SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 31
Download to read offline
June 1, 2016
2016 City of Dallas
Community Survey
Findings
More than 2,000,000 persons surveyed since 2006 for more than 800
cities in 49 states, including 12 of the 20 largest US cities and
11 of the 20 largest US counties.
A National Leader in Market Research for
Local Governmental Organizations
…helping city and county governments gather and use survey data to enhance organizational performance for 30 years
2
 Dallas, TX
 San Antonio, TX
 Austin, TX
 Las Vegas, NV
 Detroit, MI
 Boston, MA
 Miami-Dade County, FL
 Seattle, WA
 San Diego, CA
 Columbus, OH
 Oklahoma City, OK
 Louisville, KY
 Houston, TX
 Indianapolis, IN
 Charlotte, NC
 Nashville, TN
 Fort Worth, TX
 Denver, CO
 New York, NY
 El Paso, TX
 Tucson, AZ
 Portland, OR
 Milwaukee
 San Diego, CA
Communities with Populations
Above 500,000 in
ETC Institute’s Database
ETC Institute
maintains data
for 24 of the 34
US cities with
populations
above 500,000
3
Agenda
• Purpose
• Survey methodology
• Bottom line up front
• Major findings
• Summary and conclusions
• Questions
4
• Gather input from residents to
objectively assess the quality of City
services
• Track the City’s performance over
time
• Help identify opportunities for
improvement
Purpose
5
Survey Methodology
• Survey description:
– survey was 7 pages long
– took 15-20 minutes to complete
• Sample size: 1,512 completed surveys
– at least 100 surveys were completed per district
• Method of administration:
– by mail with follow-up by phone and e-mail
– randomly selected sample of households in the City
– results valid for 14 council districts
• Confidence level: 95%
• Margin of error: +/- 2.5% overall
• GIS mapping
6
Good representation by district
2016 City of Dallas Community Survey
Location of Respondents
7
8
 Although there are opportunities for improvement,
the City is heading in the right direction.
 The City’s overall satisfaction index is at an all-time
high
 Overall satisfaction with City services is 17% above
the national average for large US cities
 Dallas is setting the standard for customer service
among large U.S. cities
 Overall satisfaction with city services is similar in
most areas of the City
 Top priorities for residents were: infrastructure
maintenance, code enforcement, & police services
Major finding #1
Residents generally have a
positive perception of the City
9
77% of the residents surveyed rated the overall quality of life in Dallas as “excellent” or “good”,
which is an increase of 4% from the 2014 survey 10
Most residents gave positive ratings for Dallas as a place to work, do business, and live 11
Dissatisfaction was low in all of the areas rated within this category 12
With the exception of the maintenance of infrastructure, the percentage of “excellent/good” ratings
exceeded the percentage of “poor “ratings 13
Major finding #2
While there are some differences
for specific services, overall
satisfaction with City services is
about the same in most areas of
the City
14
2016 Dallas
Community
Survey
Shading reflects the mean rating for all
respondents by District
Ratings of the Overall Quality of Governmental
Services Provided by The City of Dallas
15
Satisfaction is about the Same in
Most Areas of the City
Legend
Mean rating on a 4-point scale
ETC INSTITUTE
1.0-1.75 Poor
1.75-2.5 Fair
2.5-3.25 Good
3.25-4.0 Excellent
No Response
Major finding #3
The City is moving in the right
direction
16
Significantly higher than 2009: Significantly lower than 2009: 17
Changes of 3 points or more are significant
The overall satisfaction index for Dallas is 3.6 points higher than in 2014, and 7.1 points
higher than in 2009; the national average has decreased by nearly 5 points since 2009 18
Dallas has performed well
while most other large cities
have seen decreases in
satisfaction ratings during
the past 5 years
Changes of 3 points or more are significant
Significantly higher than 2009: Significantly lower than 2009: 19
Changes of 3 percent or more is significant
Significantly higher than 2014: Significantly lower than 2014: 20
Changes of 3 percent or more is significant
Satisfaction with the
overall quality of
services provided by
the City of Dallas is at
an all-time high
Most Notable INCREASES from
2014-2016
(areas where ratings increased by 8% or more)
 +19% City’s parks and recreation system (2014=59%, 2016=78%)
 +17% Customer service by city employees (2014=50%, 2016=67%)
 +13% Public library services (2014=76%, 2016=89%)
 +12% Public information services (2014=59%, 2016=71%)
 +12% Arts and cultural programs (2014=84%, 2016=96%)
 +10% Sewer services (2014=72%, 2016=82%)
 +10% Storm drainage (2014=64%, 2016=74%)
 + 9% Drinking water (2014=69%, 2016=78%)
 + 8% Job opportunities (2014=69%, 2016=77%)
21
22
 -12% Land use, planning and zoning (2014=53%, 2016=41%)
 - 8% Feeling of safety in downtown after dark (2014=24%, 2016=16%)
 - 8% Response time by police to emergencies (2014=55%, 2016=47%)
Most Notable DECREASES from
2014-2016
(areas where ratings decreased by 8% or more)
Major finding #4
The City of Dallas is setting the
standard for service delivery
compared to other large cities
23
Significantly higher: Significantly lower: 24
Dallas rated
significantly
above
the national
average in all
six areas
Significantly higher: Significantly lower: 25
Dallas rated
significantly
above
the national
average in all
three areas
Major finding #5
26
Although there are
opportunities for
improvement, the City is
heading in the right
direction.
Overall Priorities: 27
28
29
 Although there are opportunities for improvement,
the City is heading in the right direction.
 The City’s overall satisfaction index is at an all-time
high
 Overall satisfaction with City services is 17% above
the national average for large US cities
 Dallas is setting the standard for customer service
among large U.S. cities
 Overall satisfaction with city services is similar in
most areas of the City
 Top priorities for residents were: infrastructure
maintenance, code enforcement, & police services
Questions?
THANK YOU
30

More Related Content

Similar to A_2016 City of Dallas Community Survey Findings_Combined_060116.pdf

Data Mining for Community Needs Assessments
Data Mining for Community Needs AssessmentsData Mining for Community Needs Assessments
Data Mining for Community Needs Assessments
Avery Eenigenburg
 

Similar to A_2016 City of Dallas Community Survey Findings_Combined_060116.pdf (20)

College Station 2016 Citizen Survey Results
College Station 2016 Citizen Survey ResultsCollege Station 2016 Citizen Survey Results
College Station 2016 Citizen Survey Results
 
UGRA Symposium poster
UGRA Symposium posterUGRA Symposium poster
UGRA Symposium poster
 
Oakland Chamber of Commerce 2014 Mayoral Poll
Oakland Chamber of Commerce 2014 Mayoral PollOakland Chamber of Commerce 2014 Mayoral Poll
Oakland Chamber of Commerce 2014 Mayoral Poll
 
Metro Atlanta Speaks 2015 Summary Slides
Metro Atlanta Speaks 2015 Summary SlidesMetro Atlanta Speaks 2015 Summary Slides
Metro Atlanta Speaks 2015 Summary Slides
 
ATS14- What meaningful engagement means: capacity-building as a tool to impro...
ATS14- What meaningful engagement means: capacity-building as a tool to impro...ATS14- What meaningful engagement means: capacity-building as a tool to impro...
ATS14- What meaningful engagement means: capacity-building as a tool to impro...
 
Do Metro Atlanta Residents Have Access to Jobs & Amenities?
Do Metro Atlanta Residents Have Access to Jobs & Amenities?Do Metro Atlanta Residents Have Access to Jobs & Amenities?
Do Metro Atlanta Residents Have Access to Jobs & Amenities?
 
Plan Book Final
Plan Book FinalPlan Book Final
Plan Book Final
 
2014 City of Des Peres Community Survey: Final Report
2014 City of Des Peres Community Survey: Final Report2014 City of Des Peres Community Survey: Final Report
2014 City of Des Peres Community Survey: Final Report
 
Final report 12 12 13 small revised 201404151512413349
Final report 12 12 13 small revised 201404151512413349Final report 12 12 13 small revised 201404151512413349
Final report 12 12 13 small revised 201404151512413349
 
2016 Metro Atlanta Speaks Survey Results- Regional Snapshot
2016 Metro Atlanta Speaks Survey Results- Regional Snapshot2016 Metro Atlanta Speaks Survey Results- Regional Snapshot
2016 Metro Atlanta Speaks Survey Results- Regional Snapshot
 
The Equipt to Innovate(tm) Lightning Round: Governing's Government Performanc...
The Equipt to Innovate(tm) Lightning Round: Governing's Government Performanc...The Equipt to Innovate(tm) Lightning Round: Governing's Government Performanc...
The Equipt to Innovate(tm) Lightning Round: Governing's Government Performanc...
 
Park_Alequresh_ACDEB-Local-Perspectives_Dec2020_FINAL.pptx
Park_Alequresh_ACDEB-Local-Perspectives_Dec2020_FINAL.pptxPark_Alequresh_ACDEB-Local-Perspectives_Dec2020_FINAL.pptx
Park_Alequresh_ACDEB-Local-Perspectives_Dec2020_FINAL.pptx
 
Career city index
Career city indexCareer city index
Career city index
 
Votus pitchdeck august2016_v6
Votus pitchdeck august2016_v6Votus pitchdeck august2016_v6
Votus pitchdeck august2016_v6
 
Survey of Area Leaders
Survey of Area LeadersSurvey of Area Leaders
Survey of Area Leaders
 
Good Enough is No Longer Good Enough
Good Enough is No Longer Good EnoughGood Enough is No Longer Good Enough
Good Enough is No Longer Good Enough
 
2014 CityMatters Survey Results
2014 CityMatters Survey Results2014 CityMatters Survey Results
2014 CityMatters Survey Results
 
Transportation Big Picture Messaging
Transportation Big Picture MessagingTransportation Big Picture Messaging
Transportation Big Picture Messaging
 
The Loss of the Long-Form Census and the effects on the ability to do Neighbo...
The Loss of the Long-Form Census and the effects on the ability to do Neighbo...The Loss of the Long-Form Census and the effects on the ability to do Neighbo...
The Loss of the Long-Form Census and the effects on the ability to do Neighbo...
 
Data Mining for Community Needs Assessments
Data Mining for Community Needs AssessmentsData Mining for Community Needs Assessments
Data Mining for Community Needs Assessments
 

Recently uploaded

Low Atmospheric Pressure Stunning is not a humane alternative to Carbon Dioxi...
Low Atmospheric Pressure Stunning is not a humane alternative to Carbon Dioxi...Low Atmospheric Pressure Stunning is not a humane alternative to Carbon Dioxi...
Low Atmospheric Pressure Stunning is not a humane alternative to Carbon Dioxi...
Harm Kiezebrink
 

Recently uploaded (20)

PPT Item # 5 -- Announcements Powerpoint
PPT Item # 5 -- Announcements PowerpointPPT Item # 5 -- Announcements Powerpoint
PPT Item # 5 -- Announcements Powerpoint
 
EDI Executive Education MasterClass- 15thMay 2024 (updated).pdf
EDI Executive Education MasterClass- 15thMay 2024 (updated).pdfEDI Executive Education MasterClass- 15thMay 2024 (updated).pdf
EDI Executive Education MasterClass- 15thMay 2024 (updated).pdf
 
Managing large-scale outbreaks at Farrow-to-Weaner Farms
Managing large-scale outbreaks at Farrow-to-Weaner FarmsManaging large-scale outbreaks at Farrow-to-Weaner Farms
Managing large-scale outbreaks at Farrow-to-Weaner Farms
 
NGO working for orphan children’s education kurnool
NGO working for orphan children’s education kurnoolNGO working for orphan children’s education kurnool
NGO working for orphan children’s education kurnool
 
bee engaged with youth - World Bee Day 2024
bee engaged with youth - World Bee Day 2024bee engaged with youth - World Bee Day 2024
bee engaged with youth - World Bee Day 2024
 
“Bee engaged with Youth”. World Bee Day 2024; May. 20th.
“Bee engaged with Youth”. World Bee Day 2024; May. 20th.“Bee engaged with Youth”. World Bee Day 2024; May. 20th.
“Bee engaged with Youth”. World Bee Day 2024; May. 20th.
 
Characterizing wildlife trafficking and associated crime.
Characterizing wildlife trafficking and associated crime.Characterizing wildlife trafficking and associated crime.
Characterizing wildlife trafficking and associated crime.
 
The impact and warm of wildlife crime - 2024 World Wildlife Crime Report.
The impact and warm of wildlife crime - 2024 World Wildlife Crime Report.The impact and warm of wildlife crime - 2024 World Wildlife Crime Report.
The impact and warm of wildlife crime - 2024 World Wildlife Crime Report.
 
16 may, International Day of Living together in peace 2024
16 may, International Day of Living together in peace 202416 may, International Day of Living together in peace 2024
16 may, International Day of Living together in peace 2024
 
Ian Bremmer's message for those graduating in toxic times.pdf
Ian Bremmer's message for those graduating in toxic times.pdfIan Bremmer's message for those graduating in toxic times.pdf
Ian Bremmer's message for those graduating in toxic times.pdf
 
International Day of Families - 15 May 2024 - UNDESA.
International Day of Families - 15 May 2024 - UNDESA.International Day of Families - 15 May 2024 - UNDESA.
International Day of Families - 15 May 2024 - UNDESA.
 
Item # 7-8 - 6900 Broadway P&Z Case # 438
Item # 7-8 - 6900 Broadway P&Z Case # 438Item # 7-8 - 6900 Broadway P&Z Case # 438
Item # 7-8 - 6900 Broadway P&Z Case # 438
 
Introduction to The Guidelines for the Long-term Sustainability of Outer Spac...
Introduction to The Guidelines for the Long-term Sustainability of Outer Spac...Introduction to The Guidelines for the Long-term Sustainability of Outer Spac...
Introduction to The Guidelines for the Long-term Sustainability of Outer Spac...
 
Building a better Britain: How cities like Bradford can help to end economic ...
Building a better Britain: How cities like Bradford can help to end economic ...Building a better Britain: How cities like Bradford can help to end economic ...
Building a better Britain: How cities like Bradford can help to end economic ...
 
World Wildlife Crime Report 2024 - Introduction
World Wildlife Crime Report 2024 - IntroductionWorld Wildlife Crime Report 2024 - Introduction
World Wildlife Crime Report 2024 - Introduction
 
Families and Climate Change - iyf30 - IDF.2024 AGENDA PROGRAMME.
Families and Climate Change - iyf30 - IDF.2024 AGENDA PROGRAMME.Families and Climate Change - iyf30 - IDF.2024 AGENDA PROGRAMME.
Families and Climate Change - iyf30 - IDF.2024 AGENDA PROGRAMME.
 
RPO America Peer Exchange: Rural Transportation Planning Programs
RPO America Peer Exchange: Rural Transportation Planning ProgramsRPO America Peer Exchange: Rural Transportation Planning Programs
RPO America Peer Exchange: Rural Transportation Planning Programs
 
Low Atmospheric Pressure Stunning is not a humane alternative to Carbon Dioxi...
Low Atmospheric Pressure Stunning is not a humane alternative to Carbon Dioxi...Low Atmospheric Pressure Stunning is not a humane alternative to Carbon Dioxi...
Low Atmospheric Pressure Stunning is not a humane alternative to Carbon Dioxi...
 
Harbin-Gross-Spring2022.pdf Yale Historical Review
Harbin-Gross-Spring2022.pdf Yale Historical ReviewHarbin-Gross-Spring2022.pdf Yale Historical Review
Harbin-Gross-Spring2022.pdf Yale Historical Review
 
Finland's mental health policy and its implementation: a CSO perspective
Finland's mental health policy and its implementation: a CSO perspectiveFinland's mental health policy and its implementation: a CSO perspective
Finland's mental health policy and its implementation: a CSO perspective
 

A_2016 City of Dallas Community Survey Findings_Combined_060116.pdf

  • 1.
  • 2. June 1, 2016 2016 City of Dallas Community Survey Findings
  • 3. More than 2,000,000 persons surveyed since 2006 for more than 800 cities in 49 states, including 12 of the 20 largest US cities and 11 of the 20 largest US counties. A National Leader in Market Research for Local Governmental Organizations …helping city and county governments gather and use survey data to enhance organizational performance for 30 years 2
  • 4.  Dallas, TX  San Antonio, TX  Austin, TX  Las Vegas, NV  Detroit, MI  Boston, MA  Miami-Dade County, FL  Seattle, WA  San Diego, CA  Columbus, OH  Oklahoma City, OK  Louisville, KY  Houston, TX  Indianapolis, IN  Charlotte, NC  Nashville, TN  Fort Worth, TX  Denver, CO  New York, NY  El Paso, TX  Tucson, AZ  Portland, OR  Milwaukee  San Diego, CA Communities with Populations Above 500,000 in ETC Institute’s Database ETC Institute maintains data for 24 of the 34 US cities with populations above 500,000 3
  • 5. Agenda • Purpose • Survey methodology • Bottom line up front • Major findings • Summary and conclusions • Questions 4
  • 6. • Gather input from residents to objectively assess the quality of City services • Track the City’s performance over time • Help identify opportunities for improvement Purpose 5
  • 7. Survey Methodology • Survey description: – survey was 7 pages long – took 15-20 minutes to complete • Sample size: 1,512 completed surveys – at least 100 surveys were completed per district • Method of administration: – by mail with follow-up by phone and e-mail – randomly selected sample of households in the City – results valid for 14 council districts • Confidence level: 95% • Margin of error: +/- 2.5% overall • GIS mapping 6
  • 8. Good representation by district 2016 City of Dallas Community Survey Location of Respondents 7
  • 9. 8  Although there are opportunities for improvement, the City is heading in the right direction.  The City’s overall satisfaction index is at an all-time high  Overall satisfaction with City services is 17% above the national average for large US cities  Dallas is setting the standard for customer service among large U.S. cities  Overall satisfaction with city services is similar in most areas of the City  Top priorities for residents were: infrastructure maintenance, code enforcement, & police services
  • 10. Major finding #1 Residents generally have a positive perception of the City 9
  • 11. 77% of the residents surveyed rated the overall quality of life in Dallas as “excellent” or “good”, which is an increase of 4% from the 2014 survey 10
  • 12. Most residents gave positive ratings for Dallas as a place to work, do business, and live 11
  • 13. Dissatisfaction was low in all of the areas rated within this category 12
  • 14. With the exception of the maintenance of infrastructure, the percentage of “excellent/good” ratings exceeded the percentage of “poor “ratings 13
  • 15. Major finding #2 While there are some differences for specific services, overall satisfaction with City services is about the same in most areas of the City 14
  • 16. 2016 Dallas Community Survey Shading reflects the mean rating for all respondents by District Ratings of the Overall Quality of Governmental Services Provided by The City of Dallas 15 Satisfaction is about the Same in Most Areas of the City Legend Mean rating on a 4-point scale ETC INSTITUTE 1.0-1.75 Poor 1.75-2.5 Fair 2.5-3.25 Good 3.25-4.0 Excellent No Response
  • 17. Major finding #3 The City is moving in the right direction 16
  • 18. Significantly higher than 2009: Significantly lower than 2009: 17 Changes of 3 points or more are significant
  • 19. The overall satisfaction index for Dallas is 3.6 points higher than in 2014, and 7.1 points higher than in 2009; the national average has decreased by nearly 5 points since 2009 18 Dallas has performed well while most other large cities have seen decreases in satisfaction ratings during the past 5 years Changes of 3 points or more are significant
  • 20. Significantly higher than 2009: Significantly lower than 2009: 19 Changes of 3 percent or more is significant
  • 21. Significantly higher than 2014: Significantly lower than 2014: 20 Changes of 3 percent or more is significant Satisfaction with the overall quality of services provided by the City of Dallas is at an all-time high
  • 22. Most Notable INCREASES from 2014-2016 (areas where ratings increased by 8% or more)  +19% City’s parks and recreation system (2014=59%, 2016=78%)  +17% Customer service by city employees (2014=50%, 2016=67%)  +13% Public library services (2014=76%, 2016=89%)  +12% Public information services (2014=59%, 2016=71%)  +12% Arts and cultural programs (2014=84%, 2016=96%)  +10% Sewer services (2014=72%, 2016=82%)  +10% Storm drainage (2014=64%, 2016=74%)  + 9% Drinking water (2014=69%, 2016=78%)  + 8% Job opportunities (2014=69%, 2016=77%) 21
  • 23. 22  -12% Land use, planning and zoning (2014=53%, 2016=41%)  - 8% Feeling of safety in downtown after dark (2014=24%, 2016=16%)  - 8% Response time by police to emergencies (2014=55%, 2016=47%) Most Notable DECREASES from 2014-2016 (areas where ratings decreased by 8% or more)
  • 24. Major finding #4 The City of Dallas is setting the standard for service delivery compared to other large cities 23
  • 25. Significantly higher: Significantly lower: 24 Dallas rated significantly above the national average in all six areas
  • 26. Significantly higher: Significantly lower: 25 Dallas rated significantly above the national average in all three areas
  • 27. Major finding #5 26 Although there are opportunities for improvement, the City is heading in the right direction.
  • 29. 28
  • 30. 29  Although there are opportunities for improvement, the City is heading in the right direction.  The City’s overall satisfaction index is at an all-time high  Overall satisfaction with City services is 17% above the national average for large US cities  Dallas is setting the standard for customer service among large U.S. cities  Overall satisfaction with city services is similar in most areas of the City  Top priorities for residents were: infrastructure maintenance, code enforcement, & police services