This document discusses definitions of religion and whether Richard Dawkins can be considered anti-religious. It summarizes Kevin Schilbrack's definition of religion as involving belief in supernatural or superempirical realities. The author then proposes replacing "superempirical" with "superscientific" to address issues with Schilbrack's definition. After providing this definition, the author examines Dawkins' views to determine if he can fairly be characterized as anti-religious or if criticisms of him are justified.
This document discusses the concept of "religious atheism" - the idea that one can have a religious worldview and experience without believing in God. It notes that many prominent thinkers like Einstein considered themselves religious while also being atheists. It argues that religion is deeper than belief in God, involving a sense that objective value and meaning permeate reality, that nature and human life are awe-inspiring. Defining religion is difficult as it is an interpretive concept, but understanding what religion shares across traditions could improve communication between theists and atheists by emphasizing their common commitments over what divides them. The document aims to explore what account of religion would be most revealing in thinking about religious atheism.
- The document summarizes a talk given by John Lennox on whether science has disproven the existence of God.
- Lennox argues that science studies nature but does not prove or disprove the existence of a creator. Many prominent scientists throughout history were Christian believers.
- The real debate is between naturalism, which sees the universe as all that exists, versus theism, which posits an ultimate creator beyond the natural world. Science alone cannot prove either view.
Toward the end of the Renaissance, the modern method ofempir.docxturveycharlyn
Toward the end of the Renaissance, the modern method of
empirical science began to develop. The key players were
Nicholas Copernicus (1473-1543), Johannes Kepler (1571-
1630), and Galileo Galilei (1564-1642). Although it may
seem ironic now, each of these men believed in the Christian
God. They viewed science as studying the handiwork of an
almighty Creator and discerning His natural laws. Galileo
considered God to have written two “books”: the Bible and
nature (Hummel, p. 106).
Contrary to popular belief, the cause for the diversion
between Christianity and science originated not with the
Church but with the university professors who were threat-
ened by Galileo’s revolutionary ideas. These professors were
steeped in the Greek scientific method, which included
observation to a small extent, but mostly explained the
workings of nature through rational deduction from first
principles, or assumptions, an entire view of the universe had
been built up. Consequently, the professors embraced such
misconceptions as the sun having no imperfections, the moon
being a perfectly smooth sphere that shone with its own light,
and the earth alone having a moon since the earth was at the
center of the universe. Galileo’s recently invented telescope
quickly demonstrated the incorrectness of such assumptions
(Hummel, pp. 91-94).
Not willing to be thwarted by Galileo, the professors decided
to make the controversy religious rather than academic
(Hummel, p. 92). They argued that the heliocentric (sun-cen-
tered) view contradicted scripture (e.g., Psalm 104:22 says,
“The sun rises.” Therefore, the sun must revolve around sta-
tionary earth). In the face of what at that time appeared to be
a genuine contradiction between scripture and the heliocen-
tric theory, the theologians of the Roman Catholic Church
had no choice but to condemn Galileo’s views, because the
conflict had challenged the authority of the Church.
As a result of that controversy, the schism between reason
and faith had begun. There were now two apparently
irreconcilable sources of truth: the church and science.
Secularism
A Religion Profile from International Students, Inc.
1
Secularism: An Overview
Number of Adherents
Demographer Davit Barrett estimates that there are 150 million
atheists and 768 million nonreligious people in the world. The
combined total comes to more than 918 million people (Barrett).
Secularism Among the Nations
In more than 40 countries, atheists or nonreligious make up
more than 10 percent of the population (World Christian
Database). The following are just a few of those countries:
Austrailia, Britain, Canada, China, Cuba, Czech Republic,
France, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Japan, North Korea,
Mongolia, Netherlands, New Zealand, Russia, Sweden,
Uruguay and Vietnam.
Defining the Terms
An “atheist” is one who says there is sufficient evidence to
show that God does not exist. An “agnostic” is one who says
there is insufficient evidence to know wheth ...
Relationship Between Science And Religion
Science Vs Religion Research Paper
Science Vs Religion
Religion In Science Vs Religion
Science Vs Religion Research Paper
Research Paper On Science Vs Religion
Religion vs. Science
Evidence Based Science Vs Religion
Relationship Between Science And Religion
Essay on Science vs God
Religion vs. Science Essays
Religion vs. Science Essay
Science and Religion Essays
Science Vs Religion Research Paper
Religion vs. Science
The Nature Of Science Vs. Religion
Scientism Vs Religion Research Paper
Essay on Science vs. Religion
Cosmology: Science Vs Religion Essay
Module 7 AVP
PHI 110RS Module 7
The Pluralist Hypothesis: Hick’s Response to Religious Diversity
The Problem of Conflicting Truth-Claims
The fact is that there are lots of different religions in the world and these religions don’t all teach the same thing. According to Christians, for example, God is Trinity; he is made up of Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. And Jesus Christ is the Son of God. And as such, he is divine. Islam, on the other hand, teaches that, while Jesus was a great prophet of God, he was by no means divine in the sense that Allah is divine. Allah is one; there is no division of parts within him. He is most certainly not a Trinity.
Religions also differ when it comes to life after death. According to some Eastern religions, such as Buddhism and Hinduism, human beings a caught in vast system of birth and rebirth, and the great majority of human beings will be reincarnated into some new form after this present life. Islam and Christianity, on the other hand, teach that human beings will die only once, and after that, face judgment. There is no “second chance” to come back and try again.
What this fact of religious diversity entails is that, at most, only one religion can possibly be absolutely true. Perhaps no religion is absolutely and exclusively true, but at most, only one of them is.
Religious Pluralism
Religious pluralism responds to the problem of religious diversity by arguing that no one religion is absolutely true. At best, each religion is only partially true. But no one of them has a monopoly on the truth. No one of them gets all of the facts right about the world.
Yet, religious pluralism is not religious skepticism. Religious skepticism throws in the towel and concludes that since no one religion contains the absolute truth, all religion is bunk and should be rejected. Religious pluralism, on the other hand, is an earnestly religious response to the problem of conflicting truth-claims. Although no one religion is absolutely true, says pluralism, many religions are nonetheless good, beneficial, and imperfect interpretations of an undeniably real divine reality.
Hick’s Pluralistic Hypothesis
Hick’s pluralistic hypothesis is that the various different religions are distinct ways of experiencing the same ultimate divine reality. Hick calls this divine ultimate reality “the Real.”
Just as people often experience the same thing in different ways without contradicting each other, different religions experience the Real in different ways, without contradiction.
Interpretation of the Real as “Seeing-As”
To see how Hick’s hypothesis of the Real works, let us consider an analogy. Look at the image on the screen. What do you see?
Chances are that you see one of the following: either a duck or a rabbit. If you only see a duck, try looking at the image a little differently. The two long peninsulas that make up the duck’s bill can also be viewed instead as rabbit ears. So that rather than a duck facing toward the left, ...
Core ValuesExcellenceNo name University is an educational en.docxvoversbyobersby
Core Values
Excellence
No name University is an educational enterprise. All of us, individually and collectively, work hard to ensure that our students develop the character, learn the skills, and assimilate the knowledge essential to become morally responsible leaders. The success of our University depends upon a conscientious commitment to our mission, vision, and goals.
Community
No name University develops hospitable Christian learning communities everywhere we serve. We foster a spirit of belonging, unity, and interdependence based on mutual trust and respect to create socially responsible environments that challenge all of us to listen, to learn, to change, and to serve.
Respect
Animated in the spirit of Jesus Christ, we value all individuals’ unique talents, respect their dignity, and strive to foster their commitment to excellence in our work. Our community’s strength depends on the unity and diversity of our people, on the free exchange of ideas, and on learning, living, and working harmoniously.
Personal Development
No name University stresses the development of every person’s mind, spirit, and body for a balanced life. All members of the No name University community must demonstrate their commitment to personal development to help strengthen the character of our community.
Responsible Stewardship
Our Creator blesses us with an abundance of resources. We foster a spirit of service to employ our resources for University and community development. We must be resourceful. We must optimize and apply all of the resources of our community to fulfill no name University’s mission and goals.
Integrity
The commitment of no name University to excellence demands that its members live its mission and deliver on its promise. The faculty, staff, and students pledge to be honest, just, and consistent in word and deed.
SuMMARIZING THE OPTIONS
There was a time when it seemed that religion might just dis-
appear. Throughout the modern period secularism continued
to grow. It appeared that the religions of humankind would be
superseded by science and left behind as historical artifacts, like
Egyptian temples, the Greek gods, and many Christian churches
in Northern Europe today. Certainly the hope of a world with-
out religion continues to motivate some thinkers. Richard Daw-
kins’ ‘Beyond Belief ’ movement and advertising campaigns in
Britain and Canada have precisely this outcome as their goal.
And yet at present the outcome they strive for appears unlikely.
If anything, there has been a resurgence of religious commitment
in many cultures. Any decline in religion in Europe and North
America has been more than compensated for by the rapid
growth of Pentecostal and charismatic movements in churches
around the world. Even non-religious thinkers, such as Jürgen
Habermas, one of Germany’s leading philosophers, now speak
of moving – contrary to their and others’ expectations – into a
‘post-secular society.’1
Religion, then, it appears, is.
- There are differing views on the relationship between science and religion - exclusivism claims they are incompatible while accommodationism claims they can be compatible.
- Exclusivists make three claims: that religion supports science (proreligion thesis), science and religion necessarily conflict (conflict thesis), and religious beliefs are irrational (irrationalism thesis).
- Accommodationism acknowledges that science and religion do not always conflict and that it is sometimes rational to hold both religious and scientific beliefs.
- The development of beliefs is influenced more by heuristics like believing authorities than by objective consideration of facts. Religious traditions often accommodate new scientific findings over time.
