SlideShare a Scribd company logo
Audio
Evaluation
Muhammad Syaffa
Production Process Evaluation
Research
• Strengths
By doing my research before executing my project was essential as it shows me what is
the trend now that appeals to audience. With that I can find useful insights and use it
for my own podcast.
• Weakness
I should’ve included more existing products on the market into my research. With this,
it may improve my podcast better in the forms of delivering and the tone of my voices
on the podcast. It could also inspire me to include more content that appeals more to
my targeted audience.
Planning
• Strengths
With planning it really helps me to lay out all my ideas and my script that I need to
use my podcast. Planning also helped me to explore more ideas on what to use for my
podcast ranges from content to the tone of my voice that I should be using on my
podcast.
• Weakness
The main weakness of my planning would be that its not organized enough
which resulted in me to rush finishing my product to meet the deadline I set.
Time Management
I think my time management went well. This is because I was able to finish my
project according to my schedule and was able to produced it just in time for
the deadline. If I would have more time given to add more interesting
contents into my podcast. Hence, my podcast would’ve been more interesting
and could’ve been more appealing. If I would’ve have more time I will add
more content such as adding quizzes or asking more questions towards my
co-hosts about their opinions on their favourite genre.
Technical Qualities
SIMILARATIES
• The structure of our podcasts are the same.
• Both our podcasts contain informative content to entertain our targeted audience
and the appeal to our audience.
• We both uses relax and informal tone in our podcast so that our audience could
enjoy our podcast casually.
• Both our podcasts have co-hosts in it so that it will be more entertaining.
DIFFERENCES
• Some podcasts usually focused on a specific genre but mine was done
spontaneously which I think appeals more as the conversation will be casual.
• My podcast focuses more on my co-hosts opinions about their favourite genre and
specific artists compare to other podcast that focuses more a fixed genre.
Aural Qualities
I believe that my product was good with my self only using
premier pro for a while. It was definitely creative and different
compared to podcasts that are available on the market right
now. The difference is not just subtle it is not noticeable as I said
earlier that my podcast focuses more on peoples’ opinions about
their taste in music and their favourite artists, compared to other
podcasts out there who only focuses more on a specific genre. I
like the whole part of my podcast although my sound effects got
corrupted on my podcast I am still satisfied with the whole
outcome of my podcast. I would definitely try to recover back my
music effects in order to make my product more appealing to my
targeted audience. I would also add more content to it and more
informative insights for my audience to enjoy my podcast more.
Audience Appeal
I used informal tone in my dialogue so that the
whole atmosphere of the podcast would be
casual and relaxed. With this I believe that my
audience would enjoy the conversation more.
My co-hosts also talked about recent songs in
order to appeal more to people with
psychographic of belongers. With this belongers
would listen to my podcast and be interested in
it. I also made my podcast accessible and free so
that many people can enjoy my content.
Peer
Feedback
Feedback 1
• What did you like about the product?
The questions were very good with some good
responses, and it was funny and it felt like I was
involved in a nice funny conversation
• What improvements could have been made to
the product?
It felt quite rushed at the beginning and end which
could be because of time so give yourself more time
next time.
Feedback 2
• What did you like about the product?
I liked the extensive conversations about
peoples preferences towards music and why
they listen to it.
• What improvements could have been made to
the product?
The podcast should’ve had music in it even just
for the intro and outro.
Feedback 3
• What did you like about the product?
– I like how the podcast talks about the boys favourite
music. And when they first listened to that music and
what got them to like that music.
• What improvements could have been made to
the product?
The only thing that Mo could improve on Is adding
music in the beginning and ending or in the
background, it just needs a little something to spice
it up a little.
Peer Feedback Summary
• What do you agree with from your peer
feedback?
– I agree that I should’ve added music for the intro
and the outro for my podcast.
• What do you disagree with from your peer
feedback?
– I disagree that one of my classmate claimed that I
was rushing, I think that my flow was calm and
stable.
Peer Feedback Summary
I would’ve add music effects at the intro and the outro of my
podcast. The music that I possibly would use is RnB because those
type of music fits the whole atmosphere of the podcast. It gives a
relaxed vibe and my targeted audience would enjoy my podcast
even more. Furthermore, I will slow down in the future when I’m
doing my podcast if it will make my audience to enjoy my podcast
better. In order to maximise my audiences’ pleasure I will
definitely add more content such as adding quizzes and invite
more co-hosts to share their stories and opinions about their
favourite genre of music and even their favourite artist.

