This document provides a training module on best practices for land trust stewardship. It covers topics such as baseline documentation reporting, monitoring, landowner relations, and funding stewardship in perpetuity. The module outlines guidelines from the Canadian Land Trust Alliance and Alberta Land Trust Alliance on proper procedures for conservation easements and fee simple land ownership. It emphasizes the importance of thorough documentation, consistent monitoring, and positive landowner communication to ensure conservation values are protected over the long term.
The document discusses the regulatory context and process for in-lieu fee (ILF) programs as a form of compensatory wetland mitigation. It notes that the current wetland mitigation process often fails to offset lost wetland functions. An ILF program allows developers to purchase credits from a governmental or non-profit sponsor to satisfy mitigation requirements, transferring responsibility for mitigation success to the sponsor. The document provides details on Thurston County, Washington's ILF program, including watershed characterization, mitigation site selection criteria, program components, timelines, and current progress developing the required prospectus, instrument, and agreement.
The document provides an overview of Hazard Mitigation Assistance (HMA) grants administered by the Rhode Island Emergency Management Agency. It discusses the various HMA grant programs including Pre-Disaster Mitigation (PDM), Flood Mitigation Assistance (FMA), and Hazard Mitigation Grant Program (HMGP). Eligible project activities are outlined for each program. The application process and requirements for local and state governments to receive funding such as having an approved hazard mitigation plan and providing cost share are also summarized.
This document provides recommendations for FLT's Baseline Documentation Report (BDR) and Monitoring Report procedures and templates. It recommends that BDRs be prepared by qualified professionals and include components like the property description, conservation values, and threats. Monitoring should ideally occur annually and be documented in reports addressing compliance with the conservation easement and noting any issues. The document also recommends FLT develop guidelines for their volunteer-based monitoring program to help manage an increasing portfolio of properties. Templates for the BDR and Monitoring Report are provided in appendices.
Several bills were introduced relating to flood planning, notification, and preparedness as well as eminent domain reform. For flood issues, bills addressed statewide planning and funding, creating notification systems for dam releases and disasters, and conducting local infrastructure studies. Reforms for eminent domain included new meeting requirements, survey notice standards, clarifying "actual progress" criteria, and allowing landowners to recover damages from adjacent easement uses.
The document discusses adopting the Bexar County Hazard Mitigation Plan, which is required to be eligible for pre-disaster and post-disaster funding from FEMA. It provides background on the plan, including that it identifies natural and human-caused hazards in Bexar County, assesses capabilities to implement mitigation projects, and considers projects eligible for funding to mitigate hazards like flooding, wildfires, and storms. Adopting the plan would allow Bexar County and participating jurisdictions to directly apply to FEMA for certain grant funding.
FUDS: Uncharted Territory in Brownfields Remediation and Redevelopmentsbligh0101
The document discusses financing options for remediating Formerly Used Defense Sites (FUDS). FUDS are properties formerly owned or used by the Department of Defense that require environmental cleanup. Traditional options for financing FUDS remediation include EPA Brownfields grants, stimulus funds, and public-private partnerships. Emerging options discussed include negotiated settlements with the Army Corps of Engineers to share cleanup costs, and litigation to recover costs from the government. The document provides details on the processes for negotiated settlements and cost recovery litigation.
The digipak for The Sisters of Mercy's single "This Corrosion" features mainly black colors with white text to stand out. It includes images of the band members wearing typical gothic clothing along with a stormy sky background fitting the atmospheric sound of the single. More space is given to mentioning Andrew Eldritch's own record label "Merciful Release" compared to other institutions involved, as he would want to promote his own label for his band.
December 2011 The Year Past The Year Ahead drumbaugh
This document provides a summary of the economic conditions and outlook for Ventura County in 2011 and 2012. Some key points:
- Unemployment remains high at 10.1% but is trending downward. Housing sales have plateaued and foreclosures continue to be an issue.
- While some businesses have downsized or left the county, others have opened new facilities bringing jobs. The economy is looking a little brighter with some sectors beginning to hire again.
- Things to watch in 2012 include the impact of defense budget cuts on the naval base, uncertainty around changes to the Panama Canal, and challenges in the bio-tech industry following layoffs at Amgen.
- Educational institutions are facing budget
The document discusses the regulatory context and process for in-lieu fee (ILF) programs as a form of compensatory wetland mitigation. It notes that the current wetland mitigation process often fails to offset lost wetland functions. An ILF program allows developers to purchase credits from a governmental or non-profit sponsor to satisfy mitigation requirements, transferring responsibility for mitigation success to the sponsor. The document provides details on Thurston County, Washington's ILF program, including watershed characterization, mitigation site selection criteria, program components, timelines, and current progress developing the required prospectus, instrument, and agreement.
The document provides an overview of Hazard Mitigation Assistance (HMA) grants administered by the Rhode Island Emergency Management Agency. It discusses the various HMA grant programs including Pre-Disaster Mitigation (PDM), Flood Mitigation Assistance (FMA), and Hazard Mitigation Grant Program (HMGP). Eligible project activities are outlined for each program. The application process and requirements for local and state governments to receive funding such as having an approved hazard mitigation plan and providing cost share are also summarized.
This document provides recommendations for FLT's Baseline Documentation Report (BDR) and Monitoring Report procedures and templates. It recommends that BDRs be prepared by qualified professionals and include components like the property description, conservation values, and threats. Monitoring should ideally occur annually and be documented in reports addressing compliance with the conservation easement and noting any issues. The document also recommends FLT develop guidelines for their volunteer-based monitoring program to help manage an increasing portfolio of properties. Templates for the BDR and Monitoring Report are provided in appendices.
Several bills were introduced relating to flood planning, notification, and preparedness as well as eminent domain reform. For flood issues, bills addressed statewide planning and funding, creating notification systems for dam releases and disasters, and conducting local infrastructure studies. Reforms for eminent domain included new meeting requirements, survey notice standards, clarifying "actual progress" criteria, and allowing landowners to recover damages from adjacent easement uses.
The document discusses adopting the Bexar County Hazard Mitigation Plan, which is required to be eligible for pre-disaster and post-disaster funding from FEMA. It provides background on the plan, including that it identifies natural and human-caused hazards in Bexar County, assesses capabilities to implement mitigation projects, and considers projects eligible for funding to mitigate hazards like flooding, wildfires, and storms. Adopting the plan would allow Bexar County and participating jurisdictions to directly apply to FEMA for certain grant funding.
FUDS: Uncharted Territory in Brownfields Remediation and Redevelopmentsbligh0101
The document discusses financing options for remediating Formerly Used Defense Sites (FUDS). FUDS are properties formerly owned or used by the Department of Defense that require environmental cleanup. Traditional options for financing FUDS remediation include EPA Brownfields grants, stimulus funds, and public-private partnerships. Emerging options discussed include negotiated settlements with the Army Corps of Engineers to share cleanup costs, and litigation to recover costs from the government. The document provides details on the processes for negotiated settlements and cost recovery litigation.
The digipak for The Sisters of Mercy's single "This Corrosion" features mainly black colors with white text to stand out. It includes images of the band members wearing typical gothic clothing along with a stormy sky background fitting the atmospheric sound of the single. More space is given to mentioning Andrew Eldritch's own record label "Merciful Release" compared to other institutions involved, as he would want to promote his own label for his band.
December 2011 The Year Past The Year Ahead drumbaugh
This document provides a summary of the economic conditions and outlook for Ventura County in 2011 and 2012. Some key points:
- Unemployment remains high at 10.1% but is trending downward. Housing sales have plateaued and foreclosures continue to be an issue.
- While some businesses have downsized or left the county, others have opened new facilities bringing jobs. The economy is looking a little brighter with some sectors beginning to hire again.
- Things to watch in 2012 include the impact of defense budget cuts on the naval base, uncertainty around changes to the Panama Canal, and challenges in the bio-tech industry following layoffs at Amgen.
- Educational institutions are facing budget
This document provides guidance on baseline documentation reports (BDRs) for conservation easements and fee simple properties. It discusses when BDRs should be completed, who should complete them, and their critical components. For conservation easements, BDRs should be completed before finalizing the agreement and must thoroughly document the property conditions to defend the easement. For fee simple properties, BDRs provide a basis for future management and can be completed within one year of securing the property. Both require documenting the property conditions, but conservation easement BDRs must address all easement terms while fee simple BDRs focus on natural features for management.
This document provides information on monitoring conservation properties. It discusses the importance of monitoring to determine changes or threats to conservation values. Monitoring conservation easements is especially important to ensure the objectives of the easement agreement are being met and demonstrate due diligence if the easement needs defending. While there is no legal requirement for monitoring frequency in Alberta, conservation easements should generally be monitored annually or at least every few years. More frequent monitoring may be needed when certain risks are present. Regular monitoring is critical for various reasons, including early detection of violations and demonstrating a land trust is meeting its obligations.
This document provides an overview of dedicated stewardship funding for land trusts. It discusses the importance of long-term stewardship for land conservation goals and credibility. Land trusts need to understand future financial obligations for monitoring conservation easements and managing land in order to fulfill promises to protect land in perpetuity. Options for funding stewardship include establishing a dedicated fund or paying costs from annual operating budgets. The document also defines key terms and recommends separate funds for routine stewardship and legal defense to prepare for unpredictable legal expenses.
Presentation by Florence Bernard and Slayde Hawkins.
PES may be prohibited by Constitution or law. This presentation discusses how policy may affect the implementation of PES and REDD projects.
Owner Tenant Engagement in Sustainable Property InvestingJosh Develop
This article discusses examples of property owner-tenant engagement activities aimed at furthering sustainable and responsible property investing. It focuses on eight case studies from companies in the US, Europe, and Australia that demonstrate ways for property owners and tenants to cooperate on sustainability issues. One example highlighted is Land Securities, a large UK real estate company. Land Securities obtained agreements called Memorandums of Understanding from tenants in one building to collaborate on sustainability measures like sharing energy use data, setting reduction targets, and implementing initiatives around waste, water, energy, and transportation. The goal is to improve environmental performance and make sustainability efforts more cost-effective through cooperation between owners and occupants.
