The document discusses the personal problems faced by industrial engineering students, including financial, relationship, and academic stressors. It highlights the impact of these issues on mental health, revealing that many students experience varying levels of depression and employ different coping strategies. Recommendations for improving student well-being include promoting mental healthcare, organizing stress management seminars, and offering scholarships and part-time job opportunities.

1. Personal Problems
of
Industrial Engineering
Students

2. Statement of the
Problem

3. “Identification of personal problems of Industrial Engineering students that
occur most, how it affect them, and how they cope with those problems.”

4. Introduction

5. Industrial Engineering Students
They are the sample group that usually experience stressors since
they are mostly under pressure.
Some stressors of Industrial Engineering Students:
 Financial concerns
 Relationship issues
 Family pressures
 Stressful academic and classroom pressures

6. Examples of Personal Problem of Students
Family Dynamics
This cause significant stress to student due to unparalleled changes
to family structures.
Causes of family problems:
• Separation
• Divorce
• Death
• Abandonment
• Lack of attention

7. Depression
This problem manifest in varrying degree from symptomology to clinical.
This usually associated with mood disturbances in physical, emotional,
behavioral, and cognitive.
Eating Disorders
This is a disorder where a person fail to meet the clinical criteria for a label of
disorder. These behavior may be due to compulsive eating or overeating.

8. Substance Abuse
This is usually due to psychological and socio-cultural influences.
Some forms of addiction is caused by alcohol, drugs and smoking.
Campus/School Services
Poor security, service and guidance from schools and campuses cause
students to encounter stress. Lacking of attention from the institutions
affect the behavior of students inside the premises.

9. Background of the Study

10. Personal problems are common in a college
student’s daily life in a university.
Students are accumulating mental health
problems. These cases leads to suicide, which is
one of the leading cause of death for college
students

11. Stress

12. Coping
is expending conscious effort to solve personal and interpersonal
problems, and seeking to master, minimize or tolerate stress or conflict.
Adaptive Maladaptive

13. Coping Strategies
Task-oriented
Emotional-oriented
Avoidance-oriented

14. CISS
The CISS is a self-report measure designed to assess coping styles.
Zung Self-Rating Depression Scale
It assesses the level of depression for patients diagnosed with depressive
disorder.
The scores range from 25-100:
25-49 Normal Range
50-59 Mildly Depressed
60-69 Moderately Depressed
70 and above Severely Depressed

15. Discussion

16. Broken Hearted
unemployed parents
Self supporting
Recurrent insults and teases
Severed ties with friends
Rejected by loved ones
Noisy Neighborhood
Terror Professor
“Friend-zoned”
Long-Distance Relationship
Addiction to Drugs/Alchohol
Pressure of being the breadwinner
Broken Family
Envy to siblings
Classmate Bullying
Seeking attention to parents
Misunderstandings with a staff/professor
Practical Jokes victim
Depressed/Stressed
Absenteeism of Professor
Plastic Friends/pretend friends
Third-party love life
Poor time management
Tuition fee expense
Bad influence friends
Humiliation in front of class
Bad vibes with the professor
Dirty environment
High temperature on rooms
Illegitimate child
Sophisticated Lovelife
Social climber
Shunned by family
Gold digger girlfriend/boyfriend
Daily expense
Harassment of a Professor
Cyber Bullying
Peer Pressure
Possible Problems encountered of a college student

17. Lovelife Financial Family Friends
Rejected by loved ones
Broken Hearted
Third-party love life
Long-Distance Relationship
“Friend-zoned”
Gold digger BF/GF
Sophisticated Love life
Unemployed parents
Self supporting
Breadwinner
Social climber
Tuition fee expense
Daily expense
Graveyard shift
Broken Family
Seeking attention to
parents
Illegitimate child
Envy to siblings
Shunned by family
Severed ties with a friend
Addiction to Drugs/Alchohol
Plastic Friends/pretend
friends
Bad influence friends
Peer pressure
Faculty Bullying Others
Terror Professor
Absenteeism of Professor
Bad vibes with the Profess
Harassment of Professor
Student-Professor Relationship
Misunderstandings with a
staff/professor
Humiliation in front of class
Cyber bullying
Classmate Bullying
Recurrent insults and
teases
Practical jokes victim
Noisy neighbourhood
/campus
High Temperature
Dirty Environment
Depressed/Stressed
Affinity Diagram

18. 𝑛 =
𝑁
1 + (𝑁 𝑥 𝑒2)
Where: n is the sample size
N is the population size
E is the margin of error
𝑛 =
784
1 + (784 𝑥 0.052)
𝑛 =
784
1 + 1.96
𝑛 =
784
2.96
𝑛 = 264.8649 𝑜𝑟 𝟐𝟔𝟓
Slovin’s Formula

19. Analysis
After tallying the survey, it is expected to acquire the
number of problems encountered by students, the impact and
frequency of each problems, the coping strategies of the
students and the result of self-assessing of depression. The
proponents used quality control tools to provide more vibrant
presentation and to arrange the data with noticeable display

20. Table 3: Pareto Chart of Encountered Personal Problems
155
123
57 51 50
24
33.70
60.43
72.83
83.91
94.78
100
0.00
10.00
20.00
30.00
40.00
50.00
60.00
70.00
80.00
90.00
100.00
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
Financial Faculty Family Friends Lovelife Bullying
Encountered Personal Problems
A. Encountered Personal Problems

21. Table 4: Check sheet of People who have encountered financial
problem
Age Range Yes No Total Percentage
17 and below 23 13 36 63.89
18 years old 20 21 41 48.78
19 years old 27 25 52 51.92
20 years old 42 34 76 55.26
21 and above 43 17 60 71.67

