Achieve competitive advantage through
innovative process management
With
Agenda
Introduction
Industry Success
Live Demo
Q&A
Janet Poses, Aconex
Derek Hoffine, Hensel Phelps
Hannah Hosch, Aconex
All
• Project complexity
• Contracting models
• Risk profiles
• Regulatory requirements
• Importance of repeat business
Trends for contractors
Copyright©2014byTheBostonConsultingGroup,Inc.Allrightsreserved.
Construction industry: Clear need for action
Wide gap in productivity improvement in manufacturing vs construction in the last decades
253
89
0
100
200
300
20051995 20101990 2000 201519851980197519701965
Labor productivity index1
Construction
Manufacturing
2.8x
1. P. Teichholz, "Labor-Productivity Declines in the Construction Industry: Causes and Remedies (Another Look)", AECbytes Viewpoint #67, March 14, 2013
1/3 automation
2/3 lean approach
Copyright©2014byTheBostonConsultingGroup,Inc.Allrightsreserved.
On average > 50% of activities are non-value adding activities
On-site processes
Products Organization
Stocks
Space
Movement
Rework
Waiting
Transport
Waste on construction sites1
0
20
40
60
80
100
%
100.043.5
16.3
12.9
7.0
6.7
6.0
3.3
1.41.30.90.60.1
Movingofmaterials
ofothercontractors
Defect-related
interruptions
Correction
ofdefects
Other
Materialcosts
Personnel-related
interruptions
Transportof
workequipment
Waiting
Cleanup
AV/alignment
andcoordination
Transportof
materials
Value-adding
activities
Total
Waste: 56.5%
1. Scope: time series study, n = 29
?
Waste should be identified in … Proportion of waste in processes
1 2 3
4 5 6
Schedule Deviations
Copyright©2014byTheBostonConsultingGroup,Inc.Allrightsreserved.
Increased
system takt
Significant improvements possible with Lean
Total cost of ownership (TCO) with 12–30% savings potential
100
90
80
0
100
TCO savingsService
business
TCO Standardization
and
modularization
Construction
site
management
Total
EPC
savings
Procurement
excellence
Process-based
end-to-end
management
Savings in %
of total cost1
5–15%
2–3%
2–4%
1–3%
2–5%
10–25%
12–30%
6–8% 4–7%10–20%
Time savings in % of
total project duration2
1. Calculation of savings based on the following cost shares: 10–15% planning, 50–60% offer processing incl. purchasing, 25–40% project execution
2. Construction phase corresponds to 50% time share
Note: Excluding levers "acquisition," "risk management," and "Lean organization and enablement," since they are not connected with direct savings; prerequisites
Source: VDMA study on construction site management 2009; BCG project experience
Optimized
service
Economies
of scale
Efficient
processes Product
optimization
Reduced
rework
20–35%Learning effectsIncreased efficiency
Process challenges
- Many organizations
- Non standard processes
- Geographically dispersed teams
- A ton of information
- Project complexity
- Differing client requirements
- Siloed systems
Solutions
- Process optimization
- Standardized automated processes
- Centralized management
- Project-wide tools and systems
- Flexible tools
- Secure accessible platform
Process challenges and solutions
How to standardize in the dynamic construction environment
Multi-tiered standardization
Universal
Project specific
Project type
Universal
Derek Hoffine
Operations Manager
14+ years with Hensel Phelps
“Built to innovate”
Hensel Phelps
– Hospitality
– Healthcare
– Aviation
– Federal
– Entertainment
– Correctional
– Aerospace
– Advanced technology
– Education
– Public, etc.
• Founded in 1937 – Greeley, CO
– 8 District Offices Across U.S.
• US National General Contractor
• Annual volume over $3 Billion
• Employee-owned
• Market Sectors:
Company culture
• People: Assign qualified, talented personnel and empower them to make decisions.
• Process: Provide our People with proven transitional and facility management
processes and operational procedures to accomplish their tasks and perform their
jobs.
• Partnership: Work collaboratively in a partnered approach with existing vendors,
suppliers, occupants, clients, and other resources without impacting operations.
• Technology: “We combine innovative technologies with time-tested processes to
keep our projects running smoothly through every phase.”
Overcoming challenges
• Different sectors
• Different client requirements (i.e. security)
• Project specific processes
• Access to information between platforms
• Access or availability of end user(s) to partner
Process management at Hensel Phelps
• Company-wide tools
• Continuous improvement
• Best results for clients
• Standardize when possible
• Configure when needed
Benjamin P. Grogan and Jerry L. Dove Federal Building
• $160 Million Design-Build project for the GSA.