- While science can disprove some specific religious claims, it
This document discusses the concept of "religious atheism" - the idea that one can have a religious worldview and experience without believing in God. It notes that many prominent thinkers like Einstein considered themselves religious while also being atheists. It argues that religion is deeper than belief in God, involving a sense that objective value and meaning permeate reality, that nature and human life are awe-inspiring. Defining religion is difficult as it is an interpretive concept, but understanding what religion shares across traditions could improve communication between theists and atheists by emphasizing their common commitments over what divides them. The document aims to explore what account of religion would be most revealing in thinking about religious atheism.
- The document summarizes a talk given by John Lennox on whether science has disproven the existence of God.
- Lennox argues that science studies nature but does not prove or disprove the existence of a creator. Many prominent scientists throughout history were Christian believers.
- The real debate is between naturalism, which sees the universe as all that exists, versus theism, which posits an ultimate creator beyond the natural world. Science alone cannot prove either view.
Toward the end of the Renaissance, the modern method ofempir.docxturveycharlyn
Toward the end of the Renaissance, the modern method of
empirical science began to develop. The key players were
Nicholas Copernicus (1473-1543), Johannes Kepler (1571-
1630), and Galileo Galilei (1564-1642). Although it may
seem ironic now, each of these men believed in the Christian
God. They viewed science as studying the handiwork of an
almighty Creator and discerning His natural laws. Galileo
considered God to have written two “books”: the Bible and
nature (Hummel, p. 106).
Contrary to popular belief, the cause for the diversion
between Christianity and science originated not with the
Church but with the university professors who were threat-
ened by Galileo’s revolutionary ideas. These professors were
steeped in the Greek scientific method, which included
observation to a small extent, but mostly explained the
workings of nature through rational deduction from first
principles, or assumptions, an entire view of the universe had
been built up. Consequently, the professors embraced such
misconceptions as the sun having no imperfections, the moon
being a perfectly smooth sphere that shone with its own light,
and the earth alone having a moon since the earth was at the
center of the universe. Galileo’s recently invented telescope
quickly demonstrated the incorrectness of such assumptions
(Hummel, pp. 91-94).
Not willing to be thwarted by Galileo, the professors decided
to make the controversy religious rather than academic
(Hummel, p. 92). They argued that the heliocentric (sun-cen-
tered) view contradicted scripture (e.g., Psalm 104:22 says,
“The sun rises.” Therefore, the sun must revolve around sta-
tionary earth). In the face of what at that time appeared to be
a genuine contradiction between scripture and the heliocen-
tric theory, the theologians of the Roman Catholic Church
had no choice but to condemn Galileo’s views, because the
conflict had challenged the authority of the Church.
As a result of that controversy, the schism between reason
and faith had begun. There were now two apparently
irreconcilable sources of truth: the church and science.
Secularism
A Religion Profile from International Students, Inc.
1
Secularism: An Overview
Number of Adherents
Demographer Davit Barrett estimates that there are 150 million
atheists and 768 million nonreligious people in the world. The
combined total comes to more than 918 million people (Barrett).
Secularism Among the Nations
In more than 40 countries, atheists or nonreligious make up
more than 10 percent of the population (World Christian
Database). The following are just a few of those countries:
Austrailia, Britain, Canada, China, Cuba, Czech Republic,
France, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Japan, North Korea,
Mongolia, Netherlands, New Zealand, Russia, Sweden,
Uruguay and Vietnam.
Defining the Terms
An “atheist” is one who says there is sufficient evidence to
show that God does not exist. An “agnostic” is one who says
there is insufficient evidence to know wheth ...
Relationship Between Science And Religion
Science Vs Religion Research Paper
Science Vs Religion
Religion In Science Vs Religion
Science Vs Religion Research Paper
Research Paper On Science Vs Religion
Religion vs. Science
Evidence Based Science Vs Religion
Relationship Between Science And Religion
Essay on Science vs God
Religion vs. Science Essays
Religion vs. Science Essay
Science and Religion Essays
Science Vs Religion Research Paper
Religion vs. Science
The Nature Of Science Vs. Religion
Scientism Vs Religion Research Paper
Essay on Science vs. Religion
Cosmology: Science Vs Religion Essay
Module 7 AVP
PHI 110RS Module 7
The Pluralist Hypothesis: Hick’s Response to Religious Diversity
The Problem of Conflicting Truth-Claims
The fact is that there are lots of different religions in the world and these religions don’t all teach the same thing. According to Christians, for example, God is Trinity; he is made up of Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. And Jesus Christ is the Son of God. And as such, he is divine. Islam, on the other hand, teaches that, while Jesus was a great prophet of God, he was by no means divine in the sense that Allah is divine. Allah is one; there is no division of parts within him. He is most certainly not a Trinity.
Religions also differ when it comes to life after death. According to some Eastern religions, such as Buddhism and Hinduism, human beings a caught in vast system of birth and rebirth, and the great majority of human beings will be reincarnated into some new form after this present life. Islam and Christianity, on the other hand, teach that human beings will die only once, and after that, face judgment. There is no “second chance” to come back and try again.
What this fact of religious diversity entails is that, at most, only one religion can possibly be absolutely true. Perhaps no religion is absolutely and exclusively true, but at most, only one of them is.
Religious Pluralism
Religious pluralism responds to the problem of religious diversity by arguing that no one religion is absolutely true. At best, each religion is only partially true. But no one of them has a monopoly on the truth. No one of them gets all of the facts right about the world.
Yet, religious pluralism is not religious skepticism. Religious skepticism throws in the towel and concludes that since no one religion contains the absolute truth, all religion is bunk and should be rejected. Religious pluralism, on the other hand, is an earnestly religious response to the problem of conflicting truth-claims. Although no one religion is absolutely true, says pluralism, many religions are nonetheless good, beneficial, and imperfect interpretations of an undeniably real divine reality.
Hick’s Pluralistic Hypothesis
Hick’s pluralistic hypothesis is that the various different religions are distinct ways of experiencing the same ultimate divine reality. Hick calls this divine ultimate reality “the Real.”
Just as people often experience the same thing in different ways without contradicting each other, different religions experience the Real in different ways, without contradiction.
Interpretation of the Real as “Seeing-As”
To see how Hick’s hypothesis of the Real works, let us consider an analogy. Look at the image on the screen. What do you see?
Chances are that you see one of the following: either a duck or a rabbit. If you only see a duck, try looking at the image a little differently. The two long peninsulas that make up the duck’s bill can also be viewed instead as rabbit ears. So that rather than a duck facing toward the left, ...
Core ValuesExcellenceNo name University is an educational en.docxvoversbyobersby
Core Values
Excellence
No name University is an educational enterprise. All of us, individually and collectively, work hard to ensure that our students develop the character, learn the skills, and assimilate the knowledge essential to become morally responsible leaders. The success of our University depends upon a conscientious commitment to our mission, vision, and goals.
Community
No name University develops hospitable Christian learning communities everywhere we serve. We foster a spirit of belonging, unity, and interdependence based on mutual trust and respect to create socially responsible environments that challenge all of us to listen, to learn, to change, and to serve.
Respect
Animated in the spirit of Jesus Christ, we value all individuals’ unique talents, respect their dignity, and strive to foster their commitment to excellence in our work. Our community’s strength depends on the unity and diversity of our people, on the free exchange of ideas, and on learning, living, and working harmoniously.
Personal Development
No name University stresses the development of every person’s mind, spirit, and body for a balanced life. All members of the No name University community must demonstrate their commitment to personal development to help strengthen the character of our community.
Responsible Stewardship
Our Creator blesses us with an abundance of resources. We foster a spirit of service to employ our resources for University and community development. We must be resourceful. We must optimize and apply all of the resources of our community to fulfill no name University’s mission and goals.
Integrity
The commitment of no name University to excellence demands that its members live its mission and deliver on its promise. The faculty, staff, and students pledge to be honest, just, and consistent in word and deed.
SuMMARIZING THE OPTIONS
There was a time when it seemed that religion might just dis-
appear. Throughout the modern period secularism continued
to grow. It appeared that the religions of humankind would be
superseded by science and left behind as historical artifacts, like
Egyptian temples, the Greek gods, and many Christian churches
in Northern Europe today. Certainly the hope of a world with-
out religion continues to motivate some thinkers. Richard Daw-
kins’ ‘Beyond Belief ’ movement and advertising campaigns in
Britain and Canada have precisely this outcome as their goal.
And yet at present the outcome they strive for appears unlikely.
If anything, there has been a resurgence of religious commitment
in many cultures. Any decline in religion in Europe and North
America has been more than compensated for by the rapid
growth of Pentecostal and charismatic movements in churches
around the world. Even non-religious thinkers, such as Jürgen
Habermas, one of Germany’s leading philosophers, now speak
of moving – contrary to their and others’ expectations – into a
‘post-secular society.’1
Religion, then, it appears, is.
- There are differing views on the relationship between science and religion - exclusivism claims they are incompatible while accommodationism claims they can be compatible.
- Exclusivists make three claims: that religion supports science (proreligion thesis), science and religion necessarily conflict (conflict thesis), and religious beliefs are irrational (irrationalism thesis).
- Accommodationism acknowledges that science and religion do not always conflict and that it is sometimes rational to hold both religious and scientific beliefs.
- The development of beliefs is influenced more by heuristics like believing authorities than by objective consideration of facts. Religious traditions often accommodate new scientific findings over time.
- While science can disprove some specific religious claims, it
Sample Thesis Topics For Psychology STARREDOLeslie Schulte
This document provides instructions for requesting writing assistance from HelpWriting.net. It outlines a 5-step process: 1) Create an account with a password and email. 2) Complete an order form with instructions, sources, and deadline. 3) Review writer bids and qualifications to select a writer. 4) Review the completed paper and authorize payment. 5) Request revisions until satisfied, with a refund option for plagiarized content.