22. Table 5: Check sheet of People who have encountered faculty/staff problem
Age Range Yes No Total Percentage
17 and below 4 32 36 11.11
18 years old 25 16 41 60.98
19 years old 28 24 52 53.85
20 years old 35 41 76 46.05
21 and above 31 29 60 51.67

23. B. Impact of the Problem
Category
Affirmed
Respondents
Total
Respondents
Percentage
Financial 35 265 13.21
Family 31 265 11.70
Faculty 28 265 10.57
Bullying 9 265 3.40
Friends 9 265 3.40
Lovelife 8 265 3.02
Table 6.1: Check Sheet of Extreme Impact

24. Table 6.2: Bar Graph of Extreme Impact
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
Financial Family Faculty Bullying Friends Lovelife
Extreme Impact

25. Table 7.1: Check Sheet of High Impact
Category
Affirmed
Respondents
Total
Respondents
Percentage
Financial 60 265 22.64
Faculty 45 265 16.98
Family 29 265 10.94
Friends 27 265 10.19
Bullying 14 265 5.28
Lovelife 9 265 3.40

26. Table 7.2: Bar Graph of High Impact
High Impact
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Financial Faculty Family Friends Bullying Lovelife

27. Table 8.1: Check Sheet of Moderate Impact
Category
Affirmed
Respondents
Total
Respondents
Percentage
Bullying 79 265 29.81
Financial 73 265 27.55
Faculty 49 265 18.49
Family 46 265 17.36
Friends 44 265 16.60
Lovelife 35 265 13.21

28. Table 8.2: Bar Graph of Moderate Impact
Moderate Impact
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
Faculty Lovelife Bullying Financial Friends Family

29. Table 9.1: Check Sheet of Low Impact
Category
Affirmed
Respondents
Total
Respondents
Percentage
Bullying 3 265 29.81
Financial 73 265 27.55
Faculty 49 265 18.49
Family 46 265 17.36
Friends 44 265 16.60
Lovelife 35 265 13.21

30. Table 8.2: Bar Graph of Low Impact
Low Impact
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
Bullying Financial Faculty Family Friends Lovelife

31. Table 10.1: Check Sheet of No Impact
Category
Affirmed
Respondents
Total
Respondents
Percentage
Bullying 143 265 53.96
Financial 121 265 45.66
Faculty 102 265 38.49
Family 86 265 32.45
Friends 72 265 27.17
Lovelife 27 265 10.19

32. Table 8.2: Bar Graph of No Impact
No Impact
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
Bullying Financial Faculty Family Friends Lovelife

33. Table 11: Pareto Chart of Total Points of Problems Based on Impact
798
702
641
553
510
461
0.00
20.00
40.00
60.00
80.00
100.00
120.00
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900

34. B. Frequency of the Problem
Table 12: Check Sheet of Daily/Permanent Frequency of Problems
Problems Count
Financial 28
Faculty 14
Family 12
Friends 8
Lovelife 6
Bullying 2
0
5
10
15
20
25
30

35. Table 13: Check Sheet of Persistent/Recurrent Frequency of Problems
Problems Count
Financial 45
Faculty 38
Family 17
Friends 14
Lovelife 8
Bullying 5
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50

36. Table 14: Check Sheet of “Sometimes” Frequency of Problems
Problems Count
Financial 101
Faculty 73
Family 57
Friends 52
Lovelife 50
Bullying 37
0
20
40
60
80
100
120

37. Table 15: Check Sheet of “Rarely” Frequency of Problems
Problems Count
Financial 114
Faculty 84
Family 77
Friends 67
Lovelife 63
Bullying 62
0
20
40
60
80
100
120

38. Table 16: Check Sheet of No Frequency of Problems
Problems Count
Financial 147
Faculty 124
Family 106
Friends 73
Lovelife 71
Bullying 35
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160

39. Table 17: Pareto Chart of Total Points Based on Frequency
756
664
573
532
479 454
0.00
20.00
40.00
60.00
80.00
100.00
120.00
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800

40. D. Coping Mechanism
The table illustrates that the majority of IE Students are task-oriented when
dealing with stress or problems
3.33
3.18
3.12
3.02
2.97
0.00
20.00
40.00
60.00
80.00
100.00
120.00
2.70
2.80
2.90
3.00
3.10
3.20
3.30
3.40
Task
Oriented
Social
Distraction
Avoidance Distraction Emotional
Oriented
Table 18: Pareto Chart of Coping Mechanism (mean)

41. D. Coping Mechanism
The table shows that the most utilized coping mechanism is a task-oriented
coping, determining the priorities when faced on a problem which is
followed by using their time better.
Table 19: Check Sheet of Coping Mechanisms (top part)
Category No. Activity Total Mean SD
T 10 Determine priorities 1127 4.253 1.053
T 1 Use my time better 1068 4.030 0.880
SD 34 Talk to someone 1024 3.864 0.811
T 6 Take best course of action 993 3.747 0.827
E 32
Tell myself “it will never
happen again”
983 3.709 0.900

42. E. Depression Level
It shows that most of the IE students are in normal condition and just feel a
little depressed sometimes. The mean score is 43.02, which is normal but
nearly on “mildly depressed” degree (45-60).
Table 20: Check Sheet and Pie Chart of Depression Level
Degree Count
Normal 154
Mildy Depressed 111
Moderately Depressed 0
Severely Depressed 0
58%
42%
Normal Mildy Depressed
Moderately Depressed Severely Depressed

43. Conclusion

44. Conclusion:

45. Conclusion:
Task-oriented “Not depressed, just stressed”

46. Recommendation
• Promote Mental Healthcare
• Seminars about stress management and depression
• Scholarships
• Part-time Jobs
• Events for building relationship with staffs and students
• Coordination of student organizations & IE department

47. Thank you!