More Related Content

Similar to 7. Evaluation(4).pptx

7. fmp evaluation final
7. fmp evaluation final7. fmp evaluation final
7. fmp evaluation final
Kieran Bradley
 
7. evaluation(audio)
7. evaluation(audio)7. evaluation(audio)
7. evaluation(audio)
JoeFarrell32
 
7. fmp evaluation final 2 1
7. fmp evaluation final 2 17. fmp evaluation final 2 1
7. fmp evaluation final 2 1
Kieran Bradley
 
8. evaluation (js)
8. evaluation (js)8. evaluation (js)
8. evaluation (js)
Jack Sullivan
 
8. evaluation (lf) audio
8. evaluation (lf) audio8. evaluation (lf) audio
8. evaluation (lf) audio
Media Studies
 
7. fmp evaluation submission
7. fmp evaluation submission 7. fmp evaluation submission
7. fmp evaluation submission
Kieran Bradley
 
7.evaluation
7.evaluation7.evaluation
7.evaluation
Adele Rolf
 
7. evaluation(podcast)
7. evaluation(podcast)7. evaluation(podcast)
7. evaluation(podcast)
Josh Ruff
 
7. evaluation(4)
7. evaluation(4)7. evaluation(4)
7. evaluation(4)
HarryAllinson2
 
7. evaluation(4) (1)
7. evaluation(4) (1)7. evaluation(4) (1)
7. evaluation(4) (1)
HarryAllinson2
 
Unit 6 evaluation
Unit 6 evaluationUnit 6 evaluation
Unit 6 evaluation
JakeJarvis5
 
7. evaluation
7. evaluation7. evaluation
7. evaluation
Media Studies
 
7. evaluation(4)
7. evaluation(4)7. evaluation(4)
7. evaluation(4)
ELLIPRINCE
 
7. evaluation(7)
7. evaluation(7)7. evaluation(7)
7. evaluation(7)
BethRouse3
 
7. evaluation
7. evaluation7. evaluation
7. evaluation
josh22bailey
 
7. evaluation
7. evaluation7. evaluation
7. evaluation
Daniel Thompson
 
7. evaluation(4)
7. evaluation(4)7. evaluation(4)
7. evaluation(4)
caleb wilcox
 
7. evaluation(4)
7. evaluation(4)7. evaluation(4)
7. evaluation(4)
jordanne kay
 

Similar to 7. Evaluation(4).pptx (20)

7. fmp evaluation final
7. fmp evaluation final7. fmp evaluation final
7. fmp evaluation final
 
7. evaluation(4) (1)
7. evaluation(4) (1)7. evaluation(4) (1)
7. evaluation(4) (1)
 
7. evaluation(4) (1)
7. evaluation(4) (1)7. evaluation(4) (1)
7. evaluation(4) (1)
 
7. evaluation(audio)
7. evaluation(audio)7. evaluation(audio)
7. evaluation(audio)
 
7. fmp evaluation final 2 1
7. fmp evaluation final 2 17. fmp evaluation final 2 1
7. fmp evaluation final 2 1
 
8. evaluation (js)
8. evaluation (js)8. evaluation (js)
8. evaluation (js)
 
8. evaluation (lf) audio
8. evaluation (lf) audio8. evaluation (lf) audio
8. evaluation (lf) audio
 
7. fmp evaluation submission
7. fmp evaluation submission 7. fmp evaluation submission
7. fmp evaluation submission
 
7.evaluation
7.evaluation7.evaluation
7.evaluation
 
7. evaluation(podcast)
7. evaluation(podcast)7. evaluation(podcast)
7. evaluation(podcast)
 
7. evaluation(4)
7. evaluation(4)7. evaluation(4)
7. evaluation(4)
 
7. evaluation(4) (1)
7. evaluation(4) (1)7. evaluation(4) (1)
7. evaluation(4) (1)
 
Unit 6 evaluation
Unit 6 evaluationUnit 6 evaluation
Unit 6 evaluation
 
7. evaluation
7. evaluation7. evaluation
7. evaluation
 
7. evaluation(4)
7. evaluation(4)7. evaluation(4)
7. evaluation(4)
 
7. evaluation(7)
7. evaluation(7)7. evaluation(7)
7. evaluation(7)
 
