As a result of extensive domestic drilling in the past, the U.S. has a “mature” oil and natural gas resource base. Our remaining domestic oil and natural gas are expensive to extract. Natural gas is a non-renewable fossil fuel resource that increases greenhouse gas emissions when extracted and consumed.
During the Bush Administration, millions of acres of public lands in the Rockies were targeted for natural gas drilling. The change in the landscape is dramatic, with road networks built to service the natural gas fields, destroying and fragmenting wildlife habitat and threatening the tourism industry. Rifle, CO and Pinedale, WY are a few examples of boomtowns that had to deal with increases crime rate, more wear and tear on local infrastructure, and upward pressure on local wages and housing costs.
Look Before You Leap Off the Natural Gas Bridge: Lessons from the RockiesTheWildernessSociety
Economics 101
While some natural gas lobbyists complain about the costs of renewable energy, they hypocritically cite estimates of natural gas supply that completely ignore the high costs associated with extracting unconventional natural gas. Aside from this, there are hidden costs associated with drilling, including air and water pollution, decline of recreational benefits, and loss in biodiversity.
John Rolfe-Eidos Sustainable Development in Resource Intensive RegionsEidos Australia
1. Resource developments like coal seam gas in areas like the Darling Downs are becoming more contested as they involve tradeoffs between industries like mining, agriculture, and impacts on communities.
2. An economic analysis of a coal mine in the Bowen Basin found that coal mining generated much higher profits than maintaining the land for cattle production, even after accounting for environmental and rehabilitation costs.
3. Similarly, an analysis of coal seam gas development in the Surat Basin found it would generate over 20 times the economic returns of maintaining the land for agriculture, despite some loss of productive land. However, high levels of protest remain due to concerns about impacts on water, lifestyles, and property rights.
This document discusses natural gas, including its uses, top consuming states, and advantages over coal for power generation. It also summarizes the differences between conventional and unconventional natural gas sources like shale gas, where gas is primarily located in the US, and technologies like fracking that have increased shale gas production. While this has economic and security benefits, fracking raises environmental concerns. The document concludes that increased global natural gas production depends on factors like environmental regulations, climate policy, fuel prices, and production costs.
Peak Coal in China-A GIS and Political Economy Aspect to China's Coal PolicyHou-Ying Li
The document discusses China's heavy reliance on coal, which has powered its economic growth but also caused severe environmental problems. China currently consumes half of the world's coal and coal accounts for about two-thirds of its energy mix. In response to worsening air pollution, the government has recently implemented measures to reduce coal consumption, including capping it by 2020. This has raised hopes that China may reach "peak coal" sooner than expected, potentially improving the country's air quality and reducing its carbon emissions.
This document discusses eradicating the coal industry. It argues that while coal fueled industrialization and economic growth, it has significant environmental costs like carbon dioxide emissions contributing to climate change. The document outlines challenges to eradicating coal like political influence of the coal industry but provides recommendations. It suggests policymakers implement emissions limits and renewable incentives, businesses transition to renewable energy and lobby for change, and citizens vote for stricter policies and support non-coal companies. Overall the document makes the case that coal must be phased out to address health, environmental and economic impacts of its continued large-scale use.
Slides from Ross Eisenberg's presentation.
Dorothy Coleman, Vice President of Tax and Domestic Economic Policy, NAM
Joe Trauger, Vice President of Human Resources Policy, NAM
Ross Eisenberg, Vice President of Energy and Resources Policy, NAM
Moderated by Heidi Brock, President, Aluminum Association
The document discusses alternatives to pursuing a gas-fired recovery in Australia. It summarizes views that expanding gas extraction and infrastructure risks wasting taxpayer money and locking the country into fossil fuel assets at a time when major trading partners are pursuing net zero emissions by 2050. There are concerns that pursuing more gas will not actually lower prices due to market control by a small number of companies. The potential health, environmental and water contamination risks of proposed new gas fields are also summarized from experts and local residents. Alternatives like energy efficiency and renewable energy are suggested to meet energy needs at lower cost without the risks of expanded gas development.
During the Bush Administration, millions of acres of public lands in the Rockies were targeted for natural gas drilling. The change in the landscape is dramatic, with road networks built to service the natural gas fields, destroying and fragmenting wildlife habitat and threatening the tourism industry. Rifle, CO and Pinedale, WY are a few examples of boomtowns that had to deal with increases crime rate, more wear and tear on local infrastructure, and upward pressure on local wages and housing costs.
Look Before You Leap Off the Natural Gas Bridge: Lessons from the RockiesTheWildernessSociety
Economics 101
While some natural gas lobbyists complain about the costs of renewable energy, they hypocritically cite estimates of natural gas supply that completely ignore the high costs associated with extracting unconventional natural gas. Aside from this, there are hidden costs associated with drilling, including air and water pollution, decline of recreational benefits, and loss in biodiversity.
John Rolfe-Eidos Sustainable Development in Resource Intensive RegionsEidos Australia
1. Resource developments like coal seam gas in areas like the Darling Downs are becoming more contested as they involve tradeoffs between industries like mining, agriculture, and impacts on communities.
2. An economic analysis of a coal mine in the Bowen Basin found that coal mining generated much higher profits than maintaining the land for cattle production, even after accounting for environmental and rehabilitation costs.
3. Similarly, an analysis of coal seam gas development in the Surat Basin found it would generate over 20 times the economic returns of maintaining the land for agriculture, despite some loss of productive land. However, high levels of protest remain due to concerns about impacts on water, lifestyles, and property rights.
This document discusses natural gas, including its uses, top consuming states, and advantages over coal for power generation. It also summarizes the differences between conventional and unconventional natural gas sources like shale gas, where gas is primarily located in the US, and technologies like fracking that have increased shale gas production. While this has economic and security benefits, fracking raises environmental concerns. The document concludes that increased global natural gas production depends on factors like environmental regulations, climate policy, fuel prices, and production costs.
Peak Coal in China-A GIS and Political Economy Aspect to China's Coal PolicyHou-Ying Li
The document discusses China's heavy reliance on coal, which has powered its economic growth but also caused severe environmental problems. China currently consumes half of the world's coal and coal accounts for about two-thirds of its energy mix. In response to worsening air pollution, the government has recently implemented measures to reduce coal consumption, including capping it by 2020. This has raised hopes that China may reach "peak coal" sooner than expected, potentially improving the country's air quality and reducing its carbon emissions.
This document discusses eradicating the coal industry. It argues that while coal fueled industrialization and economic growth, it has significant environmental costs like carbon dioxide emissions contributing to climate change. The document outlines challenges to eradicating coal like political influence of the coal industry but provides recommendations. It suggests policymakers implement emissions limits and renewable incentives, businesses transition to renewable energy and lobby for change, and citizens vote for stricter policies and support non-coal companies. Overall the document makes the case that coal must be phased out to address health, environmental and economic impacts of its continued large-scale use.
Slides from Ross Eisenberg's presentation.
