GLACIER FLOW AND TOPOGRAPHY MEASUREMENTS WITH TERRASAR-X AND TANDEM-X M. Eineder 1 ) , W. Abdel Jaber 2) , D. Floricioiu 1) ,  H. Rott 3) , N. Yague-Martinez 1) 1) German Aerospace Center,  2) Technische Universität München, 3) Universität Innsbruck IGARSS 2011
Drygalski Glacier, Antarctica From: Rott et al. EUSAR 2008
Drygalski Glacier after Collapse of Larsen A Photo: H. Rott
TerraSAR-X and TanDEM-X Observations Preliminary TanDEM-X DEMs TS-X 11 day intervall  series TS-X 3 repetitions 11 day intervall Stripmap mode, nominal resolution < 3 m
Video of 2007-2008 Time Series (30 Frames) Maybe zooms to different interesting spots
Velocity Analysis Method 11 day intervalls Incoherent (amplitude) image correlation technique Use of geocoded standard products, 1.25 m spacing, 1.3 looks 2D shift measurement Absolute displacement    no tie-points, no phase ambiguity Chip size 256 2  pixels   (320m) 2 Speckle Feature
Velocity Estimation – Systematic Errors (Bias) Orbit error Timing error Atmosphere Solid Earth tides See Eineder et al., Imaging Geodesy—Toward Centimeter-Level Ranging Accuracy With TerraSAR-X, IEEE TGRS 2010
Velocity Estimation – Random Errors Feature correlation: DEM error: Total = random + systematic error:
Average Three-Year Velocity Map 0.0 6.0 [m/d] 5 km A C
Temporal Velocity Profile at Point A (Terminus) Linear fit 2007-2010: -0.166 md -1 a -1 Linear fit 2007/2008: -0.336 md -1 a -1 Summer Winter Summer Winter Summer Winter    Significant seasonal variations and decelleration
Temporal Velocity Profile at Point C Summer Winter Summer Winter Summer Winter    Measurements confirm error margin (residuals stdev. < 2 cm d -1 )    slight seasonal variations, maybe decelleration
One-Year Deceleration Map A C -0.4 0.4 [md -1 a -1 ]
Three-Year Deceleration Map A C -0.4 0.4 [md -1 a -1 ]
Average Spatial Correlation Coefficient 0.0 0.7
Two Preliminary TanDEM-X DEMs Available Descending 2010-10-21 Beff=180.2 m H/2PI=-46.08 m Ascending 2010-12-11 Beff=26.0 m H/2PI=-323.2    Used both DEMs for height offset determination    Used descending DEM for analysis
Shaded DEM and 20 m Contour Lines Terminus
Drygalski Glacier Terminus Height Profile (Small Baseline DEM) 70 m    ~460 m
Difference TanDEM-X (asc) – GLOBE  DEM  300 m -300 m 0 m    1. Height loss (?), 2. Velocity and geocoding errors
TanDEM-X DEM Roughness Map Roughnes map 0.0 3.0 σ h  [m] Roughness based on 10 x 10 pixel plane residuals (50 x 50 m 2 )    Coincides with correlation map, confirms DEM quality
Conclusions Demonstrated multi-year feature tracking on glacier with 3 cmd -1  accuracy over larger areas Acceleration since 1995 confirmed again Detected strong seasonal variations ( ±0.4  md -1 ) at terminus Hints for slight (-0.166 md -1 a -1 ) deceleration 2007-2010 at terminus TanDEM-X DEM height errors within expectations over glacier TanDEM-X DEM roughness predicts feature correlation quality TanDEM-X DEM useful for terminus height / thickness estimation

