Searching solution for 3806NRS Nursing Assignment? If yes, then make your visit to NeedAssignmentHelp. Best place for assignment writing services. https://www.needassignmenthelp.com/do-my-nursing-assignment-help
Effectiveness of the current dominant approach to integrated care in the NHS:...Sarah Wilson
Jonathan Stokes of the Greater Manchester Primary Care Patient Safety Translational Research Centre presents a systematic review of case management in integrated care.
Faster Improvement with Adaptive Implementation ResearchUCLA CTSI
Feb 3, 2016
Dr. John Ovretveit, Director of Research and Professor of Health Innovation and Evaluation at the Karolinska Institutet, presented as part of a seminar series on UCLA CTSI Dissemination, Improvement and Implementation Research.
This document outlines the steps for critically appraising a research article on prognosis using the Sudan Evidence-Based Medicine Association template. It includes developing a well-built clinical question using PICO (Patient, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome), outlining the current knowledge and selecting a research article to appraise. Key steps are summarizing the article, assessing validity and applying an appraisal scheme to evaluate relevance, validity, results and applicability of the research. The template provides guidance on critically evaluating different aspects of the study to determine the strength and potential limitations.
The cochrane library an introduction for rheumatologists - 17 feb 2014Tamara Rader
The Cochrane Library provides high-quality systematic reviews and other evidence to inform healthcare decisions. It contains six databases, including the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews which publishes Cochrane Reviews that synthesize medical studies. Cochrane Reviews follow a rigorous methodology to identify and analyze data from relevant studies to determine if interventions are effective. The goal is to provide reliable evidence to help patients, practitioners, and policymakers make informed choices about healthcare.
The document discusses the Cochrane Collaboration, which establishes systematic reviews of healthcare evidence. It specifically focuses on the Cochrane Oral Health Group, which prepares reviews of randomized controlled trials in oral health. The Group has published over 120 reviews and aims to maintain relevance and quality while encouraging impact on dental practice. Membership in the Group provides benefits like involvement in identifying important reviews to produce and opportunities for global collaboration.
This document provides an overview of systematic reviews, including how to define, conduct, and interpret one. It discusses key aspects such as the Cochrane Collaboration, developing a review protocol with inclusion/exclusion criteria and a search strategy, conducting a comprehensive literature search, assessing study quality, extracting and synthesizing data narratively or statistically, and interpreting results. The goal of a systematic review is to comprehensively and objectively summarize all evidence on a topic to facilitate informed decisions.
The fifth webinar continues the momentum of the series as it focuses on providing concrete approaches for identifying barriers and enablers, emphasising behaviour change approaches.
READ MORE: http://bit.ly/2LOwbj0
Effectiveness of the current dominant approach to integrated care in the NHS:...Sarah Wilson
Jonathan Stokes of the Greater Manchester Primary Care Patient Safety Translational Research Centre presents a systematic review of case management in integrated care.
Faster Improvement with Adaptive Implementation ResearchUCLA CTSI
Feb 3, 2016
Dr. John Ovretveit, Director of Research and Professor of Health Innovation and Evaluation at the Karolinska Institutet, presented as part of a seminar series on UCLA CTSI Dissemination, Improvement and Implementation Research.
This document outlines the steps for critically appraising a research article on prognosis using the Sudan Evidence-Based Medicine Association template. It includes developing a well-built clinical question using PICO (Patient, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome), outlining the current knowledge and selecting a research article to appraise. Key steps are summarizing the article, assessing validity and applying an appraisal scheme to evaluate relevance, validity, results and applicability of the research. The template provides guidance on critically evaluating different aspects of the study to determine the strength and potential limitations.
The cochrane library an introduction for rheumatologists - 17 feb 2014Tamara Rader
The Cochrane Library provides high-quality systematic reviews and other evidence to inform healthcare decisions. It contains six databases, including the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews which publishes Cochrane Reviews that synthesize medical studies. Cochrane Reviews follow a rigorous methodology to identify and analyze data from relevant studies to determine if interventions are effective. The goal is to provide reliable evidence to help patients, practitioners, and policymakers make informed choices about healthcare.
The document discusses the Cochrane Collaboration, which establishes systematic reviews of healthcare evidence. It specifically focuses on the Cochrane Oral Health Group, which prepares reviews of randomized controlled trials in oral health. The Group has published over 120 reviews and aims to maintain relevance and quality while encouraging impact on dental practice. Membership in the Group provides benefits like involvement in identifying important reviews to produce and opportunities for global collaboration.
This document provides an overview of systematic reviews, including how to define, conduct, and interpret one. It discusses key aspects such as the Cochrane Collaboration, developing a review protocol with inclusion/exclusion criteria and a search strategy, conducting a comprehensive literature search, assessing study quality, extracting and synthesizing data narratively or statistically, and interpreting results. The goal of a systematic review is to comprehensively and objectively summarize all evidence on a topic to facilitate informed decisions.
The fifth webinar continues the momentum of the series as it focuses on providing concrete approaches for identifying barriers and enablers, emphasising behaviour change approaches.
READ MORE: http://bit.ly/2LOwbj0
Quality assessment in systematic literature reviewJingjing Lin
This tutorial is to introduce the definition, process, and tools of quality assessment in the systematic literature review.
If you are new to my channel, you can check out the previous events together with this one to get started with the systematic literature review as a research approach.
EP11 Systematic Literature Review Planning: workflow, literature scoping, and review protocol (https://youtu.be/qukb-VytjxQ)
EP12 Develop search strategy: fishing relevant literature for your research (https://youtu.be/9cH5I03jbg0)
EP13 Literature screening: inclusion and exclusion
(https://youtu.be/BCdveqka-E4)
You can browse other previous research sharing in this YouTube list of mine (https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list...)
Please kindly subscribe if you want to be reminded when I have new videos published on YouTube.
This document outlines the steps for critically appraising research articles. It recommends beginning by reviewing the title, abstract, keywords, publication information, and author information to assess the article in 10-15 minutes. Next, the methodology, results, and implications should be evaluated. Key aspects to examine include the research ethics, literature search, study limitations, sample, data collection tools, findings relevance, and funding sources. Being able to critically appraise research helps determine if the study is valid, applicable, and conducted properly.
This document discusses critical appraisal of research evidence and provides resources for appraising different types of studies. It introduces the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP), which provides checklists for appraising systematic reviews and other study designs. The CASP checklist for systematic reviews is described in detail, including the screening questions to determine if a full appraisal is warranted, and the three main sections that assess validity of results, describe the results, and determine local applicability. Resources like CASP are important for evidence-based practitioners to evaluate the quality and applicability of scientific literature.
The document discusses lessons learned from the Southwark and Lambeth Integrated Care (SLIC) program in London. Key points:
- SLIC aimed to reduce hospital admissions and care home placements for older adults through risk stratification, holistic assessments, and care management.
- Success required agreement on the problem, dedicated teams, funding shifts to support community care, and leadership development.
- Future programs need a strong business case, co-design with citizens, and a dedicated "engine room" team to drive local transformation.