Strathmore Writing 25 Cotton Stationery Paper Wove Finish IvorLeslie Schulte
The document outlines the steps involved in registering a new patient at a healthcare provider's office:
1) Perform an intake interview to gather preliminary data and check insurance eligibility
2) Schedule an appointment and obtain preauthorization if needed
3) Have the patient fill out a registration form to open their medical and billing records
4) Make copies of insurance cards and have patient sign release forms
5) Establish the patient's chart and enter their details into the practice's database
005 Esl How To Write An Essay Example Of WritingLeslie Schulte
The document discusses the causes and effects of poverty in the United States, identifying the top three causes as lack of education, unemployment, and the high cost of health insurance. It explains how these factors lead to poverty and discusses some statistics around poverty rates and education levels in Rhode Island. The document argues that Americans can overcome poverty by furthering their education to get higher paying jobs with benefits and access to affordable health insurance.
This document provides instructions for requesting an assignment writing service from HelpWriting.net in 5 steps:
1. Create an account with a password and email.
2. Complete a 10-minute order form providing instructions, sources, deadline and sample work.
3. Review bids from writers and choose one based on qualifications and reviews.
4. Review the completed paper and authorize payment or request revisions.
5. Request revisions to ensure satisfaction and receive a refund if plagiarized.
How To Write A Literature Review Outline What Is ALeslie Schulte
The document discusses Thomas Hobbes and John Locke's social contract theories. Both philosophers believed people are born free and equal, with the right to choose their government. Hobbes saw humans in a state of nature as constantly in competition, while Locke viewed it as more peaceful. They both agreed people consent to government for protection of basic rights like life, though they differed on how much power government should have.
Virginia Tech Application Essay Prompt 2012 - ProofrLeslie Schulte
The document provides instructions for using the HelpWriting.net service to have essays written. It outlines a 5-step process: 1) Create an account with a password and email. 2) Complete a 10-minute order form providing instructions, sources, and deadline. 3) Review bids from writers and choose one. 4) Review the completed paper and authorize payment. 5) Request revisions to ensure satisfaction, with a refund option for plagiarized work. The service aims to provide original, high-quality content to meet customer needs.
Introductory Paragraph Research Paper Introduction Sample - EXAMPLEPAPERSLeslie Schulte
The document provides instructions for requesting and completing an assignment writing request through the HelpWriting.net website. It outlines a 5-step process: 1) Create an account with a password and email. 2) Complete an order form with instructions, sources, and deadline. 3) Review bids from writers and select one. 4) Review the completed paper and authorize payment. 5) Request revisions until satisfied with the work. The document emphasizes that original, plagiarism-free work is guaranteed, with refunds offered for plagiarized content.
College Life Essay - College Homework Help And Online Tutoring.Leslie Schulte
The document discusses conformity and the different types of conformity according to social psychologist Leon Mann and researcher Harold Kelman. It explains that conformity means yielding to group pressures and maintaining cognitive balance by conforming to stereotypes and expectations. Kelman identified three types of conformity: compliance, where one goes along publicly but disagrees privately; internalization, where one accepts the group's beliefs as their own; and identification, where one conforms for acceptance and approval. The document also discusses Solomon Asch's line experiment which showed that subjects' responses converged towards the average of the group to conform, even when the group was objectively wrong.
The document provides instructions for submitting an assignment request to the website HelpWriting.net. It outlines a 5-step process: 1) Create an account with an email and password. 2) Complete a 10-minute order form providing instructions, sources, and deadline. 3) Review bids from writers and select one. 4) Review the completed paper and authorize payment if satisfied. 5) Request revisions to ensure satisfaction, with a full refund option for plagiarized work. The process aims to fully meet customer needs with original, high-quality content.
How To Start An Essay About Yourself ExamplesLeslie Schulte
Puck is responsible for causing all the problems and confusion between the lovers in A Midsummer Night's Dream. He puts a magical flower on the wrong person, which leads Lysander to fall in love with Helena instead of Hermia. While Puck finds the mortals' behavior amusing, he does not show any remorse for his mistakes and their consequences. The essay argues that Puck interferes greatly in the lives of the characters and is the root cause of the disagreements through his actions and failure to take responsibility.
10 Ways To Make Name W. Online assignment writing service.Leslie Schulte
Maya Angelou's eulogy for Coretta Scott King uses rhetorical devices to memorialize and celebrate her. Angelou employs anaphora, or repetitive phrases at the beginning of sentences, to emphasize Mrs. King's strength and perseverance. She also shares personal anecdotes about their friendship to humanize Mrs. King and connect with the audience on an emotional level. Angelou's choice of rich, connotative language portrays Mrs. King as a symbol of courage and hope who endured immense struggles but remained determined in advancing civil rights.
Love Letter Template Design Free - Letter Daily ReferenLeslie Schulte
The document provides instructions for creating different types of culture media and solutions for microbiology experiments. It describes how to make TYE ampicillin glucose agar plates, M9 minimal medium glucose plates, 2xTY medium, kanamycin solution, ampicillin solution, NHS biotin solution, and a glycine solution. The instructions include the specific amounts of ingredients needed, how to dissolve and filter them, and storage conditions. The purpose is to develop various culture media and solutions that can be used for microbiology experiments involving bacteria growth and selection.
Sample Philosophy Papers Free Will DeterminismLeslie Schulte
This document discusses women's roles during times of war throughout history and how Virginia Woolf addressed this topic in her work Three Guineas. Traditionally, women have been separated from the front lines of war and seen as fulfilling domestic roles like motherhood and homemaking instead of combat. However, some women have taken on non-traditional roles in conflicts by nursing soldiers, spying, or disguising themselves as men to fight. Woolf's Three Guineas examined how society tells women they are not made for war but rather household tasks, and how women sacrifice for wars just as men do by offering up family members who fight.
1. Mauro conducted research using a cross-country data set from 1971-1983 to evaluate the causes of corruption worldwide.
2. The research used corruption indices from the Business International Corporation that rated conditions in over 70 countries. Higher index values corresponded to better institutional quality.
3. Nine indices were identified as the best determinants of institutional efficiency, including political stability, legal systems, red tape, and corruption. These were grouped into indices of bureaucratic efficiency and political stability.
021 Essay Introduction Paragraph Example Argumentative Format ...Leslie Schulte
The passage discusses economics of information in developed countries. It notes that developed countries are often defined based on criteria like income per capita and level of industrialization. The passage also discusses some key characteristics of information goods, including that information can be shared simultaneously among multiple consumers and is difficult to return. It explains how the economics of information differs from other forms of economics due to these unique properties of information. Finally, it provides the example of how information managers must make economic decisions by choosing how to allocate fixed budgets among competing alternatives.
Different Types Of Essay Writing Examples. ExampleLeslie Schulte
The document provides instructions for students seeking writing help from HelpWriting.net. It outlines a 5-step process: 1) Create an account; 2) Submit a request with instructions and deadline; 3) Review bids from writers and select one; 4) Review the completed paper and authorize payment; 5) Request revisions until satisfied. It emphasizes HelpWriting.net's commitment to original, high-quality work and full refunds for plagiarized content.
My First College Experience Essay . Online assignment writing service.Leslie Schulte
The document provides instructions for requesting assistance with an assignment from the website HelpWriting.net. It outlines a 5-step process: 1) Create an account with a password and email. 2) Complete an order form with instructions, sources, and deadline. 3) Review bids from writers and select one. 4) Review the completed paper and authorize payment. 5) Request revisions until satisfied, with a refund option for plagiarism. The purpose is to outline the simple process for students to get high-quality original work through the website.
Write My Persuasive Speech 75 Persuasive Speech TopLeslie Schulte
The document discusses how to create an account and submit a request on the HelpWriting.net website to have a paper written. It explains that the site uses a bidding system where writers can bid on requests, and the client can choose a writer based on qualifications, reviews, and price. The document emphasizes that the site aims to ensure client satisfaction through revisions and refunds if work is plagiarized.
The document provides instructions for writing an essay using the self-writing method on the website HelpWriting.net. It outlines a 5-step process: 1) Create an account with an email and password. 2) Complete a 10-minute order form providing instructions, sources, and deadline. 3) Review writer bids and choose one based on qualifications. 4) Review the completed paper and authorize payment if satisfied. 5) Request revisions to ensure satisfaction, and the company guarantees original, high-quality work with refunds for plagiarism.
The document provides instructions for creating an account and submitting assignment requests on the HelpWriting.net website. It involves a 5-step process: 1) Create an account with an email and password. 2) Complete a form with assignment details, sources, and deadline. 3) Review bids from writers and choose one. 4) Review the completed paper and authorize payment. 5) Request revisions to ensure satisfaction, and the company offers refunds for plagiarized work.
A Visual Guide to 1 Samuel | A Tale of Two HeartsSteve Thomason
These slides walk through the story of 1 Samuel. Samuel is the last judge of Israel. The people reject God and want a king. Saul is anointed as the first king, but he is not a good king. David, the shepherd boy is anointed and Saul is envious of him. David shows honor while Saul continues to self destruct.
Level 3 NCEA - NZ: A Nation In the Making 1872 - 1900 SML.pptHenry Hollis
The History of NZ 1870-1900.
Making of a Nation.
From the NZ Wars to Liberals,
Richard Seddon, George Grey,
Social Laboratory, New Zealand,
Confiscations, Kotahitanga, Kingitanga, Parliament, Suffrage, Repudiation, Economic Change, Agriculture, Gold Mining, Timber, Flax, Sheep, Dairying,
Sample Thesis Topics For Psychology STARREDOLeslie Schulte
This document provides instructions for requesting writing assistance from HelpWriting.net. It outlines a 5-step process: 1) Create an account with a password and email. 2) Complete an order form with instructions, sources, and deadline. 3) Review writer bids and qualifications to select a writer. 4) Review the completed paper and authorize payment. 5) Request revisions until satisfied, with a refund option for plagiarized content.