7. evaluation
7. evaluation7. evaluation
7. evaluation
 
7. evaluation
7. evaluation7. evaluation
7. evaluation
 
7. evaluation(4)
7. evaluation(4)7. evaluation(4)
7. evaluation(4)
 
7. evaluation(4)
7. evaluation(4)7. evaluation(4)
7. evaluation(4)
 

More from HaziqYou

7. Evaluation (FMP).pptx
7. Evaluation (FMP).pptx7. Evaluation (FMP).pptx
7. Evaluation (FMP).pptx
HaziqYou
 
6. Production Reflection (FMP).pptx
6. Production Reflection (FMP).pptx6. Production Reflection (FMP).pptx
6. Production Reflection (FMP).pptx
HaziqYou
 
5. Pre-Production (FMP).pptx
5. Pre-Production (FMP).pptx5. Pre-Production (FMP).pptx
5. Pre-Production (FMP).pptx
HaziqYou
 
4. Proposal (FMP).docx
4. Proposal (FMP).docx4. Proposal (FMP).docx
4. Proposal (FMP).docx
HaziqYou
 
3. Production Experiments (FMP).pptx
3. Production Experiments (FMP).pptx3. Production Experiments (FMP).pptx
3. Production Experiments (FMP).pptx
HaziqYou
 
2. Research (FMP).pptx
2. Research (FMP).pptx2. Research (FMP).pptx
2. Research (FMP).pptx
HaziqYou
 
1. Initial Plans (FMP) (1).pptx
1. Initial Plans (FMP) (1).pptx1. Initial Plans (FMP) (1).pptx
1. Initial Plans (FMP) (1).pptx
HaziqYou
 
6. Production Reflection(4).pptx
6. Production Reflection(4).pptx6. Production Reflection(4).pptx
6. Production Reflection(4).pptx
HaziqYou
 
5. Script.docx
5. Script.docx5. Script.docx
5. Script.docx
HaziqYou
 
5. Pre-Production(4) (1).pptx
5. Pre-Production(4) (1).pptx5. Pre-Production(4) (1).pptx
5. Pre-Production(4) (1).pptx
HaziqYou
 
4. Proposal(4).docx
4. Proposal(4).docx4. Proposal(4).docx
4. Proposal(4).docx
HaziqYou
 
3. Production Experiments(4).pptx
3. Production Experiments(4).pptx3. Production Experiments(4).pptx
3. Production Experiments(4).pptx
HaziqYou
 
3. Production Experiments(4).pptx
3. Production Experiments(4).pptx3. Production Experiments(4).pptx
3. Production Experiments(4).pptx
HaziqYou
 
2. Research(4).pptx
2. Research(4).pptx2. Research(4).pptx
2. Research(4).pptx
HaziqYou
 
1. Initial Plans(4).pptx
1. Initial Plans(4).pptx1. Initial Plans(4).pptx
1. Initial Plans(4).pptx
HaziqYou
 
5. Pre-Production (Interactive)(1).pptx
5. Pre-Production (Interactive)(1).pptx5. Pre-Production (Interactive)(1).pptx
5. Pre-Production (Interactive)(1).pptx
HaziqYou
 
Evaluation (12) (1.5).pptx
Evaluation (12) (1.5).pptxEvaluation (12) (1.5).pptx
Evaluation (12) (1.5).pptx
HaziqYou
 
7. Evaluation (12) (1) (1).pptx
7. Evaluation (12) (1) (1).pptx7. Evaluation (12) (1) (1).pptx
7. Evaluation (12) (1) (1).pptx
HaziqYou
 
5. Pre-Production (13).pptx
5. Pre-Production (13).pptx5. Pre-Production (13).pptx
5. Pre-Production (13).pptx
HaziqYou
 
4. Proposal (10) (1).docx
4. Proposal (10) (1).docx4. Proposal (10) (1).docx
4. Proposal (10) (1).docx
HaziqYou
 

More from HaziqYou (20)

7. Evaluation (FMP).pptx
7. Evaluation (FMP).pptx7. Evaluation (FMP).pptx
7. Evaluation (FMP).pptx
 
6. Production Reflection (FMP).pptx
6. Production Reflection (FMP).pptx6. Production Reflection (FMP).pptx
6. Production Reflection (FMP).pptx
 