Dorothy Coleman, Vice President of Tax and Domestic Economic Policy, NAM
Joe Trauger, Vice President of Human Resources Policy, NAM
Ross Eisenberg, Vice President of Energy and Resources Policy, NAM
Moderated by Heidi Brock, President, Aluminum Association
The document discusses alternatives to pursuing a gas-fired recovery in Australia. It summarizes views that expanding gas extraction and infrastructure risks wasting taxpayer money and locking the country into fossil fuel assets at a time when major trading partners are pursuing net zero emissions by 2050. There are concerns that pursuing more gas will not actually lower prices due to market control by a small number of companies. The potential health, environmental and water contamination risks of proposed new gas fields are also summarized from experts and local residents. Alternatives like energy efficiency and renewable energy are suggested to meet energy needs at lower cost without the risks of expanded gas development.
This document discusses several policy issues related to combating climate change through optimal climate policy design. It examines questions around determining the optimal tradeoff between economic growth and reducing global warming, optimal time paths for carbon taxes and renewable energy subsidies, and when to phase out fossil fuels. It also analyzes scenarios from a integrated assessment model that calibrates parameters to simulate policy outcomes of different climate policy approaches and their impacts on temperatures, fossil fuel and renewable energy use, carbon emissions and more.
The document discusses the causes and impacts of climate change. It states that the main causes of climate change are the increase in greenhouse gases from human activities like burning fossil fuels and biomass for energy production, deforestation, and the use of air conditioners. Industries contribute 4-6% of total greenhouse gas emissions. The impacts of climate change include melting glaciers, sea level rise that can submerge lowlands, effects on flora and fauna as well as agriculture, and impacts on human health.
This document discusses the current status and future projections of three main fossil fuels: coal, petroleum, and natural gas. For coal, estimates of remaining reserves range widely from 100-10,000 years depending on consumption rates. Petroleum reserves are expected to peak between 2020-2050, though demand is rising and expected to outpace supply within a few decades. Natural gas reserves could meet US demand for 100 years, though lower prices are impacting companies and workers in the natural gas industry. The document also outlines some pros and cons of each fossil fuel and states the author would personally invest in petroleum and natural gas stocks.
Renewable energy, including wind and solar power, has experienced explosive growth in recent years with no sign of slowing down. Read our special report, How Renewables are Winning, to learn more about this rapid period of renewable energy advancement.
The document summarizes the environmental impacts of coal production and use in the United States and China. It finds that coal mining causes significant health and safety risks for miners in both countries, with China's coal mining industry being the most dangerous in the world. Surface coal mining also leads to destruction of terrestrial habitats, particularly through mountain top removal practices. Both countries rely heavily on coal for electricity generation, with over half of power coming from coal-fired plants. Burning coal releases air pollutants that harm public health and contributes substantially to global greenhouse gas emissions.
1. The document discusses concerns about increasing energy demands and emissions as well as the need for sustainable energy sources.
2. It argues that nuclear power is a safe and low-emissions energy source based on industry safety standards and comparisons to the impacts of coal. International organizations like the IAEA have helped improve nuclear safety over time.
3. Coal power plants emit more radiation than nuclear plants and produce deadly emissions like sulfur dioxide, while nuclear accidents have caused relatively few deaths compared to other energy sources like coal mining. Transitioning away from nuclear could increase emissions and costs of lives.
Global energy intensity, defined as worldwide total energy consumption divided by gross world product, decreased 0.19 percent in 2013. Although this may not seem impressive, considering that energy intensity increased steeply between 2008 and 2010, this small decline continues a much-needed trend toward lower energy intensity, writes Haibing Ma, China Program Manager at the Worldwatch Institute.
The document summarizes key findings from reports by the International Energy Agency in November 2013. It finds that:
1) Fossil fuels still account for over 80% of the world's energy supply and CO2 emissions from fuel combustion continue to rise exponentially, putting the world on a trajectory for 6°C of warming by 2100.
2) There has been little change in the global energy sector's reliance on fossil fuels or coal since 1971, and their share of the energy mix is projected to only decline slightly by 2035.
3) Despite growth in non-fossil sources like nuclear and hydropower, CO2 emissions from the power sector are projected to increase from 13.0 gigat
The document summarizes CO2 emissions data for Brighton & Hove from 2005 to 2009. It reports that:
1) The target amount of CO2 emissions per person to stabilize climate change is 1 tonne per year. Brighton & Hove residents emitted 4.8 tonnes per person in 2009.
2) Road transport accounted for 27% of end-user CO2 emissions in Brighton & Hove in 2009, while industry and commercial sectors accounted for 43% and the domestic sector accounted for 30%.
3) Emissions vary locally mainly due to economic and geographic differences between areas. The document urges readers to act now on CO2 emissions before it's too late.
John Hanger Webinar: The Truth About Gas Drilling and America's Energy ChoicesMarcellus Drilling News
This document is from MarcellusDrilling.com and discusses trends in U.S. energy production and use. It notes that the U.S. set gas production records in 2011 and is now the world's largest gas producer, with shale gas making up 37% of supply. It also discusses increases in renewable energy like wind and solar and decreasing use of oil and coal. The document outlines criticisms of natural gas drilling but argues that gas and renewables will continue growing to replace coal and oil in the coming decades.
Shale gas is natural gas trapped within shale rock formations typically located 2,000-7,000 feet underground. Shale gas production has significantly increased in the United States since 2000, providing 20% of domestic natural gas production by 2010. The document predicts that 46% of US natural gas will come from shale gas deposits by 2035 due to the large amount of untapped shale gas resources estimated at 482 trillion cubic feet. Shale gas is an important source of cleaner burning energy that provides economic benefits through jobs, tax revenue, and landowner payments.
The US Coal Crash – Evidence for Structural Change (PDF) finds that, in the last few years, US coal markets have been pounded by a combination of cheaper renewables, energy efficiency measures, increasing construction costs and a rash of legal challenges, as well as the rise of shale gas.
Study: Identifying Key Economic Impacts of Recent Increases in U.S. Natural G...Marcellus Drilling News
A new study published by the American Gas Association outlining the positive economic impact the expanding supply of natural gas has had in the U.S. In 2011, 150,000 new jobs were created in the shale gas industry. Another 194,000 jobs sold goods and services to the industry. Overall, consumers are saving money on their natural gas bills, and jobs are being created in an economic recession, thanks to hydraulic fracturing and shale gas.
Climate change and energy production have a close relationship, as climate change affects energy production and energy production contributes to climate change through greenhouse gas emissions. The document discusses how Pakistan's energy sector is vulnerable to climate change impacts like decreased hydropower generation due to less water availability. It recommends that Pakistan increase use of renewable energy sources like solar and wind, adopt newer less-emitting technologies, and improve energy efficiency to mitigate climate change impacts on its energy sector.
This document is a critical review of landowners' perceptions of wind turbines in Ireland. It begins with an introduction discussing the need for renewable energy due to climate change. It then provides background on wind energy development in Ireland. The document aims to understand landowners' views of wind farms through a survey. It finds that while landowners see environmental and economic benefits, there are also concerns around placement, noise, and property values. The conclusion calls for better siting of turbines and open communication with local communities.