• 380,000 GSF, LEED Platinum Core & Shell, LEED
Gold Commercial Interiors
• Tenant: The Federal Bureau of Investigation
(consolidation of South Florida forces)
• Custom design and materials
• 902 calendar days to design, construct, and turn
over facility to GSA, FBI, and O&M team.
Handover on a federal government building
Challenges
– O&M team not established
– High turnover ratio
– Security requirements/clearance
– Meeting GSA PBS 100 requirements
– Meeting Program of Requirements (POR)
Solutions
– Handover vehicle that meets client and
tenant security requirements
– Simple navigation tool for O&M personnel
with ease of use
– Secure vehicle for SBU “smart”
documents
Manual handover process
• Design in and build space for physical
hand over documents (plans, as-builts,
O&M manuals, etc.…)
• Redundant training of personnel
• Access to information in a timely manner
• Construction personnel frequently
troubleshooting for user one year after
completion of project
With handover tool
• O&M Staff well trained and prepared with the
correct tools (i.e. Smart Manuals)
• Efficient and thorough troubleshooting of
equipment
• Reduction in non-valid work orders submitted
during warranty period
• Effective partnering goals with user and O&M
staff at 11-month warranty review
• Summation of final as-builts, approved product
literature, etc.
• Enhanced readable documents and training
video’s housed in one vehicle
Process management best practices/lessons learned
• Understand your processes and have a way to measure
process performance.
• Get everyone on the project team on the same page and
system.
• Look beyond the construction phase to realize full ROI.
• Adopt technology solutions that are adaptable to any
processes utilized or required by the project or client.
• Operations is a measure of construction success
– Improved efficiency within the first 6 months of warranty
– Mandatory 11-month warranty walk
Why Hensel Phelps chose Aconex on the Benjamin P. Grogan
and Jerry L. Dove Federal Building
• Met client requirements
– Implementation of SBU documents
– GSA Facility Management Guidelines
• Secure Collaboration System
– Meets GSA Firewall Data Workflow
• Project-wide access by all team members
• Easy to deploy
• Intuitive interface for ongoing maintenance
• Collaborative with multiple system interfaces
Hensel Phelps streamlines handover process
Benjamin P. Grogan & Jerry L. Dove Federal Building
Challenges Aconex Solution Results
GSA’s security protocols required
 Compliance & confidentiality
Physical handover CDs or binders
 Misplaced handover
information
Special software or training needed for
contractor
 Accessibility = difficult
Streamlined assembly
Documents, designs, decisions, and reviews all
in one place
Secure handover
Asset info + O&M can’t be lost, 100% accurate,
eliminating risk of rework
Instant access
Easily access O&M info from any device =
client satisfaction
$30%
Time saved in compiling handover
materials
Compliance with GSA guidelines
and security
0 support calls
first 6 months = happy clients
How BIM can accelerate project-wide
review cycles
Using Aconex to your competitive advantage
Hannah Hosch
Client Services Manager
Field
Inspections
Connecting teams project-wide
OperateConstructDesignBidPlan
Document
Control
RFIs &
Change Orders
Bidding &
Tenders
Workflows &
Approvals
BIM
Collaboration
Submittals Handover to
Operations
Cost
Management
Dashboards
& Reporting
In projects executed
on the platform
$1+
trillion
Documents managed
with complete auditability
1.2+
billion
User organizations
Interfacing efficiently
60+
thousand
Connected
Departments
Design
Cost
Schedule
Safety
Contracts
Project performance depends on connected teams
Connected
Field & Office
Subcontractors
Connected
Organizations
Owner
General
Contractor
Many-Company
Collaboration
Complex information
exchange between
many organizations
Field focus
Optimise for
field specific processes
Data moving through the
lifecycle
Connected data for
better lifecycle
management
Insights &
Early Warnings
Help users understand
where they can do
better and what to
focus on
Process driven
Facilitating key
processes, including
cost & payments
with focus on user
experience
Improve the lives of our users in Construction & Engineering
Collaboration
between many
companies
Workflow & process
driven
Field
focus
Insights &
early warnings
“Digital Twin”
Tools for your job
The audit trail for the industry
Industry-wide network
What Aconex is delivering
Project management challenges
25
53%
said lack of timely
performance data drove
significant overruns
Captures all project process?