5. Pre-Production (FMP).pptx
5. Pre-Production (FMP).pptx5. Pre-Production (FMP).pptx
5. Pre-Production (FMP).pptx
 
4. Proposal (FMP).docx
4. Proposal (FMP).docx4. Proposal (FMP).docx
4. Proposal (FMP).docx
 
3. Production Experiments (FMP).pptx
3. Production Experiments (FMP).pptx3. Production Experiments (FMP).pptx
3. Production Experiments (FMP).pptx
 
2. Research (FMP).pptx
2. Research (FMP).pptx2. Research (FMP).pptx
2. Research (FMP).pptx
 
1. Initial Plans (FMP) (1).pptx
1. Initial Plans (FMP) (1).pptx1. Initial Plans (FMP) (1).pptx
1. Initial Plans (FMP) (1).pptx
 
6. Production Reflection(4).pptx
6. Production Reflection(4).pptx6. Production Reflection(4).pptx
6. Production Reflection(4).pptx
 
5. Script.docx
5. Script.docx5. Script.docx
5. Script.docx
 
5. Pre-Production(4) (1).pptx
5. Pre-Production(4) (1).pptx5. Pre-Production(4) (1).pptx
5. Pre-Production(4) (1).pptx
 
4. Proposal(4).docx
4. Proposal(4).docx4. Proposal(4).docx
4. Proposal(4).docx
 
3. Production Experiments(4).pptx
3. Production Experiments(4).pptx3. Production Experiments(4).pptx
3. Production Experiments(4).pptx
 
3. Production Experiments(4).pptx
3. Production Experiments(4).pptx3. Production Experiments(4).pptx
3. Production Experiments(4).pptx
 
2. Research(4).pptx
2. Research(4).pptx2. Research(4).pptx
2. Research(4).pptx
 
1. Initial Plans(4).pptx
1. Initial Plans(4).pptx1. Initial Plans(4).pptx
1. Initial Plans(4).pptx
 
5. Pre-Production (Interactive)(1).pptx
5. Pre-Production (Interactive)(1).pptx5. Pre-Production (Interactive)(1).pptx
5. Pre-Production (Interactive)(1).pptx
 
Evaluation (12) (1.5).pptx
Evaluation (12) (1.5).pptxEvaluation (12) (1.5).pptx
Evaluation (12) (1.5).pptx
 
7. Evaluation (12) (1) (1).pptx
7. Evaluation (12) (1) (1).pptx7. Evaluation (12) (1) (1).pptx
7. Evaluation (12) (1) (1).pptx
 
5. Pre-Production (13).pptx
5. Pre-Production (13).pptx5. Pre-Production (13).pptx
5. Pre-Production (13).pptx
 
4. Proposal (10) (1).docx
4. Proposal (10) (1).docx4. Proposal (10) (1).docx
4. Proposal (10) (1).docx
 

Recently uploaded

TESDA TM1 REVIEWER FOR NATIONAL ASSESSMENT WRITTEN AND ORAL QUESTIONS WITH A...
TESDA TM1 REVIEWER  FOR NATIONAL ASSESSMENT WRITTEN AND ORAL QUESTIONS WITH A...TESDA TM1 REVIEWER  FOR NATIONAL ASSESSMENT WRITTEN AND ORAL QUESTIONS WITH A...
TESDA TM1 REVIEWER FOR NATIONAL ASSESSMENT WRITTEN AND ORAL QUESTIONS WITH A...
EugeneSaldivar
 
Guidance_and_Counselling.pdf B.Ed. 4th Semester
Guidance_and_Counselling.pdf B.Ed. 4th SemesterGuidance_and_Counselling.pdf B.Ed. 4th Semester
Guidance_and_Counselling.pdf B.Ed. 4th Semester
Atul Kumar Singh
 
A Strategic Approach: GenAI in Education
A Strategic Approach: GenAI in EducationA Strategic Approach: GenAI in Education
A Strategic Approach: GenAI in Education
Peter Windle
 
The French Revolution Class 9 Study Material pdf free download
The French Revolution Class 9 Study Material pdf free downloadThe French Revolution Class 9 Study Material pdf free download
The French Revolution Class 9 Study Material pdf free download
Vivekanand Anglo Vedic Academy
 
Overview on Edible Vaccine: Pros & Cons with Mechanism
Overview on Edible Vaccine: Pros & Cons with MechanismOverview on Edible Vaccine: Pros & Cons with Mechanism
Overview on Edible Vaccine: Pros & Cons with Mechanism
DeeptiGupta154
 
