Presentation of slides describing the methodology and results of 'Creativity: London's Core Business' (GLA 2002).
The presentation was given to the London School of Economics on the 15th of December 2002.
Please see the second slide for further bibliographical information
Incoming and Outgoing Shipments in 1 STEP Using Odoo 17
2002i core business supplementary slides for lse 15 12-2003
1. Is Creativity an Industry?
Alan Freeman
GLA Economics
LSE 15 December 2003
2. These slides present the findings and methodology of Creativity:
London’s Core Business, the first Greater London Authority report
on London’s Creative Industries, which can be found at
http://www.london.gov.uk/mayor/economic_unit/docs/create_inds_re
p02.pdf.
They supplement a second presentation, also on Slideshare, which
contains all the colour graphics from the report.
The information in this presentation is mainly for historical interest.
There have been four subsequent updates on London’s creative
industries, which supersede the data presented here. They will in due
course be posted at the author’s open access repository page on
http://ideas.repec.org/e/pfr102.html
3. Why it matters
Culture, creation and intervention
Commodification has redefined ‘culture’
Creative Industry: ‘Culture that makes Money’
Search for an evidence base
–
Uses two ‘standard’ economic classification systems
Standard Occupational Classification: what the workers do
Standard Industrial Classification: where they do it
But what does ‘Industry’ mean?
5. Where we are at
•Industrial Classification (SIC)
•Occupational Classification (SOC)
•An ‘initial hypothesis’
•A new phase of cultural commodification
•(A) new branch(es) of the division of labour
•Something in common – but what?
15. A brief conceptual geology
‘Data’ is not neutral
Taxonomy accumulated over time
–
–
–
Agriculture - Physiocrats
Manufacturing – Industrial Economists
Services - Financial Economists
16. Principles used in constructing NACE and followed
in SIC (2003)
1. The main criteria employed in delineating divisions and groups
(the two and three digit categories, respectively) of NACE
concern the characteristics of the activities of the producing units.
The major aspects of the activities are:
(i) the character of the goods and services produced,
(ii) the uses to which the goods and services are put, and
(iii) the inputs, the process, and the technology of production.
11. An activity is said to take place when resources such as
equipment, labour, manufacturing techniques, information
networks or products are combined, leading to the creation of
specific goods or services. An activity is characterised by an
input of products (goods or services), a production process
and an output of products.
17. A Health warning about
Hierarchical Classification
Tractors or food?
18. Leontieff on industry
'any national economy can be described as a system of mutually
interrelated industries or - if one prefers a more abstract term interdependent economic activities
...the whole system has been subdivided into 50 sectors
comprising
–
–
–
–
–
–
agriculture,
various extractive and manufacturing industries,
electric public utilities,
three kinds of transportation,
trade
and other types of service industries.
19. Some problems
Why?
–
–
–
–
are ‘Electric’ utilities different from any other?
is agriculture as a whole considered to be an industry?
Is manufacturing treated as a set of distinct industries?
are there three kinds of transportation and not two, or four?
Some problematic illustrations
–
–
–
–
–
Wood (construction, materials, or agriculture?)
Ships (coracles to supertankers)
‘Oil’ - one product?
Chemicals process
Moonboots and slippers
21. Pavitt and innovation
Rejection of ‘industry-based’ classification
Subject is ‘innovative behaviour’
Everywhere innovates
–
–
–
GM
Flower-selling and tropical fish
Car industry
Industrial taxonomy is inadequate
Need ‘cross-cutting’ taxonomy
22. Typical industrial sectors of
Pavitt’s Categories
Category
Traditional
Emerging
Supplier Dominated Textiles, Foot-wear
Tourism
Specialized
Suppliers
Machinery and
instruments
Software
Science-Based
Chemicals, Electrical Bio-engineering, Space
Scale Intensive
Automobiles
Software, Hotels
Food-chains
Information
Intensive
Banking
Retailing, Insurance
23. Where did industrial classification
come from?
Marx – social reproduction
Marshall – origin of products
Leontieff – interrelations of purchase and sale
24. Kondratieffs and paradigms
Industries present themselves
Specialisation is a driving force
K-waves throw up new forms of organisation
–
–
–
–
–
Manufacturing = ‘the factory’
The Age of Steam ‘technology’
The Age of Steel and Electricity ‘power’
The Age of Oil and Air ‘transport and communication’
The Information Age - ?
25. Period
Successive Techno- Industrial
Economic
organisation
Paradigms
Typical industries
Pavitt's
category of
firms
1770-1830
Early Mechanisation
Growing importance
of small
manufacturing firms
Textiles, Potteries,
Machinery
Supplier
dominated
1840-1880
Steam power and
railway
Separation been
producers of capital
and consumption
goods
Mechanical
engineering, Steel
and Coal
Specialized
suppliers
1890-1930
Opportunities
associated to
scientific discoveries
Emergence of large
firms
Chemicals,
Science based
Electrical machinery,
Engineering
1940-1980
Fordist and Taylorist
revolutions
Oligopolistic
Automobiles,
competition for mass Synthetic products,
consumption
Consumer durables
Scale intensive
1990-
Information and
communication
Networks of firms,
strong user-produces
Information
intensive
Microelectronics,
Telecoms, Software
26. Why isn’t there a science industry?
Science is a component of everything
–
–
–
Science not commercialised as a product
–
–
–
But so is land
And so are buildings (factories or offices)
So is power
‘Tacit’ knowledge
Public goods
Not abstractly transferrable
There are few if any ‘science factories’
–
Research lab is typically either public or subsidiary
27. Can there be a Creation Industry?
Product differentiation is all
Tailored to exact specifications
‘One-off’ or short run
Timing of the essence
Planning newness
Supply-dominated
Human ‘capital’ as a universal resource
28.
29. A technological reversal
Innovations are in short run production
•High tech, High complexity, Growing formalism
The New Economy of Agglomeration
•Principal investment = human capital
•Stone farming
Success is a product of failure
•Risk-pooling