMD PerformanceLabs. Up to 30.9% higher EDA applicationperformanceon Synopsys® FineSim® workload at ~60% lower CPU acquisition cost. Configuration: 1x EPYC™ 7F72 (24C total,
$2450) relative runtime improvementof 26.5% compared to 2x Intel® Xeon® Gold 6246 (24C total, $6572). (6572-2450)/6572=0.627x or 62.7% or ~60% lower CPU cost. Results may vary.
ROM-577: Estimates based on AMD Server Virtualization TCO (total cost of ownership) Estimator tool v5.5, comparing the AMD EPYC™ and Intel® Xeon® server solutions required to deliver 320 total virtual machines (VM),
requiring 1 core and 8GB of memory per VM, with a minimum total solution memory requirement of 2.56 TB of memory. The analysis includes both hardware and virtualizationsoftware components. For 320 VMs and 1
core per VM, the Intel _Gold_6250 processor requires 20 - 2P servers. The AMD EPYC_7702P solution requires 5 - 1P servers. Virtualizationsoftware pricing as of October 2019. Third party names are for informational
purposes only and may be trademarks of their respective owners. This scenario contains many assumptions and estimates and, while based on AMD internal research and best approximations, should be considered an
example for informationpurposes only, and not used as a basis for decision making over actual testing. All pricing is in USD. ROM-557
ROM-587: Based on AMD internal testing of Altair RADIOSS™ 2018 running neon & t10m test cases as of 3/24/2020 on a 2x EPYC 7F52 (16C) powered reference server versus a 2x Intel Xeon Gold 6242 (16C) powered server.
Results may vary.
ROM-590: Based on AMD internal testing of ANSYS® CFX® 2019 R1 running Release 14.0 test cases as of 3/24/2020 on a 2x EPYC 7F52 (16C) powered reference server versus a 2x Intel Xeon Gold 6242 (16C) powered server.
Results may vary.
ROM-593: Based on AMD internal testing of ANSYS® LS-DYNA® R9.3.0 running neon, 3cars, & car2car test cases as of 3/24/2020 on a 2x EPYC 7F72 (24C) powered reference server versus a 2x Intel Xeon Platinum 8268 (24C)
powered server. Results may vary.
ROM-594: Based on AMD internal testing of Altair RADIOSS® 2018 running neon & t10m test cases as of 3/24/2020 on a 2x EPYC 7F72 (24C) powered reference server versus a 2x Intel Xeon Platinum 8268 (24C) powered
server. Results may vary. ROM-597: Based on AMD internal testing of ANSYS® CFX® 2019 R1 running Release 14.0 test cases as of 3/24/2020 on a 2x EPYC 7F72 (24C) powered reference server versus a 2x Intel Xeon Platinum
8268 (24C) powered server. Results may vary.
ROM-597: Based on AMD internal testing of ANSYS® CFX® 2019 R1 running Release 14.0 test cases as of 3/24/2020 on a 2x EPYC 7F72 (24C) powered reference server versus a 2x Intel Xeon Platinum 8268 (24C) powered
server. Results may vary.