Local Nature Recovery Strategies (LNRSs) are being piloted in 5 English counties to develop a framework for restoring and connecting habitats across England. Each LNRS will map valuable habitats, priorities for nature's recovery, and specific proposals to create or improve habitat. They aim to identify practical actions to deliver a national Nature Recovery Network and track progress over time. LNRSs will not be binding but public bodies will be required to consider them and report on steps taken to support their goals. The pilots will inform national implementation of LNRSs once the Environment Bill is passed.
Conservation easements are voluntary legal agreements that landowners enter into to permanently limit the uses of their land in order to protect its conservation values. They allow landowners to prevent development on their land while still retaining private ownership. When easements are donated, landowners may receive tax deductions. Easements are held and monitored by land trusts or government agencies to ensure the terms are followed. They are a useful tool for preserving farmland, scenic areas, natural habitats and places of historic significance.
This document provides recommendations for land trusts regarding stewardship, enforcement, and legal defense of conservation easements. It discusses best practices for developing policies and procedures to handle violations of conservation easements. Key points include maintaining positive relationships with landowners, clearly written easement documents, developing a violation resolution process, and having funds available for legal defense if needed. While litigation should be a last resort, land trusts must be prepared to enforce easements in court to uphold their purpose. External factors like increasing land values can also influence the risk of an easement being challenged.
This document provides an overview of carbon credits and the carbon markets ecosystem. It discusses that carbon markets can help enhance climate action by targeting lowest-cost emissions reductions. Carbon credits financially incentivize emission reduction activities and address mismatches in resources and timing needed to reach net-zero goals. The document outlines key elements of high-integrity carbon credits, including additionality, permanence, quantification, and sustainable development benefits. It also notes risks to companies from improper use of offsets and calls for understanding both potential and limitations of this tool to support increased integrity in voluntary carbon markets.
This document provides recommendations to Foothills Land Trust (FLT) on establishing policies and procedures for stewardship, enforcement, and legal defense costs related to conservation easements. It recommends that FLT: 1) maintain healthy landowner relations, clearly document easement details, and establish a violation policy to reduce risks; 2) use a stewardship calculator to determine annual monitoring and relationship building costs; and 3) consider a communal legal defense approach through resources like a learning center and insurance to help address potential violations or challenges. Implementing best practices for stewardship, documentation, and policies can help reduce risks over time.
FINANCING STORMWATER RETROFITS IN PHILADELPHIA AND BEYONDU.S. Water Alliance
Traditional means for stormwater infrastructure finance, such as bond issues, federal and state dollars—are becoming increasingly untenable, and it seems inevitable that private investment will be needed as cities contemplate future stormwater management planning. This presentation will discuss Philadelphia’s plan to use GI to mitigate stormwater run-off and how its parcel-based stormwater billing and credit system may present significant opportunities for private investors in local GI investment.
ARCHIBUS White Paper - The Federal Real Property Reduction GoalMichael Willette
The document discusses strategies for federal agencies to meet presidential goals of reducing excess real property and improving space utilization. It outlines initiatives like accelerating identification and disposal of excess assets, improving use of existing space through increased occupancy and alternative workplace strategies like telework. The document recommends using integrated workplace management system software to compile accurate space data, identify underused space, and establish benchmarks to optimize space and reduce facility costs.
The clearing of native vegetation on rural land in NSW is not effectively regulated and managed. There are processes to approve land clearing but limited follow up to ensure compliance. The native vegetation regulatory map that guides landholders has not been fully released, making it difficult to identify regulated land. There are significant delays in identifying unlawful clearing, and few penalties imposed despite many reported instances. While land clearing has increased, conservation investment has also grown though regional funding allocations are not always consistent with identified priorities. Overall the processes in place to support the regulatory framework are weak.
Plan Vivo project idea note (pin) template & guidanceFundación Col
El estándar Plan Vivo es una certificación de programas de pago por servicios ambientales (PSA) orientados a la comunidad y que busca mejorar la gestión de sus recursos naturales. Plan Vivo ofrece un marco para la transacción equitativa de servicios ambientales con comunidades y facilita el acceso a diversas fuentes de financiación y mercados, incluidos los créditos voluntarios de carbono.
The document outlines 10 goals for implementing green leasing to promote sustainability efforts in commercial buildings. The goals are to clarify the rationale for sustainability, reach consensus among stakeholders, define the scope and boundaries of sustainability programs, standardize lease language, establish documentation and metrics, set enforcement protocols, incentivize collaboration, commit to measurement, determine certification strategies, and allocate costs of green initiatives. Achieving consensus on sustainability goals and outlining specific landlord and tenant responsibilities are keys to successful green leasing.
This document provides information about establishing and operating a stormwater utility. Some key points:
- Over 1,700 stormwater utilities operate in the US, ranging from populations of 88 to over 3 million served.
- Utilities are created by ordinance and provide dedicated funding for stormwater management services.
- Services typically include infrastructure, permitting compliance, education, and more.
- Fees are usually based on impervious surface area using an Equivalent Residential Unit. Credits can incentivize green infrastructure.
- Partnerships can help smaller municipalities by sharing services, equipment, and expertise. Various financing options are also available.
Plan Vivo Project Idea Note (PIN) Template & GuidanceFundación Col
El estándar Plan Vivo es una certificación de programas de pago por servicios ambientales (PSA) orientados a la comunidad y que busca mejorar la gestión de sus recursos naturales. Plan Vivo ofrece un marco para la transacción equitativa de servicios ambientales con comunidades y facilita el acceso a diversas fuentes de financiación y mercados, incluidos los créditos voluntarios de carbono.
Executive Order 120 establishes the Build Back Better Task Force to oversee post-disaster rehabilitation and recovery efforts in areas affected by typhoons. The Task Force is chaired by the DENR Secretary and composed of heads of various government agencies. It has the following key functions: expediting rehabilitation and recovery programs, ensuring basic services, rebuilding resilient housing, restoring livelihoods, and strengthening infrastructure and local governance. The order defines the Task Force's key result areas as: 1) better and resilient infrastructure, 2) stronger shelter and settlements, 3) improved essential services, and 4) restored sustainable livelihoods. It provides funding, support requirements, and reporting procedures for the Task Force.
This document outlines 10 goals for incorporating environmental sustainability into commercial leasing agreements, known as "green leasing." It discusses the importance of gaining consensus between landlords and tenants on sustainability goals and metrics. Key recommendations include assembling a set of supplemental documents to more comprehensively define the sustainability program, establishing quantifiable requirements and enforcement protocols, and clarifying how costs will be allocated for green investments and certifications. The overall aim is for landlords and tenants to collaborate on sustainability through transparent goal-setting, measurement, and shared responsibilities.
Implementing Finance Insurance Standards Us Forest Marketguskent
Gabriel Thoumi (Forest Carbon Offsets LLC), Augustus Kent (CO2RS), and Colm Fay (Erb Institute, University of Michigan) sat down on June 29, 2010, to discuss how forest carbon in the US is maturing in terms of finance and insurance standards and how the adoption of these standards can change the face of risk management for forest carbon projects and assets.
The baseline documentation report provides a snapshot of the biophysical condition of a conserved property and represents an agreement between the land trust and landowner. It documents the conservation value and current conditions to inform monitoring, enforcement, and legal defense. The report includes sections on property background, conservation purpose, anthropogenic features and land uses, and natural features to establish the baseline conditions. Maintaining strong landowner relations is a priority, so landowners should participate in the baseline process.
More Related Content
Similar to Alberta land trust 2009 03 4 of 6-best stewardship practises
This document provides guidance on baseline documentation reports (BDRs) for conservation easements and fee simple properties. It discusses when BDRs should be completed, who should complete them, and their critical components. For conservation easements, BDRs should be completed before finalizing the agreement and must thoroughly document the property conditions to defend the easement. For fee simple properties, BDRs provide a basis for future management and can be completed within one year of securing the property. Both require documenting the property conditions, but conservation easement BDRs must address all easement terms while fee simple BDRs focus on natural features for management.
This document provides information on monitoring conservation properties. It discusses the importance of monitoring to determine changes or threats to conservation values. Monitoring conservation easements is especially important to ensure the objectives of the easement agreement are being met and demonstrate due diligence if the easement needs defending. While there is no legal requirement for monitoring frequency in Alberta, conservation easements should generally be monitored annually or at least every few years. More frequent monitoring may be needed when certain risks are present. Regular monitoring is critical for various reasons, including early detection of violations and demonstrating a land trust is meeting its obligations.
This document provides an overview of dedicated stewardship funding for land trusts. It discusses the importance of long-term stewardship for land conservation goals and credibility. Land trusts need to understand future financial obligations for monitoring conservation easements and managing land in order to fulfill promises to protect land in perpetuity. Options for funding stewardship include establishing a dedicated fund or paying costs from annual operating budgets. The document also defines key terms and recommends separate funds for routine stewardship and legal defense to prepare for unpredictable legal expenses.
Presentation by Florence Bernard and Slayde Hawkins.
PES may be prohibited by Constitution or law. This presentation discusses how policy may affect the implementation of PES and REDD projects.
Owner Tenant Engagement in Sustainable Property InvestingJosh Develop
This article discusses examples of property owner-tenant engagement activities aimed at furthering sustainable and responsible property investing. It focuses on eight case studies from companies in the US, Europe, and Australia that demonstrate ways for property owners and tenants to cooperate on sustainability issues. One example highlighted is Land Securities, a large UK real estate company. Land Securities obtained agreements called Memorandums of Understanding from tenants in one building to collaborate on sustainability measures like sharing energy use data, setting reduction targets, and implementing initiatives around waste, water, energy, and transportation. The goal is to improve environmental performance and make sustainability efforts more cost-effective through cooperation between owners and occupants.