Is information credible?
Right level?
Real-time, reliable?
Project S-curve
Measuring project performance across cost & schedule
Insights at every level
26
Process
Tasks
Project
Portfolio
Connected cost management
Subcontractor
RFI with cost
impact
GC raises
potential change
order
Forecast includes
early warning
Approve contract
change order
RFI captures
cost impact
details
Change order
status Cost impact amount
Point-and-click
report builder
Approved & pending
contract changes captured
A single view across every change order
status & the ability to take action
Manage upstream & downstream
contracts, changes, & pay apps
Due dates, status, and days
late for each review cycle
Connected submittals
Summary of overall
progress
Drill into package:
enforce contractual
turnaround times
Track submission &
review status for each
package document
Report on workflow
stages
Connected
organizations
Who is
accountable?
What’s in your court?
What’s outstanding?
When is it due?
What’s the
status?
Competitive advantage through innovative process management
• Overview
• RFIs
• Submittals
• Insights and reporting
• Handover
We presented a live Aconex demo. Please get your demo please visit aconex.com/Demo.
$5M
in labor savings
over 4 years
75%
reduction in payment
processing time to
contractors
75%
reduction in design
review cycle times
80%
reduction in change
request cycles times
C$798K
projected savings from doc
control costs over next 5 years
50%
Decreases in RFI
turnaround times
50%
decrease in document
processing times
30%
Reduction in time to import
handover information
C$4M
Savings from
printing costs
Leading Organizations Are Seeing The Results Of Digitization
Significant efficiency and productivity gains from automating key project processes
Delivering your projects with confidence
Client-centered innovation
• Product roadmap shaped with industry experience
• 200+ strong product development team
Proven engagement model
• Global team of industry experts that understand your business
• Consistent approach and quality with rapid deployment and scale
The leader in online collaboration
• Purpose-built solutions
• Proven success delivering projects and programs around the world
Nine of the top 10
global EPCs
23 of ENR’s top 25
global design firms
Every Fortune 500
construction and
engineering firm
More successful projects delivered than any other platform,
industry-wide
Our thanks to Hensel Phelps
Learn more at
aconex.com/Video

Achieve competitive advantage through innovative process management

  • 1.
    Achieve competitive advantagethrough innovative process management With
  • 2.
    Agenda Introduction Industry Success Live Demo Q&A JanetPoses, Aconex Derek Hoffine, Hensel Phelps Hannah Hosch, Aconex All
  • 3.
    • Project complexity •Contracting models • Risk profiles • Regulatory requirements • Importance of repeat business Trends for contractors
  • 4.
    Copyright©2014byTheBostonConsultingGroup,Inc.Allrightsreserved. Construction industry: Clearneed for action Wide gap in productivity improvement in manufacturing vs construction in the last decades 253 89 0 100 200 300 20051995 20101990 2000 201519851980197519701965 Labor productivity index1 Construction Manufacturing 2.8x 1. P. Teichholz, "Labor-Productivity Declines in the Construction Industry: Causes and Remedies (Another Look)", AECbytes Viewpoint #67, March 14, 2013 1/3 automation 2/3 lean approach
  • 5.
    Copyright©2014byTheBostonConsultingGroup,Inc.Allrightsreserved. On average >50% of activities are non-value adding activities On-site processes Products Organization Stocks Space Movement Rework Waiting Transport Waste on construction sites1 0 20 40 60 80 100 % 100.043.5 16.3 12.9 7.0 6.7 6.0 3.3 1.41.30.90.60.1 Movingofmaterials ofothercontractors Defect-related interruptions Correction ofdefects Other Materialcosts Personnel-related interruptions Transportof workequipment Waiting Cleanup AV/alignment andcoordination Transportof materials Value-adding activities Total Waste: 56.5% 1. Scope: time series study, n = 29 ? Waste should be identified in … Proportion of waste in processes 1 2 3 4 5 6 Schedule Deviations
  • 6.