Taiwan announced INDC target voluntarily to combat climate changeepaslideshare
Taiwan has committed to reducing greenhouse gas emissions by 50% from projected business-as-usual levels by 2030 in its Intended Nationally Determined Contribution. This targets a reduction to 214 million tons of CO2 equivalent emissions by 2030, down from a projected 428 million tons if no action was taken. Taiwan considered factors like future economic and population growth, existing emissions reduction policies, and targets set by other countries in determining its 2030 target. The target will help Taiwan meet its long-term goal under domestic law of reducing emissions 50% below 2005 levels by 2050.
The document discusses a new agreement called the Asia-Pacific Partnership on Clean Development and Climate that was announced last week involving the US, China, India, Japan, South Korea and Australia as an alternative to the Kyoto Protocol. It summarizes that the new agreement [1] breaks the climate change deadlock, [2] was negotiated without the UN or EU, and [3] includes countries that represent half the world's economy and greenhouse gas emissions. Additionally, [4] it focuses on innovative technology rather than targets to combat global warming in a way that supports development and economic growth.
The Edison Electric Institute and electric power industry allies launched the "Power Partners" program to support President Bush's commitment to slowing and eventually reversing the growth of US greenhouse gas emissions. Power Partners is a voluntary initiative where the electric power sector will work with the Department of Energy to reduce carbon dioxide emissions from the power sector by 3-5% over the decade through projects like natural gas generation, clean coal technology, nuclear energy, renewables, efficiency programs, and international partnerships. The program aims to build on past success from voluntary partnerships to address climate change.
Journal of Economic Perspectives—Volume 30, Number 1—Winter 20.docxcroysierkathey
Journal of Economic Perspectives—Volume 30, Number 1—Winter 2016—Pages 117–138
F ossil fuels provide substantial economic benefits, but in recent decades, a series of concerns have arisen about their environmental costs. In the United States, for example, the Clean Air Act in 1970 and 1977 addressed concerns
over the emissions of so-called conventional pollutions, notably airborne particulate
matter, by imposing fuel economy standards on vehicles and regulations to reduce
emissions from stationary sources. During the 1980s, concerns mounted about how
the combustion of fossil fuels could lead to acid rain and rising ozone levels. The
Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 created frameworks to reduce sulfur dioxide
and nitrogen oxide from power plant emissions, as well as from the combustion
of gasoline and diesel fuels in vehicles. However, in many of the world’s largest
cities in the emerging economies around the world, the conventional forms of
air pollution from burning fossil fuels—especially particulates, sulfur oxides,
and nitrogen oxides—are still exacting a heavy toll on human health (Chay and
Will We Ever Stop Using Fossil Fuels?
■ Thomas Covert is Assistant Professor of Microeconomics, Booth School of Business, Univer-
sity of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois. Michael Greenstone is the Milton Friedman Professor in
Economics and the College and Director of the Energy Policy Institute at Chicago, both at the
University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois. Christopher R. Knittel is William Barton Rogers
Professor of Energy Economics, Sloan School of Management, and Director of the Center for
Energy and Environmental Policy Research, all at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology,
Cambridge, Massachusetts. Greenstone and Knittel are also Research Associates, National
Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, Massachusetts. Their email addresses are thomas.
[email protected], [email protected], and [email protected]
† For supplementary materials such as appendices, datasets, and author disclosure statements, see the
article page at
http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/jep.30.1.117 doi=10.1257/jep.30.1.117
Thomas Covert, Michael Greenstone, and
Christopher R. Knittel
j_covert_301.indd 117 1/20/16 6:57 AM
118 Journal of Economic Perspectives
Greenstone 2003; Chen, Ebenstein, Greenstone, and Li 2013; Knittel, Miller, and
Sanders forthcoming).
By the mid-1990s, concerns about the role of fossil fuels in generating emis-
sions of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases gained traction. Approximately
65 percent of global greenhouse gas emissions are generated by fossil fuel combus-
tion.1 Of these emissions, coal is responsible for 45 percent, oil for 35 percent, and
natural gas for 20 percent.2 To reduce carbon dioxide emissions by enough to miti-
gate the chance of disruptive climate change in a substantial way, there would seem to
be only two possible options. One is to find ways to capture carbon from the air and
store it. T ...
Journal of Economic Perspectives—Volume 30, Number 1—Winter 20.docxtawnyataylor528
Journal of Economic Perspectives—Volume 30, Number 1—Winter 2016—Pages 117–138
F ossil fuels provide substantial economic benefits, but in recent decades, a series of concerns have arisen about their environmental costs. In the United States, for example, the Clean Air Act in 1970 and 1977 addressed concerns
over the emissions of so-called conventional pollutions, notably airborne particulate
matter, by imposing fuel economy standards on vehicles and regulations to reduce
emissions from stationary sources. During the 1980s, concerns mounted about how
the combustion of fossil fuels could lead to acid rain and rising ozone levels. The
Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 created frameworks to reduce sulfur dioxide
and nitrogen oxide from power plant emissions, as well as from the combustion
of gasoline and diesel fuels in vehicles. However, in many of the world’s largest
cities in the emerging economies around the world, the conventional forms of
air pollution from burning fossil fuels—especially particulates, sulfur oxides,
and nitrogen oxides—are still exacting a heavy toll on human health (Chay and
Will We Ever Stop Using Fossil Fuels?
■ Thomas Covert is Assistant Professor of Microeconomics, Booth School of Business, Univer-
sity of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois. Michael Greenstone is the Milton Friedman Professor in
Economics and the College and Director of the Energy Policy Institute at Chicago, both at the
University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois. Christopher R. Knittel is William Barton Rogers
Professor of Energy Economics, Sloan School of Management, and Director of the Center for
Energy and Environmental Policy Research, all at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology,
Cambridge, Massachusetts. Greenstone and Knittel are also Research Associates, National
Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, Massachusetts. Their email addresses are thomas.
[email protected], [email protected], and [email protected]
† For supplementary materials such as appendices, datasets, and author disclosure statements, see the
article page at
http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/jep.30.1.117 doi=10.1257/jep.30.1.117
Thomas Covert, Michael Greenstone, and
Christopher R. Knittel
j_covert_301.indd 117 1/20/16 6:57 AM
118 Journal of Economic Perspectives
Greenstone 2003; Chen, Ebenstein, Greenstone, and Li 2013; Knittel, Miller, and
Sanders forthcoming).
By the mid-1990s, concerns about the role of fossil fuels in generating emis-
sions of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases gained traction. Approximately
65 percent of global greenhouse gas emissions are generated by fossil fuel combus-
tion.1 Of these emissions, coal is responsible for 45 percent, oil for 35 percent, and
natural gas for 20 percent.2 To reduce carbon dioxide emissions by enough to miti-
gate the chance of disruptive climate change in a substantial way, there would seem to
be only two possible options. One is to find ways to capture carbon from the air and
store it. T ...
The document argues that natural gas and nuclear power are the only realistic options to meet the dual goals of decreasing carbon emissions while meeting increasing global energy demand. It makes three key points:
1) Converting coal plants to natural gas and using natural gas for transportation will significantly reduce emissions in the short-term as nuclear plants require more time to develop.
2) Only natural gas and nuclear can meet rising global energy demands at scale, as renewables have much lower energy densities and require vast amounts of land that is not available.
3) A plan is needed to implement increased natural gas use while expediting permitting and construction of more nuclear plants to achieve these emission reductions and energy needs over the long run.
