The document discusses several topics related to employment law, including sexual harassment, recent changes to injury claims processes, and privacy/data security risks for employers. It notes that the #MeToo movement in late 2017 brought increased attention to issues of sexual harassment and assault. It also outlines recent reductions in Ohio workers' compensation premiums and claim filing timelines. Additionally, it discusses various privacy and data security risks for remote workforces, including payroll vendor spoofing, tax and W-2 theft, use of personal devices and applications, and compliance with the new GDPR regulations in Europe.
4. z
Harvey
Weinstein
Kevin Spacey Louis CK Bill O’Reilly Roger Ailes
Charlie Rose
Mother
Theresa
Al Franken Roy Moore
Garrison
Keiler
Russell
Simmons
Pete Rose Bill Cosby
Oprah
Winfrey
10. z
Deductions
for Employee
Awards
Taxation of
Reimbursement
for Employee
Moving
Expenses
Elimination of
Deductions for
Employee
Meal Expenses
Elimination of
Deductions for
Parking + Paid
Transportation
Elimination of
Deductions for
On-Site Gyms
New Provisions:
19. 19
Top 10 OSHA Violations FY17
• Fall Protection
• Hazard Communication
• Scaffolding
• Respiratory Protection
• LOTO
• Ladders
• PIV
• Guarding
• Fall Protection, Training
• Electrical
20. 20
Fall Protection – General Requirements (1926.501)
• #1 OSHA violation of 2017
– 6,887 violations
• The most common violation requirements come from:
– Unprotected edges and open sides
– Failure to provide fall protection on low slope roofs
21. 21
Hazard Communication (1910.1200)
Hazard Communication Program
Not having or maintaining a hazard
communication program– 1520 citations.
1910.1200(e)(1)
SDS
Making SDS’s available at each shift– 459
citation. 1910.1200(g)(8)
Training
Improper information and training given to
employees– 1,230 citations 1910.1200(h)(1)
Keeping Up To Date
Keeping SDS book up to date with incoming
and produced hazards– 337 citations
1910.1200 (g)(1)
4,652 violations in the 2017 year
22. 22
Scaffolding (1926.451)
• Most common citations result from:
3,697 Violations
Improper
platforms
Improper
access to
surfaces
Lack of fall
protection
23. 23
Scaffolding (1926.451)
Proper Set Up
Falling Access Platforms
Employees on a
scaffold 10+ feet
above a lower
level shall be
protected from
falling to that
lower level
Support
On scaffold
platforms more
than 2 feet
above or below a
point of access,
Crossbraces
shall not be used
as a means of
access
Each platform on
all working levels
shall be fully
planked or
decked between
the front uprights
and guardrail
supported
Supported
scaffold poles,
legs, posts,
frames and
uprights shall
bear on base
plates, mud sills,
or other
adequate firm
foundation
24. 24
Respiratory Protection (1910.134)
• Providing medical evaluation – 605 citations
• Written respiratory protection program – 494 citations
• Fit testing – 277 citations
• Providing respirators – 239 citations
3,381 Violations
27. 27
Powered Industrial Trucks (1910.178)
• OSHA statistics indicate there are roughly 85 forklift fatalities and ~35,000 serious injuries.
• OSHA’s most common findings and most cited sections of the standard are:
– Inadequate training of employees
– Lack of truck inspections
2,349 Violations
29. 29
Machine Guarding (1910.212)
• The exposure to unguarded or poorly guarded machines is prevalent in many workplaces.
• Moving machine parts have to potential to cause injuries such as
– Crushed fingers or hands
– Amputations
– Burns
– Blindness
2,109 Violations
41. 41
Safety 101
Written Safety Programs
Communication
is key
Ongoing training
Routine hazard
recognition
Positive Culture
42. 42
Contact us
Central Ohio’s Business Health, Safety and
Environmental Consultants since 1992.
