Human Learning
                        Topic 9: Avoidance




CEDP503    Ryan Sain, Ph.D.     1            3/30/2012
Discriminated Avoidance
 A warning signal is given

 A response prevents or removes the stimulus

 Escape trials
    Organism makes response to ‘remove’ stimulus
    Happens early in training
 Avoidance trials
    Organism makes response to avoid stimulus
Two process theory
 What do you ‘get’ in avoidance?
    Actually nothing
    ‘nothing’ cant cause something
 Two process theory
    Explains most of avoidance behavior
    Is the standard
    Is not perfect
More two-process
 Classical conditioning
    CS paired with US  fear
    motivation
 Operant conditioning
    Reduction of fear is a negative reinforcer
    Terminating the CS  reducing fear
What is learned?
 Escape from conditioned fear
    This maintains the behavior
 Prevention of shock
    Is the by-product or outcome of the behavior
    This does not control the response
Acquired drive
 Experimental paradigm

 Separate CC and OC components

 Produce conditioned fear
    CS  US
 Expose CS and permit termination of it
    Organisms learn to make the response
Extinction of avoidance
 Avoiding a stimulus
    Breaking the CS-US connection of fear
    But the response persists dramatically
 How to extinguish?
    Flooding
         Present the CS without the US
         Do not allow the avoidance response
    Response blocking
         Prevent response that terminates the CS
         No CS US pairings
         Failure to make the avoidance response  no shock
Free operant avoidance
 No warning signal

 Two process theory does not explain this

 Organisms still learn to make the response

 Humans
    CO2 administrations for 20 seconds
    Pull a plunger prevents this
    No instructions provided

324 09 avoidance

  • 1.
    Human Learning Topic 9: Avoidance CEDP503 Ryan Sain, Ph.D. 1 3/30/2012
  • 2.
    Discriminated Avoidance  Awarning signal is given  A response prevents or removes the stimulus  Escape trials  Organism makes response to ‘remove’ stimulus  Happens early in training  Avoidance trials  Organism makes response to avoid stimulus
  • 3.
    Two process theory What do you ‘get’ in avoidance?  Actually nothing  ‘nothing’ cant cause something  Two process theory  Explains most of avoidance behavior  Is the standard  Is not perfect
  • 4.
    More two-process  Classicalconditioning  CS paired with US  fear  motivation  Operant conditioning  Reduction of fear is a negative reinforcer  Terminating the CS  reducing fear
  • 5.
    What is learned? Escape from conditioned fear  This maintains the behavior  Prevention of shock  Is the by-product or outcome of the behavior  This does not control the response
  • 6.
    Acquired drive  Experimentalparadigm  Separate CC and OC components  Produce conditioned fear  CS  US  Expose CS and permit termination of it  Organisms learn to make the response
  • 7.
    Extinction of avoidance Avoiding a stimulus  Breaking the CS-US connection of fear  But the response persists dramatically  How to extinguish?  Flooding  Present the CS without the US  Do not allow the avoidance response  Response blocking  Prevent response that terminates the CS  No CS US pairings  Failure to make the avoidance response  no shock
  • 8.
    Free operant avoidance No warning signal  Two process theory does not explain this  Organisms still learn to make the response  Humans  CO2 administrations for 20 seconds  Pull a plunger prevents this  No instructions provided