5_Glacier_IGARSS11_Eineder.ppt

  • 1.
    GLACIER FLOW ANDTOPOGRAPHY MEASUREMENTS WITH TERRASAR-X AND TANDEM-X M. Eineder 1 ) , W. Abdel Jaber 2) , D. Floricioiu 1) , H. Rott 3) , N. Yague-Martinez 1) 1) German Aerospace Center, 2) Technische Universität München, 3) Universität Innsbruck IGARSS 2011
  • 2.
    Drygalski Glacier, AntarcticaFrom: Rott et al. EUSAR 2008
  • 3.
    Drygalski Glacier afterCollapse of Larsen A Photo: H. Rott
  • 4.
    TerraSAR-X and TanDEM-XObservations Preliminary TanDEM-X DEMs TS-X 11 day intervall series TS-X 3 repetitions 11 day intervall Stripmap mode, nominal resolution < 3 m
  • 5.
    Video of 2007-2008Time Series (30 Frames) Maybe zooms to different interesting spots
  • 6.
    Velocity Analysis Method11 day intervalls Incoherent (amplitude) image correlation technique Use of geocoded standard products, 1.25 m spacing, 1.3 looks 2D shift measurement Absolute displacement  no tie-points, no phase ambiguity Chip size 256 2 pixels (320m) 2 Speckle Feature
  • 7.
    Velocity Estimation –Systematic Errors (Bias) Orbit error Timing error Atmosphere Solid Earth tides See Eineder et al., Imaging Geodesy—Toward Centimeter-Level Ranging Accuracy With TerraSAR-X, IEEE TGRS 2010
  • 8.
    Velocity Estimation –Random Errors Feature correlation: DEM error: Total = random + systematic error:
  • 9.
    Average Three-Year VelocityMap 0.0 6.0 [m/d] 5 km A C
  • 10.
    Temporal Velocity Profileat Point A (Terminus) Linear fit 2007-2010: -0.166 md -1 a -1 Linear fit 2007/2008: -0.336 md -1 a -1 Summer Winter Summer Winter Summer Winter  Significant seasonal variations and decelleration
  • 11.
    Temporal Velocity Profileat Point C Summer Winter Summer Winter Summer Winter  Measurements confirm error margin (residuals stdev. < 2 cm d -1 )  slight seasonal variations, maybe decelleration
  • 12.
    One-Year Deceleration MapA C -0.4 0.4 [md -1 a -1 ]
  • 13.
    Three-Year Deceleration MapA C -0.4 0.4 [md -1 a -1 ]
  • 14.
    Average Spatial CorrelationCoefficient 0.0 0.7
  • 15.
    Two Preliminary TanDEM-XDEMs Available Descending 2010-10-21 Beff=180.2 m H/2PI=-46.08 m Ascending 2010-12-11 Beff=26.0 m H/2PI=-323.2  Used both DEMs for height offset determination  Used descending DEM for analysis
  • 16.
    Shaded DEM and20 m Contour Lines Terminus
  • 17.
    Drygalski Glacier TerminusHeight Profile (Small Baseline DEM) 70 m  ~460 m
  • 18.
    Difference TanDEM-X (asc)– GLOBE DEM 300 m -300 m 0 m  1. Height loss (?), 2. Velocity and geocoding errors
  • 19.
    TanDEM-X DEM RoughnessMap Roughnes map 0.0 3.0 σ h [m] Roughness based on 10 x 10 pixel plane residuals (50 x 50 m 2 )  Coincides with correlation map, confirms DEM quality
  • 20.
    Conclusions Demonstrated multi-yearfeature tracking on glacier with 3 cmd -1 accuracy over larger areas Acceleration since 1995 confirmed again Detected strong seasonal variations ( ±0.4 md -1 ) at terminus Hints for slight (-0.166 md -1 a -1 ) deceleration 2007-2010 at terminus TanDEM-X DEM height errors within expectations over glacier TanDEM-X DEM roughness predicts feature correlation quality TanDEM-X DEM useful for terminus height / thickness estimation

Editor's Notes

  • #3 Show position, size History, Larsen A ice shelf break up in Jan 1995 Speedup from 2-3 m/s to 6 m/s in 1995 Why Drygalski Glacier? Have new X-Band TerraSAR-X in 2007 Research, what can be done Fast flowing glacier, accelerated since 1995 What? Show what can be done w.r.t. Velocity tracking 3D Surface mapping Accuracy analysis
  • #6 Schwimmt in unteren 10 km vermutlich auf
  • #8 Einsinken bis zu 10 cm / Tag + Tidenhub!!
  • #9 B &lt;
  • #10 Massiv außer Balance seit 1995. Starkes Ausdünnen durch Massendivergenz.