Acetabularia Information For Class 9 .docx
Acetabularia Information For Class 9  .docxAcetabularia Information For Class 9  .docx
Acetabularia Information For Class 9 .docx
vaibhavrinwa19
 
The Roman Empire A Historical Colossus.pdf
The Roman Empire A Historical Colossus.pdfThe Roman Empire A Historical Colossus.pdf
The Roman Empire A Historical Colossus.pdf
kaushalkr1407
 
The basics of sentences session 5pptx.pptx
The basics of sentences session 5pptx.pptxThe basics of sentences session 5pptx.pptx
The basics of sentences session 5pptx.pptx
heathfieldcps1
 
special B.ed 2nd year old paper_20240531.pdf
special B.ed 2nd year old paper_20240531.pdfspecial B.ed 2nd year old paper_20240531.pdf
special B.ed 2nd year old paper_20240531.pdf
Special education needs
 
The approach at University of Liverpool.pptx
The approach at University of Liverpool.pptxThe approach at University of Liverpool.pptx
The approach at University of Liverpool.pptx
Jisc
 
Phrasal Verbs.XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Phrasal Verbs.XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXPhrasal Verbs.XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Phrasal Verbs.XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
MIRIAMSALINAS13
 
June 3, 2024 Anti-Semitism Letter Sent to MIT President Kornbluth and MIT Cor...
June 3, 2024 Anti-Semitism Letter Sent to MIT President Kornbluth and MIT Cor...June 3, 2024 Anti-Semitism Letter Sent to MIT President Kornbluth and MIT Cor...
June 3, 2024 Anti-Semitism Letter Sent to MIT President Kornbluth and MIT Cor...
Levi Shapiro
 
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
siemaillard
 
Unit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdf
Unit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdfUnit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdf
Unit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdf
Thiyagu K
 
Sha'Carri Richardson Presentation 202345
Sha'Carri Richardson Presentation 202345Sha'Carri Richardson Presentation 202345
Sha'Carri Richardson Presentation 202345
beazzy04
 
2024.06.01 Introducing a competency framework for languag learning materials ...
2024.06.01 Introducing a competency framework for languag learning materials ...2024.06.01 Introducing a competency framework for languag learning materials ...
2024.06.01 Introducing a competency framework for languag learning materials ...
Sandy Millin
 
Language Across the Curriculm LAC B.Ed.
Language Across the  Curriculm LAC B.Ed.Language Across the  Curriculm LAC B.Ed.
Language Across the Curriculm LAC B.Ed.
Atul Kumar Singh
 
Adversarial Attention Modeling for Multi-dimensional Emotion Regression.pdf
Adversarial Attention Modeling for Multi-dimensional Emotion Regression.pdfAdversarial Attention Modeling for Multi-dimensional Emotion Regression.pdf
Adversarial Attention Modeling for Multi-dimensional Emotion Regression.pdf
Po-Chuan Chen
 
Digital Tools and AI for Teaching Learning and Research
Digital Tools and AI for Teaching Learning and ResearchDigital Tools and AI for Teaching Learning and Research
Digital Tools and AI for Teaching Learning and Research
Vikramjit Singh
 
1.4 modern child centered education - mahatma gandhi-2.pptx
1.4 modern child centered education - mahatma gandhi-2.pptx1.4 modern child centered education - mahatma gandhi-2.pptx
1.4 modern child centered education - mahatma gandhi-2.pptx
JosvitaDsouza2
 

Recently uploaded (20)

TESDA TM1 REVIEWER FOR NATIONAL ASSESSMENT WRITTEN AND ORAL QUESTIONS WITH A...
TESDA TM1 REVIEWER  FOR NATIONAL ASSESSMENT WRITTEN AND ORAL QUESTIONS WITH A...TESDA TM1 REVIEWER  FOR NATIONAL ASSESSMENT WRITTEN AND ORAL QUESTIONS WITH A...
TESDA TM1 REVIEWER FOR NATIONAL ASSESSMENT WRITTEN AND ORAL QUESTIONS WITH A...
 
