Health care providers continue to experience significant levels of scrutiny from CMS, OIG, audit and recovery contractors, as well as state and federal law enforcement agencies. As a result of heightened enforcement activity, health care providers may be at risk. This presentation will update you on the current regulatory and enforcement environment.
1. Fraud and Abuse:
2016 Year In Review
February 14, 2017
Jeffrey Fitzgerald, Esq.
jfitzgerald@polsinelli.com
Asher Funk, Esq.
afunk@polsinelli.com
2. Settlement Trends
Pharma cases still here but dwindling
– Pfizer ($785M - alleged drug pricing)
– Genentech ($67M – effectiveness
misrepresentations)
– Valeant ($54 - kickback allegations including free
dinners and sham speaker payments)
– Biocomparables ($36M – off-label marketing)
– Forest Laboratories ($38M – off-label marketing)
– Cardinal Health ($44M - failure to report suspicious
opioid orders)
2
3. Settlement Trends
Increase in long term care
– Kindred ($125M – unnecessary therapy)
– Life Care Centers ($145M – unnecessary therapy)
– Medford Center for Living ($28M – quality)
– No. American Health ($28.5 - medical necessity)
– Westlake Convalescent ($3.5M – medical necessity)
– Daybreak Partners ($5.3M – worthless services)
3
4. Settlement Trends
Anti-Kickback Statute allegations continue
– Olympus ($646M – marketing & other inducements)
– Respironics ($35M – free call center support, but only
for purchasers)
– Tenet Health ($513M – payments to pre-natal clinics)
– Lexington Medical Center ($17M – employed MD
comp above FMV for 28 MDs)
– Memorial University ($10M – employed MD comp
over FMV and losses on medical practices)
4
5. Noteworthy Settlements
FDNY paid $4.3 for ambulance transports that
lacked medical necessity documentation
Continuum Health Partners paid $2.95M to
resolve litigation over $800K in late refunded
overpayments
CVS paid $3.5M for filling 500 forged opioid
prescriptions
3 separate ortho clinics collectively paid $2.4M
for using re-imported drugs
5
6. Enforcement Trends
Focus on individual is increasing
– Fall 2015: DOJ issues the Yates Memo
– Bostwick Lab owner pays $3.75M to settle FCA
suit (company paid $6.5M in 2015)
– No. American Health (required board chair to pay
$1M of total $28.5M settlement)
– Former CEO of Tuomey excluded and fined $1M
– Theranos CEO banned from owning a lab under
CLIA
6
7. Enforcement Trends
Focus on individual is increasing
– But, Warner Chilcott CEO acquitted
– Bohner v. Burwell, court upheld the four-year
exclusion of a pharma executive who pled guilty to
an FDA misdemeanor count
– Dec. 2016: Forest Park Hosp. - 21 people indicted
related to payments from private pay hospital
7
8. Court Decision Trends
General increase in Court of Appeals decisions
– 63 appellate decisions during the last year
– May reflect relator’s investment in cases and ease
of filing an appeal
– Hard to see a trend in appellate rulings
– Pleading standards and application of Rule 9(b)
loomed large
8
9. Court Decision Trends
Courts confirm the ambiguity cannot be basis for
FCA liability
– U.S. ex rel. Olson v. Fairview Health Servs. of Minn, 8th
Cir., (definition of “children’s hospital” was ambiguous
and hospital’s interpretation was not unreasonable)
– U.S. ex rel Donegan v. Anesthesia Assocs. of Kan. City,
8th Cir., (definition of “emergence” from anesthesia
was ambiguous and group’s interpretation was not
unreasonable)
– U.S. ex rel. Wall v. Vista Hospice Care and U.S. ex rel. et
al, v. Aseracare Inc. (differing opinion on hospice
eligibility insufficient)
9
10. Court Decision Trends
Limits of False Claims Act liability to be tested
– U.S. ex rel. D’Agostino v. EV3, Inc., 1st Cir., upheld
dismissal and ruled that alleged false statements to
FDA were not material to CMS for payment
– U.S. ex rel. Greenfield v. Medco Health Sys., dismissed
claims that drug companies donations to a hemophilia
charity were kickbacks
– U.S. ex rel. Bingham v. HCA, dismissed claim that “free
parking” to physicians violated AKS and Stark Law
– U.S. ex rel. Swoben v. United Healthcare Ins. Co., 9th
Cir., reversed dismissal of action alleging Medicare
Advantage Organizations inflated risk adjustment
scores in violation of the FCA
10
11. Court Decision Trends
Rule 9(b) continues to be effective for defendants…
