The document summarizes the results of several statistical analyses conducted on survey data collected from 40 female respondents. It finds: 1) There was no significant difference in assessment attitudes based on age, educational attainment, or length of service. However, there was a near-significant difference based on trainings attended. 2) Assessment attitudes were significantly different based on age group, with older respondents having less positive attitudes. 3) Perceptions of accommodation practices were significantly different based on age, educational attainment, and length of service, but not based on trainings attended.

1. 1.2. Respondents’ Gender
The table below presents the distribution of the respondents according to gender.
Table 1
Respondents’ Gender
Gender Frequency Percentage
Male 0 0.00
Female 40 100.00
Total 40 100.00
It can be seen in the table that all the respondents were female.
4.1. Significant Difference in the Assessment in the Attitude of the Respondents
When Group According to Age
The table below presents the result of the test of difference between Assessment
in the Attitude of the Respondents and its age group.
Table 1
Significant Difference Between Assessment in Attitude
and Respondents Age Group
Age
Group
Mean SD
Source SS df MS
F-
value
p-
value
Interpretatio
n
Decision
25-30 3.94 0.41 Between-
Treatments
0.15 3 0.05
0.21 .214
Not
Significant
Accept Ho
31-35 3.91 0.42
36-40 3.80 0.53
Within-
Treatments 33.09 144 0.23
Above 40 3.44 0.40 Total 33.24 147
*p-value < .05 is significant

2. 4.2. Significant Difference in the Assessment in the Attitude of the
Respondents When Group According to Educational Attainment
Table 1
Significant Difference Between Assessment in Attitude
and Respondents Educational Attainment
Educational
Attainment
Mean SD
Source SS df MS
F-
value
p-
value
Interpretation Decision
Master’s
Degree
3.96 0.44 Between-
Treatments
0.37 2 0.19
0.94 .394
Not
Significant
Accept
Ho
Bachelor’s
Degree
3.74 0.45 Within-
Treatments
21.30 108 0.20
Master’s Unit 3.63 0.40 Total 21.67 110
*p-value < .05 is significant
Table 1
Significant Difference Between Assessment in Attitude
and the Length of Service in Public School
Test
Variables
Mean
Standard
Deviation
t-value
p-
value
Interpretation Decision
Assessment in
Attitude
4.24 0.54
1.35 .182
Not
Significant
Accept Ho
Length of
Service in
Public School
4.09 0.37
*p-value < .05 is significant
Table 1
Significant Difference Between Assessment in Attitude
and the Trainings Attended About Inclusive Education
Test
Variables
Mean
Standard
Deviation
t-value
p-
value
Interpretation Decision
Assessment in
Attitude
4.20 0.36 1.85 .069 Not Accept Ho

3. Trainings
Attended 4.01 0.55 Significant
*p-value < .05 is significant
Table 1
Significant Difference Between Perception of Accommodation
Practices and Respondents Age Group
Age
Group
Mean SD
Source SS df MS
F-
value
p-
value
Interpretation Decision
25-30 3.94 0.41
Between-
Treatments
6.45 3 2.15
10.98 .000 Significant
Reject
Ho
31-35 3.91 0.42
Within-
Treatments
31.36 160 0.20
36-40 3.80 0.53
Total 37.81 163
Above
40
3.44 0.40
*p-value < .05 is significant
5.2. Significant Difference in the Perception of Accommodation Practices of
the Respondents in Terms of Educational Attainment
The table below presents the result of the test of difference between perception
of accommodation practices of the respondents and its educational attainment.
Table 1
Significant Difference Between Perception of Accommodation
Practices and Respondents Educational Attainment
Educational
Attainment
Mean SD
Source SS df MS
F-
value
p-
value
Interpretation Decision
Master’s
Degree
3.96 0.44
Between-
Treatments
2.33 2 1.17
6.31 .002 Significant
Reject
Ho
Bachelor’s
Degree
3.74 0.45
Within-
Treatments
22.17 120 0.18
Master’s
Unit
3.63 0.40 Total 24.50 122
*p-value < .05 is significant

4. 5.3. Significant Difference in the Perception of Accommodation Practices of
the Respondents in Terms of the Length of Service in Public School
The table below presents the result of the test of difference between perception
of accommodation practices of the respondents and the length of service in public
school.
Table 1
Significant Difference Between Perception of Accommodation Practices
and the Length of Service in Public School
Test
Variables
Mean
Standard
Deviation
t-
value
p-
value
Interpretation Decision
Perception of
accommodation
practices
3.97 0.43
3.65 .000 Significant Reject Ho
Length of
Service in
Public School
3.63 0.41
*p-value < .05 is significant
5.4. Significant Difference in the Perception of Accommodation Practices of
the Respondents in Terms of Trainings attended About Inclusive Education
The table below presents the result of the test of difference between perception
of accommodation practices of the respondents in terms of trainings attended about
inclusive education.
Table 1
Significant Difference Between Perception of Accommodation Practices
and the Trainings Attended About Inclusive Education
Test
Variables
Mean
Standard
Deviation
t-
value
p-
value
Interpretation Decision
Perception of 3.75 0.41 0.48 .633 Not Accept Ho

5. accommodation
practices
Significant
Trainings about
inclusive
education
3.71 0.40
*p-value < .05 is significant