The document summarizes a qualitative analysis of discussions from a workshop aimed at developing quality indicators for injury care. The analysis identified four key themes in the consensus process: 1) specifying a clear purpose and goals for the indicators, 2) incorporating evidence, expertise, and patient perspectives, 3) considering contextual variations between health centers, and 4) contemplating data collection and management issues. The analysis provides insight into the domains discussed by experts seeking to develop standardized quality measures.
This document discusses applying lean tools and principles to healthcare design. It provides three case studies: a laser spine clinic, a pediatric clinic combining multiple specialties, and a children's emergency department. For each case, it outlines the problem, proposed solutions analyzed using lean techniques like simulation, and the data-driven design decisions. The overall message is that lean can help optimize healthcare spaces to better meet patient and operational needs.
Research requires properly planned methodology. I would like to recommend that researchers to focus on these 4 critical steps. If these steps are fulfilled, you will find it easy to conduct your research.
Critical appraisal of a journal articleDrSahilKumar
This document provides guidance on critically appraising journal articles. It defines critical appraisal as systematically identifying the strengths and weaknesses of research to assess validity and usefulness. Key aspects to evaluate include relevance of the research question, appropriateness of study design, addressing biases, adherence to original protocol, statistical analyses, and conflicts of interest. Checklists like CASP, CONSORT, and STROBE provide frameworks to appraise study methodologies like randomized trials, systematic reviews, and observational studies. The goal of critical appraisal is for clinicians to identify high-quality evidence to inform clinical practice.
This document provides an overview of grading the strength of evidence in systematic reviews. It defines grading SOE as assessing the confidence in an estimate of effect based on factors such as risk of bias, consistency, directness and precision of available studies. Grading SOE is important for decision makers to understand how much confidence can be placed in evidence. It is distinct from quality assessment of individual studies and focuses on major outcomes and comparisons.
This document discusses Evidence Informed Decision Making (EIDM) and the 6S Pyramid model for finding evidence to support clinical decisions. It defines EIDM as integrating the best research evidence with clinical expertise and patient values. The 6S Pyramid includes Systems, Summaries, Synopses, Syntheses (systematic reviews), and Studies as sources of evidence of varying strength. It provides examples of resources in each category, emphasizing the Cochrane Library as the gold standard for systematic reviews. The goal is to equip nurses with a model for efficiently searching evidence to answer clinical questions.
For more course tutorials visit
www.newtonhelp.com
This Tutorial contains 2 Different Proposal
1. Identify the needs that are present within your selected case study.
1. Final Proposal. For your Final Proposal, you will address the concerns presented in your selected
For more course tutorials visit
www.newtonhelp.com
This Tutorial contains 2 Different Proposal
1. Identify the needs that are present within your selected case study.
1. Final Proposal. For your Final Proposal, you will address the concerns presented in your selected case study from Week One and give recommendations for improvement. Utilize one of the following sample proposals to draft your Final Proposal:
Evaluation of the Integrated Care and Support Pioneers ProgrammeNuffield Trust
This document summarizes the findings of evaluations of the Integrated Care and Support Pioneers Programme in the UK. The evaluations found that while Pioneers aspired to comprehensive system change, their activities focused more narrowly on initiatives like risk stratification and care coordination teams. Progress was difficult to measure against indicators and Pioneers faced challenges from financial pressures and competing priorities. The evaluations concluded that further integration will be challenging under increasing demands on the health system.
This document provides an overview of how to conduct a systematic review. It begins by defining what a systematic review is and why they are important for evidence-based practice. It then outlines the key steps in conducting a systematic review, including formulating an answerable question using PICO(T), performing a comprehensive literature search, selecting studies and extracting data in an unbiased manner, critically appraising the evidence, and synthesizing the data. The document emphasizes that systematic reviews need to follow a structured, systematic process and make all methods explicit to minimize bias. It also discusses challenges that can arise in systematic reviews like database, publication, and language biases.
This document provides an introduction to critical appraisal. It defines critical appraisal as systematically weighing the quality and relevance of research to inform decision making. The document outlines different types of research studies including systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, and case-control studies. It discusses how to critically appraise studies by assessing their validity, results, and relevance. Key aspects of appraising randomized controlled trials are described such as randomization, blinding, accounting for all participants, and interpreting results including p-values and confidence intervals. The goal is to help readers gain skills to critically evaluate research.
This document provides guidelines for an assignment to critique a systematic research review (SRR). Students are required to choose an SRR pertaining to their practice setting and critique various aspects of it, including the relevance of the problem addressed, the levels of evidence and designs of included studies, clarity of presentation, overall findings, and implications for practice and future research. The assignment aims to develop students' ability to synthesize and disseminate research findings as well as compare and critique research designs and methodologies.
DNP-835A Patient Outcomes and Sustainable ChangeASSIGNMENT 2.docxpauline234567
DNP-835A: Patient Outcomes and Sustainable Change
ASSIGNMENT 2:
Please see the ATTACHED Quality and Sustainability Paper: Part 1
Quality and Sustainability Paper: Part 2
Assessment Description
The purpose of this assignment is to determine what is needed to promote successful implementation and sustainability of a quality or safety program for your selected health care entity/issue.
General Guidelines:
Use the following information to ensure successful completion of the assignment:
· This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
· Doctoral learners are required to use APA style for their writing assignments. The APA Style Guide is located in the Student Success Center.
· This assignment requires that you support your position by referencing six to eight scholarly resources. At least three of your supporting references must be from scholarly sources other than the assigned readings.
· You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.
· Learners will submit this assignment using the assignment dropbox in the digital classroom. In addition, learners must upload this deliverable to the Learner Dissertation Page (LDP) in the DNP PI Workspace for later use.
Directions:
Write a paper (2,000-2,500 words) that provides the following:
1. Incorporate all necessary revisions and corrections suggested by your instructor for Part 1. Synthesize the different elements of Part 1 and Part 2 into one paper using transitions to connect ideas and concepts.
2. Evaluate current evidenced-based quality and/or safety program designs that can be implemented to improve the quality and/or safety outcomes for your selected quality and/safety issue at your identified health care entity. Based on this evaluation, propose an evidence-based quality and/or safety program to address your selected issue from Part 1. Explain how your proposed design will better improve the outcomes for the selected quality and/or safety issue as compared to the program currently in place at the health care entity.
3. Identify potential obstacles (such as economics or ethical issues) that may hinder the implementation of the proposed quality and/or safety program and suggest ways to overcome these.
4. Identify stakeholders within the selected health care entity with whom you may need to collaborate and discuss the role of each stakeholder in the implementation of the proposed program. In the identification of stakeholders, also include specific groups and leaders that are needed.
5. Identify a change management theory you will use to support the implementation of your quality and/or safety program. Provide evidence that supports the use of this theory within the program you designed.
6. Discuss the expected outcomes of the implementation of your proposed quality and/or saf.
Cat ortho /certified fixed orthodontic courses by Indian dental academy Indian dental academy
This document provides information on practicing evidence-based dentistry, including defining key terms and outlining the process. It discusses formulating a focused clinical question, finding relevant evidence through searches, appraising the evidence critically, and summarizing the appraisal in a 1-page Critically Appraised Topic. Key appraisal criteria explained include treatment effects, confidence intervals, applicability of results, and determining if benefits outweigh harms. The goal of critical appraisal is incorporating valid research into teaching and practice.