– U.S. ex rel. Eberhard v. Physicians Choice Lab. Servs., LLC,
6th Cir., dismissed claims where relator failed to include
“representative examples” or plead the submission of
false claims
– U.S. ex rel. Kelly v. Novartis Pharm. Corp., 1st Cir.,
affirmed dismissal because relators did not plead
particular allegations about specific fraudulent claims for
payment
– U.S. ex rel. Chase v. LifePath Hospice, Inc., dismissed
claims against Hospice provider where relator failed to
allege facts about which Medicare claims were fraudulent
11
12. Noteworthy Court Decisions
U.S. ex rel. Ecobar v. Universal Health Svcs. (USSC)
(6/16/2016)
– Court held that claims to the government implicitly
represent compliance with regulations
– FCA liability turns on whether compliance with a
regulation is material to government’s decision to pay
the claim
– Little guidance as to what material means
• Rejected DOJ argument that a legal right to deny
payment for noncompliance constitutes material
• Condition of payment v. condition of participation
distinction continues to have meaning
– Evidence of materiality must be pled with particularity
12
13. Noteworthy Court Decisions
State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. v. U.S ex rel. Rigsby, Supreme
Court ruled that violations of the FCA seal requirement
do not result in automatic dismissal
U.S., ex rel. Johnson v. Kaner Med. Grp., P.A., 5th Cir.,
upheld dismissal of claims involving incorrectly
completed reimbursement forms based on mere
negligence
U.S. ex rel. Sheldon v. Kettering Health Network,
individual data breaches not sufficient to establish a
violation of the HITECH Act and the FCA
13
14. HIPAA Privacy & Security
OCR guidance on patient right to access
records under Privacy Rule (Jan. 2016)
Cybersecurity attacks continue
– Banner Health notifying 3.7M of cyber-attack
– Newkirk Products (issues health plan ID cards)
cyber-attack potentially affects 3.4M
14
15. HIPAA Privacy & Security
OCR publishing enforcement actions
– 13 resolutions in 2016 (up from 6 in 2015)
– Largest to date: Advocate Health ($5.5M for issues
affecting ~4M)
– First enforcement against Business Associate:
Catholic Health Care Services of the Archdiocese
of Philadelphia—theft of mobile device
15
16. Other Enforcement Developments
OIG issued 13 advisory opinions, but terminated
or modified 6 prior opinions
OIG and DOJ increased penalties
OIG issued new safe harbors for co-pay
reductions, retailer coupons and access to care
OIG touting data analytics looking at aggregate
Medicare payment data by geographic area
16
20. The DOJ’s “Year in Review”
Notable shift in percentage of settlement dollars from cases initiated by DOJ
Qui tam actions are 83% of new matters, but only 61% of dollars recovered
Recoveries from non-intervened cases returned to traditional levels
20
21. Predictions for 2016 –
How Did We Score?
Supreme Court limits the use of “implied certification” in FCA
cases to express “conditions of payment”
Yates Memo does not create a substantial difference in
resolution of FCA cases by providers
But increased enforcement and rhetoric of DOJ or OIG
pursuing individuals criminally, under FCA or with exclusion
(including some “exemplar” cases)
FCA enforcement continues to be dominated by
whistleblower cases with little or no clear DOJ priority agenda
Increase in FCA cases based on physician compensation
Increased state level enforcement (MFCU and Attorney
General) and growing volume of FCA cases based on Medicaid
21
Grade
22. Predictions for 2017
22
Appellate courts weigh in on the FCA’s materiality standard,
but no consistency or clarity
Enforcement focused on AKS and financial relationships
continues to be at high levels
No decrease in focus on long term care, hospice and home
health
Government commences / continues dragnet targeting
opioid and controlled substances prescriptions in a wide
variety of settings
Enforcement and rhetoric by DOJ and OIG about pursuing
individuals (more “exemplar” cases involving exclusion)
23. Jeffrey Fitzgerald
Shareholder | Polsinelli PC
Denver, CO
303.583.8205
jfitzgerald@polsinelli.com
Asher Funk
Shareholder | Polsinelli PC
Chicago, IL
312.873.3635
afunk@polsinelli.com
24. Fraud and Abuse:
2016 Year In Review
February 14, 2017
Jeffrey Fitzgerald, Esq.
jfitzgerald@polsinelli.com
Asher Funk, Esq.
afunk@polsinelli.com