Local Nature Recovery Strategies (LNRSs) are being piloted in 5 English counties to develop a framework for restoring and connecting habitats across England. Each LNRS will map valuable habitats, priorities for nature's recovery, and specific proposals to create or improve habitat. They aim to identify practical actions to deliver a national Nature Recovery Network and track progress over time. LNRSs will not be binding but public bodies will be required to consider them and report on steps taken to support their goals. The pilots will inform national implementation of LNRSs once the Environment Bill is passed.
Conservation easements are voluntary legal agreements that landowners enter into to permanently limit the uses of their land in order to protect its conservation values. They allow landowners to prevent development on their land while still retaining private ownership. When easements are donated, landowners may receive tax deductions. Easements are held and monitored by land trusts or government agencies to ensure the terms are followed. They are a useful tool for preserving farmland, scenic areas, natural habitats and places of historic significance.
This document provides recommendations for land trusts regarding stewardship, enforcement, and legal defense of conservation easements. It discusses best practices for developing policies and procedures to handle violations of conservation easements. Key points include maintaining positive relationships with landowners, clearly written easement documents, developing a violation resolution process, and having funds available for legal defense if needed. While litigation should be a last resort, land trusts must be prepared to enforce easements in court to uphold their purpose. External factors like increasing land values can also influence the risk of an easement being challenged.
This document provides an overview of carbon credits and the carbon markets ecosystem. It discusses that carbon markets can help enhance climate action by targeting lowest-cost emissions reductions. Carbon credits financially incentivize emission reduction activities and address mismatches in resources and timing needed to reach net-zero goals. The document outlines key elements of high-integrity carbon credits, including additionality, permanence, quantification, and sustainable development benefits. It also notes risks to companies from improper use of offsets and calls for understanding both potential and limitations of this tool to support increased integrity in voluntary carbon markets.
This document provides recommendations to Foothills Land Trust (FLT) on establishing policies and procedures for stewardship, enforcement, and legal defense costs related to conservation easements. It recommends that FLT: 1) maintain healthy landowner relations, clearly document easement details, and establish a violation policy to reduce risks; 2) use a stewardship calculator to determine annual monitoring and relationship building costs; and 3) consider a communal legal defense approach through resources like a learning center and insurance to help address potential violations or challenges. Implementing best practices for stewardship, documentation, and policies can help reduce risks over time.
FINANCING STORMWATER RETROFITS IN PHILADELPHIA AND BEYONDU.S. Water Alliance
Traditional means for stormwater infrastructure finance, such as bond issues, federal and state dollars—are becoming increasingly untenable, and it seems inevitable that private investment will be needed as cities contemplate future stormwater management planning. This presentation will discuss Philadelphia’s plan to use GI to mitigate stormwater run-off and how its parcel-based stormwater billing and credit system may present significant opportunities for private investors in local GI investment.
ARCHIBUS White Paper - The Federal Real Property Reduction GoalMichael Willette
The document discusses strategies for federal agencies to meet presidential goals of reducing excess real property and improving space utilization. It outlines initiatives like accelerating identification and disposal of excess assets, improving use of existing space through increased occupancy and alternative workplace strategies like telework. The document recommends using integrated workplace management system software to compile accurate space data, identify underused space, and establish benchmarks to optimize space and reduce facility costs.
The clearing of native vegetation on rural land in NSW is not effectively regulated and managed. There are processes to approve land clearing but limited follow up to ensure compliance. The native vegetation regulatory map that guides landholders has not been fully released, making it difficult to identify regulated land. There are significant delays in identifying unlawful clearing, and few penalties imposed despite many reported instances. While land clearing has increased, conservation investment has also grown though regional funding allocations are not always consistent with identified priorities. Overall the processes in place to support the regulatory framework are weak.
Plan Vivo project idea note (pin) template & guidanceFundación Col
El estándar Plan Vivo es una certificación de programas de pago por servicios ambientales (PSA) orientados a la comunidad y que busca mejorar la gestión de sus recursos naturales. Plan Vivo ofrece un marco para la transacción equitativa de servicios ambientales con comunidades y facilita el acceso a diversas fuentes de financiación y mercados, incluidos los créditos voluntarios de carbono.
The document outlines 10 goals for implementing green leasing to promote sustainability efforts in commercial buildings. The goals are to clarify the rationale for sustainability, reach consensus among stakeholders, define the scope and boundaries of sustainability programs, standardize lease language, establish documentation and metrics, set enforcement protocols, incentivize collaboration, commit to measurement, determine certification strategies, and allocate costs of green initiatives. Achieving consensus on sustainability goals and outlining specific landlord and tenant responsibilities are keys to successful green leasing.
This document provides information about establishing and operating a stormwater utility. Some key points:
- Over 1,700 stormwater utilities operate in the US, ranging from populations of 88 to over 3 million served.
- Utilities are created by ordinance and provide dedicated funding for stormwater management services.
- Services typically include infrastructure, permitting compliance, education, and more.
- Fees are usually based on impervious surface area using an Equivalent Residential Unit. Credits can incentivize green infrastructure.
- Partnerships can help smaller municipalities by sharing services, equipment, and expertise. Various financing options are also available.
Plan Vivo Project Idea Note (PIN) Template & GuidanceFundación Col
El estándar Plan Vivo es una certificación de programas de pago por servicios ambientales (PSA) orientados a la comunidad y que busca mejorar la gestión de sus recursos naturales. Plan Vivo ofrece un marco para la transacción equitativa de servicios ambientales con comunidades y facilita el acceso a diversas fuentes de financiación y mercados, incluidos los créditos voluntarios de carbono.
Executive Order 120 establishes the Build Back Better Task Force to oversee post-disaster rehabilitation and recovery efforts in areas affected by typhoons. The Task Force is chaired by the DENR Secretary and composed of heads of various government agencies. It has the following key functions: expediting rehabilitation and recovery programs, ensuring basic services, rebuilding resilient housing, restoring livelihoods, and strengthening infrastructure and local governance. The order defines the Task Force's key result areas as: 1) better and resilient infrastructure, 2) stronger shelter and settlements, 3) improved essential services, and 4) restored sustainable livelihoods. It provides funding, support requirements, and reporting procedures for the Task Force.
This document outlines 10 goals for incorporating environmental sustainability into commercial leasing agreements, known as "green leasing." It discusses the importance of gaining consensus between landlords and tenants on sustainability goals and metrics. Key recommendations include assembling a set of supplemental documents to more comprehensively define the sustainability program, establishing quantifiable requirements and enforcement protocols, and clarifying how costs will be allocated for green investments and certifications. The overall aim is for landlords and tenants to collaborate on sustainability through transparent goal-setting, measurement, and shared responsibilities.
Implementing Finance Insurance Standards Us Forest Marketguskent
Gabriel Thoumi (Forest Carbon Offsets LLC), Augustus Kent (CO2RS), and Colm Fay (Erb Institute, University of Michigan) sat down on June 29, 2010, to discuss how forest carbon in the US is maturing in terms of finance and insurance standards and how the adoption of these standards can change the face of risk management for forest carbon projects and assets.
Similar to Alberta land trust 2009 03 4 of 6-best stewardship practises (20)
The baseline documentation report provides a snapshot of the biophysical condition of a conserved property and represents an agreement between the land trust and landowner. It documents the conservation value and current conditions to inform monitoring, enforcement, and legal defense. The report includes sections on property background, conservation purpose, anthropogenic features and land uses, and natural features to establish the baseline conditions. Maintaining strong landowner relations is a priority, so landowners should participate in the baseline process.
This document provides a summary of beneficial management practices for land development in Alberta. It outlines management practices for energy development from documents such as the Alberta Energy and Utilities Board Native Prairie Guidelines. It also summarizes management practices for agriculture from the Alberta Agriculture Environmental Manual for Livestock Producers. The document is intended to help land trusts identify appropriate management practices to address conservation goals and make informed choices when practices may conflict. It notes that best practices evolve as knowledge increases and vary between ecoregions.
The document discusses reimagining neighborhoods to be more sustainable. It covers topics like the characteristics of sustainable neighborhoods, including social well-being, governance, transportation, green spaces, local economy, density, services, and diversity. The presentation provides information on making neighborhoods more vibrant and livable through compact design, mixed uses, accessibility, and engaging the community.
This document provides an introduction to the concept of sustainable neighborhoods. It discusses that neighborhoods are the building blocks of society but many current neighborhoods face social, economic, and environmental challenges that threaten quality of life. The document defines sustainability as meeting present needs without compromising future generations' ability to meet their own needs. It outlines four root causes of unsustainability: depleting natural resources, producing substances that accumulate in nature, damaging natural systems, and societies where people cannot meet basic needs. The document suggests that sustainable neighborhoods address all quality of life factors while also designing within planetary boundaries to ensure long-term viability.
This document provides a toolkit to help Canadians make more sustainable choices in their everyday home decisions. It discusses how small decisions can collectively help Alberta lead in sustainability and addresses environmental issues like climate change and water supply. The toolkit explains sustainability, the four root causes of unsustainability, and provides tips for making sustainable choices related to utilities, mobility, shopping, and waste in each room of the home.
This document summarizes research on carsharing in the Greater Forest Lawn area of Calgary, Alberta. It finds that carsharing allows members access to vehicles without the full costs of ownership. Carsharing benefits users by reducing transportation costs, increasing flexibility and access compared to transit. The research found carsharing users engaged in more "trip chaining" of multiple activities into single trips. It also allowed better coordination of travel and activity times. This expanded the scope of activities users could participate in.
The document discusses the value of natural capital such as wetlands, forests, and green spaces. It notes that degradation of natural areas can negatively impact property values, increase costs of issues like water treatment, and reduce agricultural production. Conversely, the presence of natural areas is found to increase nearby property values and provide other economic and social benefits. The document provides examples of studies that have quantified such impacts and benefits. It advocates for considering natural capital in decision making and accounting.
The document provides guidance on fund development for charitable organizations. It discusses the importance of having a clear mission and vision, understanding costs, and viewing fundraising from the donor's perspective. Effective fundraising communicates how the organization will fulfill its mission and meet community needs. It also stresses the importance of building relationships with donors and maintaining contact through stewardship.