Quality assessment in systematic literature reviewJingjing Lin
This tutorial is to introduce the definition, process, and tools of quality assessment in the systematic literature review.
If you are new to my channel, you can check out the previous events together with this one to get started with the systematic literature review as a research approach.
EP11 Systematic Literature Review Planning: workflow, literature scoping, and review protocol (https://youtu.be/qukb-VytjxQ)
EP12 Develop search strategy: fishing relevant literature for your research (https://youtu.be/9cH5I03jbg0)
EP13 Literature screening: inclusion and exclusion
(https://youtu.be/BCdveqka-E4)
You can browse other previous research sharing in this YouTube list of mine (https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list...)
Please kindly subscribe if you want to be reminded when I have new videos published on YouTube.
This document outlines the steps for critically appraising research articles. It recommends beginning by reviewing the title, abstract, keywords, publication information, and author information to assess the article in 10-15 minutes. Next, the methodology, results, and implications should be evaluated. Key aspects to examine include the research ethics, literature search, study limitations, sample, data collection tools, findings relevance, and funding sources. Being able to critically appraise research helps determine if the study is valid, applicable, and conducted properly.
This document discusses critical appraisal of research evidence and provides resources for appraising different types of studies. It introduces the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP), which provides checklists for appraising systematic reviews and other study designs. The CASP checklist for systematic reviews is described in detail, including the screening questions to determine if a full appraisal is warranted, and the three main sections that assess validity of results, describe the results, and determine local applicability. Resources like CASP are important for evidence-based practitioners to evaluate the quality and applicability of scientific literature.
The document discusses lessons learned from the Southwark and Lambeth Integrated Care (SLIC) program in London. Key points:
- SLIC aimed to reduce hospital admissions and care home placements for older adults through risk stratification, holistic assessments, and care management.
- Success required agreement on the problem, dedicated teams, funding shifts to support community care, and leadership development.
- Future programs need a strong business case, co-design with citizens, and a dedicated "engine room" team to drive local transformation.
The document summarizes a qualitative analysis of discussions from a workshop aimed at developing quality indicators for injury care. The analysis identified four key themes in the consensus process: 1) specifying a clear purpose and goals for the indicators, 2) incorporating evidence, expertise, and patient perspectives, 3) considering contextual variations between health centers, and 4) contemplating data collection and management issues. The analysis provides insight into the domains discussed by experts seeking to develop standardized quality measures.
This document discusses applying lean tools and principles to healthcare design. It provides three case studies: a laser spine clinic, a pediatric clinic combining multiple specialties, and a children's emergency department. For each case, it outlines the problem, proposed solutions analyzed using lean techniques like simulation, and the data-driven design decisions. The overall message is that lean can help optimize healthcare spaces to better meet patient and operational needs.
Research requires properly planned methodology. I would like to recommend that researchers to focus on these 4 critical steps. If these steps are fulfilled, you will find it easy to conduct your research.
Critical appraisal of a journal articleDrSahilKumar
This document provides guidance on critically appraising journal articles. It defines critical appraisal as systematically identifying the strengths and weaknesses of research to assess validity and usefulness. Key aspects to evaluate include relevance of the research question, appropriateness of study design, addressing biases, adherence to original protocol, statistical analyses, and conflicts of interest. Checklists like CASP, CONSORT, and STROBE provide frameworks to appraise study methodologies like randomized trials, systematic reviews, and observational studies. The goal of critical appraisal is for clinicians to identify high-quality evidence to inform clinical practice.
This document provides an overview of grading the strength of evidence in systematic reviews. It defines grading SOE as assessing the confidence in an estimate of effect based on factors such as risk of bias, consistency, directness and precision of available studies. Grading SOE is important for decision makers to understand how much confidence can be placed in evidence. It is distinct from quality assessment of individual studies and focuses on major outcomes and comparisons.
This document discusses Evidence Informed Decision Making (EIDM) and the 6S Pyramid model for finding evidence to support clinical decisions. It defines EIDM as integrating the best research evidence with clinical expertise and patient values. The 6S Pyramid includes Systems, Summaries, Synopses, Syntheses (systematic reviews), and Studies as sources of evidence of varying strength. It provides examples of resources in each category, emphasizing the Cochrane Library as the gold standard for systematic reviews. The goal is to equip nurses with a model for efficiently searching evidence to answer clinical questions.
For more course tutorials visit
www.newtonhelp.com
This Tutorial contains 2 Different Proposal
1. Identify the needs that are present within your selected case study.
1. Final Proposal. For your Final Proposal, you will address the concerns presented in your selected
For more course tutorials visit
www.newtonhelp.com
This Tutorial contains 2 Different Proposal
1. Identify the needs that are present within your selected case study.
1. Final Proposal. For your Final Proposal, you will address the concerns presented in your selected case study from Week One and give recommendations for improvement. Utilize one of the following sample proposals to draft your Final Proposal:
Evaluation of the Integrated Care and Support Pioneers ProgrammeNuffield Trust
This document summarizes the findings of evaluations of the Integrated Care and Support Pioneers Programme in the UK. The evaluations found that while Pioneers aspired to comprehensive system change, their activities focused more narrowly on initiatives like risk stratification and care coordination teams. Progress was difficult to measure against indicators and Pioneers faced challenges from financial pressures and competing priorities. The evaluations concluded that further integration will be challenging under increasing demands on the health system.
This document provides an overview of how to conduct a systematic review. It begins by defining what a systematic review is and why they are important for evidence-based practice. It then outlines the key steps in conducting a systematic review, including formulating an answerable question using PICO(T), performing a comprehensive literature search, selecting studies and extracting data in an unbiased manner, critically appraising the evidence, and synthesizing the data. The document emphasizes that systematic reviews need to follow a structured, systematic process and make all methods explicit to minimize bias. It also discusses challenges that can arise in systematic reviews like database, publication, and language biases.
This document provides an introduction to critical appraisal. It defines critical appraisal as systematically weighing the quality and relevance of research to inform decision making. The document outlines different types of research studies including systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, and case-control studies. It discusses how to critically appraise studies by assessing their validity, results, and relevance. Key aspects of appraising randomized controlled trials are described such as randomization, blinding, accounting for all participants, and interpreting results including p-values and confidence intervals. The goal is to help readers gain skills to critically evaluate research.
This document provides guidelines for an assignment to critique a systematic research review (SRR). Students are required to choose an SRR pertaining to their practice setting and critique various aspects of it, including the relevance of the problem addressed, the levels of evidence and designs of included studies, clarity of presentation, overall findings, and implications for practice and future research. The assignment aims to develop students' ability to synthesize and disseminate research findings as well as compare and critique research designs and methodologies.
DNP-835A Patient Outcomes and Sustainable ChangeASSIGNMENT 2.docxpauline234567
DNP-835A: Patient Outcomes and Sustainable Change
ASSIGNMENT 2:
Please see the ATTACHED Quality and Sustainability Paper: Part 1
Quality and Sustainability Paper: Part 2
Assessment Description
The purpose of this assignment is to determine what is needed to promote successful implementation and sustainability of a quality or safety program for your selected health care entity/issue.