Guidance_and_Counselling.pdf B.Ed. 4th Semester
Guidance_and_Counselling.pdf B.Ed. 4th SemesterGuidance_and_Counselling.pdf B.Ed. 4th Semester
Guidance_and_Counselling.pdf B.Ed. 4th Semester
 
A Strategic Approach: GenAI in Education
A Strategic Approach: GenAI in EducationA Strategic Approach: GenAI in Education
A Strategic Approach: GenAI in Education
 
The French Revolution Class 9 Study Material pdf free download
The French Revolution Class 9 Study Material pdf free downloadThe French Revolution Class 9 Study Material pdf free download
The French Revolution Class 9 Study Material pdf free download
 
Overview on Edible Vaccine: Pros & Cons with Mechanism
Overview on Edible Vaccine: Pros & Cons with MechanismOverview on Edible Vaccine: Pros & Cons with Mechanism
Overview on Edible Vaccine: Pros & Cons with Mechanism
 
Acetabularia Information For Class 9 .docx
Acetabularia Information For Class 9  .docxAcetabularia Information For Class 9  .docx
Acetabularia Information For Class 9 .docx
 
The Roman Empire A Historical Colossus.pdf
The Roman Empire A Historical Colossus.pdfThe Roman Empire A Historical Colossus.pdf
The Roman Empire A Historical Colossus.pdf
 
The basics of sentences session 5pptx.pptx
The basics of sentences session 5pptx.pptxThe basics of sentences session 5pptx.pptx
The basics of sentences session 5pptx.pptx
 
special B.ed 2nd year old paper_20240531.pdf
special B.ed 2nd year old paper_20240531.pdfspecial B.ed 2nd year old paper_20240531.pdf
special B.ed 2nd year old paper_20240531.pdf
 
The approach at University of Liverpool.pptx
The approach at University of Liverpool.pptxThe approach at University of Liverpool.pptx
The approach at University of Liverpool.pptx
 
Phrasal Verbs.XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Phrasal Verbs.XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXPhrasal Verbs.XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Phrasal Verbs.XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
 
June 3, 2024 Anti-Semitism Letter Sent to MIT President Kornbluth and MIT Cor...
June 3, 2024 Anti-Semitism Letter Sent to MIT President Kornbluth and MIT Cor...June 3, 2024 Anti-Semitism Letter Sent to MIT President Kornbluth and MIT Cor...
June 3, 2024 Anti-Semitism Letter Sent to MIT President Kornbluth and MIT Cor...
 
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
 
Unit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdf
Unit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdfUnit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdf
Unit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdf
 
Sha'Carri Richardson Presentation 202345
Sha'Carri Richardson Presentation 202345Sha'Carri Richardson Presentation 202345
Sha'Carri Richardson Presentation 202345
 
2024.06.01 Introducing a competency framework for languag learning materials ...
2024.06.01 Introducing a competency framework for languag learning materials ...2024.06.01 Introducing a competency framework for languag learning materials ...
2024.06.01 Introducing a competency framework for languag learning materials ...
 
Language Across the Curriculm LAC B.Ed.
Language Across the  Curriculm LAC B.Ed.Language Across the  Curriculm LAC B.Ed.
Language Across the Curriculm LAC B.Ed.
 
Adversarial Attention Modeling for Multi-dimensional Emotion Regression.pdf
Adversarial Attention Modeling for Multi-dimensional Emotion Regression.pdfAdversarial Attention Modeling for Multi-dimensional Emotion Regression.pdf
Adversarial Attention Modeling for Multi-dimensional Emotion Regression.pdf
 
Digital Tools and AI for Teaching Learning and Research
Digital Tools and AI for Teaching Learning and ResearchDigital Tools and AI for Teaching Learning and Research
Digital Tools and AI for Teaching Learning and Research
 
1.4 modern child centered education - mahatma gandhi-2.pptx
1.4 modern child centered education - mahatma gandhi-2.pptx1.4 modern child centered education - mahatma gandhi-2.pptx
1.4 modern child centered education - mahatma gandhi-2.pptx
 

7. Evaluation(4).pptx

  • 3. Research • Strengths By doing my research before executing my project was essential as it shows me what is the trend now that appeals to audience. With that I can find useful insights and use it for my own podcast. • Weakness I should’ve included more existing products on the market into my research. With this, it may improve my podcast better in the forms of delivering and the tone of my voices on the podcast. It could also inspire me to include more content that appeals more to my targeted audience.
  • 4. Planning • Strengths With planning it really helps me to lay out all my ideas and my script that I need to use my podcast. Planning also helped me to explore more ideas on what to use for my podcast ranges from content to the tone of my voice that I should be using on my podcast. • Weakness The main weakness of my planning would be that its not organized enough which resulted in me to rush finishing my product to meet the deadline I set.
  • 5. Time Management I think my time management went well. This is because I was able to finish my project according to my schedule and was able to produced it just in time for the deadline. If I would have more time given to add more interesting contents into my podcast. Hence, my podcast would’ve been more interesting and could’ve been more appealing. If I would’ve have more time I will add more content such as adding quizzes or asking more questions towards my co-hosts about their opinions on their favourite genre.
  • 6. Technical Qualities SIMILARATIES • The structure of our podcasts are the same. • Both our podcasts contain informative content to entertain our targeted audience and the appeal to our audience. • We both uses relax and informal tone in our podcast so that our audience could enjoy our podcast casually. • Both our podcasts have co-hosts in it so that it will be more entertaining. DIFFERENCES • Some podcasts usually focused on a specific genre but mine was done spontaneously which I think appeals more as the conversation will be casual. • My podcast focuses more on my co-hosts opinions about their favourite genre and specific artists compare to other podcast that focuses more a fixed genre.
  • 7. Aural Qualities I believe that my product was good with my self only using premier pro for a while. It was definitely creative and different compared to podcasts that are available on the market right now. The difference is not just subtle it is not noticeable as I said earlier that my podcast focuses more on peoples’ opinions about their taste in music and their favourite artists, compared to other podcasts out there who only focuses more on a specific genre. I like the whole part of my podcast although my sound effects got corrupted on my podcast I am still satisfied with the whole outcome of my podcast. I would definitely try to recover back my music effects in order to make my product more appealing to my targeted audience. I would also add more content to it and more informative insights for my audience to enjoy my podcast more.
  • 8. Audience Appeal I used informal tone in my dialogue so that the whole atmosphere of the podcast would be casual and relaxed. With this I believe that my audience would enjoy the conversation more. My co-hosts also talked about recent songs in order to appeal more to people with psychographic of belongers. With this belongers would listen to my podcast and be interested in it. I also made my podcast accessible and free so that many people can enjoy my content.
  • 10. Feedback 1 • What did you like about the product? The questions were very good with some good responses, and it was funny and it felt like I was involved in a nice funny conversation • What improvements could have been made to the product? It felt quite rushed at the beginning and end which could be because of time so give yourself more time next time.
  • 11. Feedback 2 • What did you like about the product? I liked the extensive conversations about peoples preferences towards music and why they listen to it. • What improvements could have been made to the product? The podcast should’ve had music in it even just for the intro and outro.
  • 12. Feedback 3 • What did you like about the product? – I like how the podcast talks about the boys favourite music. And when they first listened to that music and what got them to like that music. • What improvements could have been made to the product? The only thing that Mo could improve on Is adding music in the beginning and ending or in the background, it just needs a little something to spice it up a little.
  • 13. Peer Feedback Summary • What do you agree with from your peer feedback? – I agree that I should’ve added music for the intro and the outro for my podcast. • What do you disagree with from your peer feedback? – I disagree that one of my classmate claimed that I was rushing, I think that my flow was calm and stable.
  • 14. Peer Feedback Summary I would’ve add music effects at the intro and the outro of my podcast. The music that I possibly would use is RnB because those type of music fits the whole atmosphere of the podcast. It gives a relaxed vibe and my targeted audience would enjoy my podcast even more. Furthermore, I will slow down in the future when I’m doing my podcast if it will make my audience to enjoy my podcast better. In order to maximise my audiences’ pleasure I will definitely add more content such as adding quizzes and invite more co-hosts to share their stories and opinions about their favourite genre of music and even their favourite artist.

Editor's Notes

  1. What were the strengths of your research? How did your research help your product? What were the weaknesses of your research? What could you have done better/improve? What effect would this have had on your product?
  2. What were the strengths of your planning? How did your planning help your product? What were the weaknesses of your planning? What could you have done better/improve? What effect would this have had on your product?
  3. Did you manage your time well? Did you complete your project on time or would your products have improved with additional time? What would you have done if you had more time to produce your work?
  4. Compare your work to similar existing products and discuss the similarities and differences
  5. Does your work sound good? Was it creative? What aspects of your product’s audio do you like? What would you improve? How would you improve it? Discuss the strengths and weaknesses
  6. How have you appealed to your target audience? What specific bits of content would appeal to your target audience. Make reference to specific recordings, dialogue, music and sound effects
  7. What changes would you make to your product based upon your peer feedback and why?