This document analyzes private land conservation opportunities in Alberta's Bow Valley to help maintain habitat connectivity for wildlife. The Bow Valley provides important habitat and a movement corridor between protected areas, but development is fragmenting the landscape. The report identifies priority private lands for conservation through easements, land swaps, or acquisitions to enhance habitat connectivity between parks and reserves and allow wildlife to move through the valley. Mapping of wildlife movement and habitat data was used to identify new potential wildlife corridors and priority lands for conservation.
Sustainable Action Canmore was a community-wide social marketing program in Canmore, Alberta that aimed to encourage residents to adopt more environmentally sustainable behaviors. The program utilized in-person canvassing to ask residents to commit to one sustainable action, provided incentives like reusable bags and energy efficient light bulbs, and followed up by phone to encourage further actions. Over 6,100 homes were visited with a 51% response rate, resulting in 3,404 households committing to the program and high reported usage of the sustainable action items provided.
A proposal submitted in April 2009 to the Alberta Real Estate Foundation (AREF) was approved in June 2009, with some modifications. We originally had proposed to research native plants species on green sections of three commercial roofs in the city of Edmonton, and to establish and monitor these roofs. We were now to use the fund ($45,600) for one roof only, the Williams Engineering building roof.
The document provides acknowledgements for contributions to a project by Dr. Tang Lee, a professor of architecture, building science and environmental health at the University of Calgary, and Stephen Farrell, owner of VerdaTech Inc, an energy management and consulting company. It then lists indexes for sections on home energy efficiency, indoor air quality, home water efficiency, home waste management, and location and amenities. The guide aims to help consumers make informed decisions when choosing a new home by evaluating its energy efficiency, indoor air quality, water conservation and waste management features.
FREE A4 Cyber Security Awareness Posters-Social Engineering part 3Data Hops
Free A4 downloadable and printable Cyber Security, Social Engineering Safety and security Training Posters . Promote security awareness in the home or workplace. Lock them Out From training providers datahops.com
This presentation provides valuable insights into effective cost-saving techniques on AWS. Learn how to optimize your AWS resources by rightsizing, increasing elasticity, picking the right storage class, and choosing the best pricing model. Additionally, discover essential governance mechanisms to ensure continuous cost efficiency. Whether you are new to AWS or an experienced user, this presentation provides clear and practical tips to help you reduce your cloud costs and get the most out of your budget.
A Comprehensive Guide to DeFi Development Services in 2024Intelisync
DeFi represents a paradigm shift in the financial industry. Instead of relying on traditional, centralized institutions like banks, DeFi leverages blockchain technology to create a decentralized network of financial services. This means that financial transactions can occur directly between parties, without intermediaries, using smart contracts on platforms like Ethereum.
In 2024, we are witnessing an explosion of new DeFi projects and protocols, each pushing the boundaries of what’s possible in finance.
In summary, DeFi in 2024 is not just a trend; it’s a revolution that democratizes finance, enhances security and transparency, and fosters continuous innovation. As we proceed through this presentation, we'll explore the various components and services of DeFi in detail, shedding light on how they are transforming the financial landscape.
At Intelisync, we specialize in providing comprehensive DeFi development services tailored to meet the unique needs of our clients. From smart contract development to dApp creation and security audits, we ensure that your DeFi project is built with innovation, security, and scalability in mind. Trust Intelisync to guide you through the intricate landscape of decentralized finance and unlock the full potential of blockchain technology.
Ready to take your DeFi project to the next level? Partner with Intelisync for expert DeFi development services today!
Trusted Execution Environment for Decentralized Process MiningLucaBarbaro3
Presentation of the paper "Trusted Execution Environment for Decentralized Process Mining" given during the CAiSE 2024 Conference in Cyprus on June 7, 2024.
Skybuffer SAM4U tool for SAP license adoptionTatiana Kojar
Manage and optimize your license adoption and consumption with SAM4U, an SAP free customer software asset management tool.
SAM4U, an SAP complimentary software asset management tool for customers, delivers a detailed and well-structured overview of license inventory and usage with a user-friendly interface. We offer a hosted, cost-effective, and performance-optimized SAM4U setup in the Skybuffer Cloud environment. You retain ownership of the system and data, while we manage the ABAP 7.58 infrastructure, ensuring fixed Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) and exceptional services through the SAP Fiori interface.
Building Production Ready Search Pipelines with Spark and MilvusZilliz
Spark is the widely used ETL tool for processing, indexing and ingesting data to serving stack for search. Milvus is the production-ready open-source vector database. In this talk we will show how to use Spark to process unstructured data to extract vector representations, and push the vectors to Milvus vector database for search serving.
Digital Banking in the Cloud: How Citizens Bank Unlocked Their MainframePrecisely
Inconsistent user experience and siloed data, high costs, and changing customer expectations – Citizens Bank was experiencing these challenges while it was attempting to deliver a superior digital banking experience for its clients. Its core banking applications run on the mainframe and Citizens was using legacy utilities to get the critical mainframe data to feed customer-facing channels, like call centers, web, and mobile. Ultimately, this led to higher operating costs (MIPS), delayed response times, and longer time to market.
Ever-changing customer expectations demand more modern digital experiences, and the bank needed to find a solution that could provide real-time data to its customer channels with low latency and operating costs. Join this session to learn how Citizens is leveraging Precisely to replicate mainframe data to its customer channels and deliver on their “modern digital bank” experiences.
For the full video of this presentation, please visit: https://www.edge-ai-vision.com/2024/06/temporal-event-neural-networks-a-more-efficient-alternative-to-the-transformer-a-presentation-from-brainchip/
Chris Jones, Director of Product Management at BrainChip , presents the “Temporal Event Neural Networks: A More Efficient Alternative to the Transformer” tutorial at the May 2024 Embedded Vision Summit.
The expansion of AI services necessitates enhanced computational capabilities on edge devices. Temporal Event Neural Networks (TENNs), developed by BrainChip, represent a novel and highly efficient state-space network. TENNs demonstrate exceptional proficiency in handling multi-dimensional streaming data, facilitating advancements in object detection, action recognition, speech enhancement and language model/sequence generation. Through the utilization of polynomial-based continuous convolutions, TENNs streamline models, expedite training processes and significantly diminish memory requirements, achieving notable reductions of up to 50x in parameters and 5,000x in energy consumption compared to prevailing methodologies like transformers.
Integration with BrainChip’s Akida neuromorphic hardware IP further enhances TENNs’ capabilities, enabling the realization of highly capable, portable and passively cooled edge devices. This presentation delves into the technical innovations underlying TENNs, presents real-world benchmarks, and elucidates how this cutting-edge approach is positioned to revolutionize edge AI across diverse applications.
Driving Business Innovation: Latest Generative AI Advancements & Success StorySafe Software
Are you ready to revolutionize how you handle data? Join us for a webinar where we’ll bring you up to speed with the latest advancements in Generative AI technology and discover how leveraging FME with tools from giants like Google Gemini, Amazon, and Microsoft OpenAI can supercharge your workflow efficiency.
During the hour, we’ll take you through:
Guest Speaker Segment with Hannah Barrington: Dive into the world of dynamic real estate marketing with Hannah, the Marketing Manager at Workspace Group. Hear firsthand how their team generates engaging descriptions for thousands of office units by integrating diverse data sources—from PDF floorplans to web pages—using FME transformers, like OpenAIVisionConnector and AnthropicVisionConnector. This use case will show you how GenAI can streamline content creation for marketing across the board.
Ollama Use Case: Learn how Scenario Specialist Dmitri Bagh has utilized Ollama within FME to input data, create custom models, and enhance security protocols. This segment will include demos to illustrate the full capabilities of FME in AI-driven processes.
Custom AI Models: Discover how to leverage FME to build personalized AI models using your data. Whether it’s populating a model with local data for added security or integrating public AI tools, find out how FME facilitates a versatile and secure approach to AI.
We’ll wrap up with a live Q&A session where you can engage with our experts on your specific use cases, and learn more about optimizing your data workflows with AI.
This webinar is ideal for professionals seeking to harness the power of AI within their data management systems while ensuring high levels of customization and security. Whether you're a novice or an expert, gain actionable insights and strategies to elevate your data processes. Join us to see how FME and AI can revolutionize how you work with data!
How to Interpret Trends in the Kalyan Rajdhani Mix Chart.pdfChart Kalyan
A Mix Chart displays historical data of numbers in a graphical or tabular form. The Kalyan Rajdhani Mix Chart specifically shows the results of a sequence of numbers over different periods.
Ivanti’s Patch Tuesday breakdown goes beyond patching your applications and brings you the intelligence and guidance needed to prioritize where to focus your attention first. Catch early analysis on our Ivanti blog, then join industry expert Chris Goettl for the Patch Tuesday Webinar Event. There we’ll do a deep dive into each of the bulletins and give guidance on the risks associated with the newly-identified vulnerabilities.
In the realm of cybersecurity, offensive security practices act as a critical shield. By simulating real-world attacks in a controlled environment, these techniques expose vulnerabilities before malicious actors can exploit them. This proactive approach allows manufacturers to identify and fix weaknesses, significantly enhancing system security.
This presentation delves into the development of a system designed to mimic Galileo's Open Service signal using software-defined radio (SDR) technology. We'll begin with a foundational overview of both Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS) and the intricacies of digital signal processing.
The presentation culminates in a live demonstration. We'll showcase the manipulation of Galileo's Open Service pilot signal, simulating an attack on various software and hardware systems. This practical demonstration serves to highlight the potential consequences of unaddressed vulnerabilities, emphasizing the importance of offensive security practices in safeguarding critical infrastructure.
Alberta land trust 2009 03 4 of 6-best stewardship practises
1. MODULE #4
Best Stewardship Practices
Training Module
April 2010
This project is made possible through a grant from the Alberta Real Estate Foundation
Prepared by: Sue Michalsky, Paskwa Consultants Ltd., Tel: 306-295-3696
Email:suemichalsky@sasktel.net
2. Best Stewardship Practices Training Module
Learning Outcomes:
• Know the best practices associated with land trust stewardship that are
recommended by the Alberta Land Trust Alliance, including
baseline documentation reporting,
monitoring, defence and enforcement,
landowner and public relations and
funding.