General Guidelines:
Use the following information to ensure successful completion of the assignment:
· This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
· Doctoral learners are required to use APA style for their writing assignments. The APA Style Guide is located in the Student Success Center.
· This assignment requires that you support your position by referencing six to eight scholarly resources. At least three of your supporting references must be from scholarly sources other than the assigned readings.
· You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.
· Learners will submit this assignment using the assignment dropbox in the digital classroom. In addition, learners must upload this deliverable to the Learner Dissertation Page (LDP) in the DNP PI Workspace for later use.
Directions:
Write a paper (2,000-2,500 words) that provides the following:
1. Incorporate all necessary revisions and corrections suggested by your instructor for Part 1. Synthesize the different elements of Part 1 and Part 2 into one paper using transitions to connect ideas and concepts.
2. Evaluate current evidenced-based quality and/or safety program designs that can be implemented to improve the quality and/or safety outcomes for your selected quality and/safety issue at your identified health care entity. Based on this evaluation, propose an evidence-based quality and/or safety program to address your selected issue from Part 1. Explain how your proposed design will better improve the outcomes for the selected quality and/or safety issue as compared to the program currently in place at the health care entity.
3. Identify potential obstacles (such as economics or ethical issues) that may hinder the implementation of the proposed quality and/or safety program and suggest ways to overcome these.
4. Identify stakeholders within the selected health care entity with whom you may need to collaborate and discuss the role of each stakeholder in the implementation of the proposed program. In the identification of stakeholders, also include specific groups and leaders that are needed.
5. Identify a change management theory you will use to support the implementation of your quality and/or safety program. Provide evidence that supports the use of this theory within the program you designed.
6. Discuss the expected outcomes of the implementation of your proposed quality and/or saf.
Cat ortho /certified fixed orthodontic courses by Indian dental academy Indian dental academy
This document provides information on practicing evidence-based dentistry, including defining key terms and outlining the process. It discusses formulating a focused clinical question, finding relevant evidence through searches, appraising the evidence critically, and summarizing the appraisal in a 1-page Critically Appraised Topic. Key appraisal criteria explained include treatment effects, confidence intervals, applicability of results, and determining if benefits outweigh harms. The goal of critical appraisal is incorporating valid research into teaching and practice.
Write a 4-6 page annotated bibliography where you identify peer-.docxjohnbbruce72945
Write a 4-6 page annotated bibliography where you identify peer-reviewed publications that promote the use of a selected technology to enhance quality and safety standards in nursing.
Before you begin to develop the assessment you are encouraged to complete the Annotated Bibliography Formative Assessment. Completing this activity will help you succeed with the assessment and counts towards course engagement.
Rapid changes in information technology go hand-in-hand with progress in quality health care delivery, nursing practice, and interdisciplinary team collaboration. The following are only a few examples of how the health care field uses technology to provide care to patients across multiple settings:
Patient monitoring devices.
Robotics.
Electronic medical records.
Data management resources.
Ready access to current science.
Technology is essential to the advancement of the nursing profession, maintaining quality care outcomes, patient safety, and research.
This assessment will give you the opportunity to deepen your knowledge of how technology can enhance quality and safety standards in nursing. You will prepare an annotated bibliography on technology in nursing. A well-prepared annotated bibliography is a comprehensive commentary on the content of scholarly publications and other sources of evidence about a selected nursing-related technology. A bibliography of this type provides a vehicle for workplace discussion to address gaps in nursing practice and to improve patient care outcomes. As nurses become more accountable in their practice, they are being called upon to expand their role of caregiver and advocate to include fostering research and scholarship to advance nursing practice. An annotated bibliography stimulates innovative thinking to find solutions and approaches to effectively and efficiently address these issues.
Demonstration of Proficiency
By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the course competencies through the following assessment scoring guide criteria:
Competency 3: Evaluate the impact of patient care technologies on desired outcomes.
Analyze current evidence on the impact of a selected patient care technology on patient safety, quality of care, and the interdisciplinary team.
Integrate current evidence about the impact of a selected patient care technology on patient safety, quality of care, and the interdisciplinary team into a recommendation.
Competency 4: Recommend the use of a technology to enhance quality and safety standards for patients.
Describe organizational factors influencing the selection of a technology in the health care setting.
Justify the implementation and use of a selected technology in a health care setting.
Competency 5: Apply professional, scholarly communication to facilitate use of health information and patient care technologies.
Create a clear, well-organized, and professional annotated bibliography that is .
Assessment Annotated Bibliography on Technology in Nursing.docxwrite22
This document provides instructions for Assessment 3, which requires students to write a 4-6 page annotated bibliography on a selected healthcare technology. Students must choose a direct or indirect patient care technology, conduct research using library databases, and select 4 peer-reviewed sources published within the last 5 years. For each source, students must write an annotation that summarizes the article, discusses the technology's impact on patient safety/quality of care, and relevance to nursing practice. The conclusion must tie together the sources and justify implementing the technology based on organizational factors and its impact. Strict formatting guidelines regarding length, references, font, and APA style must be followed.
Your company You are a new Supply Chain Analyst with the ACME.docxhyacinthshackley2629
Your company: You are a new Supply Chain Analyst with the ACME Corporation. We design specialty electronics that are components in larger finished goods such as major appliances, automobiles and industrial equipment. Manufacturing is outsourced to low-cost suppliers due to the significant labor contribution and closeness to electronic component suppliers.
Your product: ACME Corp. designs a leading-edge family of devices branded as “Voice Assistants.” These are add-on boxes that many OEMs are using as plug-and-play devices in a wide variety of Internet-of-Things products. They are also sold directly to consumers as after-market items, but only for IoT devices that were built with our proprietary data-port.
Figure 1: Product line of ACME Corp Voice Assistant IoT Add-on Boxes
Your task: Your Chief Supply Chain Officer (CSCO) is requesting a review of supplier-to-customer processes as related to recent growth in our company and increasing demand for faster responsiveness to customers. One alternative is to decentralize our inventory into regional Distribution Centers; however, our ERP system is currently limited in the data available to make some of these decisions – and the output reports are very antiquated. Starting off the process, the CSCO directed that your Analysis Team use population data to pro-rate our national sales data as a starting point. For this analysis, you are asked to focus only on the flagship product, Voice Assistant IoT Add-on Box, 4GB, SKU #123-456789. The challenge is now yours to complete some computations and interpret the results!
Your data: A detailed report from your ERP system along with secondary data from the U.S. Census Bureau (reference: https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest/data/data-sets.html) is provided. (Note: Sales to Alaska, Hawaii and Puerto Rico are handled by a 3PL provider and therefore are NOT part of this analysis.) The consolidated EXCEL® file has incorporated several tasks already performed by the Analysis Team --- sort, cleanse, inventory optimization, etc. Other tasks remain for your team.