This document discusses several policy issues related to combating climate change through optimal climate policy design. It examines questions around determining the optimal tradeoff between economic growth and reducing global warming, optimal time paths for carbon taxes and renewable energy subsidies, and when to phase out fossil fuels. It also analyzes scenarios from a integrated assessment model that calibrates parameters to simulate policy outcomes of different climate policy approaches and their impacts on temperatures, fossil fuel and renewable energy use, carbon emissions and more.
The document discusses the causes and impacts of climate change. It states that the main causes of climate change are the increase in greenhouse gases from human activities like burning fossil fuels and biomass for energy production, deforestation, and the use of air conditioners. Industries contribute 4-6% of total greenhouse gas emissions. The impacts of climate change include melting glaciers, sea level rise that can submerge lowlands, effects on flora and fauna as well as agriculture, and impacts on human health.
This document discusses the current status and future projections of three main fossil fuels: coal, petroleum, and natural gas. For coal, estimates of remaining reserves range widely from 100-10,000 years depending on consumption rates. Petroleum reserves are expected to peak between 2020-2050, though demand is rising and expected to outpace supply within a few decades. Natural gas reserves could meet US demand for 100 years, though lower prices are impacting companies and workers in the natural gas industry. The document also outlines some pros and cons of each fossil fuel and states the author would personally invest in petroleum and natural gas stocks.
Renewable energy, including wind and solar power, has experienced explosive growth in recent years with no sign of slowing down. Read our special report, How Renewables are Winning, to learn more about this rapid period of renewable energy advancement.
The document summarizes the environmental impacts of coal production and use in the United States and China. It finds that coal mining causes significant health and safety risks for miners in both countries, with China's coal mining industry being the most dangerous in the world. Surface coal mining also leads to destruction of terrestrial habitats, particularly through mountain top removal practices. Both countries rely heavily on coal for electricity generation, with over half of power coming from coal-fired plants. Burning coal releases air pollutants that harm public health and contributes substantially to global greenhouse gas emissions.
1. The document discusses concerns about increasing energy demands and emissions as well as the need for sustainable energy sources.
2. It argues that nuclear power is a safe and low-emissions energy source based on industry safety standards and comparisons to the impacts of coal. International organizations like the IAEA have helped improve nuclear safety over time.
3. Coal power plants emit more radiation than nuclear plants and produce deadly emissions like sulfur dioxide, while nuclear accidents have caused relatively few deaths compared to other energy sources like coal mining. Transitioning away from nuclear could increase emissions and costs of lives.
Global energy intensity, defined as worldwide total energy consumption divided by gross world product, decreased 0.19 percent in 2013. Although this may not seem impressive, considering that energy intensity increased steeply between 2008 and 2010, this small decline continues a much-needed trend toward lower energy intensity, writes Haibing Ma, China Program Manager at the Worldwatch Institute.
The document summarizes key findings from reports by the International Energy Agency in November 2013. It finds that:
1) Fossil fuels still account for over 80% of the world's energy supply and CO2 emissions from fuel combustion continue to rise exponentially, putting the world on a trajectory for 6°C of warming by 2100.
2) There has been little change in the global energy sector's reliance on fossil fuels or coal since 1971, and their share of the energy mix is projected to only decline slightly by 2035.
3) Despite growth in non-fossil sources like nuclear and hydropower, CO2 emissions from the power sector are projected to increase from 13.0 gigat
The document summarizes CO2 emissions data for Brighton & Hove from 2005 to 2009. It reports that:
1) The target amount of CO2 emissions per person to stabilize climate change is 1 tonne per year. Brighton & Hove residents emitted 4.8 tonnes per person in 2009.
2) Road transport accounted for 27% of end-user CO2 emissions in Brighton & Hove in 2009, while industry and commercial sectors accounted for 43% and the domestic sector accounted for 30%.
3) Emissions vary locally mainly due to economic and geographic differences between areas. The document urges readers to act now on CO2 emissions before it's too late.
John Hanger Webinar: The Truth About Gas Drilling and America's Energy ChoicesMarcellus Drilling News
This document is from MarcellusDrilling.com and discusses trends in U.S. energy production and use. It notes that the U.S. set gas production records in 2011 and is now the world's largest gas producer, with shale gas making up 37% of supply. It also discusses increases in renewable energy like wind and solar and decreasing use of oil and coal. The document outlines criticisms of natural gas drilling but argues that gas and renewables will continue growing to replace coal and oil in the coming decades.
Shale gas is natural gas trapped within shale rock formations typically located 2,000-7,000 feet underground. Shale gas production has significantly increased in the United States since 2000, providing 20% of domestic natural gas production by 2010. The document predicts that 46% of US natural gas will come from shale gas deposits by 2035 due to the large amount of untapped shale gas resources estimated at 482 trillion cubic feet. Shale gas is an important source of cleaner burning energy that provides economic benefits through jobs, tax revenue, and landowner payments.
The US Coal Crash – Evidence for Structural Change (PDF) finds that, in the last few years, US coal markets have been pounded by a combination of cheaper renewables, energy efficiency measures, increasing construction costs and a rash of legal challenges, as well as the rise of shale gas.
Study: Identifying Key Economic Impacts of Recent Increases in U.S. Natural G...Marcellus Drilling News
A new study published by the American Gas Association outlining the positive economic impact the expanding supply of natural gas has had in the U.S. In 2011, 150,000 new jobs were created in the shale gas industry. Another 194,000 jobs sold goods and services to the industry. Overall, consumers are saving money on their natural gas bills, and jobs are being created in an economic recession, thanks to hydraulic fracturing and shale gas.
Climate change and energy production have a close relationship, as climate change affects energy production and energy production contributes to climate change through greenhouse gas emissions. The document discusses how Pakistan's energy sector is vulnerable to climate change impacts like decreased hydropower generation due to less water availability. It recommends that Pakistan increase use of renewable energy sources like solar and wind, adopt newer less-emitting technologies, and improve energy efficiency to mitigate climate change impacts on its energy sector.
This document is a critical review of landowners' perceptions of wind turbines in Ireland. It begins with an introduction discussing the need for renewable energy due to climate change. It then provides background on wind energy development in Ireland. The document aims to understand landowners' views of wind farms through a survey. It finds that while landowners see environmental and economic benefits, there are also concerns around placement, noise, and property values. The conclusion calls for better siting of turbines and open communication with local communities.
Taiwan announced INDC target voluntarily to combat climate changeepaslideshare
Taiwan has committed to reducing greenhouse gas emissions by 50% from projected business-as-usual levels by 2030 in its Intended Nationally Determined Contribution. This targets a reduction to 214 million tons of CO2 equivalent emissions by 2030, down from a projected 428 million tons if no action was taken. Taiwan considered factors like future economic and population growth, existing emissions reduction policies, and targets set by other countries in determining its 2030 target. The target will help Taiwan meet its long-term goal under domestic law of reducing emissions 50% below 2005 levels by 2050.