140 N. Otterbein Ave.
Westerville, Ohio 43081
614.890.0800
facebook.com/safex.us
Linkedin.com/company/safex-inc
dgroteadams@safex.us
47. z
OLD RULE
NEW RULE
Parties had 60 days to file an appeal into
Court on “right to participate” issues
If the parties agree, there is a mechanism
to extend the deadline from 60 days to
150 days before an appeal is due so that
the matter can be settled
48. z
REMEMBER
30 days to file Notice of Intent to
Settle
Other party has 14 days to file
Objection to Notice of Intent
If no Objection, then 150 days to file
appeal into Court
49. z
OLD RULE
NEW RULE
Statute listed various drugs + levels of
intoxication for purposes of the
“rebuttable presumption” (that drug use
caused the injury) to apply
List is eliminated and in its place, general
Federal Guidelines now apply with regard
to intoxication levels
50. z
REMEMBER
Still need to have “reasonable
suspicion” to use rebuttable
presumption
Ohio’s new Medical Marijuana laws
don’t change things related to
employment or workers’ comp
51. z
OLD RULE
NEW RULE
In the case of incarceration,
compensation was denied only
to an incarcerated claimant
Neither an incarcerated claimant nor an
incarcerated dependent is entitled to
compensation
52. z
OLD RULE
NEW RULE
If a claimant was successful in Court on a
“right to participate” issue, his/her
attorney was entitled to attorneys’ fees,
capped at $4,200
The cap has been increased to $5,000
53. z
OLD RULE
NEW RULE
Firefighters are not entitled to “wage loss”
compensation in a cancer claim
Firefighters, who previously were not
entitled to “wage loss” compensation in
an allowed cancer claim, are now eligible
for such compensation
58. z
State, ex rel.
Presbyterian
Retirement
Services v.
Indus. Comm.
2017-Ohio-
7577
Claimant receiving permanent total
disability compensation (PTD) cannot
also be granted awards for permanent
partial disability (PPD or C-92)
59. z
Clendenin v.
Girl Scouts of
Western Ohio
2017-Ohio-
2830
No “regular” court appeal –
must pursue Writ of
Mandamus in Court of
Appeals
Industrial Commission decision that a
substantially aggravated pre-existing
condition has returned to “preinjury baseline
status” is an “extent of disability” issue
60. z
Ferguson v.
State
2017-Ohio-
7844
Court of Appeals
agreed but Ohio
Supreme Court upheld
the law
Claimant cannot
dismiss an employer’s
court appeal without
the employer’s
stipulated consent
Plaintiff argued the
2006 legislation
violated Ohio
Constitution
97. z
#1
Tax + W-2 Theft
Use of social
engineering coupled
with spear fishing is
increasing
Impacts employers
each year, and this is
the peak season
W-2s are information
rich documents
98. z
#1
Tax + W-2 Theft
Bad actors may use the information to
submit fraudulent tax returns in the
hope of defrauding the IRS into sending
funds for a false tax refund or sell on
dark web to identity thieves
KEY RISK
103. z
#2
Payroll Vendor Spoofing
Message sent to
employees spoofing a
trusted vendor +
prompts to click
Directs employee to
“confirm identity” by
providing credentials
Some even have reply
feature to email the
employee
104. z
#2
Payroll Vendor Spoofing
Bad actors may use the information to
divert payments to divert funds - to the
extent credentials are similar or the
same, bad actor may gain access to
company systems
KEY RISK
106. z
Instruct employees
not to supply login
credentials
Do not publicly
post information
your employees
need to access tax
information
Enable 2-factor
authentication
107. z
#3
Remote Workforce
Use of unapproved
apps and devices
Accessing unsecure
Wi-Fi networks
Ignoring security
updates
115. z
#5
GDPR for Employers
New EU data
protection regulation
as of 5/25/18
Applies to any
organization that
offers goods or
services to EU data
subjects
Personal data is
defined broadly
116. z
#5
GDPR for Employers
Processing
information requires
a legal basis
Employees should
receive effective
information about
monitoring
Adequate protection
for any international
transfer of employee
data
117. z
Common Practices that May Be
Restricted Under the GDPR
Use of information on social media profiles for recruitment purposes
Storing HR and other employee data in the cloud
Wishing employees happy birthday on an intranet
Monitoring electronic communications in the workplace
Monitoring remote working
Scanning private devices as part of a BYOD policy
Monitoring company vehicles
118. z
#5
GDPR for Employers
Companies may be fined up to €20
million or 4% of global turnover
(whichever is greater) for non-
compliance with GDPR
KEY RISK
124. z
UNLESS
an employer demonstrates that he is
unable to reasonably accommodate to
an employee’s or prospective employee’s
religious observance or practice without
undue hardship on the conduct of the
employer’s business
134. z
After work, employees rub olive oil near entry
way of absent co-workers cubicle to rid the
absent co-worker of her demons?