Detailed Requirements: Prepare a formal report summarizing your results and providing recommendations that are supported by facts. The required layout follows:
A. Supply Chain Management:
a. Identify a single key supplier and a single key customer for your product, including a brief description of their product.
b. Identify the proper type of business relationship that your company should have with the supplier and customer from Part A, above, then briefly describe the data that you would share with them.
c. When implementing Supply Chain Management with your #1 key supplier for the first time, create a timeline that lists each of the six SCOR processes in the order that you recommend implementation; include process leader (by job title), primary contact at supplier/customer (by job title), and duration to implement.
d. Briefly describe each of the four enablers of supply chain .
Assessment 1 Written Assignment Developing .docxaryan532920
Assessment 1
Written Assignment :
Developing a Professional Practice Portfolio
TASK RATIONALE / AIM:
According to the Registered Nurse Standards for Practice (2017), to provide safe, effective
nursing care, nurses must maintain capability for practice through lifelong learning and
professional development (Nursing and Midwifery Board of Australia [NMBA], 2017).
This assessment is designed to provide you with the understanding and skills required to
develop a professional practice portfolio which can evidence your capability for practice as a
Registered Nurse.
TASK INSTRUCTIONS:
This task comprises three components.
1. Professional practice portfolio use
Professional practice portfolios are asserted to be beneficial to demonstrate the capability for
professional nursing practice.
• Describe a professional practice portfolio and the recommended components.
• Present a written argument for the use of a professional practice portfolio to
demonstrate professional nursing practice. This argument should demonstrate critical
thinking and analysis of the issues; include why portfolios should be used and a
discussion of the benefits and challenges of using a professional practice portfolio to
demonstrate capability for professional nursing practice.
• Discuss and differentiate between management and leadership competencies and
describe how development of these competencies could be evidenced in a professional
practice portfolio.
• Support your argument with at least seven scholarly sources from 2011 onwards.
Page 1
2. Professional standards
Standard 3 “Maintains the capability for practice” (NBMA, 2016) includes seven points.
The fourth point states the Registered Nurse (RN) “accepts accountability for decisions,
actions, behaviours and responsibilities inherent in their role” (NMBA, 2016).
• Chose a situation from your clinical placement where you were delegated an action or
responsibility by your RN clinical practice partner or clinical facilitator and describe
this situation. Your description should include five key elements; context of nursing
practice and health care delivery (where this occurred), who was involved, what you
were delegated, how you enacted the delegated action/responsibility and the outcome
of the situation.
• Critically discuss how you demonstrated professional nursing practice, within
your student nurse scope of practice, and reflect upon accountability for your
decisions, actions, behaviours and responsibilities.
• Support your discussion with at least three scholarly sources from 2011 onwards.
Point of clarification:
• The Registered Nurse standards document describes how the seven standards are
interconnected (see Figure 1, NBMA, 2016). Your clinical situation may incorporate a
description of you enacting one or more of the standards e.g. assessment (Standard
4), developing a plan (Standa ...
The document outlines the key components and structure that should be followed when writing a clinical audit report. It provides examples of templates that divide the report into sections including: introduction, methods, results, discussion, conclusions, recommendations, and quality improvement plan. The report aims to be clear, concise, and follow a logical progression by using plain English and structured formatting like IMRAD. Visual aids like tables and graphs should be used where possible to clearly present results.
Application 4Planning for Change, Implementing and EvaluatiGrazynaBroyles24
Application 4:
Planning for Change, Implementing and Evaluating EBP Projects
Evaluating EBP Projects
Many factors influence how successfully an EBP Project is implemented and evaluated. As noted in this week’s Learning Resources, using a translation framework can facilitate effective implementation and the evaluation of outcomes.
As you complete Application 4, revisit the evidence-based practice model or framework you selected for your EBP Project (Application 2
[see attached file]
). How does the model or framework facilitate the evaluation of outcomes? Would another model or framework better meet the needs of your project?
To prepare
for this week’s section of Application 4:
Continue (from this week’s Discussion
[ use the discussion you are currently working on for me]
) to:
Identify an appropriate method for evaluating your outcomes.
Develop new practice guidelines based on the possible results of the evaluation.
Create, if appropriate, new standards of care that would be based on the new practice guidelines.
This paper should be written in APA format with a minimum of 8 scholarly references. All level 1 & 2 headers must be as in the grading rubric (see attached file). The paper must also include an introduction ending with a purpose statement and a conclusion as per APA guidelines. Do not go over the required maximum of 8-page. The Paper must be cited often and throughout.
The full Application 4 is due by
Wednesday 10/31/18 before midgnight
of this week. Instructions for how to prepare for previous sections of this Application have been provided in Weeks 8 and 9
(see attached files on WK8 & WK9 discussions you previously did for me).
To complete: (See attached Grading Rubric)
Write a 4- to 8-page paper that addresses the following:
1)
Planning for EBP Change
(see attached file on WK8 Discussion)
a) Analyze the impact of implementing change in your practice environment, including the factors that need to be considered regarding stakeholders and end users.
b) Summarize the methods you would use to ensure that those are adequately addressed.
2)
Implementing EBP Projects
(see attached file on WK9 Discussion)
a) Identify the desired outcomes of your EBP Project.
b) Describe any macro or micro systems issues that may inhibit implementation and strategies for resolving those issues.
c) Explain how resolving your EBP Project issue will improve quality and patient safety.
3)
Evaluating EBP Projects
(See this week Discussion you are currently working on)
a) Describe evaluation strategies.
b) Formulate new practice guidelines based on the possible results of the evaluation of outcomes.
c) Describe, if appropriate, new standards of care relevant to the new practice guidelines
Required Readings
White, K. M., Dudley-Brown, S., & Terharr, M. F. (2016).
Translation of evidence into nursing and health care practice
(2nd ed.). New York, NY: Springer.
Chapte ...
NR 328 EBP Improving Diagnostic Safety Project.pdfbkbk37
1. The document outlines guidelines for an assignment on improving diagnostic safety through an evidence-based project. It includes sections on defining a clinical question, completing an evidence matrix table summarizing multiple research articles, describing the findings, and concluding.
2. It also discusses the Joint Commission's National Patient Safety Goal around timely reporting of critical test results to improve patient safety and prevent harm from treatment delays. The goal requires hospitals to define critical results and protocols for reporting them to clinicians within an agreed upon timeframe.
3. One study cited used focus groups to examine how education impacts dietary modifications in diabetes patients, finding that education improved compliance with dietary changes.
Technology in Nursing Annotated Bibliography.pdfsdfghj21
This document provides instructions for an annotated bibliography assignment on technology in nursing. Students are asked to write a 4-6 page annotated bibliography identifying 4 peer-reviewed publications that promote the use of a selected technology to enhance quality and safety standards in nursing. The document provides examples of relevant technologies and outlines the required elements of the annotated bibliography, including an introduction, annotations for each source, and a conclusion with recommendations. Guidelines are provided for formatting, length, references, and the scoring rubric.
Part 1 advocacy and policy reform compare and contrast three nuPOLY33
This document provides guidelines for a course reflection assignment in NUR3655. It outlines the purpose, course outcomes, requirements, and grading criteria for a reflective essay where students will:
1) Reflect on course readings, discussions and activities regarding preparedness in specific BSN competencies related to healthcare policy and advocacy.