ROM-602: SPECrate®2017_int_base results and pricing as of March 09, 2020. Core count and price is per processor: 2P Intel Xeon Gold_6256 (12c); score of 198 and price of $3,900 for a $/perf of $39.39 and perf/$ of 0.025;
8.25 perf/core; http://spec.org/cpu2017/results/res2020q1/cpu2017-20200217-20908.pdf. 2P Intel Xeon Gold_6250 (8c); score of 139 and price of $3,400 for a $/perf of 10.12 and perf/$ of 0.099; 3.51 perf/core;
http://spec.org/cpu2017/results/res2020q1/cpu2017-20200217-20893.pdf. Pricing in USD. AMD pricing 1kU, Intel pricing from ark.intel.com. SPEC® and SPECrate® are registered trademarks of Standard Performance
EvaluationCorporation. Learn more at spec.org. ROM-602
22. EPYC™ HIGH FREQUENCY ANNOUNCEMENT REVIEWERS BRIEFING | MARCH, 2020 – AMD CONFIDENTIAL – NDA REQUIRED
[AMD Official Use Only - Internal Distribution Only]
ROM-603: SPECrate®2017_int_base estimated results as of March 24, 2020. Pricing 1kU as of March 24, 2020. Core count and price is per processor: 2P AMD EPYC™ 7F72 (24c); estimated score of 383 est. and price of
$2,450 for a $/perf of $12.79 and perf/$ of 0.078; 7.98 perf/core; 2P AMD EPYC™ 7F52 (16c); estimated score of 286 est. and price of $3,100 for a $/perf of $21.68 and perf/$ of 0.046; 8.94 perf/core; 2P AMD EPYC™ 7F32
(8c); estimated score of 153 est. and price of $2,100 for a $/perf of $27.45and perf/$ of 0.036; 9.56 perf/core; Pricing in USD. AMD pricing 1kU. SPEC® and SPECrate® are registered trademarks of Standard Performance
EvaluationCorporation. Learn more at spec.org. ROM-603
ROM-618: Pricingand scores as of March 9, 2020. Proportional compare done by normalizingall Perf / $ to the EPYC™ 7F72 number by dividing all Perf/$ numbers by the EPYC 7F72 Perf (est) /$ number. All pricing and cores
are per processor. 2P AMD EPYC™ 7F72 (24c); estimated score of 383 and price of $2,450 for a $/perf(est) of $12.79 and perf(est)/$ of 0.078; 7.98 per(est)/core; 0.078 / 0.078 = 1.00; 2P Intel Xeon Gold_6248R (24c), score of
309 and price of $2,700 for a $/perf of $17.48 and perf/$ of 0.057; 6.44 perf/core; 0.057 / 0.078 = 0.73; http://spec.org/cpu2017/results/res2020q1/cpu2017-20200203-20817.pdf. 2P Intel Xeon Platinum_8268 (24c), score
of 316 and price of $6,302 for a $/perf of $39.89 and perf/$ of 0.025; 6.58 perf/core; 0.025 / 0.078 = 0.32; http://spec.org/cpu2017/results/res2019q2/cpu2017-20190524-14465.pdf. 2P AMD EPYC™ 7352 (24c); score of
325 and price of $1,350 for a $/perf of $8.31 and a perf/$ of 0.120; 6.77 perf/core; 0.120 / 0.078 = 1.54; http://spec.org/cpu2017/results/res2020q1/cpu2017-20191218-20397.pdf. 2P AMD EPYC™ 7402 (24c); score of 353
and a price of $1,783 for a $/perf of $10.10 and perf/$ of 0.099; 7.35 perf/core; 0.099 / 0.078 = 1.27; http://spec.org/cpu2017/results/res2020q1/cpu2017-20191220-20429.pdf. 2P AMD EPYC™ 7F72 (24c); estimated score
of 383 and price of $2,450 for a $/perf(est) of $12.79 and perf(est)/$ of 0.078; 7.98 per(est)/core; 0.078 / 0.078 = 1.00; Pricingin USD. Intel pricing AMD pricing 1kU. SPEC® and SPECrate® are registered trademarks of
Standard PerformanceEvaluation Corporation. Learn more at spec.org. ROM-618
ROM-619: Pricingand scores as of March 9, 2020. Proportional compare done by normalizingall Perf / $ to the EPYC™ 7F52 number by dividing all Perf/$ numbers by the EPYC 7F52 Perf(est)/$ number. 2P AMD EPYC™ 7F52
(16c); estimated score of 286 and price of $3,100 for a $/perf(est) of $21.68 and perf(est)/$ of 0.046; 8.94 perf(est)/core;0.046 / 0.046 = 1.00. 2P Intel Xeon Gold_6226R (16c); score of 209 and price of $1,300 for a $/perf of
$12.44 and perf/$ of 0.080; 6.53 perf/core; 0.080 / 0.046 = 1.74; http://spec.org/cpu2017/results/res2020q1/cpu2017-20200203-20807.pdf. 2P Intel Xeon Gold_6242 (16c), score of 222 and price of $2,529 for a $/perf of
