Human Learning
                Topic 9: Observational Learning




CEDP324   Ryan Sain, Ph.D.     1                  3/30/2012
Observational Learning
 Change in behavior due to the experience of
  observing a model
 Observation and classical conditioning
     Confederate and observer
           Confederate receives shock after a buzzer sounds
            (acting) – observer watches
           Observer later showed conditioning to the buzzer
     Eyelid conditioning
           Observer watched conditioning trials – they eventually
            produced a CR to the CS

CEDP324      Ryan Sain, Ph.D.      2                           3/30/2012
Observational learning -
        classical
 Alternate explanation
    Maybe watching a blink is a CS for blinking
           Tone paired with the sight – now produces the blink
    Might be higher order conditioning




CEDP324      Ryan Sain, Ph.D.      3                         3/30/2012
Observational learning -
        classical
 Monkeys reared in captivity with wild
  parents
     Parents show fear of snakes – subjects do not
     Subjects will reach across a snake for food in the
      same compartment
           Then have them watch a parent in the presence of a
            snake
           The subjects then show fear of snakes.



CEDP324     Ryan Sain, Ph.D.     4                        3/30/2012
Observational Learning -
        operant
 Monkey learned to do a task to receive SR
  (pull a chain)
 An observer watched the model perform the
  task 5 times
     Observers given six trials
     Observers benefitted
              Many responded correctly on 1st trial
              75% of solutions 30s
              47% in 10s
              Failures were close to correct

CEDP324       Ryan Sain, Ph.D.        5                3/30/2012
Observational Learning -
        Operant
 Cats solving a problem
     Spin a disk to receive SR
     4 Watched while one worked
           Two watched for the full 30 trials
           Two watched for the last 15 trials
     Observers OUTPERFORMED the models
           Models – 62s to solve trial 1
           Observers 15 trials – 57s to solve on trial 1
           Observers 30 trials – 16s to solve on trial 1

CEDP324      Ryan Sain, Ph.D.       6                       3/30/2012
Imitation and generalized
         imitation
 Observer duplicates the behavior of a model
 Imitation of a behavior may not lead to the
  consequence (contingency)

 Must immediately follow

 Must look similar

 Model must be the Sd for the behavior




CEDP324   Ryan Sain, Ph.D.   7                  3/30/2012
Generalized Imitation
 Generalized imitation (getting SR for imitating in
  general)
     Baer and Sherman - Sr imitative behavior
           Puppet modeled 4 behaviors (mouthing, head
            nodding, speaking nonsense and lever pressing)
           First three when imitated resulted in positive feedback
            from the puppet
                   Imitation of the lever press was never reinforced
                   All imitating increased
           Reinforced the general tendency to imitate



CEDP324      Ryan Sain, Ph.D.            8                              3/30/2012
Variables effecting
          observational learning
 Consequences of a model’s behavior
     Consistency is important
 Consequences of the observers behavior
     Learning history
     Have you been reinforced for observing/imitating in the
      past
 Model characteristics influence learning
     Attractive
     Competent – fellow student vs. lab assistant – learned
      more from the assistant
     Likable
     Prestigious

CEDP324    Ryan Sain, Ph.D.      9                         3/30/2012
other characteristics
 Attention getting
     The eye patch
     The mood
 Age
     Young ones don’t necessarily learn more than older
              Recalling what you saw (novel performances of a model)–
               adults were much better
 Survival
     Polar bears and the Inuit – dangle seals
     So observing (and imitating) can increase survivability

CEDP324       Ryan Sain, Ph.D.      10                            3/30/2012
Bandura
 Social Cognitive Theory

 4 processes
     Attentional
     Retentional
     Motor reproductive processes
           Overt or covert
     Motivational processes
           Must be value

CEDP324     Ryan Sain, Ph.D.      11     3/30/2012
Problems with Bandura
 Only applies to humans
     Other critters display observational learning
 Assumes the processes
     No direct observation
 Cannot separate experience from motivation, etc.




CEDP324   Ryan Sain, Ph.D.     12                     3/30/2012
Miller-Dollard
 Reinforcement history

 The consequence of the observer is what is important

 Model does a behavior

 Observer imitates
     They are reinforced for the imitating
 Doesn’t explain imitating other non trained models
     A case of generalization

CEDP324   Ryan Sain, Ph.D.    13                   3/30/2012
Foraging
 Imitating behavior to find food

 Half and Half tubs
     Some birds open them / some don’t
     Group 1 - 5 trials of observation
     Group 2 – 5 trials without observation (practice)
     Group one opened the tubs later, group 2 did not
 Cats and rats


CEDP324   Ryan Sain, Ph.D.      14                        3/30/2012
TV
 The Bobo doll experiment

 Rocky the selfish child experiment

 Crime on tv leads to crime
     Strong experimental support
     Hard to test in the lab
     Not everyone imitates what they see



