This document discusses different types of language processors: assemblers, interpreters, and compilers. It provides details on each type and their functions. The document also describes the compilation process, which occurs in two phases: analysis and code generation. Analysis includes lexical analysis, syntax analysis, and producing symbol tables and parse trees. Code generation takes the intermediate code from analysis and produces the object program code. Optimization aims to improve the efficiency of the generated code.
LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEM
COMPILER DESIGN- ARCHITECTURE
INTERPRETER
ROLE OF COMPILER & INTERPRETER
COMPARISION OF INTERPRETER & COMPILER
PURE AND IMPUTER INTERPRETER
P-CODE COMPILERS
Introduction: Language Processors, the structure of a compiler, the science of building a compiler, programming language basics.
Lexical Analysis: The Role of the Lexical Analyzer, Input Buffering, Recognition of Tokens, The Lexical-Analyzer Generator Lex, Finite Automata, From Regular Expressions to Automata, Design of a Lexical-Analyzer Generator, Optimization of DFA-Based Pattern Matchers
LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEM
COMPILER DESIGN- ARCHITECTURE
INTERPRETER
ROLE OF COMPILER & INTERPRETER
COMPARISION OF INTERPRETER & COMPILER
PURE AND IMPUTER INTERPRETER
P-CODE COMPILERS
Introduction: Language Processors, the structure of a compiler, the science of building a compiler, programming language basics.
Lexical Analysis: The Role of the Lexical Analyzer, Input Buffering, Recognition of Tokens, The Lexical-Analyzer Generator Lex, Finite Automata, From Regular Expressions to Automata, Design of a Lexical-Analyzer Generator, Optimization of DFA-Based Pattern Matchers
Translation of a program written in a source language into a semantically equivalent program written in a target language
It also reports to its users the presence of errors in the source program
Whenever we create a source code and start the process of evaluating it, computer only shows the output and errors (if occurred). We don’t know the actual process behind it. The exact procedure behind the compilation task and step by step evaluation of source code are explained. In addition to that touched topics are High level languages, Low level languages, Pre-processors, Translators, Compilers, Assemblers, Interpreters, Linkers and Loaders.
Computer Science - Programming Languages / Translators
This presentation explains the different types of translators and languages of programming such as assembler, compiler, interpreter, bytecode
Translation of a program written in a source language into a semantically equivalent program written in a target language
It also reports to its users the presence of errors in the source program
Whenever we create a source code and start the process of evaluating it, computer only shows the output and errors (if occurred). We don’t know the actual process behind it. The exact procedure behind the compilation task and step by step evaluation of source code are explained. In addition to that touched topics are High level languages, Low level languages, Pre-processors, Translators, Compilers, Assemblers, Interpreters, Linkers and Loaders.
Computer Science - Programming Languages / Translators
This presentation explains the different types of translators and languages of programming such as assembler, compiler, interpreter, bytecode
Pros and cons of c as a compiler languageAshok Raj
Computer system is made of hardware and software .The hardware understands instructions in the form of electronic charge or binary language in Software programming. So the programs written in High Level Language are fed into a series of tools and OS components to get the desired machine language.This is known as Language Processing System.
June 3, 2024 Anti-Semitism Letter Sent to MIT President Kornbluth and MIT Cor...Levi Shapiro
Letter from the Congress of the United States regarding Anti-Semitism sent June 3rd to MIT President Sally Kornbluth, MIT Corp Chair, Mark Gorenberg
Dear Dr. Kornbluth and Mr. Gorenberg,
The US House of Representatives is deeply concerned by ongoing and pervasive acts of antisemitic
harassment and intimidation at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). Failing to act decisively to ensure a safe learning environment for all students would be a grave dereliction of your responsibilities as President of MIT and Chair of the MIT Corporation.
This Congress will not stand idly by and allow an environment hostile to Jewish students to persist. The House believes that your institution is in violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, and the inability or
unwillingness to rectify this violation through action requires accountability.
Postsecondary education is a unique opportunity for students to learn and have their ideas and beliefs challenged. However, universities receiving hundreds of millions of federal funds annually have denied
students that opportunity and have been hijacked to become venues for the promotion of terrorism, antisemitic harassment and intimidation, unlawful encampments, and in some cases, assaults and riots.
The House of Representatives will not countenance the use of federal funds to indoctrinate students into hateful, antisemitic, anti-American supporters of terrorism. Investigations into campus antisemitism by the Committee on Education and the Workforce and the Committee on Ways and Means have been expanded into a Congress-wide probe across all relevant jurisdictions to address this national crisis. The undersigned Committees will conduct oversight into the use of federal funds at MIT and its learning environment under authorities granted to each Committee.
• The Committee on Education and the Workforce has been investigating your institution since December 7, 2023. The Committee has broad jurisdiction over postsecondary education, including its compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, campus safety concerns over disruptions to the learning environment, and the awarding of federal student aid under the Higher Education Act.
• The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is investigating the sources of funding and other support flowing to groups espousing pro-Hamas propaganda and engaged in antisemitic harassment and intimidation of students. The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is the principal oversight committee of the US House of Representatives and has broad authority to investigate “any matter” at “any time” under House Rule X.
• The Committee on Ways and Means has been investigating several universities since November 15, 2023, when the Committee held a hearing entitled From Ivory Towers to Dark Corners: Investigating the Nexus Between Antisemitism, Tax-Exempt Universities, and Terror Financing. The Committee followed the hearing with letters to those institutions on January 10, 202
Embracing GenAI - A Strategic ImperativePeter Windle
Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies such as Generative AI, Image Generators and Large Language Models have had a dramatic impact on teaching, learning and assessment over the past 18 months. The most immediate threat AI posed was to Academic Integrity with Higher Education Institutes (HEIs) focusing their efforts on combating the use of GenAI in assessment. Guidelines were developed for staff and students, policies put in place too. Innovative educators have forged paths in the use of Generative AI for teaching, learning and assessments leading to pockets of transformation springing up across HEIs, often with little or no top-down guidance, support or direction.