2) Include a self-assessment of skills, knowledge and abilities gained in three to six pages using examples from the course to support assertions about selected competencies.
3) Conclude by summarizing benefits of pertinent BSN competencies pertaining to evidence-based practice.
The reflection will be graded on introduction, reflection content, conclusion, writing clarity, and APA format.
This document discusses criterion audits and provides guidance on conducting an audit using the NHS Education for Scotland Pharmacy Directorate criterion audit proforma. It defines what a criterion audit is and explains the eight parts of the audit process: choosing a topic, setting criteria and standards, planning, collecting initial data, implementing changes, collecting second data set, analyzing results, and drawing conclusions. Conducting regular criterion audits can improve patient care, support learning and development, and demonstrate commitment to quality assurance. The peer review process provides feedback to further strengthen audit quality and educational impact.
1) Minimum 8 full pages (Follow the 3 x 3 rule minimum three .docxmonicafrancis71118
1) Minimum 8 full pages (
Follow the 3 x 3 rule: minimum three paragraphs per part)
Part 1: Minimum 2 pages
Part 2: Minimum 6 pages
Submit 1 document per part
2)¨******APA norms
All paragraphs must be
narrative
and cited in the text- each paragraphs
Bulleted
responses are not accepted
Dont write in the first person
Dont copy and pase the questions.
Answer the question objectively, do not make introductions to your answers, answer it when you start the paragraph
Submit 1 document per part
3)****************************** It will be verified by Turnitin (
Identify the percentage of exact match of writing with any other resource on the internet and academic sources, including universities and data banks)
********************************It will be verified by SafeAssign (
Identify the percentage of similarity of writing with any other resource on the internet and academic sources, including universities and data banks)
4) Minimum 3 references per part not older than 5 years
5) Identify your answer with the numbers, according to the question. Start your answer on the same line, not the next
Example:
Q 1. Nursing is XXXXX
Q 2. Health is XXXX
6) You must name the files according to the part you are answering:
Example:
Part 1.doc
Part 2.do
__________________________________________________________________________________
Part 1: Ethical
Choose two of the Nine Tenets of the Code of Ethics for Nurses:
I choose:
1. The Environment and Ethical Obligation
Virtues focus on what is good and bad in regard to whom we are to be as moral persons; obligations focus on what is right and wrong or what we are to do as moral agents. Obligations are often specified in terms of principles such as beneficence or doing good; nonmaleficence or doing no harm; justice or treating people fairly; reparations, or making amends for harm; fidelity, and respect for persons. Nurses, in all roles, must create a culture of excellence and maintain practice environments that support nurses and others in the fulfillment of their ethical obligations.
Environmental factors contribute to working conditions and include but are not limited to: clear policies and procedures that set out professional ethical expectations for nurses; uniform knowledge of the Code and associated ethical position statements. Peer pressure can also shape moral expectations within a work group. Many factors contribute to a practice environment that can either present barriers or foster ethical practice and professional fulfillment. These include compensation systems, disciplinary procedures, ethics committees and consulting services, grievance mechanisms that prevent reprisal, health and safety initiatives, organizational processes and structures, performance standards, policies addressing discrimination and incivility position descriptions, and more. Environments constructed for the equita.
Capella University Technology in Nursing Annotated Bibliography.docxstirlingvwriters
This document provides instructions for an annotated bibliography assignment on using technology to enhance quality and safety standards in nursing. Students are asked to select a direct or indirect patient care technology, research peer-reviewed sources on the topic, and write a 4-6 page annotated bibliography summarizing 4 sources. The annotation for each source should discuss the research focus, provide an overview, and analyze the impact on patient safety, quality of care, and relevance to nursing practice. Students must also justify how the selected technology could be implemented in a healthcare setting based on organizational factors.
Electronic Clinical Documentation with Clinical Decision.docxwrite5
This document provides guidance for an annotated bibliography assignment focusing on how technology can enhance quality and safety standards in nursing. Students are instructed to select a patient care technology, conduct research on it, and write a 4-6 page annotated bibliography summarizing and analyzing 4 peer-reviewed sources on how the selected technology impacts patient outcomes, nursing practice, and interdisciplinary teams. The annotated bibliography should justify implementing the technology in healthcare settings based on organizational factors and the technology's effects. Examples of potential topics for the bibliography are provided.
For more course tutorials visit
www.tutorialrank.com
This Tutorial contains 2 Different Proposal
1. Identify the needs that are present within your selected case study.
1. Final Proposal. For your Final Proposal, you will address the concerns presented in your selected case study from Week One and give recommendations for improvement. Utilize one of the following sample proposals to draft your Final Proposal:
o Sample Proposal 1 (Minnesota Department of Public Health and Environment QI Project Proposal, n.d.)
Technology in Nursing Annotated Publications.pdfsdfghj21
This document provides guidance for an annotated bibliography assignment on technology in nursing. Students are instructed to write a 4-6 page annotated bibliography identifying 4 peer-reviewed publications that promote the use of a selected technology to enhance quality and safety standards in nursing. The document provides examples of relevant technology topics and outlines what should be included in the introduction, annotations, conclusion, and recommendation sections. Students are also provided with evaluation criteria relating to competencies around the impact of technology on outcomes, recommending technology use, and scholarly communication.
This document provides instructions for an annotated bibliography assignment on digital clinical documentation in nursing. Students are asked to:
1) Select a patient care technology topic of interest and research it, finding 4 relevant sources published within the last 5 years.
2) Write a 4-6 page annotated bibliography summarizing each source and justifying how the technology could enhance quality and safety.
3) Consider how the technology impacts outcomes, organizational factors for selection, and how it could be implemented in healthcare settings.
The assignment aims to demonstrate competencies in evaluating technologies, making recommendations, and communicating scholarship.
For more classes visit
www.snaptutorial.com
This Tutorial contains 2 Different Proposal
1. Identify the needs that are present within your selected case study.
1. Final Proposal. For your Final Proposal, you will address the concerns presented in your selected case study from Week One and give recommendations for improvement. Utilize one of the following sample proposals to draft your Final Proposal:
Write a 700 to 1,050 word short paper on the importance of health care research in current times. Include your views on health care research and why your feel it is important as it relates to one of the concepts outlined below:
Philippine Edukasyong Pantahanan at Pangkabuhayan (EPP) CurriculumMJDuyan
(𝐓𝐋𝐄 𝟏𝟎𝟎) (𝐋𝐞𝐬𝐬𝐨𝐧 𝟏)-𝐏𝐫𝐞𝐥𝐢𝐦𝐬
𝐃𝐢𝐬𝐜𝐮𝐬𝐬 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐄𝐏𝐏 𝐂𝐮𝐫𝐫𝐢𝐜𝐮𝐥𝐮𝐦 𝐢𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐏𝐡𝐢𝐥𝐢𝐩𝐩𝐢𝐧𝐞𝐬:
- Understand the goals and objectives of the Edukasyong Pantahanan at Pangkabuhayan (EPP) curriculum, recognizing its importance in fostering practical life skills and values among students. Students will also be able to identify the key components and subjects covered, such as agriculture, home economics, industrial arts, and information and communication technology.