    Copyright©2014byTheBostonConsultingGroup,Inc.Allrightsreserved. Increased system takt Significant improvementspossible with Lean Total cost of ownership (TCO) with 12–30% savings potential 100 90 80 0 100 TCO savingsService business TCO Standardization and modularization Construction site management Total EPC savings Procurement excellence Process-based end-to-end management Savings in % of total cost1 5–15% 2–3% 2–4% 1–3% 2–5% 10–25% 12–30% 6–8% 4–7%10–20% Time savings in % of total project duration2 1. Calculation of savings based on the following cost shares: 10–15% planning, 50–60% offer processing incl. purchasing, 25–40% project execution 2. Construction phase corresponds to 50% time share Note: Excluding levers "acquisition," "risk management," and "Lean organization and enablement," since they are not connected with direct savings; prerequisites Source: VDMA study on construction site management 2009; BCG project experience Optimized service Economies of scale Efficient processes Product optimization Reduced rework 20–35%Learning effectsIncreased efficiency
  • 7.
    Process challenges - Manyorganizations - Non standard processes - Geographically dispersed teams - A ton of information - Project complexity - Differing client requirements - Siloed systems Solutions - Process optimization - Standardized automated processes - Centralized management - Project-wide tools and systems - Flexible tools - Secure accessible platform Process challenges and solutions
  • 8.
    How to standardizein the dynamic construction environment Multi-tiered standardization Universal Project specific Project type Universal
  • 9.
    Derek Hoffine Operations Manager 14+years with Hensel Phelps “Built to innovate”
  • 10.
    Hensel Phelps – Hospitality –Healthcare – Aviation – Federal – Entertainment – Correctional – Aerospace – Advanced technology – Education – Public, etc. • Founded in 1937 – Greeley, CO – 8 District Offices Across U.S. • US National General Contractor • Annual volume over $3 Billion • Employee-owned • Market Sectors:
  • 11.
    Company culture • People:Assign qualified, talented personnel and empower them to make decisions. • Process: Provide our People with proven transitional and facility management processes and operational procedures to accomplish their tasks and perform their jobs. • Partnership: Work collaboratively in a partnered approach with existing vendors, suppliers, occupants, clients, and other resources without impacting operations. • Technology: “We combine innovative technologies with time-tested processes to keep our projects running smoothly through every phase.”
  • 12.
    Overcoming challenges • Differentsectors • Different client requirements (i.e. security) • Project specific processes • Access to information between platforms • Access or availability of end user(s) to partner
  • 13.
    Process management atHensel Phelps • Company-wide tools • Continuous improvement • Best results for clients • Standardize when possible • Configure when needed
  • 14.
    Benjamin P. Groganand Jerry L. Dove Federal Building • $160 Million Design-Build project for the GSA. • 380,000 GSF, LEED Platinum Core & Shell, LEED Gold Commercial Interiors • Tenant: The Federal Bureau of Investigation (consolidation of South Florida forces) • Custom design and materials • 902 calendar days to design, construct, and turn over facility to GSA, FBI, and O&M team.
  • 15.
    Handover on afederal government building Challenges – O&M team not established – High turnover ratio – Security requirements/clearance – Meeting GSA PBS 100 requirements – Meeting Program of Requirements (POR) Solutions – Handover vehicle that meets client and tenant security requirements – Simple navigation tool for O&M personnel with ease of use – Secure vehicle for SBU “smart” documents
  • 16.
    Manual handover process •Design in and build space for physical hand over documents (plans, as-builts, O&M manuals, etc.…) • Redundant training of personnel • Access to information in a timely manner • Construction personnel frequently troubleshooting for user one year after completion of project
  • 17.
    With handover tool •O&M Staff well trained and prepared with the correct tools (i.e. Smart Manuals) • Efficient and thorough troubleshooting of equipment • Reduction in non-valid work orders submitted during warranty period • Effective partnering goals with user and O&M staff at 11-month warranty review • Summation of final as-builts, approved product literature, etc. • Enhanced readable documents and training video’s housed in one vehicle
  • 18.
    Process management bestpractices/lessons learned • Understand your processes and have a way to measure process performance. • Get everyone on the project team on the same page and system. • Look beyond the construction phase to realize full ROI. • Adopt technology solutions that are adaptable to any processes utilized or required by the project or client. • Operations is a measure of construction success – Improved efficiency within the first 6 months of warranty – Mandatory 11-month warranty walk
  • 19.
    Why Hensel Phelpschose Aconex on the Benjamin P. Grogan and Jerry L. Dove Federal Building • Met client requirements – Implementation of SBU documents – GSA Facility Management Guidelines • Secure Collaboration System – Meets GSA Firewall Data Workflow • Project-wide access by all team members • Easy to deploy • Intuitive interface for ongoing maintenance • Collaborative with multiple system interfaces
  • 20.