$22.78 and perf/$ of 0.044; 6.94 perf/core; 0.044 / 0.046 = 0.95; http://spec.org/cpu2017/results/res2019q3/cpu2017-20190819-17115.pdf. 2P Intel Xeon Gold_6246R (16c), score of 241 and price of $3,286 for a $/perf of
$27.27 and perf/$ of 0.037; 7.53 perf/core; 0.037 / 0.046 = 0.80 http://spec.org/cpu2017/results/res2020q1/cpu2017-20200203-20785.pdf. 2P AMD EPYC™ 7302 (16c); score of 246 and price of $978 for a $/perf of $7.95
and a perf/$ of 0.126; 7.69 perf/core; 0.126 / 0.046 = 2.74 http://spec.org/cpu2017/results/res2020q1/cpu2017-20191220-20441.pdf. 2P AMD EPYC™ 7F52 (16c); estimated score of 286 and price of $3,100 for a $/perf(est)
of $21.68 and perf(est)/$ of 0.046; 8.94 perf(est)/core;0.046 / 0.046 = 1.00. Pricingin USD . AMD pricing 1kU. SPEC® and SPECrate® are registered trademarks of Standard PerformanceEvaluation Corporation. Learn more at
spec.org. ROM-619
ROM-620: Pricingand scores as of March 9, 2020. Proportional compare done by normalizingall Perf / $ to the EPYC™ 7F32 number by dividing all Perf/$ numbers by the EPYC 7F32 Perf(est)/$ number. 2P AMD EPYC™
7F32 (8c); estimated score of 153 and price of $2,100 for a $/perf(est) of $27.45and perf(est)/$ of 0.036; 9.56 perf(est)/core;0.036 / 0.036 = 1.00. 2P Intel Xeon Gold_6234 (8c); score of 128 and price of $2,214 for a $/perf
of $34.59 and perf/$ of 0.029; 8.00 perf/core; 0.029 / 0.036 = 0.81 http://spec.org/cpu2017/results/res2019q2/cpu2017-20190611-15291.pdf. 2P AMD EPYC™ 7262 (8c); score of 134 and price of $575 for a $/perf of $8.58
and a perf/$ of 0.117; 8.38 perf/core; 0.117 / 0.036 = 3.25 http://spec.org/cpu2017/results/res2019q3/cpu2017-20190902-17341.pdf. 2P Intel Xeon Gold_6250 (8c); score of 139 and price of $3,400 for a $/perf of 10.12
and perf/$ of 0.099; 3.51 perf/core; 0.020 / 0.036 = 0.56 http://spec.org/cpu2017/results/res2020q1/cpu2017-20200217-20893.pdf. 2P Intel Xeon Gold_6244 (8c), score of 144 and price of $2,925 for a $/perf of $40.63 and
perf/$ of 0.025; 9.00 perf/core; 0.025 / 0.036 = 0.69 http://spec.org/cpu2017/results/res2019q2/cpu2017-20190528-14871.pdf. 2P AMD EPYC™ 7F32 (8c); estimated score of 153 and price of $2,100 for a $/perf(est) of
$27.45and perf(est)/$ of 0.036; 9.56 perf(est)/core;0.036 / 0.036 = 1.00. Pricingin USD. AMD pricing 1kU. SPEC® and SPECrate® are registered trademarks of Standard PerformanceEvaluationCorporation. Learn more at
spec.org. ROM-620
ROM-621: A 2P AMD EPYC™ 7F32 powered server has the highest performance(est)/ core at 9.56 vs. all other x86 2P scores published by SPEC.org, using 2P SPECrate®2017_int_base data as of March 9, 2020. The next
highest performance / core score is 9.00 for a 2P 8 core Intel Gold 6244 based server with a score of 144, http://spec.org/cpu2017/results/res2019q2/cpu2017-20190528-14871.pdf. Performance/ core for each CPU model
is calculated by taking the highest 2P SPECrate®2017_int_base score for that processor model on the date indicated and dividingit by the (number of cores per processor x 2) to get the score for each processor. EPYC 7F32
SPECrate®2017_int_base estimate is based on internal reference platform measurement. SPEC® and SPECrate® are registered trademarks of Standard PerformanceEvaluationCorporation. Learn more at spec.org. ROM-621
ROM-639: Highest 4-node performancein the world based on VMmark® 3.1 vSAN™ score. 2x EPYC 7F72 scoring 13.27 @ 14 tiles (192 total cores, www.vmware.com/####)compared to the next highest 192 total cores
result 1x EPYC 7702P scoring 12.23 @ 13 tiles, https://www.vmware.com/content/dam/digitalmarketing/vmware/en/pdf/vmmark/2019-08-07-HPE-ProLiant-DL325Gen10.pdf)as of 4/14/20. VMmark® is a product of
VMware, Inc. ROM-639