𝐄𝐱𝐩𝐥𝐚𝐢𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐍𝐚𝐭𝐮𝐫𝐞 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐒𝐜𝐨𝐩𝐞 𝐨𝐟 𝐚𝐧 𝐄𝐧𝐭𝐫𝐞𝐩𝐫𝐞𝐧𝐞𝐮𝐫:
-Define entrepreneurship, distinguishing it from general business activities by emphasizing its focus on innovation, risk-taking, and value creation. Students will describe the characteristics and traits of successful entrepreneurs, including their roles and responsibilities, and discuss the broader economic and social impacts of entrepreneurial activities on both local and global scales.
Walmart Business+ and Spark Good for Nonprofits.pdfTechSoup
"Learn about all the ways Walmart supports nonprofit organizations.
You will hear from Liz Willett, the Head of Nonprofits, and hear about what Walmart is doing to help nonprofits, including Walmart Business and Spark Good. Walmart Business+ is a new offer for nonprofits that offers discounts and also streamlines nonprofits order and expense tracking, saving time and money.
The webinar may also give some examples on how nonprofits can best leverage Walmart Business+.
The event will cover the following::
Walmart Business + (https://business.walmart.com/plus) is a new shopping experience for nonprofits, schools, and local business customers that connects an exclusive online shopping experience to stores. Benefits include free delivery and shipping, a 'Spend Analytics” feature, special discounts, deals and tax-exempt shopping.
Special TechSoup offer for a free 180 days membership, and up to $150 in discounts on eligible orders.
Spark Good (walmart.com/sparkgood) is a charitable platform that enables nonprofits to receive donations directly from customers and associates.
Answers about how you can do more with Walmart!"
Level 3 NCEA - NZ: A Nation In the Making 1872 - 1900 SML.pptHenry Hollis
The History of NZ 1870-1900.
Making of a Nation.
From the NZ Wars to Liberals,
Richard Seddon, George Grey,
Social Laboratory, New Zealand,
Confiscations, Kotahitanga, Kingitanga, Parliament, Suffrage, Repudiation, Economic Change, Agriculture, Gold Mining, Timber, Flax, Sheep, Dairying,
LAND USE LAND COVER AND NDVI OF MIRZAPUR DISTRICT, UPRAHUL
This Dissertation explores the particular circumstances of Mirzapur, a region located in the
core of India. Mirzapur, with its varied terrains and abundant biodiversity, offers an optimal
environment for investigating the changes in vegetation cover dynamics. Our study utilizes
advanced technologies such as GIS (Geographic Information Systems) and Remote sensing to
analyze the transformations that have taken place over the course of a decade.
The complex relationship between human activities and the environment has been the focus
of extensive research and worry. As the global community grapples with swift urbanization,
population expansion, and economic progress, the effects on natural ecosystems are becoming
more evident. A crucial element of this impact is the alteration of vegetation cover, which plays a
significant role in maintaining the ecological equilibrium of our planet.Land serves as the foundation for all human activities and provides the necessary materials for
these activities. As the most crucial natural resource, its utilization by humans results in different
'Land uses,' which are determined by both human activities and the physical characteristics of the
land.
The utilization of land is impacted by human needs and environmental factors. In countries
like India, rapid population growth and the emphasis on extensive resource exploitation can lead
to significant land degradation, adversely affecting the region's land cover.
Therefore, human intervention has significantly influenced land use patterns over many
centuries, evolving its structure over time and space. In the present era, these changes have
accelerated due to factors such as agriculture and urbanization. Information regarding land use and
cover is essential for various planning and management tasks related to the Earth's surface,
providing crucial environmental data for scientific, resource management, policy purposes, and
diverse human activities.
Accurate understanding of land use and cover is imperative for the development planning
of any area. Consequently, a wide range of professionals, including earth system scientists, land
and water managers, and urban planners, are interested in obtaining data on land use and cover
changes, conversion trends, and other related patterns. The spatial dimensions of land use and
cover support policymakers and scientists in making well-informed decisions, as alterations in
these patterns indicate shifts in economic and social conditions. Monitoring such changes with the
help of Advanced technologies like Remote Sensing and Geographic Information Systems is
crucial for coordinated efforts across different administrative levels. Advanced technologies like
Remote Sensing and Geographic Information Systems
9
Changes in vegetation cover refer to variations in the distribution, composition, and overall
structure of plant communities across different temporal and spatial scales. These changes can
occur natural.
How to Make a Field Mandatory in Odoo 17Celine George
In Odoo, making a field required can be done through both Python code and XML views. When you set the required attribute to True in Python code, it makes the field required across all views where it's used. Conversely, when you set the required attribute in XML views, it makes the field required only in the context of that particular view.
How to Setup Warehouse & Location in Odoo 17 InventoryCeline George
In this slide, we'll explore how to set up warehouses and locations in Odoo 17 Inventory. This will help us manage our stock effectively, track inventory levels, and streamline warehouse operations.
ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 42001, and GDPR: Best Practices for Implementation and...PECB
Denis is a dynamic and results-driven Chief Information Officer (CIO) with a distinguished career spanning information systems analysis and technical project management. With a proven track record of spearheading the design and delivery of cutting-edge Information Management solutions, he has consistently elevated business operations, streamlined reporting functions, and maximized process efficiency.
Certified as an ISO/IEC 27001: Information Security Management Systems (ISMS) Lead Implementer, Data Protection Officer, and Cyber Risks Analyst, Denis brings a heightened focus on data security, privacy, and cyber resilience to every endeavor.
His expertise extends across a diverse spectrum of reporting, database, and web development applications, underpinned by an exceptional grasp of data storage and virtualization technologies. His proficiency in application testing, database administration, and data cleansing ensures seamless execution of complex projects.
What sets Denis apart is his comprehensive understanding of Business and Systems Analysis technologies, honed through involvement in all phases of the Software Development Lifecycle (SDLC). From meticulous requirements gathering to precise analysis, innovative design, rigorous development, thorough testing, and successful implementation, he has consistently delivered exceptional results.
Throughout his career, he has taken on multifaceted roles, from leading technical project management teams to owning solutions that drive operational excellence. His conscientious and proactive approach is unwavering, whether he is working independently or collaboratively within a team. His ability to connect with colleagues on a personal level underscores his commitment to fostering a harmonious and productive workplace environment.
Date: May 29, 2024
Tags: Information Security, ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 42001, Artificial Intelligence, GDPR
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Find out more about ISO training and certification services
Training: ISO/IEC 27001 Information Security Management System - EN | PECB
ISO/IEC 42001 Artificial Intelligence Management System - EN | PECB
General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) - Training Courses - EN | PECB
Webinars: https://pecb.com/webinars
Article: https://pecb.com/article
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For more information about PECB:
Website: https://pecb.com/
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/pecb/
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/PECBInternational/
Slideshare: http://www.slideshare.net/PECBCERTIFICATION
Beyond Degrees - Empowering the Workforce in the Context of Skills-First.pptxEduSkills OECD
Iván Bornacelly, Policy Analyst at the OECD Centre for Skills, OECD, presents at the webinar 'Tackling job market gaps with a skills-first approach' on 12 June 2024
1. 1
3806NRS: Professional Nursing Practice
3806NRS Professional Nursing
Practice Trimester 1, 2020
Assessment Item 2
Written Assignment (Individual):
Quality and Safety
2,000 words
Weighting 50%
Due Date: Tuesday 5th May 2020 at
17:00hrs
TASK RATIONALE / AIM:
The Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care (ACSQHC) leads
and coordinates national improvements in safety and quality in health care. It has
developed a framework for safe and high quality care with three core principles – that
care is consumer centred, driven by information, and organised for safety (ACSQHC,
2010).
In addition to this framework, ACSQHC have developed National Safety and Quality
Health Service (NSQHS) Standards to ‘protect the public from harm and to improve
the quality of health service provision’ (ACSQHC, 2017, p. 5). The Registered Nurse
is integral to every standard that has been developed by the ACSQHC.
This assessment is designed to enable you to demonstrate an understanding of
quality and safety in health care through the critical discussion of one of the National
Safety and Quality Health Service Standards.
This assessment will address learning outcome 2.
TASK INSTRUCTIONS:
This task requires you to write a 2,000-word assignment. Before you write your
assignment, you will need to:
• Choose one of the following National Safety and Quality Health Service
(NSQHS) Standards (ACSQHC, 2017) as the topic of your assignment.
• Clinical governance (Standard 1)
• Partnering with consumers (Standard 2)
• Preventing and controlling healthcare-associated infection (Standard 3)
• Medication safety (Standard 4)
• Comprehensive care (Standard 5)
• Communicating for safety (Standard 6)
• Blood management (Standard 7)
Please note the following NSQHS standard is not included as topic choice.
• Recognising and responding to acute deterioration (Standard 8).
2. 2
3806NRS: Professional Nursing Practice
• Identify the type of process and outcome data that could be collected, analysed
and fed back for improvements in care relevant to your chosen standard. (You
may wish to refer to the article by Donabedian, 1988, as a starting point). This
area for action aligns with step 2.2 of the Australian Safety and Quality
Framework for Health Care (ACSQHC, 2010).
• Research the topic of quality and safety in health care in Australia then
identify and analyse scholarly literature that is relevant to your assignment
topic, namelyyour:
• chosen standard,
• a clinical care activity relevant to this standard,
• process and outcome data required to monitor outcomes/improvements
relevant to the standard.
• Following these steps, write your assignment. Your assignment should include:
1. An introduction or first paragraph that clearly introduces the topic, identifies
the NSQHS standard (from the allocated options), outlines what will be
covered in the assignment and provides a thesis statement (what to expect
in theassignment).
2. A critical discussion of quality and safety in the Australian health care
system, supported by scholarly literature (at least five sources
published after2015).
3. A critical discussion of a clinical care activity relevant to your chosen
standard, including the risks or impact of low quality care and how it can be
improved. Discussion is supported by scholarly literature (at least five
sources published after 2015).
4. A critical discussion of how process and outcome data could be collected,
analysed and fed back for improvements in clinical care. Discussion is
supported by scholarly literature (at least five sources published after 2015.
However, you are allowed to use Donabedian’s (1988) article in this section).
5. A conclusion which summarises your argument without introducing
any newinformation.
References:
Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care (ACSQHC). (2010).
Australian safety and quality framework for health care. Retrieved from
https://www.safetyandquality.gov.au/sites/default/files/migrated/Australian-
SandQ-Framework1.pdf
Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care (ACSQHC). (2017).
National safety and quality health service standards (2nd ed.). Sydney,
Aust.: Author.
Retrieved from https://www.safetyandquality.gov.au/our-work/assessment-
to-the- nsqhs-standards/
Donabedian, A. (1988). The quality of care: How can it be assessed? JAMA, 260(12), 1743-
1748. doi:10.1001/jama.1988.03410120089033
3. 3
3806NRS: Professional Nursing Practice
OTHER ELEMENTS:
• Always refer to the Griffith Health Writing and Referencing Guide
• Provide one reference list at the end of your written assignment which presents at
least 15 references from scholarly literature in alphabetical order.
• State your word count (excluding your reference list) on the AssignmentCoversheet.
• Do not exceed 2,000 words. Words over 2,000 will not be marked.
• Submit your DRAFT assignment via Turnitin as per the instructions
on your Learning@Griffith course site. [Submit in the ‘Assessment’
tab].
• Examine the Turnitin report for your draft assignment. If you have text-
matching identified in the written section of the assignment, this may be
used as the basis of reporting an academic integrity concern.
• Submit your FINAL assignment via Turnitin as per the instructions on your
Learning@Griffith course site. [Submit in the ‘Assessment’ tab]. Keep your
Turnitin receipt as evidence of successful submission. Check you have
submitted the correct assignment file.
• Email yourself a copy of your final assignment file so you have a
contemporaneous record of your submission.
4. 4
3806NRS: Professional Nursing Practice
MARKING CRITERIA
A2 Quality and Safety
POSSIBLE
MARKS
1. Introduction (Approx 250 words)
• The first paragraph clearly introduces the topic, identifies the NSQHS
standard (from the allocated options), outlines what will be covered inthe
assignment and provides a thesis statement (what to expect in the
assignment).
5
2. Quality and Safety in the Australian health care system (Approx 500 words)
• Critically discusses quality and safety in the Australian health caresystem.
• The explanation demonstrates critical thinking and analysis of theissues;
e.g. why quality and safety are important considerations and how these are
addressed as part of the core business of health care organisations.
10
3. Clinical care activity (Approx 500 words)
• Identifies and critically discusses a clinical care activity central to thechosen
NSQHS standard.
• The discussion demonstrates critical thinking and analysis of the issues;e.g.
the risks or impact of low quality care and how quality can beimproved.
10
4. Driven by information (Approx 500 words)
• Defines process and outcome data and provides examples of each.
• Critically discusses how process and outcome data could be collected,
analysed and fed back for improvements in clinical care. The discussion
demonstrates critical thinking and analysis of the issues.
10
5. Conclusion (Approx 250 words)
• Summarises the argument without introducing any new information. 5
5. 5
3806NRS: Professional Nursing Practice
6. Evidence and referencing
• Demonstrates ability to apply research concepts and principles such as use
of databases, critique of quality, relevant and up to dateliterature.
• Discussion is supported by at least 15 relevant, high quality,evidence-
based, scholarly sources from 2015 onwards. However, you are
allowed to use Donabedian’s (1988) in this section.
• Referencing (in-text citations and reference list entries) as perAPA
Referencing Guidelines (APA Style 7th
Edition).
• Provides at least 15 references from scholarly literature, in
alphabetical order, in onelist which starts on a separate page.
5
7. Academic writing and presentation
• Assignment is well presented, with correct spelling, grammar,
well-constructed sentences and appropriate paragraph structures.
• Uses academic language throughout.
• Conforms to the Assignment Presentation Formatting Guidelines.
• Meets the 2,000-word length requirements (excluding reference list).
5
Total marks 50