This Gasta posits a strategic approach to integrating AI into HEIs to prepare staff, students and the curriculum for an evolving world and workplace. We will highlight the advantages of working with these technologies beyond the realm of teaching, learning and assessment by considering prompt engineering skills, industry impact, curriculum changes, and the need for staff upskilling. In contrast, not engaging strategically with Generative AI poses risks, including falling behind peers, missed opportunities and failing to ensure our graduates remain employable. The rapid evolution of AI technologies necessitates a proactive and strategic approach if we are to remain relevant.
Biological screening of herbal drugs: Introduction and Need for
Phyto-Pharmacological Screening, New Strategies for evaluating
Natural Products, In vitro evaluation techniques for Antioxidants, Antimicrobial and Anticancer drugs. In vivo evaluation techniques
for Anti-inflammatory, Antiulcer, Anticancer, Wound healing, Antidiabetic, Hepatoprotective, Cardio protective, Diuretics and
Antifertility, Toxicity studies as per OECD guidelines
Read| The latest issue of The Challenger is here! We are thrilled to announce that our school paper has qualified for the NATIONAL SCHOOLS PRESS CONFERENCE (NSPC) 2024. Thank you for your unwavering support and trust. Dive into the stories that made us stand out!
Introduction to AI for Nonprofits with Tapp NetworkTechSoup
Dive into the world of AI! Experts Jon Hill and Tareq Monaur will guide you through AI's role in enhancing nonprofit websites and basic marketing strategies, making it easy to understand and apply.
How to Make a Field invisible in Odoo 17Celine George
It is possible to hide or invisible some fields in odoo. Commonly using “invisible” attribute in the field definition to invisible the fields. This slide will show how to make a field invisible in odoo 17.
Welcome to TechSoup New Member Orientation and Q&A (May 2024).pdfTechSoup
In this webinar you will learn how your organization can access TechSoup's wide variety of product discount and donation programs. From hardware to software, we'll give you a tour of the tools available to help your nonprofit with productivity, collaboration, financial management, donor tracking, security, and more.
The French Revolution, which began in 1789, was a period of radical social and political upheaval in France. It marked the decline of absolute monarchies, the rise of secular and democratic republics, and the eventual rise of Napoleon Bonaparte. This revolutionary period is crucial in understanding the transition from feudalism to modernity in Europe.
For more information, visit-www.vavaclasses.com
2. TYPES OF LANGUAGE PROCESSOR
• 1.) ASSEMBLER
Is a translator program that translates assembly language to machine language.
• 2.) INTERPRETER
A type of language processor that operates one instruction at a time, translating a high-level language statement
and executing immediately.
Generally run more slowly than compiled programs.
• 3.) COMPILER
Is a translator program, which transforms a source program, composed of high-level language statement into an
object program consisting of machine-language executable code.
Structure of Programming Language
3. Compilation Occurs in 2 Broad Phases
1. Decomposes the source program into small identifiable units and analyzes
it for syntactical accuracy.
2. Takes the machine-code modules associated with the basic units identified
in the 1st phase and uses them to compose the object program.
Structure of Programming Language
4. THE COMPILE PROCESS
• SOURCE PROGRAM ANALYSIS
• LEXICAL ANALYSIS
• TOKENS
• SYMBOL TABLES
• SYSNTACTIC ANALYSIS
• PARSE TREE/ SYNTAX TREE
• ERROR HANDLER
• OPTIMIZATION
Structure of Programming Language
5. SOURCE PROGRAM ANALYSIS
• The first phase of the compile process encompasses the lexical analysis and
the syntactic analysis, producing the symbol table and intermediate
(assembly-level) code.
Structure of Programming Language
6. LEXICAL ANALYSIS
• Is concerned with the actual text of the program, which is considered to be a
meaningful sequence of characters.
Structure of Programming Language
7. TOKENS
• Separate pieces of programs.
• Are the basic symbols used by the program: identifiers, operators,
punctuation, language keywords, constants.
Structure of Programming Language
8. SYMBOL TABLES
• Also called the dictionary.
• Map program symbols such as variables with their properties such types, size,
and relative location.
Structure of Programming Language
9. SYNTACTIC ANALYSIS
• Is concerned with identifying the logical structure of the program in
accordance with the rules of grammar governing the high level language.
Structure of Programming Language
10. PARSE TREE/ SYNTAX TREE
• Contains the hierarchy of operations in the high-level language statements.
• Every leaf node contains one of the symbols (tokens) in the statement.
Structure of Programming Language
11. ERROR HANDLER
• During the lexical and syntactical analyses, information regarding an error
encountered is sent to the error handler module of the compiler, which will
arrange to print out a message to the user.
Structure of Programming Language
12. INTERMEDIATE CODE
GENERATION
• The result of the lexical and syntactic analyses and the information in the
symbol table are brought together to produce program code in some
intermediate from similar to assembly- language code.
• Output from the syntactic analysis step, the intermediate code serves as
input to the code generation step.
• Output from the syntactic analysis step the intermediate code serves as
input to the code generation step.
Structure of Programming Language
13. OPTIMIZATION
• To produce efficient code
• To make more efficient use of main storage and processor time
• To correct “ bad programming practice”
• For detecting code that can be moved out of a loop ( to improve the efficiency of
the program, and its logical structure).
• Detection and elimination of dead code
• A DEAD CODE is a program code that is accessible in the normal processing of
the program and will consequently never be executed.
Structure of Programming Language