3. GLOSSARY
Baseline Documentation Report - The legal record of the site and condition of the resource;
included in the easement or deed package.
Conservation Easement - A legal agreement between a landowner and a qualified
conservation organization or government agency that limits a property's uses in order to
protect the property's conservation values. It is a voluntary, written agreement that is
registered on title to the land in Alberta in accordance with the Alberta Land Titles Act. It
binds current and future owners of the land.
Encroachment - Extension of a structure, portion of a structure, or destructive activity onto
someone else's property without permission.
Endowment - A fund which is kept in perpetuity to provide interest and dividend earnings
for the benefit of a charitable cause.
Liability - The responsibility of a land trust to ensure that negligence or inappropriate
actions do not result in bodily injury or property damage.
Monitoring - The act of observing and keeping a record of the activities and conservation
values associated with a conservation property.
Stewardship endowment - A dedicated, permanent source of funds for a land trust to cover
the costs of conservation easement monitoring and land management in perpetuity.
Violations - Breaking, breaching or contravening the restrictions and management
stipulations outlined in a conservation easement agreement to the detriment of the
conservation values of a property.
4. BACKGROUND
Stewardship is an important responsibility of land trust organizations. Land trust are
responsible for ensuring that conservation values are protected in perpetuity. If
implemented correctly, long-term stewardship creates credibility with landowners, donors,
governments, supporters, neighbours and staff. Because of this responsibility, land trust
alliances such as the Canadian Land Trust Alliance place a heavy emphasis on
recommended best practices associated with stewardship activities and administration.
The Canadian Land Trust Alliance (CLTA) includes perpetual responsibility as one of its
four guiding principles:
Principle B: Perpetual Responsibility. Land trusts should recognize that they have an
obligation to protect the lands and properties that they care for in perpetuity. As such,
land trusts have a responsibility to act in the long-term best interest of both the
properties, themselves and their organization.
5. BEST PRACTICES FOR BASELINE DOCUMENTATION REPORTING
The CLTA provides guidance on stewardship administration in standard 12, practice E:
Land Stewardship Administration. The land trust performs administrative
duties in a timely and responsible manner. This includes establishing policies and
procedures, keeping essential records, filing forms, paying insurance, paying any
taxes and/or securing appropriate tax exemptions, budgeting, and maintaining
files. Staff and volunteers responsible for administrative duties and responsibilities
will be adequately trained.
This responsibility begins with the baseline documentation report and applies
through all stages of stewardship.
BEST PRACTICES ASSOCIATED WITH BDRS FOR CONSERVATION EASEMENTS
The CLTA provides guidance on best practices associated with BDRs for conservation
easement agreements in standard 11, practice B:
Baseline Documentation Report. For every conservation agreement, the land
trust has a baseline documentation report (that includes a baseline map and
photographs) prepared prior to closing and signed by the landowner at closing.
Both the landowner and the land trust should hold at least one original copy. The
report documents the important conservation values protected by the
conservation agreement and the relevant conditions of the property as necessary
to monitor and enforce the conservation agreement. In the event that seasonal
conditions prevent the completion of a full baseline documentation report by
closing, the baseline documentation report may include an interim baseline
documentation report and an acknowledgement it will be replaced by a full
report. This interim report and acknowledgement will be signed by the landowner
at closing.
In addition to the guidelines recommended by CLTA, the Alberta Land Trust Alliance also
recommends:
• Either the full baseline documentation report or an interim version will be attached
to the CE, and the conservation easement agreement should refer to it and describe
6. its purpose. A typical provision in a conservation easement agreement might state:
The Parties agree that the Land and the Amenities are described in the Report.
• It is good practice for the landowner and land trust to work together in gathering
baseline information, even though it is the land trust’s responsibility to prepare the
baseline documentation report. The landowner may have valuable information to
contribute and participating in gathering the baseline information will educate the
landowner about the land and may increase their commitment to its conservation.
• The baseline report should be written in a manner that facilitates third party
interpretation in order to account for acceptable natural dynamics of the property,
as well as to support the defence of the CE in situations of non-compliance.
• The land trust should provide each new landowner with a copy of the full baseline
documentation report, particularly if the full report is not attached to the
conservation easement agreement. This will ensure that all parties have complete
information and also provides an opportunity for the land trust to contact the
landowner. New landowners should be asked to sign a document indicating that
they have read and agree with the contents of the baseline documentation report as
an indication that they received a copy and an explanation of the terms.
• Baseline information may become outdated in situations where land changes
significantly over time. For example, a natural catastrophe or certain types of human
intervention may alter the land to the degree that the original baseline report is no
longer useful. It may be necessary either to update the baseline documentation
report or prepare a new report. Ideally, this should be accomplished by way of an
amendment to the conservation easement agreement to ensure that updated
baseline information is fully incorporated.
• Baseline documentation should be stored in a location where it is safe from harm
and easily located. It should be stored in both electronic and hard copy form. See
Appendix A for more detail on proper storage of baseline information.
7. BEST PRACTICES ASSOCIATED WITH BDRS FOR FEE SIMPLE PROPERTIES
The CLTA provides guidance on best practices associated with BDRs and management
plans for fee simple properties in standard 12, practices B and C:
B. Stewardship Principles. The land trust establishes general principles to guide
the stewardship of its fee-owned properties, including determining what uses are
and are not appropriate on its properties, the types of improvements it might
make and any land management practices it will follow. Principles should be
clearly stated in all management plans and all public relations material.
C. Land Management. The land trust inventories the natural and cultural
features of each property prior to developing a management plan that identifies
its conservation goals for the property and how it plans to achieve them.
Permitted activities are compatible with the conservation goals, stewardship
principles and public benefit mission of the organization. Permitted activities
occur only when the activity poses no significant threat to the important
conservation values and reduces threats or restores ecological processes.
In addition to the guidelines recommended by CLTA, the Alberta Land Trust Alliance also
recommends:
• An environmental site assessment or site inspection should be the first piece of
baseline information collected on a property a land trust is considering owning.
Such an inspection can detect environmental liabilities associated with the property
which may provide a high risk to the land trust. Appendix B contains an example of a
site inspection form.
• Baseline information may become outdated in situations where land changes
significantly over time. For example, a natural catastrophe or certain types of human
intervention may alter the land to the degree that the original baseline report is no
longer useful. It may be necessary either to update the baseline documentation
report or prepare a new report and management plan.
• Baseline documentation should be stored in a location where it is safe from harm
and easily located. It should be stored in both electronic and hard copy form. See
Appendix A for more detail on proper storage of baseline information.
8. BEST PRACTICES FOR MONITORING LAND TRUST PROPERTIES
The Alberta Land Trust Alliance recommends the following best practices for stewardship
monitoring of both CE and fee simple properties:
• Land trust goals for the monitoring program should be formally identified in written
form and approved by the land trust board.
• Organizational capacity should be assessed periodically in terms of funding, labour
and time, and a monitoring program developed or updated that both fulfills
stewardship obligations and organizational sustainability. For some organizations,
this assessment may mean refocusing, for a time, on stewardship rather than new
land protection initiatives.
• Monitoring procedures should be written down and/or to a monitoring policy
developed and periodically reviewed and updated. It will be a valuable resource for
new board members and land trust personnel.
• Land trusts should establish a training program for monitors tailored to the
monitoring requirements for the specific property. Depending on the conservation
values protected and the nature of the monitoring required, it may be necessary to
recruit monitors with technical expertise. Otherwise, lay volunteers generally will
carry out monitoring duties. Training programs should teach techniques that will
be required in the particular circumstances. These could include videotaping,
photography, and the use of other specialized techniques. All monitors should be
proficient in accurate and detailed note-taking.
• Personal safety is of primary importance for monitors. All potential hazards
associated with land trust properties should be documented and brought to the
attention of new monitors. Safety protocols should be designed and monitors
should be trained annually to ensure a high safety standard. Safety protocols should
include notification of when and where monitors will be, emergency response
preparation, dealing with specific hazards including wildlife and difficult
landowners, and first aid.
• Monitoring should be rigorous, credible and repeated at regular intervals.
Information should be gathered as accurately, precisely and often as possible.
Consistent use of the same methods, timing and techniques for gathering similar
types of information is essential so that any differences in results can be clearly
attributed to change on the land rather than variation in technique. Where possible,
having the same individuals involved in monitoring a particular property over
several monitoring cycles can contribute to consistency in gathering monitoring
data.
9. • Monitoring data and reports should be stored in a location where they are safe from
harm and easily located. They should be stored in both electronic and hard copy
form. See Appendix A for more detail on proper storage of monitoring information.
• Changes to a stewardship program should be phased in by implementing a timeline
that allows the land trust to build capacity and fully understand how the changes
will affect the stewardship program and the organization as a whole.
BEST PRACTICES ASSOCIATED WITH MONITORING OF CONSERVATION
EASEMENT PROPERTIES
The Canadian Land Trust Alliance provides guidance on best practices associated with
monitoring conservation easement agreements in standard 11, practices C and E:
C. Conservation Agreement Monitoring. The land trust monitors its
conservation agreement properties regularly, at least annually, except in
exceptional and remote circumstances, in a manner appropriate to the size,
restrictions and threats to the conservation values of each property. The land trust
keeps written documentation (such as reports, updated photographs and maps) of
each monitoring activity to confirm that the present use of the property is
consistent with that at the time of donation or acquisition. Monitoring of
Ecological Gifts will include confirmation that the present use of the property is
consistent with that at the time of the donation and monitoring request. The land
trust will determine the capabilities (both human and financial) of its
organization to fulfill the short and long-term monitoring responsibilities and will
not accept conservation agreements it cannot monitor effectively. If conservation
agreements are monitored by volunteers, the land trust shall ensure that, they are
trained, tailoring the monitoring techniques and requirements to the specific
property.