135. z
Employee says part of their religion is to try
and convert others which includes constantly
discussing their beliefs with other employees
and denouncing other faiths?
139. z
RELIGION CAN BE
Beliefs that are not part of a
formal church or sect
Beliefs that are only subscribed
to by a small number of people
Beliefs that seem illogical or
unreasonable to others
140. z
Is this a religion?
Believe in a deity called the Flying
Spaghetti Monster (FSM)
Does not require literal belief in order
to provide spiritual enlightenment
Believe FSM Heaven has a beer
volcano and a stripper factory
Wear a pasta strainer on their head
for religious photos
141. z
Is this a religion?
Religion founded in 1988 – the
founder is religion’s current Pharaoh
Basis in Egyptian religion but founded
in Joliet IIIinois
Has a goddess who is a force that
keeps world balanced
Followers keep personal religious
shrine in their home
144. z
Is it more than a
minimal burden
on the operation
of business?
145. z
Violating a seniority system
Causing a lack of necessary staffing
Jeopardizing security or health
Costing employer more than a
minimal amount
Infrequent payment of overtime to
employees who substitute shifts
Customer preference or co-worker
disgruntlement
147. z
Scheduling ISSUES
Scheduling modifications are usually
a reasonable accommodation
Important to understand specifics of
employee’s religious obligations
Is voluntary shift trading enough?
148. z
Dress Code + Grooming
ISSUES
Hotel says employee has to cut his
dreadlocks to comply with dress code
Employee says dress dreadlocks are
required by Rastafarian religion
Can employer refuse to accommodate?
149. z
Prayer During Work ISSUES
Many cases involve Muslim requests
to pray during the work day
EEOC almost always says a break is a
reasonable accommodation
If you’re going to refuse, you need
solid data on either production or
safety concern
151. z
Hand Scanner ISSUES
Scans right hand
Great tool for monitoring attendance
and keeping track of time, right?
What if employee says scanning right
hand violates his religious beliefs?
153. z
Flu Shot ISSUES
Hospital requires all employees to
get flu shot
Says safety precaution justifies
requirement
Employee says ingesting foreign
medicine in her body violates
religious beliefs
154. z
Flu Shot ISSUES
Employee says will wear a mask
while working
Employer offers nasal spray
Employee says that won’t work
155. z
Customer Complaint ISSUES
Receptionist has a religious sign he
displays directly over his left shoulder
Can company terminate him if he
doesn’t take it down? What about a
cubicle instead of the lobby?
He is in the lobby, so when customers
enter, they see it
Company asks him to remove it, he
says it is required by his religion
156. z
Religious Objection ISSUES
You own a small bakery – employee
says she recently found religion and
believes gay marriage is a sin
She says she will refuse any gay
customers who request wedding cakes
What do you do?
157. z
Religious Objection ISSUES
Now employee says she has no
problem selling pre-made products
but she won’t bake a cake herself
that she knows is a wedding cake for
a gay wedding
Same result?
158. z
the TAKEAWAY
Don’t fight over whether it’s a religion or not
Avoid fighting over sincerity of belief
Don’t modify rules for someone
else for a different reason
Undue hardship is case by case analysis
159. z
Look at whether granting
accommodation would
result in denial of product or
service, or delay