The document discusses a new agreement called the Asia-Pacific Partnership on Clean Development and Climate that was announced last week involving the US, China, India, Japan, South Korea and Australia as an alternative to the Kyoto Protocol. It summarizes that the new agreement [1] breaks the climate change deadlock, [2] was negotiated without the UN or EU, and [3] includes countries that represent half the world's economy and greenhouse gas emissions. Additionally, [4] it focuses on innovative technology rather than targets to combat global warming in a way that supports development and economic growth.
The Edison Electric Institute and electric power industry allies launched the "Power Partners" program to support President Bush's commitment to slowing and eventually reversing the growth of US greenhouse gas emissions. Power Partners is a voluntary initiative where the electric power sector will work with the Department of Energy to reduce carbon dioxide emissions from the power sector by 3-5% over the decade through projects like natural gas generation, clean coal technology, nuclear energy, renewables, efficiency programs, and international partnerships. The program aims to build on past success from voluntary partnerships to address climate change.
Journal of Economic Perspectives—Volume 30, Number 1—Winter 20.docxcroysierkathey
Journal of Economic Perspectives—Volume 30, Number 1—Winter 2016—Pages 117–138
F ossil fuels provide substantial economic benefits, but in recent decades, a series of concerns have arisen about their environmental costs. In the United States, for example, the Clean Air Act in 1970 and 1977 addressed concerns
over the emissions of so-called conventional pollutions, notably airborne particulate
matter, by imposing fuel economy standards on vehicles and regulations to reduce
emissions from stationary sources. During the 1980s, concerns mounted about how
the combustion of fossil fuels could lead to acid rain and rising ozone levels. The
Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 created frameworks to reduce sulfur dioxide
and nitrogen oxide from power plant emissions, as well as from the combustion
of gasoline and diesel fuels in vehicles. However, in many of the world’s largest
cities in the emerging economies around the world, the conventional forms of
air pollution from burning fossil fuels—especially particulates, sulfur oxides,
and nitrogen oxides—are still exacting a heavy toll on human health (Chay and
Will We Ever Stop Using Fossil Fuels?
■ Thomas Covert is Assistant Professor of Microeconomics, Booth School of Business, Univer-
sity of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois. Michael Greenstone is the Milton Friedman Professor in
Economics and the College and Director of the Energy Policy Institute at Chicago, both at the
University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois. Christopher R. Knittel is William Barton Rogers
Professor of Energy Economics, Sloan School of Management, and Director of the Center for
Energy and Environmental Policy Research, all at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology,
Cambridge, Massachusetts. Greenstone and Knittel are also Research Associates, National
Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, Massachusetts. Their email addresses are thomas.
[email protected], [email protected], and [email protected]
† For supplementary materials such as appendices, datasets, and author disclosure statements, see the
article page at
http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/jep.30.1.117 doi=10.1257/jep.30.1.117
Thomas Covert, Michael Greenstone, and
Christopher R. Knittel
j_covert_301.indd 117 1/20/16 6:57 AM
118 Journal of Economic Perspectives
Greenstone 2003; Chen, Ebenstein, Greenstone, and Li 2013; Knittel, Miller, and
Sanders forthcoming).
By the mid-1990s, concerns about the role of fossil fuels in generating emis-
sions of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases gained traction. Approximately
65 percent of global greenhouse gas emissions are generated by fossil fuel combus-
tion.1 Of these emissions, coal is responsible for 45 percent, oil for 35 percent, and
natural gas for 20 percent.2 To reduce carbon dioxide emissions by enough to miti-
gate the chance of disruptive climate change in a substantial way, there would seem to
be only two possible options. One is to find ways to capture carbon from the air and
store it. T ...
Journal of Economic Perspectives—Volume 30, Number 1—Winter 20.docxtawnyataylor528
Journal of Economic Perspectives—Volume 30, Number 1—Winter 2016—Pages 117–138
F ossil fuels provide substantial economic benefits, but in recent decades, a series of concerns have arisen about their environmental costs. In the United States, for example, the Clean Air Act in 1970 and 1977 addressed concerns
over the emissions of so-called conventional pollutions, notably airborne particulate
matter, by imposing fuel economy standards on vehicles and regulations to reduce
emissions from stationary sources. During the 1980s, concerns mounted about how
the combustion of fossil fuels could lead to acid rain and rising ozone levels. The
Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 created frameworks to reduce sulfur dioxide
and nitrogen oxide from power plant emissions, as well as from the combustion
of gasoline and diesel fuels in vehicles. However, in many of the world’s largest
cities in the emerging economies around the world, the conventional forms of
air pollution from burning fossil fuels—especially particulates, sulfur oxides,
and nitrogen oxides—are still exacting a heavy toll on human health (Chay and
Will We Ever Stop Using Fossil Fuels?
■ Thomas Covert is Assistant Professor of Microeconomics, Booth School of Business, Univer-
sity of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois. Michael Greenstone is the Milton Friedman Professor in
Economics and the College and Director of the Energy Policy Institute at Chicago, both at the
University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois. Christopher R. Knittel is William Barton Rogers
Professor of Energy Economics, Sloan School of Management, and Director of the Center for
Energy and Environmental Policy Research, all at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology,
Cambridge, Massachusetts. Greenstone and Knittel are also Research Associates, National
Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, Massachusetts. Their email addresses are thomas.
[email protected], [email protected], and [email protected]
† For supplementary materials such as appendices, datasets, and author disclosure statements, see the
article page at
http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/jep.30.1.117 doi=10.1257/jep.30.1.117
Thomas Covert, Michael Greenstone, and
Christopher R. Knittel
j_covert_301.indd 117 1/20/16 6:57 AM
118 Journal of Economic Perspectives
Greenstone 2003; Chen, Ebenstein, Greenstone, and Li 2013; Knittel, Miller, and
Sanders forthcoming).
By the mid-1990s, concerns about the role of fossil fuels in generating emis-
sions of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases gained traction. Approximately
65 percent of global greenhouse gas emissions are generated by fossil fuel combus-
tion.1 Of these emissions, coal is responsible for 45 percent, oil for 35 percent, and
natural gas for 20 percent.2 To reduce carbon dioxide emissions by enough to miti-
gate the chance of disruptive climate change in a substantial way, there would seem to
be only two possible options. One is to find ways to capture carbon from the air and
store it. T ...
The document argues that natural gas and nuclear power are the only realistic options to meet the dual goals of decreasing carbon emissions while meeting increasing global energy demand. It makes three key points:
1) Converting coal plants to natural gas and using natural gas for transportation will significantly reduce emissions in the short-term as nuclear plants require more time to develop.
2) Only natural gas and nuclear can meet rising global energy demands at scale, as renewables have much lower energy densities and require vast amounts of land that is not available.
3) A plan is needed to implement increased natural gas use while expediting permitting and construction of more nuclear plants to achieve these emission reductions and energy needs over the long run.
This document proposes an energy plan to transition the US from fossil fuel dependence to renewable sources over 50 years. It outlines how the current reliance on coal, oil and gas negatively impacts both the economy and environment through issues like global warming, health costs, crop damage, and foreign oil dependence. The plan recommends using natural gas in the short term while expanding solar, wind, geothermal and other renewables. It argues this mix of sources can meet US energy demands sustainably while improving security, health and reducing pollution.
A bridge to nowhere: methane emissions and the greenhouse gas footprint of na...Marcellus Drilling News
A so-called research paper by Cornell professor Robert Howarth who attempts to prop up his wild theories that methane is worse for the earth than burning coal by reviewing other people's research and issuing so-called reports in so-called "peer reviewed" (and obscure) online journals. The original is published here: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ese3.35/full
Letter from Dr. Larry Cathles to Gov. Andrew Cuomo Urging End to Moratorium o...Marcellus Drilling News
The letter urges New York Governor Cuomo to lift the moratorium on unconventional natural gas development for three key reasons: 1) Producing natural gas can reduce global warming by over 40% compared to immediately adopting zero-carbon energy, and substituting natural gas for coal improves health and economic outcomes; 2) Regulating development ensures natural gas poses less risk than economically equivalent activities and provides large economic benefits; 3) Developing natural gas safely can encourage other areas and countries to substitute it for coal, keeping long-term warming to acceptable levels.
The document discusses the Pickens Plan, which aims to reduce US dependence on oil by increasing use of wind and natural gas. It proposes replacing oil with natural gas for transportation and replacing natural gas with wind for electricity generation. If implemented successfully, the plan would significantly decrease oil demand and prices. The plan would incentivize reducing oil use through a tariff on oil imports. It argues this would make the US more energy independent and create jobs. However, some argue there is insufficient demand for such changes without subsidies to shift demand.
The document discusses three key assumptions about natural gas: that reserves will last 100 years thanks to fracking, prices will remain low, and it is cleaner than other fossil fuels. It summarizes data on current and projected US energy consumption, CO2 emissions, and natural gas production trends. Experts argue reserves have been overstated, well productivity declines rapidly, and the marginal cost of production is higher than claimed. While natural gas will remain important, its ability to replace coal significantly for electricity or oil for transportation is limited, even with increased production challenging geologically and environmentally. It may not be the "clean bridge fuel" assumed due to full lifecycle emissions and inability to scale to required energy levels.
This document discusses planning for energy needs in 2030. It notes that global energy supplies are finite, populations and energy demands are growing, and some energy sources contribute to climate change and pollution. The document examines current and projected contributions of various energy sources like oil, coal, natural gas, and nuclear. It also discusses how long current reserves may last given consumption rates. The document proposes that to address these issues, the plan for 2030 should reduce energy demands through efficiency, educate the public, and diversify energy supplies by developing new technologies, utilizing regional strengths for sources like solar and wind, and reducing reliance on imported oil.
This document discusses proposals to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions and global warming through reducing coal consumption for power generation. It proposes a biomass refinery that would process agricultural waste and forestry residuals into a coal substitute that could be co-fired with coal in existing power plants. This coal substitute would be hydrophobic, brittle like coal, and have a similar energy content as coal but would not emit the volatile organic compounds produced from burning wood pellets. Several existing projects from utilities in Europe and North America establishing facilities to produce coal substitutes from woody biomass are also described.
The document discusses the monumental challenge of transitioning to a hydrogen economy from the current fossil fuel economy. It outlines the numerous technological, economic, and social barriers that are impeding this transition, including issues with hydrogen production, storage, distribution, infrastructure, and public acceptance. Overcoming these barriers to make hydrogen a viable and widespread energy alternative will be an enormous undertaking requiring significant advances and coordination across many areas.
This document discusses alternative fuels and energy security. It notes that global energy use is unsustainable and dependent on crude oil. It explores various alternative fuels like alcohols, LPG, hydrogen, CNG, LNG, and vegetable oils. It also examines fossil fuel reserves like oil, natural gas, and coal. It discusses issues with widespread use of coal and nuclear energy. The document emphasizes that ensuring stable, affordable, and environmentally friendly energy is vital for continued economic growth.
Discusses 7 or 8 energy myths and provides statistics to refute these myths. Presentation give at the 2011 APES Reading professional night by Susan Postawko
A research paper published by the nonpartisan Brookings Institution that finds the shale and fracking revoluation in America have had enormous economic benefits for all Americans--particularly those who burn natural gas. The average gas-burning household now saves over $200 per year because of lower gas prices, thanks to fracking.
The document discusses India's renewable energy scenario and progress towards targets. Key points:
- India has set a target of 50% electricity from renewables and 450GW renewable capacity by 2030 under the Paris Agreement.
- As of 2022, renewables make up 25% of installed capacity and 13% of electricity generation.
- Solar and wind capacity additions have accelerated since 2015, with over 90% of 54GW solar capacity added in this period.
- Ultra mega solar parks have been successful in scaling up low-cost solar. However, policy uncertainty has slowed growth.
- Wind growth has also slowed after a record year in 2017, with concentration of projects straining land and grids in some states.
This document provides an overview of a presentation on global warming and carbon mitigation scenarios for the next 100 years. It discusses that global warming is primarily caused by human greenhouse gas emissions from fossil fuel combustion. It outlines that over 85% of the world's energy supply is carbon-based, coming from oil, gas, and coal. It then summarizes projections for the depletion of these fossil fuel resources over the next century and models scenarios of carbon emissions resulting from their use with varying levels of mitigation through the implementation of "stabilization wedges" to reduce emissions.
This document provides an overview of a study that models global carbon emissions and atmospheric CO2 concentrations over the next 100 years under different scenarios. It begins by establishing the scientific consensus around human-caused global warming and its link to fossil fuel combustion. It then examines projections for peak production and depletion curves for oil, natural gas, and coal. Under an unmitigated scenario, this would lead to a steep rise in CO2 levels over time. However, the document explores how implementing "stabilization wedges" - measures that each reduce emissions by 25 gigatons over 50 years - can significantly cut emissions from fossil fuels according to different schedules. This achieves the goal of keeping atmospheric CO2 below dangerous thresholds.
This document discusses global warming and its causes. It notes that global warming is unequivocal and caused primarily by human greenhouse gas emissions from activities like fossil fuel use and deforestation. While globalization has contributed to the problem, it could also be part of the solution if used to help the planet's health. Suggested solutions include reducing carbon dioxide levels through decreased reliance on fossil fuels, though aggressive policies could have large economic impacts and may not effectively address the issue without participation from all countries.
This document discusses scenarios for global carbon emissions and climate change mitigation over the next 100 years. It begins with background on historical emissions and projections for peak production of oil, gas, and coal. Unmitigated emissions would result in a doubling of atmospheric CO2 levels by 2100. Implementing stabilization "wedges" through strategies like renewable energy and efficiency could significantly reduce emissions. Modeling shows that applying 3 wedges cuts coal emissions to zero by 2100 and keeps atmospheric CO2 increases lower.
Similar to A Continued Emphasis on Domestic Drilling for Natural Gas is an Inefficient and Short-sighted Energy and Climate Policy (20)
Elevate Your Nonprofit's Online Presence_ A Guide to Effective SEO Strategies...TechSoup
Whether you're new to SEO or looking to refine your existing strategies, this webinar will provide you with actionable insights and practical tips to elevate your nonprofit's online presence.
Gender and Mental Health - Counselling and Family Therapy Applications and In...PsychoTech Services
A proprietary approach developed by bringing together the best of learning theories from Psychology, design principles from the world of visualization, and pedagogical methods from over a decade of training experience, that enables you to: Learn better, faster!
A Free 200-Page eBook ~ Brain and Mind Exercise.pptxOH TEIK BIN
(A Free eBook comprising 3 Sets of Presentation of a selection of Puzzles, Brain Teasers and Thinking Problems to exercise both the mind and the Right and Left Brain. To help keep the mind and brain fit and healthy. Good for both the young and old alike.
Answers are given for all the puzzles and problems.)
With Metta,
Bro. Oh Teik Bin 🙏🤓🤔🥰
Philippine Edukasyong Pantahanan at Pangkabuhayan (EPP) CurriculumMJDuyan
(𝐓𝐋𝐄 𝟏𝟎𝟎) (𝐋𝐞𝐬𝐬𝐨𝐧 𝟏)-𝐏𝐫𝐞𝐥𝐢𝐦𝐬
𝐃𝐢𝐬𝐜𝐮𝐬𝐬 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐄𝐏𝐏 𝐂𝐮𝐫𝐫𝐢𝐜𝐮𝐥𝐮𝐦 𝐢𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐏𝐡𝐢𝐥𝐢𝐩𝐩𝐢𝐧𝐞𝐬:
- Understand the goals and objectives of the Edukasyong Pantahanan at Pangkabuhayan (EPP) curriculum, recognizing its importance in fostering practical life skills and values among students. Students will also be able to identify the key components and subjects covered, such as agriculture, home economics, industrial arts, and information and communication technology.
𝐄𝐱𝐩𝐥𝐚𝐢𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐍𝐚𝐭𝐮𝐫𝐞 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐒𝐜𝐨𝐩𝐞 𝐨𝐟 𝐚𝐧 𝐄𝐧𝐭𝐫𝐞𝐩𝐫𝐞𝐧𝐞𝐮𝐫:
-Define entrepreneurship, distinguishing it from general business activities by emphasizing its focus on innovation, risk-taking, and value creation. Students will describe the characteristics and traits of successful entrepreneurs, including their roles and responsibilities, and discuss the broader economic and social impacts of entrepreneurial activities on both local and global scales.
CapTechTalks Webinar Slides June 2024 Donovan Wright.pptxCapitolTechU
Slides from a Capitol Technology University webinar held June 20, 2024. The webinar featured Dr. Donovan Wright, presenting on the Department of Defense Digital Transformation.
Temple of Asclepius in Thrace. Excavation resultsKrassimira Luka
The temple and the sanctuary around were dedicated to Asklepios Zmidrenus. This name has been known since 1875 when an inscription dedicated to him was discovered in Rome. The inscription is dated in 227 AD and was left by soldiers originating from the city of Philippopolis (modern Plovdiv).
A Continued Emphasis on Domestic Drilling for Natural Gas is an Inefficient and Short-sighted Energy and Climate Policy
1. Look Before You Leap Off the Natural Gas Bridge: Lessons from the Rockies Pete Morton, Ph.D. Director of Economics Senior Resource Economist Denver, CO October 2009
2. Look Before You Leap Off the Natural Gas Bridge: Lessons from the Rockies A Continued Emphasis on Domestic Drilling for Natural Gas is an Inefficient and Short-sighted Energy and Climate Policy Morton, P. (2009)
3. A Continued Emphasis on Domestic Drilling for Oil and Natural Gas is an Inefficient Energy-Climate Policy As a result of extensive domestic drilling in the past, the U.S. has a “mature” oil and natural gas resource base. Our remaining domestic oil and natural gas are expensive to extract. Natural gas is a non-renewable fossil fuel resource that increases greenhouse gas emissions when extracted and consumed. Thesis An energy-climate policy that continues to emphasize domestic drilling is an inefficient approach for reducing energy costs for consumers, creating jobs, increasing long term energy security for America, and addressing global climate change. Morton, P. (2009)
4. U.S. Domestic Drilling by Decade, by Type of Well (1950s, 1960s, 1970s, 1980s, 1990s, and 2000 – Aug 2009) Since 1950, nearly 2.5 million wells were drilled in the U.S., including over 1 million oil wells, about 650,000 natural gas wells, and 766,000 dry wells. More oil and natural gas wells have been drilled in the U.S. than the rest of the world combined. Iranian Revolution and Iraq-Iran War Data Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration, October 2009 Morton, P. (2009)
5. U.S. domestic oil production peaked in 1970. U.S. Domestic Oil Production Per Year (1949 – 2006) U.S. Domestic Natural Gas Production Per Year (1949 – 2006) Data Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration, 2008 U.S. domestic natural gas production peaked in 1973. Data Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration, 2008 Morton, P. (2009)
6. The U.S. has a Mature Resource Base and our Remaining Domestic Oil and Natural Gas Resources are Expensive More oil and natural gas wells have been drilled in the U.S. than in all other countries combined. In general, our remaining oil and natural gas resources have high extraction and energy costs, emit considerable pollution during production and consumption, and have a declining productivity per well. The declining productivity of U.S. oil and natural gas wells, when combined with the increasing extraction costs, support the thesis that an emphasis on domestic drilling is an inefficient energy and climate policy. The Average Productivity of U.S. Oil and Natural Gas Wells is Declining while the Costs per Well are Increasing (Source: U.S. EIA 2008). Morton, P. (2009)
7. A Continued Emphasis on Domestic Drilling is an Inefficient Energy-Climate Policy Subsidizing domestic drilling hurts the U.S. economy by increasing the federal deficit and by directing capital investments away from other more productive sectors of our economy (Kaufman and Cleveland 1991). “The available evidence suggests that these (Bush energy) policies will collide with the realities of the state of depletion of the domestic oil resource base, the economics of the international oil market, and the ecology of some the planet’s most important ecosystems. The policies will fail to improve our energy security or reduce OPEC’s market control, and they will damage the U.S. economy and the environment in significant ways” (Cleveland and Kaufman 2002). Morton, P. (2009)
8. “The Potential Gas Committee… reported in June that the U.S. has 1,836 Tcf …of technically recoverable natural gas…When the U.S. Department of Energy’s proven reserves are added to the total, the U.S. future natural gas supply is over 2,000 Tcf. At today’s rate of use, this is enough natural gas to meet demand for the next 100 years.” Senator James Inhofe (R-Okla.), July 2009 Does the U.S. really have 100-year supply of natural gas? Let’s do the math – based on current demand. If we assume an economic recovery rate of 100 percent for the undiscovered, unproven, technically recoverable natural gas, the PGC estimate suggests 2,074 Tcf (trillion cubic feet) of U.S. total domestic supply (1,836 Tcf recovered plus 238 Tcf of proven reserves). Current U.S. natural gas demand is about 23 Tcf per year. Optimistically assuming an economic recovery rate of 100 percent, domestic supplies will last 90 years. Note: This calculation assumes we become “energy independent”. If we continue to import natural gas, our supply will last longer. If we assume an economic recovery rate of 80 percent, our domestic supply of natural gas will last 74 years based on current demand. If we assume a 50 percent economic recovery rate, our domestic supply of natural gas will last 50 years based on current demand. Morton, P. (2009)
9. Does the U.S. have 100-year supply of natural gas? Let’s do the math – but this time with natural gas demand increasing. Let’s again use the PGC estimate of 2,074 Tcf of total domestic natural gas supply – but assume that Congressional tax breaks and subsidies increase the demand for natural gas. If we assume annual demand for natural gas increases 2 percent, domestic natural gas supplies will last only 46 to 52 years, based on economic recovery rates of 80 and 100 percent, respectively. If we assume annual demand for natural gas increases 5 percent, domestic natural gas supplies will only last 32 and 35 years, based on economic recovery rates of 80 to 100 percent, respectively. Note: Natural gas supply estimates from the government’s Energy Information Administration are 15 percent less than the PGC supply estimates. Obviously if we use the lower EIA estimates, our nation’s supply of natural gas will last fewer years than estimated here. Morton, P. (2009)
10. “I am disturbed that public companies and investment analysts make fantastic claims about the rates and reserves for new shale plays without calibrating them to the only play that has significant production history. Almost every assumption used by the industry to support predictions about the Haynesville or Marcellus Shale plays is questionable based on well performance in the Barnett Shale….There are many lessons we can learn from the Barnett Shale, and they all suggest a cautious approach to developing new shale plays.” Arthur Berman, a contributing editor and columnist for World Oil magazine, is a geological consultant whose specialties are subsurface petroleum geology, seismic interpretation, and database design and management Morton, P. (2009)
11. “…my concern is that everybody wants natural gas to be their answer. Pickens wants it to displace imported oil. Proponents of renewable energy want it as a backup to fill the intermittency of wind and solar. Anti-nuclear people want it instead of nuclear. And anti-coal people want it to displace coal. Everybody wants to put all their eggs in the basket of natural gas.” Vince Matthews, Colorado State Geologist (2009) “But Matthews isn't convinced enough natural gas exists to be the answer for all needs. Unlike the earlier deposits of natural gas, the so-called shale plays stop producing very rapidly, requiring far more drilling.” The Carbon Conundrum, Allen Best (2009) Morton, P. (2009)
12. True or False: Natural gas produces half as much carbon as coal. This statement is only true if we narrowly focus only on combustion at the power plant. This statement is false when we include the fugitive carbon dioxide and methane emissions associated with upstream and downstream activities. It is the fugitive emissions, not necessarily the combustion emissions, that are causing significant air pollution problems in rural communities in the west. A Life Cycle Analysis is needed to really compare the GHG emission benefits from burning more natural gas. Morton, P. (2009)
13. A Life Cycle Analysis Reveals that the Climate Advantage of Natural Gas over Coal is Smaller than Assumed. “One of the most important results of this thesis is that life cycles matter…. When comparing coal and natural gas for electricity generation, if we only look at the GHG emissions from the power plant, natural gas looks like a much better fuel choice…Looking at the life cycle however, has allowed us to see that these benefits at the combustion plant are reduced by the emissions from other stages of the life cycle. Looking at the life cycle also allowed us to identify that…the benefits of natural gas over coal are not very significant….” (Jaramilla 2007, page 73-74) Dr. Jaramilla’s dissertation found that the life cycle analysis does not increase greenhouse gas emissions as much for coal as it does for natural gas. This is because most of the GHG emissions associated with coal occur during combustion. Extracting unconventional natural gas (shale gas, coal bed methane, tight sands gas) requires drilling more wells, requires more pipelines, more compressor stations, and more roads – all of which suggest that fugitive GHG emissions per Btu will increase with unconventional natural gas when compared to conventional natural gas. Morton, P. (2009)
14. When Fugitive GHG Emissions are Counted, the Climate Advantage of Natural Gas over Coal Decreases and may Disappear all Together. The life cycle analysis by Jaramillo (2007) shows the CO2 advantage of burning natural gas over coal to be small. That advantage will decrease when we include the GHG emissions produced from building the necessary infrastructure to burn natural gas in coal plants and/or cars. The advantage of natural gas over coal may disappear all together when we include the carbon lost from converting forestland to natural gas pads. Forest conversion accounts for approximately 25% of global carbon dioxide emissions. If industry drills 30-50,000 wells each year and converts 100,000-250,000 acres of forest land in the south and the east to natural gas well pads, waste pits and pipelines – the forest carbon lost from the forest conversion will be significant. Morton, P. (2009)
15. As the U.S exploits its remaining natural gas endowment, much of the new drilling is likely to occur on private land in Texas, the south, and the eastern United States. Potential concerns for local citizens include private property rights, water and air pollution, impacts on other businesses, and social justice issues. Morton, P. (2009)
16. What About Future Generations? Question 1: Does a continued emphasis on increasing domestic production of our non-renewable oil and natural gas resources reduce the energy security of our great grandchildren? The U.S. has less than 4 percent of the world’s natural gas reserves but we account for 21 percent of the world’s demand for natural gas (EIA 2009). Morton, P. (2009)
17. What About Future Generations? The U.S. has less than 4 percent of the world’s natural gas reserves but we account for 21 percent of the world’s demand for natural gas (EIA 2009). Question 2: Do we have a moral responsibility to reduce our oil and natural gas consumption in order to “stretch” our domestic supply, so that future generations will have more resources and more energy options available to them? Morton, P. (2009)
18. Rawls’s Veil of Ignorance and Our Decision to Drill for Natural Gas The “veil of ignorance” deprives parties of all knowledge of particular facts about themselves, about one another, and even about their society and its history. John Rawls, A Theory of Justice, 1971 Question 3. If you did not know whether you were to be alive in 2009 -- the current generation -- or in the year 2525 – a future generation -- would you: Prefer the current generation to rapidly consume our remaining non-renewable natural gas endowment? B) Prefer the current generation to dramatically reduce its demand-consumption in order to leave some natural gas for future generations? What would Henry David Thoreau, John Muir, Rosalie Edge, Aldo Leopold, Marjory Stoneman Douglas, Teddy Roosevelt, Rachael Carson, Celia Hunter, or Gaylord Nelson do? Morton, P. (2009)
19. Demand Side Management and A Consumption Ethic To address consumer costs, energy security, job creation and climate change in an economically sound manner, we should focus our efforts and incentives much more on the demand side of the equation -- and much less on the supply side. If, for example, we decrease our annual demand for natural gas 1 percent -- down to half of our current rate of consumption -- U.S. domestic natural gas supplies will last 118 to 150 years, based on economic recovery rates of 80 and 100 percent, respectively. To help reduce our energy demand and our nation’s ecological footprint, perhaps it is time to embrace an American “consumption ethic” -- which flows directly from Aldo Leopold’s “land ethic”. Morton, P. (2009)
20. The Land Ethic “All ethics so far evolved rest upon a single premise that the individual is a member of a community of interdependent parts….The land ethic simply enlarges the boundaries of the community to include soils, waters, plants, and animals, or collectively: the land. In short, a land ethic changes the role of Homo sapiens from conqueror of the land-community to plain member and citizen of it. It implies respect for his fellow-members, and also respect for the community as such.” Aldo Leopold (1949), A Sand County Almanac. Morton, P. (2009)
21. Contact: Pete Morton, Ph.D. Director of Economics The Wilderness Society pete_morton@tws.org www.wilderness.org