E. Enforcement of Conservation Agreements. The land trust has a written
policy and/or procedure detailing how it will respond to potential violations of a
conservation agreement, including the role of all parties involved (such as board
members, volunteers, staff and partners) in any enforcement action. Policies and
procedures should ensure that all discussions and actions taken are recorded and
that all copies of correspondence and documents are retained and kept in a safe
location. The land trust takes necessary and consistent steps to see that violations
are resolved and has available, or has a strategy to secure, the financial and legal
resources for enforcement and defence.
In addition to the guidelines recommended by CLTA, the Alberta Land Trust Alliance also
recommends:
10. • The land trust should create or adapt a standard CE monitoring form.
• The monitoring program should be designed, and monitoring report written, in a
manner that facilitates third party interpretation to account for acceptable natural
dynamics of the property, as well as to support the defence of the CE in situations of
non-compliance.
• Land trusts should monitor only for compliance with the terms of the CE. It is
important for the land trust to maintain the distinction between issues related to the
CE and land management that is not part of the land trust’s responsibility. This
distinction simplifies monitoring requirements and helps maintain positive
relations with the landowner.
• Where possible, permanent staff should be engaged in monitoring as it provides
necessary continuity, consistent conservation easement agreement interpretation,
proactive relations with landowners, and long-term organizational accountability.
• In the event of a breach, the monitor should thoroughly document the breach and
report to the stewardship team. The land trust should contact the landowner
immediately and negotiate a timeline for compliance. Unintentional violations may
be resolved through voluntary reparation by the landowner or by amending the CE
to allow the activity. However, amendments to CEs should be very carefully
considered. If agreement cannot be reached, or the landowner does not attempt to
meet the deadline, a binding arbitration process should be started.
• In general, parties to a CE are all committed to the protection of the land involved
and a well designed and executed program of landowner contact usually prevents
the need for enforcement. However, in some circumstances, it may be necessary for
the land trust to enforce the terms of the CE. The land trust should enforce
compliance in a timely fashion through the binding arbitration process (e.g.,
mediation or litigation) outlined in the CE agreement when violations occur or it
may lose the right to a remedy from the courts in the future.
• Land trusts should have a written CE violation policy and procedures which outlines
the roles of all parties involved including legal counsel; the sequence of determining,
reporting and handling the violation; and steps to ensure that landowners are
treated fairly and consistently through the process.
11. BEST PRACTICES ASSOCIATED WITH MONITORING OF FEE SIMPLE PROPERTIES
The CLTA provides guidance on best practices associated with monitoring fee simple
properties in standard 12, practice D:
Monitoring Land Trust Properties. The land trust regularly monitors its
properties and property boundaries for potential management problems such as
trespass, misuse or overuse, vandalism or safety hazards or other activities as
listed in the management plan and takes actions to rectify such problems. The land
trust should mark the property boundaries or have capacity to establish the
boundaries in the event of encroachments. Land trusts should record monitoring
information and quickly respond to any problems. Monitoring of Ecological Gifts
will include confirmation that the present use of the property is consistent with
that at the time of the donation and monitoring documentation relating to
Ecological Gifts will be made available to Environment Canada upon request.
In addition to the guidelines recommended by CLTA, the Alberta Land Trust Alliance also
recommends:
• Encroachment and illegal activities on fee simple properties can usually be
prevented if the land trust marks and maintains its boundaries and monitors
regularly. Signage should include ownership at minimum, but might also include
purposes and permitted and prohibited uses. Hazards on the property should also
be marked.
• In addition to signage and monitoring, a land trust with property that allows public
access should hold liability insurance.
12. BEST PRACTICES FOR LANDOWNER RELATIONS
Building strong relationships with landowners is essential to the success of a land trust.
The land trust’s reputation in the landowner community will determine the success it will
have in securing land. Land trusts and landowners are partners in effective management of
CE properties and good relations with CE landowners help ensure violations do not occur.
Many land trusts feel that landowner relations are the best defence against CE violations.
The best practices in this section apply primarily to conservation easement properties.
However, the practices recommended should also be used to guide landowner contact
when securing fee simple properties or communicating with neighbours of fee simple
properties.
The CLTA provides guidance on best practices associated with landowner relations for
conservation easement agreements in standard 11, practice D:
Landowner Relationships. The land trust maintains regular contact with owners
of properties with conservation agreements. When possible, it offers landowners
information on property management and/or referrals to resource managers. The
land trust enlists a contact staff or volunteer assigned to respond to landowner
requests or inquiries. These staff or volunteers will be trained on how to work with
landowners. The land trust strives to build promptly a positive working
relationship with new owners of properties with conservation agreements and
informs them about the conservation agreements existence and restrictions and
the land trust’s stewardship policies and procedures. The land trust establishes
and implements systems to track changes in land ownership. Land trusts should
offer the new landowners a copy of the conservation agreement and baseline
documentation as well as any information about its work in general.
The CLTA provides guidance on best practices associated with community relations
associated with fee simple properties in standard 12, practice F:
Community Outreach. The land trust keeps neighbours and community leaders
informed about its ownership and management of conservation properties.
In addition to the guidelines recommended by CLTA, the Alberta Land Trust Alliance also
recommends:
13. • Prior to monitoring a CE property, the land trust should contact the landowner to
provide notice of its monitoring plans, including the date and methods of
monitoring. Some land trusts in Alberta provide notice in writing early in the year
and then confirm the date by phone at least 24 hours in advance of the actual
monitoring visit. Even if the terms of the CE do not require prior agreement on
monitoring dates or notice, it is respectful to do so and relations between
landowners and land trusts will be strengthened by such contact.
• As the representative of the land trust, the monitor should contact the landowner to
inform the landowner of the pending monitoring visit, to introduce themselves, to
advise the landowner about planned monitoring techniques, and to ask if the
landowner has any concerns. Where there has been no previous contact between
the monitor and the landowner, it may be preferable for long term staff to make the
initial contact to introduce the monitor.
• Land trusts should invite the landowner to accompany them on the monitoring visit
or ask if the landowner would like to meet with the monitor after the monitoring
visit. The monitoring visit provides an opportunity for a land trust to discuss its
goals and stewardship philosophy and to seek information and opinions from
landowners.
• Land trust staff should brief monitors about appropriate questions to ask
landowners as well as questions to expect from landowners. Careful preparation
and prior contact with the landowner will help prevent any conflict or unpleasant
surprises.
• If a CE is monitored remotely in some years, the landowner should still be contacted
in writing to inform them of the method and timing of monitoring and by phone to
ask if they have any concerns or if there is anything that the land trust needs to be
aware of.
• Monitors should access the property only as permitted legally or by permission of
the landowner. Use only public points of access or ask permission to use private
access. Monitor on foot or ask permission from the landowner to use alternate
methods of transportation. Use respect - stick to established roads and trails as may
be described in the CE when using motorized vehicles.
• The responsibility for taking action when a landowner is not in compliance with a
CE lies with the land trust, not with the individual monitor. If violations are
suspected during the monitoring visits, monitors should avoid discussion of the
violation with the landowner. The violation should be thoroughly documented and
presented to the stewardship team who will determine how to communicate with
the landowner about this issue.
• Land trusts should ask the landowner to sign off on monitoring reports. Sign off by
the landowner indicates that they acknowledge the monitoring visit and have
reviewed and agree with the results. Some land trusts send two copies of the
monitoring report and ask for one to be signed and returned. If the report is not
14. returned, the land trust follows up with a phone call or visit. Signed copies of the
monitoring report should be stored in the monitoring file.
• There may be coholders or funders who require or would benefit from knowing the
results of the monitoring visit. Depending on their interest in a property, land trusts
should keep them up to date by providing information on dates and methods of
monitoring, copies of monitoring reports and/or copies of correspondence between
the landowner and the land trust.
• The land trust should put in place a general program for maintaining contact with
landowners and other partners in addition to monitoring visits. This could include
providing landowners with regular updates of the land trust’s conservation
activities as well as regularly scheduled specific contact with the landowner.
Outreach programming may also include newsletters, field tours, publications,
websites etc.
• Land trusts should develop policies regarding contact with landowners and keep
monitors informed of these policies. For example, the organization’s policy might
involve a volunteer monitor contacting the landowner to arrange a visit and an
interview time, if necessary, once a staff representative has made initial contact.
When arranging monitoring visits, it is a good idea to check with the landowner
about any specific circumstances to be careful of, such as the presence of livestock
or wildlife.
• Land trusts need to establish a method of determining when CE properties change
hands. In Alberta the land titles office normally provides written notice to interest
holders of a transfer of ownership. Land trusts should also request that landowners
notify the land trust of any transfer in ownership. The land trust should have a
policy in place to ensure they are aware of any land transfers and have a process to
communicate in a timely manner with new owners.
• New owners should immediately be sent copies of the conservation easement
agreement and the baseline documentation report. The land trust should follow up
this initial contact with a face to face meeting where they can introduce their
mission and goals for the property, review the easement terms, and discuss the
monitoring process.
15. BEST PRACTICES FOR DEDICATED STEWARDSHIP FUNDING
The CLTA provides guidance on best practices associated with dedicated stewardship
funding in standard 6, practice G; standard 11, practice A; and standard 12, practice B:
6 G: Funds for Stewardship and Enforcement. The land trust has a secure and
lasting source of dedicated or operating funds sufficient to cover the costs of
stewarding its land and conservation agreements over the long term and
enforcing its conservation agreements, tracks stewardship and enforcement costs,
and periodically evaluates the adequacy of its funds. In the event that full funding
for these costs is not secure, the board has adopted a policy committing the
organization to raising the necessary funds.
11 A: Funding Conservation Agreement Stewardship. The land trust determines
the long-term stewardship and enforcement expenses of each conservation
agreement transaction and secures the dedicated or operating funds to cover
current and future expenses. If funds are not secured at or before the completion of
the transaction, the land trust has a plan to secure these funds and has a policy
committing the funds to this purpose.
