hpmp status and trends in selected article 5 and ceit countreis
•
1 like•351 views
The document discusses HCFC phase-out projects and HPMPs in several CIS countries. It provides details on approved HPMPs for Armenia, Kyrgyzstan, Georgia, and Moldova funded by the Multilateral Fund. It also discusses completed GEF-funded HCFC surveys and phase-out strategies in Bulgaria, Belarus, Tajikistan, Uzbekistan, and Ukraine. Key challenges around HCFC consumption include licensing and reporting systems, refrigeration servicing capacity, and developing appropriate phase-out strategies.
Recommended
More Related Content
Viewers also liked
Viewers also liked (20)
More from UNEP OzonAction
More from UNEP OzonAction (20)
Recently uploaded
Recently uploaded (20)
hpmp status and trends in selected article 5 and ceit countreis
- 1. HCFC Phase Out Strategies and HPMPs in Selected CIS Countries ECA Ozone Network Meeting May 10-13, 2011, Belgrade, Serbia
- 2. HCFC Phase Out Projects in the CIS MLF Funded HPMPs (all approved at 62nd and 63rd ExCom Meetings) Armenia – HPMP approved (Stage 1 – 2015) – UNDP/UNEP Servicing sector; Refrigeration manufacturing sector Kyrgyzstan – HPMP approved (Stage 1 – 2015) – UNDP/UNEP Servicing sector; Foam sector (self-converted) Georgia – HPMP approved (Stage 1 – 2020) - UNDP Servicing sector; Solvents sector Moldova – HPMP approved (Stage 1 – 2015) - UNDP Servicing sector
- 3. HCFC Phase Out Projects in the CIS GEF Funded HCFC Survey and Phase-out Strategies (all completed): Bulgaria Belarus (servicing, solvents, foams) Tajikistan (servicing) Uzbekistan (servicing) Ukraine (servicing, solvents, foams) UNDP is formulating HPMP technical assistance packages (regional project) for Belarus, Ukraine, Tajikistan and Uzbekistan – July 2011
- 4. Distribution of HCFC Consumption Country Consumption Servicing Manufacturing (ODP t) Tajikistan 3.6 100% - Kyrgyzstan 4.0 62% 38% Armenia 6.8 79% 21% Belarus 5.8 63% 37% Bulgaria 3.7 100% -
- 5. Manufacturing Sectors Uzbekistan Kyrgyzstan Armenia Ukraine Belarus Sector Commercial Refrigeration X X X X Equipment X X X Assembly/Filling Solvent X X Foam (Mixed On-Site) X X Foam (Imported Fully X X X X X Formulated)
- 6. Servicing Consumption by Sectors Tajikistan Sector Kyrgyzstan Kyrgyzstan Armenia Bulgaria Belarus Industrial 11% 26% 15% 22% 2% Commercial 9% 29% 18% 20% 61% Transport 1% 7% 7% 5% - Air Conditioning >5 KW 14% 5% 10% 11% 4% Air Conditioning <5 KW 65% 35% 50% 42% 33%
- 7. Alternative Refrigerant Use Tajikistan: A/C & Refrigeration - 95% HCFCs, minimal adoption of HFCs, some use of ammonia Kyrgyzstan: A/C -95% HCFC, Refrigeration – 65% HCFC, Transport – 85% HCFC Armenia: A/C -95% HCFC, Industrial Ref – 65% HCFC, 30% Ammonia, 5% HFC, Commercial – 45% HCFC, 65% HFC, Transport – 75% HCFC, 25% HFC Belarus: Overall 50% HCFC, 50% HFC Bulgaria: Overall 30% HCFC, 70% HFC Regionally: Outside of domestic and large industrial refrigeration minimal introduction of new natural refrigerant technology
- 8. Licensing/Reporting No production/negligible reported export All license HCFC imports Only Belarus/Ukraine license HCFC equipment/products Licensing systems vary in application and are relatively new in some cases Official import data generally underestimates consumption Issues: Custom/regulatory capacity (training, equipment, staff turn over) Coordination between Environmental/Customs authorities Inconsistency in what is reported (actual transactions or annual quota) Impact of customs union Illegal trade
- 9. Refrigeration Servicing Capacity Issues State of refrigeration servicing variable Generally matured as a sustainable business in larger Non- article 5 countries, viable but fragmented in Article 5 countries Capacity deficits in all countries respecting modern refrigerant management practices particularly Article 5 countries and non-article 5 countries in Central Asia. One time training generally expired Aging personal/limited new entry training available Prevalence of informal service providers High leakage rates for HCFCs Lack of basic charging equipment/tools & poor maintenance
- 10. Phase Out Strategies/Action -CIS Countries Regulatory Action Import quotas per compliance targets Licensing/Import controls on HCFC equipment Strengthening capacity Customs/environmental enforcement Refrigeration servicing Require sustainable mechanisms to maintain Investment Manufacturing phase out where possible (at best a temporary fix) Retrofit/replacement incentives (natural refrigerant introduction through demonstration) Sustainable refrigerant management systems (including ODS waste accumulation and storage)
- 11. Conclusions Key issue is capacity to stabilize/reduce servicing demand, and sustain it. Action required to reduce/eliminate supply HCFC equipment HCFC phase out in CIS ultimately driven by global market forces.