CEDP324   Ryan Sain, Ph.D.      15          3/30/2012

324 10 observational learning

  • 1.
    Human Learning Topic 9: Observational Learning CEDP324 Ryan Sain, Ph.D. 1 3/30/2012
  • 2.
    Observational Learning  Changein behavior due to the experience of observing a model  Observation and classical conditioning  Confederate and observer  Confederate receives shock after a buzzer sounds (acting) – observer watches  Observer later showed conditioning to the buzzer  Eyelid conditioning  Observer watched conditioning trials – they eventually produced a CR to the CS CEDP324 Ryan Sain, Ph.D. 2 3/30/2012
  • 3.
    Observational learning - classical  Alternate explanation  Maybe watching a blink is a CS for blinking  Tone paired with the sight – now produces the blink  Might be higher order conditioning CEDP324 Ryan Sain, Ph.D. 3 3/30/2012
  • 4.
    Observational learning - classical  Monkeys reared in captivity with wild parents  Parents show fear of snakes – subjects do not  Subjects will reach across a snake for food in the same compartment  Then have them watch a parent in the presence of a snake  The subjects then show fear of snakes. CEDP324 Ryan Sain, Ph.D. 4 3/30/2012
  • 5.
    Observational Learning - operant  Monkey learned to do a task to receive SR (pull a chain)  An observer watched the model perform the task 5 times  Observers given six trials  Observers benefitted  Many responded correctly on 1st trial  75% of solutions 30s  47% in 10s  Failures were close to correct CEDP324 Ryan Sain, Ph.D. 5 3/30/2012
  • 6.
    Observational Learning - Operant  Cats solving a problem  Spin a disk to receive SR  4 Watched while one worked  Two watched for the full 30 trials  Two watched for the last 15 trials  Observers OUTPERFORMED the models  Models – 62s to solve trial 1  Observers 15 trials – 57s to solve on trial 1  Observers 30 trials – 16s to solve on trial 1 CEDP324 Ryan Sain, Ph.D. 6 3/30/2012
  • 7.
    Imitation and generalized imitation  Observer duplicates the behavior of a model  Imitation of a behavior may not lead to the consequence (contingency)  Must immediately follow  Must look similar  Model must be the Sd for the behavior CEDP324 Ryan Sain, Ph.D. 7 3/30/2012
  • 8.
    Generalized Imitation  Generalizedimitation (getting SR for imitating in general)  Baer and Sherman - Sr imitative behavior  Puppet modeled 4 behaviors (mouthing, head nodding, speaking nonsense and lever pressing)  First three when imitated resulted in positive feedback from the puppet  Imitation of the lever press was never reinforced  All imitating increased  Reinforced the general tendency to imitate CEDP324 Ryan Sain, Ph.D. 8 3/30/2012
  • 9.
    Variables effecting observational learning  Consequences of a model’s behavior  Consistency is important  Consequences of the observers behavior  Learning history  Have you been reinforced for observing/imitating in the past  Model characteristics influence learning  Attractive  Competent – fellow student vs. lab assistant – learned more from the assistant  Likable  Prestigious CEDP324 Ryan Sain, Ph.D. 9 3/30/2012
  • 10.
    other characteristics  Attentiongetting  The eye patch  The mood  Age  Young ones don’t necessarily learn more than older  Recalling what you saw (novel performances of a model)– adults were much better  Survival  Polar bears and the Inuit – dangle seals  So observing (and imitating) can increase survivability CEDP324 Ryan Sain, Ph.D. 10 3/30/2012
  • 11.
    Bandura  Social CognitiveTheory  4 processes  Attentional  Retentional  Motor reproductive processes  Overt or covert  Motivational processes  Must be value CEDP324 Ryan Sain, Ph.D. 11 3/30/2012
  • 12.
    Problems with Bandura Only applies to humans  Other critters display observational learning  Assumes the processes  No direct observation  Cannot separate experience from motivation, etc. CEDP324 Ryan Sain, Ph.D. 12 3/30/2012
  • 13.
    Miller-Dollard  Reinforcement history The consequence of the observer is what is important  Model does a behavior  Observer imitates  They are reinforced for the imitating  Doesn’t explain imitating other non trained models  A case of generalization CEDP324 Ryan Sain, Ph.D. 13 3/30/2012
  • 14.
    Foraging  Imitating behaviorto find food  Half and Half tubs  Some birds open them / some don’t  Group 1 - 5 trials of observation  Group 2 – 5 trials without observation (practice)  Group one opened the tubs later, group 2 did not  Cats and rats CEDP324 Ryan Sain, Ph.D. 14 3/30/2012
  • 15.
    TV  The Bobodoll experiment  Rocky the selfish child experiment  Crime on tv leads to crime  Strong experimental support  Hard to test in the lab  Not everyone imitates what they see CEDP324 Ryan Sain, Ph.D. 15 3/30/2012