12 A: Funding Land Stewardship. The land trust determines and documents the
immediate and long-term financial and management implications of each land
transaction and secures the dedicated and/or operating funds needed to manage
the property, including funds for liability insurance, maintenance, improvements,
monitoring, enforcement and other costs. The land trust sets priorities, ensuring
first and foremost that the values for which the property was acquired are at least
maintained or preferably strengthened. If funds are not secured at or before the
completion of the transaction, the land trust has a plan to secure these funds and
has a policy committing the funds to this purpose.
In addition to the guidelines recommended by CLTA, the Alberta Land Trust Alliance also
recommends:
• The land trust should have a written land stewardship fund policy that can be
shared with funders and partners (see Training Module 3: Dedicated Stewardship
Funding for information on stewardship fund policy).
16. ADDITIONAL RESOURCES
Background to Canadian Land Trust Standards and Practices. 2007. The Canadian Land
Trust Alliance.
Canadian Land Trust Standards and Practices. 2007. The Canadian Land Trust Alliance
Conservation Easement Stewardship. 2008. Standards and Practices Curriculum. The
Land Trust Alliance
Greening Your Title: A guide to best practices for conservation covenants, 2nd Edition.
2005. Ann Hillyer and Judy Atkins. West Coast Environmental Law.
17. APPENDIX A: DATA STORAGE AND ARCHIVING
The following guidelines have been extracted from the LTABC Baseline Inventory Guide.
2006. Although the guidelines were prepared for baseline documentation, they are equally
applicable to monitoring information.
18. - DATA STORAGE AND ARCHIVING -
Data storage and archiving methods are critical components of the baseline inventory process. As
baseline inventory reports may be necessary for future legal action, it is essential that appropriate
methods be taken to ensure that data do not degrade over time, and that all information can be
properly identified.
Data storage refers to the physical methods taken to ensure that the data remains viable in the long
run, while archiving involves the proper labelling and identification of your data to ensure that you
know what it is in the future. The following section of this guide discusses this issue in detail.
ARCHIVING
In order to ensure that data can be positively identified in the future, it is advisable that simple
archiving methods be undertaken. For all reports, maps, and field notes make sure that the name
and date of the inventory of the property is clearly indicated. For photographs it is a different
matter.
Each photograph that is taken during an inventory needs to be labelled. Labels should indicate the
date, location, subject and photographer. A simple method to do this is to create a unique code for
each photograph. For example, photographs were taken on the ABC Nature Reserve on August 20th,
2005. Before field work was started, the following code and information was decided upon:
Therefore, all photos taken on the ABC Nature Reserve would use this code as a unique identifier.
The first photo would be labelled ABC-200805-R1-01, the second labelled ABC-200805-R1-02 and
so on. Photos taken on the same date but on a different roll would use R2, R3 and so on. Future
monitoring photos can then use the same format with dates changing as necessary to ensure
consistency through time.
LTABC Data Storage & Archiving Guidelines
19. In the body of the baseline report you can create a table which states the unique code for a given
photo, and provides descriptions of the subject, location, etc. This method only requires a short
code to be written on each photo, thereby reducing the chance of damage to the photo and ensuring
that the photo can be accurately identified and described in the future.
A data form can be used in the field to record the location and subject of each photograph to ensure
that they can be described later in the report. As well, it is recommended that a Photo ID Sheet is
used. The Photo ID Sheet contains all of the information described above (property name, code,
date, and roll number). At the beginning of each roll the first photo should be of the Photo ID Sheet.
This way, the necessary information is permanently embedded on the negative and multiple rolls
are not confused when processed.
For digital photographs the same technique can be used. Roll numbers are obviously not required,
but it may be necessary to replace the roll number with a flash card number depending on available
memory. Instead of writing the code on each photo, it can be digitally placed on the front of the
photo. The file name of the photo should also be the unique code so specific photos can easily be
located.
DATA STORAGE
Introduction
Data storage is one of the most important aspects of your baseline inventory. If your records do not
survive time then, obviously, they are useless. The general rule for all data storage is duplication,
duplication and duplication. The issue of digital storage is relatively new and constantly changing.
The information on digital storage in this section is current for 2006, but it will likely become
obsolete within the decade. Therefore, digital storage methods need to be constantly evaluated and
updated as required by technological changes since methods used today may not even be
recognizable in the near future.
Paper & Ink
As baseline inventory reports will be used for a long time, it is important to use archive quality ink.
Most bubble jet and inkjet printers use very cheap ink that generally does not last long. Laser
printers, on the other hand, use powdered ink similar to photocopiers that will last much longer.
Colour printing is also a problem. Most colour ink fade very quickly, especially red. Colour laser
printing generally lasts longer then bubble jets or ink jets. Paper should be acid free and at least 22
lbs. weight. Special, coated paper is available for colour prints. Avoid storing any paper product in
the sun as it will greatly increase the fading of ink and degradation of paper.
Negative and Slide Storage
Of all photographic sensitized products, processed negatives are usually given the least attention
when it comes to storage (Kodak, 2003). As with photos and slides, negatives must be properly
stored and handled to preserve their quality. Special care must be taken with storage, as even when
stored in the dark, colour negatives slowly change and lose quality.
Negatives and slides must be kept free of dust, fingerprints and any other contamination as these
things often contain chemicals and endospores that can damage the image. Negatives should be
LTABC Data Storage & Archiving Guidelines
20. stored in a dark place as light can affect the photographic dye. Storage boxes made of metal is
preferred as metal is does not contain preservatives like wood, or produce volatile chemicals as
does plastic. If stored in envelopes or plastic sleeves make sure they are of archive quality and do
not contain any damaging substances.
Temperature and humidity must be controlled as both adversely affect processed negatives and
slides. The following conditions and precautions are recommended by Kodak (2003) when storing
negatives and slides:
• Keep storage containers away from radiators, warm-air registers, and windows where
sunlight can strike them.
• Keep the temperature low for long-term storage. High temperature and high relative
humidity can affect processed negatives. A temperature of 0°F (-18°C) and a relative
humidity between 30 and 35 percent are excellent conditions for long-term storage.
• Even minor reductions from room temperature have a major beneficial impact on the
stability of an image.
• Do not store negatives in areas where ozone-generating machines such as photocopiers are
used.
• Air conditioning and climate control can significantly reduce the level of airborne
pollutants, but be sure to change filters regularly. Chemical fumes can harm negatives and
slides. Check your storage area for harmful fumes.
Photo Storage
Photographs are susceptible to the same environmental factors as slides and negatives; primarily
extreme temperatures, humidity, and chemical and biological degradation. Photographs should be
stored in archive quality albums or transparent sheets in binders. Binders or albums should be kept
out of direct sunlight preferably on open air shelves. Kodak (2003) recommends the following:
• Provide a cool, dry, uncontaminated storage place.
• Avoid storing prints in the original cardboard box or package. Packaging material that is
suitable for unexposed sensitized materials may not be inert to processed materials. Use
archival safe boxes or envelopes.
• The best storage conditions for color prints are the same as those for most other
photographic products. Store prints in the dark at 75°F (24°C) or lower and at 30- to 50-
percent relative humidity.
CD Use and Storage
Compact Disks (CD) are considered to be a long lasting, inexpensive way of storing digital data. All
monitoring data should be printed and recorded on duplicate CDs for long-term storage. However,
there are a number of things that can greatly affect the longevity of the CDs and, therefore, the
longevity of the data on the CDs. Longevity is usually limited by the cumulative effects of small
scratches and contaminants that are introduced through normal handling and use (Media Sciences,
2003). Therefore, care must be taken to ensure that CDs are used and stored in an appropriate
manner and always in duplicate.
When purchasing recordable CDs it is better to choose more expensive brands that come with their
own jewel case. These days there are hundreds of brands to choose from, each with their own claim
LTABC Data Storage & Archiving Guidelines
21. as the best on the market. Ignore the claims as there is no proven ‘best’ brand, but price is linked
with quality. According to Media Science Inc. (2003) there was “no correlation observed between
CD-R quality and dye type (cyanine or phthalocyanine), metallization (gold or silver), or recording
speed (2X-8X)”. For archiving purposes, Media Science Inc. (2003) recommends the following:
“Generally accepted capacities are 650 MB for 74 minute discs and 550 MB for 63 minute discs.
High quality recording should utilize only 550 MB or less of a 74 minute disc, because performance
may rapidly degrade at large diameters.
Use 63 minute CD-R discs for all but the highest capacity applications. Benefit from higher quality
and the improved probability of successful interchange. Careful investigation shows that data
written on 63 minute CD-R discs may be of significantly higher quality than data on 74 minute
discs.”
Once data has been recorded onto the CDs, care must be taken to handle and store them in a proper
manner. When labeling the CDs Media Science Inc. (2003) recommends the following:
“Although damage to the readout surface can cause a disc to fail, the label side is even more
delicate. CD discs have a soft, very thin protective coating on the label surface that is vulnerable to
chemical or physical attack. Physical damage to this surface will destroy the underlying recorded
data, or will admit atmospheric contaminants that corrode the metallic coating. Silver is particularly
vulnerable to attack by sulphur, a common air pollutant. Even aluminum layers used for CD-ROM
discs oxidize when exposed to clean air, resulting in loss of performance. Application of a label or
other marks can also cause degradation. Special non-reactive adhesives or inks must be used to
avoid attack of the metallization layer by migration of chemicals through the protective coating.
The safest method of identification is to rely on the manufacturer's lot code that is present on the
clear inner ring of the disc. Small, custom markings in this area can be safely made with felt-tipped
marking pens that use waterbased inks. Such pens may be available from CD-R manufacturers or
can be purchased at office supply shops.
Popular felt-tipped pens, such as the Sharpie, use solvent-based inks. The solvent can attack
certain CD protective coatings, causing degradation that may not be immediately apparent.
Even water-based inks may not be safe, since the permanent ink from any marking pen can
subsequently degrade the information layer. Do not write using a ballpoint pen or other
object having a hard point.”