    Hensel Phelps streamlineshandover process Benjamin P. Grogan & Jerry L. Dove Federal Building Challenges Aconex Solution Results GSA’s security protocols required  Compliance & confidentiality Physical handover CDs or binders  Misplaced handover information Special software or training needed for contractor  Accessibility = difficult Streamlined assembly Documents, designs, decisions, and reviews all in one place Secure handover Asset info + O&M can’t be lost, 100% accurate, eliminating risk of rework Instant access Easily access O&M info from any device = client satisfaction $30% Time saved in compiling handover materials Compliance with GSA guidelines and security 0 support calls first 6 months = happy clients
  • 21.
    How BIM canaccelerate project-wide review cycles Using Aconex to your competitive advantage Hannah Hosch Client Services Manager
  • 22.
    Field Inspections Connecting teams project-wide OperateConstructDesignBidPlan Document Control RFIs& Change Orders Bidding & Tenders Workflows & Approvals BIM Collaboration Submittals Handover to Operations Cost Management Dashboards & Reporting In projects executed on the platform $1+ trillion Documents managed with complete auditability 1.2+ billion User organizations Interfacing efficiently 60+ thousand
  • 23.
    Connected Departments Design Cost Schedule Safety Contracts Project performance dependson connected teams Connected Field & Office Subcontractors Connected Organizations Owner General Contractor
  • 24.
    Many-Company Collaboration Complex information exchange between manyorganizations Field focus Optimise for field specific processes Data moving through the lifecycle Connected data for better lifecycle management Insights & Early Warnings Help users understand where they can do better and what to focus on Process driven Facilitating key processes, including cost & payments with focus on user experience Improve the lives of our users in Construction & Engineering Collaboration between many companies Workflow & process driven Field focus Insights & early warnings “Digital Twin” Tools for your job The audit trail for the industry Industry-wide network What Aconex is delivering
  • 25.
    Project management challenges 25 53% saidlack of timely performance data drove significant overruns Captures all project process? Is information credible? Right level? Real-time, reliable? Project S-curve Measuring project performance across cost & schedule
  • 26.
    Insights at everylevel 26 Process Tasks Project Portfolio
  • 27.
    Connected cost management Subcontractor RFIwith cost impact GC raises potential change order Forecast includes early warning Approve contract change order RFI captures cost impact details Change order status Cost impact amount Point-and-click report builder Approved & pending contract changes captured A single view across every change order status & the ability to take action Manage upstream & downstream contracts, changes, & pay apps
  • 28.
    Due dates, status,and days late for each review cycle Connected submittals Summary of overall progress Drill into package: enforce contractual turnaround times Track submission & review status for each package document Report on workflow stages Connected organizations Who is accountable? What’s in your court? What’s outstanding? When is it due? What’s the status?
  • 29.
    Competitive advantage throughinnovative process management • Overview • RFIs • Submittals • Insights and reporting • Handover We presented a live Aconex demo. Please get your demo please visit aconex.com/Demo.
  • 30.
    $5M in labor savings over4 years 75% reduction in payment processing time to contractors 75% reduction in design review cycle times 80% reduction in change request cycles times C$798K projected savings from doc control costs over next 5 years 50% Decreases in RFI turnaround times 50% decrease in document processing times 30% Reduction in time to import handover information C$4M Savings from printing costs Leading Organizations Are Seeing The Results Of Digitization Significant efficiency and productivity gains from automating key project processes
  • 31.
    Delivering your projectswith confidence Client-centered innovation • Product roadmap shaped with industry experience • 200+ strong product development team Proven engagement model • Global team of industry experts that understand your business • Consistent approach and quality with rapid deployment and scale The leader in online collaboration • Purpose-built solutions • Proven success delivering projects and programs around the world
  • 32.
    Nine of thetop 10 global EPCs 23 of ENR’s top 25 global design firms Every Fortune 500 construction and engineering firm More successful projects delivered than any other platform, industry-wide
  • 33.
    Our thanks toHensel Phelps Learn more at aconex.com/Video

Editor's Notes

  • #6  Through identifying waste and inefficiencies and implementing standard efficient processes, we have seen a dramatic decrease in the total cost of ownership of an asset. [CLICK]
  • #7  These savings are a result of our total Excellence in Construction framework, including Lean construction, which looks at construction as a project based production process to optimize overall efficiency. [CLICK]