Strathmore Writing 25 Cotton Stationery Paper Wove Finish IvorLeslie Schulte
The document outlines the steps involved in registering a new patient at a healthcare provider's office:
1) Perform an intake interview to gather preliminary data and check insurance eligibility
2) Schedule an appointment and obtain preauthorization if needed
3) Have the patient fill out a registration form to open their medical and billing records
4) Make copies of insurance cards and have patient sign release forms
5) Establish the patient's chart and enter their details into the practice's database
005 Esl How To Write An Essay Example Of WritingLeslie Schulte
The document discusses the causes and effects of poverty in the United States, identifying the top three causes as lack of education, unemployment, and the high cost of health insurance. It explains how these factors lead to poverty and discusses some statistics around poverty rates and education levels in Rhode Island. The document argues that Americans can overcome poverty by furthering their education to get higher paying jobs with benefits and access to affordable health insurance.
This document provides instructions for requesting an assignment writing service from HelpWriting.net in 5 steps:
1. Create an account with a password and email.
2. Complete a 10-minute order form providing instructions, sources, deadline and sample work.
3. Review bids from writers and choose one based on qualifications and reviews.
4. Review the completed paper and authorize payment or request revisions.
5. Request revisions to ensure satisfaction and receive a refund if plagiarized.
How To Write A Literature Review Outline What Is ALeslie Schulte
The document discusses Thomas Hobbes and John Locke's social contract theories. Both philosophers believed people are born free and equal, with the right to choose their government. Hobbes saw humans in a state of nature as constantly in competition, while Locke viewed it as more peaceful. They both agreed people consent to government for protection of basic rights like life, though they differed on how much power government should have.
Virginia Tech Application Essay Prompt 2012 - ProofrLeslie Schulte
The document provides instructions for using the HelpWriting.net service to have essays written. It outlines a 5-step process: 1) Create an account with a password and email. 2) Complete a 10-minute order form providing instructions, sources, and deadline. 3) Review bids from writers and choose one. 4) Review the completed paper and authorize payment. 5) Request revisions to ensure satisfaction, with a refund option for plagiarized work. The service aims to provide original, high-quality content to meet customer needs.
Introductory Paragraph Research Paper Introduction Sample - EXAMPLEPAPERSLeslie Schulte
The document provides instructions for requesting and completing an assignment writing request through the HelpWriting.net website. It outlines a 5-step process: 1) Create an account with a password and email. 2) Complete an order form with instructions, sources, and deadline. 3) Review bids from writers and select one. 4) Review the completed paper and authorize payment. 5) Request revisions until satisfied with the work. The document emphasizes that original, plagiarism-free work is guaranteed, with refunds offered for plagiarized content.
College Life Essay - College Homework Help And Online Tutoring.Leslie Schulte
The document discusses conformity and the different types of conformity according to social psychologist Leon Mann and researcher Harold Kelman. It explains that conformity means yielding to group pressures and maintaining cognitive balance by conforming to stereotypes and expectations. Kelman identified three types of conformity: compliance, where one goes along publicly but disagrees privately; internalization, where one accepts the group's beliefs as their own; and identification, where one conforms for acceptance and approval. The document also discusses Solomon Asch's line experiment which showed that subjects' responses converged towards the average of the group to conform, even when the group was objectively wrong.
The document provides instructions for submitting an assignment request to the website HelpWriting.net. It outlines a 5-step process: 1) Create an account with an email and password. 2) Complete a 10-minute order form providing instructions, sources, and deadline. 3) Review bids from writers and select one. 4) Review the completed paper and authorize payment if satisfied. 5) Request revisions to ensure satisfaction, with a full refund option for plagiarized work. The process aims to fully meet customer needs with original, high-quality content.
How To Start An Essay About Yourself ExamplesLeslie Schulte
Puck is responsible for causing all the problems and confusion between the lovers in A Midsummer Night's Dream. He puts a magical flower on the wrong person, which leads Lysander to fall in love with Helena instead of Hermia. While Puck finds the mortals' behavior amusing, he does not show any remorse for his mistakes and their consequences. The essay argues that Puck interferes greatly in the lives of the characters and is the root cause of the disagreements through his actions and failure to take responsibility.
10 Ways To Make Name W. Online assignment writing service.Leslie Schulte
Maya Angelou's eulogy for Coretta Scott King uses rhetorical devices to memorialize and celebrate her. Angelou employs anaphora, or repetitive phrases at the beginning of sentences, to emphasize Mrs. King's strength and perseverance. She also shares personal anecdotes about their friendship to humanize Mrs. King and connect with the audience on an emotional level. Angelou's choice of rich, connotative language portrays Mrs. King as a symbol of courage and hope who endured immense struggles but remained determined in advancing civil rights.
Love Letter Template Design Free - Letter Daily ReferenLeslie Schulte
The document provides instructions for creating different types of culture media and solutions for microbiology experiments. It describes how to make TYE ampicillin glucose agar plates, M9 minimal medium glucose plates, 2xTY medium, kanamycin solution, ampicillin solution, NHS biotin solution, and a glycine solution. The instructions include the specific amounts of ingredients needed, how to dissolve and filter them, and storage conditions. The purpose is to develop various culture media and solutions that can be used for microbiology experiments involving bacteria growth and selection.
Sample Philosophy Papers Free Will DeterminismLeslie Schulte
This document discusses women's roles during times of war throughout history and how Virginia Woolf addressed this topic in her work Three Guineas. Traditionally, women have been separated from the front lines of war and seen as fulfilling domestic roles like motherhood and homemaking instead of combat. However, some women have taken on non-traditional roles in conflicts by nursing soldiers, spying, or disguising themselves as men to fight. Woolf's Three Guineas examined how society tells women they are not made for war but rather household tasks, and how women sacrifice for wars just as men do by offering up family members who fight.
1. Mauro conducted research using a cross-country data set from 1971-1983 to evaluate the causes of corruption worldwide.
2. The research used corruption indices from the Business International Corporation that rated conditions in over 70 countries. Higher index values corresponded to better institutional quality.
3. Nine indices were identified as the best determinants of institutional efficiency, including political stability, legal systems, red tape, and corruption. These were grouped into indices of bureaucratic efficiency and political stability.
021 Essay Introduction Paragraph Example Argumentative Format ...Leslie Schulte
The passage discusses economics of information in developed countries. It notes that developed countries are often defined based on criteria like income per capita and level of industrialization. The passage also discusses some key characteristics of information goods, including that information can be shared simultaneously among multiple consumers and is difficult to return. It explains how the economics of information differs from other forms of economics due to these unique properties of information. Finally, it provides the example of how information managers must make economic decisions by choosing how to allocate fixed budgets among competing alternatives.
Different Types Of Essay Writing Examples. ExampleLeslie Schulte
The document provides instructions for students seeking writing help from HelpWriting.net. It outlines a 5-step process: 1) Create an account; 2) Submit a request with instructions and deadline; 3) Review bids from writers and select one; 4) Review the completed paper and authorize payment; 5) Request revisions until satisfied. It emphasizes HelpWriting.net's commitment to original, high-quality work and full refunds for plagiarized content.
My First College Experience Essay . Online assignment writing service.Leslie Schulte
The document provides instructions for requesting assistance with an assignment from the website HelpWriting.net. It outlines a 5-step process: 1) Create an account with a password and email. 2) Complete an order form with instructions, sources, and deadline. 3) Review bids from writers and select one. 4) Review the completed paper and authorize payment. 5) Request revisions until satisfied, with a refund option for plagiarism. The purpose is to outline the simple process for students to get high-quality original work through the website.
Write My Persuasive Speech 75 Persuasive Speech TopLeslie Schulte
The document discusses how to create an account and submit a request on the HelpWriting.net website to have a paper written. It explains that the site uses a bidding system where writers can bid on requests, and the client can choose a writer based on qualifications, reviews, and price. The document emphasizes that the site aims to ensure client satisfaction through revisions and refunds if work is plagiarized.
The document provides instructions for writing an essay using the self-writing method on the website HelpWriting.net. It outlines a 5-step process: 1) Create an account with an email and password. 2) Complete a 10-minute order form providing instructions, sources, and deadline. 3) Review writer bids and choose one based on qualifications. 4) Review the completed paper and authorize payment if satisfied. 5) Request revisions to ensure satisfaction, and the company guarantees original, high-quality work with refunds for plagiarism.
The document provides instructions for creating an account and submitting assignment requests on the HelpWriting.net website. It involves a 5-step process: 1) Create an account with an email and password. 2) Complete a form with assignment details, sources, and deadline. 3) Review bids from writers and choose one. 4) Review the completed paper and authorize payment. 5) Request revisions to ensure satisfaction, and the company offers refunds for plagiarized work.
A Visual Guide to 1 Samuel | A Tale of Two HeartsSteve Thomason
These slides walk through the story of 1 Samuel. Samuel is the last judge of Israel. The people reject God and want a king. Saul is anointed as the first king, but he is not a good king. David, the shepherd boy is anointed and Saul is envious of him. David shows honor while Saul continues to self destruct.
Level 3 NCEA - NZ: A Nation In the Making 1872 - 1900 SML.pptHenry Hollis
The History of NZ 1870-1900.
Making of a Nation.
From the NZ Wars to Liberals,
Richard Seddon, George Grey,
Social Laboratory, New Zealand,
Confiscations, Kotahitanga, Kingitanga, Parliament, Suffrage, Repudiation, Economic Change, Agriculture, Gold Mining, Timber, Flax, Sheep, Dairying,
Temple of Asclepius in Thrace. Excavation resultsKrassimira Luka
The temple and the sanctuary around were dedicated to Asklepios Zmidrenus. This name has been known since 1875 when an inscription dedicated to him was discovered in Rome. The inscription is dated in 227 AD and was left by soldiers originating from the city of Philippopolis (modern Plovdiv).
Andreas Schleicher presents PISA 2022 Volume III - Creative Thinking - 18 Jun...EduSkills OECD
Andreas Schleicher, Director of Education and Skills at the OECD presents at the launch of PISA 2022 Volume III - Creative Minds, Creative Schools on 18 June 2024.
Leveraging Generative AI to Drive Nonprofit InnovationTechSoup
In this webinar, participants learned how to utilize Generative AI to streamline operations and elevate member engagement. Amazon Web Service experts provided a customer specific use cases and dived into low/no-code tools that are quick and easy to deploy through Amazon Web Service (AWS.)
Walmart Business+ and Spark Good for Nonprofits.pdfTechSoup
"Learn about all the ways Walmart supports nonprofit organizations.
You will hear from Liz Willett, the Head of Nonprofits, and hear about what Walmart is doing to help nonprofits, including Walmart Business and Spark Good. Walmart Business+ is a new offer for nonprofits that offers discounts and also streamlines nonprofits order and expense tracking, saving time and money.
The webinar may also give some examples on how nonprofits can best leverage Walmart Business+.
The event will cover the following::
Walmart Business + (https://business.walmart.com/plus) is a new shopping experience for nonprofits, schools, and local business customers that connects an exclusive online shopping experience to stores. Benefits include free delivery and shipping, a 'Spend Analytics” feature, special discounts, deals and tax-exempt shopping.
Special TechSoup offer for a free 180 days membership, and up to $150 in discounts on eligible orders.
Spark Good (walmart.com/sparkgood) is a charitable platform that enables nonprofits to receive donations directly from customers and associates.
Answers about how you can do more with Walmart!"
What is Digital Literacy? A guest blog from Andy McLaughlin, University of Ab...
A Superscientific Definition Of Religion And A Clarification Of Richard Dawkins New Atheism
1. Literature & Aesthetics 24 (2) December 2014 109
A Superscientific Definition of
‘Religion’ and a Clarification of Richard
Dawkins’ New Atheism
Raphael Lataster
Introduction
In discussions with colleagues and through reading various articles –
scholarly and popular, by believers and non-believers – it is clear that
Richard Dawkins, and New Atheism in general, is perceived as being anti-
religious. For this to be a fair charge, critics must first determine what it is
to be anti-religious. Furthermore, the term ‘religion’ must necessarily be
defined. No one is better placed to define, and understand the complexities
and challenges in attempting to define, such a controversial and often
emotive term, than the Religious Studies scholar. Suspecting that Dawkins’
views have been misunderstood and misrepresented, on this and other
issues, I felt it pertinent to attempt to clarify what it is that Dawkins
actually espouses, and to determine if this, and related criticisms, are
warranted.
During Richard Dawkins’ visit to Australia in December 2014, I
was fortunate to be given the opportunity to interview him, with the
appropriately naturalistic aesthetic of the Blue Mountains surrounding us.1
After forging yet another definition of ‘religion’, I use excerpts from our
discussions, as well as Dawkins’ writings, to contest the notion that
Dawkins is anti-religious, and to further show that associated criticisms –
of himself, and the so called New Atheism – are unjustified or unnecessary.
Raphael Lataster is a PhD candidate and tutor in the Department of Studies in Religion at
the University of Sydney.
1
Thanks are due to Michael and Robyn, for graciously arranging our interview, particularly
when Dawkins had refused all televised and other interviews that deviated from his official
tour, and also to Sarah, Connor, and also Chris Sharples, for their assistance on the day. I
extend special thanks to Renee Lockwood, who kindly offered constructive criticisms, and
Richard Dawkins, who agreed to be interviewed and later provided further clarifications.
2. ‘Religion’ and Richard Dawkins
Literature & Aesthetics 24 (2) December 2014
110
What is Religion?
It is a crucial question, particularly to Religious Studies scholars, that has
never been resolved, and probably never will be. Purely substantive or
essentialist definitions might satisfy some adherents of the ‘Western’
religions, but naively ignore the importance of orthopraxy. However,
purely functional definitions, such as Paul Tillich’s,2
seem to render the
term almost useless, in allowing any mundane practice to be labelled
‘religious’. Indeed, such a definition would immediately refute the charge
that Dawkins is anti-religious, as he would easily – and eagerly, by some
critics and/or Religious Studies scholars3
– be found to be religious himself.
Purely functional definitions also relegate the importance of orthodoxy, of
beliefs, which often greatly affect certain pragmatic aspects of religion. It is
worrying that so many scholars of religion seem eager to discount the role
of beliefs in shaping the pragmatic aspects of adherents’ practices. For
example, the Baptist who willingly lets another submerge them in water
really does believe that this is what God wants for/from them. The
Mahayana Buddhist who shuns material wealth really does believe in
reincarnation. Logic dictates that a dithetic or mixed definition might be
ideal, which is the path chosen by analytic philosopher of religion Kevin
Schilbrack.
He notes that, in this way, atheistic Buddhism – the litmus test for
all good definitions of religion – need not be excluded, as, despite the lack
of belief in god/s, it does entail peculiar beliefs about how the world
works.4
Before arriving at his own definition, Schilbrack handily considers
earlier attempts to define religion; one is the Augustinian attempt to define
religion as “the reality of the Christian God”; another is Edward Herbert’s
attempt to stretch the definition to include the “supreme deity” of non-
Christians; there is also the more inclusive “belief in Spiritual Beings”, as
2
See Paul Tillich, Dynamics of Faith (New York: Harper & Row, 1957).
3
For example, see Cale Hubble, ‘The Sacred Things of Contemporary Anglophone
Atheism: Celebrities, Books and Values’, International Journal for the Study of New
Religions, vol. 4, no. 1 (2013), pp. 81-112.
4
Kevin Schilbrack, Philosophy and the Study of Religions: A Manifesto (Malden, MA:
Wiley-Blackwell, 2014), p. 128.
3. ‘Religion’ and Richard Dawkins
Literature & Aesthetics 24 (2) December 2014 111
championed by Edward Tylor.5
Seeking to make such a definition even
broader, Schilbrack seeks to include beliefs in “religious realities that are
not theistic” and “nonpersonlike religious forces”, which leads him to a
definition that concerns “a level of reality beyond the observable world
known to science”.6
Seeking to avoid the highly problematic term ‘supernatural’, which
– among other things – assumes dualism (which excludes pantheists and
other monists, who could well see their ‘god’ as ‘natural’), Schilbrack
settles on the involvement of the ‘superempirical’.7
Seemingly influenced
by the work of William James and Christian Smith, Schilbrack defines
religion as “forms of life predicated upon the reality of the
superempirical”. 8
This is certainly a very useful definition that
inadvertently incorporates what most laypeople consider religion to be, and,
satisfying ‘alternatives’ and critical scholars alike, includes the likes of
Buddhism and Daoism. It also allows scholars to hypothesise about
secularisation (which is essentially impossible with a purely functional
definition of religion), and further avoids the futility of labelling many
ordinary tasks as religious; as Martin Riesebrodt earlier observed, if soccer
is seen as religious and Buddhism is not, ‘something has obviously gone
wrong’.9
However, this definition is not without its problems. For example,
this sort of religion relies purely on faith, and can thus be seen as irrational.
As Schilbrack says, studying religion may be an attempt to “make sense out
of nonsense”.10
He attempts to defend his definition and the study of this
sort of religion against the empiricist rejection, that religion is cognitively
meaningless on account of its relying on the superempirical, by appealing
to the possibility of non-empirical evaluations and the fact that many other
5
Schilbrack, Philosophy and the Study of Religions, pp. 129-132. Regarding the
involvement of ‘spiritual beings’, cf. Spiro’s preference for the involvement of ‘superhuman
beings’, in Melford E. Spiro, ‘Religion: Problems of Definition and Explanation’, in
Anthropological Approaches to the Study of Religion, ed. Michael Banton (London:
Tavistock Publications, 1966), pp. 85-126.
6
Schilbrack, Philosophy and the Study of Religions, p. 133.
7
Schilbrack, Philosophy and the Study of Religions, p. 134.
8
Schilbrack, Philosophy and the Study of Religions, pp. 135-136, 145-146.
9
Schilbrack, Philosophy and the Study of Religions, pp. 139-141.
10
Schilbrack, Philosophy and the Study of Religions, p. 153.
4. ‘Religion’ and Richard Dawkins
Literature & Aesthetics 24 (2) December 2014
112
disciplines employ non-empirical approaches.11
My additional defence of
these challenges revolves around the fact that many religious claims, while
ultimately appealing to superempirical realities, are actually empirical
(though the link may be unprovable), and can actually be judged as such.
Consider an argument that God created the universe 6,000 years
ago. This contains an empirical claim; the proper evaluation of which
effectively refutes the empirical claim regarding the universe’s age and the
overall superempirical argument that God created a universe that is now
only 6,000 years old. The latter work would undoubtedly be meritorious,
particularly in countries where sound science education is under attack.12
Whilst overlooking the fact that many adherents do make empirical claims,
useful as it is, Schilbrack’s definition also has the air of naturalistic
assumption about it, and could fail if one of the examined religions can be
observed as being ‘true’. If this were to occur, then it would strangely cease
to be a ‘religion’. This may not be considered critical to secular scholars,
but is not inclusive of those who do hold religious beliefs, and could, in
principle, be crucial in future. If God were to reveal herself to our senses in
the near future, as has been claimed throughout history, then Schilbrack’s
definition falls flat.
However, I believe that this definition can be improved by simply
replacing the term ‘superempirical’ with ‘superscientific’.13
In this altered
definition, it is acknowledged that, while current scientific knowledge does
not confirm the existence of gods/God/divine forces, such things might
actually exist, and may or may not be confirmed in future. This definition
thus does not unjustly rule out the possibility that what is currently
11
Schilbrack, Philosophy and the Study of Religions, pp. 192-193.
12
For some resources on the creationism in schools debate, see Marjorie George, ‘And Then
God Created Kansas? The Evolution/Creationism Debate in America’s Public Schools’,
University of Pennsylvania Law Review, vol. 149, no. 3 (2001), pp. 843-872 and Robert T.
Pennock, ‘Should Creationism be Taught in the Public Schools?’, Science & Education, vol.
11, no. 2 (2002), pp. 111-133.
13
Other scholars agree that while the term ‘superempirical’ is useful, it is still problematic,
such as how it seems to ignore that many religious adherents make empirical claims. See
James McLachlan, ‘Kevin Schilbrack on Defining Religion and the Field of the Study of
Religions’, Sophia, vol. 53, no. 3 (2014), pp. 379-382. Schilbrack responded to this,
unconvincingly I feel (such as by denying that certain religious claims are empirical, which
seems far-fetched), and indicated that perhaps another scholar will find “better solutions to
this problem”, which is precisely what I hoped to achieve. See Kevin Schilbrack, ‘The
Future of Philosophy of Religion’, Sophia, vol. 53, no. 3 (2014), pp. 383-388.
5. ‘Religion’ and Richard Dawkins
Literature & Aesthetics 24 (2) December 2014 113
considered a ‘religion’ might be ‘true’, though it would still entail a
different classification if it were. And while the former definition assumes
that all elements of religion are beyond our senses, this altered definition
allows that they might not be. This superior definition recognises that the
substantive aspects of religion can indeed be empirical, and can indeed be,
in principle, correct.14
Religion is a form of life predicated upon the reality
of the superscientific. While a little more advantageous, my definition is
still not without its problems. It still entails that, if scientifically proven to
be veridical, a religion is no longer a religion. This issue for both
definitions may be less important for many critical scholars who find
notions of truth in the examination of religions to be beside the point, but it
cannot be denied that a large proportion of believers do place great
importance on religious claims to truth.15
Both Schilbrack’s definition and mine own also allows not only for
classification but the evaluation of various religious traditions, which can
no longer be seen as anathema to critical scholars of religion. The focus on
science makes it unavoidable that some scholars will invoke social
scientific evidence to deal with questions about which religions are more
likely to generate and disseminate ideas that result in certain pragmatic
outcomes. For example, “Do pantheistic religions foster a more green and
sustainable culture?” And, “Do monotheistic/theistic faiths encourage
religious violence?”16
It also allows us to ‘rank’ religions based on the
extent to which they are superscientific. For example, again referring to the
great differences between classical theism and pantheism/monism, and
appealing to the natural sciences, “Would the idea of ‘supernatural’ beings
or the idea of a conscious/divine universe be more in accordance with
current scientific evidence?”
14
This appears to refute the oft-made charge against me that somehow my own work, which
questions the historicity of Jesus and refutes the philosophical arguments for God’s
existence, is anti-religious.
15
Or even scholars in general, especially scientists, who might see a ‘true religion’ as just
being factual information about the world. For example, that a molecule of water contains
three atoms is not a religion. Perhaps it is unavoidable, at least to some extent, that a good
definition of religion assumes that it is ‘not true’. It might be true, but then, when
demonstrated as such, it is no longer a religion.
16
For a treatment of religious violence, see Hector Avalos, Fighting Words: The Origins of
Religious Violence (Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books, 2005).
6. ‘Religion’ and Richard Dawkins
Literature & Aesthetics 24 (2) December 2014
114
While certainly more inclusive, and retaining the benefits of
Schilbrack’s definition, an objection could arise, ironically appealing to my
own example about the Earth’s age, that some religions actually do, at
present, make scientific claims. That is correct, but my definition relies on
sound science, not mere claims and pseudoscience. Even many religious
adherents would admit that science has certainly not yet validated the
claims made by their holy texts, and their overeager brethren.17
Such
believers – and also secularists – might even try to argue that religion need
not be validated by scientific methods, and perhaps that religion and
science are non-overlapping magisteria,18
which would lend support to my
definition. Interestingly, while my definition is more inclusive and
respectful of religious beliefs than is Schilbrack’s, it still entails that being
‘anti-religious’ to some extent is certainly no crime. Now equipped with
my own definition of religion, and also many others’, we can try to
ascertain if Richard Dawkins is anti-religious, to what extent he is anti-
religious, and, perhaps, whether his anti-religion is justifiable and even
beneficial.
Dawkins’ Position and Mischaracterisations
While it may be expected for religious adherents – especially those among
lay audiences – to perceive Richard Dawkins as being anti-religious, this is
also a perception among scholars; and secular scholars at that. For example,
sociologist Elaine Ecklund indicates that Dawkins considers himself and
his scientific colleagues to be generally “anti-religion”,19
while Dawkins’
fellow scientist, Peter Higgs, also an atheist,20
criticises Dawkins, declaring
that “What Dawkins does too often is to concentrate his attack on
17
An exemplar would be Bishop Spong, who has written much on such topics. For but one
example of his liberal work, see John Shelby Spong, Why Christianity Must Change or Die:
A Bishop Speaks to Believers in Exile (New York: HarperCollins, 1999).
18
Cf. Stephen Jay Gould, Rocks of Ages: Science and Religion in the Fullness of Life (New
York: Ballantine Books, 1999).
19
Elaine Howard Ecklund, ‘Religion and Spirituality Among Scientists’, Contexts, vol. 7,
no. 1 (2008), p. 12.
20
In fact, Higgs has expressed his dismay that the Higgs boson is often given the moniker,
the ‘God particle’, as he is an atheist. See The Telegraph. ‘Prof Peter Higgs: Atheist scientist
admits he doesn’t believe in ‘god particle’’, accessed 24/02/2015,
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/science/science-news/9978226/Prof-Peter-Higgs-Atheist-
scientist-admits-he-doesnt-believe-in-god-particle.html.
7. ‘Religion’ and Richard Dawkins
Literature & Aesthetics 24 (2) December 2014 115
fundamentalists. But there are many believers who are just not
fundamentalists”.21
Higgs inadvertently brings up an interesting point that
perhaps Dawkins is not as anti-religious as is commonly perceived, which
we shall later address. But there are more examples. Dawkins has no
shortage of critics, even amongst his fellow atheistic scholars.
John Gray, a secular philosopher, characterises Dawkins as anti-
religious, irrelevantly refers to his seeming lack of humour,22
and takes
issue with his character, such as when he declares that “Dawkins displays
no interest in the cultures of the African countries where he lived as a
boy”.23
Gray also objects to Dawkins attacking literalist forms of religion,
bizarrely supposing that this is a relatively new development in religion.
Even if the latter is correct, that realisation should seemingly lead to
approbation from the secular intelligentsia and liberal believers alike, rather
than scorn and derision. There is surely nothing more offensive to the
critical scholar of religion than ardent literalism. Like many other secular
critics of Dawkins, including some of my colleagues in Religious Studies
departments, Gray objects to Dawkins’ public persona, calling him a
“comic figure”. Placing these tangential issues aside, Dawkins does himself
no favours here. I put the question about his perceived anti-religiousness to
him, directly:
I think I would think of myself as anti-religious, yes. I think that Christopher
Hitchens would be anti-religious for political reasons, and I would too, but
for me that’s overshadowed by scientific reasons. I am passionately
interested in the truth.24
21
The Guardian. ‘Peter Higgs criticises Richard Dawkins over anti-religious
‘fundamentalism’’, accessed 24/02/2015,
http://www.theguardian.com/science/2012/dec/26/peter-higgs-richard-dawkins-
fundamentalism.
22
Many of Dawkins’ supporters would disagree as evidenced by the raucous laughter
generated by his comments on the usefulness of science: “If you base medicine on science,
you cure people; if you base the design of planes on science, they fly; if you base the design
of rockets on science, they reach the moon. It works, bitches.” See Think Week Oxford. ‘In
Conversation with Richard Dawkins - Hosted by Stephen Law’, accessed 24/02/2015,
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zvkbiElAOqU.
23
The New Republic. ‘The Closed Mind of Richard Dawkins: His atheism is its own kind of
narrow religion’, accessed 24/02/2015,
http://www.newrepublic.com/article/119596/appetite-wonder-review-closed-mind-richard-
dawkins.
24
Richard Dawkins, personal communication, December 3, 2014.
8. ‘Religion’ and Richard Dawkins
Literature & Aesthetics 24 (2) December 2014
116
This is now, and probably already was, a very complex issue. First, it must
be considered what Dawkins’ critics mean, and what Dawkins himself
means, when using the term ‘anti-religious’. Second, it must be considered
if the various interpretations are accurate, and perhaps, admirable. Thirdly,
Dawkins has already provided some qualification. He stresses that his
primary reasons for being anti-religious are “scientific”. In light of the
content of his book, The God Delusion, it seems obvious that Dawkins’
biggest gripe against ‘religion’ is the involvement of scientifically
unproven claims, and the harm this could do to scientific progress and
education, as well as society in general. Interestingly, Dawkins’ somewhat
elaborated anti-religion aligns well with my own definition of religion. He
is opposing views of the world that are made without, or even in
contradiction with, scientific knowledge. This is certainly not unexpected
of an eminent scientist, and would seem to be an appropriate position for
anybody seeking to base life decisions on what can be demonstrated as
being most likely true.
On my definition of religion Dawkins is most certainly anti-religious,
though the term now loses much of its negative connotations, to the extent
that it may be a pragmatically positive trait. Of course, if a predominantly
functionalist definition of religion is preferred, then it would be completely
nonsensical to think of Dawkins as anti-religious. Indeed, he would himself
be religious, as some scholars have recognised, and many opponents have
accused.25
When ‘religion’ is broadened to include the liberal and ultra-
liberal, it is worth noting that Dawkins increasingly refers to himself as a
“cultural Christian”, whilst his New Atheist alum Sam Harris would
certainly be considered by most religious experts as a Buddhist. 26
Nevertheless, though many critics find Dawkins to be anti-religious, he
himself is comfortable with that seemingly derogatory label, and he
certainly is by my definition, even if it loses some of the venom that his
critics intended. Seeking more clarification, I questioned him further on
25
For an example, see Alister McGrath and Joanna Collicutt McGrath, The Dawkins
Delusion?: Atheist Fundamentalism and the Denial of the Divine (London: SPCK, 2007).
26
See my earlier comments and numerous quotations in Raphael Lataster, ‘New
Theologians, New Atheists, and Public Engagement’, Alternative Spirituality and Religion
Review, vol. 4, no. 1 (2013), pp. 70-91. Furthermore, Dawkins revealed to me that he is not
averse to calling himself “spiritual”, and that some aspects of “alternative” religions like
Buddhism might be “quite good”.
9. ‘Religion’ and Richard Dawkins
Literature & Aesthetics 24 (2) December 2014 117
whether his anti-religious attitudes were limited to certain faith traditions,
or if they applied to all.
I am ‘anti-all-religions’ but some are obviously much worse than others.27
While this seems decisive, I question further, to determine if he actively
opposes the likes of the Buddhist and Taoist religions. Dawkins replies:
They’re obviously much better, and it’s hard to be very strongly ‘anti them’.
It’s much easier to be strongly anti Roman Catholicism and Islam, both of
which are major forces for evil.28
This is consistent with his earlier writings, which made clear that his
disdain for religion is mostly limited to the Abrahamic faiths, with the
Eastern religions generally overlooked. In a chapter that makes it obvious
that his criticisms tend to be about the great monotheistic faiths, Dawkins
declares, “I shall not be concerned at all with other religions such as
Buddhism or Confucianism”, and questions whether these are religions at
all.29
Clearly, he is not truly contra all religions, even when he is content to
label himself ‘anti-religious’, and he is using a narrow definition of religion
that many sophisticated scholars would reject. His view is either nuanced or
over-simplistic, with a sort of hierarchy of religions and their potential for
harm.30
Furthermore, in surely what would be a lesser-known point from
his The God Delusion, Dawkins clarifies that he is not therein opposing
alternative or functionalistic religions, but supernatural religions, with his
focus generally being on theism (rather than alternative God-concepts such
as deism and pantheism) and the Judeo-Christian Yahweh, and that he
generally uses the term ‘religion’ in the ‘common’ sense.31
It is worth
noting that Dawkins’ focussing on theism further enables him to speak with
authority on such matters, despite his lack of philosophical sophistication,
as not only is there a lack of evidence for the existence of anything
supernatural, but even the most competent of theistic and analytic
27
Richard Dawkins, personal communication, December 3, 2014.
28
Richard Dawkins, personal communication, December 3, 2014.
29
Richard Dawkins, The God Delusion (London: Bantam, 2006), pp. 37-38.
30
For the scholars that find Dawkins’ view of religion as overly simplistic, the discussion
effectively reduces to perspective and semantics. The critical point is that he looks much
more favourably upon the ‘ways of life’ such as Buddhism and other Far Eastern traditions.
If we grant that these are also religions, then it is obvious that Dawkins is not as anti-
religious as is commonly perceived. What he opposes is precisely what sophisticated critical
scholars tend to unanimously oppose: extremism and violence.
31
Dawkins, The God Delusion, pp. 13-20.
10. ‘Religion’ and Richard Dawkins
Literature & Aesthetics 24 (2) December 2014
118
philosophers have failed to demonstrate that an existing god must be of the
theistic-type.32
Dawkins clearly is most concerned with certain streams of religions.
If this is anti-religion, it certainly is a brand that can be shared with even
the most tolerant and inclusive of secular elites, as well as more liberal
believers. Indeed, even conservative and extremist believers tend to share
this view, seeing as they often attack each other. Interestingly, one scholar,
also a liberal Christian, whilst generally opposing Dawkins, recognises the
benefits of Dawkins’ efforts to “call against violence, mindless bigotry and
unquestioning dogmatism, and abuse of responsibility and privilege by
those who have taken up spiritual vocations”.33
On being asked why it is
that he finds some religious claims to be so offensive, Dawkins’ response
further illustrates that he is not actually opposed to all religions:
I think it’s educationally pernicious to fill children’s minds up with
falsehoods when the truth is so exciting, about the nature of the universe,
where it comes from, things like that. We’re so close to understanding it. But
also, of course, religions – not all of them, but some of them – inspire people
to do terrible deeds.34
Because of faith, which by definition requires no
evidence. It can be used to justify suicide bombings, beheading apostates,
stoning people to death.35
As if it were not yet clear enough, just to be sure, I ask if his attacks are
generally directed at the more ‘extremist’ forms of religion, with Dawkins
eliminating any doubt:
32
This has been demonstrated by (the relatively few) secular scholars dabbling in the
Philosophy of Religion. For a particularly notable critique of Richard Swinburne’s analytic
case for the theistic God’s existence, oft-seen as the most promising, see Herman Philipse,
God in the Age of Science?: A Critique of Religious Reason (Oxford: Oxford University
Press, 2012). I have also critiqued William Lane Craig’s arguments for the theistic and
Christian God’s existence, and continue to do so. See Lataster, ‘New Theologians, New
Atheists, and Public Engagement’ and Raphael Lataster, ‘A Philosophical and Historical
Analysis of William Lane Craig’s Resurrection of Jesus Argument’, Think, vol. 14, no. 39
(2015), pp. 59-71. For obvious reasons, those confessional philosophers of the Continental
tradition are so far removed from the discussion concerning objective evidence that they are
hardly worth mentioning.
33
Garry W. Trompf, ‘After the Dust has Settled: On Dawkinsian scholarship in The God
Delusion’, Uniting Church Studies, vol. 18, no. 2 (2012), p. 39.
34
This seems to align with my own position that exclusivist religions are more likely to be
harmful, and that their tendency towards violence would only be justifiable if supported with
good evidence. This is explored further in my doctoral thesis.
35
Richard Dawkins, personal communication, December 3, 2014.
11. ‘Religion’ and Richard Dawkins
Literature & Aesthetics 24 (2) December 2014 119
Yes, and that’s obviously sensible. I mean, why would one not?36
A sensible approach indeed; it is hard to see how such a view could be
considered noxious, particularly in a free and multicultural society. After
all, the very forms of religion he opposes tend to be exclusivist, which are
at odds with the liberal freedoms enjoyed in contemporary Western
democracies. Unable to resist, I ask him if he agrees with the primary
theme of my own religious critiques, that it is religious exclusivism that
deserves most of our attention.
Yes, I do think that. It fosters outright fighting between Christians and
Muslims, for example, in Nigeria, in Pakistan, Northern Ireland. Blind faith,
because it’s blind, justifies… In a way you can see that if you really did
believe in only one truth faith, in only one true god, you might very well be
intolerant of other religions or no religions.37
This echoes his earlier thoughts in The God Delusion, where Dawkins
narrows the object of his ire, and explains why he opposes such:
As a scientist, I am hostile to fundamentalist religion because it actively
debauches the scientific enterprise. It teaches us not to change our minds,
and not to want to know exciting things that are available to be known. It
subverts science and saps the intellect.38
It is all the more ironic, then, when he is accused of being a fundamentalist
for atheism, or that he is arrogant in his non-belief.39
In fact, while
traversing the appropriately-named Charles Darwin walk before our
interview in the Blue Mountains, a little dispute arose between Dawkins,
and our guide, Connor. Mostly happy to rely on Connor’s expertise in
identifying numerous examples of native Australia flora and fauna,
Dawkins asserted that one particular species was South African. Several
members of our troupe consulted with the all-knowing Dr Google,
36
Richard Dawkins, personal communication, December 3, 2014.
37
Richard Dawkins, personal communication, December 3, 2014.
38
Dawkins, The God Delusion, p. 284. Note that fundamentalism and exclusivism are very
much related. It would be difficult to be a fundamentalist without also being an exclusivist.
39
Many intellectuals feel this way. For a confessional perspective, see McGrath and
McGrath, The Dawkins Delusion? For a secular example, see scientist Peter Higgs’
comments in The Guardian. ‘Peter Higgs criticises Richard Dawkins over anti-religious
‘fundamentalism’’, accessed 24/02/2015,
http://www.theguardian.com/science/2012/dec/26/peter-higgs-richard-dawkins-
fundamentalism. Note also the possibility that such figures may be attributing the actions of
Dawkins’ followers to Dawkins himself, ironically, and possibly hypocritically, echoing
atheistic declarations that Jesus and Muhammad must somehow bear the responsibility for
the actions of their followers.
12. ‘Religion’ and Richard Dawkins
Literature & Aesthetics 24 (2) December 2014
120
identifying it as a Callistemon bottlebrush and revealing Dawkins’ error.
His response:
I was wrong.40
Like any good scientist, Dawkins willingly went wherever the evidence led.
That such a response might appear unexpected from this apparently
narrow-minded figure, possibly reveals just how common
mischaracterisations about Dawkins are. Similarly, during our interview, I
informed a shocked, offended, and disbelieving Dawkins, that his beloved
Oxford University held their Doctor of Divinity to be their degree of
highest academic standing, outranking their Doctor of Philosophy, Doctor
of Medicine, and yes, the all-important Doctor of Science.41
After I
revealed the relevant documents, he simply accepted that he was wrong,
and, rather expectedly, vowed to take some action on the issue.
Furthermore, I did not see the aggressive and arrogant man that so many of
his critics perceive; I saw a polite individual that apologised for minor
slights, humbly poured others’ drinks, courteously asked permission to
deviate from the discussion, and happily changed his mind, so long as there
was sufficient evidence to warrant him doing so.
With my wondering about the possibility of liberal theists, atheists,
agnostics, pantheists, deists, and other alternative folk being able to live in
peace and unite against the evils of (unjustified) religious exclusivism,
Dawkins gave his own thoughts on whether such alliances are plausible:
Yes, I have formed alliances with religious liberals on particular issues, like,
for example, creationists in schools. I formed an alliance with several
bishops in England to oppose a particular creationist school, which was
rather pernicious. So yes, I do think it does make sense to form alliances
with liberals.42
Such answers do not appear to justify the common antagonistic and
divisive portrayal of the man. Perceiving that the so-called New Atheists
are not necessarily very anti-religious, I asked Dawkins if he thinks there is
anything new about the New Atheism, and if he is indeed a New Atheist.
40
Richard Dawkins, personal communication, December 3, 2014.
41
This is made explicit here: University of Oxford. ‘Regulations for Degrees, Diplomas, and
Certificates,’ accessed 26/02/2015, http://www.admin.ox.ac.uk/statutes/regulations/307-
072.shtml. The respect accorded to this degree is also made quite clear here: University of
Oxford. ‘General Regulations,’ accessed 26/02/2015,
http://www.admin.ox.ac.uk/examregs/31-67_General_Regulations.shtml.
42
Richard Dawkins, personal communication, December 3, 2014.
13. ‘Religion’ and Richard Dawkins
Literature & Aesthetics 24 (2) December 2014 121
No, I think there’s nothing new, from what we glean from Russell, Ingersoll,
etc. I am puzzled by that phrase, and it’s a journalistic phrase. I don’t object
to it because it might have some sort of journalistic value, but I don’t think
there’s the slightest difference between what I’ve ever said and what
Bertrand Russell said, for example.43
Another of the charges levelled at ‘New Atheists’ such as Dawkins is that
they have somehow failed in disproving God’s existence, as if that was
their primary aim. This may be due – for some – to a misunderstanding of
the term ‘atheist’, which at heart is simply, ‘not theist’, and further, a
misunderstanding of Dawkins’ work. Even secular colleagues of mine from
Australian and British Religious Studies departments opined that Dawkins’
The God Delusion attempted – and failed – to prove that God does not
exist. In fact, Dawkins asserts therein, “there almost certainly is no God”,
which is a probabilistic statement (that is arguably justified via the lack of
evidence and careful Bayesian reasoning) rather than a definite one, and
further makes clear that he does not claim that he knows God does not
exist; he is an agnostic, although only to the extent that he is “agnostic
about fairies at the bottom of the garden.”44
And yet, this view is as pervasive as it is erroneous.45
Andrew
Linscott, for example, criticises New Atheists in general for failing in
“disproving the existence of God.”46
Anthony Kenny, somewhat of a self-
43
Richard Dawkins, personal communication, December 3, 2014.
44
Dawkins, The God Delusion, pp. 50-51, 111-160. Dawkins’ attempt at a formal argument
against God’s existence on pp. 157-158 is certainly deficient. He is not an analytic
philosopher, and his book did not need this attempt. Stressing the inadequacy of this, I feel,
is cavilling, as it is not crucial to his case. Dawkins also does not adequately deal with the
best arguments for God’s existence that sophisticated and theistic philosophers of religion
produce. However, given that such arguments have failed to set the scientific community
ablaze and tend to be of interest to confessional philosophers and the handful of voyeuristic
critics such as myself, there is no real need. The mainstream scientific and scholarly
community would also not expect Dawkins to refute the best arguments for young earth
creationism or geocentricity, or to become an expert in Greek mythology so as to refute the
existence of the Greek gods. Dawkins is not a professional philosopher and so should not be
expected to partake in the speculative word games typically employed by such apologists.
He is a scientist who deals with hard evidence. Of which there is none.
45
I provide more quotations from other New Atheists such as Sam Harris, Christopher
Hitchens, and Daniel Dennett, revealing that they are not necessarily anti-religious and
certainly do not rely on the non-existence of God, in Lataster, ‘New Theologians, New
Atheists, and Public Engagement’.
46
Andrew Linscott, ‘The Presumption and Insight of New Atheism’, Theology and Science,
vol. 10, no. 1 (2012), p. 39.
14. ‘Religion’ and Richard Dawkins
Literature & Aesthetics 24 (2) December 2014
122
denying atheist, 47
also points to Dawkins’ failure to disprove God’s
existence; offering up ‘agnosticism’ as the most rational position.48
Again,
this is simply a misunderstanding, as Dawkins is an agnostic. There is
obviously much overlap between agnostics (those that do not know that
God exists) and atheists (those that do not believe that God exists).
Arguably, this is another positive element to Dawkins’ work. Much like
certain African Americans and homosexuals, atheists like Dawkins have
reclaimed a term that carries with it so much emotional and historical
baggage. Along with his colleagues, Dawkins has reminded the populace
that there is nothing irrational or ‘wrong’ with being an ‘atheist’.
Interestingly, Dawkins’ more polemical former colleague, Christopher
Hitchens, even made the effort to clarify that he is an ‘anti-theist’, allowing
the possibility that God actually exists, and that he would still oppose ‘him’
if he did.49
Dawkins’ position on the supposed need to disprove God’s
existence has not changed:
You can’t disprove God. What a ridiculous idea. All you can say is that there
is no evidence, and there is exactly as much evidence as there is for fairies,
leprechauns, etc.50
Not only does Dawkins not think that it necessary for him, his colleagues,
and followers to disprove God’s existence, but he thinks it is impossible to
do so. It should now be quite obvious that Dawkins and his fellow New
Atheists have been grossly misunderstood and misrepresented, at least
when it comes to crucial issues such as the lack of evidence for many
religions’ supernatural claims, and supposedly anti-religious attitudes.
There are, of course many tangential and irrelevant criticisms,51
which can
47
One of many educated people who prefer the term ‘agnostic’, since ‘atheist’ apparently
displays more certainty. This is unambiguously false, as ‘atheist’ simply means ‘not theist’.
Though I am not aware of any, some atheists may actively believe in or dogmatically assert
the nonexistence of God; that is certainly not characteristic of all.
48
Anthony Kenny, ‘Knowledge, Belief, and Faith’, Philosophy, vol. 82, no. 3 (2007), pp.
381-397.
49
Christopher Hitchens, Letters to a Young Contrarian (Oxford: Perseus, 2001), p. 55.
50
Richard Dawkins, personal communication, December 3, 2014.
51
For example, Emeritus Professor Garry Trompf objects to Dawkins’ characterisation of
eminent scientists as atheists and his apparent denial regarding crimes committed by
atheists. See Trompf, ‘After the Dust has Settled’, pp. 29-40. I would agree with Trompf,
however, that Dawkins’ book is not an example of first-rank scholarship. Of course, it was
not intended to be. Trompf’s comments on creationism also seem to display an unawareness
of Dawkins’ alliance with more liberal believers who also oppose literalist readings of the
15. ‘Religion’ and Richard Dawkins
Literature & Aesthetics 24 (2) December 2014 123
be easily dismissed, and which should not divert our attention from
Dawkins’ (and his colleagues’) primary aims of noting the lack of evidence
for many religious claims, and warning against the many actual and
potential harms that can arise out of the beliefs in such claims. Dawkins
generally agreed, being dismissive of my attempts to goad him into
commenting on recent controversies, such as his thoughts on paedophilia,
sexism, child rearing, and the consistency of honey. However, he was
prepared to answer my question on how relevant his opinions about such
matters are to his ‘pro-science’ and ‘anti-religious’ work. Dawkins made it
quite clear how much importance should be ascribed to these ‘other’ views
of his:
None at all.52
Conclusion
In order to determine if certain criticisms of Richard Dawkins and some of
his allies are justified, such as their apparently being anti-religious, it was
necessary to consider what religion actually is. Building on Schilbrack’s
recent definition, I settled on religion being forms of life predicated upon
the reality of the superscientific. One of the many advantages of this
definition is that it aligns well with lay notions of religion, and
coincidentally seems to align with the so-called anti-religious writings put
forth by the likes of Dawkins. On this definition, to be anti-religious is
merely to prefer that decisions be made rationally, with appeal to good
evidence. I demonstrated that by this definition, Dawkins is certainly anti-
religious, and that this is not necessarily undesirable; indeed, it might be
applauded. I revealed that even on other possible interpretations of the term
‘anti-religious’, Dawkins should not be considered as such, given his focus
on the worst and most harmful fruits of religious thought, which is
something that should be – and is – opposed by secular elites and liberal
religionists alike, and his generally overlooking of entire faith traditions
such as Buddhism.
Using our interview and Dawkins’ published writings, I also
cleared up other misconceptions, such as that he and his colleagues need or
attempted to prove that there is no god, and that somehow Dawkins is an
Bible. Hence, the point of this article. Dawkins is commonly misunderstood, even by highly
sophisticated scholars.
52
Richard Dawkins, personal communication, December 3, 2014.
16. ‘Religion’ and Richard Dawkins
Literature & Aesthetics 24 (2) December 2014
124
arrogant and immutable fundamentalist.53
My intention is not to act as an
apologist for the infallible pope of New Atheism, but to reveal that he is not
deserving of all the criticisms levelled against him, and that he could
feasibly be an ally to liberal believers and more nuanced secularists alike. It
is my hope that this effort will persuade some of my fellow critical scholars
to look upon the work of such New Atheists with renewed respect, and to
identify and appreciate the positive elements of their efforts. After all, the
main thrust of The God Delusion is that adherents of Abrahamic religions
can cause great harms to society, despite many of their crucial claims being
supported by little to no evidence, and also that atheists can be rational,
moral, and intellectually fulfilled.54
That is surely something that even
many religionists and leftist ‘Old Atheists’ can agree with.55
53
A misconception concerning atheists in general is that they are ‘angry’, which several
studies have recently disconfirmed. See Brian P. Meier et al., ‘The Myth of the Angry
Atheist’, The Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, v. 149, no. 3 (2015), pp.
219-238.
54
In common parlance, for many, Dawkins has ‘made it okay’ to call oneself an atheist.
55
Even religious conservatives and exclusivists should agree, given that they are even more
strident in their criticisms of religions apart from their own.