CDs should always be stored in clean, non-flexible, plastic jewel cases. Media Science Inc. (2003)
recommends that “both unrecorded and recorded disks should be [stored] in a stable storage
environment of 10 C-15 C and 20%-50% relative humidity, and protected from sunlight and other
radiation sources”. CDs should never be exposed to extreme temperatures or bright light.
Long Term Facilities and Packaging
Care must be taken to use appropriate packaging and facilities for any data that are stored for the
long term. For packaging materials, Kodak (2003) recommends the following:
• Use proper packaging materials. Do not store processed material in the original packaging.
Over time, some adhesives, glues, and products from the manufacture of paper and plastics
are harmful to photographic products.
LTABC Data Storage & Archiving Guidelines
22. • All mounting boards, interleaving paper, album covers and pages, and plastic sleeves and
sheets must be free of acids, peroxides, plasticizers, metal particles, wood fibers, sulfites,
nitrates, and chlorides.
• Fumes from mothballs, mildew inhibitors, wood preservatives, paints, varnishes, and wood
glues can contaminate drawers and harm photographic materials. Therefore, open
bookshelves may be a better place to store albums and prints.
Protection against fire is another necessity for obvious reasons. Even with a fireproof vault, as
described below, it is vital to keep the originals and copies in separate locations for added security.
Kodak (2003) recommends the following for long-term storage facilities:
“A ‘fireproof’ storage vault located and constructed in accordance with local building codes and
underwriters’ regulations offers additional protection for large collections. The vault should have
enough insulation to provide satisfactory temperature control all year around, prevent moisture
condensation on the walls, and provide significant resistance to internal temperature increases in
the event of fire. For smaller collections, a fire cabinet or safe will provide protection.
Examine any safe carefully before using it. Many fire-resistant safes and cabinets have a type of
insulation that releases moisture when heated; the interior can become filled with steam during a
fire, which can damage photographic emulsions. Before storing any films or prints in this type of
safe, seal them in moisture proof and photographically inert storage envelopes”.
LTABC Data Storage & Archiving Guidelines
23. APPENDIX B: SAMPLE SITE INSPECTION FORMS
The following documents have been provided by the Alberta Conservation Association and
include:
1. Phase 1 ESA Site Visit Form
2. Phase 1 ESA Environmental Assessment Form
3. Phase 1 ESA Interview Form
24. Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment (ESA)
Site Visit Form
Site Visit Conducted General Method
by: Used:
Site Visit Date and Site Visit
Time: Conditions:
Property Legal
Description:
Qrtr Sect Twp Rnge Mer
Current/Previous
Land Use:
Any evidence of current or past use of hazardous materials on the property?
(i.e. PCB’s, asbestos (insulation), Lead (paint, pipes), ozon-depleting substances, urea foam, formaldehyde, radon etc).
Hazardous Materials Inventory:
(Note: approximate quantities/types of containers and storage conditions)
Any unidentified substances observed on the property?
Any storage tanks observed on the property or adjacent properties or previously removed or abandoned tanks/storage facilities?
Any strong noxious or pungent odours detected?
Do property grounds show any sign of contamination?
(e.g. stressed or dead vegetation, soil staining, water films etc)
Any well sites (active or abandoned) including water, oil or gas?
Any pits, lagoons or dug-outs on the property or adjacent properties?
Any buildings on the property?
Does the exterior of any building on the property show sign of contamination?
25. ALBERTA CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM
Site:
Location:
Prepared By: Date:
Please complete the form as fully as possible using “don’t know “ or “not applicable” as appropriate
for questions you cannot answer. The original of this form, sketch map, and photographs should be
submitted with the land acquisition/donation proposal package to Head Office.
Overall Assessment: (Indicate the source of information you consulted in conducting this
assessment):
Interviews with owner
Interviews with others-identify:
Interviews with fire, health, building, land use or environmental official-identify:
*Aerial photos-current
Aerial photos-historical (give years):
Topographical maps
Zoning/land use maps
Land title search (chain of title history)
Building Plans
Other government records-identify:
Previous environmental assessments-identify:
Other-specify:
Describe your visit and how you inspected the property: (e.g. walked perimeter, entered buildings,
drove all passable roads, flew over interior, etc.)
List the date and time of all visits and identify all persons present during visits:
26. Attach a sketch map of the property covered by this assessment (and adjacent property if necessary).
Show any areas of concern noted in this assessment. Identify those areas that you physically inspected
(e.g. paths walked, roads driven, etc.).
Take pictures of the property (particularly any problem areas) and include them with this form.
Property History/Use: List all known historical and current uses of the property (e.g. agricultural,
manufacturing, undeveloped land, etc.) Identify all known owners/operators. Include dates/time periods
of these uses as appropriate.
List all known historical and current uses of adjacent properties that might have an impact on this
property. Include dates/time periods as appropriate.
List all buildings/structures on the property and their uses.
General Property Condition: (When visiting the property, did you observe the following):
Yes No Don’t
Know
Distressed vegetation or any areas that were bare for no
apparent reason.
Unusual odors.
Stains (unusual or around areas where chemicals are
stored/used)
Evidence of dumping
Trash or other debris
Drains
Any unusual depressions or mounds
Sheens or unusual colors on the surface of water bodies
Piping/vents for underground storage tanks
27. Comment on any yes answers above and locate those areas on the sketch map.
Identify any other areas of concern and identify on sketch map.
Water Impoundments: (Indicate if any of the following are on the property and how they are used
and what they contain. Identify any of the following on the sketch map.)
Ditches:
Pits:
Ponds:
Lagoons:
Clarifiers:
Oil/water separators:
Surface impoundments:
Sumps:
Drums: (If storage drums are on the property, show them on the sketch map and provide the
following information):
Are they empty:
What is/was in the drums:
Any evidence of leaking:
Will the drums need to be moved:
Describe the area around the drums:
Transformers: (If transformers, pole-mounted or pad-mounted are located on the property, show
them on the sketch map and provide the following information):
Type of device and who owns them:
Are they labeled as containing PCB’s or being PCB free:
Any evidence of leaking or damage:
Storage Tanks: (If storage tanks are or were on the property, show them on the sketch map and
provide the following information):
Is/are the tanks above or below ground:
Age and size of tanks:
What was/is stored in the tanks:
Details on any tank that has been removed:
Describe permits for the tank, if available:
Results for any tank and associated piping that has been tested:
Describe the area around the tank and indicate any evidence of leaking or spilling:
28. Septic Tanks or fields: (If septic tanks or fields are on the property, show them on the sketch map and
provide the following information):
Are they in use or abandoned:
Did they receive any industrial materials and what type:
Wells: (If wells are on the property, show them on the sketch map and provide the following
information):
The type of well and how is it used:
Are the wells in use or abandoned:
Are the wells locked or protected:
If the well has been tested attach results.
Have there been any complaints about the quality of the water or flow rate:
Mineral/Petroleum Operations: (If any oil or gas wells, or other mining activities are on the
property, show these locations on the sketch map and provide the following information):
The type of operation:
Where the wastes of the operation was disposed:
Any gas or oil pipelines:
Details of any pipeline leakage:
The owner/operator of any well, pipeline or mine:
Radon: (Attach the results of any radon test conducted in any building on the property)
Asbestos: (Describe any evidence of materials that are likely to contain asbestos. Check roof, exterior,
pipe coverings, spray-on fire proofing, cement sheet, etc. Describe the types, amounts and condition of
materials intact or deteriorating)
Fill: (If fill has ever been brought to the property, indicate where and when it was placed and where it
came from)
29. Grading: (If there has been any grading or disturbance to the soil, indicate why)
Chemicals: (If any chemicals have been used on the property, indicate the types of chemicals, how
they were used and where and how they were stored. Chemicals are industrial materials, cleaning
compounds, lubricating agents, greases, oils, heating fluids, gasoline, pesticides; i.e. insecticides,
herbicides, fungicides and fertilizers and metals)
Waste Disposal: (If the property has been used to dispose of waste, indicate the kinds of materials
disposed and identify the method of disposal; i.e. burning, discharge to waterbody, dump, land
farming, landfill, recycled, settling ponds, surface impoundments, etc. Identify these sites on the
sketch map)
Material Method of Disposal
Appliances
Asbestos
Automobiles
Chemicals
Construction debris
Garbage (food wastes)
Household trash
Incinerator ash
Industrial wastes
(identify)
Mining wastes
Pesticide containers
Pesticides
Petroleum products
Sewage sludge
Tires
Other (identify)
30. Spills: (If there has been a chemical spill or leak on the property, indicate what was spilled, where it
was spilled, how much, and what actions were taken in response)
(Indicate if there has been any chemical spills or leaks on adjacent properties or in the surrounding
area)
Studies/Records/Enforcement:
Attach copies of any previous environmental assessments, tests, samplings or impact statements that
have been conducted for the property.
Indicate any communications the current landowner has had with any government agency concerning
environmental conditions on the property.
Indicate if government officials have ever investigated, cited or been involved with any violations of
any environmental law on this property or in the immediate area.
Does this property or any property within one-half mile radius appear on any list of “problem” sites
maintained by an environmental agency.
Summary: Summarize the overall condition of the property and your conclusions and/or
recommendations regarding the property.
Signature of Preparer: Date:
Signature of Reviewer: Date:
31. Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment (ESA)
Interview Form
Interview Conducted Name of
by: Interviewee:
Interview Date and Interviewee
Time: Relation to the
Property
Property Legal
Description:
Qrtr Sect Twp Rnge Mer
Current/Previous
Land Use:
How long have the current owners had the property?
To the best of your knowledge have any businesses occupied either all or portions of the property in the past, as owners, renters or
leasers?
To the best of your knowledge have portions of the property been owned, rented or leased to other businesses that could have
stored chemicals, washed machinery, or produced or used hazardous materials?
Are you aware of any past or current above ground or below ground storage tanks on the property or adjacent properties?
Are you aware of the storage of any chemicals/fuels or other hazardous materials that are, or were previously, stored on the
property or adjacent properties?
Are you aware of any hazardous material spills that have occurred on the property or adjacent properties?
Interview Limitations:
Signatures
Interviewee: ACA Interviewer: